greaserkat 08.07.2016 10:19 |
It is horrible to see violence, period. Police Officer involved killings have been very constant this year. I don't know if maybe this is the start of a big civil unrest in this country... link link link |
brENsKi 08.07.2016 16:03 |
both sides are as bad as each other it no longer matters what the origins or noble objectives of a cause now hijacked by anarchists and marxists. it's all fucked in the head now. link |
matt z 08.07.2016 17:37 |
^ I'm betting some of them did. But the regular majority wouldn't. Many people of all sexes, colors and creeds were crazy during that shooting. it hit the airwaves relatively fast. The media will undoubtedly celebrate the folks that DO enjoy it. food for thought. I regularly hear older white men at my local tavern virtually say thank God everytime some black "suspect" is shot in the news. THAT story doesn't get covered. it happens far too often. I can empathize with someone's frustration that objectives are ridiculed and so few are held accountable. the recent black man that was shot to death in his car in front of his girlfriend and child was enough to make people disgusted. its sad however that the Black Lives Matter movement (*an attempt to draw attention to the disparity in police shootings ; possibly achieving legislation) has attracted so many assholes as well sadly the ambush brings the significance of life to another group of people that don't seem to realize the very reason the Black Lives Matter thing came into being. The general white population doesn't give a crap WHICH black people die, even if under the operation of a civil service job. it's like very little has changed |
Oscar J 08.07.2016 18:11 |
brENsKi: the man behind that shady site is a well know conspiracy theorist: link But yeah, there are always some individuals, on both sides, taking things way too far. |
thomasquinn 32989 09.07.2016 07:16 |
"anarchists and marxists" As soon as you read that, you know you can stop reading. Extremism begets extremism, violence begets violence. The USA is still suffering from the same problems as in the '50s/'60s, and those were the same problems as under Reconstruction (1865-1877) - the Civil War is still not completely over, and I don't see it ending anytime soon. Despite the fact that equality under the law is mostly a legal fact now (there are still many loopholes that allow for discrimination), REAL equality is not. Racism is still a tool used by the powererful to get the support of poor whites against their own interests - the Donald Trump campaign is illustrating that, and it is not markedly different from the politics of the Redeemer Democrats, wealthy ex-confederates who represented the interests of the rich to the detriment of the poor (both black and white), during the late Reconstruction era. During the Obama-presidency, much racist sentiment that was hidden from view during most of the '80s, '90s and '00s resurfaced in full view - white supremacists have become more visible in politics once more, as they were until the late '60s and early '70s The Trump-campaign is overtly race-baiting, both anti-black, anti-Islamic and now even anti-semitic (and I'm not just referring to the star-of-David tweet, but also to even more disgusting things like Trump's remark to Jewish Republicans that "most of you probably don't like me because I don't want your money"). Violence is exploding both ways in a way that is not unlike the Long Hot Summers, and unless the root causes are addressed, it will not be solved but only temporarily supressed. Cheap rhetoric, like the quote from brenski I mentioned above, will only cause more harm, because it deflects attention from real problems towards easy strawmen (like all the current political demagoguery, from Geert Wilders and Marine LePen to Nigel Farage and the Brexit). Populism, nationalism, demagoguery, conspiracy theories - these are a threat to everyone. |
Costa86 09.07.2016 08:55 |
Alex Jones is a delusional, manipulative, cretin, who doubles as a snake oil salesman. He actually peddles products which are supposed to detoxify you etc. on his YouTube shows (which seem to be updated a million times a day). He's beyond being a conspiracy theorist - he deliberately agitates and misinforms, under the guise of providing "the truth". |
Saint Jiub 09.07.2016 10:32 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: "anarchists and marxists" As soon as you read that, you know you can stop reading. Extremism begets extremism, violence begets violence. The USA is still suffering from the same problems as in the '50s/'60s, and those were the same problems as under Reconstruction (1865-1877) - the Civil War is still not completely over, and I don't see it ending anytime soon. Despite the fact that equality under the law is mostly a legal fact now (there are still many loopholes that allow for discrimination), REAL equality is not. Racism is still a tool used by the powererful to get the support of poor whites against their own interests - the Donald Trump campaign is illustrating that, and it is not markedly different from the politics of the Redeemer Democrats, wealthy ex-confederates who represented the interests of the rich to the detriment of the poor (both black and white), during the late Reconstruction era. During the Obama-presidency, much racist sentiment that was hidden from view during most of the '80s, '90s and '00s resurfaced in full view - white supremacists have become more visible in politics once more, as they were until the late '60s and early '70s The Trump-campaign is overtly race-baiting, both anti-black, anti-Islamic and now even anti-semitic (and I'm not just referring to the star-of-David tweet, but also to even more disgusting things like Trump's remark to Jewish Republicans that "most of you probably don't like me because I don't want your money"). Violence is exploding both ways in a way that is not unlike the Long Hot Summers, and unless the root causes are addressed, it will not be solved but only temporarily supressed. Cheap rhetoric, like the quote from brenski I mentioned above, will only cause more harm, because it deflects attention from real problems towards easy strawmen (like all the current political demagoguery, from Geert Wilders and Marine LePen to Nigel Farage and the Brexit). Populism, nationalism, demagoguery, conspiracy theories - these are a threat to everyone. Thanks for the drivel Dr Quinn. |
brENsKi 09.07.2016 17:10 |
