stateside fan 01.03.2015 10:52 |
Wmmr in philadelphia continues to talk as if recording time has been booked with adam Shorty after his record drops.has anyone else heard this? |
Ale Solan 01.03.2015 12:42 |
A new Cosmos Rocks, I shall pass. Hard. |
Biggus Dickus 01.03.2015 12:59 |
I hope not. The Cosmos Rocks was incredibly uninspired and bland. |
anniestu44b 01.03.2015 15:39 |
It won't be another fuckin cosmos rocks! You're all so fuckin depressing! |
matt z 01.03.2015 19:31 |
Well... Cosmos Rocks COULD HAVE had a few good songs with a different set of ears (producer), more dynamics, some rewrites and an ACTUAL BASSIST 1. Time to shine (overall good song, bad flat dynamics, kinda lazy drumming) 2. Voodoo (better vocal delivery/flat mix) 3. Surf's Up, Schools out (RETARDED title/chorus but better than average song with actual dynamics and lively drums) 4. Small (overall a pretty decent album cut) 5. Some things that glitter (lazy vocal delivery imho- sleepy Lullaby song) 6. Warboys (flat mix) 7. C-lebrity (funny, decent lead single even if it sounded like Judas Priest's "a touch of evil" riff) Very little guitar orchestration which is cool and different. Probably my ears ' fault for being a Queen- sound fan. Whatever they do, you know it'll probably still be called QUEEN + even if that's debatable. Probably 3-5 songs to be individually tacked onto SEPARATE re-releases of back catalogue ;-) |
matt z 01.03.2015 19:34 |
^ said. I STILL haven't listened to the album since it's release except once to relive another disappointment (figuring with time and space I could be more objective) |
Ale Solan 01.03.2015 20:25 |
anniestu44b wrote: It won't be another fuckin cosmos rocks! You're all so fuckin depressing!Average loser Queen fan. I'd ask you to get laid if you had 1% chance; unfortunately you have 0% chances. |
winterspelt 01.03.2015 21:54 |
Cosmos Rocks was not a successful album because there were happening many things at the time: Brian busy was doing his tesis, they didnt had a proper bass player, they needed a producer cause its clear that none of them did their work with their usual quality, the relationship with Paul was already doomed, Paul basically didnt enjoyed the recording sessions, etc etc. It seems that they just recorded it because they had a studio recording deal in their contract (this is just my speculation, but after reading and watching many interviews with Brian, Paul and Roger, one can imply they were not very interested in it) also, EMI had their own problems so they kind of didnt cared about the songs. |
Jimmy Dean 01.03.2015 22:46 |
Queen's legacy is firmly in place. Any future album they put out will be welcome by those who choose to welcome it. I didn't like Cosmos Rocks... but who knows, i may enjoy a new one with Adam as fucked up and left wing as that sounds. I mean it's only a bloody record. People get so excited about these things. |
musicland munich 01.03.2015 23:00 |
If they decide to record another album, ok then I 'll give it a listen. Let's see what comes out. Maybe Lambert could give them back some energy and inspiration, who knows.
winterspelt wrote: ...EMI had their own problems so they kind of didnt cared about the songs.They could have sign my band years ago these w@nkers...:) Sorry, I had trouble with water in my basement some years ago, so the condition isn't very good ( just like the Demo we send them). |
anniestu44b 02.03.2015 00:49 |
Ale Solan, How sad are you? Is that the best reply you could think of? Actually I'm quite happily married and get laid Quite regularly actually, maybe you should try it sometime. |
Heavenite 02.03.2015 03:30 |
If there is a new record I'm going to try and take it on face value. Hard to do for a long time Queen fan, but I want to give the thing a fair go. Hope it all be worth the effort! |
The King Of Rhye 02.03.2015 08:34 |
Well..........I've became a fan of Adam since hearing him with Queen, so I am definitely hoping we do see a studio album sometime soon! That said, I do hope it's an actual 'band' album (why not just have Spike, Neil, and Rufus on the whole thing? And even a few guest artists while we're at it......Jeff Beck maybe, Tony Iommi, and so on....) |
andyb1968 02.03.2015 08:56 |
Yes the whole band would be good, but make it a proper Queen album, after all it will probably be the last, lots of harmonies, big guitar orchestration, heavy rock, ballads, quirky stuff job done ! That studio time could be booked to record the new Bond theme by the way. |
matt z 02.03.2015 12:10 |
Sounds appealing andyb. Any inside info on that? Just the opportunity to hear Brian 's red special in surround sound would be appealing. Even IF it had Lambert. He's ridiculous enough to pull off a big theatric thing like that. Couldn't get worse than the unmemorable Bono one or the Chris Cornell one |
Ale Solan 02.03.2015 12:13 |
anniestu44b wrote: Ale Solan, How sad are you? Is that the best reply you could think of? Actually I'm quite happily married and get laid Quite regularly actually, maybe you should try it sometime.Married? Wow, quite stomach your hubbie. Unless you're a hottie, then I could take it back. |
miraclesteinway 02.03.2015 13:07 |
Cosmos Rocks wasn't their finest hour, but neither was Hot Space. Give them a chance to see what they come up with, then we can decide if it's good or bad. Adam Lambert has a better relationship with Brian and Roger than Paul Rodgers had, and the public have welcomed them with open arms, so you just don't know what could happen. It doesn't matter what they call the band on the record - most likely it will be Queen + Adam Lambert on the cover. I would imagine that with Adam Lambert on board rather than Paul Rodgers, it will be a very Queen sounding album. It would be a brave thing for Adam Lambert to do - it's one thing to tour with them because they don't have a singer, but it's quite another to make a complete record with them with original material. If the album flops it could be the end of Adam Lambert's career in the UK for a few years, so everyone knows that this time the stakes are higher than with PR. There were some decent songs on the Cosmos Rocks it's true, I mean, competent, that is. I thought Time to Shine could have been a good song if Freddie had sung it and John had played bass, for instance. All things that glitter can't be gold (or was it Once I Loved a Butterfly?) was a lovely song too, but then there was C-Lebrity, and that Call me if you need my love which frankly was torture to listen to (for me, anyway). In the same way I don't really like Las Palabras De Amor, but I prefer it to Call Me.... |
andyb1968 02.03.2015 13:09 |
Bookies have shortened the odds on a Queen+Adam Lambert Bond theme !!!! |
Ale Solan 02.03.2015 14:53 |
