splicksplack 25.10.2013 19:11 |
OK. This is from the horses mouth as it were. Saw The Feeling in SBE tonight (and fantastic they were too), The support was Yellowire. Lead singer father being Jim Beach, Saw the lead singer at the bar and after congrats for the set asked him to tell his Dad to drop the endless Magic stuff. Obviously politely. He then said "tell him yourself" and pointed towards Jim Beach. He was the most gracious and polite person anyone could have wished to meet. While I suspect he may not have the full story he did, unfortunately, confirm that we will never get Earl's Court in it's entire form due to the piano mic problems. He said a "best of" live thing may happen that will certainly show the Earl's court stuff.so I was so shocked to see him that I totally forgot what to say. But he was lovely and his friends/family around him were too. Even taking a photo of us together. |
inu-liger 25.10.2013 19:54 |
Interesting. |
Thistle 25.10.2013 20:06 |
That's a shocker, after you saying that, at 71, you doubted he would have come over from Switzerland lol. Glad you got the chance to actually ask him about some of this :) |
MERQRY 25.10.2013 20:59 |
QP logic: Earls Court 1977: "we will never get Earl's Court in it's entire form due to the piano mic problems." Rock in Rio 1985: "we will release a fuckin' home vhs rip, even when the sound mix is awful." |
lemonysnick123 25.10.2013 22:22 |
MERQRY wrote: QP logic: Earls Court 1977: "we will never get Earl's Court in it's entire form due to the piano mic problems." Rock in Rio 1985: "we will release a fuckin' home vhs rip, even when the sound mix is awful."Their logic so fucking ridiculous |
DepeX 26.10.2013 02:06 |
Although Earls Court won't released, QP can release HOUSTON or RAINBOW or HAMMERSMITH... |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 02:35 |
splicksplack wrote: OK. This is from the horses mouth as it were. Saw The Feeling in SBE tonight (and fantastic they were too), The support was Yellowire. Lead singer father being Jim Beach, Saw the lead singer at the bar and after congrats for the set asked him to tell his Dad to drop the endless Magic stuff. Obviously politely. He then said "tell him yourself" and pointed towards Jim Beach. He was the most gracious and polite person anyone could have wished to meet. While I suspect he may not have the full story he did, unfortunately, confirm that we will never get Earl's Court in it's entire form due to the piano mic problems. He said a "best of" live thing may happen that will certainly show the Earl's court stuff.so I was so shocked to see him that I totally forgot what to say. But he was lovely and his friends/family around him were too. Even taking a photo of us together.Thanks for this news |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 02:35 |
queenFoc wrote: Although Earls Court won't released, QP can release HOUSTON or RAINBOW or HAMMERSMITH...Houston has same problem as EARLS COURT |
Hangman_96 26.10.2013 02:44 |
I've heard a lot about such "best of" live things and many other pending live releases that never saw the light of day. That said, I won't believe it until I hold it in my hands, or until I see an official press release. |
cmsdrums 26.10.2013 03:25 |
Hooray. Another 'Rare Live' featuring a few tracks from each gig that we know exists in its entirety! |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 03:29 |
They filmed both shows. Is it so hard to release this gig as a compilation? Is it so difficult and expensive to work with the sound? Isn't it easier to say that they are simply lazy than make up such a story? |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 03:30 |
Acmsdrums wrote: Hooray. Another 'Rare Live' featuring a few tracks from each gig that we know exists in its entirety!Better Rare and the Best of 70's live |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 03:59 |
splicksplack wrote: OK. This is from the horses mouth as it were. Saw The Feeling in SBE tonight (and fantastic they were too), The support was Yellowire. Lead singer father being Jim Beach, Saw the lead singer at the bar and after congrats for the set asked him to tell his Dad to drop the endless Magic stuff. Obviously politely. He then said "tell him yourself" and pointed towards Jim Beach. He was the most gracious and polite person anyone could have wished to meet. While I suspect he may not have the full story he did, unfortunately, confirm that we will never get Earl's Court in it's entire form due to the piano mic problems. He said a "best of" live thing may happen that will certainly show the Earl's court stuff.so I was so shocked to see him that I totally forgot what to say. But he was lovely and his friends/family around him were too. Even taking a photo of us together.It is even strange that he all of a sudden said about Earls Court, and not about Houston, Hammersmith 1979. It's very strange. I can only assume that there were preconditions for release Earls Court, after release Rainbow show , but didn't succeed. |
. 26.10.2013 04:53 |
If the complete second night is in the archives then why not release that one instead? Or were there mic problems on both nights? I was there: link |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 05:05 |
