QueenZone discussion #1351929

GB: Queen Archivist wrote: Don't tell me... you were born in '94, you're 19,

GB: Queen Archivist wrote: "Don't tell me... you were born in '94, you're 19 Some fans have been waiting 30 years, pal."

andres_clip wrote: people like me and the kid enjoys Fuller tribute to the Queen machine......

oliverd05 wrote: forgive me for being somewhat naive But surely if QPL released the Queen Anthology boxset, they would make a boom from it???

rocknrolllover wrote: Haha GB RULES

rocknrolllover wrote: Nobody trust you and QPL BECAUSE you're all liar right from the start!

L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: I¨m not for David Fuller or support him(never visited his account on YouTube)but QP with its never-ending delay on a decent reléase of some "new" material are contributing to new "David Fullers" to appear in a very near future....

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Haha GB RULES

rocknrolllover wrote: Nobody trust you and QPL BECAUSE you're all liar right from the start!

From asskisser to troll... must be a reflection of the exitless cul-de-sac you live in, eh?

rocknrolllover wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Haha GB RULES

rocknrolllover wrote: Nobody trust you and QPL BECAUSE you're all liar right from the start!

From asskisser to troll... must be a reflection of the exitless cul-de-sac you live in, eh?

Please, stop stink

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Haha GB RULES

rocknrolllover wrote: Nobody trust you and QPL BECAUSE you're all liar right from the start!

From asskisser to troll... must be a reflection of the exitless cul-de-sac you live in, eh?

Please, stop stink

Not my problem the city workers can't access your neighbourhood sewage pipelines. That's what you get for living in such a loopy community.

inu-liger wrote:

L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: I¨m not for David Fuller or support him(never visited his account on YouTube)but QP with its never-ending delay on a decent reléase of some "new" material are contributing to new "David Fullers" to appear in a very near future....

Unfortunately the way you wrote your initial post left it very open to interpretation that you are a Fuller supporter. Next time, don't muddy up your statements in such a lossy manner.

Supersonic_Man89 wrote: GB seems furious with anybody under the age of 25....maybe it suggests that he's feeling old. Maybe he's realised he hasn't fulfilled his lifelong dreams, his ambitions, his goals...maybe he's realised he's failed as an archivist and failed in life, and he's too old to go back and change it.

splicksplack wrote: GB, that post does you no favours whatsoever. And as you're an employee of QPL, it does 'Queen' no favours either. In fact, what with the Freddie gorilla debacle and allowing you to post such playground tit-for-tat posts in the name of 'Queen Archivist', Jm Beach really shows his limitations as a manager, especially when it comes to PR.

Supersonic_Man89 wrote: GB seems furious with anybody under the age of 25....maybe it suggests that he's feeling old. Maybe he's realised he hasn't fulfilled his lifelong dreams, his ambitions, his goals...maybe he's realised he's failed as an archivist and failed in life, and he's too old to go back and change it.

Supersonic_Man89 wrote: GB seems furious with anybody under the age of 25....maybe it suggests that he's feeling old. Maybe he's realised he hasn't fulfilled his lifelong dreams, his ambitions, his goals...maybe he's realised he's failed as an archivist and failed in life, and he's too old to go back and change it.

pittrek wrote: Come on guys, why does every thread Greg starts here end with a personal attack ?

Supersonic_Man89 wrote: So explain his behaviour? Explain his bizarre fixation on declaring that the person replying to his post must be 19, and discriminated towards him because of this. Embarrassingly the person he accused wasn't 19, no where near. Having read quite a few of his posts over the years, he's just an incredibly immature person. He should learn to rise above things, he'd get a lot more respect that way. He does himself no favours with anybody the ways he acts. To my knowledge, he's the only person on this board employed by the band, essentially he's almost representing the band, so he really should act more professionally and not have these time-wasting, life-consuming internet fights with people he's never going to meet. Me included.

Supersonic_Man89 wrote: To my knowledge, he's the only person on this board employed by the band

rocknrolllover wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

rocknrolllover wrote: Haha GB RULES

rocknrolllover wrote: Nobody trust you and QPL BECAUSE you're all liar right from the start!

