QueenZone discussion #1417246

Barry Durex wrote: ^ 5th November City Hall

brians wig wrote: Would REALLY like to know where you got it from "Just For you" - who suspiciously just happens to be a newbie.....

Nitroboy wrote: I managed to grab the whole thing, but out of respect for Brians Wig, I won't be sharing it.

BETA215 wrote: Oh, shit. I lost THE OPPORTUNITY I had to manage to have something to start trading. X(

Oscar J wrote: I got it too....

brians wig wrote: Well I think it's fair to say that some fucker has broken a promise not to trade this one. It's mine and I've been trying to get it pressed to bootleg vinyl and CD for a few months rather than release it here first and then see all the german/japanese bootleggers get their shitty little hands on it and make a fuck load of money out of something that isn't theirs. I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well. That's blown now and money wasted. Was it David Fuller again? The biggest irony is that when I spoke to Brian May a few weeks ago, he said they didn't have this one and I was taking a copy with me tonight to Leeds to pass over to Phil. Seems I don't need to bother now. Pittrek should take credit for cleaning up the recording and correcting the speed. Please don't give him shit for keeping his promise and not trading it or talking about it. At least someone out there is trustworthy.

Barry Durex wrote:

BETA215 wrote: Oh, shit. I lost THE OPPORTUNITY I had to manage to have something to start trading. X(

The perils of trading in all it's glory!

brians wig wrote: The biggest irony is that when I spoke to Brian May a few weeks ago, he said they didn't have this one and I was taking a copy with me tonight to Leeds to pass over to Phil. Seems I don't need to bother now.

Just For You wrote: I won't name my source so as not to cause any further bad feeling, however this was in no way an attempt to break trust or "troll" (as some other person has suggested"). I will not be back. I had many, many great things to share, but am worried about an unwelcome impact now.

The Real Wizard wrote: If you say you have more things, then check with your sources to make sure that they're OK to be shared. If you didn't know that this Sheffield recording was a no fly zone, then how can you be sure that all of these other supposed things you possess have the same no-share status?

Oscar J wrote: To make it even worse Greg, Freddie hits A4's in both the choruses of Flick Of The Wrist.

Oscar J wrote: To make it even worse Greg, Freddie hits A4's in both the choruses of Flick Of The Wrist.

Oscar J wrote: You're right, it's not very clever, he should be saving his voice for Rainbow. :-)

inu-liger wrote: What show was this? Or is this going to become yet another carrot dangling exercise?

brians wig wrote: It's mine and I've been trying to get it pressed to bootleg vinyl and CD for a few months... I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well. That's blown now and money wasted.

Gregsynth wrote:

Oscar J wrote: To make it even worse Greg, Freddie hits A4's in both the choruses of Flick Of The Wrist.

Taunting me isn't helping!!!!! XD

inu-liger wrote: What show was this? Or is this going to become yet another carrot dangling exercise?

Barry Durex wrote: No fly zone, WTF? Check with your sources, WTF? No share status, WTF? Honestly, what do YOU sound like?

Barry Durex wrote:

brians wig wrote: It's mine and I've been trying to get it pressed to bootleg vinyl and CD for a few months... I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well. That's blown now and money wasted.

Not sure if this sounds very moral even if it is legal in your part of the world. I'm sorry if I don't sound very sympathetic.

Barry Durex wrote:

brians wig wrote: It's mine and I've been trying to get it pressed to bootleg vinyl and CD for a few months... I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well. That's blown now and money wasted.

Not sure if this sounds very moral even if it is legal in your part of the world. I'm sorry if I don't sound very sympathetic.

The Real Wizard wrote: If you didn't know that this Sheffield recording was a no fly zone, then how can you be sure that all of these other supposed things you possess have the same no-share status?

brians wig wrote: Just For You. THANK YOU for your consideration in this matter and also to everyone else who has promised not to upload it yet. It WILL appear soon. The plan was for the 5th of November last year, but I couldn't get a vinyl company to commit to a low print run and I'd decided to give it until 5th November this year to try and sort something out before sharing it, but obviously plans have now changed. Please allow me a little while to rescue some use from this recording before I upload it myself.

