| Mr.Mouth 04.10.2014 06:40 |
"Rock Paradise" An Croatian magazine interviews Adam on have Freddie influence hes voice,but he says that and admit that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. There is no interview on net but i can asure you its true.. "this message is ,this message is,this message is..." |
| Mr.Mouth 04.10.2014 06:42 |
Mr.Mouth wrote: "Rock Paradise" An Croatian magazine interviews Adam on have Freddie influence hes voice,but he says that and admit that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. There is no interview on net but i can asure you its true.. "this message is ,this message is,this message is..."sorry for bad language...lol....."have" "hes" are wrong...shit bye my friends "this message is ,this message is,this message is..." |
| matt z 04.10.2014 07:03 |
Hyperbole. But Freddie definitely did as Montserrat said " he sold the voice" |
| matt z 04.10.2014 07:05 |
*^^^ it omitted my ARROWS. Anybody care to explain that bit to the guy? It MAY prevent carpal tunnel |
| wOvANz 04.10.2014 07:09 |
Who is "Adam Lambert" ? |
| Chief Mouse 04.10.2014 07:21 |
Nice sig, Matt Z :) |
| Mr.Mouth 04.10.2014 08:42 |
matt z wrote: Hyperbole. But Freddie definitely did as Montserrat said " he sold the voice"Calling All Girls..yes from that song is my signature.. "This message is,this message is,this message is..." |
| Oscar J 04.10.2014 09:04 |
Actually, though Freddie's total vocal range blitzed Lambert's when adding the additional octave he managed using his falsetto, Adam has a wider full voice range than Freddie did. Freddie had much more depth and texture to his voice though, that's where Adam falls short IMO. |
| KumoNin 04.10.2014 09:51 |
Mr Mouth... that's not a signature. |
| Stelios 04.10.2014 12:46 |
"Adam admits that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. " If thats true it has to do with the low register. Adam can go higher than Freddie and its not falsetto. For example on Who Wants To Live Forever, on 1:55 he goes live higher than Freddie even got on record. That sais something. |
| Bruno P. 04.10.2014 19:02 |
Stelios wrote: "Adam admits that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. " If thats true it has to do with the low register. Adam can go higher than Freddie and its not falsetto. For example on Who Wants To Live Forever, on 1:55 he goes live higher than Freddie even got on record. That sais something.You think that's the limit of Freddie's range? You've got a lot of research to do, son. |
| Nitroboy 04.10.2014 19:10 |
Stelios wrote: "Adam admits that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. " If thats true it has to do with the low register. Adam can go higher than Freddie and its not falsetto. For example on Who Wants To Live Forever, on 1:55 he goes live higher than Freddie even got on record. That sais something. True, he goes higher on that part than the record, because Adam Lambert loves to oversing stuff. But it wasn't higher than the highest note on the record, and definitely not Freddie's highest notes. Do your research before you troll |
| Stelios 04.10.2014 21:42 |
Bruno P. wrote:I am well aware of Freddie's range, 20 years now. I used that example becouse it was charachteristic of how Freddie even in Budapest '86 ( a GREAT performance indeed) used to sing the second part of the song almost an octave lower in the "forever'' parts whereas Adam hits some great highs on 2:50 for example.Stelios wrote: "Adam admits that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. " If thats true it has to do with the low register. Adam can go higher than Freddie and its not falsetto. For example on Who Wants To Live Forever, on 1:55 he goes live higher than Freddie even got on record. That sais something.You think that's the limit of Freddie's range? You've got a lot of research to do, son. I prefer Freddie by miles by this is just strictly talking about range. |
| Stelios 04.10.2014 21:51 |
Nitroboy wrote:Nitroboy, you really consider my response as trolling?Stelios wrote: "Adam admits that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. " If thats true it has to do with the low register. Adam can go higher than Freddie and its not falsetto. For example on Who Wants To Live Forever, on 1:55 he goes live higher than Freddie even got on record. That sais something.True, he goes higher on that part than the record, because Adam Lambert loves to oversing stuff. But it wasn't higher than the highest note on the record, and definitely not Freddie's highest notes. Do your research before you troll I explain why i used that example in the post above. As for research... i did that long time ago. These days one can simply use this : link |
| Stelios 04.10.2014 22:02 |
Of course according to THIS i am wrong. However i somehow find hard to believe that Brian can (or could) go higher than Lambert. |