Panchgani wrote:exactly. Casper's favourite sport - talking down at everyone here - with his "i know everything about everything since forever" crapthomasquinn 32989 wrote: "anarchists and marxists" As soon as you read that, you know you can stop reading. Extremism begets extremism, violence begets violence. The USA is still suffering from the same problems as in the '50s/'60s, and those were the same problems as under Reconstruction (1865-1877) - the Civil War is still not completely over, and I don't see it ending anytime soon. Despite the fact that equality under the law is mostly a legal fact now (there are still many loopholes that allow for discrimination), REAL equality is not. Racism is still a tool used by the powererful to get the support of poor whites against their own interests - the Donald Trump campaign is illustrating that, and it is not markedly different from the politics of the Redeemer Democrats, wealthy ex-confederates who represented the interests of the rich to the detriment of the poor (both black and white), during the late Reconstruction era. During the Obama-presidency, much racist sentiment that was hidden from view during most of the '80s, '90s and '00s resurfaced in full view - white supremacists have become more visible in politics once more, as they were until the late '60s and early '70s The Trump-campaign is overtly race-baiting, both anti-black, anti-Islamic and now even anti-semitic (and I'm not just referring to the star-of-David tweet, but also to even more disgusting things like Trump's remark to Jewish Republicans that "most of you probably don't like me because I don't want your money"). Violence is exploding both ways in a way that is not unlike the Long Hot Summers, and unless the root causes are addressed, it will not be solved but only temporarily supressed. Cheap rhetoric, like the quote from brenski I mentioned above, will only cause more harm, because it deflects attention from real problems towards easy strawmen (like all the current political demagoguery, from Geert Wilders and Marine LePen to Nigel Farage and the Brexit). Populism, nationalism, demagoguery, conspiracy theories - these are a threat to everyone.Thanks for the drivel Dr Quinn. you know what Casper? you could also be wrong you know, also strange how you always preach your left-wing, anti-capitalist gospel, but NEVER offer any kind of workable solution. the world has no time for your kind of "holier-than-thou-but-actually-do-f***-all-about-anything" for someone supposedly learned and intellectual...you know surprisingly little about surprisingly less. get your head out of your textbooks and spend some time in the real world |
Saint Jiub 10.07.2016 13:39 |
"get your head out of your textbooks and spend some time in the real world" But he has a government job ... Doesn't that count as the real world? LOL |
brENsKi 10.07.2016 16:39 |
Panchgani wrote: "get your head out of your textbooks and spend some time in the real world" But he has a government job ... Doesn't that count as the real world? LOLhaha. in Casper's left-wing egalitarian (but not if you're white!) world - ALL of those tweets were false postings made by pro-gun-whites who want to fan the flames. he's far too clever but equally unreasoned to see that those tweets were genuine and the "pigs in blankets" and "let's fry some bacon" comments originate from the very people he says need further protection and in his world would be above the law #stupidhypocritcalmoronics |
YourValentine 11.07.2016 03:14 |
This conversation is typical for any other discussion you see these days. Whataboutisms and insults. I say police violence you say black vs black murder. It's hopeless. |
Mr.Jingles 11.07.2016 06:10 |
brENsKi wrote: both sides are as bad as each other it no longer matters what the origins or noble objectives of a cause now hijacked by anarchists and marxists. it's all fucked in the head now. linkI seriously wouldn't quote anything from Infowars as a reliable source of information. For those who know Alex Jones, he's a paranoid conspiracy theorist who believes the 9/11 attacks were 100% an inside job. |
Mr.Jingles 11.07.2016 06:12 |
Costa86 wrote: Alex Jones is a delusional, manipulative, cretin, who doubles as a snake oil salesman. He actually peddles products which are supposed to detoxify you etc. on his YouTube shows (which seem to be updated a million times a day). He's beyond being a conspiracy theorist - he deliberately agitates and misinforms, under the guise of providing "the truth".I couldn't agree more. You might as well quote The Onion as a truthful information source over Info Wars. |
thomasquinn 32989 11.07.2016 07:31 |
How typical. Slurs and ad-hominem attacks from Brenski and Panchgani, sprinkled with some conspiracy theories and half a dozen strawman fallacies where Brenski puts words in my mouth, but conveniently ignores everything I wrote. And still, as in the Brexit discussion which followed a similar course, Brenski insists he represents "the real world", and everything that doesn't conform to his views is dismissed off-hand. How is it possible to have a reasonable discussion when this is the response given to anyone who doesn't unconditionally agree with your views, Brenski? You write "you know what Casper? you could also be wrong you know". But Brenski - do you see the irony in that statement? Because YOU refuse to accept that you could be wrong about anything, launching into the most hostile verbal attacks when challenged on any point, by anyone. You no longer listen to arguments, your mind is made up, and anyone who does not agree with you 100% is wrong, "hypocritical", "moronic", "marxist", "anarchist". I'm fairly sure you still consider yourself a moderate, Brenski. But you are not - you are fast becoming an extremist. That's worrying, because I know for a fact that you're not stupid. Why are you no longer willing to even consider the possibility that people on the other side of the fence are well-intentioned and decent human beings who simply happen to disagree with you, sometimes to a greater and sometimes to a lesser extent? |
thomasquinn 32989 11.07.2016 07:36 |