BETA215 wrote:

brians wig wrote: Just For You. THANK YOU for your consideration in this matter and also to everyone else who has promised not to upload it yet. It WILL appear soon. The plan was for the 5th of November last year, but I couldn't get a vinyl company to commit to a low print run and I'd decided to give it until 5th November this year to try and sort something out before sharing it, but obviously plans have now changed. Please allow me a little while to rescue some use from this recording before I upload it myself.

Keep calm. An internet friend of mine (who isn't an active QueenZone user in the comments, but he/she download things), shared me the first songs: Procession, NIHere, FatherTS, OBattle and WhiteQ. He said me that he/she's going to give me the rest after something happens (for his/her privacy, I don't put it here). I'm not going to share it. Not because I will trade it or because I'm a hoarder. Because I know that this is something of value for this user, and it later will be shared. I only write this to show my grattitude about what you do.

Mercuryman12 wrote: What exactly happened?

brians wig wrote: Well I think it's fair to say that some fucker has broken a promise not to trade this one. It's mine and I've been trying to get it pressed to bootleg vinyl and CD for a few months rather than release it here first and then see all the german/japanese bootleggers get their shitty little hands on it and make a fuck load of money out of something that isn't theirs. I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well. That's blown now and money wasted.

Gregsynth wrote:

Oscar J wrote: To make it even worse Greg, Freddie hits A4's in both the choruses of Flick Of The Wrist.

Taunting me isn't helping!!!!! XD

inu-liger wrote:

Gregsynth wrote:

Oscar J wrote: To make it even worse Greg, Freddie hits A4's in both the choruses of Flick Of The Wrist.

Taunting me isn't helping!!!!! XD

Yeah I'm calling some bluffs here ;)

Thistleboy1980 wrote: I look forward to BW's bootleg version - hopefully it's not too expensive :) I think calling OP a wanker is a bit harsh if they didn't know. My version of Glasgow '73 was not in wide circulation and BOOM - it was here. What can you do? As I said to BETA in another thread, most things do, eventually - and all the credit goes to the sharer as they have no idea who the original source was. The peril's of trading. Someone will always break the chain. Hopefully we see it in all it's glory soon, from the correct source.

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

If you read the owner of the tape's explanation and proceed not to use binary thinking - then perhaps yes.

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

If you read the owner of the tape's explanation and proceed not to use binary thinking - then perhaps yes.

Oh I see. It's all clear now lol! Incidentally, is he the owner of the content of the tape? Does he own the copyright? Is he licensed to sell it by Queen productions?

brians wig wrote:

Barry Durex wrote:

brians wig wrote: It's mine and I've been trying to get it pressed to bootleg vinyl and CD for a few months... I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well. That's blown now and money wasted.

Not sure if this sounds very moral even if it is legal in your part of the world. I'm sorry if I don't sound very sympathetic.

Well, the bootleg companies are going to make a shit load of money out of this and I'm sorry, but I don't see why they should benefit and I don't. I was hoping to try and beat the bootleggers a bit first and, like I said, I'd been in touch with MCP, told them the situation and they said I could buy a licence which would allow me to have copies made. Being a vinyl freak, I wanted to do 50 vinyls, but that's proving difficult to do in the UK.

brians wig wrote: I've even paid for a licence with MCP to do it as well.

people on streets wrote: Isn't Queen productions owner of the played music? Even if they didn't own or make the recording, aren't they the legal owner of the musical performance?

The Real Wizard wrote: So if anyone is going to vilify someone for pressing LPs like this so that bootleggers can't make a quick buck off them, then they might as well be going after every 14 year old who uploads an iPhone video of the Jonas Brothers to YouTube that they filmed last night, because that is ultimately no different. Otherwise we wouldn't want them to sound hypocritical or anything...

The Real Wizard wrote:

people on streets wrote: Isn't Queen productions owner of the played music? Even if they didn't own or make the recording, aren't they the legal owner of the musical performance?

Short answer - no. Licensing and publishing issues remain, however, as QP own the songs themselves. But there is no special monopoly on that particular recording of them unless they own the master copy themselves. So as long as the LPs are distributed for free (or perhaps even just the cost of production), there should be no real legal issues. So if anyone is going to vilify someone for pressing LPs like this so that bootleggers can't make a quick buck off them, then they might as well be going after every 14 year old who uploads an iPhone video of the Jonas Brothers to YouTube that they filmed last night, because that is ultimately no different. Otherwise we wouldn't want them to sound hypocritical or anything...

