QueenZone discussion #1380678

barnsleybob wrote: Ive never seen Queen live,basically because I was a little too young back in the day. Ive seen Youtube clips of Adam Lambert with Queen and I must admit the guy has one hell of a voice. Unfortunately I wont be able to see the concerts because I live in the UK. Why arn't there any dates for the UK? I mean it's a UK band so it's gonna be hard for a lot of die hard UK and European fans to just jump on a plane to the US plus the massive expense in flights etc. I feel a little peeved that this is a US only tour and they are not doing maybe a few dates back in the UK. Question for the people that do have tickets. Do you feel the same excitement as you would if it was a line up with Freddie singing? Like I say Adam has a terrific voice but if I was lucky enough to go Id still couldnt build up complete excitement if I was seeing the Original Queen. It would feel to me more like a glorified Queen tribute band if you see what I mean. Still probably going to be an amazing show but if I went and was later asked if i'd ever seen Queen live id have to answer yes and no rather than yes.!!

barnsleybob wrote: I was aware but I couldnt get a ticket or time off. My circumstances jobwise has changed for the better and I would be buying a ticket day one if they came back to the UK. Ill take a look at the link you sent me. I just hope they do come over here. Is there a reason why they havent chosen (as yet) to do a few UK dates? It doesn't have to be big,just half a dozen to please european fans.

barnsleybob wrote: I didn't see it no. I'll try and look for it. yeah I agree they have a lot to fit in and would need to be spread over a longer period, but there are a lot of US dates,24 in total compared to 0 in europe. Or there maybe a break of a year or so then do one for europe perhaps.

barnsleybob wrote: I didn't see it no. I'll try and look for it. yeah I agree they have a lot to fit in and would need to be spread over a longer period, but there are a lot of US dates,24 in total compared to 0 in europe. Or there maybe a break of a year or so then do one for europe perhaps.

barnsleybob wrote: Is this new? Are these requested countries or countries Queen are intending to play in now?

barnsleybob wrote: I agree Taptap. Adam has an amazing vocal range and his version of Who wants to live forever actually makes my hairs on my back stand up and that is one of my favourite songs. Not only that he does have a good flamboyant stage prescence ,,not as connecting and energetic as Freddie was though but he does have that certain 'Je ne sais quoi' about him that makes him fit in. I agree I cant think of anybody better than him to front the band although I did like George Michael and can understand why he would have been a serious replacement option 20yrs ago. Id actually never heard of A.L until he came into queen although I know now he was in Glee. Having a different singer though does give it that sort of 'tribute act' feel to it on a very good scale though but it is the best we have got and would love to see the show.

ANAGRAMER wrote: The second part of your question is intriguing: Do fans feel the same excitement as they would if Freddie was singing? I fear the answer is no but I would think that the actual show in terms of production would be much the same Being in the position of having seen Queen with Freddie in '79, '82 (twice,) and '86, there was a tangible and genuine excitement at these concerts which only a genuine 'star' for want of a better word, can generate. Seeing Freddie live was an EVENT! I don't think I need elaborate on his talents on stage however, having the 82 shows at close hand, the guy's stage presence was overwhelming. When he was onstage, he performed for every second of every show, remarkable charisma and stamina. His sense of humour and awareness of how ridiculous and preposterous live rock music can be only endeared him, even to die-hard metal-heads That is something irreplaceable, the lack of which, I'm afraid, was apparent on the QPR tours

SweetCaroline wrote:

barnsleybob wrote: I didn't see it no. I'll try and look for it. yeah I agree they have a lot to fit in and would need to be spread over a longer period, but there are a lot of US dates,24 in total compared to 0 in europe. Or there maybe a break of a year or so then do one for europe perhaps.

Here's what I posted last Saturday on the QAL 2014 Summer Tour thread: "OH MY GOD: This is trending on twitter right now-- #MoreQueenAdamLambertDatesWorldWide and the countries this is being tweeted from include Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, Armenia, Holland, Norway, South America, Finland, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, UK, Uruguay, Portugal, Argentina, Venezuela, Paraguay, Chile, Russia, Ukrania, Romania, Belgium, Turkey, Bulgaria"

Wiley wrote: I was almost 5 years old the last time Queen toured so I have no idea what that was, other than what I've seen in documentaries which happen to be "Queen Documentaries" so they are biased. Having said that, let me go on a limb and play Devil's Advocate here... What do you think must have been a bigger deal for public in general (and also Queen fans in particular)...? (a) Queen announcing their -say- 1980 tour when they had been touring every year for the last 12 years? (b) Brian and Roger announcing their first proper tour in 19 years. While I'm too young to remember the former, I remember perfectly when the latter. I believe it was December 10th, 2004, I was on the Electronics Lab at my University and I checked Brian's Soapbox (in between clases!). Apparently they had mentioned the tour in a German show (Wetten Das?, I think) and I remember being very excited.

master marathon runner wrote: Reading all these great and respectful posts, makes me so grateful and appreciative that I was lucky enough to see the original Queen 7 times.

