QueenZone discussion #1379495

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

YourValentine wrote: I'll ask Richard about renaming the forum. Just consider it to be the official QAL forum now :)

people on streets wrote:

YourValentine wrote: I'll ask Richard about renaming the forum. Just consider it to be the official QAL forum now :)

why renaming it? Creating another section would be better. Queen + PR is not the same as Queen + AL

SweetCaroline wrote:

people on streets wrote:

YourValentine wrote: I'll ask Richard about renaming the forum. Just consider it to be the official QAL forum now :)

why renaming it? Creating another section would be better. Queen + PR is not the same as Queen + AL

I agree. Queen + PR has a lot of threads under it going back to 2004. With so many Queen + AL venues (24 in the States and 3 in South Korea and Japan) coming up, it will be too confusing to post information about these concerts in the Queen + PR section.

FreddieCat wrote: So Good!! -So much Queen to learn, so little time. Enjoy every minute of it.

inu-liger wrote: My only other concern left otherwise regarding the AL fights: Will there be sanctions or a ban placed on rocknrolllover? If you read the topic I put over in the Personal section (you'll know which one it is), there is a lot of evidence regarding his hateful, homophobic trolling.

Black Velvet wrote:Inu ligers dedication, knowledge and collection is freaking amazing!

rocknrolllover wrote: Ban rocknrolllover? What obsession ? What is bad about homophobia? homophobia is a normal phenomenon. Take this as you took gays and lesbians with open arms.

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Ban rocknrolllover? What obsession ? What is bad about homophobia? homophobia is a normal phenomenon. Take this as you took gays and lesbians with open arms.

And you dear call yourself Wiseman on Queenonline.

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Ban rocknrolllover? What obsession ? What is bad about homophobia? homophobia is a normal phenomenon. Take this as you took gays and lesbians with open arms.

And you dear call yourself Wiseman on Queenonline.

inu-liger wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Ban rocknrolllover? What obsession ? What is bad about homophobia? homophobia is a normal phenomenon. Take this as you took gays and lesbians with open arms.

And you dear call yourself Wiseman on Queenonline.

And White Man too. What's QOL's policy on dupe accounts?

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Ban rocknrolllover? What obsession ? What is bad about homophobia? homophobia is a normal phenomenon. Take this as you took gays and lesbians with open arms.

And you dear call yourself Wiseman on Queenonline.

No. No no. I don't have these accounts there.

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Ban rocknrolllover? What obsession ? What is bad about homophobia? homophobia is a normal phenomenon. Take this as you took gays and lesbians with open arms.

And you dear call yourself Wiseman on Queenonline.

No. No no. I don't have these accounts there.

Once again, typical denial B.S. The writing style, as well as the occasional IDENTICAL posts that've appeared on both sites, points very clearly to you. The only difference? You behave better over there because you damn well know you would get banned in a heartbeat if you repeated your sick homophobic comments over there.

rocknrolllover wrote: I have right express my own point of view. Is there freedom of speech on this forum? I began suspect that there is no freedom of speech here.

matt z wrote: As long as It's not vile and hate filled I'm all for someone being able to express themselves. That said. ...i AM Kinda tired of this gay perspective thing being pushed down everybody's throat these past few years. Television, media etc. Feels like an entitlement now. Can't say anything critical without being called a homophobe However, nasty hate speech. (Haven't really seen it here) ought to be reprimanded. People discuss and have differences here. For instance. I'm not a fan of Lambert (even went as far as to download/listen to his music the other day. ... it was a waste of time so far) But I'm not going to call him a c! $ sucking p.o.s. There's a difference