The Real Wizard wrote:

people on streets wrote: Isn't Queen productions owner of the played music? Even if they didn't own or make the recording, aren't they the legal owner of the musical performance?

Short answer - no. Licensing and publishing issues remain, however, as QP own the songs themselves. But there is no special monopoly on that particular recording of them unless they own the master copy themselves. So as long as the LPs are distributed for free (or perhaps even just the cost of production), there should be no real legal issues. So if anyone is going to vilify someone for pressing LPs like this so that bootleggers can't make a quick buck off them, then they might as well be going after every 14 year old who uploads an iPhone video of the Jonas Brothers to YouTube that they filmed last night, because that is ultimately no different. Otherwise we wouldn't want them to sound hypocritical or anything...

Ghostwithasmile is BACK! wrote: These things are very well written down at a Swiss legal company.

Ghostwithasmile is BACK! wrote: Remember them re-selling the bootlegs at the top100 bootleg project? Those were direct rips of those bootlegs

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

If you read the owner of the tape's explanation and proceed not to use binary thinking - then perhaps yes.

Oh I see. It's all clear now lol! Incidentally, is he the owner of the content of the tape? Does he own the copyright? Is he licensed to sell it by Queen productions?

Considering he said he's giving a copy of the tape to Brian, maybe you should ask to clarify such details before making yourself look like a fool.

Ghostwithasmile is BACK! wrote:Remember them re-selling the bootlegs at the top100 bootleg project? Those were direct rips of those bootlegs

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

If you read the owner of the tape's explanation and proceed not to use binary thinking - then perhaps yes.

Oh I see. It's all clear now lol! Incidentally, is he the owner of the content of the tape? Does he own the copyright? Is he licensed to sell it by Queen productions?

Considering he said he's giving a copy of the tape to Brian, maybe you should ask to clarify such details before making yourself look like a fool.

Wow it doesn't take much for you to start firing the insults off. So what did I do to deserve your wrath this time your lordship?

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

If you read the owner of the tape's explanation and proceed not to use binary thinking - then perhaps yes.

Oh I see. It's all clear now lol! Incidentally, is he the owner of the content of the tape? Does he own the copyright? Is he licensed to sell it by Queen productions?

Considering he said he's giving a copy of the tape to Brian, maybe you should ask to clarify such details before making yourself look like a fool.

Wow it doesn't take much for you to start firing the insults off. So what did I do to deserve your wrath this time your lordship?

Panchgani wrote: BW's "wait 'til next year" after I bootleg 50 LPs" is a smoke screen. He will not share Sheffield. Full stop.

tcc wrote: Sorry double post. When I press post message, the screen shows page not found. So I press back arrow to get back to the post reply page and press post message again. Result : double post.

BETA215 wrote: Freddie hits G3 in Killer Queen (CARRY ON cigarettes), and he hits A#3 (slightly cracking) in RECOMMENDED at the price, finishing with a weird wanna try, but ending in the studio note. And also Roger hits D#4 in the beggining (I WANT YOOOu) And yes, there's a bass solo, provided by Mr. Wizard (weird, no? Giving that he's a guitar man).

Chief Mouse wrote: Seems like quite a few people got this. I'll be patient and wait for mr Brians Wig to officially post this some day.

Panchgani wrote: He will not share Sheffield. Full stop. That is the Fanthology mode of operation: Promise to share, but never deliver.

moonie wrote:

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

Holly2003 wrote: So .... selling bootlegs is fine now?

If you read the owner of the tape's explanation and proceed not to use binary thinking - then perhaps yes.

Oh I see. It's all clear now lol! Incidentally, is he the owner of the content of the tape? Does he own the copyright? Is he licensed to sell it by Queen productions?

Considering he said he's giving a copy of the tape to Brian, maybe you should ask to clarify such details before making yourself look like a fool.

Wow it doesn't take much for you to start firing the insults off. So what did I do to deserve your wrath this time your lordship?

Yes, that did seem a little snappy didn't it? Come on Bob.. Your one of the good guys here.. Holly made a valid point.

BETA215 wrote: ^ If we're talking about the same concert and song, it's quite out of tune. Maybe you're talking about the "Revisited..." version?