SweetCaroline wrote: Found this website with a pretty comprehensive listing of all of the Queen concerts going back to 1970: link I was too busy in the '70's with two little babies to even think about attending rock concerts when the original Queen band was touring in the U.S.

The King Of Rhye wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Found this website with a pretty comprehensive listing of all of the Queen concerts going back to 1970: link I was too busy in the '70's with two little babies to even think about attending rock concerts when the original Queen band was touring in the U.S.

that is a pretty cool and useful site I must say..... I was 5 years old when they played their last US concert with Freddie, so I am happy for any chance to see em now....it was a good thing for me, tho, that they joined forces with one singer who was ALWAYS one of my favorites (Paul), and then one who I am quickly gaining appreciation for.....(I listen to that 'Still Rock In Hammersmith' bootleg all the time!) Out of curiousity, Caroline......are you closer to Detroit or Chicago? just wonderin....

The King Of Rhye wrote: one further thought that just came to me.......I distinctly remember reading some article in the lead up to the Queen + Paul collaboration...., I think in a guitar magazine, where Brian was saying they had serious thoughts about doing a tour or something with Robbie Williams but ultimately decided against it cus they thought something like..........uh, I forget exactly how Brian worded it....but something to the effect of that Robbie's fans were a totally different crowd from Queen fans...........now couldn't the same thing be said about Queen and Adam?? The cynical side of me thinks maybe the ticket sales for the Q+PR tour weren;t quite as good as Brian and Roger wanted, so they decided to try to bring in some younger fans?? Or a different kind of fan............ Not that I am complaining for one minute about their choice.....:) Dang, long post....................

taptap wrote:

The King Of Rhye wrote: one further thought that just came to me.......I distinctly remember reading some article in the lead up to the Queen + Paul collaboration...., I think in a guitar magazine, where Brian was saying they had serious thoughts about doing a tour or something with Robbie Williams but ultimately decided against it cus they thought something like..........uh, I forget exactly how Brian worded it....but something to the effect of that Robbie's fans were a totally different crowd from Queen fans...........now couldn't the same thing be said about Queen and Adam?? The cynical side of me thinks maybe the ticket sales for the Q+PR tour weren;t quite as good as Brian and Roger wanted, so they decided to try to bring in some younger fans?? Or a different kind of fan............ Not that I am complaining for one minute about their choice.....:) Dang, long post....................

I don't know who Robbie Williams audience is, but I think Brian is probably thinking about genre interest.  Adam's fans off of American Idol (in the US) are older because that's the demo of American Idol now.  However unlike a lot of AI alums, he's broken out of the AI bubble very well, and esp. due to his appearances on Pretty Little Liars and Glee, has become exposed to a much younger demo.  That's in the US - outside of the US, where he has a very healthy fanbase in many other countries, his fans skew much, much younger.  I think Adam's AI fans and Queen's fans share a similar demo in terms of age and genre interest, and Adam's out of the AI bubble and international fans bring a new generation of listeners to the mix - where genre is going to be important, but so is generational continuity.  It's going to be a very interesting mix of concert goers, I think.

SweetCaroline wrote: Adam was the chief writer on this amazing song along with David Marshall, Fred Williams, Catt Gravitt and Robert Marvin. I can picture an equally amazing music video to go with this music: Runnin' link Here's another song that many people are not aware of from the Trespassing album because it was on the EU version: "Map" link

SweetCaroline wrote: BV, this has been a positive thread until you show up like a bad penny to spoil it. I'm not the one who is bitching about cover songs! Adam won't be singing any of his songs at this Queen concert. As a fan of Queen music and the brilliant way Adam sings it, I am more than happy about that!

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: BV, this has been a positive thread until you show up like a bad penny to spoil it. I'm not the one who is bitching about cover songs! Adam won't be singing any of his songs at this Queen concert. As a fan of Queen music and the brilliant way Adam sings it, I am more than happy about that!

