jondickens1 02.02.2016 11:21 |
link What do we think of this guy's? |
matt z 02.02.2016 11:59 |
I'd go see it just to see things on a big screen. I remember being disappointed in HUNGARIAN RHAPSODY as there were projection problems and the sound was only in stereo and rather low. Don't see any US dates yet. But it's interesting |
BETA215 02.02.2016 12:24 |
^ Projection problems?! Shit, that was a bad theater/cinema! |
Queenman!! 02.02.2016 13:37 |
I have a strong feeling this documentary is a Rags to Rhapsody copy/paste job.... |
matt z 02.02.2016 14:46 |
BETA215 wrote: ^ Projection problems?! Shit, that was a bad theater/cinema!Well the event apparently required a different projector rented from a company. I'd inquired DURING the show as to why it was so low but the previous feature has been loud (road to Rhapsody err whatever the extra feature was) then they told me it WASN'T presented in 5.1 anywhere. (*although I believe it was advertised as such) Hopefully this one is better. The Q+PR theatrical was far better. (Seen both in the San Fernando valley) |
Chief Mouse 02.02.2016 15:17 |
^ I'm pretty sure Budapest was in 5.1 in my country's local cinema. I think I remember 'Now I'm here.. now I'm there..' panning from one side to other somewhere at the back of the cinema behind me. Not sure if I explained well. |
Costa86 02.02.2016 16:56 |
^Lucky both, it didn't show in any theatre anywhere near me (Oxford), so didn't get to see it on the big screen at all. |
Viper 03.02.2016 04:11 |
matt z wrote: I remember being disappointed in HUNGARIAN RHAPSODY as there were projection problems and the sound was only in stereo and rather low.Here in Portugal the audio was rather low also! |
Viper 03.02.2016 04:11 |
Queenman!! wrote: I have a strong feeling this documentary is a Rags to Rhapsody copy/paste job....I feel the exact same thing! |
MackMantilla 04.02.2016 07:50 |
Viper wrote:so do I, after readingQueenman!! wrote: I have a strong feeling this documentary is a Rags to Rhapsody copy/paste job....I feel the exact same thing! "never-before-seen outside the UK" |
jjbluecaps 04.02.2016 10:57 |
I believe... That IF (let's hope it will) Hyde Park be released this year, From Rags To Rhapsody will be on the extras. Very difficult to another documentary 1 hour long come out on DVD. |
Doga 04.02.2016 11:53 |
A question for the experts on tech... They did a few years ago the screening of Wembley. How can they put in a cinema Rainbow, Wembley and now Hammersmith as those shows were taped and not filmed? Wouldn't be it a bunch of pixels in a big cinema screen? And don't misunderstand me, i think it must be a wonderful experience to enjoy Queen in a cinema. |
Nitroboy 04.02.2016 12:51 |
Doga wrote: A question for the experts on tech... They did a few years ago the screening of Wembley. How can they put in a cinema Rainbow, Wembley and now Hammersmith as those shows were taped and not filmed? Wouldn't be it a bunch of pixels in a big cinema screen? And don't misunderstand me, i think it must be a wonderful experience to enjoy Queen in a cinema. It's easy, because pretty much 99% of modern cinemas/theatres use digital projectors. How do you think feature films are presented? Certainly not on film. (They're delivered on encrypted harddrives - I handled one the other day) |
Biggus Dickus 04.02.2016 13:33 |
Nitroboy wrote:I think he meant how the lower quality tape comes across on a big screen. Yeah movies are shown digitally, but they're either sourced from original film or have been shot during the digital age. As a result they always are HD quality, Wembley isn't. And you can't upgrade video tape into real HD.Doga wrote: A question for the experts on tech... They did a few years ago the screening of Wembley. How can they put in a cinema Rainbow, Wembley and now Hammersmith as those shows were taped and not filmed? Wouldn't be it a bunch of pixels in a big cinema screen? And don't misunderstand me, i think it must be a wonderful experience to enjoy Queen in a cinema.It's easy, because pretty much 99% of modern cinemas/theatres use digital projectors. How do you think feature films are presented? Certainly not on film. (They're delivered on encrypted harddrives - I handled one the other day) |
Doga 04.02.2016 14:50 |
Biggus Dickus wrote:Exactly my point.Nitroboy wrote:I think he meant how the lower quality tape comes across on a big screen. Yeah movies are shown digitally, but they're either sourced from original film or have been shot during the digital age. As a result they always are HD quality, Wembley isn't. And you can't upgrade video tape into real HD.Doga wrote: A question for the experts on tech... They did a few years ago the screening of Wembley. How can they put in a cinema Rainbow, Wembley and now Hammersmith as those shows were taped and not filmed? Wouldn't be it a bunch of pixels in a big cinema screen? And don't misunderstand me, i think it must be a wonderful experience to enjoy Queen in a cinema.It's easy, because pretty much 99% of modern cinemas/theatres use digital projectors. How do you think feature films are presented? Certainly not on film. (They're delivered on encrypted harddrives - I handled one the other day) |