Chief Mouse wrote: Seems like quite a few people got this. I'll be patient and wait for mr Brians Wig to officially post this some day.

brians wig wrote: Oh, and I didn't say "wait until next year". I said my plan was to release it LAST year on the 40th Anniversary, but it all went tits up (and would have been overshadowed by Rainbow 74 anyway), so I WAS going to share it THIS November instead.  Obviously those plans will have to be brought forwards now, but we're talking weeks not months. ... So is it fair to estimate that LP's and CD's will be pressed by April, and available for download by ordinary fans by June?  ... Or that you will provide an update if circumstances change?

The Real Wizard wrote:

Sigh. These things have been explained countless times, and obviously cannot be comprehended by your double digit IQ. 

You, on the other hand, have contributed nothing. Zero. Nada. Just complaining and trolling those who do. It's easier to sit on your soapbox and spew your ignorance and straw man arguments towards those who do, which is why you'll continue to do just that. ... /queenzone/1056817.html I have not shared anything since 2007 when I shared Chicago '82 low Gen in Flac (for the first time on QZ).   ... and in mp3.  The mp3 share and half of the flac "mysteriously disappeared" from Megaupload shortly after I uploaded them (due to multiple copyright complaints). Before that I was the first to share Houston 77 (audio only) on QZ, and I conducted a bootleg tree before that. I have not downloaded and transferred to CDR anything since Boston 76 and Sun City 84 were first shared in 2009.  So you should have no worrys about me leeching from QZ.  

Panchgani wrote: I shared Chicago '82 low Gen in Flac (for the first time on QZ).

Before that I was the first to share Houston 77 (audio only) on QZ

Barry Durex wrote: Ok, next no fly zone (check with your sources) no share status release should be:- Hyde Park '76 cinefilm & Inglewood '77 Master Wait for it........

The Real Wizard wrote:

Panchgani wrote: I shared Chicago '82 low Gen in Flac (for the first time on QZ).

But you didn't unearth the tape. It was posted on Dimeadozen long before it was here. Creating a torrent of something that's already made the rounds doesn't hold a candle to actually searching for and locating old tapes and digitizing them with care.

Before that I was the first to share Houston 77 (audio only) on QZ

After someone else uploaded the DVD and you (or someone) did a rip. Therefore these weren't contributions of anything new - you were passing along things that were already circulating. You don't know who is responsible for getting those tapes out originally, because you've never bothered to take the time to figure out how these things work. But some of us do - they were found by the very people you continue to demonize in threads like this. Are you getting the point yet?

The Real Wizard wrote:

Panchgani wrote: I shared Chicago '82 low Gen in Flac (for the first time on QZ).

But you didn't unearth the tape. It was posted on Dimeadozen long before it was here. Creating a torrent of something that's already made the rounds doesn't hold a candle to actually searching for and locating old tapes and digitizing them with care.

Before that I was the first to share Houston 77 (audio only) on QZ

After someone else uploaded the DVD and you (or someone) did a rip. Therefore these weren't contributions of anything new - you were passing along things that were already circulating. You don't know who is responsible for getting those tapes out originally, because you've never bothered to take the time to figure out how these things work. But some of us do - they were found by the very people you continue to demonize in threads like this. Are you getting the point yet?

The Real Wizard wrote:

Panchgani wrote: I shared Chicago '82 low Gen in Flac (for the first time on QZ).

But you didn't unearth the tape. It was posted on Dimeadozen long before it was here. Creating a torrent of something that's already made the rounds doesn't hold a candle to actually searching for and locating old tapes and digitizing them with care.

Before that I was the first to share Houston 77 (audio only) on QZ

After someone else uploaded the DVD and you (or someone) did a rip. Therefore these weren't contributions of anything new - you were passing along things that were already circulating. You don't know who is responsible for getting those tapes out originally, because you've never bothered to take the time to figure out how these things work. But some of us do - they were found by the very people you continue to demonize in threads like this. Are you getting the point yet?

tomchristie22 wrote: Perhaps he wrote something abrasive and then removed it. This has actually gotten fairly interesting - I didn't realise things like Houston 77 which are freely available now were so hard to come by at a time which seems not that long ago (though 2007 really is a long time ago now).

dysan wrote: What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises? Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.

dysan wrote: What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises? Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.

people on streets wrote:

dysan wrote: What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises? Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.

google cache is your friend...