miraclesteinway wrote: Cosmos Rocks wasn't their finest hour, but neither was Hot Space. Give them a chance to see what they come up with, then we can decide if it's good or bad. Adam Lambert has a better relationship with Brian and Roger than Paul Rodgers had, and the public have welcomed them with open arms, so you just don't know what could happen. It doesn't matter what they call the band on the record - most likely it will be Queen + Adam Lambert on the cover. I would imagine that with Adam Lambert on board rather than Paul Rodgers, it will be a very Queen sounding album. It would be a brave thing for Adam Lambert to do - it's one thing to tour with them because they don't have a singer, but it's quite another to make a complete record with them with original material. If the album flops it could be the end of Adam Lambert's career in the UK for a few years, so everyone knows that this time the stakes are higher than with PR. There were some decent songs on the Cosmos Rocks it's true, I mean, competent, that is. I thought Time to Shine could have been a good song if Freddie had sung it and John had played bass, for instance. All things that glitter can't be gold (or was it Once I Loved a Butterfly?) was a lovely song too, but then there was C-Lebrity, and that Call me if you need my love which frankly was torture to listen to (for me, anyway). In the same way I don't really like Las Palabras De Amor, but I prefer it to Call Me....I admire your optimism about a new Queen + project but mind these facts: Freddie Mercury is dead. He was the main source of inspiration for Queen. Adam Lambert it's a Glee-type-of-artist, kinda Broadway-ish, definately not a rockstar. Freddie had an unique personality, person-wise and musical-wise. Brian & Rog seemed to have lost their inspiration and turned out quite repetitive in their solo work. Fun on Earth and Brian's project with Kerry Ellis 'Anthems' are clear examples. (You can also see their lack of inspiration on Cosmos Rocks as well) Cosmos Rocks was a complete failure, no matter how many tracks you like from it. |
miraclesteinway 02.03.2015 15:42 |
You're right Cosmos Rocks was a complete failure - all I was saying is that it did have some potential, in the tracks that I mentioned (IMHO), but that the potential was never met. Freddie was one source of inspiration for Queen, and his voice and what it could do was a huge influence on the way that the others wrote. There is no doubt he was a unique personality and had a unique personality, and there is no doubt that he was an absolute genius as a songwriter and arranger. The things his voice could do were unsurpassed in his day, and even today in the days of comprehensive vocal coaching there are few around who can really sing his music. Adam Lambert has worked in Glee (or is about to), that's absolutely correct. Glee is big business in the USA, and Adam Lambert has obviously been offered a lucrative deal. Is he a rock star? Well, that's open for debate. Whatever a rock star is these days, I don't know. 25 years ago it could be said that Freddie was the archetypal and ultimate rock star, and in fact he carved out most of that image himself. Because over the years there has been both a convergence of styles in the main stream, it's difficult to look at the music scene today and figure out who is the archetypal rock star in new bands. Personally I like The Killers, but I can't for an instant imagine Brandon Flowers in Queen - his voice is too 'nice', you know, too pure. What Adam Lambert is, though, is a great singer. He has great technique, phenomenal in fact, and has an unsurpassed range - at least in terms of the well known singers today, and he has a well-honed stage presence and he knows how to connect with an audience. I went to the Wembley show and thought that it was an excellent show, and I thought Adam handled the situation really well (hey, if you were in his shoes, you'd take the job of fronting Queen for a couple of years too!), and he really won the audience over. Whether or not you personally like the sound of Adam Lambert's voice is a different matter, and that's fine if you don't. All of this though is fairly academic, because we're talking about Adam Lambert making the transition from fronting a back-catalogue band to making an album of original material with that band. If the album does go ahead, and Adam is one of the songwriters on the record, it's going to be quite different from a Freddie-based Queen album. It could be a disaster - of course it could - but it might not. It really depends what happens. I know of course, that there is a difference between commercial success and a good album, and there is also the matter of whether or not an individual actually enjoys the album. I am optimistic about it because Brian and Roger are still excellent musicians, and Adam is a great singer (whether you feel he is right for Queen or not - again, that's a different matter to whether or not he can sing). The Kerry Ellis album was not really a rock album, it was Brian May producing musical theatre and other cover versions with Kerry Ellis - who is also an excellent singer. It was all very musical theatre, but that's exactly what it set out to be, so from that point of view it was a success. Brian has always been attracted to those kind of projects - look at 'Talking of Love' which is a very similar situation - it's just that in Brian's career at the time it was bookended with A Kind of Magic and The Miracle. Roger's Fun on Earth isn't my favourite album, in fact I haven't bought it yet (I might, it's taken me a long time to soften to Happiness?), and it sort of sounds like, well, it's quite tame and a little pedestrian, you're right. When I saw the show with Adam Lambert though, I saw something in the band that was reminiscent of the old Queen. It was nothing like what I've seen with Paul Rodgers. It was like they had a young Freddie back, but I mean that in Brian and Roger's reaction to what was going on rather than how Adam was, because Adam is very different from Freddie. I don't know, all I'm saying is, yes, some of the projects that Brian and Roger have been involved in recently have been substandard, but let's give it a chance and see what happens. If we don't like it, if it's substandard too, then fair enough. If I don't like it I'll come on here and say, yes you were right and my hopes are dashed. I'm willing to give it a try though, because I believe that they are still capable of producing excellent work. I treat every performance and song that I hear as a new fresh chance - that's something I've learned as a musician myself - sometimes we write off people as being not so capable and then they deliver something to you that is of unbelievable quality. Sometimes the reverse happens. Of course, if you don't actually like Adam Lambert then you certainly won't like a Queen + Adam Lambert LP. Also, I agree with your sentiment that it isn't Queen as we know it, it's not the version of Queen that we all wish could still happen - it can't be because you've got one writer dead and another one retired, and that's very important when considering the sound of a group. John was as important a part of Queen as Freddie was and I think nobody here has forgotten that. It's hard for Brian and Roger to stop playing though because firstly, they are musicians and the Queen brand is probably the best brand for them to use to get out to the public (cynical of me to call it a brand, but it is, we all know that), and secondly the public on the whole actually want Queen to go out and perform. Whether or not they want another record is, of course, quite a different matter but if they go ahead I wish them luck. After the Cosmos Rocks it does feel like something that fans will treat with trepidation, but then, for me, the band that produced A Night At The Opera went on to produce Jazz and Hot Space, but people still came back to them. The singer that wrote Bohemian Rhapsody also made the Mr Bad Guy album, but then after that he went on to make Barcelona and record the Innuendo album, which I think are two classics. Let's just wait and see. |
The King Of Rhye 02.03.2015 15:59 |
Ale Solan wrote: Cosmos Rocks was a complete failure, no matter how many tracks you like from it.Huh? If I like EVERY track on it, how is it a failure (to me at least!)??? Not that I do like every track on it, but I think that it gets a bum rap from a lot of people here...... My main problem with it was that it didnt have enough of a "Queen sound" to it.....and I would have liked there to be an actual band on the damn thing.........but there's some good stuff there, I think........ |
Ale Solan 02.03.2015 16:05 |
Lovely post, mate, I really enjoyed reading it, cheers!