The Kurgan wrote: If the complete second night is in the archives then why not release that one instead? Or were there mic problems on both nights? I was there: linkIf you was there, please tell a story, please! |
pittrek 26.10.2013 07:23 |
Sounds like complete bullshit. IF there are problems with the piano mike, they a) will be absolutely ignored by the fans who are waiting for a release worth buying for many, many years b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary So "problems with the piano mike" is a VERY lame excuse. |
rocknrolllover 26.10.2013 08:28 |
?pittrek wrote: Sounds like complete bullshit. IF there are problems with the piano mike, they a) will be absolutely ignored by the fans who are waiting for a release worth buying for many, many years b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary So "problems with the piano mike" is a VERY lame excuse.I'm agree with you |
cmsdrums 26.10.2013 09:45 |
You only have to look at the classic 70s gigs that The Who have released (with varying video and audio quality) to great commercial and critical success in the last few years to see that there IS a market for these releases, regardless of the odd mic failure. Only QPL can't see this. |
Negative Creep 26.10.2013 10:15 |
Two nights recorded to multitrack and most likely a live stereo mix, and they can't put together a compilation of both nights? As if. Utter bullshit, but no surprise you'd get such a response from someone from QPL - as they have no interesting in releasing stuff for Queen fans. |
. 26.10.2013 10:36 |
If they don't want to release it then at least offer a download for the loyal fans. I would love to see the second night again, top of my list. |
noorie 26.10.2013 10:42 |
The Kurgan wrote: I was there: linkWow! You are soo lucky! I wish somebody would start a new thread about their experiences at a live Queen show for those of us who did not get that chance. |
Elektra 26.10.2013 11:31 |
pittrek wrote: Sounds like complete bullshit. IF there are problems with the piano mike, they a) will be absolutely ignored by the fans who are waiting for a release worth buying for many, many years b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary So "problems with the piano mike" is a VERY lame excuse.Totally Agree with you all this can be fixed like all of their Recordings the problem is that he is Old and cant be Bothered so the easier the Better! Boring old Fart! I still dont like him |
Hangman_96 26.10.2013 12:57 |
The Kurgan wrote: If they don't want to release it then at least offer a download for the loyal fans. I would love to see the second night again, top of my list.If it was that easy, we all would have got all of the live stuff we want ages ago. Take heart from the way things are now. |
Hangman_96 26.10.2013 13:14 |
Elektra wrote:We all know it only takes one man or, at best, a few men in charge of what's in the archives to let it be released. So yes, indeed, it's a lame excuse and nothing more than this.pittrek wrote: Sounds like complete bullshit. IF there are problems with the piano mike, they a) will be absolutely ignored by the fans who are waiting for a release worth buying for many, many years b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary So "problems with the piano mike" is a VERY lame excuse.Totally Agree with you all this can be fixed like all of their Recordings the problem is that he is Old and cant be Bothered so the easier the Better! Boring old Fart! I still dont like him If they want to release it, they will release it; if they don't, they won't. Plain and simple. Nobody tells them what to release and what not to. Things like that can be somehow overdubbed. They've released many other live things with similar problems, and the thing is they HAVE released them! So what stops them from giving these concerts the right treatment is beyond my understanding. |
QueenFan76 26.10.2013 14:20 |
Bullshit. On the bootleg I have, the piano sounds perfectly fine. Then again we're dealing with dickheads who didn't include the "Its only a bloody record" line from MK and edited Freddie's voice cracking, so.... |
inu-liger 26.10.2013 14:29 |
QueenFan76 wrote: Bullshit. On the bootleg I have, the piano sounds perfectly fine.I think Jim was referring to the vocal microphone located AT the piano. |
horse feathers 26.10.2013 15:07 |
As a musician, the software available now, is off the scale and the things you can do with them are amazing. One of the simplest things I did, was with 'DSMN' and corrected Freddie's bum piano note, with a programme called 'Melodyne Editor'. Which uses a tchnique called 'DNA', direct note access. Which enables you to go into a fully mixed track and mess about with individual notes in there. I used the stems they put up for DSMN, for the remix thing they did and simply moved the wrong note in the piano track. It is also possible to move that note in the full mix version too. Also, there is another programme by Izotope, called RX3. That is used for restoring bad recordings. This latest version has only just come out, the things it can do, are again, astonishing. I have used it on Queen's live tracks to remove feedback from the microphone, even crowd noises and fret buzz and so on. It really is that precise. So all the Earls Court stuff, can and could be restored. You have to ask yourselves, if QPL are really that bothered in releasing this stuff, when they get more mileage out of 80's Queen and all their 'poppy' stuff? I know they are not. So they are only interested in the younger generation, getting in to Queen and not bothered by the die hard 'real' Queen fans, who know how exceptional they were in the 70's. |
