Hi guys!
Here is another video "Through The Years"
I used audio from Rock In Montreal and a lot of videos from concerts.
Here is the list:
Hammersmith 1975
Hyde Park 1976
Earl's Court 1977
Houston 1977
Munich 1979
Hammersmith 1979
St. Paul 1980
Sao Paulo 1981
Buenos Aires 1981
Caracas 1981
Montreal 1981
Milton 1982
Tokorozawa 1982
Rio 1985
Tokyo 1985
Live Aid Rehearsal 1985
Live Aid 1985
x2 Wembley 1986
Budapest 1986
Knebworth 1986
Yes, almost all stuff here was filmed in 4:3 (with exception of Montreal '81 and Budapest '86), so why do you cropped or squeeze them all to 16:9 ? It'll be much better to crop 16:9 stuff to 4:3. Otherwise very nice video!
But 4:3 looks ... bad.
Basically thanks alot for your opinions because this is very important for me to making better videos. This is not competition, this is tribute, this is for fun, but overall I want to make it in the best way as is possible to do.
Maybe someone of you have proposition to another video? To which song?
cmi wrote:
Yes, almost all stuff here was filmed in 4:3 (with exception of Montreal '81 and Budapest '86), so why do you cropped or squeeze them all to 16:9 ? It'll be much better to crop 16:9 stuff to 4:3. Otherwise very nice video!
I understand what you mean, but I also understand why Kacio made the video in 16:9. Personally I hate to watch 4:3 with stripes on the sides. Some of the image will of course get lost when you crop, but I can forgive this quite easily if the editing is done well.
Thanks a lot guys!
@Another Roger (re) - I've done video for The Hero (Special Version) with audio from Milton, but... hmmm, ok. I will try to do video to The Hero studio version ;)
I don't know when but for sure I will do this for you ;) link
Cheers!
Because the full screen looks better. Full screen is at 16: 9.
Unless we live in the twentieth century and we still have picture 4: 3 ?
So what if my screen is 21:9? Do I crop a 4:3 picture to that?
By cropping or stretching, you're essentially ruining the originally intended vision. Cutting out information (cropping), or blurring it (stretching).
Full picture > Full screen.
I think 4:3 can look very beautiful. Some of the best cinematography of all time was done in 4:3 (as was every film til the late 1940s).
I guess Kacio's point is that it looks bad interspersed with widescreen footage - I can see how that's a bit more down to preference, but I'd still err on the side of maintaining the full, undistorted image.