pittrek wrote: link

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

Yes, but let's not use the forum to fight each other. This is going to be a great year for Queen once again and this time it will be with Adam Lambert. I really believe that better things will come out of acceptance of each other than useless fights and attacks like the ones this forum has been experiencing this past weeks. The thing is, for those who don't like Adam Lambert, it's not cool to keep hijacking all topics to say so, or even to make negative remarks towards Adam only to start a fight. There's a difference between stating an opinion or comparing his voice to a goat on a topic directed to or from Adam fans. Unless Adam fans are here to say that Freddie is shit - wich i haven't read it yet - , then i think it's OK for them to show how passionate they are about Adam Lambert, of course within reasonable measure - by this is mean, don't spam this forum with many Adam topics but keep posting under the same topic and discussing him and his music. It makes sense to discuss Adam and his music now that he's linked to Queen, but remember that this is still a Queen related forum. Let's move over and enjoy this great year of music, Remember Brian's health scare this past Dezember and appreciate the fact that he's still able to tour the world at least one more time. Life's too short for the kind of negativity and hate that goes around here in Queenzone. And by the way YourValentine, i can appreciate the "freedom of speech" that Richard wants for Queenzone but his no moderation policy is also responsible for many of the things that goes on in Queenzone. People have stated many times that some great posters simply don't post here anymore because of the attacks, and i can't blame them. Sometimes, a little moderation is needed, in every site. Little by little Queenzone has been improving a little over the last eight months, mainly because of the new tour announcements, new album and Roger's the lot. This will keep us motivated for this year, but Richard has to think about the future of Queenzone, because there is so much negativity and abuse people can take, or expose themelves to.

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

Yes, but let's not use the forum to fight each other. This is going to be a great year for Queen once again and this time it will be with Adam Lambert. I really believe that better things will come out of acceptance of each other than useless fights and attacks like the ones this forum has been experiencing this past weeks. The thing is, for those who don't like Adam Lambert, it's not cool to keep hijacking all topics to say so, or even to make negative remarks towards Adam only to start a fight. There's a difference between stating an opinion or comparing his voice to a goat on a topic directed to or from Adam fans. Unless Adam fans are here to say that Freddie is shit - wich i haven't read it yet - , then i think it's OK for them to show how passionate they are about Adam Lambert, of course within reasonable measure - by this is mean, don't spam this forum with many Adam topics but keep posting under the same topic and discussing him and his music. It makes sense to discuss Adam and his music now that he's linked to Queen, but remember that this is still a Queen related forum. Let's move over and enjoy this great year of music, Remember Brian's health scare this past Dezember and appreciate the fact that he's still able to tour the world at least one more time. Life's too short for the kind of negativity and hate that goes around here in Queenzone. And by the way YourValentine, i can appreciate the "freedom of speech" that Richard wants for Queenzone but his no moderation policy is also responsible for many of the things that goes on in Queenzone. People have stated many times that some great posters simply don't post here anymore because of the attacks, and i can't blame them. Sometimes, a little moderation is needed, in every site. Little by little Queenzone has been improving a little over the last eight months, mainly because of the new tour announcements, new album and Roger's the lot. This will keep us motivated for this year, but Richard has to think about the future of Queenzone, because there is so much negativity and abuse people can take, or expose themelves to.

rocknrolllover wrote:

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

Yes, but let's not use the forum to fight each other. This is going to be a great year for Queen once again and this time it will be with Adam Lambert. I really believe that better things will come out of acceptance of each other than useless fights and attacks like the ones this forum has been experiencing this past weeks. The thing is, for those who don't like Adam Lambert, it's not cool to keep hijacking all topics to say so, or even to make negative remarks towards Adam only to start a fight. There's a difference between stating an opinion or comparing his voice to a goat on a topic directed to or from Adam fans. Unless Adam fans are here to say that Freddie is shit - wich i haven't read it yet - , then i think it's OK for them to show how passionate they are about Adam Lambert, of course within reasonable measure - by this is mean, don't spam this forum with many Adam topics but keep posting under the same topic and discussing him and his music. It makes sense to discuss Adam and his music now that he's linked to Queen, but remember that this is still a Queen related forum. Let's move over and enjoy this great year of music, Remember Brian's health scare this past Dezember and appreciate the fact that he's still able to tour the world at least one more time. Life's too short for the kind of negativity and hate that goes around here in Queenzone. And by the way YourValentine, i can appreciate the "freedom of speech" that Richard wants for Queenzone but his no moderation policy is also responsible for many of the things that goes on in Queenzone. People have stated many times that some great posters simply don't post here anymore because of the attacks, and i can't blame them. Sometimes, a little moderation is needed, in every site. Little by little Queenzone has been improving a little over the last eight months, mainly because of the new tour announcements, new album and Roger's the lot. This will keep us motivated for this year, but Richard has to think about the future of Queenzone, because there is so much negativity and abuse people can take, or expose themelves to.

