QueenZone discussion #1439812

Chief Mouse wrote: Can you post a couple of screenshots? Thanks.

brians wig wrote: Interlaced? Brilliant! Doesn't seem to be seeding though.... I've just finished downloading the 16gb de-interlaced version from Dime and now this pops up! It's amazing that when Q&AL played iHeart radio at the start of the year, only ONE person capped it, yet there's been a few capping Rio, Let's hope it stays that way. The more people at it, the better the chance of not missing anything. There's far too many people who are not prepared to make an effort to record and share.

pittrek wrote: A third version ? Wow :-) Is here somebody who has watched both the dime version and this and can tell me which one is worth downloading ?

terraj wrote:

Chief Mouse wrote: Can you post a couple of screenshots? Thanks.

I've uploaded the sample

brians wig wrote: (damn shame because I prefer interlaced video over de-interlaced anyday).

Chief Mouse wrote:

brians wig wrote: (damn shame because I prefer interlaced video over de-interlaced anyday).

But why? Do you actually prefer to watch videos with horizontal lines? Or you have a CRT monitor / TV? When I watch stuff on my PC those interlace lines are just distracting. They don't add anything to the picture. But if you have a CRT screen then I suppose you don't even see them. Each time I watch something I have to deinterlace it with VLC real-time which is not the best quality option. I rather deinterlace it before hand in Avisynth with a plugin like QTGMC(). I assume you might prefer the smoother picture (re, 25 fps interlaced can be deinterlaced to 50 fps progressive (thus twice as smooth motion) which means NO information lost as there are 2 fields per 1 frame).

brians wig wrote: Terraj. Do you know if this is the actual transmission stream or whether it's been re-encoded to a smaller filesize for 'ease of uploading'?

bootLuca wrote: Yes, it works, but unfortunately the trial version truncates the output file to 15 minutes...

brians wig wrote: Actually, the 16gb is only marginally better I think than this one. Now that I've compared them both on my TV set, there's still plenty of artefacting in the 16gb version. In the opening slow zoom to the stage, if you look at the blue lights between the stage and the orange tower on the left of the screen, the 16gb version looks perfect whilst the 6.8 version has noticible artefacting, BUT once the concert has started, there's plenty of artefacting on both to the degree that one seems little better than the other.

popy wrote: I haven't downloaded yet, but i believe the file is untoched and the source is digital terrestrial television. Normally when recording from DTT the file is in .ts format.

terraj wrote: There is a new video source for Rock in Rio, which is almost BluRay quality visually (audio isn't as good as the one I shared here though). Unfortunately, this was not a live broadcast but an edited one so the channel didn't air all songs. The good news is, I think I can merge the videos from the rebroadcast losslessly via with this 6GB version (I've done a test and it works). Will share whenever I'm done with this project.

brians wig wrote: That would be great, thanks :) Is this new source available to the rest of us anywhere?

Marknow wrote: I would just like to add that had I been directing on the night the live camera angles would have been far superior! Far superior I say!!!!

terraj wrote:

Marknow wrote: I would just like to add that had I been directing on the night the live camera angles would have been far superior! Far superior I say!!!!

No doubt about that ;)