Mr.Jingles wrote:Costa86 wrote: Alex Jones is a delusional, manipulative, cretin, who doubles as a snake oil salesman. He actually peddles products which are supposed to detoxify you etc. on his YouTube shows (which seem to be updated a million times a day). He's beyond being a conspiracy theorist - he deliberately agitates and misinforms, under the guise of providing "the truth".I couldn't agree more. You might as well quote The Onion as a truthful information source over Info Wars. Agreed. Sadly, with people becoming more critical of "main stream media" (and to some extent rightly so), many are now uncritically believing anything they find on "alternative media", especially if it fits in with their preconceptions. I've been a regular visitor to snopes.com for years (if you don't know it, it's a fact-checking website that looks into rumours, urban legends and the like), and the past year or two, the number of fake news stories going viral has completely exploded. In some cases, they're malicious hoaxes or really nasty propaganda from extremist groups, but very often, they're clearly identifiable satirical stories that people nevertheless fall for by the busload. It seems to me that a large group of people believes that being critical means disbelieving everything that sounds official and believing everything that doesn't. |
Oscar J 11.07.2016 07:38 |
Actually I think reading a few text books wouldn't hurt in your case Brenski. It would probably open you up to new perspectives and ways of thinking, and maybe you'd learn a thing or two about using reliable sources to support your views better. This widespread despise of the educated is sad. |
brENsKi 11.07.2016 10:39 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:How typical. Slurs and ad-hominem attacks from Brenski and Panchgani, sprinkled with some conspiracy theories and half a dozen strawman fallacies where Brenski puts words in my mouth, but conveniently ignores everything I wrote.firstly, I have NEVER put words in your mouth - you do that yourself - and far too many of 'em to boot. the twitter posts were genuine. and THAT is the hate-filled crap that has hijacked the BLM campaign. You brush off the truth when it doesn't fit your agenda. how predictably wank of you. thomasquinn 32989 wrote:And still, as in the Brexit discussion which followed a similar course, Brenski insists he represents "the real world", and everything that doesn't conform to his views is dismissed off-hand. How is it possible to have a reasonable discussion when this is the response given to anyone who doesn't unconditionally agree with your views, Brenski?you talk utter crap. I have no issue with debate and discussion. the whole point of the Brexit debate is that YOU and many others refuse to accept the outcome of a democratic majority. you'd be happy for the UK to keep voting til we get what YOU want. have YOU any idea how patheitc that sounds? let's give you an idea. I've voted in EVERY UK general election since 1983. In all but TWO of them I did not get the Govt I voted for - do i complain? - no because that's how fucking democracy works thomasquinn 32989 wrote:You write "you know what Casper? you could also be wrong you know". But Brenski - do you see the irony in that statement? Because YOU refuse to accept that you could be wrong about anything, launching into the most hostile verbal attacks when challenged on any point, by anyone.Again - i haven't been hostile toward you. quite the opposite. I've disagreed with you reasonably. - which is totally unlike yourself - whoagain has made things personal. you did as much a year ago and got really nasty and personal and insulting, but surprise surfuckingprise, our left-wing mods did nothing to make you either withdraw your comment or apologise. thomasquinn 32989 wrote: You no longer listen to arguments, your mind is made up, and anyone who does not agree with you 100% is wrong, "hypocritical", "moronic", "marxist", "anarchist". I'm fairly sure you still consider yourself a moderate, Brenski. But you are not - you are fast becoming an extremist. That's worrying, because I know for a fact that you're not stupid. Why are you no longer willing to even consider the possibility that people on the other side of the fence are well-intentioned and decent human beings who simply happen to disagree with you, sometimes to a greater and sometimes to a lesser extent?again you don't know me. and i am not "becoming anything" - and how fucking dare you label me anything. as i said before you offer comment on everything, but your-splinter-filled arse NEVER provides any kind of solution. Brexit is so much better than anything YOU can come up with Casper, because at least it allows Britain to shape it's own future. if this is how your bleeding heart is reacting now, god help you when your country (the Netherlands) votes to leave the EU next year. I'll leave you with this: Casper you're an insufferable self-righteous hand-wringer. you do nothing about nothing and (to bastardise someone greater) you're a man who knows the theory of everything and the reality of nothing. You sir, are an insulting and odious little prick. |
The Real Wizard 11.07.2016 11:14 |
brENsKi wrote: linkNo matter what is being discussed - infowars is not a valid source. It is a conspiracy website, full stop. Once in a blue moon it gets something right. But even a broken clock is right twice a day. Always seek another source. |
brENsKi 11.07.2016 11:21 |
The Real Wizard wrote:and you're guilty of the same mistake as Casper. brush something away rather than discuss the ACTUAL issue.brENsKi wrote: linkNo matter what is being discussed - infowars is not a valid source. It is a conspiracy website, full stop. Once in a blue moon it gets something right. But even a broken clock is right twice a day. Always seek another source. the fact a site has got other stuff wrong doesn't make the twitter comments lies does it? i may have to resort to "Gerryisms" to get my acct removed, as i really want out of here BECAUSE of people like Casper. but Barbara won't oblige and delete my account for me what kind of site makes it impossible for a forum member to close/delete their own account? this sh*t one - that's what. |
thomasquinn 32989 11.07.2016 12:35 |
"firstly, I have NEVER put words in your mouth", Brenski opens. Only to follow it, a mere two lines plus a quote down, with: "the whole point of the Brexit debate is that YOU and many others refuse to accept the outcome of a democratic majority. you'd be happy for the UK to keep voting til we get what YOU want." Funny. I didn't post on that topic - not ONCE. So all of the above is words put into my mouth, by you, in the same post where you claim never to do that. You and Panchgani added to it considerably in your next set of posts, but I think the point is amply supported already.