but I singled out this part from your own words, read it again and you'll might have a final look on what I meant:
After the Cosmos Rocks it does feel like something that fans will treat with trepidation, but then, for me, the band that produced A Night At The Opera went on to produce Jazz and Hot Space, but people still came back to them. The singer that wrote Bohemian Rhapsody also made the Mr Bad Guy album, but then after that he went on to make Barcelona and record the Innuendo album, which I think are two classics. Let's just wait and see.You're right, the band with Freddie (and his solo career) had their ups and downs but, again, Queen had Freddie, and Freddie was alive -regarding his solo career- so the magic is gone. I wasn't excited back then in 2008 about seeing Queen + PR, just excited to see Brian & Rog live doin' barely what they do. Now I have the same feelin'. Maybe I'll go and see them when they play later this year in Buenos Aires. I'm not excited about AL and I know Brian & Rog are not in the best shape (Brian still kind of is but Rog is not almost 100% like in 2008) He needs help from his son to play. Almost deaf. Many etc's... but I wanna see 'em live for the last time, they won't tour again. Not a rumour or an opinion, a fact. |
Ale Solan 02.03.2015 16:11 |
The King Of Rhye wrote:I like 3 o 4 songs in it but the album is still a failure, musically/comercially-wise. Not your case maybe but if you liked the whole Cosmos Rocks album maybe you should re-define your musical taste. Or get your ears checked lol. Just kidding ;)Ale Solan wrote: Cosmos Rocks was a complete failure, no matter how many tracks you like from it.Huh? If I like EVERY track on it, how is it a failure (to me at least!)??? Not that I do like every track on it, but I think that it gets a bum rap from a lot of people here...... My main problem with it was that it didnt have enough of a "Queen sound" to it.....and I would have liked there to be an actual band on the damn thing.........but there's some good stuff there, I think........ |
master marathon runner 02.03.2015 17:50 |
Ale Solan, excuse me but...........do you have a metal plate in your head ? |
miraclesteinway 03.03.2015 11:23 |
I know that you feel that the magic of Queen was in Freddie Mercury. You know, you're right - the dynamic front man who could connect with an audience, and who had *that* voice, which is one of the most revered voices in all of popular music and not without good reason. I totally understand that Queen without Freddie is a difficult concept, and for you at least, and others on this forum, it's over. For John Deacon, Queen is over too. For Brian and Roger, they want to go on and make music, and I they clearly feel that using the Queen name is better, from a marketing point of view, than getting into say a Page and Plant type partnership. OK, let's be honest here, it IS a Page and Plant type relationship as two fundamentally important members of the band are missing. I wonder what we'd be saying if Freddie hadn't died, and the band had, say, split up in 1997, and then Freddie and John went on tour as Queen with Slash on guitar and a session drummer? It would be as odd a situation as we have now, for sure. But that's not the situation we're in. Brian and Roger clearly want to tour (I know, I keep repeating myself) and the public want them to tour as Queen. I wasn't all that excited by the Cosmos Rocks either. I don't really know any fans of Queen that are, and of course they didn't perform anything from it on this tour - it's clear that they'd rather forget about it. The record was a commercial flop, and largely that's because it was substandard in so many ways. It had some decent moments on it but it was largely, well, I understand some of the folk on this forum like it but most people don't. What I could see working, rather than an album with 'QUEEN + Adam Lambert' is an Adam Lambert record produced and perhaps co-written by Brian and Roger, without the Queen brand headlining the affair - in fact let Adam Lambert and his team guide it. But that's probably not what is going to happen. It will most likely be billed as a Queen album. What the Cosmos Rocks proved was that the Queen brand is strong when it comes to live performance, but not necessarily when it comes to a released product. People don't necessarily want to buy an album for repeated listening, and the quality of the record is still very important - especially given the segment of the market they are going for. Music fans in their 30s and above who are into Queen most probably do care about the quality of the music they're listening to, and if a record doesn't live up to it, then it won't sell very well. I still say, let's wait and see, but I know that for you, without Freddie, it's really not Queen anymore. I agree, the classic Queen is over, but Brian, Roger and Adam are three great musicians, and even if Roger can't play as well (actually he played pretty well at Wembley, yes he gave some over to his son, but Roger can still play), he could still have some excellent ideas about production and arrangement. No matter how many times I say it though, I know it's hard to conceive of this project without Freddie. Adam has his own magic, it lies in the theatrical and his voice is excellent. He isn't Freddie, and Freddie wasn't Adam. Adam is, in many ways, more theatrical than Freddie, and you're absolutely right - Adam Lambert was putting on a West End show in that concert if you like. Freddie was actually more subtle (subtle isn't a word I'd associate with Freddie normally), but for me it worked. |
MercurialFreddie 04.03.2015 04:19 |
Maybe they've already began working on prev. unreleased material (collab. with Orbit). I'd say that now is the time to act for Queen's PR. The tour was a success, the "Queen" brand drew attention, the general interest in Queen is greater than before so if they want to make more money they should announce a release. |
Costa86 04.03.2015 05:02 |
The Cosmos Rocks was frankly embarassing. That a band like Queen would put their name on it is disappointing. I've completely turned around when it comes to doing live shows - I enjoyed the Queen+Lambert show in London in January, and hope they keep up the touring mentality for a while longer. But when it comes to albums - I just don't see them being able to produce anything worthwhile. They're past their writing and creative prime, and that is obvious to all. It's pointless trying to come up with songs. Nobody will give a shit. At this point it's just a question of stroking themselves because they enjoy it - the only reason they have to make music is because they find it rewarding or whatever. I don't know if it would have been different if Freddie were alive. He was such a creative force that I just might be able to imagine him coming up with maybe one hit single in 2015. But even that's not a certainty. |
mike hunt 04.03.2015 09:09 |