From asskisser to troll... must be a reflection of the exitless cul-de-sac you live in, eh?

Please, stop stink

splicksplack wrote:
GB, that post does you no favours whatsoever. And as you're an employee of QPL, it does 'Queen' no favours either.
Dearest Splicksplack,
Not that it's any of your business at all, I am NOT an employee of QPL. Never have been. I am self employed.
My views are my own and not those of the band. It's only ill-informed idiots like you that make that assumption.

GB: Queen Archivist wrote:

splicksplack wrote: GB, that post does you no favours whatsoever. And as you're an employee of QPL, it does 'Queen' no favours either. Dearest Splicksplack, Not that it's any of your business at all, I am NOT an employee of QPL. Never have been. I am self employed. OK, Let's just take this apart sunshine. Dearest Splicksplack, Not that it's any of your business at all, IT IS, YOU'RE RESPONDING ON AN OPEN FORUM. I AM ENGAGING WITH YOUR POSTS. I am NOT an employee of QPL. Never have been. I am self employed. AS YOU ARE COMPLETELY AWARE THAT IS AN EMPLOYMENT LAW TECHNICALITY. WHETHER YOU PAY YOUR OWN TAX OR QPL PAYS YOUR TAX IS IMMATERIAL YOU ARE WORKING FOR QPL AND, AS SUCH, ARE A REPRESENTATIVE (whether they like it or not) My views are my own and not those of the band. IN THAT CASE. DOPEY, MAKE IT CLEAR RATHER THAN PROUDLY BOASTING YOURSELF AS THE QUEEN ARCHIVIST. My views are my own and not those of the band. It's only ill-informed idiots like you that make that assumption. IN THAT CASE POST UNDER A NAME NOT CONNECTED TO QPL RATHER THAN GRANDING IT UP AS QUEEN ARCHIVIST (which, as we all know means Fuck All to Queen fans, considering the bollox output so far). Being called an idiot by you is almost a compliment. Ta.

inu-liger wrote: Are you absolutely 100% sure about that, splick? Have you actually talked to GT *in person* long enough, particularly on any given topic where common grounds are shared? Just because someone may display a quiet, more humbled persona doesn't necessarily mean they're not opinionated on anything in particular - some may just natually choose to be quieter on their personal views, and others like Greg can have a more extroverted manner of expressing themselves. Of course, those with shallow mindsets may not always recognize the dynamics between those kinds of qualities, which is unfortunate. But what do you expect, really.

Ozz wrote: GB May, be the worst thing that ever happened to the link between the Queen World and his fans , since.... Paul Prenter maybe...?

splicksplack wrote: No, not spoken to GT. I'm speaking as I find on the forum.

Ozz wrote: Fuller was just an opportunist, kinda full of it,., but GB,,,, oh GB May, be the worst thing that ever happened to the link between the Queen World and his fans , since.... Paul Prenter maybe...? He's bad PR...

GB: Queen Archivist wrote: L-R-TIGER1994 ..... what an extremely tedious and boring twat you are!

Cockeye wrote: 43 years old here. Was at Knebworth. Owns every album on vinyl. The CDs, the American CDs, the entire collection of double Cd reissues. And GB? Ban me if you want but the way you speak in the second post in this thread? Reminiscent of the way the band treat the fans. Our money put the band where it is now. Our adoration got the mansions, the rewards, the multi million pound bank balances. And yes, we got some wonderful moments in return. And we will ever be grateful. But now we are talking about a band who thinks putting a few tracks on an EP makes a "deluxe" edition. And then releases yet another Magic era Cd and DVD. Remember the love and attention given to the WONDERFUL Freddie box set? Where is that now? All you and the band care about now is making another few 0's on the bank balance - and making as much money out of us as possible. And when someone tried to give us genuine fans something new - you go after them like a rabid Rottweiler. GB - I don't expect you to actually CARE, but I have never ever felt so disillusioned with a band as I do with Queen. What happened? That bond between band and fans. That attention to detail? That effort to provide something special? I sometimes wish I could turn off my 35 years of fandom, but I can't. And of course you know that. I shall stand by for your rude, patronising, nasty response. :(