Spoil it? Bitching? LOL, says you who went into a rage like a 3 year old recently? Yes, sure you are a Queen fan, if you say so. Pity you don't discuss it much unless it includes AL. You are so wanting to promote the guy anywhere/anyway possible.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: BV, this has been a positive thread until you show up like a bad penny to spoil it. I'm not the one who is bitching about cover songs! Adam won't be singing any of his songs at this Queen concert. As a fan of Queen music and the brilliant way Adam sings it, I am more than happy about that!

Spoil it? Bitching? LOL, says you who went into a rage like a 3 year old recently? Yes, sure you are a Queen fan, if you say so. Pity you don't discuss it much unless it includes AL. You are so wanting to promote the guy anywhere/anyway possible.

How ironic, as I'm positive everyone here has noticed you don't talk about Queen at all - the very thing you're constantly accusing SC of.  It's also just as obvious that the only reason you're here is to follow two posters (or should I say four?) whining about the same three things over and over again.  So let me calm your nerves: 1. Yes, I'm an Adam fan, ergo I say good things about him (what you refer to as promoting).  And yes, we all know you find this shocking, although no one understands why.  But there you are - carry on. 2. No, no one is aware of you being called a homophobe or hater except for you, which you repeat, again, adnauseum.  Lather, rinse and repeat at QOL and now here at QZ. 3. No, I'm not Adam's 'wannabe spokesman', as I do very little for free, although absolutely, I'm a fan (as already stated in item 1), so you'll find me saying good things about him on a thread that's about him and Queen.  Again, I know this is perfectly oh deary me shocking to you, but it's perfectly understandable to everyone else here, even I suspect, among those that don't like Lambert.  Fandom online - it's sort of a thing that's been around for a while now, pretty much since the invention of the internet.   Meanwhile, it's perfectly clear to everyone here that your purpose at QZ has nothing to do with Queen and everything to do with your weird dislike of SweetCaroline/CNB/taptap/Mithril or whoever you ramble about at any given moment because the fact that they're fans of Adam irritates you irrationally.  And irrationally is the key word here.  I know you're desperate to get people to engage you in conversation, but it will never happen when the technique you use is to badger, insult, and harass them with the same 3 irrational complaints over and over again.  They didn't make sense the first time you did it on QOL, and they don't make sense after the dozen attempts here at QZ.  Get a clue - it's not working and you're making yourself look really cray in the attempt.  You really should try for even just a tiny bit of self-awareness and you might be a happier person.

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: BV, this has been a positive thread until you show up like a bad penny to spoil it. I'm not the one who is bitching about cover songs! Adam won't be singing any of his songs at this Queen concert. As a fan of Queen music and the brilliant way Adam sings it, I am more than happy about that!

Spoil it? Bitching? LOL, says you who went into a rage like a 3 year old recently? Yes, sure you are a Queen fan, if you say so. Pity you don't discuss it much unless it includes AL. You are so wanting to promote the guy anywhere/anyway possible.

How ironic, as I'm positive everyone here has noticed you don't talk about Queen at all - the very thing you're constantly accusing SC of.  It's also just as obvious that the only reason you're here is to follow two posters (or should I say four?) whining about the same three things over and over again.  So let me calm your nerves: 1. Yes, I'm an Adam fan, ergo I say good things about him (what you refer to as promoting).  And yes, we all know you find this shocking, although no one understands why.  But there you are - carry on. 2. No, no one is aware of you being called a homophobe or hater except for you, which you repeat, again, adnauseum.  Lather, rinse and repeat at QOL and now here at QZ. 3. No, I'm not Adam's 'wannabe spokesman', as I do very little for free, although absolutely, I'm a fan (as already stated in item 1), so you'll find me saying good things about him on a thread that's about him and Queen.  Again, I know this is perfectly oh deary me shocking to you, but it's perfectly understandable to everyone else here, even I suspect, among those that don't like Lambert.  Fandom online - it's sort of a thing that's been around for a while now, pretty much since the invention of the internet.   Meanwhile, it's perfectly clear to everyone here that your purpose at QZ has nothing to do with Queen and everything to do with your weird dislike of SweetCaroline/CNB/taptap/Mithril or whoever you ramble about at any given moment because the fact that they're fans of Adam irritates you irrationally.  And irrationally is the key word here.  I know you're desperate to get people to engage you in conversation, but it will never happen when the technique you use is to badger, insult, and harass them with the same 3 irrational complaints over and over again.  They didn't make sense the first time you did it on QOL, and they don't make sense after the dozen attempts here at QZ.  Get a clue - it's not working and you're making yourself look really cray in the attempt.  You really should try for even just a tiny bit of self-awareness and you might be a happier person.