splicksplack 26.10.2013 16:57 |
I know it's frustrating but I was hardly in a position to argue the toss with him. And I guess he relies on what his 'tech' people tell him is possible. The bottom line is that QPL should be more open about what they've got and what they can release. And if they can't for 'business reasons' (i.e. it won't buy Roger another yacht) then just be honest about it. Arguing with successful blokes in their 70's is just pointless because they can just say "I don't fucking care, I'm outta here soon". I'm saddened by the business decisions QPL have taken but I'll just remember the good times and not give them another penny. I'd suggest you all do the same and not indulge them any further. As I originally said, JB was charming, I have no personal gripe with him and I'm grateful for him bothering to give me his time. |
splicksplack 26.10.2013 16:58 |
splicksplack wrote: I know it's frustrating but I was hardly in a position to argue the toss with him. And I guess he relies on what his 'tech' people tell him is possible. The bottom line is that QPL should be more open about what they've got and what they can release. And if they can't release something that we want for 'business reasons' (i.e. it won't buy Roger another yacht) then just be honest about it. Arguing with successful blokes in their 70's is just pointless because they can just say "I don't fucking care, I'm outta here soon". I'm saddened by the business decisions QPL have taken but I'll just remember the good times and not give them another penny. I'd suggest you all do the same and not indulge them any further. As I originally said, JB was charming, I have no personal gripe with him and I'm grateful for him bothering to give me his time. |
splicksplack 26.10.2013 17:00 |
Sorry bout double post bollox |
antiden 27.10.2013 01:03 |
Here's some more proof, that footage from the second Earls Court night might exist in its entirety: link |
rocknrolllover 27.10.2013 01:42 |
antiden wrote: Here's some more proof, that footage from the second Earls Court night might exist in its entirety: linkI am afraid to disappoint you it's the frame of the concert from 06.06.1977 not from 07.06.1977 |
antiden 27.10.2013 03:34 |
|
antiden 27.10.2013 03:35 |
rocknrolllover, first check and only then post your statements. This is from the SECOND night. |
rocknrolllover 27.10.2013 03:46 |
antiden wrote: rocknrolllover, first check and only then post your statements. This is from the SECOND night.I'm sorry , you're right. Thanks. What a documentary where were these bits? |
pittrek 27.10.2013 05:34 |
I wonder who's "Queen collector" :-) The sound is pretty good |
Adam Baboolal 27.10.2013 07:13 |
There's something really interesting about people who assume they know what the "piano mic" problem is without being told exactly what the problem seems to be. And they even insist, it MUST be fixable! Get a grip - no-one here knows what this off-hand comment means! For all we know, this mic cuts out on whole songs. Maybe the connector was pulled from the mic at one point and no-one noticed. Or, perhaps it had a loose connection and cut out intermittently due to vibrations and a loose connection. We don't know! And pittrek, I'm surprised you haven't realised that people of QZ would destroy any notion of overdubs. Overdub Freddie's piano playing?? Blasphemy! Even overdubs that could (potentially) fix the alleged issues. Issues, I must add, that we have no knowledge of in the first place. Instead of people bitching in the shadows, why doesn't someone approach an official channel and start a dialogue with them? Maybe then, you'd find some real answers to your queries. And if anyone says it's impossible, you're not trying! |
pittrek 27.10.2013 07:18 |
Adam Baboolal wrote: There's something really interesting about people who assume they know what the "piano mic" problem is without being told exactly what the problem seems to be. And they even insist, it MUST be fixable! Get a grip - no-one here knows what this off-hand comment means! For all we know, this mic cuts out on whole songs. Maybe the connector was pulled from the mic at one point and no-one noticed. Or, perhaps it had a loose connection and cut out intermittently due to vibrations and a loose connection. We don't know! And pittrek, I'm surprised you haven't realised that people of QZ would destroy any notion of overdubs. Overdub Freddie's piano playing?? Blasphemy! Even overdubs that could (potentially) fix the alleged issues. Issues, I must add, that we have no knowledge of in the first place. Instead of people bitching in the shadows, why doesn't someone approach an official channel and start a dialogue with them? Maybe then, you'd find some real answers to your queries. And if anyone says it's impossible, you're not trying!Adam, I am strictly AGAINST overdubbing, that's why I wrote b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessaryAnd honestly, both nights are out - the first one complete, the second one just different segments. Yes, Freddie's mic had problems, but we know how the nights sound and the quality is perfectly acceptable. That's what I was trying to say with my post. |