Then Brenski proceeds: "Again - i haven't been hostile toward you. quite the opposite. I've disagreed with you reasonably. - which is totally unlike yourself - whoagain has made things personal."
From this very topic, and I've had to edit hard to keep it down to just the bare essentials: "Casper's favourite sport - talking down at everyone here - with his "i know everything about everything since forever" crap", "your kind of "holier-than-thou-but-actually-do-f***-all-about-anything", "for someone supposedly learned and intellectual...you know surprisingly little about surprisingly less.", "he's far too clever but equally unreasoned to see that those tweets were genuine and the "pigs in blankets" and "let's fry some bacon" comments originate from the very people he says need further protection and in his world would be above the law #stupidhypocritcalmoronics". And, of course, the most reasonable, un-hostile and impersonal of all: "Casper you're an insufferable self-righteous hand-wringer. you do nothing about nothing and (to bastardise someone greater) you're a man who knows the theory of everything and the reality of nothing. You sir, are an insulting and odious little prick."
Sadly, Brenski will not leave it at that. So here, unedited, the PM he sent to try and belittle me a bit further:
Casper i honestly don't care what YOU do about this PM. I've had it with you and you mindful mindlessness. i can see that YOU'RE always going to claim to be better and suprior to everyone else. I'm not the only one you've had run-ins with - Pitrek doesn't visit much these days either, and I had a few months off last year to withdraw from your cr*p. anyhow, i've asked Barbara to delete my account (for the third time) - she says she can't (won't) but she closed Gerry's acct didn't she? As i said, had enough of your cr*p. so find someone else to talk down to - shame the site membership doesn't realise what an insignificant, hand-wringing odious dick you really are. perhaps people like being talked down to and insulted. - well now i'm insulting you. enjoy it. anyone can talk theory the way you do. some of us have real practical life experience to call on. on a lighter note - if Barb doesn't remove my account soon, i WILL resort to some imaginative profanity - all aimed at yourself - in order to get myself deleted - and the f*ck away from you and your inane sermons. they say "those that can, do. and those that can't, teach" - you'd make a great teacher....lol now shove your lectures, you unintelligent little smart-bollocks So there you have it, cool and collected, civil and detached, not hostile - quite the opposite - but reasonable, unlike myself. |
Oscar J 11.07.2016 12:52 |
O.o |
Saint Jiub 11.07.2016 18:01 |
Were the tweets Brenski linked inaccurate? |
Costa86 12.07.2016 06:32 |
Wow, that escalated quickly. And I'm not sure why. We all have differences of opinion. On certain subjects, we feel very strongly one way or another. I feel very strongly about Brexit for instance, and I am convinced it was a big mistake which has already started having dire consequences. And I say this because I care for the UK and want the best for it and all its citizens. But I'm not getting back into that. A hallmark of Britishness is the ability to make a reasoned argument without getting all hot and bothered. I hail from Malta, and, living in Britain, I can see the difference in the way people discuss things. In Malta, being prone to the usual Southern Mediterranean stereotypes, people raise their voice easily and get all flushed and sweaty. But the British are generally able to get their point across without the histrionics. Which is why I am surprised at Brenski and the unexpectedly very abrasive tone this discussion has taken. It's normal to feel aggrieved, but it's only a civilised discussion for Christ's sake. We're not the guys getting shot and killed here. And why would you want your account deleted? Your contributions generally add to the topics discussed, both in the Queen and Peronal sections. There's no need to get upset. We all have our own styles of discussion. What is important is that we never belittle anyone - especially not anyone who is making reasoned arguments, even if we don't agree one bit with them. Name calling really brings down the level of discussion. Many of the people on this forum seem to be highly intelligent, so I would not expect to see, in the context of a reasoned discussion, the kind of name-calling you find in YouTube comments. Sometimes when we are angry, it is best not to write anything. I have many a time written something in anger and then deleted it, and then reapproached the matter a few hours later, and written something in a calmer and less abrasive tone. |
brENsKi 12.07.2016 07:35 |
then perhaps you need to look at ThomasQuinn's motives? why would anyone post the contents of a Private Message - other than to belittle and stir up hate toward a person. I did the right thing taking the spat between me and TQ to PM - he escalated things by posting that PM here. he constantly manipulates situations (ask Pitrek). and why is it that my account has still not been removed - despite my asking several times? i don't want to be in any situation where i may be provoked into responding to a TQ attack - but mods here have done nothing....even not bothering to ask him to remove the contents of my PM. so - I'm asking again - for the SIXTH time YV (Barbara) please remove my account now. thank you |
Mr.Jingles 12.07.2016 11:54 |
The Real Wizard wrote:I remember once Alex Jones went on Howard Stern, and he started talking about how the Vietnam War was started by a false flag operation, and even if you didn't agree with him you wondered if there was any possibility that it could be true, but then he started talking about how the Royal Family is linked to vampires from Transylvania, and his whole credibility went out the window.brENsKi wrote: linkNo matter what is being discussed - infowars is not a valid source. It is a conspiracy website, full stop. Once in a blue moon it gets something right. But even a broken clock is right twice a day. Always seek another source. |
Saint Jiub 12.07.2016 13:26 |