I have talked about Queen here, that's a fact. You must be slipping on your tracking posts by the people you don't like. Care to tell me what came of your threats about forwarding my posts on? How very insulting/defensive and all out a bitch you were before you left QOL. Apparently you are one here too, with your stuck up rules you have set in place here. Get a clue, you have trashed and threatened legal action on a person you don't like. It must be a Glambert m.o. So think twice about pointing your fingers at me.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: BV, this has been a positive thread until you show up like a bad penny to spoil it. I'm not the one who is bitching about cover songs! Adam won't be singing any of his songs at this Queen concert. As a fan of Queen music and the brilliant way Adam sings it, I am more than happy about that!

Spoil it? Bitching? LOL, says you who went into a rage like a 3 year old recently? Yes, sure you are a Queen fan, if you say so. Pity you don't discuss it much unless it includes AL. You are so wanting to promote the guy anywhere/anyway possible.

How ironic, as I'm positive everyone here has noticed you don't talk about Queen at all - the very thing you're constantly accusing SC of.  It's also just as obvious that the only reason you're here is to follow two posters (or should I say four?) whining about the same three things over and over again.  So let me calm your nerves: 1. Yes, I'm an Adam fan, ergo I say good things about him (what you refer to as promoting).  And yes, we all know you find this shocking, although no one understands why.  But there you are - carry on. 2. No, no one is aware of you being called a homophobe or hater except for you, which you repeat, again, adnauseum.  Lather, rinse and repeat at QOL and now here at QZ. 3. No, I'm not Adam's 'wannabe spokesman', as I do very little for free, although absolutely, I'm a fan (as already stated in item 1), so you'll find me saying good things about him on a thread that's about him and Queen.  Again, I know this is perfectly oh deary me shocking to you, but it's perfectly understandable to everyone else here, even I suspect, among those that don't like Lambert.  Fandom online - it's sort of a thing that's been around for a while now, pretty much since the invention of the internet.   Meanwhile, it's perfectly clear to everyone here that your purpose at QZ has nothing to do with Queen and everything to do with your weird dislike of SweetCaroline/CNB/taptap/Mithril or whoever you ramble about at any given moment because the fact that they're fans of Adam irritates you irrationally.  And irrationally is the key word here.  I know you're desperate to get people to engage you in conversation, but it will never happen when the technique you use is to badger, insult, and harass them with the same 3 irrational complaints over and over again.  They didn't make sense the first time you did it on QOL, and they don't make sense after the dozen attempts here at QZ.  Get a clue - it's not working and you're making yourself look really cray in the attempt.  You really should try for even just a tiny bit of self-awareness and you might be a happier person.

I have talked about Queen here, that's a fact. You must be slipping on your tracking posts by the people you don't like. Care to tell me what came of your threats about forwarding my posts on? How very insulting/defensive and all out a bitch you were before you left QOL. Apparently you are one here too, with your stuck up rules you have set in place here. Get a clue, you have trashed and threatened legal action on a person you don't like. It must be a Glambert m.o. So think twice about pointing your fingers at me.

What I think is that you're talking to yourself here, just like you're forced to at QOL.  Enjoy yourself.

Black Velvet wrote:

You are talking total bullshit. Many people talk to me over there about many topics. You have sweetcaroline and you think you have AL, so you must defend/promote him. 

I laugh at you and sweetcaroline. Blaming me for a ban, you think someone else is here with no proof whatsoever. You both are deluded and the true meaning of cray, you proved it on QOL and now here. I hope more can see it for themselves.

SweetCaroline wrote: Sweet Caroline ..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vhFnTjia_I ..... and this one a year ago ..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF__vAm_qRM

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

You are talking total bullshit. Many people talk to me over there about many topics. You have sweetcaroline and you think you have AL, so you must defend/promote him. 

I laugh at you and sweetcaroline. Blaming me for a ban, you think someone else is here with no proof whatsoever. You both are deluded and the true meaning of cray, you proved it on QOL and now here. I hope more can see it for themselves.