| gerry 05.10.2014 03:52 |
Always said Freddie was king vocalist and Lambert should NOT be standing on a stage with Queen, because he is certainly not worthy, and i do not care what May & Taylor say because those two have made massive mistakes before Lambert was discovered with Queen. Of all the vocalists in the world and they chose a reality star! Furthermore May & Taylor have never made an announcement that Lambert is the permanent lead singer of Queen, they have just let Lambert hang around them for a least 6 years! I think they know if they had told the truth that Lambert was permanent, many Queen fans would be pissed off, i know i am, and as far as i am concerned Lambert ruins Queen. |
| matt z 05.10.2014 07:06 |
Lambert has his moments but really doesn't carry a show. It's a different generation. They LIKE the histrionics EVEN if they're unwarranted. The world (USA) has gone "gay crazy" because it AMELIORATES societal problems (go reaching for your thesaurus) Whatever. I can't change it. It's in the public's idiotic hands. Whatonce was unusual Is now common place. Where songs had originality you've got generic shit. A case could be made for the 1950's where songs were detoxed and cleaned up into doo wop complete replicating standards. So. .... Maybe. .. MAYBE in twenty or thirty years there will be something original that isn't this homogenous cookie cutter CRAP that is spewed out daily that either steals a melody or samples it. Nothing new under the sun? I don't think anybody is buying the folks that are actually trying. Don't believe it's dead. It's a commercial grab. I can accept people's scorn about Adam. Whatever. The guys want to play and stretch their career without the assistance of their self reducing of their old historical unchallenged ways. If the new Tour WAS daring and DANGEROUS they'd have put their shit in their pipes and smoked it most definitely. If they'd played alternating nights of Q1, Q2, SHA etc THEN they'd be onto something. I think it approximates what's expected of a band trying to sell their best material. TCR wasnt awful but it was pretty dull. If they had called themselves THE FIRM II they might still be together (for America) Just keep in mind the quote acknowledges a VOCAL GOD not a gifted songwriter. Different thing. Just regale at the chance of seeing these guys play again. (Even IF Roger doesn't play IM IN LOVE WITH MY CAR anymore) QUEEN: dumbed down. Watered down. Even Brian's shows seemed more fun. (But in hindsight that was 1998.... a good goddamned long time ago). Eh. Stop the comparisons. There is none. It's a decent rock revue. Go look at all the manifestations of the PLATTERS or THE TEMPTATIONS |
| gerry 05.10.2014 07:46 |
Who wants to see a watered down version of Queen? Even the tribute bands are better than the real group now! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! |
| GERRYISADICK 05.10.2014 08:17 |
gerry wrote: Who wants to see a watered down version of Queen? Even the tribute bands are better than the real group now! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!Gerry shut up you have been saying the same thing for the past 6 months and you know what? NO ONE CARES we just want to see Brian and Roger perform |
| TomP63 05.10.2014 09:02 |
Jeff we? nah not me...sorry Tom |
| gerry 05.10.2014 09:14 |
Jeff: your wrong as usual when you say nobody cares because they do. 71% of people on this site like Adam Lambert working with Queen. i will not shut up, and you are very rude. |
| gerry 05.10.2014 09:14 |
Jeff: your wrong as usual when you say nobody cares because they do. 71% of people on this site like Adam Lambert working with Queen. i will not shut up, and you are very rude. |
| Oscar J 05.10.2014 09:42 |
Seek help gerry. Back to topic: one thing I have noticed is that Adam Lambert always hits his high notes with wide open vowels, even when the lyrics have closed vowels. |
| people on streets 05.10.2014 09:48 |
matt z wrote: Lambert has his moments but really doesn't carry a show. It's a different generation. They LIKE the histrionics EVEN if they're unwarranted. The world (USA) has gone "gay crazy" because it AMELIORATES societal problems (go reaching for your thesaurus) Whatever. I can't change it. It's in the public's idiotic hands. Whatonce was unusual Is now common place. Where songs had originality you've got generic shit. A case could be made for the 1950's where songs were detoxed and cleaned up into doo wop complete replicating standards. So. .... Maybe. .. MAYBE in twenty or thirty years there will be something original that isn't this homogenous cookie cutter CRAP that is spewed out daily that either steals a melody or samples it. Nothing new under the sun?I don't think anybody is buying the folks that are actually trying. Don't believe it's dead. It's a commercial grab. I