BETA215 wrote:

people on streets wrote:

dysan wrote: What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises? Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.

google cache is your friend...

Google Cache shows the same content. You lost this: link. An audio recording of that concert, I think.

Ozz wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

people on streets wrote:

dysan wrote: What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises? Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.

google cache is your friend...

Google Cache shows the same content. You lost this: http://www.queenlive.ca/queen/74-11-05.htm. An audio recording of that concert, I think.

You have to google the exact url ( wink ;) ) . is out there

The Real Wizard wrote:

Just For You wrote: I won't name my source so as not to cause any further bad feeling, however this was in no way an attempt to break trust or "troll" (as some other person has suggested"). I will not be back. I had many, many great things to share, but am worried about an unwelcome impact now.

1) Sure, don't name names here, but you absolutely should tell Brian's Wig who your source is. The original tape is his, and he deserves to know who betrayed his trust. The chain can be traced, and you can help if you choose to. 2) No need to cut and run. If you say you have more things, then check with your sources to make sure that they're OK to be shared. If you didn't know that this Sheffield recording was a no fly zone, then how can you be sure that all of these other supposed things you possess have the same no-share status?

musicland munich wrote: Meanwhile nobody should share this one.

brians wig wrote: Like I said, give it a few weeks or so folks and it will be reposted. I just want to get some pressed Cds/vinyls made of it and sold at cost price to bootleg collectors I know BEFORE the real bootlegging firms get hold of it and make a killing out of it themselves.

tomchristie22 wrote: Indeed, the cached version of the first page doesn't go back quite far enough to have the download link.

people on streets wrote:

tomchristie22 wrote: Indeed, the cached version of the first page doesn't go back quite far enough to have the download link.

people on streets wrote:

tomchristie22 wrote: Indeed, the cached version of the first page doesn't go back quite far enough to have the download link.

link

brians wig wrote:

people on streets wrote:

tomchristie22 wrote: Indeed, the cached version of the first page doesn't go back quite far enough to have the download link.

For fucks sake. Everyone else has requested my wishes to keep this private for the time being for reasons stated here a few times, yet you don't seem to give a shit. PLEASE remove this link!

BETA215 wrote:

brians wig wrote: Like I said, give it a few weeks or so folks and it will be reposted. I just want to get some pressed Cds/vinyls made of it and sold at cost price to bootleg collectors I know BEFORE the real bootlegging firms get hold of it and make a killing out of it themselves.

Can I ask you something? Aside the recording of this concert, why do you want to press a digital recording in a vinyl? I know the vinyl has his sound and all of that, but his sound starts from a analogic recording. I can't see the logic there. It's like the Rainbow vinyl, which is sourced from a digital source.

brians wig wrote:

people on streets wrote:

tomchristie22 wrote: Indeed, the cached version of the first page doesn't go back quite far enough to have the download link.

link

For fucks sake. Everyone else has requested my wishes to keep this private for the time being for reasons stated here a few times, yet you don't seem to give a shit. PLEASE remove this link!

Mercuryman12 wrote: Too late got the link and will be downloading later! I may share it!

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: Too late got the link and will be downloading later! I may share it!

Why Mercuryman12? Why? Don't share it, PLEASE. brians wig will share it later. Why you are so excited about it?! It's the same as Rainbow but in a different place. The same setlist. The same band. The same clichés. Why?

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: Too late got the link and will be downloading later! I may share it!

Why Mercuryman12? Why? Don't share it, PLEASE. brians wig will share it later. Why you are so excited about it?! It's the same as Rainbow but in a different place. The same setlist. The same band. The same clichés. Why?

To make a point that bootlegs are meant to be shared free. Buying a shitty vinyl transfer is not worth it

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: Too late got the link and will be downloading later! I may share it!

Why Mercuryman12? Why? Don't share it, PLEASE. brians wig will share it later. Why you are so excited about it?! It's the same as Rainbow but in a different place. The same setlist. The same band. The same clichés. Why?

To make a point that bootlegs are meant to be shared free. Buying a shitty vinyl transfer is not worth it

That isn't going to be a bootleg! He is going to press some vinyls for him and his friends, and then share the concert here! It's so difficult to understand it?!

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: Too late got the link and will be downloading later! I may share it!