Typical. Six posts in this topic automatically dismiss the tweets because they come from "Infowars", yet the QZ leftist extremists cannot bother commenting on the content of the tweets. Incidentally, I believe these two deaths (Minnesota and Louisiana) could have been avoided with better Police training. Both cops were rattled in fear for their lives as both victims had guns for self-protection. The Louisiana case seems worse to me in that it started with excessive force, and then the cop shot the victim in frustration because the man did not play possum. It would be nice if the cops could express remorse and admit over-reaction/negligence, but the crappy US jackpot American legal system precludes any expression of honesty. |
Saint Jiub 12.07.2016 13:28 |
oops |
Saint Jiub 12.07.2016 13:28 |
oops |
Mr.Jingles 12.07.2016 14:05 |
Panchgani wrote: Typical. Six posts in this topic automatically dismiss the tweets because they come from "Infowars", yet the QZ leftist extremists cannot bother commenting on the content of the tweets. Incidentally, I believe these two deaths (Minnesota and Louisiana) could have been avoided with better Police training. Both cops were rattled in fear for their lives as both victims had guns for self-protection. The Louisiana case seems worse to me in that it started with excessive force, and then the cop shot the victim in anger/frustration because the man did not play possum. It would be nice if the cops could express remorse and admit over-reaction/negligence, but the crappy US jackpot American legal system precludes any expression of honesty.The death of Philando Castile is far more disturbing, because he didn't have any criminal record, and his only violations were traffic related (which we all have had at some point). He was also a legal gun owner who notified the cop that he had one, along with a permit, but the cop still shot him anyways. Many NRA members are actually criticizing the NRA itself for not speaking out and defending Castile as a legal gun owner. |
Saint Jiub 12.07.2016 21:17 |
I find the Louisiana death more disturbing because the deliberate cold blooded killing was a crime of passion, and the cop is definitely to blame. In baseball, all lives matter. Eh? |
Saint Jiub 12.07.2016 21:28 |
The lamestream liberal press makes excuses when "Black Lives Matter" provokes violence: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/10/01/dont-criticize-black-lives-matter-for-provoking-violence-the-civil-rights-movement-did-too/ "dont-criticize-black-lives-matter-for-provoking-violence" |
Saint Jiub 12.07.2016 22:41 |
http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/daily-southtown/news/ct-sta-palos-home-invasion-shooting-charges-st-0708-20160707-story.html White thug lives don't matter |
The Real Wizard 16.07.2016 01:30 |
Panchgani wrote: Typical. Six posts in this topic automatically dismiss the tweets because they come from "Infowars", yet the QZ leftist extremists cannot bother commenting on the content of the tweets.Obviously the tweets are deplorable. It's no different from people in the middle east who were celebrating 9/11. But the bias of many on the right really shows when they're more focused on those tweets than on the police who are killing black people. And of course the left isn't talking about the tweets and is just focused on the cops. It's just becoming all too predictable. But alas, this is the product of a system polarized into only two political parties, where far too many members of the electorate are left with the impression that there are only two possible ways to think, leading to this constant low level hum of two distinctly different narratives offering no actual solutions. Rinse, lather and repeat. Cue the next major shooting to happen a few days from now. |
The Real Wizard 16.07.2016 01:33 |
Panchgani wrote: It would be nice if the cops could express remorse and admit over-reaction/negligence, but the crappy US jackpot American legal system precludes any expression of honesty.Indeed - that's a huge part of the problem. And so is this: link There are countless stories like this, and no doubt the overwhelming majority of good cops are aware of them. I do not envy their position. |
YourValentine 16.07.2016 03:24 |
I accidentally watched of the murder of that black kid in a video on my facebook timeline. I don't understand how anyone cannot feel the hot burning rage and anger, I certainly felt it. But I am not the victim, I am not black and not American, so I could let my brain win over the emotion and I can think about such police violence without hatred and emotion. However, I also saw a video of the black United States senator Scott who told his audience how he had been pulled over by the police in his car 7 times in a year, how police officers did not accept his pin that shows he is a US senator but asked his ID with "an attitude" and how many apologies he already received from superiors of police officers. There IS a racial issue in police and if you are black and if you live with the fear and the humiliation of everyday racism, you simply cannot be cool about it - you simply want to be accepted as an equal human being - finally. After all the police officers are paid with your tax money, as well and they are armed and a constant threat for you. Of course there are other things: members of BLM can be aggressive and violent, police officers may live in fear, they may be underpaid and underfunded. There is the issue of 300 million fire arms in the country and that every officer has to fear that the citizen in front of him can pull out a gun any second. This is all true but it does not change the fact that there is a racial problem and a violence problem with the police. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible to discuss it with all the emotions and the unsolved relationship between the races. White people simply cannot feel the endless frustration of a black person and they tend to talk down the issue with whataboutisms thus increasing the frustration and aggression. If only people could walk in the shoes of another person for one day, things would definitely improve. |
The Real Wizard 16.07.2016 04:11 |
YourValentine wrote: However, I also saw a video of the black United States senator Scott who told his audience how he had been pulled over by the police in his car 7 times in a year, how police officers did not accept his pin that shows he is a US senator but asked his ID with "an attitude" and how many apologies he already received from superiors of police officers. There IS a racial issue in police and if you are black and if you live with the fear and the humiliation of everyday racism, you simply cannot be cool about it - you simply want to be accepted as an equal human being - finally. After all the police officers are paid with your tax money, as well and they are armed and a constant threat for you.It happens in Canada, too. A black city councilor was recently carded while standing at a bus stop by a cop who didn't know who he was. In Toronto over a quarter of carding incidents are on black males while they make up only 8% of the population. Racial profiling is tragically still very much a thing. |