can accept people's scorn about Adam. Whatever. The guys want to play and stretch their career without the assistance of their self reducing of their old historical unchallenged ways. If the new Tour WAS daring and DANGEROUS they'd have put their shit in their pipes and smoked it most definitely. If they'd played alternating nights of Q1, Q2, SHA etc THEN they'd be onto something. I think it approximates what's expected of a band trying to sell their best material. TCR wasnt awful but it was pretty dull. If they had called themselves THE FIRM II they might still be together (for America) Just keep in mind the quote acknowledges a VOCAL GOD not a gifted songwriter. Different thing. Just regale at the chance of seeing these guys play again. (Even IF Roger doesn't play IM IN LOVE WITH MY CAR anymore) QUEEN: dumbed down. Watered down. Even Brian's shows seemed more fun. (But in hindsight that was 1998.... a good goddamned long time ago). Eh. Stop the comparisons. There is none. It's a decent rock revue. Go look at all the manifestations of the PLATTERS or THE TEMPTATIONSWell said. Went to see Brian in 1998, Brian & Roger in 2002, Q+PR 6 times in 2005 and 1 time in 2008. I enjoyed all of it, but NEVER had the illusion it was Queen I was seeing. I fully understand people who want to go and see a Q+AL show. Personally, I don't care anymore. I've seen Brian + Roger enough now. Other bands have far better live shows. |
| matt z 05.10.2014 09:49 |
|
| matt z 05.10.2014 09:54 |
Oscar J wrote: Seek help gerry. Back to topic: one thing I have noticed is that Adam Lambert always hits his high notes with wide open vowels, even when the lyrics have closed vowels.Are you for REEEEEEAAAAAAYYYYAYAYA YEEEAAAAAYY AYYY UH AYYYYYYEEELEEEAYAYYYYYAHHHHY YAAAAY YEEEAY-AH ?!!! |
| The King Of Rhye 05.10.2014 10:39 |
matt z wrote: The world (USA) has gone "gay crazy" because it AMELIORATES societal problems (go reaching for your thesaurus)Uhhhh.............okay, I kinda agree with MOST of what you said.............but what the hell does have to do with anything??? |
| gerry 05.10.2014 11:38 |
OSCAR J: Don't you dare tell me to get help you ignorant wanker. My views on here are as valid as any ones views. You need to get some manners, and let people express what they have to say. |
| Oscar J 05.10.2014 14:37 |
*Sniff sniff, wah wah* I really don't know if your views are worth as much as anyones... perhaps they would be if you didn't say the same thing in every post. |
| Bruno P. 05.10.2014 22:56 |
Stelios wrote:So you know that Freddie's 'full voice' range was pretty limited in mid 80's, unlike early 80's.Bruno P. wrote:I am well aware of Freddie's range, 20 years now. I used that example becouse it was charachteristic of how Freddie even in Budapest '86 ( a GREAT performance indeed) used to sing the second part of the song almost an octave lower in the "forever'' parts whereas Adam hits some great highs on 2:50 for example. I prefer Freddie by miles by this is just strictly talking about range.Stelios wrote: "Adam admits that he is limited in range camparing to Freddie. " If thats true it has to do with the low register. Adam can go higher than Freddie and its not falsetto. For example on Who Wants To Live Forever, on 1:55 he goes live higher than Freddie even got on record. That sais something.You think that's the limit of Freddie's range? You've got a lot of research to do, son. |
| Stelios 06.10.2014 06:50 |
^^^ Gimme The Prize is mid eighties and is more than full voice. Its "super full- extra gritty voice" and also hits some nasty D5's. Live is another package os sausages more to do with beeing tired from touring and his "more macho" technique around that years. I think his full voice only suffered through the AIDS years (innuendo/made in heaven). However by that time he had mastered such a great technique for "head voice" that it almost sounds like full or chest voice. The show must go on, is a great example. |
| Oscar J 06.10.2014 10:34 |
Every note he hit that was like Bb4 or higher had some head voice in it, including the high notes in Gimme The Prize. It's sort of a mix between chest and head voice. He didn't lose his full voice when he suffered from aids, he just lost chest power, meaning that his mixed voice had more "head" in it. Sounds just as stunning. |
| gerry 06.10.2014 10:55 |
yes freddies vocal on "Mother Love" was spectacular for a man that was a skeleton and dying. He still had a lot of vocal power right up to the very end and that should be commended. |
| Mr.QueenFan 06.10.2014 19:02 |