Ale Solan wrote: Lovely post, mate, I really enjoyed reading it, cheers! but I singled out this part from your own words, read it again and you'll might have a final look on what I meant:After the Cosmos Rocks it does feel like something that fans will treat with trepidation, but then, for me, the band that produced A Night At The Opera went on to produce Jazz and Hot Space, but people still came back to them. The singer that wrote Bohemian Rhapsody also made the Mr Bad Guy album, but then after that he went on to make Barcelona and record the Innuendo album, which I think are two classics. Let's just wait and see.You're right, the band with Freddie (and his solo career) had their ups and downs but, again, Queen had Freddie, and Freddie was alive -regarding his solo career- so the magic is gone. I wasn't excited back then in 2008 about seeing Queen + PR, just excited to see Brian & Rog live doin' barely what they do. Now I have the same feelin'. Maybe I'll go and see them when they play later this year in Buenos Aires. I'm not excited about AL and I know Brian & Rog are not in the best shape (Brian still kind of is but Rog is not almost 100% like in 2008) He needs help from his son to play. Almost deaf. Many etc's... but I wanna see 'em live for the last time, they won't tour again. Not a rumour or an opinion, a fact. |
mike hunt 04.03.2015 09:14 |
I like Jazz, Ir's obviously not Opera or Races, but it's still a pretty good récord. |
miraclesteinway 04.03.2015 10:02 |
Well, I agree Jazz has some decent moments, Fat Bottomed Girls is a classic rocker, I'm not so fond of Bicycle Race but as a composition it's genius. Jealousy is a beautifully sung piano ballade, which is kind of innocent lyrically, and Dead on Time and Dreamers Ball are really good fun tracks too. Mustapha isn't exactly radio friendly but yet again it's a work of genius as well. It hasn't escaped me that the two works on the LP that I described as genius are both Freddie's. |
master marathon runner 04.03.2015 11:16 |
I've always thought of jazz as, as far as Queen's attitude is concerned, ahh sod all pomp and perfection, lets have a blast and rock it! |
Day dop 04.03.2015 11:20 |
I really hope Brian and Roger don't do an album with Lambert. It wouldn't be Queen, no more than Cosmos Rocks was, and it'd mean having to put up with Glamberts and more Lambert posts all over Queen pages.... which, what with not being a Lambert fan, personally, I'm quite sick of. Plus, I don't think Lambert is much of a writer going by his own material (did he even write it?), and Roger and Brian don't seem to have written an exceptionally good track for years, let alone an entire albums worth. |
Thistle 04.03.2015 17:39 |
Cosmos Rocks sounded like a Roger Taylor album....funny that! I only bothered with it because I respected Paul Rodgers as a singer and thought he did a good job with Queen. I didn't particularly like it as a whole, but there were a handful of tracks I really enjoyed....oddly, the experience I have with most Roger albums. I don't like Adam Lambert's music, and I only went to see the show in Glasgow as it may have been my last chance to see Brian and Roger. I didn't find Lambert an inspiring singer or showman, although he did a good job on tracks like Save Me and WWTLF. As such, I think I'd need to avoid a new album, as he'd likely have some influence on it. However, it wouldn't bother me if they tried. They're entitled to. |
mike hunt 04.03.2015 21:37 |
Jazz was a good album for Freddie as a writer, Mustapha is a personal favorite. |
AlexRocks 04.03.2015 22:32 |
Bullshit! "The Cosmos Rocks" is one Queen's best studio l.p.s!!! The drum sound on it is phenomenal! |
Ale Solan 04.03.2015 22:49 |
AlexRocks wrote: Bullshit! "The Cosmos Rocks" is one Queen's best studio l.p.s!!! The drum sound on it is phenomenal!link |
miraclesteinway 05.03.2015 02:43 |
different strokes for different folks...... certainly it was the best Queen album since 'Made In Heaven' |
Togg 05.03.2015 03:13 |
Cosmos Rocks has some interesting stuff on it, and I agree wholeheartedly that the drum sound is excellent, far better than any album they did with Mack or later. I too thunk of it as very much a Roger album, I think at the time Brian was going through one of his no productive periods and finding teh releationship with Paul difficult. As someone said with Freddie at the helm they recorded ANATO, but also Hot Space... he made the Bad Guy album without any outside influence from the band.... and frankly it's just about the worst album I can think of, the new re-takes from the band are 1000 times better than his versions. If they do a new ablum I will be very interested in hearing it, I think they still have something to offer in a studio, I love hearing Brian's guitar, so that alone will be wonderful to hear again. I hope they let Adam have some say becuase i think they need to move it a little towards his audience if they want it to sell, he has a big following now and a younger audience so it could be interesting. I like Queen because the evolve, not despite of it, so change is good in my book. |
miraclesteinway 05.03.2015 04:57 |
- actually it's not true that Freddie made the bad guy album without any influence from the band. There are Queen versions of some of the tracks floating around - There Must Be More To Life had the others on it, as did Man Made Paradise, and I'm not sure which others did. Brian has gone as far as to say that the session guitarist on Man Made Paradise actually copied Brian's playing exactly, track by track, and Brian felt hurt at that time that Freddie didn't just use the original track and credit him for it. Brian and Roger have said that Love Kills (I know, it wasn't on Bad Guy) was actually a fully-fledged Queen record credited to Freddie Mercury, with no acknowledgement that the others actually played on it, and Freddie had suggested to them - or allowed them to form the view that - their parts were scrubbed and replaced, but it didn't happen that way. The Mr Bad Guy era was a rather messy time within the Queen camp. Freddie was not being the easiest person to deal with at that time. In fact probably none of them were. |
Togg 05.03.2015 05:22 |
Yes I am aware of those tracks, but I'm refering to the versions that made it on the album, which frankly were awful, Freddie either disregarded what the band had to say or they recorded those versions after his were done. My point was that left alone Freddie was no genius who could magically create masterpeices at the stroke of a pen, he produced some of the weakest tracks Queen have done and his only fully (solo) album was a massive flop. Only when they all worked together did the magic really happen in my view, and then not always, Cosmos Rocks is head and shoulders above and one of the bands solo efforts again in my opinion. |
tomchristie22 05.03.2015 05:28 |
Freddie was being pretty douchey at the time it seems, probably out of desire to show he could make it on his own, not to hurt the others.