Why Mercuryman12? Why? Don't share it, PLEASE. brians wig will share it later. Why you are so excited about it?! It's the same as Rainbow but in a different place. The same setlist. The same band. The same clichés. Why?

To make a point that bootlegs are meant to be shared free. Buying a shitty vinyl transfer is not worth it

That isn't going to be a bootleg! He is going to press some vinyls for him and his friends, and then share the concert here! It's so difficult to understand it?!

Still he may have given it to QP who may go out to try to snatch the bootleg up

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: Too late got the link and will be downloading later! I may share it!

Why Mercuryman12? Why? Don't share it, PLEASE. brians wig will share it later. Why you are so excited about it?! It's the same as Rainbow but in a different place. The same setlist. The same band. The same clichés. Why?

To make a point that bootlegs are meant to be shared free. Buying a shitty vinyl transfer is not worth it

That isn't going to be a bootleg! He is going to press some vinyls for him and his friends, and then share the concert here! It's so difficult to understand it?!

Still he may have given it to QP who may go out to try to snatch the bootleg up

And what's the problem? If he wants to make money out of HIS recording, what's the problem? It's something illegal? NO. (cause it isn't a bootleg!)

brians wig wrote: Mercuryman12 Read the entire thread and you'll see why i don't want it leaked yet. Unless of course, you are happy for the big bootleg firms like Wardour and Tarantura to make their own copies (as they ALWAYS do) and sell them to those people who like to have pressed CDs and vinyls as opposed to CD-R copies. This will inevitably happen, but I want to have some pressed myself (and I'm not talking hundreds or thousands) so that as many of those collectors as possible can have a copy at cost price instead of paying the extortionate rip-off prices charged by the bootleg companies. Did you know a Wardour CD set tends to sell for about £60? £60! Chuff me. WHY should anyone make a shit load of money from bootlegs, especially when they've just ripped off the recording form a website like this? DO YOU UNDERSTAND why I'm trying to keep this under the radar for the moment????? Even the person who posted it understands that and they removed the link! YOU might not be interested in vinyls or pressed discs, but other people are. As for QP snatching bootlegs. They've never done it yet. Are you somehow worried that if bootlegs hit the market first and get 'snatched' by QP, this recording will never surface?

brians wig wrote: You still don't get it do you? You've just put the recording firmly in the hands of the big bootlegging firms who will now make shit loads of money out of people who otherwise could have got a pressed CD or vinyl a lot cheaper. Wow. How selfish are you? There's an old saying: "Don't bite the hand that feeds" and I've helped feed this community since it started, what, nearly 15 years ago now is it, and lots of people here are aware of that and appreciate it as you will see if you read this whole thread. By flaunting complete disregard for a fellow members' request to hold off for just a few weeks, I can see a lot of other people who have also fed this community will now be keeping their recordings/rarities to themselves. How's that for a result then?

brians wig wrote:

people on streets wrote:

tomchristie22 wrote: Indeed, the cached version of the first page doesn't go back quite far enough to have the download link.

link

For fucks sake. Everyone else has requested my wishes to keep this private for the time being for reasons stated here a few times, yet you don't seem to give a shit. PLEASE remove this link!

Nitroboy wrote: Mercuryman - You're an asshole.

Gregsynth wrote: I think he's honestly screwing around Inuliger - he posted the blank Mediafire URL on another thread to have some fun.

Mercuryman12 wrote:

Gregsynth wrote: I think he's honestly screwing around Inuliger - he posted the blank Mediafire URL on another thread to have some fun.

I was! It was a joke but the sentiment I made about bootlegs being free was true. Inu-liger get a sense of humor

inu-liger wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

Gregsynth wrote: I think he's honestly screwing around Inuliger - he posted the blank Mediafire URL on another thread to have some fun.

I was! It was a joke but the sentiment I made about bootlegs being free was true. Inu-liger get a sense of humor

Ever since the huge bullshit with Dave R Fuller and the way he irreparably threw the Fanthology project under the bus, I have no humour when it comes to stunts like this (*with the exception of obvious April Fool's Day pranks) You're a dickhead. Plain and simple.

Mercuryman12 wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

Gregsynth wrote: I think he's honestly screwing around Inuliger - he posted the blank Mediafire URL on another thread to have some fun.