What everyone can see is that you're a raving lunatic chasing shadows that have nothing to do with this thread, or any thread on this whole forum. --------> Thunder is thata way And once again you seem to be confused about who's who, unless you think SweetCaroline and I are the same person. P.S. SweetCaroline, I thought it was gonna be tough business, with just you and me racing to fill every seat in every arena to fool the media that QAL actually has real demand and a real audience, but whew, I better start cross-training if it's just me out there!  Also I am so broke buying out all those arenas!

Black Velvet wrote:

You are mithril from QOL who is no longer there, hmmm I wonder why. Those threats you made and wanted more Glamberts in on it. Whatever for? My talking to someone who you don't like? You petty, vindictive person. 

Sweetcaroline is CNB. All very easy to figure out thanks to you both on QZ. You both slip over yourselves in placing blame and your rules.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

You are mithril from QOL who is no longer there, hmmm I wonder why. Those threats you made and wanted more Glamberts in on it. Whatever for? My talking to someone who you don't like? You petty, vindictive person. 

Sweetcaroline is CNB. All very easy to figure out thanks to you both on QZ. You both slip over yourselves in placing blame and your rules.

Seriously, you be cray, girl.

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

You are mithril from QOL who is no longer there, hmmm I wonder why. Those threats you made and wanted more Glamberts in on it. Whatever for? My talking to someone who you don't like? You petty, vindictive person. 

Sweetcaroline is CNB. All very easy to figure out thanks to you both on QZ. You both slip over yourselves in placing blame and your rules.

Seriously, you be cray, girl.

Says the wannabe spokesperson for AL and the Glamberts. sweetcaroline made it very clear who she was when she blamed me for her ban. You here with your so called rules with a board that has so little rules to begin with. Did I disturb a convo between you two or something in this this thread. You both are deluded and crazy. I'd take a long look at your tactics. Not liking a person because of talking with someone else, and your threat of forwarding my posts on.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

You are mithril from QOL who is no longer there, hmmm I wonder why. Those threats you made and wanted more Glamberts in on it. Whatever for? My talking to someone who you don't like? You petty, vindictive person. 

Sweetcaroline is CNB. All very easy to figure out thanks to you both on QZ. You both slip over yourselves in placing blame and your rules.

Seriously, you be cray, girl.

Says the wannabe spokesperson for AL and the Glamberts. sweetcaroline made it very clear who she was when she blamed me for her ban. You here with your so called rules with a board that has so little rules to begin with. Did I disturb a convo between you two or something in this this thread. You both are deluded and crazy. I'd take a long look at your tactics. Not liking a person because of talking with someone else, and your threat of forwarding my posts on.

Look, you're not cray because you think you know who we are in different spots on the internet.  Unless your real name is Icy or Black Velvet, no one knows anyone here save for what they say and their handle.  You're cray because you're obsessed with who strangers are and what they say to you - ON THE INTERNET!  You need to take a step back and evaluate why that is.  As for me, I couldn't care less what some anonymous cray says to me or thinks of me - ON THE INTERNET!  You can keep saying the same irrelevant nonsense till the cows come home, but no one cares.  Except you.  That's why you're cray. Bored now.

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

FreddieCat wrote: Just listened to the iHeartRadio youtube again. It really was a beautiful performance. At this moment in time I believe QAL is a solid unit. Hopefully they can remain and grow together in music and in spirit throughout the tour. The tour show(s) should be an exciting experience for all fans, old and new.

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

What the hell?  How is a post on trolls the same as rules?  If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb).  None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did.  Neither of which is a rule.  Duh.  Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit. Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

What the hell?  How is a post on trolls the same as rules?  If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb).  None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did.  Neither of which is a rule.  Duh.  Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit. Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).

SweetCaroline wrote: I'm posting this for Black Velvet/icy because she's such a huge Adam Lambert fan: link Hee! Hee!

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

What the hell?  How is a post on trolls the same as rules?  If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb).  None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did.  Neither of which is a rule.  Duh.  Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit. Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).

In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod. Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me. Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote: Just listened to the iHeartRadio youtube again. It really was a beautiful performance. At this moment in time I believe QAL is a solid unit. Hopefully they can remain and grow together in music and in spirit throughout the tour. The tour show(s) should be an exciting experience for all fans, old and new.