So many Queen fans in denial, it's not even funny. Use your ears and appreciate talent when you see one. Adam Lambert is in the group of the greatest vocalists alive today, and stating it doesn't diminish Freddie or any other vocalist. Freddie was great and Adam is great. There's no need for people to be fucking around in the bushes denying the obvious. Adam has a bigger range that Freddie Mercury. And please, let's not talk about the lower range and be picky about this. We all now that Freddie is recognized by his upper register, not his lower register. And when people talk about range, they talk about higher register, because no one gives a fuck about lower register Guiness records. I do, because i love and respect all musicians, but in this case we all know what we're talking about here. In fact Adam Lambert was the best thing that could have happen to Queen fans and Queenzone in particular. For the last 15 years i saw people ridiculing other artists based on Freddie's range - Tribute concert anyone?? The amount of disrespect for other artists that goes on on this community and in this site is just ridiculous. Even Paul Rodgers - one of the greatest rock vocalists of all time - was slamed by QZer's who just don't know shit about music, but needed the attention. Now appears this guy - Adam Lambert - who can reach all Freddie's notes when he sings live without breaking a sweat- something that even Freddie couldn't do with the consistency of Adam (the nodules, i know!) - and people get all deffensive saying that it's not just the range, is the tone, the soul, blah blah blah. This was what me and others - who love music - kept saying when people slamed Paul Rodgers and others. You can't have it both ways! How does it feel to write something your ears don't agree with? P.S. - For all people who disagree with me - i'm right and you're wrong! It is what it is, and taste has nothing to do with it. Thanks and goodbye! |
| Stelios 06.10.2014 19:37 |
^^^ Agree 100% about the range and the "who gives a fuck about the lower register". However if Freddie had a better lower register that means more body to the mid register.And a lot of the times we hear that part too (the mid register) even if it does not have the WOW factor. But is does play a role in a how a vocalist builds up his performance and the impact the song itself has to the listener in the end. |
| The Real Wizard 06.10.2014 21:56 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote: Even Paul Rodgers - one of the greatest rock vocalists of all time - was slamed by QZer's who just don't know shit about music, but needed the attention.Yup. Rodgers nailed the chorus of Champions every night. Mercury nailed it maybe five times in his career. Facts. Don't they just suck? |
| Gregsynth 06.10.2014 22:15 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Six times! :DMr.QueenFan wrote: Even Paul Rodgers - one of the greatest rock vocalists of all time - was slamed by QZer's who just don't know shit about music, but needed the attention.Yup. Rodgers nailed the chorus of Champions every night. Mercury nailed it maybe five times in his career. Facts. Don't they just suck? |
| matt z 07.10.2014 00:15 |
The King Of Rhye wrote:Okay.matt z wrote: The world (USA) has gone "gay crazy" because it AMELIORATES societal problems (go reaching for your thesaurus)Uhhhh.............okay, I kinda agree with MOST of what you said.............but what the hell does have to do with anything??? In hindsight probably this: The performing band wants to capitalize on the gay thing (for ideal reasons being THE MERCURY PHOENIX TRUST for AIDS which in the "first world" is still predominantly homosexual; don't know why they didn't promote it at the shows) So picking an avowed homosexual would hit that TARGET AUDIENCE (marketing terms) Maybe the "dangerous" thing they were talking about was to be touring with a cookie cutter pop star from a nation wide singing contest. I don't know. The set list didn't really reflect danger. Something like that. Jumping on a bandwagon. It's getting to the point you can't even say QUEER The brain in me suspects social engineering. That's all I meant by that rambling comment. If society doesn't recognize the damage done to the BIOLOGICAL family by suggesting that GENDER ROLES HAVE NO MEANING. ... then something's amiss. Next time we vote for equality....on a sinking ship. .. It'd better be EVERYONE FOR THEMSELVES instead of this women and children $#!# ... you KNOW who'd win that bit. It seems lately through the media that anyone who ISN'T gay is the exception. As if hetero perspectives are somehow now illogical. Anyways At the end of the day FREDDIE was an artist Adam Lambert is a performing act. Though I wish him well. I wouldn't be red in the face if he ever dropped an amazing album that blew everyone away. I'd be happy for him. But pop as it is, being homogenized with so many company writers. ... it's just "Meh". He's not bad for the gig. His over singing CAN be. (Particularly if the song doesn't warrant it) |
| Stelios 07.10.2014 05:39 |