miraclesteinway wrote: Brian and Roger have said that Love Kills (I know, it wasn't on Bad Guy) was actually a fully-fledged Queen record credited to Freddie Mercury, with no acknowledgement that the others actually played on it, and Freddie had suggested to them - or allowed them to form the view that - their parts were scrubbed and replaced, but it didn't happen that way.Really though, the guitar solo at the end of Love Kills is unmistakably Brian, even with the unusual effect - surely he'd have been able to tell it was his own playing. |
miraclesteinway 05.03.2015 06:04 |
It seems that for whatever reason at the time, they didn't get into it - from what I can glean from the documentaries. I mean it's not as if any of them needed to worry about cash flow. Anyway it seems Brian and Roger have reclaimed that particular one.... |
AlexRocks 05.03.2015 10:46 |
Why were Brian and Paul having difficulties with their relationship? |
BETA215 05.03.2015 11:05 |
AlexRocks wrote: Why were Brian and Paul having difficulties with their relationship? I don't know from where you are, but relationship is something between girlfriend-girlfriend, girlfriend-boyfriend, or boyfriend-boyfriend, you know? Friendship is something between friend-friend. |
master marathon runner 05.03.2015 11:12 |
Freddie's solo album "a massive flop" - not on your Nelly ! No. 6 in the UK charts, ( higher than 'Barcelona'), spawning a hit single and plenty of air play/exposure. Although it was certainly no 'Thriller' , it was half decent hit. . I hear the negative consensus from time to time in documentaries etc, but those who can cast their minds back and have the power of recall,know it's not quite true, IT WAS NO FLOP. |
miraclesteinway 05.03.2015 11:54 |
Relationship can refer to romantic relationship, business relationship, or friendship. Any kind of situation where two people have to interact can be referred to as a relationship where I am from. Of course, if you say you're 'In a relationship with' someone, then that usually always refers to a romantic situation, or marriage (hey, marriage and life-partner situations are not always romantic situations..... sometimes far from it!) |
mike hunt 05.03.2015 15:30 |
Freddie is grossly underated as a songwriter, he gets his props as a singer and performer though. let's face it, Brian and Roger havn't lit the world on fire over the last 25 years without Freddie. All those classics they wrote over the last quarter of a century is impressive, lol. |
hobbit in Rhye 05.03.2015 15:49 |
mike hunt wrote: Freddie is grossly underated as a songwriter, he gets his props as a singer and performer though. let's face it, Brian and Roger havn't lit the world on fire over the last 25 years without Freddie. All those classics they wrote over the last quarter of a century is impressive, lol.I think you were a bit unfair to Brian and Roger there. Freddie didn't lit the world on fire with his solos either. Though he had less than 25 years of it, but no material in his solo vault points to a global flame. Within Queen, Brian and Roger's contribution to songwriting is anything as big as Freddie's. Freddie might have written more hits but then he got the credit for it. Let's say that the 4 of them work better in Queen combination than by themselves. |
Day dop 05.03.2015 16:08 |
mike hunt wrote: Freddie is grossly underated as a songwriter, he gets his props as a singer and performer though. let's face it, Brian and Roger havn't lit the world on fire over the last 25 years without Freddie. All those classics they wrote over the last quarter of a century is impressive, lol.I just finished watching the The Nation's Favourite 70s Number One, on ITV. It was fairly obvious which song was going to top it, which it did - just like pretty much every other Nations favourite song show (Bohemian Rhapsody of course). Even aside from the other superb material Freddie wrote, for that reason alone he'll never be considered an underrated songwriter. |
Day dop 05.03.2015 16:11 |
hobbit-in-Rhye wrote:Living On My Own eventually got to number one (albeit, a slight reworking of it). I Was Born To Love You is well known, especially in Japan. Then there's the Barcelona track, of course (alright, not strictly solo, but still...)mike hunt wrote: Freddie is grossly underated as a songwriter, he gets his props as a singer and performer though. let's face it, Brian and Roger havn't lit the world on fire over the last 25 years without Freddie. All those classics they wrote over the last quarter of a century is impressive, lol.I think you were a bit unfair to Brian and Roger there. Freddie didn't lit the world on fire with his solos either. Though he had less than 25 years of it, but no material in his solo vault points to a global flame. Within Queen, Brian and Roger's contribution to songwriting is anything as big as Freddie's. Freddie might have written more hits but then he got the credit for it. Let's say that the 4 of them work better in Queen combination than by themselves. I think that track alone was more successful and well known than anything Roger or Brian pulled out of the bag (in terms of solo material). The only shame is, that Freddie didn't have more time to do solo stuff. Generally, I agree with your last sentence, although there are exceptions to the rule, of course (a few solo numbers are better than some Queen tracks - although some of those eventually did become so on Made In Heaven). |
hobbit in Rhye 06.03.2015 18:16 |
^ While I like all the songs that you mentioned, I would hardly call them "lit the world on fire". Would you?