No future if there is no speech of freedom. No future if there you can't express your point of view so as you like despite on negative. No future if promise ban for those who wants express his point of view

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

Lostman wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Mr.QueenFan wrote:

YourValentine wrote: I am getting a lot of complaints about hijacking of the forum with mindless topics about AL and homophobic and hateful posts. I suggest that all AL threads go into the Queen + Paul Rodgers forum, it is not being used anymore and people can fight there as they wish. Please keep the serious forum for serious Queen topics, thanks.

Yes, but let's not use the forum to fight each other. This is going to be a great year for Queen once again and this time it will be with Adam Lambert. I really believe that better things will come out of acceptance of each other than useless fights and attacks like the ones this forum has been experiencing this past weeks. The thing is, for those who don't like Adam Lambert, it's not cool to keep hijacking all topics to say so, or even to make negative remarks towards Adam only to start a fight. There's a difference between stating an opinion or comparing his voice to a goat on a topic directed to or from Adam fans. Unless Adam fans are here to say that Freddie is shit - wich i haven't read it yet - , then i think it's OK for them to show how passionate they are about Adam Lambert, of course within reasonable measure - by this is mean, don't spam this forum with many Adam topics but keep posting under the same topic and discussing him and his music. It makes sense to discuss Adam and his music now that he's linked to Queen, but remember that this is still a Queen related forum. Let's move over and enjoy this great year of music, Remember Brian's health scare this past Dezember and appreciate the fact that he's still able to tour the world at least one more time. Life's too short for the kind of negativity and hate that goes around here in Queenzone. And by the way YourValentine, i can appreciate the "freedom of speech" that Richard wants for Queenzone but his no moderation policy is also responsible for many of the things that goes on in Queenzone. People have stated many times that some great posters simply don't post here anymore because of the attacks, and i can't blame them. Sometimes, a little moderation is needed, in every site. Little by little Queenzone has been improving a little over the last eight months, mainly because of the new tour announcements, new album and Roger's the lot. This will keep us motivated for this year, but Richard has to think about the future of Queenzone, because there is so much negativity and abuse people can take, or expose themelves to.

No future if there is no speech of freedom. No future if there you can't express your point of view so as you like despite on negative. No future if promise ban for those who wants express his point of view

Lostman wrote: Huh?

taptap wrote:

Lostman wrote: Huh?

It's a quote from the movie 'The Teriminator'.  John Connor from the future sends the message back to his mother and younger self via the Arnold S. terminator.

Lostman wrote:

taptap wrote:

Lostman wrote: Huh?

It's a quote from the movie 'The Teriminator'.  John Connor from the future sends the message back to his mother and younger self via the Arnold S. terminator.

You're pretty much amusing.

matt z wrote:And for someone purporting to be a queen fan to post that AIDS death wish is beyond ignorant especially considering how Freddie finally succumbed to the syndrome

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

rocknrollover, if you are so against AL why don't you express your opinions direct to Brian May directly via his letters page on his website or to Jim Beach at Queen productions. I'd be interested in their response

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

matt z wrote: Good point anagramer. I found it. Yeah that's pretty much the threshold of hate speech. I'm still waiting for Adam Lambert to fight in this forum. The title is misleading. And for someone purporting to be a queen fan to post that AIDS death wish is beyond ignorant especially considering how Freddie finally succumbed to the syndrome

rocknrolllover wrote:

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

rocknrollover, if you are so against AL why don't you express your opinions direct to Brian May directly via his letters page on his website or to Jim Beach at Queen productions. I'd be interested in their response

What sense I must do this What sense in this? It looks like talk with the walls! They don't care on ours opinion. They don't care that we want box set Queen, gigs of 70's. Their view on this "What sense release gigs of 70's, box set if better hundred times re-release Wembley and so on. They don't care. They don't care on old fan base .

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

rocknrollover, if you are so against AL why don't you express your opinions direct to Brian May directly via his letters page on his website or to Jim Beach at Queen productions. I'd be interested in their response

What sense I must do this What sense in this? It looks like talk with the walls! They don't care on ours opinion. They don't care that we want box set Queen, gigs of 70's. Their view on this "What sense release gigs of 70's, box set if better hundred times re-release Wembley and so on. They don't care. They don't care on old fan base .