I was! It was a joke but the sentiment I made about bootlegs being free was true. Inu-liger get a sense of humor

Ever since the huge bullshit with Dave R Fuller and the way he irreparably threw the Fanthology project under the bus, I have no humour when it comes to stunts like this (*with the exception of obvious April Fool's Day pranks) You're a dickhead. Plain and simple.

Thank you for at least being honest in your opinion

brians wig wrote: You still don't get it do you? You've just put the recording firmly in the hands of the big bootlegging firms who will now make shit loads of money out of people who otherwise could have got a pressed CD or vinyl a lot cheaper. Wow. How selfish are you? There's an old saying: "Don't bite the hand that feeds" and I've helped feed this community since it started, what, nearly 15 years ago now is it, and lots of people here are aware of that and appreciate it as you will see if you read this whole thread. By flaunting complete disregard for a fellow members' request to hold off for just a few weeks, I can see a lot of other people who have also fed this community will now be keeping their recordings/rarities to themselves. How's that for a result then?

BETA215 wrote: Reported to YourValentine. I never thought that I had to do that, but like you said: Too late. What's done is done.

tero! 48531 wrote: "Officer officer! I was mugged after a hard day of pickpocketing! Can you please get me my money back?!"

inu-liger wrote: Anyways BW, whenever you get the vinyls pressed, please let me know. I'll purchase a copy.

BETA215 wrote:

inu-liger wrote: Anyways BW, whenever you get the vinyls pressed, please let me know. I'll purchase a copy.

Do you like this concert?

brians wig wrote: There's an old saying: "Don't bite the hand that feeds" and I've helped feed this community since it started, what, nearly 15 years ago now is it, and lots of people here are aware of that and appreciate it as you will see if you read this whole thread. By flaunting complete disregard for a fellow members' request to hold off for just a few weeks, I can see a lot of other people who have also fed this community will now be keeping their recordings/rarities to themselves. How's that for a result then?

The Real Wizard wrote: Isn't it interesting that every person who doesn't understand what you're saying also happens to be someone who hasn't contributed anything new to this place themselves. Funny that. The takers are obviously the experts on this matter. Continue, trolls. Continue.

tero! 48531 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote: Isn't it interesting that every person who doesn't understand what you're saying also happens to be someone who hasn't contributed anything new to this place themselves. Funny that. The takers are obviously the experts on this matter. Continue, trolls. Continue.

Just out of curiosity, which posters do you consider as trolls? Do you think that e.g. I'm a troll, or do you think that I make valid points about this situation and the traders/bootleggers?

BETA215 wrote: I think he made it quite clear. It don't need to be cleared.

tero! 48531 wrote:

BETA215 wrote: I think he made it quite clear. It don't need to be cleared.

Err.. No, he didn't make it clear. He made a general statement, apparently implicating everyone who disagrees with him. Surely that isn't the case, though?

BETA215 wrote: Err... Yes. He made it quite clear. He didn't made a very general statement. He is talking about all those people who never gave nothing to the Queen community, and now are complaining. You fit perfectly in that group. Please, learn to read and comprehend.

BETA215 wrote: I'm not a troll, but I'm going to continue. This is the link where, I think, brianswig sells the original cassette: link And for the trolls: yes. There he uploaded a sample proving the recording is real. Enjoy it. And he also sells that cine reel (8mm film) containing an audience recording of Hyde Park: link

BETA215 wrote: And he also sells that cine reel (8mm film) containing an audience recording of Hyde Park: link

Mercuryman12 wrote: Will someone send me the show! Please I cant take all of you talking about it! Please

eYe wrote: The auctions removed from ebay right after they were mentioned here makes me believe brians wig himself tried to sell the items. And I don't get why he can't still press or burn the recording even though it was already shared freely. Imho the only reason would be loosing customers/profit. Someone please explain this to me.

Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

Mercuryman12 wrote: BETA215 wrote: Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: BETA215 wrote: Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

This is the worst circus I've ever been. You can end it with a single download! Sadly, no. It gonna be worst.

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: BETA215 wrote: Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

This is the worst circus I've ever been. You can end it with a single download! Sadly, no. It gonna be worst.

Please send it to me Beta!

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote: BETA215 wrote: Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

This is the worst circus I've ever been. You can end it with a single download! Sadly, no. It gonna be worst.

Please send it to me Beta!

