QueenZone discussion #1463392

The Real Wizard wrote: More tabloid bullshit. We can be almost completely certain that there is no footage of Freddie of any kind after May 1991. This morbid curiosity really needs to come to a grinding halt. He left us what he wanted us to see, end of.

andres_clip wrote: Brian in that interview in Days of our lives docu, when he say something about protecting Freddie and guess we lied just seems so fake.

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote: Brian in that interview in Days of our lives docu, when he say something about protecting Freddie and guess we lied just seems so fake.

Well, it isn't. Considering the stigma against gay people at the time, the media would've been 10x slimier than they were while just thinking he *might* have AIDS. So they had to keep it quiet. In fact, they could've lied forever, but Mercury decided to tell the truth the day before he died. That concert in 1992 was a huge deal in educating the public about AIDS and safe sex. What's your theory?

musicland munich wrote: Seriously...this thread brings me a fantastic idea I will work on in the near future. No, not too morbid - don't be afraid.. If it works out - Fine ! If not, it was worth a try :)

Fireplace wrote: Alright, no more food for this one.

Silversaw wrote: Knowing that Freddie was extremely against most interviews, do you really think he wanted to sit in front of a camera for anyone during his illness? I understand the morbid fascination behind seeing celebrities "out of their element", but what good is it going to do the Queen community to watch a man struggling to keep his shit together in the face of his own mortality?

The Real Wizard wrote:

Silversaw wrote: Knowing that Freddie was extremely against most interviews, do you really think he wanted to sit in front of a camera for anyone during his illness? I understand the morbid fascination behind seeing celebrities "out of their element", but what good is it going to do the Queen community to watch a man struggling to keep his shit together in the face of his own mortality?

^ bang on. In addition to that - if he told about five people until the day before his death, the DoRo guys certainly were not two of them.

Costa86 wrote: If we blocked everyone who didn't agree with us, we'd be Donald Trump. God forbid he ever becomes president of America. Oh, wait...

Kuijpy wrote: Can we block this fucker? He believes in his own theory that Freddie is filmed in November 1991 when he was dying...

Togg wrote: Freddie didn't even like talking about his music in interviews, do you seriously think he would have done an interview about AIDs, I just don't understand why anyone would think he would, read Pheobie's book, or read almost anything about him and you'll see he hated interviews and wasn't overly keen on being public about any aspect of his life, and certainly not AIDS. This is just Daily Mail style crap, it's utter rubbish, The band didnt even know until it was unavoidable, so he's not likely to go rush off and speak on camera

Vocal harmony wrote: ^^^^ this is true. How anyone can believe they are in a position to demand anything from an artist or their associates is laughable really. Queen Productions are not a governmental department miss using public funds. Also how can you demand to see something when you have no real proof of it's existence. I want Earls Court and Hammersmith 79 to be released. I think I shall write a strongly worded letter to Jim Beach demanding their release. . . . Well at least we know they're real and in the vaults ??

dysan wrote: How did you get coolest cat under your name? I want it!

andres_clip wrote: My God u must be right because everyone around him was blind. Starting to loose cred Oh wizard from?

mike hunt wrote: Another liberal crybaby! Are you one of those no job liberals who attack Cops and burn down cities in a so called protest? I'll tell you this, I was Independent until this election. Now I see democrats for what they truly are, crybabies and vicious animals. I see no trump supporters acting like animals. Attacking police and so on" but trump supporters are the racists? Lol

Holly2003 wrote: "secret Aids movies" sounds like your porn stash.

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Another liberal crybaby! Are you one of those no job liberals who attack Cops and burn down cities in a so called protest? I'll tell you this, I was Independent until this election. Now I see democrats for what they truly are, crybabies and vicious animals. I see no trump supporters acting like animals. Attacking police and so on" but trump supporters are the racists? Lol

Sure, but they're upset for legitimate reasons. Republicans are far worse for not being the least bit concerned about 20 million people losing their health care, climate change being erased from the white house website, and the reality of a narcissistic sociopath having the nuclear codes. And perhaps you missed the news about hate crimes on visible minorities by Trump supporters in the 24 hours after him being elected. Furthermore - how do you know the person you're responding to is a "liberal"? Is that your blanket term for everyone who doesn't support the Republican party? This guy is from Europe, where most countries have at least a dozen political parties, and therefore people aren't as easily classified in binary terms. But of course you knew that and considered that before posting, because American conservatives are the world standard for intellect and thoughtfulness in dialogue.