No, let's be specific about this Nobody on here cares what YOU want, and, come to think of it, I don't think anybody on here cares about your opinions which are of no consequence whatsoever As is posted earlier, write directly to Dr May or Jim Beach. I'm sure they'll give you the reply you most thoroughly deserve - a resounding silence

FreddieCat wrote:

matt z wrote: Good point anagramer. I found it. Yeah that's pretty much the threshold of hate speech. I'm still waiting for Adam Lambert to fight in this forum. The title is misleading. And for someone purporting to be a queen fan to post that AIDS death wish is beyond ignorant especially considering how Freddie finally succumbed to the syndrome

Adam Lambert would NEVER fight on this forum or any forum anywhere. He is a true gentleman who is genuinely humbled and pleased to be working with Queen. (Some of) his fans, however have come to QZ to proseletize and spread the ugly holy gospel of Adam Lambert. This is a completely different animal and obviously foreign to Mr. Lambert's mission, which is to collaborate with Brian and Roger and lend the needed vocals with a little sprinkle of very attractive theater. I see Mr. Lambert as one who is INTERESTED in Queen, and no doubt wanting and expecting his fans to LEARN about Queen history and trivia in order to have meaningful mutual educationally enriched conversations. Glamberts, let the learning begin. You had a good start with the two videos of AL's Somebody To Love performance for comparison. AL did a great job in one performance but not so great in the other. Why? How did the second good performance compare to Freddie's, Paul Rodgers and others? See where I am going? SO much to discuss if you will kindly drop the Holy Glambert prosletizing and do what Adam would really want-listen and learn. Together with QOL, this is the place!!

rocknrolllover wrote:

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

rocknrollover, if you are so against AL why don't you express your opinions direct to Brian May directly via his letters page on his website or to Jim Beach at Queen productions. I'd be interested in their response

What sense I must do this What sense in this? It looks like talk with the walls! They don't care on ours opinion. They don't care that we want box set Queen, gigs of 70's. Their view on this "What sense release gigs of 70's, box set if better hundred times re-release Wembley and so on. They don't care. They don't care on old fan base .

No, let's be specific about this Nobody on here cares what YOU want, and, come to think of it, I don't think anybody on here cares about your opinions which are of no consequence whatsoever As is posted earlier, write directly to Dr May or Jim Beach. I'm sure they'll give you the reply you most thoroughly deserve - a resounding silence

except as banal nothing unsupported hate I can not explain if queenzoners are not interested in what I think, then I am not interested in what you think and I think that's not interesting to others

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

rocknrollover, if you are so against AL why don't you express your opinions direct to Brian May directly via his letters page on his website or to Jim Beach at Queen productions. I'd be interested in their response

What sense I must do this What sense in this? It looks like talk with the walls! They don't care on ours opinion. They don't care that we want box set Queen, gigs of 70's. Their view on this "What sense release gigs of 70's, box set if better hundred times re-release Wembley and so on. They don't care. They don't care on old fan base .

No, let's be specific about this Nobody on here cares what YOU want, and, come to think of it, I don't think anybody on here cares about your opinions which are of no consequence whatsoever As is posted earlier, write directly to Dr May or Jim Beach. I'm sure they'll give you the reply you most thoroughly deserve - a resounding silence

except as banal nothing unsupported hate I can not explain if queenzoners are not interested in what I think, then I am not interested in what you think and I think that's not interesting to others

Oh, I've had enough of this, just fuck off

ANAGRAMER wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Any long time QZ member who doesn't recognize what rocknrollover is (a moron) and what he craves (rebuttals to his imbecilic posts) is as much of a moron as he is.

Wrong opinion.

rocknrollover, if you are so against AL why don't you express your opinions direct to Brian May directly via his letters page on his website or to Jim Beach at Queen productions. I'd be interested in their response

Lostman wrote: The topic which was created with the sole purpose to stop all the AL related fights has itself turned into one massive fight. Oh, the irony.

YourValentine wrote: Every second year or so I have to explain the non-censorship policy of Queenzone. It is NOT my responsibility if people post all this crap on forums, facebook and elsewhere. I am only responsible for my own posts like any other user. If everybody would feel this responsibility we would not have a problem. Moderation will always be limited to deleting spam and illegal posts. It would not help the least bit if Richard or I would start deleting offensive post or ban users who say stupid things. Just take a look at the fan club facebook site - they have admins but the page is swamped with idiots who make it hard for normal users to participate. If people would only just ignore the idiots life on the internet would be so much easier. Just do not feed the trolls. A troll who never gets an answer to his offensive stuff won't continue. Most of all: do not spread the stupidity over the forums by quoting the offensive stuff into other threads. In my opinion it is the only way. I do not want to spend my time warning people and deleting posts and then get angry responses because I delete idiot A but not idiot B and because I deleted post C but not post D. I see this happen on QOL or the fan club member page and I think it will never work out well. I am not impressed if people ask for a ban, on the contrary, it will even prevent me from deleting users because I would not want to be used for personal vendettas. I am also immune against "pressure" - I am a volunteer and the only person who can make me do something is the website owner.

