Dear lord, that looks and sounds so good.
If there is any autotune, it's so subtle. I didn't notice it.
It's just the way it goes. Live albums have been fiddled with in the studio since the 70s.
It dies make me despair when people comment on the audio quality being so good for 40 years of age - it's been remixed from the master multi track with all today's technology, plug ins etc etc at their disposal, so of course it sounds good!!
Then again, what's their excuse for the sound on the MK Bowl release then?!?
^ I don't think he is moaning, just stating fact.
It's good news that the actual release is, like the original, interlaced and hasn't gone through a de-interlacing process.
It's also good news for those people who still use CRT's to view.
It's not so good news for those who use LCD's.
It's bad news we have a 29.97 frame rate on the discs..
Barry Durex wrote:
^ I don't think he is moaning, just stating fact.
It's good news that the actual release is, like the original, interlaced and hasn't gone through a de-interlacing process.
It's also good news for those people who still use CRT's to view.
It's not so good news for those who use LCD's.
It's bad news we have a 29.97 frame rate on the discs..
Good, if you're right.
For me, forthcoming release Live At the Rainbow in 100 percent better, than re-re-re-re-release Live At Wembley.
Barry Durex wrote: ^ I don't think he is moaning, just stating fact.
It's good news that the actual release is, like the original, interlaced and hasn't gone through a de-interlacing process.
It's also good news for those people who still use CRT's to view.
It's not so good news for those who use LCD's.
It's bad news we have a 29.97 frame rate on the discs..
How do you know the original tapes are interlaced? They were European tapes, so most definitely PAL.
I still don't understand why they don't just do a NTSC release in whatever region(s) use that format, and then a PAL in whatever region(s) that use PAL - doing anything else is stupid in my eyes.