rocknrolllover 27.10.2013 07:59 |
antiden wrote: rocknrolllover, first check and only then post your statements. This is from the SECOND night.I'm sorry but this 06.06.1977, just other angle |
cmsdrums 27.10.2013 09:05 |
pittrek wrote:I don't have too much of an issue with them doing it if "necessary" - ie a technical error such as mic failure etcAdam Baboolal wrote:Adam, I am strictly AGAINST overdubbing, that's why I wroteb) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary Unfortunately on releases to date they've only done it when it's completely unnecessary - ie out of vanity - and I really can't abide that. |
rocknrolllover 27.10.2013 09:59 |
antiden wrote: Here's some more proof, that footage from the second Earls Court night might exist in its entirety: linkWhere are your evidence ? |
Hangman_96 27.10.2013 10:56 |
I can confirm with 99% certainty that it does indeed come from the second night. Not really sure about the bits in the middle and the ending though, but they all do seem to be from the second night. |
. 27.10.2013 11:54 |
None of this proves the complete second night is in the archives, but it doesn't disprove it either. Whether or not it's good quality is another matter. More than one collector has claimed the complete second night exists, it's up to them to prove it. Only this may force the QPL hand. |
Adam Baboolal 27.10.2013 12:07 |
pittrek wrote: And honestly, both nights are out - the first one complete, the second one just different segments. Yes, Freddie's mic had problems, but we know how the nights sound and the quality is perfectly acceptable. That's what I was trying to say with my post.What is the source for these released nights? Official or unofficial? To be frank about this, this news from Beach doesn't explain anything. It's too easy to assume (as you have) that it could be Freddie's mic problems that he's referring to. Unfortunately, he didn't make it clear and referred to a "piano mic" problem. Because of this, I could easily say that maybe the multitrack elements have taken damage and the piano mic stuff has beared the brunt of that damage. It's easy for either of us to claim what 'could' be the problem. So, it's more beneficial to ask, say, Brian's message section on his official site. It's worth a try, right? |
Vocal harmony 27.10.2013 12:27 |
What other piano mic would there be? |
cmsdrums 27.10.2013 14:10 |
Vocal harmony wrote: What other piano mic would there be?Not sure if we're talking about the actual piano mic (ie the one mic'ing up the piano), or the vocal mic Freddie uses at the piano. In either case, could they not release the parts of the gig where Freddie isn't using either? Not sure how many of the tracks feature the piano, but I'm sure someone could say? If it's something like 50% perhaps they could just release the rest as bonus material on something like the Houston gig? Having said that, certainly some of the piano based stuff is useable as we've seen You Take My Breath Away, Millionaire's Waltz etc in official releases before. |
Adam Baboolal 27.10.2013 17:56 |
Vocal harmony wrote: What other piano mic would there be?I think CMS drums just posted what I was thinking, e.g. Did he mean an actual piano mic or a mic for vocals AT the piano. For the moment, it's too ambiguous. |
Vocal harmony 27.10.2013 18:05 |
The piano never had a mic on it. The system used was a Helpinstil piano pickup. Either attached to the inside of the lid or the sound board. It works in the same way as a humbucker guitar pickup works. FM's piano used two, one fed direct to the stage box and out to the FOH mixing desk. The other was used to power FM's monitoring system. The small control box which is always visible next to the piano keyboard was the control box for the system. It was fed into the two speaker cabs to Freddies right near the piano. A mono feed was taken from the second pickup to feed the FOH system incase the main system failed. The mic drop outs that JB is talking about has to be FM's vocal mic. If they filmed and or recorded both nights then they could easily use the vocal recording from the other night to fill in any gaps. They've never been above "fixing" live recordings before. |
cmsdrums 28.10.2013 02:13 |
Cheers - I wasn't aware that Freddie used the Helpinstill rather than mics on the road. Unless it was these that failed, and Jim Beach is just not too clued up in the technicalities and just referred to these pick ups as 'a mic', then it does indeed seem that we are indeed dealing with the vocal mic at the piano as the issue preventing an Earls Court release; not insurmountable surely with two nights in the can? |
The Real Wizard 28.10.2013 09:17 |
Rational discussion on QZ? Is this the apocalypse? |
brENsKi 28.10.2013 10:11 |
cmsdrums wrote: Cheers - I wasn't aware that Freddie used the Helpinstill rather than mics on the road. Unless it was these that failed, and Jim Beach is just not too clued up in the technicalities and just referred to these pick ups as 'a mic', then it does indeed seem that we are indeed dealing with the vocal mic at the piano as the issue preventing an Earls Court release; not insurmountable surely with two nights in the can?i'd agree with this. it would appear the prob was about vocal mics - the various versions of the boots - esp dvd/videos i've seen have vocal "drop outs" |
