inu-liger 01.04.2014 01:01 |
Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymore |
The King Of Rhye 01.04.2014 01:11 |
I dont know quite what to say............I think halfway between a and b.........I would rate them much worse if I didnt just think......like I DO...........that the guy is a HELL of a good singer......... |
The King Of Rhye 01.04.2014 01:13 |
Not that I am accusing you of this for ONE second, Inu, but the one thing that really really ticked me off about the Adam backlash was the people sayin stuff like..........ooh a gay flamboyant guy singing for Queen..........we cant have that.......... |
rocknrolllover 01.04.2014 01:27 |
Stupid poll again. |
Chief Mouse 01.04.2014 01:35 |
I'd say obnoxious. I don't mind them here but I think a Queen forum shouldn't be flooded with AL topics and videos. There surely are Adam Lambert forums for that. On the other hand, someone should quit expressing his daily hatred and homophobia towards AL. I find that just as obnoxious. Yes Anton, I'm talking about you. Your ass should leave this place. |
rocknrolllover 01.04.2014 01:53 |
Chief Mouse wrote: I'd say obnoxious. I don't mind them here but I think a Queen forum shouldn't be flooded with AL topics and videos. There surely are Adam Lambert forums for that. On the other hand, someone should quit expressing his daily hatred and homophobia towards AL. I find that just as obnoxious. Yes Anton, I'm talking about you. Your ass should leave this place.Lol!! |
The King Of Rhye 01.04.2014 02:05 |
hey btw rocknrolllover.............for the longest time I thought your name was Rock N Roll OVER...........like the Kiss album////////////// |
rocknrolllover 01.04.2014 02:09 |
The King Of Rhye wrote: hey btw rocknrolllover.............for the longest time I thought your name was Rock N Roll OVER...........like the Kiss album//////////////Not funny, not clever. |
thomasquinn 32989 01.04.2014 06:06 |
I'd say "all of the above". And yes, that also includes A. |
Hangman_96 01.04.2014 07:21 |
Everything apart from A. |
Saint Jiub 01.04.2014 09:54 |
I pick "A" - No worse than the average Queen fan, but I could have picked B or C, as A, B and C are equivalent. |
Stick 01.04.2014 10:58 |
Double D. |
taptap 01.04.2014 13:32 |
inu-liger wrote: Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymore Every person who chimed in about the first poll, and said they voted twice, also added they voted 'trolls'. The nutbags are coming from inside the house, but they don't look like Glamberts. iow, physician heal thyself. |
Iron Butterfly 01.04.2014 13:42 |
taptap wrote:I voted obnoxious on the first thread. I'm standing by that more than ever now as well as D. That is based on CNB's and your antics/butthurt/judgements/speaking as a wannabe spokesperson for AL and the other Glamberts btw. Thank goodness I do know for a fact not every Glambert feels the way you both do.inu-liger wrote: Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymoreEvery person who chimed in about the first poll, and said they voted twice, also added they voted 'trolls'. The nutbags are coming from inside the house, but they don't look like Glamberts. iow, physician heal thyself. |
YAFF 01.04.2014 14:20 |
inu-liger wrote: Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymoreb, |
matt z 01.04.2014 17:08 |
Who the heck is tap tap? Why come to assumptions that ppl in here are making it a mess when clearly it was the result of multiple posts (the hostile thread nowruns 12+ pages) I vote b, c, d.... as option A is unfounded based upon this easily realized principle: Queen are an institution; they were an incredible, remarkable band that reached incredible heights on record and in performance. Each member in the band has been the writer of at least one top ten hit. They continue to be popular and are massively influential. Lambert A mildly successful pop star who's music is dreadfully clichéd. However, likely to be adopted fully by the gay community as a bastion despite flawed reasoning. He possess an incredibly wide vocal range, which is the only plus The result being that Queen fans ' admiration is well founded. Adams is not. It is the screaming voice of a teen idol fanship. To have suggested that Queen fans on a QUEEN FAN FORUM have been as glaringly superficial is absurd |
Iron Butterfly 01.04.2014 17:14 |
matt z wrote: Who the heck is tap tap? Why come to assumptions that ppl in here are making it a mess when clearly it was the result of multiple posts (the hostile thread nowruns 12+ pages) I vote b, c, d.... as option A is unfounded based upon this easily realized principle: Queen are an institution; they were an incredible, remarkable band that reached incredible heights on record and in performance. Each member in the band has been the writer of at least one top ten hit. They continue to be popular and are massively influential. Lambert A mildly successful pop star who's music is dreadfully clichéd. However, likely to be adopted fully by the gay community as a bastion despite flawed reasoning. He possess an incredibly wide vocal range, which is the only plusTaptap was known as mithril on QOL. The very one who threatened to forward my posts on to a legal commission because I had the gall not to agree with her on all things AL. And very well said in the rest of your post. Range isn't everything. |
inu-liger 01.04.2014 18:24 |
That's one thing I find hasn't been discussed at length yet, that threat about the "legal commission." Didn't you say that this commission was supposedly based in the UK? I'd love to see a screencap of the actual threat if it still exists, even as an archived message. |
Iron Butterfly 01.04.2014 18:55 |
inu-liger wrote: That's one thing I find hasn't been discussed at length yet, that threat about the "legal commission." Didn't you say that this commission was supposedly based in the UK? I'd love to see a screencap of the actual threat if it still exists, even as an archived message.It doesn't exist as it was deleted as well as the entire thread it was in. And not only that, she wanted more Glamberts to email her about me if they felt the same. I know before that she mentioned copying/keeping my posts. It was ugly, then they wondered why the thread was then locked and then deleted. Yup, she said the commission(some sort of internet commission) was in the UK, as that is where QOL is hosted. I don't know what ever came of that, here but I do know this, and hopefully the people that know me do know this... I've never posted anything close that warranted such a threat. Maybe more bitchin about me behind that because I talk with milkman. |