There are several interesting tracks in Brian's solo stuffs in the early years that is not any bit lesser than Freddie's, quality wise. They are just less well-known, for many reasons (one reason is that a guitarist's work wouldn't be easier to the mass' ear than a singer's work). It's always the die-young star to take all the glory with him and the ones who stay to look trivial.
Day dop wrote: a few solo numbers are better than some Queen tracksAre you really applying the "China horse race trick" here to me: pit the best of this person agains the mediocre of the other? Anybody can be better than Queen on their down day. If I have to compare, I would compare his solo's best to Queen's best, because those are the things that remain when time goes by. In that spirit, none of his solos (or Brian's, or Roger's) come a mile near Queen's summit. Queen just brings out the best in them. By the way, I mean the China horse trick as a joke, don't get offended ^^ |
k-m 07.03.2015 06:55 |
I'm glad someone pointed out that Freddie did not have much time to really pursue his solo career. Having said that, his ears clearly failed him in the early, mid eighties when he gave in to the cheesy mainstream sound and produced a batch of pretty lame songs to match it. Mr Bad Guy a moderate hit? Come on. It was obvious his first solo venture would chart fairly high in the first weeks of sales, just because of the hype of a debut FM solo album, but it was a steep decline afterwards. Born to Love You did not perform very well either. No. 11 for first single of one of the world's most prolific singers is really not an achievement. The success of LOMO in 1993 is a completely different story. Still, I do wonder how his career would develop, once he chucked all that 80s plastic. The Great Pretender single did very well and Barcelona was an intriguing and in my opinion an accomplished piece of work. What a shame. |
miraclesteinway 07.03.2015 09:12 |
The early to mid 80s were the years when Freddie was trying to cater to a specific market - he was trying to be current and mix it with his own blend of pop/rock sensibilities. It's absolutely true he came up with some good songs, and that he sang them beautifully, but nothing he did really fit in with the current trends of the time. Perhaps, in hindsight, he should have stuck to keeping Queen as Queen, but it's always easy to say things in hindsight. OK Bad Guy wasn't a TOTAL flop - no.6 is respectable, but it's only because he was who he was that it charted that high. Living on my own came charted in '93 because it really did sound current to the time because of the remix, and of course people wanted Freddie product in the aftermath of his death. I was born to love you did well as a Queen song in certain parts of the world, and had a respectable chart position here, but it's hardly rock megastar success. But then, neither Roger's nor Brian's solo careers ever did that well either. Brian had a larger scale tour than Roger did, in '92, and 'Driven By You' was a successful single due to the Ford advert. All of the musicians in Queen worked best as Queen between 73 and 91, and although there were some nice songs written between '91 and '98 in solo projects, it's true there has been very little that reflects the achievements of the band at their pinnacle. We'll see what happens with Q + AL - it might just have all the right ingredients for a good record, it might not! |
Day dop 07.03.2015 14:02 |
hobbit-in-Rhye wrote: ^ While I like all the songs that you mentioned, I would hardly call them "lit the world on fire". Would you? There are several interesting tracks in Brian's solo stuffs in the early years that is not any bit lesser than Freddie's, quality wise. They are just less well-known, for many reasons (one reason is that a guitarist's work wouldn't be easier to the mass' ear than a singer's work). It's always the die-young star to take all the glory with him and the ones who stay to look trivial.Day dop wrote: a few solo numbers are better than some Queen tracksAre you really applying the "China horse race trick" here to me: pit the best of this person agains the mediocre of the other? Anybody can be better than Queen on their down day. If I have to compare, I would compare his solo's best to Queen's best, because those are the things that remain when time goes by. In that spirit, none of his solos (or Brian's, or Roger's) come a mile near Queen's summit. Queen just brings out the best in them. By the way, I mean the China horse trick as a joke, don't get offended ^^ "Lit the world on fire" isn't a term I'd really apply to any individual Queen numbers, let alone their solo material. Perhaps Bohemian Rhapsody, or Another One Bites the Dust... maybe, they might be the closest fit to that term... in the loosest sense. The only thing I'd really apply that term to (music-wise) is Beatlemania. |
hobbit in Rhye 07.03.2015 18:21 |
Day dop wrote: "Lit the world on fire" isn't a term I'd really apply to any individual Queen numbers, let alone their solo material. Perhaps Bohemian Rhapsody, or Another One Bites the Dust... maybe, they might be the closest fit to that term... in the loosest sense. The only thing I'd really apply that term to (music-wise) is Beatlemania.Okay then, I was just replying to mike hunt who said that Brian and Roger didn't lit the world on fire to emphasis the "underratedness" of Freddie. I don't really see how the 2 things connect. |
mike hunt 07.03.2015 20:51 |
I'm a fan of all four members of Queen, but it's silly to call out Freddie for one solo album that was recorded between The Works and Magic, but not call out Roger and Brian for 25 years of forgettable music. Bacelona was a work of art, almost on par with Queens best IMO. |
Heavenite 08.03.2015 05:51 |
I agree! Barcelona is a pretty special album. The Fallen Priest, La Japponaise, How Can I Go On etc. Brian did some pretty special solo tracks in my opinion too like Resurrection, but it wasn't as consistent as Freddie's effort with Montserrat Caballe. Some Queen albums also don't reach the Barcelona standard in my opinion. |
Pingfah 09.03.2015 06:42 |
BETA215 wrote:He's probably from somewhere where English is used correctly then, as it is perfectly acceptable to refer to a friendship between 2 people as "their relationship".AlexRocks wrote: Why were Brian and Paul having difficulties with their relationship?I don't know from where you are, but relationship is something between girlfriend-girlfriend, girlfriend-boyfriend, or boyfriend-boyfriend, you know? Friendship is something between friend-friend. |
hobbit in Rhye 09.03.2015 15:45 |
