| John S Stuart 16.05.2013 04:05 |
link Is this a UK number "4" or a European number "7"? |
| tcc 16.05.2013 04:08 |
It looks like it was a 4 but someone tried to alter it to a 7. |
| tomchristie22 16.05.2013 06:01 |
I'd say 4. The longer I look at it the weirder it looks, but it doesn't resemble a 7 to me. Plus, Spread Your Wings' outro would have to drag on a fair bit to bring the track's time up to 7 minutes. |
| mooghead 16.05.2013 14:25 |
Whoosh......... |
| horse feathers 16.05.2013 20:01 |
It's really getting very, very silly on this site now? Is it written on paper or parchment? FFS..... |
| inu-liger 16.05.2013 21:21 |
It's a very sloppy 4 |
| inu-liger 16.05.2013 21:22 |
Is there an end prize to these polls, John? :) |
| inu-liger 16.05.2013 21:23 |
horse feathers wrote: It's really getting very, very silly on this site now? Is it written on paper or parchment? FFS.....Not really. He's clearly poking fun at a certain couple of acetates or so that have gotten people debating about whether unreleased extended versions of certain songs actually exist or not. |
| Queen fan 16.05.2013 23:09 |
John S Stuart wrote: link Is this a UK number "4" or a European number "7"?it is def meant to be a number 4 but is a little man with one leg up |
| scottmax 17.05.2013 07:05 |
it's 47...... |
| Thistle 17.05.2013 07:26 |
horse feathers wrote: It's really getting very, very silly on this site now? Is it written on paper or parchment? FFS.....Parchment IS paper :p I can understand why you've said this, HF, but in the context of whats being going down here in the last few weeks, this is making a good point: if you take a bit of time to catch up, I'm sure you'll think differently about it. |
| John S Stuart 17.05.2013 12:28 |
If there was a prize; then it would have to shared between Inu and Thistle boy. therefore; I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of a free posh dinner ticket which can be redeemed at any Michelin Star restaurant of their choice - any time the two meet up together! Yes; there is a point to this. There always is. For those who bothered to click on the link; this is the supposed evidence to suggest that a 7 minute (extended) version of "Spread Your Wings" exists out there. For on continental Europe this timing was read as 7:10. But this was recorded in the UK and I claim it reads 4;00 (roughly the same timing as the regular version). Based on the above evidence alone - do you think this refers to the ordinary 4:00 version - or is this proof of a 7:10 wonder? |
| thomasquinn 32989 17.05.2013 13:30 |
Thistleboy1980 wrote:I'm sorry, what?!!! NO!!!! Parchment is made from hide! It's considerably closer to leather than it is to paper. That is also why it's so durable.horse feathers wrote: It's really getting very, very silly on this site now? Is it written on paper or parchment? FFS.....Parchment IS paper :p |
| Thistle 17.05.2013 16:19 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:Yeah, but whose hide? I was deliberately mistaking parchment for "parchment paper", Thomas.Thistleboy1980 wrote:I'm sorry, what?!!! NO!!!! Parchment is made from hide! It's considerably closer to leather than it is to paper. That is also why it's so durable.horse feathers wrote: It's really getting very, very silly on this site now? Is it written on paper or parchment? FFS.....Parchment IS paper :p But since we're in a pedantic mood: Horses DON'T have feathers :p |
| GratefulFan 17.05.2013 16:22 |
Parchment horses have feathers. They're sold as stationary sets. |
| Thistle 17.05.2013 18:31 |
GratefulFan wrote: Parchment horses have feathers. They're sold as stationary sets.hallelujah: humour is restored :) |
| Mr.QueenFan 17.05.2013 19:26 |
By the way John, are you going to extend this little game of yours to prove the existence of "Hangman" in the studio. You know, a crappy mp3 of part of the song would do the job (meaning that the value of your acetate would be intact). On one side we have the Queen Archivist stating there isn't a studio recording of Hangman, on the other side there's John S Stuart stating that not only there is one, he owns the acetate(?). Since you're in the mood to clarify some things latelly, i figured that maybe you would like to clarify this also? Just sayin.... |
| inu-liger 17.05.2013 19:34 |
John S Stuart wrote: If there was a prize; then it would have to shared between Inu and Thistle boy. therefore; I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of a free posh dinner ticket which can be redeemed at any Michelin Star restaurant of their choice - any time the two meet up together!If I can ever make it out to the UK in the next few years, I'm sure we'll take you up on it! ;-) |
| John S Stuart 17.05.2013 19:37 |
inu-liger wrote:John S Stuart wrote: If there was a prize; then it would have to shared between Inu and Thistle boy. therefore; I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of a free posh dinner ticket which can be redeemed at any Michelin Star restaurant of their choice - any time the two meet up together!If I can ever make it out to the UK in the next few years, I'm sure we'll take you up on it! ;-) That's what I am worried about! |
| John S Stuart 17.05.2013 19:38 |