Saint Jiub 17.07.2016 16:01 |
The town where I work (suburban Geneva Illinois), has a history of AWB events (arrested while black). A few years ago, a group of four black men were arrested and taken downtown for carpooling to work from the south side of Chicago. Our manufacturing vice president had to go downtown and bail the four guys out of jail. |
YourValentine 18.07.2016 04:43 |
Now the murder of police officers in Baton Rouge - the same city where the kid had been killed. Like in Dallas the killer was an ex US army/marine member. Someone who learned to kill as a profession, someone who was told that he was doing a "service" to his country shooting people in a country that never attacked the USA. What makes an ex-Marine shoot police officers at home? Does he feel he was used and lied to when he was risking his own life in a war that never concerned him personally? Was he angered like mad when he saw that black people at home were shot with no consequences by law enforcement whlle they were just good enough to risk their lives in Iraq - a country that never did any harm to his country? We have to ask these questions to break the spirale of death, it has to be done with honesty. There must be an effort by the whole society looking into the issue with no prejudice and not trying to make a political gain out of it. It is vital to ask why people have come to stop talking to each other and only look at each other with a gun in their hands. I just read in a paper that the Republican party has asked the governor of Ohio to stop the "open carry" rule for the Republican convention, they feel threatened by all these people with guns in their hands. It's so bizzarre, you would not believe it if it happened in a Hollywood movie. |
The Real Wizard 18.07.2016 11:44 |
YourValentine wrote: We have to ask these questions to break the spirale of death, it has to be done with honesty. There must be an effort by the whole society looking into the issue with no prejudice and not trying to make a political gain out of it. It is vital to ask why people have come to stop talking to each other and only look at each other with a gun in their hands.There are millions upon millions of people who will say "but the gub'mint gonna come take my gun." And there ends the dialogue, full stop. A friend of mine lost her brother to suicide, using the father's gun. The day after his son killed himself, the father asked the police - "where's my gun?" THAT right there is what's wrong with America. This idea that the second amendment of the constitution is of any value, never mind being somehow comparable to your own child's life. It is so deeply ingrained in the culture that any change to the laws would likely lead to a full-scale revolution. But the culture of fear is a thing. Even in the best cities, countless people walk their streets with guns with the feeling that the person walking past them might want to rob them or kill them. And for millions of people in poor communities, a gun is literally the only way to protect your family from the gangsters who live across the street. But my friend's dad wasn't one of them - he's a multi millionaire in Vegas. Yet he still feels he needs his gun too. One has to ask how the US managed to acquire this mentality to begin with. There are so many things that make the US different from every other developed country. They have the highest incarceration rate in the world. They have virtually no public sector, and thus no regulations on anything from health care to leasing an apartment. And the religious right is so strong that it has come close to eliminating science in some states. How did the US become so different? Few people know the answer to this question. But even answering it won't lead to anything changing. The fact that this is the same country with magnificent national parks, the country who is a world leader in science and technology - it really does baffle the mind. I love visiting it and exploring it, but I get to leave, and I'm always happy to come home to a place where I can walk down the streets at night without being afraid of anything. |
*goodco* 19.07.2016 11:18 |
And what causes bombings in Syria and Pakistan and Turkey and France and Belgium, mass shootings in Paris and Orlando and..... stabbings in Germany, etc. Ignorance and hate and brainwashing and mental unbalance and social media and.......... |
The Real Wizard 20.07.2016 12:57 |
*goodco* wrote: And what causes bombings in Syria and Pakistan and Turkey and France and Belgium, mass shootings in Paris and Orlando and..... stabbings in Germany, etc. Ignorance and hate and brainwashing and mental unbalance and social media and..........And the Bush administration. By medding in middle eastern affairs (without UN approval, no less), they created ISIS. Before 9/11 the enemy was a small group of guys in a cave called Al-Qaeda. Now it's a giant movement of people who are stationed all over the world, and they are angry because they feel their way of life is under threat. Had the US and its allies stayed out, things would not have escalated to this point. Being the world police does have its drawbacks, and we're seeing the results now. |
YourValentine 20.07.2016 14:30 |