mike hunt wrote: I'm a fan of all four members of Queen, but it's silly to call out Freddie for one solo album that was recorded between The Works and Magic, but not call out Roger and Brian for 25 years of forgettable music. Bacelona was a work of art, almost on par with Queens best IMO.I didn't call out Freddie, neither miraclesteinway nor k-m did. Good songs are good, and mediocre songs are mediocre. I already said that I liked several of his solo tracks. Now if you want to call out Brian and Roger for "forgettable music", fine, it's your taste. The thing I didn't agree in your old post is that you compare them to emphasis that Freddie is underrated as a songwriter. The two cases just can't be compared, for many reason. First, Barcelona is a nice album but it's hardly Freddie's solo. It is co-written by him, Mike Moran and other people. It became critical acclaimed because of the duo between him and Montserrat Caballe. I wouldn't say he lit the world on fire on his own (as you criticized that B & R didn't). Secondly, Brian had some decent solo stuffs back in the 90s too, and many people enjoyed them. I sure enjoy them as much as I enjoy Freddie's work. You may say it depends on personal preference, but quality wise it's not like Freddie's work are 3 times better than Brian's. Thirdly, while Brian was in his creative mood, on 1998 Cozy Powell, his drummer mate in Brian May's band, suddenly died of motocar accident. It disrupted his upcoming tour and was surely a heavy blow for Brian on emotional level and professional level. He'd just got out of the depression caused by Freddie's death and his father's, then came Cozy's. Imagine a soft fellow who was so broken in "All dead, all dead" just because of his pet cat, now what these 2 friends and colleagues' death would mean to him. It's a miracle that he picked up the guitar and played again after those events, we couldn't ask anymore from him. It's unfair to judge his songwriting ability post 1998. Fourthly, there's no evidence that if Freddie lives today he would fare better then B & R. All of them have given their best years to Queen, they have earned their rights to retire and do fluffy things. Freddie was a great songwriter and performer. No need to pitch him against B& R. I think Queen's strength lies in the balance between 4 members, any attempt to break that balance will not give a good result. Freddie himself had realized it since 1985. Now, I also have my favorite member of the band, but I don't think he is any higher than the rest 3 ;) |
mike hunt 09.03.2015 18:04 |
hobbit-in-Rhye wrote:mike hunt wrote: I'm a fan of all four members of Queen, but it's silly to call out Freddie for one solo album that was recorded between The Works and Magic, but not call out Roger and Brian for 25 years of forgettable music. Bacelona was a work of art, almost on par with Queens best IMO.I didn't call out Freddie, neither miraclesteinway nor k-m did. Good songs are good, and mediocre songs are mediocre. I already said that I liked several of his solo tracks. Now if you want to call our Brian and Roger for "forgettable music", fine, it's your taste. The thing I didn't agree in your old post is that you compare them to emphasis that Freddie is underrated as a songwriter. The two cases just can't be compared, for many reason. First, Barcelona is a nice album but it's hardly Freddie's solo. It is co-written by him, Mike Moran and other people. It became critical acclaimed because of the duo between him and Montserrat Caballe. I wouldn't say he lit the world on fire on his own (as you criticized that B & R didn't). Secondly, Brian had some decent solo stuffs back in the 90s too, and many people enjoyed them. I sure enjoy them as much as I enjoy Freddie's work. You may say it depends on personal preference, but quality wise it's not like Freddie's work are 3 times better than Brian's. Thirdly, while Brian was in his creative mood, on 1998 Cozy Powell, his drummer mate in Brian May's band, suddenly died of motocar accident. It disrupted his upcoming tour and was surely a heavy blow for Brian on emotional level and professional level. He'd just got out of the depression caused by Freddie's death and his father's, then came Cozy's. Imagine a soft fellow who was so broken in "All dead, all dead" just because of his pet cat, now what these 2 friends and colleagues' death would mean to him. It's a miracle that he picked up the guitar and played again after those events, we couldn't ask anymore from him. It's unfair to judge his songwriting ability post 1998. Fourthly, there's no evidence that if Freddie lives today he would fare better then B & R. All of them have given their best years to Queen, they have earned their rights to retire and do fluffy things. Freddie was a great songwriter and performer. No need to pitch him against B& R. I think Queen's strength lies in the balance between 4 members, any attempt to break that balance will not give a good result. Freddie himself had realized it since 1985. Now, I also have my favorite member of the band, but I don't think he is any higher than the rest 3 ;) |
mike hunt 09.03.2015 18:07 |
hobbit-in-Rhye wrote:mike hunt wrote: I'm a fan of all four members of Queen, but it's silly to call out Freddie for one solo album that was recorded between The Works and Magic, but not call out Roger and Brian for 25 years of forgettable music. Bacelona was a work of art, almost on par with Queens best IMO.I didn't call out Freddie, neither miraclesteinway nor k-m did. Good songs are good, and mediocre songs are mediocre. I already said that I liked several of his solo tracks. Now if you want to call our Brian and Roger for "forgettable music", fine, it's your taste. The thing I didn't agree in your old post is that you compare them to emphasis that Freddie is underrated as a songwriter. The two cases just can't be compared, for many reason. First, Barcelona is a nice album but it's hardly Freddie's solo. It is co-written by him, Mike Moran and other people. It became critical acclaimed because of the duo between him and Montserrat Caballe. I wouldn't say he lit the world on fire on his own (as you criticized that B & R didn't). Secondly, Brian had some decent solo stuffs back in the 90s too, and many people enjoyed them. I sure enjoy them as much as I enjoy Freddie's work. You may say it depends on personal preference, but quality wise it's not like Freddie's work are 3 times better than Brian's. Thirdly, while Brian was in his creative mood, on 1998 Cozy Powell, his drummer mate in Brian May's band, suddenly died of motocar accident. It disrupted his upcoming tour and was surely a heavy blow for Brian on emotional level and professional level. He'd just got out of the depression caused by Freddie's death and his father's, then came Cozy's. Imagine a soft fellow who was so broken in "All dead, all dead" just because of his pet cat, now what these 2 friends and colleagues' death would mean to him. It's a miracle that he picked up the guitar and played again after those events, we couldn't ask anymore from him. It's unfair to judge his songwriting ability post 1998. Fourthly, there's no evidence that if Freddie lives today he would fare better then B & R. All of them have given their best years to Queen, they have earned their rights to retire and do fluffy things. Freddie was a great songwriter and performer. No need to pitch him against B& R. I think Queen's strength lies in the balance between 4 members, any attempt to break that balance will not give a good result. Freddie himself had realized it since 1985. Now, I also have my favorite member of the band, but I don't think he is any higher than the rest 3 ;) |