matt z wrote: That's all I meant by that rambling comment. If society doesn't recognize the damage done to the BIOLOGICAL family by suggesting that GENDER ROLES HAVE NO MEANING. ... then something's amiss.I dont think that we are at the point to say GENDER ROLES HAVE NO MEANING. But so does Social Status, Financial Resources even Color of the parents to a digree. However for a kid to be raised in a orphanage or given to foster family with no skills for good parenting, gender roles are secondary becouse a family dosent live in a vacum for the kid not to be exposed to them.Perhaps not idealy, but still... |
| Oscar J 07.10.2014 05:56 |
double post |
| Oscar J 07.10.2014 05:56 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote: So many Queen fans in denial, it's not even funny. Use your ears and appreciate talent when you see one. Adam Lambert is in the group of the greatest vocalists alive today, and stating it doesn't diminish Freddie or any other vocalist. Freddie was great and Adam is great. There's no need for people to be fucking around in the bushes denying the obvious. Adam has a bigger range that Freddie Mercury. And please, let's not talk about the lower range and be picky about this. We all now that Freddie is recognized by his upper register, not his lower register. In fact Adam Lambert was the best thing that could have happen to Queen fans and Queenzone in particular. For the last 15 years i saw people ridiculing other artists based on Freddie's range - Tribute concert anyone?? The amount of disrespect for other artists that goes on on this community and in this site is just ridiculous. Even Paul Rodgers - one of the greatest rock vocalists of all time - was slamed by QZer's who just don't know shit about music, but needed the attention. Now appears this guy - Adam Lambert - who can reach all Freddie's notes when he sings live without breaking a sweat- something that even Freddie couldn't do with the consistency of Adam (the nodules, i know!) - and people get all deffensive saying that it's not just the range, is the tone, the soul, blah blah blah. This was what me and others - who love music - kept saying when people slamed Paul Rodgers and others. You can't have it both ways! How does it feel to write something your ears don't agree with? P.S. - For all people who disagree with me - i'm right and you're wrong! It is what it is, and taste has nothing to do with it. Thanks and goodbye!Honestly I don't think you got very many things right in this post. 1. Vocal range by definition means the span of notes a vocalist is able to produce, meaning that you have to include the lower notes as well, regardless of what people "care about". Facts are that Freddie had a four octave range (F2-F6) while Adam's is just over 3 (G#2-B5), both excluding spoken/fry notes. 2. Even when we only consider high notes, Freddie could go significantly higher than Adam, simply because he comfortably could go well into the 6th octave both live and in the studio. The only advantage Adam has over Freddie is when we're talking about "full voice". Adam is able to seamlessly move into a very heady and in my opinion rather thin sounding register that could be considered "full voice". 3. Even though I don't have anything against Lambert, I don't see why we can't have it "both ways" as you say it. Theres nothing technically wrong with saying one artists has the tone and feel but not the range, while another's got the range, but not the tone and feel. 4. I don't think there's any "right and wrong" in this discussion. Maybe you were joking. |
| gerry 07.10.2014 07:54 |
Mr. Queen fan: you are obviously stone deaf if you think Lambert is as great a singer as Freddie was. Freddie Mercury is a legend & Adam Lambert is a nobody Lamberts voice is not right for Queens Music, but would be ok if he was in U2.. |
| Day dop 07.10.2014 12:10 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote: Adam has a bigger range that Freddie Mercury.Nope. link |
| gerry 07.10.2014 12:52 |
Mr Queenfan: Lambert shrieks when he hits the high notes, you need your ears syringing darling. |
| matt z 07.10.2014 16:27 |
FREDDIE'S VOICE SOUNDS BEST FOR QUEEN BECAUSE. .. (!) ....mm Drum roll please .... The songs were written BY and often FOR his voice. The reason Adam sounds amiss (vocal acrobatics aside) is because his voice is thin. It doesn't fill in the frequency range. He was by far the most active guy on stage during the tour. But that ain't saying much. It's not like they sat like BB KING but it was pretty close ;-) (exaggerating) |
| Stelios 08.10.2014 08:32 |
^^^ Very true. Even Brian has admitted it while writting songs that were about to be sung my Freddie |
| Bruno P. 09.10.2014 09:34 |