You told me bad things. You hurted my feelings.

BETA215 wrote: Don't try to excuse things you can't. Our thing is gone. Forget me.

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote: Don't try to excuse things you can't. Our thing is gone. Forget me.

No darling it was a faulty translation don't forget what we had over that. What we had was magic!

BETA215 wrote:

Mercuryman12 wrote:

BETA215 wrote: Don't try to excuse things you can't. Our thing is gone. Forget me.

No darling it was a faulty translation don't forget what we had over that. What we had was magic!

Now I'm not your darling! Fucking bastard! What we had was kids! And you don't support them! Fucking faggot! Fuck off! I don't want you in my life.

moonie wrote: Jesus..

moonie wrote: I've got that on a C90.. I'm not allowed to share it though..

Oscar J wrote: Yup, plenty of sour notes on there. Some standout bits here and there, but Rainbow is a far better listen overall.

eYe wrote: So, what's this now? The auctions removed from ebay right after they were mentioned here makes me believe brians wig himself tried to sell the items. And I don't get why he can't still press or burn the recording even though it was already shared freely. Imho the only reason would be loosing customers/profit. Someone please explain this to me. I managed to download the recording from the op btw. For now I won't give it to anybody, but I might simply upload my files just to stop this.

inu-liger wrote: How much do you want for the tape, BW?

inu-liger wrote: How much do you want for the tape, BW?

people on streets wrote:

inu-liger wrote: How much do you want for the tape, BW?

Why would you want it?

Holly2003 wrote: This thread is priceless

BETA215 wrote:

Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

This is the worst circus I've ever been.

inu-liger wrote:

BETA215 wrote:

Gregsynth wrote: This is a circus!

This is the worst circus I've ever been.

You clearly haven't read through the "Reaction acetate" / Dave R Fuller threads then ;)

Oscar J wrote: Yup, plenty of sour notes on there. Some standout bits here and there, but Rainbow is a far better listen overall.

brians wig wrote: Well, the bootleg companies are going to make a shit load of money out of this and I'm sorry, but I don't see why they should benefit and I don't. I was hoping to try and beat the bootleggers a bit first and, like I said, I'd been in touch with MCP, told them the situation and they said I could buy a licence which would allow me to have copies made. Being a vinyl freak, I wanted to do 50 vinyls, but that's proving difficult to do in the UK.

BETA215 wrote: David R. Fuller is actually selling a fake: the IsTTWorldWeC piano demo. Also he is selling some files you can download in my demos collection. Lil' bastard. ... How is this different from BW selling bootlegs? I thought selling multiple copies of something in the trading world was a cardinal sin.

tomchristie22 wrote: Roger sings badly here and there, but I think Freddie sounds strong overall. It was probably a stronger night than the 19th and 20th were if we consider the amount of post-improvement on the Rainbow merge. It's a worthwhile listen to hear the few unique moments, anyway, e.g. great version of Flick of the Wrist like previously mentioned, Freddie sings 'But I can't help it' rather than 'do it' on Lap of the Gods...Revisited, Freddie sings 'What more can I do' on Lap of the Gods, an octave down from how it sounds on the album, whereas he otherwise always just held the word 'gods' from the previous line and didn't sing this one.

tero! 48531 wrote: Are you in it to release it, or are you in it to make a profit??

brians wig wrote:

tero! 48531 wrote: Are you in it to release it, or are you in it to make a profit??

It's all about timing. Once the audio is out (and I thank everyone for NOT posting it publically even if some of you are inevitably sharing it privately), the bootleg firms are already geared up to get on with it. I think it's been proven that people can't wait and they'll just go pay silly money for rather than wait for me to get some done and be restricted by the length of time it takes a company to make them. Getting something pressed in England isn't something you can do in a week. I also have a life that takes up a lot of time. I think it's inevitable that the bootleggers will get there before me, in which case, what's the point. I may as well buy a copy of my own tape. I really don't need nor want to get sucked down by this whole experience and get stressed or depressed by it. What's done is done.

inu-liger wrote: Seriously Tero, do you ever have anything positive to contribute to this website instead of always attacking people and being such a snarky asshole all the time?

tero! 48531 wrote: I think that If you publicly scrap the idea of pressing your own low-cost bootleg for you and your friends, you'll prove once and for all that you only cared about the money anyway.