Oscar J wrote: Thank you for your relentless voice of sensibility, Wizard.

andres_clip wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Another liberal crybaby! Are you one of those no job liberals who attack Cops and burn down cities in a so called protest? I'll tell you this, I was Independent until this election. Now I see democrats for what they truly are, crybabies and vicious animals. I see no trump supporters acting like animals. Attacking police and so on" but trump supporters are the racists? Lol

Sure, but they're upset for legitimate reasons. Republicans are far worse for not being the least bit concerned about 20 million people losing their health care, climate change being erased from the white house website, and the reality of a narcissistic sociopath having the nuclear codes. And perhaps you missed the news about hate crimes on visible minorities by Trump supporters in the 24 hours after him being elected. Furthermore - how do you know the person you're responding to is a "liberal"? Is that your blanket term for everyone who doesn't support the Republican party? This guy is from Europe, where most countries have at least a dozen political parties, and therefore people aren't as easily classified in binary terms. But of course you knew that and considered that before posting, because American conservatives are the world standard for intellect and thoughtfulness in dialogue.

Oh Wizard stick to things you know like Queen for example...

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Another liberal crybaby! Are you one of those no job liberals who attack Cops and burn down cities in a so called protest? I'll tell you this, I was Independent until this election. Now I see democrats for what they truly are, crybabies and vicious animals. I see no trump supporters acting like animals. Attacking police and so on" but trump supporters are the racists? Lol

Sure, but they're upset for legitimate reasons. Republicans are far worse for not being the least bit concerned about 20 million people losing their health care, climate change being erased from the white house website, and the reality of a narcissistic sociopath having the nuclear codes. And perhaps you missed the news about hate crimes on visible minorities by Trump supporters in the 24 hours after him being elected. Furthermore - how do you know the person you're responding to is a "liberal"? Is that your blanket term for everyone who doesn't support the Republican party? This guy is from Europe, where most countries have at least a dozen political parties, and therefore people aren't as easily classified in binary terms. But of course you knew that and considered that before posting, because American conservatives are the world standard for intellect and thoughtfulness in dialogue.

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Another liberal crybaby! Are you one of those no job liberals who attack Cops and burn down cities in a so called protest? I'll tell you this, I was Independent until this election. Now I see democrats for what they truly are, crybabies and vicious animals. I see no trump supporters acting like animals. Attacking police and so on" but trump supporters are the racists? Lol

Sure, but they're upset for legitimate reasons. Republicans are far worse for not being the least bit concerned about 20 million people losing their health care, climate change being erased from the white house website, and the reality of a narcissistic sociopath having the nuclear codes. And perhaps you missed the news about hate crimes on visible minorities by Trump supporters in the 24 hours after him being elected. Furthermore - how do you know the person you're responding to is a "liberal"? Is that your blanket term for everyone who doesn't support the Republican party? This guy is from Europe, where most countries have at least a dozen political parties, and therefore people aren't as easily classified in binary terms. But of course you knew that and considered that before posting, because American conservatives are the world standard for intellect and thoughtfulness in dialogue.

Oh Wizard stick to things you know like Queen for example...

Is that your official rebuke - just attacking someone instead of providing a thoughtful counter-argument?

mike hunt wrote: Just pointing out the hypocrites marching and protesting against Trump, women that is, but they're ok with The Clintons. Does that even make sense?

AlbaNo1 wrote: What's the issue?