cmsdrums 28.10.2013 10:29 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Rational discussion on QZ? Is this the apocalypse?If the few sane and rational ones of us here stick together we can outlive the trolls! :-) |
rocknrolllover 28.10.2013 10:47 |
Trolls don't here |
splicksplack 28.10.2013 11:53 |
I'm pretty certain that he was talking about the vocals. Can't remember the exact words but that was the impression I was given |
zephead2112 29.10.2013 03:51 |
cmsdrums wrote:I'll drink to that!The Real Wizard wrote: Rational discussion on QZ? Is this the apocalypse?If the few sane and rational ones of us here stick together we can outlive the trolls! :-) |
ParisNair 31.10.2013 08:29 |
zephead2112 wrote:Are you guys gonna stop trolling and come back on topic?cmsdrums wrote:I'll drink to that!The Real Wizard wrote: Rational discussion on QZ? Is this the apocalypse?If the few sane and rational ones of us here stick together we can outlive the trolls! :-) |
Bad Seed 31.10.2013 12:17 |
I'd be very surprised if both nights had the same problem. Surely if these shows were being recorded to multitrack at least one person would be responsible for recording the show and listening back to the recording. We know that there were no problems with the stage mics (apart from the odd drop out), so either the mic track was muted or there was a problem with the signal going to the multitrack. Even if this was the case on the first night it must have been remedied for the second. I'm sure it's much less of a problem than what Beach is making out, if a problem at all. |
. 31.10.2013 12:34 |
Does anyone know what concert this screen shot is from? link |
Hangman_96 31.10.2013 14:37 |
^ oh Lord, this is what I was talking about on this forum ages ago! But sadly nobody would believe me back then... It seems to be the bit of the video I once saw in a documentary. |
. 31.10.2013 15:25 |
^ Is there a link to the thread? |
slithybill 31.10.2013 16:20 |
This might be it: link |
Hangman_96 31.10.2013 16:43 |
^ yep, that's the thread I was talking about. P.S. I'm feeling quite stupid now, looking at my old posts from three years ago... |
. 31.10.2013 17:03 |
^ So we can establish the screen shot I posted is not from any documentary you saw. Perhaps GT might know where it is from? Thanks for the link slithybill. |
Hangman_96 31.10.2013 18:19 |
The Kurgan wrote: ^ So we can establish the screen shot I posted is not from any documentary you saw. Perhaps GT might know where it is from?What is the source of this screenshot? |
splicksplack 01.11.2013 07:18 |
Well definitely not first EC night. |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 01.11.2013 07:53 |
The Kurgan wrote: ^ So we can establish the screen shot I posted is not from any documentary you saw. Perhaps GT might know where it is from? Thanks for the link slithybill.The question also is : is this a still shown in a documentary or is it a actual moving film of a live performance shown during the documentary. If it was used as a moving picture in a documentary fans would have noticed it. Because to this point we don't have footage of FM wearing his mask. To me I would prefer to think that this could be from a documentary and this is a still shown during the documentary. |
inu-liger 26.10.2014 06:56 |
pittrek wrote: Sounds like complete bullshit. IF there are problems with the piano mike, they a) will be absolutely ignored by the fans who are waiting for a release worth buying for many, many years b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary So "problems with the piano mike" is a VERY lame excuse.Well it turns out the problem with the piano mic is more than just a "problem" if Kes' post over at Queenonline is 100% accurate (and I admit it does make unfortunate logical sense here - I've had recent similar issues in some of our own live multitrack recording situations) http://discuss.queenonline.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&p=325887#p325920 Kes wrote: Did you hear the story about when they looked into releasing it (Earl's Court) a few years ago; when VHS was still the major format? They listened through the multitracks and discovered a completely blank channel on it. The one that was meant to be Freddie's piano based microphone. They still have his voice, on the two channels that were reserved for the "front of house" stereo mix for the PA sound, just no isolated track. Anyway, it bugged the band enough, that they completely postponed the release. |
Doga 26.10.2014 07:31 |
So: NO Hammersmith 75 NO Hyde Park 76 (according to Roger) NO Houston (no multitrack) NO Earl's Court (problems with the piano and voice mics) NO Japan 79 (for Freddie's voice) Our last hope are Hammersmith and Paris 79? |
Oscar J 26.10.2014 07:34 |
They don't have the multitrack from Hammersmith 79 either, do they? |
GERRYISADICK 26.10.2014 11:56 |
Doga wrote: So: NO Hammersmith 75 NO Hyde Park 76 (according to Roger) NO Houston (no multitrack) NO Earl's Court (problems with the piano and voice mics) NO Japan 79 (for Freddie's voice) Our last hope are Hammersmith and Paris 79?And Rio 1-12-85 Along with the '81 south american shows |
