The question then follows: if you are talking about nothing, does that make it into something by virtue of it being objectified? Ahh, ontology, making philosophers crazy since 500 BC...
On topic: I have trouble believing that Queen Elizabeth is really a seven-foot tall alien lizard. A five-foot-five alien lizard, maybe, but not a seven-foot one. I also find it unlikely that the biggest conspiracy in history would be unraveled by a none-too-bright ex-football player.
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
The question then follows: if you are talking about nothing, does that make it into something by virtue of it being objectified? Ahh, ontology, making philosophers crazy since 500 BC...
On topic: I have trouble believing that Queen Elizabeth is really a seven-foot tall alien lizard. A five-foot-five alien lizard, maybe, but not a seven-foot one. I also find it unlikely that the biggest conspiracy in history would be unraveled by a none-too-bright ex-football player.
Yeah.
And FLASH didn't save the universe... right? ... whatever buddy.... Whaaaaaaaaatever.