Oscar J wrote: "Good fucking Question!" The F bomb, good start. "My original complaint was stated by a liberal" You don't know he's a liberal, as previously stated. "crybaby" He has not come across as being a crybaby before. Maybe you're just attacking his person because he disagrees with you and you don't have any good counter arguments. "who has the nerve to put down our new president. He doesn't even live in America." Trump is a problem that concerns us all. The vast majority of people outside of America realise that he's a terrible and potentially very dangerous choice for president. And we're entitled to that opinion. "Obama was the worst" He certainly wasn't. Proof please. "Trump is already creating Jobs by the way. " Maybe he can create a few jobs, but at what cost? Employing a few thousand americans in a coal power plant spewing out as much CO2 as 10 million people. "Gave the military their biggest raise in ages." Great, just what the world needed. "He'll be great for the economy in my opinion. " That's not an argument, you don't have any proof for that. "And these liberal rioters might facing Jail time." And you certainly wouldn't mind. No wonder you support Trump. Narrow-mindedness and intolerance. "Obama would have applauded these losers." Straw man. "Wizard, it figures you would be down with these celebrities like Madonna, who say's shes 'gonna burn down the White House!" Straw man. "Even Brian May with his anti Trump rants, But Mr May didn't a have Problem with Clintion when he was screwing any girl with a pulse." Straw man. "I hate hypocrites!" You're just rambling now. But yes, hate is probably one of the big reasons for people voting for Trump. That usually ends well, history tells us. "Or being unfaithful to his wife May was, but has the nerve to say shit about Trump." He never groped random women, he didn't systematically insult them or belittle them. May is vastly more intelligent than Trump and like most clever people sees him for the person he is: a sexist, racist demagogue.

mike hunt wrote: Good fucking Question! My original complaint was stated by a liberal crybaby who has the nerve to put down our new president. He doesn't even live in America. Obama was the worst and Bush was horrible. Trump is already creating Jobs by the way. Gave the military their biggest raise in ages. He'll be great for the economy in my opinion. And these liberal rioters might facing Jail time. Obama would have applauded these losers. Wizard, it figures you would be down with these celebrities like Madonna, who say's shes 'gonna burn down the White House! Even Brian May with his anti Trump rants, But Mr May didn't a have Problem with Clintion when he was screwing any girl with a pulse. I hate hypocrites! Or being unfaithful to his wife May was, but has the nerve to say shit about Trump.

mike hunt wrote: Do you have proof Trump is a Racist?

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Do you have proof Trump is a Racist?

He was endorsed by KKK members, and he said nothing in response. The fact that he was elected president on these grounds alone is terrifying to anyone with an IQ over 85.

mike hunt wrote: Some of obamas failures include obama care

racked up more debt than the previous 43 presidents combined.

There was a sharp increase in shooting deaths of police officers in the last 2 years.

In a American poll 72 percent said that America was still in a recession

The economic growth has been the weakest of any post recession period since world war 11.

i'll write about some foreign policy failures like Bangazi soon, and weak boarder control.

mike hunt wrote: the rise of isis

Releasing terrorists

and his most recent disaster the pardoning of Chelsea Manning.

mike hunt wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Do you have proof Trump is a Racist?

He was endorsed by KKK members, and he said nothing in response. The fact that he was elected president on these grounds alone is terrifying to anyone with an IQ over 85.

He denied any involvement with the KKK, i remember him saying that was nonsense.

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Good fucking Question! My original complaint was stated by a liberal crybaby who has the nerve to put down our new president. He doesn't even live in America. Obama was the worst and Bush was horrible. Trump is already creating Jobs by the way. Gave the military their biggest raise in ages. He'll be great for the economy in my opinion. And these liberal rioters might facing Jail time. Obama would have applauded these losers. Wizard, it figures you would be down with these celebrities like Madonna, who say's shes 'gonna burn down the White House! Even Brian May with his anti Trump rants, But Mr May didn't a have Problem with Clintion when he was screwing any girl with a pulse. I hate hypocrites! Or being unfaithful to his wife May was, but has the nerve to say shit about Trump.

This post is one of the worst examples of gish gallup I've ever seen. There is just so much bullshit, opinions posed as fact, selective history, ad hominems, and straw man arguments to even begin to dissect it (thank goodness someone already did). You wouldn't even be able to compete on a high school debate team, never mind with adults. Sorry man. Maybe you're the one who should just stick to music.

mike hunt wrote: I just remembered the source of some my claims, the New York Post. I believe the article is called, time to face the facts Obama presidency was a failure. So Just type that in.

