someonewholikesadam wrote:
You forgot the last choice. Adam Lambert does a spectacular job and Queen fans are forced to admit that he is good.
Yes i agree, I saw adam lambert perform with queen in hammersmith last year and it was a good job and amazing evening. Does anyone know what time Queen are on stage as in the UK we are 9 hours ahead so i would have to wake up and tune in at 3.00pm in morning!! and then im not even sure if the stream will work in the UK. link
someonewholikesadam wrote:
You forgot the last choice. Adam Lambert does a spectacular job and Queen fans are forced to admit that he is good.
Wrong: I conceded it in option three. That instead of simulating fellatio onstage the dude would somehow MIRACULOUSLY simulate a ROCK AND ROLL performance.
But I still doubt it. He's musical theater
*theatre.
Still, I was hopeful that more would vote for option one; seeing as how many longtime fans are almost embarrassed by what they perceive to be desperate efforts to remain in the limelight.
Twerking just might be up that alley!!!!
I'd LOVE to hear of a new John Deacon interview as well.
Not much to talk about really, just a lot of over-singing by a man that turns musical phrases into mangled shreds of aural spaghetti. At least Bri and Rog looked happy.
someonewholikesadam wrote:
You forgot the last choice. Adam Lambert does a spectacular job and Queen fans are forced to admit that he is good.
Yes i agree, I saw adam lambert perform with queen in hammersmith last year and it was a good job and amazing evening. Does anyone know what time Queen are on stage as in the UK we are 9 hours ahead so i would have to wake up and tune in at 3.00pm in morning!! and then im not even sure if the stream will work in the UK.
link
...which was exactly, precisely what happened. Open ears, open mind, happy heart.
3rd gig (yes.. Hammersmith was a couple of dates)
But surprisingly Adam Lambert doesn't LOOK LIKE A BITCH onstage? !?!?
CONFOUNDED!
Bravo.
Wish I had a beer to chug in his honor.
They didn't like the other cats (visually/popularity wise... Jeff Scott Soto comes to mind) who could do this gig.
Anyways. This is only based on the ONE song he does impeccably (the ONE song I could find online at the moment)
Pretty damn good (again) only this time something comfortable equaling some stage presence.
(He STOOD most of the song)
I'll leave you all to guess which song it was.
Either way.
READ the setlist.
Short bit.
Hope they were all as good as this but doubtful.
Adam Lambert still has that problem of hitting sustained notes flat and then scooping up to the correct note. In addition, he's still doing the unappealing "goat" vibrato which doesn't work, and he still has a huge problem in hitting middle notes in transition flat.
Yes, he's not as bad as he was in Kiev, but I still say hitting an Eb5 in Bo Rhap's rock section or a C5 in WWRY doesn't work at all. As for Fun, the singer from that group did marginally better than Lambert, but hitting a B4 in STL isn't in the key and the notes he hit on the breakdown before the QE-style ending sounded unnecessary (and it didn't sound too appealing imo).
It's nice to know that Roger and Brian had a fun time on stage, but they need people that can actually sing their material without butchering it to hell.
Much better than the other gigs he's done but that may just be due to the brevity of the show.
That guy from fun really sucked. I don't know which broadcast YOU were watching. Sounded like he was in the wrong key. (All the time!)
Maybe a lil exaggerated. .. but he stunk.
I would have done a much better job than him. Why stretch the song choice to a singer incapable of it?
Puzzling. .... oh right. .... digs at popularity.
Anyways I watched it on an AWESOME audience fan video upload
The channel host name is "riddle601b"
Most shots favor AL but it's no frills no editing. Massive feedback after watc link