YourValentine wrote: Every second year or so I have to explain the non-censorship policy of Queenzone. It is NOT my responsibility if people post all this crap on forums, facebook and elsewhere. I am only responsible for my own posts like any other user. If everybody would feel this responsibility we would not have a problem. Moderation will always be limited to deleting spam and illegal posts. It would not help the least bit if Richard or I would start deleting offensive post or ban users who say stupid things. Just take a look at the fan club facebook site - they have admins but the page is swamped with idiots who make it hard for normal users to participate. If people would only just ignore the idiots life on the internet would be so much easier. Just do not feed the trolls. A troll who never gets an answer to his offensive stuff won't continue. Most of all: do not spread the stupidity over the forums by quoting the offensive stuff into other threads. In my opinion it is the only way. I do not want to spend my time warning people and deleting posts and then get angry responses because I delete idiot A but not idiot B and because I deleted post C but not post D. I see this happen on QOL or the fan club member page and I think it will never work out well. I am not impressed if people ask for a ban, on the contrary, it will even prevent me from deleting users because I would not want to be used for personal vendettas. I am also immune against "pressure" - I am a volunteer and the only person who can make me do something is the website owner.

Panchgani wrote:

YourValentine wrote: Every second year or so I have to explain the non-censorship policy of Queenzone. It is NOT my responsibility if people post all this crap on forums, facebook and elsewhere. I am only responsible for my own posts like any other user. If everybody would feel this responsibility we would not have a problem. Moderation will always be limited to deleting spam and illegal posts. It would not help the least bit if Richard or I would start deleting offensive post or ban users who say stupid things. Just take a look at the fan club facebook site - they have admins but the page is swamped with idiots who make it hard for normal users to participate. If people would only just ignore the idiots life on the internet would be so much easier. Just do not feed the trolls. A troll who never gets an answer to his offensive stuff won't continue. Most of all: do not spread the stupidity over the forums by quoting the offensive stuff into other threads. In my opinion it is the only way. I do not want to spend my time warning people and deleting posts and then get angry responses because I delete idiot A but not idiot B and because I deleted post C but not post D. I see this happen on QOL or the fan club member page and I think it will never work out well. I am not impressed if people ask for a ban, on the contrary, it will even prevent me from deleting users because I would not want to be used for personal vendettas. I am also immune against "pressure" - I am a volunteer and the only person who can make me do something is the website owner.

Thanks Barb. The problem is too many people on this forum get perverse enjoyment out of responding to "trolls".

Zebonka12 wrote: Forums are like toilets, though. You can say 'well people should just use the toilet properly and not smear crap everywhere', but once in a while it happens - and then what? We don't have the tools to clean that shit up, as ordinary users. The tactic of 'just ignore them' becomes moot when these fucking Lambertards are posting links to his shit videos left, right and centre. That being said, I basically support the notion of having a hands-off philosophy with regards to moderating the forum with most of the content. Repetitive spam is akin to turd on the flusher, though, and it hurts no one to have it removed.

Zebonka12 wrote: Forums are like toilets, though. You can say 'well people should just use the toilet properly and not smear crap everywhere', but once in a while it happens - and then what? We don't have the tools to clean that shit up, as ordinary users. The tactic of 'just ignore them' becomes moot when these fucking Lambertards are posting links to his shit videos left, right and centre. That being said, I basically support the notion of having a hands-off philosophy with regards to moderating the forum with most of the content. Repetitive spam is akin to turd on the flusher, though, and it hurts no one to have it removed.

taptap wrote:

Zebonka12 wrote: Forums are like toilets, though. You can say 'well people should just use the toilet properly and not smear crap everywhere', but once in a while it happens - and then what? We don't have the tools to clean that shit up, as ordinary users. The tactic of 'just ignore them' becomes moot when these fucking Lambertards are posting links to his shit videos left, right and centre. That being said, I basically support the notion of having a hands-off philosophy with regards to moderating the forum with most of the content. Repetitive spam is akin to turd on the flusher, though, and it hurts no one to have it removed.