The Real Wizard wrote: Vox The Atlantic New York Times Washington Post The Guardian Slate NPR These are the most unbiased news sources I've found in the US. They are all examples of quality, thoughtful investigative journalism. Just about everything else is too polarized to either side. And as long as we trust fact checkers, they would almost certainly agree with me.

Haystacks Calhoun II wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote: Vox The Atlantic New York Times Washington Post The Guardian Slate NPR These are the most unbiased news sources I've found in the US. They are all examples of quality, thoughtful investigative journalism. Just about everything else is too polarized to either side. And as long as we trust fact checkers, they would almost certainly agree with me.

You just listed 7 of the most liberal leaning sources, if you can use the word sources, in the US. Nice try. We no longer have unbiased media, just organizations putting their spin on what is happening. Works for both sides.

Haystacks Calhoun II wrote: You just listed 7 of the most liberal leaning sources, if you can use the word sources, in the US.

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Another liberal crybaby! Are you one of those no job liberals who attack Cops and burn down cities in a so called protest? I'll tell you this, I was Independent until this election. Now I see democrats for what they truly are, crybabies and vicious animals. I see no trump supporters acting like animals. Attacking police and so on" but trump supporters are the racists? Lol

Sure, but they're upset for legitimate reasons. Republicans are far worse for not being the least bit concerned about 20 million people losing their health care, climate change being erased from the white house website, and the reality of a narcissistic sociopath having the nuclear codes. And perhaps you missed the news about hate crimes on visible minorities by Trump supporters in the 24 hours after him being elected. Furthermore - how do you know the person you're responding to is a "liberal"? Is that your blanket term for everyone who doesn't support the Republican party? This guy is from Europe, where most countries have at least a dozen political parties, and therefore people aren't as easily classified in binary terms. But of course you knew that and considered that before posting, because American conservatives are the world standard for intellect and thoughtfulness in dialogue.

Oh Wizard stick to things you know like Queen for example...

Is that your official rebuke - just attacking someone instead of providing a thoughtful counter-argument?

andres_clip wrote: But you clearly state that you don't know politics, claiming people who don't side with you have a lesser IQ cmon dude

Thistleboy1980 wrote: Andres, with all due respect, you said "We want to know now". Who's "we"? Are you speaking for us all? If so, you can't then complain when people tell you they don't want to see this stuff, should it exist (I doubt it does). That's the "we" talking back at you, giving their opinions. Calling them crybabies for having an opinion is absolutely senseless. For what it's worth, there will be a market for this (should the videos exist). But it's not for me. I'm content with what Freddie left us in terms of his music, with the final releases a valiant effort to give us one last thing. The messages, his feelings etc towards the end are there for us all to hear. The delicate, intimate thoughts and the way he dealt with mortality etc are all there, in the music - as, indeed, are his life stories in earlier music. Do we need to see him deteriorate? No. I doubt he made such videos, as he was a private person as we all know. If there ARE videos, it's for friends and family - not the morbidly curious.

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote: But you clearly state that you don't know politics, claiming people who don't side with you have a lesser IQ cmon dude

Pardon you - but you started this thread with a conspiracy theory, nor do you know how to construct a proper sentence. Leave politics to the adults, thanks.

andres_clip wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote: But you clearly state that you don't know politics, claiming people who don't side with you have a lesser IQ cmon dude

Pardon you - but you started this thread with a conspiracy theory, nor do you know how to construct a proper sentence. Leave politics to the adults, thanks.

I'm just writing so you'll understand.

mike hunt wrote: Get over yourself Wizard and Thomas! Not as smart as you claim too be. And pretty arrogant I must add. I gave sources from where political people disagree with you, the same as you giving me liberal sources. Everyone of these sources has an agenda. The Right and left, so we basically have too go by what we feel and go by the world we live in day by day. I live In New York, so I'm living it. Not Just Watching CNN From Canada Or The UK. I'm a working class guy who talks with my peers, most agree the liberals are out of control. They're acting like animals. Looking at them everyday has me leaning to the right. I relate more with them. Wizard always puting people down who don't agree with him. His IQ is so high be brags, lol.