mike hunt 09.03.2015 18:13 |
hobbit-in-Rhye wrote:mike hunt wrote: I'm a fan of all four members of Queen, but it's silly to call out Freddie for one solo album that was recorded between The Works and Magic, but not call out Roger and Brian for 25 years of forgettable music. Bacelona was a work of art, almost on par with Queens best IMO.I didn't call out Freddie, neither miraclesteinway nor k-m did. Good songs are good, and mediocre songs are mediocre. I already said that I liked several of his solo tracks. Now if you want to call our Brian and Roger for "forgettable music", fine, it's your taste. The thing I didn't agree in your old post is that you compare them to emphasis that Freddie is underrated as a songwriter. The two cases just can't be compared, for many reason. First, Barcelona is a nice album but it's hardly Freddie's solo. It is co-written by him, Mike Moran and other people. It became critical acclaimed because of the duo between him and Montserrat Caballe. I wouldn't say he lit the world on fire on his own (as you criticized that B & R didn't). Secondly, Brian had some decent solo stuffs back in the 90s too, and many people enjoyed them. I sure enjoy them as much as I enjoy Freddie's work. You may say it depends on personal preference, but quality wise it's not like Freddie's work are 3 times better than Brian's. Thirdly, while Brian was in his creative mood, on 1998 Cozy Powell, his drummer mate in Brian May's band, suddenly died of motocar accident. It disrupted his upcoming tour and was surely a heavy blow for Brian on emotional level and professional level. He'd just got out of the depression caused by Freddie's death and his father's, then came Cozy's. Imagine a soft fellow who was so broken in "All dead, all dead" just because of his pet cat, now what these 2 friends and colleagues' death would mean to him. It's a miracle that he picked up the guitar and played again after those events, we couldn't ask anymore from him. It's unfair to judge his songwriting ability post 1998. Fourthly, there's no evidence that if Freddie lives today he would fare better then B & R. All of them have given their best years to Queen, they have earned their rights to retire and do fluffy things. Freddie was a great songwriter and performer. No need to pitch him against B& R. I think Queen's strength lies in the balance between 4 members, any attempt to break that balance will not give a good result. Freddie himself had realized it since 1985. Now, I also have my favorite member of the band, but I don't think he is any higher than the rest 3 ;) |
mike hunt 09.03.2015 18:16 |
hobbit-in-Rhye wrote:mike hunt wrote: I'm a fan of all four members of Queen, but it's silly to call out Freddie for one solo album that was recorded between The Works and Magic, but not call out Roger and Brian for 25 years of forgettable music. Bacelona was a work of art, almost on par with Queens best IMO.I didn't call out Freddie, neither miraclesteinway nor k-m did. Good songs are good, and mediocre songs are mediocre. I already said that I liked several of his solo tracks. Now if you want to call our Brian and Roger for "forgettable music", fine, it's your taste. The thing I didn't agree in your old post is that you compare them to emphasis that Freddie is underrated as a songwriter. The two cases just can't be compared, for many reason. First, Barcelona is a nice album but it's hardly Freddie's solo. It is co-written by him, Mike Moran and other people. It became critical acclaimed because of the duo between him and Montserrat Caballe. I wouldn't say he lit the world on fire on his own (as you criticized that B & R didn't). Secondly, Brian had some decent solo stuffs back in the 90s too, and many people enjoyed them. I sure enjoy them as much as I enjoy Freddie's work. You may say it depends on personal preference, but quality wise it's not like Freddie's work are 3 times better than Brian's. Thirdly, while Brian was in his creative mood, on 1998 Cozy Powell, his drummer mate in Brian May's band, suddenly died of motocar accident. It disrupted his upcoming tour and was surely a heavy blow for Brian on emotional level and professional level. He'd just got out of the depression caused by Freddie's death and his father's, then came Cozy's. Imagine a soft fellow who was so broken in "All dead, all dead" just because of his pet cat, now what these 2 friends and colleagues' death would mean to him. It's a miracle that he picked up the guitar and played again after those events, we couldn't ask anymore from him. It's unfair to judge his songwriting ability post 1998. Fourthly, there's no evidence that if Freddie lives today he would fare better then B & R. All of them have given their best years to Queen, they have earned their rights to retire and do fluffy things. Freddie was a great songwriter and performer. No need to pitch him against B& R. I think Queen's strength lies in the balance between 4 members, any attempt to break that balance will not give a good result. Freddie himself had realized it since 1985. Now, I also have my favorite member of the band, but I don't think he is any higher than the rest 3 ;) |
mike hunt 09.03.2015 18:54 |
Sorry for the triple post, I never said Freddie solo was better than Brian. I'm saying it's not right using Freddie's Mr. Bad guy as proof of him not being a genius. I personally Think freddie and Brian were the Genius of Queen. Roger and John were also great of course. As far as Brian going through a rough patch in life. who hasn't? just because he's famous doesnt mean his problems are worse than ours. He had a good life. |
hobbit in Rhye 09.03.2015 19:20 |
Quadruple post, dude ^^ You scared me for a moment there. I never said Freddie is not a genius either. Problem solved. Nor did I say Brian's life is worse than ours. I was mentioning his Professional life. Have you ever seen any musician whose close band mate (for >20 years) died young, moving on, then another band mate died young, then still playing? Yeah Paul keeps playing after John is dead... oh wait, I forget that they are not friends. |