FreddieCat 01.04.2014 20:14 |
I would add an item e. Lock all threads related to AL, start a new thread only with the understanding that it remains open if arguing does not happen. I think JPL does this on QOL and Prince.org will occasionally lock a thread. But of the above, all but item a, even though QZ fans get wild and crazy sometimes. |
YAFF 01.04.2014 20:23 |
taptap wrote:What does it mean to look like a Glambert other than having your head up your ass?inu-liger wrote: Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymoreEvery person who chimed in about the first poll, and said they voted twice, also added they voted 'trolls'. The nutbags are coming from inside the house, but they don't look like Glamberts. iow, physician heal thyself. Are you still here? Scarcely anyone enjoys your Lamgoat spam...guess that makes you a troll |
Iron Butterfly 01.04.2014 20:49 |
FreddieCat wrote: I would add an item e. Lock all threads related to AL, start a new thread only with the understanding that it remains open if arguing does not happen. I think JPL does this on QOL and Prince.org will occasionally lock a thread. But of the above, all but item a, even though QZ fans get wild and crazy sometimes.Lock threads on QZ?! I wouldn't be for that for many reasons. Free speech, and likely if threads would end up locked, I'd be the one blamed for that. JLP has locked very few threads that I can see. It's something he doesn't do easily. |
inu-liger 01.04.2014 21:09 |
FreddieCat wrote:I would add an item e. Lock all threads related to AL, start a new thread only with the understanding that it remains open if arguing does not happen. I think JPL does this on QOL and Prince.org will occasionally lock a thread. But of the above, all but item a, even though QZ fans get wild and crazy sometimes.No disrespect, but I don't think Barb has the time to be constantly checking the website just to keep a JLP style on any specific topics. |
FreddieCat 02.04.2014 10:31 |
I agree with both of you. Locking is not really practical and really isn't done often. And yes, seemingly any actions on the part of the mod would start the blame game. But a dilemma. These particular Glam'spirts demonstrate the ugly side of anarchy. I do very much like the wildness of QZ although I had to toughen up to be here, but don't like to see crazy ugly shit flying from these folks. This Amazon stuff is beyond wild. Didn't even know they had discussion forums, thought they only sold stuff. I am currently very much enjoying some of the threads here, favorite now is the Night At The Opera, and several very good ones on QOL. Hopefully we can get beyond the Glamslam kooks who have yet to show appreciation for any Queen trivia and history. What to do,I dunno. |
taptap 02.04.2014 12:07 |
YAFF wrote:taptap wrote:What does it mean to look like a Glambert other than having your head up your ass? Are you still here? Scarcely anyone enjoys your Lamgoat spam...guess that makes you a trollinu-liger wrote: Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymoreEvery person who chimed in about the first poll, and said they voted twice, also added they voted 'trolls'. The nutbags are coming from inside the house, but they don't look like Glamberts. iow, physician heal thyself. I don't care what anonymous trolls on the internet think. Your laughable insults are entertaining, but in my case not effective. So carry on being a horse's ass - every stage production has its fools for comic relief. |
Iron Butterfly 02.04.2014 12:38 |
taptap wrote:You don't care? Then why such anger/judgements from you just before you left QOL?YAFF wrote:I don't care what anonymous trolls on the internet think. Your laughable insults are entertaining, but in my case not effective. So carry on being a horse's ass - every stage production has its fools for comic relief.taptap wrote:What does it mean to look like a Glambert other than having your head up your ass? Are you still here? Scarcely anyone enjoys your Lamgoat spam...guess that makes you a trollinu-liger wrote: Alrighty, since obviously the first attempt at this poll was clearly compromised and abused by the AL nutbags who hijacked the results thanks to poor forum coding, I decided to have another go at this poll with a different idea: Manually responding with your pick from the choices below, which I've modified a bit, to make it much harder to screw with the results anonymously. So once again, your take on the AL fans. Are they: a. No worse than the average Queen fan b. Obnoxious c. Trolls d. Not wanted here anymoreEvery person who chimed in about the first poll, and said they voted twice, also added they voted 'trolls'. The nutbags are coming from inside the house, but they don't look like Glamberts. iow, physician heal thyself. |
Iron Butterfly 02.04.2014 16:05 |
FreddieCat wrote: I agree with both of you. Locking is not really practical and really isn't done often. And yes, seemingly any actions on the part of the mod would start the blame game. But a dilemma. These particular Glam'spirts demonstrate the ugly side of anarchy. I do very much like the wildness of QZ although I had to toughen up to be here, but don't like to see crazy ugly shit flying from these folks. This Amazon stuff is beyond wild. Didn't even know they had discussion forums, thought they only sold stuff. I am currently very much enjoying some of the threads here, favorite now is the Night At The Opera, and several very good ones on QOL. Hopefully we can get beyond the Glamslam kooks who have yet to show appreciation for any Queen trivia and history. What to do,I dunno.It isn't done as often as CNB and a few others would like you to believe. Yes, I have been blamed for threads being locked, and that's not down to me or I had any input in it. Yep, Amazon has discussion threads about many a topic. I guess that's where CNB and a few others let their complaints and at times lies about QOL out. It's happened a lot. I doubt CNB and mithril are even Queen fans. Thousands of posts on QOL and rarely any about Queen, let alone Freddie unless comparing him with Lambert. That speaks volumes to me. I would have liked to have their thoughts on other subjects, I think CNB praised Obama and blasted the Republicans, and mithril posted in a LOTR thread a few times. Other than that, their sole being at QOL was for Lambert only, and to promote him, defend him and defend the other Glamberts they felt were "wronged". |