Negative Creep 26.10.2014 12:13 |
inu-liger wrote:Aside from that information being unverified (and seemingly about 20 years out of date if there's even any truth to it to begin with), they would still have the soundboard mix which could easily be embedded within the audio from the multitrack so seems a bit of a non-argument against it's release unless the vocals in question are so ugly they can't be used (the bootleg video suggests that wouldn't be the case - and those vocals are crystal clear and mixed within the genuine multitrack elements wouldn't be an issue). I find it a bit hard to believe if there was any truth to that story that it'd be true for both nights either. It would also confirm that the audio on the bootleg video was the raw soundboard mix.pittrek wrote: Sounds like complete bullshit. IF there are problems with the piano mike, they a) will be absolutely ignored by the fans who are waiting for a release worth buying for many, many years b) the worst cases can be overdubbed pretty easily, if they feel it's necessary So "problems with the piano mike" is a VERY lame excuse.Well it turns out the problem with the piano mic is more than just a "problem" if Kes' post over at Queenonline is 100% accurate (and I admit it does make unfortunate logical sense here - I've had recent similar issues in some of our own live multitrack recording situations) http://discuss.queenonline.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&p=325887#p325920Kes wrote: Did you hear the story about when they looked into releasing it (Earl's Court) a few years ago; when VHS was still the major format? They listened through the multitracks and discovered a completely blank channel on it. The one that was meant to be Freddie's piano based microphone. They still have his voice, on the two channels that were reserved for the "front of house" stereo mix for the PA sound, just no isolated track. Anyway, it bugged the band enough, that they completely postponed the release. |
The Real Wizard 26.10.2014 13:08 |
Kes wrote: They listened through the multitracks and discovered a completely blank channel on it. The one that was meant to be Freddie's piano based microphone.This happened both nights ??! A lot of people seem to forget that there were two nights at Earls Court, both of which were filmed and properly recorded. If this story is true, then how did they create a new mix of the audio of the complete first night as heard at the Stormtroopers in Stilettoes exhibition in 2011? Or was that not the complete show? |
The Real Wizard 26.10.2014 13:18 |
This is what was played for the public in 2011. It is undeniably a different mix than the old video feed, created in the last few years. |
thomasquinn 32989 26.10.2014 13:54 |
Oscar J wrote: They don't have the multitrack from Hammersmith 79 either, do they?A little birdie told me it was recovered at some point in the fairly recent past, but I can't confirm that definitely. |
GERRYISADICK 26.10.2014 13:59 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:Aww nice!Oscar J wrote: They don't have the multitrack from Hammersmith 79 either, do they?A little birdie told me it was recovered at some point in the fairly recent past, but I can't confirm that definitely. |
Oscar J 26.10.2014 15:50 |
A complete Hammersmith '79 would be an absolutely epic release. |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 26.10.2014 18:49 |
The Kurgan wrote: ^ So we can establish the screen shot I posted is not from any documentary you saw. Perhaps GT might know where it is from? Thanks for the link slithybill.This screenshot is from the Dutch documentary named "The Story of Queen" by Veronica broadcasted 1987 The used some photo's to fill up gaps. Including this one. I am 100% sure. |
Hangman_96 28.10.2014 12:49 |
Oscar J wrote: They don't have the multitrack from Hammersmith 79 either, do they?As far as I know, they do. A few years ago someone confirmed they did have the multitracks at the time, but then again nobody knows whether it was true or not. I only want to hope so! |
Hangman_96 28.10.2014 12:55 |
Jefffabiano wrote:The shows you are talking about are of much less interest than those from the 70's. We are all tired of all these moustached concerts, even if some of them have never been officially released. Besides, such things as the second night at EC, Paris and Hammy '79 have never seen the light of day in all their entirety, so surely they would be much more worth a release than that unofficial albeit complete stuff from the 80's.Doga wrote: So: NO Hammersmith 75 NO Hyde Park 76 (according to Roger) NO Houston (no multitrack) NO Earl's Court (problems with the piano and voice mics) NO Japan 79 (for Freddie's voice) Our last hope are Hammersmith and Paris 79?And Rio 1-12-85 Along with the '81 south american shows |
Doga 28.10.2014 17:18 |
^ This. The Works Tour is probably my last favourite tour, the band members were tired of each other's, they did it for the ca$h and the electronic drums sounds horrible. (I must admit the bonus tracks of RIR sound great in the 2011 remasters) And for the South American shows... Rock Montreal is stronger, i think The Game era is well covered with RM. Is really sad that none of the '75 - '78 tours is releaseable. |