Oscar J wrote: The only advantage Adam has over Freddie is when we're talking about "full voice". Adam is able to seamlessly move into a very heady and in my opinion rather thin sounding register that could be considered "full voice".Well, I know what you're saying and I agree, but Adam had to sing falsetto notes where Freddie wouldn't. Case in point - The Show Must Go On. Adam sings the highest note in pure falsetto and sounds bland and weak. Freddie used mixed voice and sounded much better and stronger, even if he didn't have as much power as he had before. I sincerely doubt Adam could reach notes like the last note in It's a Hard Life with pure chest voice. He would use falsetto and sound really bad, as he always does. I know people who can go much higher than Adam but would fall short singing with full voice. Range does not mean much when you sound like a dying goat. That's what many people can not understand. Take We Will Rock You as an example - Adam hits the notes, but sounds so weak it's laughable and embarrassing at the same time. |
| SweetCaroline 09.10.2014 10:31 |
I don't play guitar, but it has been said that Adam can sing every note on the guitar from the lowest to the highest. He gets pretty high in "A Time For Miracles"-- this is the song that blew Brian May's mind when he first heard it ..... link |
| brENsKi 09.10.2014 10:36 |
gerry wrote:Mr. Queen fan: you are obviously stone deaf if you think Lambert is as great a singer as Freddie was.no he isn't. if he were "stone deaf" he'd be completely unable to hear ANYTHING at all. so he'd not be making any comment at all. and while we're at it "stone deaf" is an insult to those who are completely deaf - the correct term (although not on the occasion YOU used it) is "profoundly deaf" The correct term YOU are looking for is "tone deaf". almost everything you've ever said here is riddled with glaring mistakes. 2 out of 10...must do better. |
| gerry 09.10.2014 10:38 |
Brian is a well mannered guy and too easy to disagree with anyone these days. He has also made some terrible mistakes to which rows in the Queen camp erupted so take what Brian said with a pinch of salt caroline. Who wants to hear a singer screach and Lambert does like a constipated cat! |
| gerry 09.10.2014 10:40 |
Brenski: winding me up is not working mate so take your tacky comments and stick them up your smug little ass. |
| brENsKi 09.10.2014 10:43 |
gerry wrote: Brenski: winding me up is not working mate so take your tacky comments and stick them up your smug little ass.it clearly is - because you bothered to reply, you drip. |
| gerry 09.10.2014 10:51 |
Yeah because prats do not get the better of me so fuck off. |
| YAFF 09.10.2014 10:57 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote: Adam Lambert is in the group of the greatest vocalists alive today, and stating it doesn't diminish Freddie or any other vocalist. Freddie was great and Adam is great.bollocks. If Freddie is great Adam Lambert must be "very good" at best. As many have said- hitting notes is far less important than the tone/timbre. Adam Lambert will never rank as one of the "greatest singers" of all time. |
| brENsKi 09.10.2014 11:13 |
gerry wrote:Yeah because prats do not get the better of me so fuck off.well either this ^^^ is a downright lie or I mustn't be a pratt after all. because i always get the better of you. it's not much of a shooting match to be honest. every time i see your name in the "last post" column it's a f**king given that the content of the post will be completely and utterly inaccurate bollocks or wildly speculative statements riddled with spelling mistakes and verbal abuse. picking holes in YOUR posts is less challenging than shooting fish in a barrel. every new post you make excels the stupidity of your previous dickography. you should be proud. |
| The Real Wizard 09.10.2014 17:31 |
gerry wrote: Brian has also made some terrible mistakes to which rows in the Queen camp erupted so take what Brian said with a pinch of saltDo you have any actual proof that Brian created more fights than any of the other band members, entourage, colleagues, producers, etc. did, in order to justify this character assassination you're attempting ? Obviously you don't. But even if it were true - what does that have to do with him being a reliable source of information? |
| brENsKi 13.10.2014 10:18 |
The Real Wizard wrote:"obviously" - he does. In his mind.gerry wrote: Brian has also made some terrible mistakes to which rows in the Queen camp erupted so take what Brian said with a pinch of saltDo you have any actual proof that Brian created more fights than any of the other band members, entourage, colleagues, producers, etc. did, in order to justify this character assassination you're attempting ? Obviously you don't. |
| SweetCaroline 13.10.2014 10:38 |
I want to clear up what was said about Adam singing in falsetto. He does not use falsetto when hitting those high notes. He's not Robin Thicke. The Show Must Go On -- Detroit (Auburn Hills): link |