I'm sorry, but to stay with your theme, this is a crock of shit. Ever since YV asked that the QAL and Adam talk be moved to another sub-forum, no one but a few regulars like you, rocknrolllover and a handful of others have mentioned Lambert here. How can one sub-forum affect the Queen forum? It's easy enough to ignore the handful of threads over there, but no, you obviously can't. I have to assume the reason is that you don't want to. That's fine with me - it's your choice. But to blame fans of the Queen + projects for your own issues with it is not exactly the height of empirical logic. It is, however, a fine example of shit-slinging. And now I will take Barb's excellent advice,ignore the shit, and carry on enjoying what's not..

rocknrolllover wrote: And I am not like to like the lameberts like to unlike rather much I did not like to his gay likeness. Like. His is like dog crap with whistling yards of darkness in the appearance of man.

matt z wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: And I am not like to like the lameberts like to unlike rather much I did not like to his gay likeness. Like. His is like dog crap with whistling yards of darkness in the appearance of man.

What the hell....? I've gotta say. This addition of Adam Lambert has led to a ton of hostility on this site

matt z wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: And I am not like to like the lameberts like to unlike rather much I did not like to his gay likeness. Like. His is like dog crap with whistling yards of darkness in the appearance of man.

What the hell....? I've gotta say. This addition of Adam Lambert has led to a ton of hostility on this site

Fireplace wrote:

matt z wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: And I am not like to like the lameberts like to unlike rather much I did not like to his gay likeness. Like. His is like dog crap with whistling yards of darkness in the appearance of man.

What the hell....? I've gotta say. This addition of Adam Lambert has led to a ton of hostility on this site

You sound confused Matt. Perhaps a touch of the old whistling yards of darkness in the appearance of man?

YourValentine wrote: Every second year or so I have to explain the non-censorship policy of Queenzone. It is NOT my responsibility if people post all this crap on forums, facebook and elsewhere. I am only responsible for my own posts like any other user. If everybody would feel this responsibility we would not have a problem. Moderation will always be limited to deleting spam and illegal posts. It would not help the least bit if Richard or I would start deleting offensive post or ban users who say stupid things. Just take a look at the fan club facebook site - they have admins but the page is swamped with idiots who make it hard for normal users to participate. If people would only just ignore the idiots life on the internet would be so much easier. Just do not feed the trolls. A troll who never gets an answer to his offensive stuff won't continue. Most of all: do not spread the stupidity over the forums by quoting the offensive stuff into other threads. In my opinion it is the only way. I do not want to spend my time warning people and deleting posts and then get angry responses because I delete idiot A but not idiot B and because I deleted post C but not post D. I see this happen on QOL or the fan club member page and I think it will never work out well. I am not impressed if people ask for a ban, on the contrary, it will even prevent me from deleting users because I would not want to be used for personal vendettas. I am also immune against "pressure" - I am a volunteer and the only person who can make me do something is the website owner.

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: Hello Mother Fuckers Well if you didn't think that Queen is mostly my intellectual property then check this out, if you have the security permissions to do so: link Chow for now Graham

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: Hello Mother Fuckers

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: WHO THE FUCK ACTUALLY WANTS TO ADMIT THEY CAN ACCESS THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE: link

WHO THE FUCK WANTS TO ADMIT THEY KNOW ABOUT THIS, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU IN THE REAL WORLD? GRAHAM

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: What the fuck is going on is my basic question!

I have lawyers who are prepared to sue Adam Lambert once he has finished his tour with Queen in the USA for as much as £100 Million GBP for the tour of the USA

inu-liger wrote:

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: What the fuck is going on is my basic question!

Basic answer: A troll who is either on hard drugs, mentally ill, or both.

dragonfly.trumpeter need is help. Bring back him to mental hospital.

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: [...] when I know with absolute certainty that I am genetically identical to the agent who was Freddie Mercury [...]

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: [...] when I know with absolute certainty that I am genetically identical to the agent who was Freddie Mercury [...]

This is so f***ing crazy that it's not even funny anymore!

rocknrolllover wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: [...] when I know with absolute certainty that I am genetically identical to the agent who was Freddie Mercury [...]

This is so f***ing crazy that it's not even funny anymore!

Well as I said and repeat again, this Medusa. Medusa-dragonfly.trumpeter= one user.