The Real Wizard wrote:

Haystacks Calhoun II wrote: You just listed 7 of the most liberal leaning sources, if you can use the word sources, in the US.

According to the rest of the world, those sources are right down the centre. As Stephen Colbert once said - "facts have a well-known liberal bias." Also note that the rest of the world doesn't see politics in binary. The US may have two parties, but most other countries (especially in Europe) have more than that, or even dozens, often with more than one party ruling at a time (a coalition). The rest of the world doesn't interpret "not conservative" to automatically mean "liberal". It just means it's not conservative, as there are more than two ways to think. If anyone thinks Vox and The Atlantic are biased to the "left" in the same way that Fox and Breitbart are biased to the right, they are literally insane and unable of critical thought. Occupy Democrats - yes. But Vox, absolutely not.

Vocal harmony wrote: In politics (as with many things in life) there are two basic types of people. Those who talk only to the people who think like they do then blindly follow. And those who sit back look at the bigger picture and learn from it. Education is a provider of knowledge, but common sense and an ability to learn from more than one source will always further our understanding. Both Mr Quinn and Mr Wizard seem to have a much more open minded and educated view than some in this current thread

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

mike hunt wrote: Get over yourself Wizard and Thomas! Not as smart as you claim too be. And pretty arrogant I must add. I gave sources from where political people disagree with you, the same as you giving me liberal sources. Everyone of these sources has an agenda. The Right and left, so we basically have too go by what we feel and go by the world we live in day by day. I live In New York, so I'm living it. Not Just Watching CNN From Canada Or The UK. I'm a working class guy who talks with my peers, most agree the liberals are out of control. They're acting like animals. Looking at them everyday has me leaning to the right. I relate more with them. Wizard always puting people down who don't agree with him. His IQ is so high be brags, lol.

I see you're still too much of a coward to respond to my previous post, in which I put forward concrete arguments about the BS you are spewing regarding democrats/liberals as opposed to the Trump-regime.

The Real Wizard wrote: IQ is measurable. It's not a matter of opinion. When someone is drinking kool aid from biased news sources and resorting to logical fallacies during a debate, it means they're not very smart. They will not be able to pass a Mensa test if that's how poorly their brain functions.

mike hunt wrote: What about the Trump regime? They're In office for 4 days, how can we know if he's gonna do good! What we do know is Bush was the worst, Obama tried too clean his mess with mixed results at best. Obamacare is a mess as per Mr Clinton. I said it earlier, you want too talk about Trump and his sucess or failure, we could do that in a year. Now's not the time, 4 days he's in office!

AlbaNo1 wrote: The average voter has an average IQ.

mike hunt wrote: I gave sources from where political people disagree with you, the same as you giving me liberal sources. Everyone of these sources has an agenda. The Right and left, so we basically have too go by what we feel

I'm a working class guy who talks with my peers, most agree the liberals are out of control.

Haystacks Calhoun II wrote: The Atlantic, a 150 plus year old institution, is moderate at best. You lose all credibility in stating that Vox isn't a left leaning "publication". Then, you double down by saying if you disagree, you are insane. That exchange above pretty well calls you out, my friend.

Haystacks Calhoun II wrote: That said, those who behave online the way that they do is a large reason that Donald Trump is in office today. Had they went after Hillary Clinton, the single worst Presidential candidate to ever run for office, with one tenth of the vigor that they harbor for Trump supporters, we would have President Bernie Sanders.

mike hunt wrote: They're In office for 4 days, how can we know if he's gonna do good!

mike hunt wrote: But most of these stories are being told by the Democrats.

I havn't heard Trump being against Pro choice though.

mike hunt wrote: Always be worried when you have a new president, but in my opinion his healthcare will be better and more affordable than obamacare. Mark my words on that one.

Haystacks Calhoun II wrote: Hillary Clinton, the single worst Presidential candidate to ever run for office,

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote: But you clearly state that you don't know politics, claiming people who don't side with you have a lesser IQ cmon dude

Pardon you - but you started this thread with a conspiracy theory, nor do you know how to construct a proper sentence. Leave politics to the adults, thanks.