Nice post! Thanks for getting this thread back on topic! Have you been able to watch the whole show they did in Kiev, Ukraine in 2012? That outdoor square where they performed before 250,000 people was so magnificent and I feel so sad that the same place has been torn apart by the protesters in that country. That night with Elton John performing earlier and then Queen/Adam was magical: link I am definitely not an Adam Lambert fan and think some of the videos of his live tours presented by AL fans on this forum are unfit for the human ear. I do however feel that he is a good fit for Queen projects and fans will be delighted by the total QAL product. This should be a successful tour.

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

What the hell?  How is a post on trolls the same as rules?  If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb).  None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did.  Neither of which is a rule.  Duh.  Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit. Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).

In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod. Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me. Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time

First of all these words:  'if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow', make no sense.  Second of all, I didn't write them. Here are the words from my post: 'If you decide to feed the trolls, you risk getting deleted or IP banned at the QZ mods' discretion.' Anyone with an IQ above 50 knows that 'a ban will follow' (your words) means something completely different from 'you risk getting deleted or IP banned' (my words).  and no one with an IQ above 50 could interpret my words as a rule. Here's another member's post voicing a similar opinion:: QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren't the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation.  This poster's opinion is that trolls should get a 'slap on the face/IP-Ban', and same goes for sport gear adverts.  Is this Member posting a rule?  No, it's clearly an opinion. Okay, so now you've misquoted one sentence from a post of mine that is clearly not a rule, but just an opinion in a members post - like every other opinion in every other member's post.  I'm still waiting for the lengthy list of rules you say I've posted.  You know, a list that looks something like this: 1. You may not... 2. You may... You know, actual rules, not your bizarre interpretation of what a rule is.

SweetCaroline wrote: The first time I saw Adam performing live was at the 2009 American Idol Summer Tour and then I saw him in his solo Glam Nation Tour 3 times in 2010. All I can say about it was that each time his charisma, stage presence and voice was electrifying and mesmerizing. I am anxiously waiting to see if I feel the same way about his live performances with Brian, Roger, Rufus, Spike and Neal in June and July! If I feel this way about Adam I can see what it must have been like for the people who were lucky enough to see the original Queen band performing live with the ultimate charismatic and mesmerizing frontman, Freddie Mercury!

SweetCaroline wrote: The first time I saw Adam performing live was at the 2009 American Idol Summer Tour and then I saw him in his solo Glam Nation Tour 3 times in 2010. All I can say about it was that each time his charisma, stage presence and voice was electrifying and mesmerizing. I am anxiously waiting to see if I feel the same way about his live performances with Brian, Roger, Rufus, Spike and Neal in June and July! If I feel this way about Adam I can see what it must have been like for the people who were lucky enough to see the original Queen band performing live with the ultimate charismatic and mesmerizing frontman, Freddie Mercury!

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

What the hell?  How is a post on trolls the same as rules?  If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb).  None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did.  Neither of which is a rule.  Duh.  Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit. Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).

In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod. Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me. Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time

First of all these words:  'if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow', make no sense.  Second of all, I didn't write them. Here are the words from my post: 'If you decide to feed the trolls, you risk getting deleted or IP banned at the QZ mods' discretion.' Anyone with an IQ above 50 knows that 'a ban will follow' (your words) means something completely different from 'you risk getting deleted or IP banned' (my words).  and no one with an IQ above 50 could interpret my words as a rule. Here's another member's post voicing a similar opinion:: QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren't the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation.  This poster's opinion is that trolls should get a 'slap on the face/IP-Ban', and same goes for sport gear adverts.  Is this Member posting a rule?  No, it's clearly an opinion. Okay, so now you've misquoted one sentence from a post of mine that is clearly not a rule, but just an opinion in a members post - like every other opinion in every other member's post.  I'm still waiting for the lengthy list of rules you say I've posted.  You know, a list that looks something like this: 1. You may not... 2. You may... You know, actual rules, not your bizarre interpretation of what a rule is.

Are Glamberts that sensitive that you had to lay all that out in that thread? Or is it just you and sweetcaroline? This here, and threatening legal action on QOL? You then turn around and say I'm cray/crazy. You just want total control, and some people booted...and I know full well you won't stop at anything to get it.

SweetCaroline wrote: Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

taptap wrote:

Black Velvet wrote:

(snipping irrelevant cray crap)If you both don't want others to post in this forum, you should add that to the lengthy rules you have set up here.(snipping irrelevant cray crap)

Post a link to this lengthy list of rules please, or else I call bullshit (which will fit in well with the rest of the irrelevant cray crap from your post that I clipped).  And remember, it's got to be my list, not the mods. I'll wait.