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: [...] when I know with absolute certainty that I am genetically identical to the agent who was Freddie Mercury [...]

This is so f***ing crazy that it's not even funny anymore!

Well as I said and repeat again, this Medusa. Medusa-dragonfly.trumpeter= one user.

And you know this, how exactly? Hmmmmmmmmm.

Stick wrote: Whenever a new insane dude shows up around here RNR is one of the first to comment. The pot calling the kettle black seems to be one of his life goals besides acting the trolling retard

rocknrolllover wrote: You're wrong as always.

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: You're wrong as always.

Hey a perfect English sentence! Who'd have thought it was possible. Well, most people because everyone sees right through you. Faking it requires a bit more concentration or you might drop the ball some more in the future like you did in the past. You incredible idiot.

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

What's next? Stamp your feet and hold your breath? Want a lollipop?

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

What's next? Stamp your feet and hold your breath? Want a lollipop?

Want new Queen album. I'm awaiting cancel concerts with Lambert. I want Live at The Rainbow DVD+2CD.

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

What's next? Stamp your feet and hold your breath? Want a lollipop?

Want new Queen album. I'm awaiting cancel concerts with Lambert. I want Live at The Rainbow DVD+2CD.

Hahahaha god you're an idiot.

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

What's next? Stamp your feet and hold your breath? Want a lollipop?

Want new Queen album. I'm awaiting cancel concerts with Lambert. I want Live at The Rainbow DVD+2CD.

Hahahaha god you're an idiot.

No I am not an idiot which cannot be said about you

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

What's next? Stamp your feet and hold your breath? Want a lollipop?

Want new Queen album. I'm awaiting cancel concerts with Lambert. I want Live at The Rainbow DVD+2CD.

Hahahaha god you're an idiot.

No I am not an idiot which cannot be said about you

Wanting to make a 2CD out of a show that was about an hour long doesn't help further your point.

Stick wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

Stick wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: No I am not an idiot

What's next? Stamp your feet and hold your breath? Want a lollipop?

Want new Queen album. I'm awaiting cancel concerts with Lambert. I want Live at The Rainbow DVD+2CD.

Hahahaha god you're an idiot.

No I am not an idiot which cannot be said about you

Wanting to make a 2CD out of a show that was about an hour long doesn't help further your point.

It does help prove mine.

The Real Wizard wrote: Ahhh, so young and fiery. Soon enough you'll stop feeding the trolls. But it is fun for a little while.. Thank you for having a functioning brain. Enjoy !

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: Well I really am Graham David Bruton (DOB 27/08/1980).

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: The whole thing about Medusa or whatever this is, is FUCKING BULLSHIT. How many of you chirpy monkeys really can view me singing I want it all? You are like a bunch of ethiopian Goriillas in a cave fighting over a bunch of bananas when I am your predator. Hur Hur Hur Hello Graham

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Inu: stop this discussion RIGHT NOW.

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: Queenfansunite Thanks for a positive comment at last! You can watch "Elton John" singing Candle in the Wind at Princes Diana's funeral and that is in actual fact the agent who also played Freddie Mercury and others playing the piano and singing. This saves me the trouble of making a new recording. Graham David Bruton

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: My private view on this is that I gave everyone all possible opportunities in relation to me being a clone: 1) I informed Brian May that I was prepared to headline Glastonbury as the new singer of Queen for 2013. 2) I have offered Brian May the opportunity to meet with me on more than 10 occasions. 3) I attended Wildlife Rocks in Guildford in 2012, where some agent who pretends to be Brian May actually tells me I am correct in that I am a clone of Freddie Mercury but he is unable to help me at that time. 4) Laywers at DMH Stallard LLP confirmed that I am correct in that I am a cloned human in December 2011. Due to the lack of responses or any support, I am now closing the opportunity for anyone to work for me in the music industry so no one will ever now benefit from me as a cloned human with a special education and musical ability/performance ability in the future. I have a decent career in Financial Services. Why the fuck should I offer my skills to the music industry ever again even though I am trained to offer a better service to the music industry than anyone else can ever offer? Graham David Bruton

