http://www.youtube.com/user/DaveRFuller
He's gone again.
"YouTube account David R. Fuller has been terminated because we have received multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement from claimants, including: Queen Productions, UMG"
Is this the first time QP has been involved in getting his account removed? Cannot see him coming back from this one, he probably will though....
So who is he? since being on here (not long) his name has cropped up many times, checked his youtube once but didn't pay much attention as it was crap.
Please stop bringing attention to his account shutdowns. He was shut down for multiple legal reasons, including selling material he did not have a license nor authorization to sell in the first place.
The last thing we need is more fuel to rekindle the fire from a while back.
inu-liger wrote:
Please stop bringing attention to his account shutdowns. He was shut down for multiple legal reasons, including selling material he did not have a license nor authorization to sell in the first place.
The last thing we need is more fuel to rekindle the fire from a while back.
---and neither do Fanthology have 'a license nor authorization' to possess the un-released music contained on their various mp3's, acetates, vinyls, cassettes etc.
splicksplack wrote:
---and neither do Fanthology have 'a license nor authorization' to possess the un-released music contained on their various mp3's, acetates, vinyls, cassettes etc.
Actually, in quite a few cases - they do.
Moving on..
I am quite sure it was MUCH more that 3 times already. He just isn't able to understand that it's illegal to upload copyrighted material. And his channel contained ONLY copyrighted material
I am quite sure it was MUCH more that 3 times already. He just isn't able to understand that it's illegal to upload copyrighted material. And his channel contained ONLY copyrighted material
YES.... we are trying hard to irradicate this very irritating pest.
Some people think that Queen do not care about such persons stealing, borrowing, pilfering, using, abusing, infringing - call it what you will - property they own, and which the Fullers of this world have no rights to use (whatever silly excuses they spew out in mitigation)... but they are wrong. Queen does care. A great deal.
GB: Queen Archivist wrote:
YES.... we are trying hard to irradicate this very irritating pest.
Some people think that Queen do not care about such persons stealing, borrowing, pilfering, using, abusing, infringing - call it what you will - property they own, and which the Fullers of this world have no rights to use (whatever silly excuses they spew out in mitigation)... but they are wrong. Queen does care. A great deal.
Having been involved in the odd copyright tussle on Youtube, honestly you guys aren't going to ever get rid of him going the way you're going. Takedowns can be pretty easily appealed, and unless you engage with Youtube then they're usually pretty happy to just give the schmo his account back.
Take his ass to court (even the tiniest of writs would do), I'd be glad to stand as a character witness.
Zebonka12 wrote:
Takedowns can be pretty easily appealed, and unless you engage with Youtube then they're usually pretty happy to just give the schmo his account back.
You must be one of the lucky ones then, cos I have had some appeals rejected by the claimants (even with videos that fell under Fair Use!) which as a result has left some videos unplayable in places like Germany ("AMV Heaven Vol. 1" being one of them)
Take his ass to court (even the tiniest of writs would do), I'd be glad to stand as a character witness.
"You must be one of the lucky ones then, cos I have had some appeals rejected by the claimants (even with videos that fell under Fair Use!)"
Bear in mind that Fair Use isn't really a set list of parameters. It has to be argued and decided upon. I don't know what it was that you had taken down, but there's every chance that it didn't actually qualify as 'Fair' in someone else's judgement.