Mr.QueenFan wrote: By the way John, are you going to extend this little game of yours to prove the existence of "Hangman" in the studio. You know, a crappy mp3 of part of the song would do the job (meaning that the value of your acetate would be intact). On one side we have the Queen Archivist stating there isn't a studio recording of Hangman, on the other side there's John S Stuart stating that not only there is one, he owns the acetate(?). Since you're in the mood to clarify some things latelly, i figured that maybe you would like to clarify this also? Just sayin.... Nae playin'... |
| inu-liger 17.05.2013 19:43 |
John S Stuart wrote:Be veerrrryyyy worried! Muahahahahahainu-liger wrote:That's what I am worried about!John S Stuart wrote: If there was a prize; then it would have to shared between Inu and Thistle boy. therefore; I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of a free posh dinner ticket which can be redeemed at any Michelin Star restaurant of their choice - any time the two meet up together!If I can ever make it out to the UK in the next few years, I'm sure we'll take you up on it! ;-) |
| Thistle 17.05.2013 21:49 |
^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :p Btw John, love the "nae playin'...." retort. Priceless :) |
| inu-liger 17.05.2013 22:51 |
Thistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D |
| Thistle 18.05.2013 05:08 |
inu-liger wrote:Great shout my friend, great shout!! Compound Mr Stuart's misery in one easy-to-access YT vid lol. Although, knowing our luck it would either:Thistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D a) be removed by QPL b) have GBs annoying "Property of....." worked into it. :p |
| inu-liger 18.05.2013 19:38 |
Thistleboy1980 wrote:Or ****** would steal our video mid-production and leak it with his face and name splattered all over the introduction :Pinu-liger wrote:Great shout my friend, great shout!! Compound Mr Stuart's misery in one easy-to-access YT vid lol. Although, knowing our luck it would either: a) be removed by QPL b) have GBs annoying "Property of....." worked into it. :pThistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D |
| Saint Jiub 18.05.2013 19:48 |
inu-liger wrote:Then you would ignore ******, and suck up your ego and release your finished version, and feel good about releasing the best possible version.Thistleboy1980 wrote:Or ****** would steal our video mid-production and leak it with his face and name splattered all over the introduction :Pinu-liger wrote:Great shout my friend, great shout!! Compound Mr Stuart's misery in one easy-to-access YT vid lol. Although, knowing our luck it would either: a) be removed by QPL b) have GBs annoying "Property of....." worked into it. :pThistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D |
| inu-liger 18.05.2013 21:25 |
Panchgani wrote:Quite possibly soinu-liger wrote:Then you would ignore ******, and suck up your ego and release your finished version, and feel good about releasing the best possible version.Thistleboy1980 wrote:Or ****** would steal our video mid-production and leak it with his face and name splattered all over the introduction :Pinu-liger wrote:Great shout my friend, great shout!! Compound Mr Stuart's misery in one easy-to-access YT vid lol. Although, knowing our luck it would either: a) be removed by QPL b) have GBs annoying "Property of....." worked into it. :pThistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D |
| Thistle 19.05.2013 01:05 |
Lol :) |
| The Real Wizard 19.05.2013 14:06 |
Panchgani wrote:Since when are you concerned about the "best possible version" ? Last week you put on your old bullying sneakers (or maybe they were never taken off?) and threatened to share a show in mp3 out of spite.inu-liger wrote:Then you would ignore ******, and suck up your ego and release your finished version, and feel good about releasing the best possible version.Thistleboy1980 wrote:Or ****** would steal our video mid-production and leak it with his face and name splattered all over the introduction :Pinu-liger wrote:Great shout my friend, great shout!! Compound Mr Stuart's misery in one easy-to-access YT vid lol. Although, knowing our luck it would either: a) be removed by QPL b) have GBs annoying "Property of....." worked into it. :pThistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D Classy. |
| Saint Jiub 19.05.2013 17:46 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Maybe someone else would appreciate it perhaps?Panchgani wrote:Since when are you concerned about the "best possible version" ? Last week you put on your old bullying sneakers (or maybe they were never taken off?) and threatened to share a show in mp3 out of spite. Classy.inu-liger wrote:Then you would ignore ******, and suck up your ego and release your finished version, and feel good about releasing the best possible version.Thistleboy1980 wrote:Or ****** would steal our video mid-production and leak it with his face and name splattered all over the introduction :Pinu-liger wrote:Great shout my friend, great shout!! Compound Mr Stuart's misery in one easy-to-access YT vid lol. Although, knowing our luck it would either: a) be removed by QPL b) have GBs annoying "Property of....." worked into it. :pThistleboy1980 wrote: ^ Defo! Inu and I are working on a way to make it happen. Imagine such a scenario: An Aberdonian having to fork out some dough lol :pGotta put it on YouTube!! ;D Bullying?? Pot kettle black? Last I checked Mp3's are allowed on QZ. I have not downloaded anything in 4 years, so I am unlikely to upload anything ... Unless your bullying gets more excessive and inspires me. |