I'm just writing so you'll understand.

And I'm just writing to tell you that you're an idiot. If you are busy touting conspiracy theories as recently as your last post, then you are not qualified to lecture people on political philosophy. IQ is measurable. It's not a matter of opinion. When someone is drinking kool aid from biased news sources and resorting to logical fallacies during a debate, it means they're not very smart. They will not be able to pass a Mensa test if that's how poorly their brain functions. But you clearly do not understand either concept, so I really should stop wasting my time with you.

andres_clip wrote: A true scientists/professor speaking. I hold my breath for youre wise words.

mike hunt wrote: And people were tired of the Obama regime. Also Trump isn't a politician, he's a business man. People got tired of politicians. I was straight down the middle, trust me on that! But I disliked the way they handled their loss. Rioting, recounting the votes 3 times. Liberals on the college campus screaming at trump supporters. Yea, right now I dislike the left.

The Real Wizard wrote:

andres_clip wrote: A true scientists/professor speaking. I hold my breath for youre wise words.

It's "your", not "you're". And "youre" isn't even a word. Nor am I a "scientists". I am one person. "Scientist" should be singular, not plural. Learn how to write a proper sentence before you talk about politics. Geez.

AlexRocks wrote: Oh, my god The Real Wizard is a Real Loser! Lol.

The Real Wizard wrote:

 Vox - LEFT BIAS  

The Atlantic  - Left-Center Bias  New York Times - Left-Center Bias Washington Post  - Left-Center Bias  The Guardian  - Left-Center Bias  Slate - LEFT BIAS  NPR  - Left-Center Bias  These are the most unbiased news sources I've found in the US. They are all examples of quality, thoughtful investigative journalism. Just about everything else is too polarized to either side. And as long as we trust fact checkers, they would almost certainly agree with me.

Panchgani wrote: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/about/

The "Least Biased" sites I consider generally reasonable would include the Associated Press, Factcheck.org, Pew Research, Politifact, Reuters, and Snopes.

andres_clip wrote: . . . .Shame on you, I thought listening to Queen was about joy and no racism/bullying and all that merry go round but you as a true globalist show your face. Should start listening to some other group that suit your agenda better.

Oscar J wrote: For the first time in history, according to The Economist Intelligence unit's Democracy Index, USA is no longer a "full democracy", but rather a "flawed democracy". link

The Real Wizard wrote: We are witnessing the end of the American empire.

Costa86 wrote: I wouldn't include Malta in that comparison, simply because it's no surprise that Malta is a strong democracy. It's been an EU member state for 13 years, has a history of British-influenced political tradition, and has for most of its history been a country with a strong and liberal Western European culture.

RStanton wrote: This guy is spot on: link 22,570 thumbs up v 564 thumbs down.

RStanton wrote: Libtard baiting, it's a fun sport!!! "hate mongering old man" isn't that rather ageist? Maybe he has more life experience than you?

The Real Wizard wrote:

RStanton wrote: Libtard baiting, it's a fun sport!!! "hate mongering old man" isn't that rather ageist? Maybe he has more life experience than you?

Concerned about ageism but not racism? That's rich. Move along, son.

RStanton wrote: I was pointing out that Oscar J was concerned about racism but not about ageism.

Oscar J wrote: "Libtard". How does it feel to be so immensely stupid? Genuinely curious. I'm Swedish by the way. The liberal parties are to the right in our system, so your childish terms aren't really applicable. Regarding "ageism" - let's call him a grumpy and scared man full of despise, who just happens to be old.

RStanton wrote: Ah, if someone disagrees with you it's trolling...I see. At least you have removed your derogatory "son" comment in your latest post and Oscar J has rolled back on his "old man" hate speech - it's nice that I have been able to convert a couple of horrible ageists (and misogynist in your case), my work here is done!

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

RStanton wrote: Ah, if someone disagrees with you it's trolling...I see. At least you have removed your derogatory "son" comment in your latest post and Oscar J has rolled back on his "old man" hate speech - it's nice that I have been able to convert a couple of horrible ageists (and misogynist in your case), my work here is done!