Forget it already?...here you go... http://www.queenconcerts.com/queenzone/1379657.html Enjoy the scent of bullshit. As your usual though you can't reply to all that is replied to you.

What the hell?  How is a post on trolls the same as rules?  If you'll look under several other sub-forums you will find at least three threads that contain exactly the same info and thoughts on trolls (at least one by Inu and one by Barb).  None of them are rules, not even Barb's, which basically says trolls are stupid, best not to feed them, just like my post did.  Neither of which is a rule.  Duh.  Unless you can c/p specific rules here, I say you're full of shit. Still waiting (I suspect it will be a loooong wait because duh I never posted a single rule on QZ, much less a lengthy list).

In your trolling thread, you posted if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow. I've read plenty of this board before deciding to post again. Never have I read Barb or Richard even coming close to posting that, let alone anyone else. So that is one of your bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. So very few posts under your belt, yet you think you know how to run this site. You aren't a mod. Cray/crazy/being happier...all that from someone who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission. That you think someone is here with no proof at all. That I was being blamed for a ban, which I said had nothing to do with me. Do take note though, I'm not having a go at the ones who will go to shows this summer. I hope everyone from the band itself to the fans have a great time

First of all these words:  'if anyone replied to a troll at Barb's and Richards discretion a ban will follow', make no sense.  Second of all, I didn't write them. Here are the words from my post: 'If you decide to feed the trolls, you risk getting deleted or IP banned at the QZ mods' discretion.' Anyone with an IQ above 50 knows that 'a ban will follow' (your words) means something completely different from 'you risk getting deleted or IP banned' (my words).  and no one with an IQ above 50 could interpret my words as a rule. Here's another member's post voicing a similar opinion:: QZ should become a better place these days. The "Glambert" fanatics aren't the only "problem"...weird people(requiring mental treatments),trolls(slap in the face/IP-Ban), advertisings for sports gear in a discussion board( IP-Ban) ! This site is in need of some more serious moderation.  This poster's opinion is that trolls should get a 'slap on the face/IP-Ban', and same goes for sport gear adverts.  Is this Member posting a rule?  No, it's clearly an opinion. Okay, so now you've misquoted one sentence from a post of mine that is clearly not a rule, but just an opinion in a members post - like every other opinion in every other member's post.  I'm still waiting for the lengthy list of rules you say I've posted.  You know, a list that looks something like this: 1. You may not... 2. You may... You know, actual rules, not your bizarre interpretation of what a rule is.

Are Glamberts that sensitive that you had to lay all that out in that thread? Or is it just you and sweetcaroline? This here, and threatening legal action on QOL? You then turn around and say I'm cray/crazy. You just want total control, and some people booted...and I know full well you won't stop at anything to get it.

I laid it all out to show that you're full of shit and willing to lie to make your unfounded accusations.  And now that I have, I'm done with you.

SweetCaroline wrote: Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!

FreddieCat wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!

That wasn't sweet, Caroline.

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!

That wasn't sweet, Caroline.

I know! It wasn't meant to be! Good play on words! I'm kind of sick of all the negative stuff! I'm a very positive person and even when things are dark, I try to look at the bright side.

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!

That wasn't sweet, Caroline.

I know! It wasn't meant to be! Good play on words! I'm kind of sick of all the negative stuff! I'm a very positive person and even when things are dark, I try to look at the bright side.

FreddieCat wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote:

FreddieCat wrote:

SweetCaroline wrote: Buzz off, Buzzkill! I wasn't talking to you!

That wasn't sweet, Caroline.

I know! It wasn't meant to be! Good play on words! I'm kind of sick of all the negative stuff! I'm a very positive person and even when things are dark, I try to look at the bright side.

Then why say the negative stuff? Just because another glambert is a gauche stupid person who insults queen fans on a queen forum doesn't mean you need be. Some examples for you of conversation topics addressing this thread: "I think the drumming section of the shows will be great with Adam and Rufus,especially if they do wonderful drum solos like they did at Keiv." "I will enjoy watching Adam and Brian postering against each other with Brian's Red Special raised up high" "I am a bit worried about the high demand of the tour schedule on their health" "Brian's "guitar faces" and AL's expressions in Vegas were awesome!" Note that the above comments pertain to the thread. Stay positive!!!