Nitroboy 28.10.2014 17:31 |
Doga wrote: ^ This. The Works Tour is probably my last favourite tour, the band members were tired of each other's, they did it for the ca$h and the electronic drums sounds horrible. (I must admit the bonus tracks of RIR sound great in the 2011 remasters) And for the South American shows... Rock Montreal is stronger, i think The Game era is well covered with RM. Is really sad that none of the '75 - '78 tours is releaseable.If they were to do another The Game Tour release, it should be a 1980 show, they're superior to the South American ones. |
Negative Creep 28.10.2014 18:33 |
The Real Wizard wrote:It's worth noting that "Kes" is a bit of a self appointed unofficial mouth piece and this wouldn't be the first untruth (AKA - the official line) they've spread. The picture disc version of Roger Taylor's latest album was "limited" to 5000 copies, and (quite rightly it now transpires) scared that they were going to be left with a shit load of left over stock, they got "Kes" to make people on that forum believe it was 500 so they'd go out and buy it in panic with the belief that it would be difficult to obtain and a guaranteed instant rarity. It is currently still available from over 20 different retailers on Amazon alone for well below the original asking price.Kes wrote: They listened through the multitracks and discovered a completely blank channel on it. The one that was meant to be Freddie's piano based microphone.This happened both nights ??! A lot of people seem to forget that there were two nights at Earls Court, both of which were filmed and properly recorded. |
inu-liger 29.10.2014 05:47 |
The Real Wizard wrote: This is what was played for the public in 2011. It is undeniably a different mix than the old video feed, created in the last few years.For whatever reason, clicking the attachment link does nothing. Could you please re-upload it through an alternate method, please and thank you? :) |
The Real Wizard 29.10.2014 09:52 |
Negative Creep wrote: It's worth noting that "Kes" is a bit of a self appointed unofficial mouth piece and this wouldn't be the first untruth (AKA - the official line) they've spread. The picture disc version of Roger Taylor's latest album was "limited" to 5000 copies, and (quite rightly it now transpires) scared that they were going to be left with a shit load of left over stock, they got "Kes" to make people on that forum believe it was 500 so they'd go out and buy it in panic with the belief that it would be difficult to obtain and a guaranteed instant rarity. It is currently still available from over 20 different retailers on Amazon alone for well below the original asking price.Yeah, I'm aware of his general "role" there, but are you sure Kes is taking marching orders from QP, especially those to spread misinformation for profit? That's a pretty hefty accusation. There's one still sitting in a record shop in Amsterdam. |
The Real Wizard 29.10.2014 09:55 |
inu-liger wrote:Yikes, sorry about that ! I guess you can't use FLAC files as attachments here. Item #2195 that's wrong with the functionality of this forum.The Real Wizard wrote: This is what was played for the public in 2011. It is undeniably a different mix than the old video feed, created in the last few years.For whatever reason, clicking the attachment link does nothing. Could you please re-upload it through an alternate method, please and thank you? :) |
The Real Wizard 29.10.2014 10:02 |
Here's the recently done mix of the Earls Court 6-6-77 audio heard at the Stormtroopers in Stilettoes exhibition in 2011. This really should be a huge discussion piece. Who here attended the exhibition? Can they confirm how much of the Earls Court audio was heard?? |
Sue Dounim 29.10.2014 11:28 |
I wouldn't mind a 10 CD boxset of all five shows in Tokyo in 1981. Even if they're just soundboards, I'd really dig it. |
Bad Seed 29.10.2014 14:22 |
The Real Wizard wrote: Here's the recently done mix of the Earls Court 6-6-77 audio heard at the Stormtroopers in Stilettoes exhibition in 2011. This really should be a huge discussion piece. Who here attended the exhibition? Can they confirm how much of the Earls Court audio was heard??Do you know where this came from? Obviously the exhibition but do you know specifically which part? The first night of EC was available to view with stereo sound but NOT remixed. It was the same soundboard/videofeed mix on the bootleg, vocal drop out's and all. Some television screens were showing mini documentaries and I distinctly remember some snippets of DOTL which had clearly been remixed. The sample you've provided probably came from one of these 'mini docs'. |
The Real Wizard 30.10.2014 15:38 |
I can't tell you any more than I know. I hope someone else can add more.. What were these mini-docs you speak of? There definitely is no existing documentary that used this particular part of the EC footage. |
Bad Seed 30.10.2014 16:10 |
They had short films lasting approx 15 mins playing on a continuous loop. I remember my jaw hitting the floor seeing the Houston soundcheck and NOTW tour rehearsal footage for the first time. It was one of these films which featured a few short snippets of a clearly remixed Earls Court. |