Congratulations. You've just proven that you completely fail to understand the meaning of the word "misogynist".

RStanton wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

RStanton wrote: Ah, if someone disagrees with you it's trolling...I see. At least you have removed your derogatory "son" comment in your latest post and Oscar J has rolled back on his "old man" hate speech - it's nice that I have been able to convert a couple of horrible ageists (and misogynist in your case), my work here is done!

Congratulations. You've just proven that you completely fail to understand the meaning of the word "misogynist".

Congratulations. You've just proven that you completely fail to understand the meaning of the phrase "taking the piss". As I clearly stated previously "Libtard baiting, it's a fun sport!!!"

Oscar J wrote: "Speaking of Jewish people you do realize that Israelis are banned from many Muslim countries, of course the left never protest hysterically about that?" Two wrongs don't make a right.

Costa86 wrote: Ageism? How about sexism. Donald Trump is a misogynist. He is a married to a beautiful woman, 24 years his junior, who is actually a tart from a backwoods town in Slovenia, and who obviously only married him because he's Donald Trump and he was her meal ticket. That alone tells you a lot about Donald Trump.

RStanton wrote: thomasqinn, Speaking of Jewish people you do realize that Israelis are banned from many Muslim countries, of course the left never protest hysterically about that? Such hypocrisy. Anyway, in deference to our greatest ever sharer (The Real Wizard) I am going to take his advice and “move along”, but I’ll leave you with this. Do you remember our second greatest sharer (pittrek) he was subject to a foul mouthed tirade over in the Personal section for expressing very mild views. In fact, YourValentine had to step in and reprimand the abuser regarding his vile language. It may have been a coincidence but he didn’t share much after that. The abuser disappeared for quite some time, I assume in shame and embarrassment. I can't quite remember the name of the abuser of one of our most valued contributors but I do recall he was a member of the Queenzone thought police… do you remember his name thomasquinn? Ah yes, I remember now it was thomasquinn wasn't it, shutting down free speech by swearing at people.

mike hunt wrote:

Costa86 wrote: Ageism? How about sexism. Donald Trump is a misogynist. He is a married to a beautiful woman, 24 years his junior, who is actually a tart from a backwoods town in Slovenia, and who obviously only married him because he's Donald Trump and he was her meal ticket. That alone tells you a lot about Donald Trump.

And why are the clintons still together? True love?

Costa86 wrote: Ageism? How about sexism. Donald Trump is a misogynist. He is a married to a beautiful woman, 24 years his junior, who is actually a tart from a backwoods town in Slovenia, and who obviously only married him because he's Donald Trump and he was her meal ticket. That alone tells you a lot about Donald Trump.

AlbaNo1 wrote:

Costa86 wrote: Ageism? How about sexism. Donald Trump is a misogynist. He is a married to a beautiful woman, 24 years his junior, who is actually a tart from a backwoods town in Slovenia, and who obviously only married him because he's Donald Trump and he was her meal ticket. That alone tells you a lot about Donald Trump.

Any irony in calling Trump a sexist misogynist at the same time as calling his woman a" tart"? Just saying......

que.123 wrote: If Geert Wilders (the Dutch Donald Trump)

que.123 wrote: If Geert Wilders (the Dutch Donald Trump) wins the election in March I imagine Thomas Quinn will be in full melt down mode!!! (His profile says he is from The Netherlands). I believe Wilders is ahead in the polls at the moment.

RS_Protos wrote: "If you look deep enough into Le Pen's party, you'll find people who see Hitler as a hero. " I didn't know that, if that's true then I agree with you, that is pathetic!

The Real Wizard wrote: Thank goodness rationality prevailed, at least in your country. But methinks the right-leaning populism as a whole isn't going away any time soon.

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

RS_Protos wrote: "If you look deep enough into Le Pen's party, you'll find people who see Hitler as a hero. " I didn't know that, if that's true then I agree with you, that is pathetic!

IF that is true? Seriously, why are you giving your opinion if you don't know anything about the subject?

RS_Protos wrote: Oh boy, quotes-lecture time :), all good though. But yes, i'm little behind in the French politics, been a little busy in the US politics, :), will have to do some research.