Chief Mouse 04.02.2016 17:01 |
There won't be pixels because it's projected on the screen with light. It's essentially the the same image you see on your monitor (if it's pixely on the monitor it will be pixely when projected as well and the other way round). The lack of HD content merely will make it look a bit softer though with larger outlines and with less detail overall - you know how it looks on your TV, re Rainbow, Hammersmith. Think of it like this - light has no pixels, it simply enlarges the picture optically (not digitally which means no pixels involved). If you're not sitting in the first row it will absolutely fine. By the way, SD content has already been shown before in cinemas - the short documentary called (I think) The Magic Year which introduced Hungarian Rhapsody. |
Thistle 04.02.2016 18:27 |
Hungarian Rhapsody sound was awful (Cineworld, Glasgow). Too low, and complaints weren't listened to (even though they were louder than the showing itself!!). |
Biggus Dickus 04.02.2016 23:48 |
Chief Mouse wrote: There won't be pixels because it's projected on the screen with light. It's essentially the the same image you see on your monitor (if it's pixely on the monitor it will be pixely when projected as well and the other way round). The lack of HD content merely will make it look a bit softer though with larger outlines and with less detail overall - you know how it looks on your TV, re Rainbow, Hammersmith. Think of it like this - light has no pixels, it simply enlarges the picture optically (not digitally which means no pixels involved). If you're not sitting in the first row it will absolutely fine. By the way, SD content has already been shown before in cinemas - the short documentary called (I think) The Magic Year which introduced Hungarian Rhapsody.Very informative. |
Doga 05.02.2016 11:32 |
Chief Mouse wrote: There won't be pixels because it's projected on the screen with light. It's essentially the the same image you see on your monitor (if it's pixely on the monitor it will be pixely when projected as well and the other way round). The lack of HD content merely will make it look a bit softer though with larger outlines and with less detail overall - you know how it looks on your TV, re Rainbow, Hammersmith. Think of it like this - light has no pixels, it simply enlarges the picture optically (not digitally which means no pixels involved). If you're not sitting in the first row it will absolutely fine. By the way, SD content has already been shown before in cinemas - the short documentary called (I think) The Magic Year which introduced Hungarian Rhapsody.I see, thanks. |
malicedoom 05.02.2016 13:56 |
USA dates, damnit. |
queenfan78.1 10.02.2016 08:16 |
I would check your local cinema. American dates are already advertised through the theatre. It's being shown March 8th. |
malicedoom 12.02.2016 11:53 |
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd it's playing right here in my home town. Sweet. See ya soon, Freddie. |
Nitroboy 12.02.2016 12:20 |
It's playing in Copenhagen too, in March. Unlike Hungarian Rhapsody, I have NO intention of going. I won't even bother telling my parents about this. |
malicedoom 12.02.2016 12:49 |
Why is that? |
Jesme 13.02.2016 02:11 |
It's playing about an hour from me...in Harahan La., at the IMAX. Thinking about taking the 22 year old son who is recovering from a bad ankle injury and a couple of surgeries . He's been laid up since Sept 5 th and just starting to be able to walk so he's pretty stir crazy right about now. We will see how it goes...I can't find anything closer... |
malicedoom 10.03.2016 09:09 |
Saw it Tuesday night. Great stuff. Cool documentary, amazing concert. The theater was playing it so goddamn low they might as well have included fucking sub-titles, but I was used to that from the last time around. Someone went to complain and they moved the volume up from like '2' to '4', when it should have been at '12'. Ah well, still great to see/hear. |
The Real Wizard 10.03.2016 12:22 |
Chief Mouse wrote: ^ I'm pretty sure Budapest was in 5.1 in my country's local cinema. I think I remember 'Now I'm here.. now I'm there..' panning from one side to other somewhere at the back of the cinema behind me. Not sure if I explained well.You're lucky. It was actually mono where I saw it. |
rhapsody8 11.03.2016 01:41 |
Is the documentary exactly same of Looking Back At The Odeon? Or are there any difference? |