on my way up 01.11.2014 15:44 |
Also, the bonus track on the A night at the Opera 2011 remaster of "39 from the second night sounds absolutely fantastic. Not only the sound quality but also the performance. I for one am hoping to one day here the second Earls Court night in full in that kind of quality. The few bits we have heard suggest the second night was far superior in terms of performance... And they might have played both Sweet lady and doing all right. |
The Real Wizard 02.11.2014 11:28 |
Bad Seed wrote: They had short films lasting approx 15 mins playing on a continuous loop. I remember my jaw hitting the floor seeing the Houston soundcheck and NOTW tour rehearsal footage for the first time. It was one of these films which featured a few short snippets of a clearly remixed Earls Court.And that's probably the bit we have here. Disappointing, but thanks for clearing that up. |
Doga 02.11.2014 18:11 |
on my way up wrote: Also, the bonus track on the A night at the Opera 2011 remaster of "39 from the second night sounds absolutely fantastic. Not only the sound quality but also the performance. I for one am hoping to one day here the second Earls Court night in full in that kind of quality. The few bits we have heard suggest the second night was far superior in terms of performance... And they might have played both Sweet lady and doing all right.Considering the circumstances, ''39'' is the perfect song to release in Earl's Court. No piano or piano mic at all. Sad |
The Real Wizard 02.11.2014 18:48 |
Yeah, that does indeed clarify things. So then ten songs on a DVD box set aren't out of the question, then. TYMD, Ogre Battle, Brighton Rock, White Man, The Prophet's Song, KYA, SCC, Now I'm Here, Liar, Jailhouse Rock (second night). (or 11 if they did Sweet Lady on the second night) This sure is an interesting way to be reminded of how interesting the setlists in 1977 were - Mercury spent nearly half the show at the piano. |
splicksplack 03.11.2014 10:53 |
Well they didn't have a 'fifth member' on stage to pad out the sound. FM needed to play some alternative to rhythm guitar when Brian was playing lead. |
Oscar J 03.11.2014 12:19 |
Doga wrote:IF that rumour is true, yes. And if it applies to both nights.on my way up wrote: Also, the bonus track on the A night at the Opera 2011 remaster of "39 from the second night sounds absolutely fantastic. Not only the sound quality but also the performance. I for one am hoping to one day here the second Earls Court night in full in that kind of quality. The few bits we have heard suggest the second night was far superior in terms of performance... And they might have played both Sweet lady and doing all right.Considering the circumstances, ''39'' is the perfect song to release in Earl's Court. No piano or piano mic at all. Sad |
Doga 04.11.2014 00:55 |
Oscar J wrote:That rumor has a lot of weight, and just confirms what Jim Beach said a while ago. EC is unreleaseable. Is even a worse scenario than Knebworth, because the audio is more important than video.Doga wrote:IF that rumour is true, yes. And if it applies to both nights.on my way up wrote: Also, the bonus track on the A night at the Opera 2011 remaster of "39 from the second night sounds absolutely fantastic. Not only the sound quality but also the performance. I for one am hoping to one day here the second Earls Court night in full in that kind of quality. The few bits we have heard suggest the second night was far superior in terms of performance... And they might have played both Sweet lady and doing all right.Considering the circumstances, ''39'' is the perfect song to release in Earl's Court. No piano or piano mic at all. Sad |
Sue Dounim 05.11.2014 19:21 |
It is a shame about EC 77, especially considering how great an official release of Doing All Right live would be. I don't think anyone here would be ecstatic, but I can see complete Tokyo 82 and 85 getting a new DVD release. (i.e. remastered with new audio mix). |
Viper 26.11.2014 05:18 |
So far I'm not sure if the piano mic problem happened again on the second EC night... |
The Real Wizard 26.11.2014 11:50 |
Viper wrote: So far I'm not sure if the piano mic problem happened again on the second EC night...Indeed, this is the big question we'd all like to have answered. |
on my way up 26.11.2014 12:53 |
The Killer Queen clip from the second night sounded mighty fine (Absolute Greatest bonus)! |
mcgroom 26.11.2014 13:00 |
This is what Rhys Thomas said about Earl's Court during his 2012 reddit session when The Great Pretender documentary came out: Earls Court exists but the sound needs a lot of work for a surround sound mix. Picture wise it's good, but only a mixing tape -ie. no rushes like Wembley for example. link So according to his comments it sounds like a full remix could be possible? But maybe its needs a lot of work because of the problems with the piano mic track? |
Nitroboy 26.11.2014 13:54 |
Who cares about a surround sound mix anyway? :( |
Viper 27.11.2014 03:28 |
Right! We want the show anyway! :P |
mcgroom 27.11.2014 09:08 |
Right I agree as well, I don't care about a surround sound mix either. I thought it was interesting though and a glimmer of hope that he makes it sounds like its possible to make something out of what they do have. |