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: I think the idea which springs out of Who Wants To Live Forever, in relation to the question "who can sing the highest note" is the kind of debate a spastic would dream up. So are we saying then that if a male Ethiopian with an IQ of 55 can sing a higher note than Adam Lambert, then suddenly the Ethiopian is the "winner" amongst Queen fans, and even Rupert Murdoch and the nominee ownership structure then falls on an Ethiopian with an IQ of 55 (matching Adam Lambert or above his tone). Does this mean then that the control of the media then falls on a male Ethiopian with an IQ of 55 just because he can sing the highest note which Adam Lambert can sing or higher!! I can tell you that the Who does want to live forever, and this is why my old man is Pete Townshend. He will live to 150+, which is why if Brian cannot pull his finger out, my old man is up for it along with my old chum Zak Starkey and others from The Who. I might even me able to get John Lennon out of retirement if needs be. Graham

dragonfly.trumpeter wrote: To tell you the truth Queen probably had to pull out of playing with Adam Lambert at Knebworth because it is not in public policy for Adam Lambert to be in Queen (particularly in front of probably the UK's most misinformed people, whilst this chap headlines an event, telling everyone it is great to be gay and have daft earrings making those people following him unemployable). The King of Rhye, my face is more like a 1966 Action Man (without the scar on the cheek but with black hair and blue eyes). A human skull is a human skull and with a bit of prosthetic make up I can be anyone I like. In addition cameras coupled with technology can make someone look like they have rabbits ears or the teeth of a gorilla anyway - why don't you check out Skype! Graham

dragonfly.trumpeter3 wrote: inu-liger You have pissed off the most prominent person in the world, and even in the United Kingdom, anyone who can make a decision regarding me knows the truth so you can only ever be a candidate for the death penalty. You seem to have extreme confidence, but when I skin your children alive and turn them into a stage jacket for my next tour with Queen then you will realise why your children died, and this is probably for a better cause than anything else, i.e. whatever your children could have become, if they die now and become an item of my clothing this will be more useful. I believe that all you have is a goodbye ma, and in nightmares not a kiss. You now realize that you are the worlds most stupid person. Graham David Bruton

dragonfly.trumpeter3 wrote: inu-liger You have pissed off the most prominent person in the world, and even in the United Kingdom, anyone who can make a decision regarding me knows the truth so you can only ever be a candidate for the death penalty. You seem to have extreme confidence, but when I skin your children alive and turn them into a stage jacket for my next tour with Queen then you will realise why your children died, and this is probably for a better cause than anything else, i.e. whatever your children could have become, if they die now and become an item of my clothing this will be more useful. I believe that all you have is a goodbye ma, and in nightmares not a kiss. You now realize that you are the worlds most stupid person. Graham David Bruton

inu-liger wrote: Quit it with the mockery, you asshole

terrorist wrote: I get a funny feeling inu-liger may be something to do with Adam Lambert. If this is the case then inu-liger already owes Freddie Mercury's estate at least £50,000,000 GBP. I am contacting various lawyers at the moment to put this matter to rest. In my view Adam Lambert already owes me £50M GBP++, and if he completes the tour with Queen this strict legal liability is likely to rise to £150M GBP+++. If Adam Lambert is unable to pay this strict liability over my estate then I will expect Brian May and Roger Taylor to finance the difference or else I will look at the transaction related to Paul Rodgers etc etc. Graham

rocknrolllover wrote:

terrorist wrote: I get a funny feeling inu-liger may be something to do with Adam Lambert. If this is the case then inu-liger already owes Freddie Mercury's estate at least £50,000,000 GBP. I am contacting various lawyers at the moment to put this matter to rest. In my view Adam Lambert already owes me £50M GBP++, and if he completes the tour with Queen this strict legal liability is likely to rise to £150M GBP+++. If Adam Lambert is unable to pay this strict liability over my estate then I will expect Brian May and Roger Taylor to finance the difference or else I will look at the transaction related to Paul Rodgers etc etc. Graham

Oh shit! Please remove yourself from here.

terrorist wrote: I get a funny feeling inu-liger may be something to do with Adam Lambert. If this is the case then inu-liger already owes Freddie Mercury's estate at least £50,000,000 GBP. I am contacting various lawyers at the moment to put this matter to rest. In my view Adam Lambert already owes me £50M GBP++, and if he completes the tour with Queen this strict legal liability is likely to rise to £150M GBP+++. If Adam Lambert is unable to pay this strict liability over my estate then I will expect Brian May and Roger Taylor to finance the difference or else I will look at the transaction related to Paul Rodgers etc etc. Graham