The Real Wizard wrote: There are millions upon millions of people who will say "but the gub'mint gonna come take my gun." And there ends the dialogue, full stop. A friend of mine lost her brother to suicide, using the father's gun. The day after his son killed himself, the father asked the police - "where's my gun?" THAT right there is what's wrong with America. This idea that the second amendment of the constitution is of any value, never mind being somehow comparable to your own child's life. It is so deeply ingrained in the culture that any change to the laws would likely lead to a full-scale revolution. But the culture of fear is a thing. Even in the best cities, countless people walk their streets with guns with the feeling that the person walking past them might want to rob them or kill them. And for millions of people in poor communities, a gun is literally the only way to protect your family from the gangsters who live across the street. But my friend's dad wasn't one of them - he's a multi millionaire in Vegas. Yet he still feels he needs his gun too. One has to ask how the US managed to acquire this mentality to begin with. There are so many things that make the US different from every other developed country. They have the highest incarceration rate in the world. They have virtually no public sector, and thus no regulations on anything from health care to leasing an apartment. And the religious right is so strong that it has come close to eliminating science in some states. How did the US become so different? Few people know the answer to this question. But even answering it won't lead to anything changing. The fact that this is the same country with magnificent national parks, the country who is a world leader in science and technology - it really does baffle the mind. I love visiting it and exploring it, but I get to leave, and I'm always happy to come home to a place where I can walk down the streets at night without being afraid of anything.I completetly agree with everything you say. It's really scary. |
greaserkat 21.07.2016 10:44 |
Aaannnddddd, one more... link |
ParisNair 25.07.2016 11:16 |
The Real Wizard wrote: And the Bush administration. By medding in middle eastern affairs (without UN approval, no less), they created ISIS. Before 9/11 the enemy was a small group of guys in a cave called Al-Qaeda. Now it's a giant movement of people who are stationed all over the world, and they are angry because they feel their way of life is under threat. Had the US and its allies stayed out, things would not have escalated to this point. Being the world police does have its drawbacks, and we're seeing the results now.I'm sure you don't really believe its as simple as that. 9/11 was not the first terrorist attack on the US soil. Neverthess, are you suggesting the US should have, post 9/11, just taken a deep breath and let it go? Would that have made USA a safer place? |
thomasquinn 32989 26.07.2016 04:35 |
There's a big difference between taking "a deep breath and let[ting] it go" and "invading Iraq and destabilizing the entire region without any real justification". It's a little thing called "nuance". |
Mr.Jingles 26.07.2016 07:15 |
|
ParisNair 26.07.2016 11:22 |
TQ - in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 USA rained fire on Afghanistan, not Iraq. I was referring to that, and not Gulf War 2. In all the years that Bush was President post-9/11 there were hardly any terror attacks in the USA. Can't say the same about Obama. In every conflict the USA has been involved in, there have been local players who collaborated with them. They just took advantage of the volatile situation, or different aspirations of a large part of the populace.Nevertheless, it is obvious that USA could have done a much better job with the way they went about "spreading Democracy" in all those countries they invaded in the last 20 years or so. Obama needs to share the blame for it along with Bush. |
Saint Jiub 26.07.2016 18:27 |
The Real Wizard wrote:And the Bush administration. By medding in middle eastern affairs (without UN approval, no less), they created ISIS. ......... The Anbar Awakening in 2007 had the Sunnis in Iraq rebelling successfully against Al Qaeda. Isis was created on Obama's watch after he took office in 2008. |
The Real Wizard 08.08.2016 16:25 |
Panchgani wrote:Holy revisionist history.The Real Wizard wrote:......... The Anbar Awakening in 2007 had the Sunnis in Iraq rebelling successfully against Al Qaeda. Isis was created on Obama's watch after he took office in 2008.And the Bush administration. By medding in middle eastern affairs (without UN approval, no less), they created ISIS. The formation of ISIS was a slow and steady progression over the last 15 years. Partisan rhetoric doesn't suddenly change that. |
Saint Jiub 08.08.2016 19:11 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Panchgani wrote:Holy revisionist history. The formation of ISIS was a slow and steady progression over the last 15 years. Partisan rhetoric doesn't suddenly change that.The Real Wizard wrote:......... The Anbar Awakening in 2007 had the Sunnis in Iraq rebelling successfully against Al Qaeda. Isis was created on Obama's watch after he took office in 2008.And the Bush administration. By medding in middle eastern affairs (without UN approval, no less), they created ISIS. ... I Googled "Anbar awakening US withdrawal" and found a few lamestream articles. Unfortunately, none were from info wars or Fox News - LOL In 2010, Al Qaida was on the run with only a few true believers scattered throughout Iraq. In 2011, Obama withdrew from Iraq, and Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki, free from American influence, proceeded with widespread repression of the Iraqi Sunni's. ... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-wp-iraq-analysis-3b71cc14-37bc-11e6-a254-2b336e293a3c-20160621-story.html "The second setback for al-Qaida in Iraq was "the surge" beginning in January 2007, when President George W. Bush increased the number of troops across Iraq when American popular opinion called for a pullout from the conflict. This new military offensive capitalized on the political success of the Anbar Awakening and reinforced it across the country. Masri and his organization would continue to fight coalition troops and terrorize Iraqis for three more years. But by the time of his death in 2010, the coalition's price tag on Masri's head had dropped from $5 million to a paltry $100,000. Al-Qaida in Iraq was on the run, with only a few true believers scattered throughout the country. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, however, would wreck the atmosphere of inclusiveness we had worked so painstakingly to create. The day after the U.S. withdrawal in December 2011, Maliki repeated the worst of the CPA's actions and began alienating the Sunni minority by trumping up charges against Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi, purging competent Sunni leaders from the military and government positions and sending the Iraqi Army into Anbar province to kill "terrorists" - which by his definition meant Sunnis. The rise of the Islamic State is directly attributable to Maliki's ill-fated decisions during this period." ... http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/02/george-w-bush-iraq-anbar-115155 "Late in the evening of Sunday, January 18, an eleven-member delegation of tribal leaders from Iraq’s western Anbar Province arrived in Washington, D.C. Just as their plane was touching down, Islamic State units back in Iraq attacked the compound of one of the delegation’s senior leaders, Sheik Ahmed Abu Risha, killing nine Iraqi police officers and wounding 28 of the sheik’s guards. A nearby Iraqi military unit failed to respond to repeated calls for help. The brutal attack underscored the purpose of the Anbar delegation’s visit: The tribal leaders believed that they could defeat the Islamic State—but only if the Obama administration would agree to ship them weapons directly, bypassing Iraq’s untrustworthy Ministry of Defense." ... http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/13/world/meast/iraq-anbar-violence-holmes/ "The groundwork for today's problems began almost as soon as that last American convoy left in 2011. Sunni lawmakers protested the rounding up of many of their aides and security guards, and the country's vice president -- top Sunni leader Tariq al-Hashimi -- faced arrest and later fled the country. The government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki was supposed to usher in a political era of inclusion and reconciliation. His critics say those first days after the American departure were a signal of opposite intentions that have continued to this day." |
*goodco* 09.08.2016 09:05 |
As always, they left out one pretty significant fact: In 2008 George W. Bush signed the U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement. It included a deadline of 31 December 2011, before which "all the United States Forces shall withdraw from all Iraqi territory". The last U.S. troops left Iraq on 18 December 2011, in accordance with this agreement. US Forces, in the form of air support, resumed operations in Iraq in June 2014, to defend it against ISIL. |
Saint Jiub 09.08.2016 10:33 |
*goodco* wrote: As always, they left out one pretty significant fact: In 2008 George W. Bush signed the U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement. It included a deadline of 31 December 2011, before which "all the United States Forces shall withdraw from all Iraqi territory". The last U.S. troops left Iraq on 18 December 2011, in accordance with this agreement. US Forces, in the form of air support, resumed operations in Iraq in June 2014, to defend it against ISIL.... The agreement could have been renegotiated as conditions deteriorated from 2008 to 2011. However, Obama's passive, hands-off approach left al Maliki to his own devices. Per Leon Panetta (Obama’s defense secretary from July 2011 to February 2013): "without the President’s active advocacy, al-Maliki was allowed to slip away." ... link Obama had three years to negotiate a new agreement prior to the Dec. 31, 2011, withdrawal date to keep some U.S. troops in Iraq. In fact, a day before Bush signed the agreement, Gen. Ray Odierno — the former commander of the U.S. troops in Iraq and current Army chief of staff — said the agreement might be renegotiated depending on conditions on the ground. “Three years is a very long time,” Odierno told the New York Times. Leon Panetta, who was Obama’s defense secretary from July 2011 to February 2013, wrote in his 2014 book, “Worthy Fights,” that as the deadline neared “it was clear to me — and many others — that withdrawing all our forces would endanger the fragile stability” in Iraq. Panetta wrote that Maliki insisted that a new agreement providing immunity to U.S. forces “would have to be submitted to the Iraqi parliament for its approval,” which Panetta said “made reaching agreement very difficult.” Very difficult, but Panetta wrote it was not impossible. Panetta said the Obama White House did not press hard enough to reach a deal — a point that Bush makes in his speech. Panetta wrote that the U.S. “had leverage” and could have “threatened to withdraw reconstruction aid” if Iraq didn’t agree to “some sort of continued U.S. military presence.” Panetta, “Worthy Fights,” 2014: To my frustration, the White House coordinated the negotiations but never really led them. Officials there seemed content to endorse an agreement if State and Defense could reach one, but without the President’s active advocacy, al-Maliki was allowed to slip away. The deal never materialized. To this day, I believe that a small U.S. troop presence in Iraq could have effectively advised the Iraqi military on how to deal with al-Qaeda’s resurgence and the sectarian violence that has engulfed the country. Clinton campaign’s response that Iraq wouldn’t allow the Obama administration to renegotiate the terms of the withdrawal ignored criticism that Obama didn’t try hard enough. That criticism isn’t just partisan. His own defense secretary said Obama wasn’t actively engaged in the negotiations and allowed the opportunity to “slip away.” |
*goodco* 09.08.2016 19:45 |
And we wouldn't have falsely been in Iraq if ??????? Before you answer, please read Colin Powell's thoughts on the matter. |
Saint Jiub 09.08.2016 21:12 |
Yes ... all because Saddam had an assassination hit ordered on Dubya's daddy. Do Dubya's old sins absolve Obama for his passive hands off approach to Iraq and letting al-Maliki slip away? ... "If we had known the intelligence was wrong, we would not have gone into Iraq. But the intelligence community, all 16 agencies, assured us that it was right," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press." http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/colin-powell-invasion-iraq-badly-flawed-n422566 Regarding Colin Powell ... Is the above what you are talking about??? if not please provide a link. |
*goodco* 10.08.2016 21:52 |
That seems to be almost a 180 from his prior 'statements' I am rather stunned, but have to acknowledge the facts as they are presented. I read some other articles as well today where he stated there were leanings to invading Iraq PRIOR to 9/11. What a total cluster that entire region was, is, and always will be. |
Saint Jiub 10.08.2016 23:02 |
What did he say before? links? |
*goodco* 22.08.2016 12:13 |
Was hoping someone would add to the discussion while I was away in New Mexico and Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Will answer when I get caught up....... |
ParisNair 26.08.2016 06:24 |
American military intervention in the Islamic World did not start with Dubya or 9/11. It did not even start with Gulf War 1. It roughly started with the Soviet Afghan war in 1979. link touches upon this lightly, among other things. |