pittrek 19.04.2013 12:34 |
A few comments to all Americans who are spreading complete bullshit about the Boston attackers coming from Czech Republic on all various social media, e.g. link 1. Czechoslovakia doesn't exist since 1992 2. Czech Republic is a completely different country than Chechnya, which was a part of the Soviet Union 3. Citizens of Czechoslovakia are white (or "caucasians" is the "politically correct" term I think) and most of them are atheists or christians |
thomasquinn 32989 19.04.2013 12:47 |
Americans are not, on the whole, noted for their great talents in the field of geography or topography. If it's not in America, they don't know it. As for your point three: Chechens are white, too - the word caucasian means "from the Caucasus", which is where Chechnya is located. |
pittrek 19.04.2013 12:50 |
Thanks for the correction - what is the "politically correct" word that I should use ? |
thomasquinn 32989 19.04.2013 12:56 |
pittrek wrote: Thanks for the correction - what is the "politically correct" word that I should use ?I'm not sure what you mean. Chechens are, I think, a Slavic people, which makes them "white" in the sense in which that word is usually applied. From wikipedia: "Chechens belong to the Caucasoid type, exhibiting traits typical of European and Caucasian peoples. The majority of Chechens are dark-haired (medium to dark brown or black), but there are Chechens with blonde or even red hair, while eye color ranges from blue to brown and skin tone is typically rather pale and light (though there are some Chechens with olive complexions)." Probably most people in Europe would regard them as Eastern European in physical appearance, with the Czechs being considered Central Europeans. |
pittrek 19.04.2013 13:04 |
I see ... so the term I was thinking about probably can't be translated to English. But never mind that :-) |
thomasquinn 32989 19.04.2013 13:45 |
I guess...just out of curiosity (always eager to learn new words, you know), what Czech term were you thinking of? |
waunakonor 19.04.2013 13:47 |
I was just learning a lot about this today because I'm a stupid American and I don't know anything about geography. Apparently a few years ago some terrorism in Chechnya killed 300 kids in an elementary school in the first day of school, and I couldn't help but thinking... 24 people get shot in a school here and we go bonkers, but 300 kids get killed somewhere on the other side of the world and we hear nothing about it? Ugh, we are kind of messed up sometimes. I didn't realize people were mixing up Chechnya and Czech Republic, though. That's hilariously stupid. |
thomasquinn 32989 19.04.2013 13:51 |
Just to clarify: I'm not saying Americans are stupid, I'm saying the vast majority of Americans are ignorant of geography outside their own country. In all fairness, I don't think most Europeans could point out more than about five American states on a map. |
shannaschaffer 19.04.2013 13:52 |
I remember reading about the tragedy in Chechnya over a day or two when it happened, but it definitely didn't stay a headline for long here in the U.S. |
thomasquinn 32989 19.04.2013 13:55 |
shannaschaffer wrote: I remember reading about the tragedy in Chechnya over a day or two when it happened, but it definitely didn't stay a headline for long here in the U.S.Really? Here in Europe, the media were talking about it for weeks! Naturally, it didn't stay on the front pages for that long, but still...they've even aired documentaries about it. |
magicalfreddiemercury 19.04.2013 14:11 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:It was covered constantly on all the news channels - the entire horror of it. We were stunned, saddened, and riveted to the TV and then... nothing.shannaschaffer wrote: I remember reading about the tragedy in Chechnya over a day or two when it happened, but it definitely didn't stay a headline for long here in the U.S.Really? Here in Europe, the media were talking about it for weeks! Naturally, it didn't stay on the front pages for that long, but still...they've even aired documentaries about it. |
pma 19.04.2013 16:07 |
This just in, nhl veteran Jaromir Jagr has just been detained for being a czech terrorist :D |
The Real Wizard 20.04.2013 01:48 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Just to clarify: I'm not saying Americans are stupid, I'm saying the vast majority of Americans are ignorant of geography outside their own country. In all fairness, I don't think most Europeans could point out more than about five American states on a map.Why should they? It's non-essential knowledge of one country. Knowledge of states in one's own country should bear no comparison to being able to name (and locate on a map) five other countries. I bet you my entire music collection that more Europeans can name 5 US states than Americans can name 5 countries other than their own (with the exception of countries the media has told them they should bomb at some point in the last 50 years). |
tero! 48531 20.04.2013 05:16 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Just to clarify: I'm not saying Americans are stupid, I'm saying the vast majority of Americans are ignorant of geography outside their own country. In all fairness, I don't think most Europeans could point out more than about five American states on a map.To be fair, the internal politics of a country are pretty irrelevant to people living outside that country. I'd say it's good enough if you can locate the country and it's capital city. You wouldn't expect an American to recognise the states of Brazil on a map, so why should the brazilians recognise US states either? (I know Brazil is not in Europe, but it's a pretty good comparison!) |
thomasquinn 32989 20.04.2013 05:44 |
The issue is not one of politics, but one of scale: the U.S. is larger than the whole of Europe, so from a topographical point of view I don't think it's unjustified to equate knowing the lay-out of European countries with that of U.S. states or Canadian provinces. I don't think it's strictly necessary for most people to know where all fifty states are located on a map, but I was putting American ignorance of international geography into perspective - on the whole, European high school students can point out more countries on a map than their American peers, but their knowledge of North American topography tends to be as sketchy as that of American students of European topography. Because the U.S. and Canada are countries on a pretty much continental scale, you can't compare their internal topography to that of, say, Germany or France. |
tero! 48531 20.04.2013 10:38 |
I have to disagree, it IS a matter of politics. When you ask a person from Illinois what group of people he identifies himself the most with, the answer is American. When you ask that same question in Paris, the answer is French. The world as we know it today is based on these national states popularised from the 19th century onwards, and that's why it's important to learn the countries, and pretty much unnecessary to learn the states of USA. If we accepted your definition of population/geographical size as the marker for level of knowledge, all the world should also be learning the subdivisions of China, Russia, Brazil and India. |
thomasquinn 32989 20.04.2013 11:11 |
True, and they should. I think as we travel more and faster, and digital communications make the world smaller and smaller, geographical and topographical knowledge are more useful than ever. That doesn't mean I have perfect knowledge of those topics myself, but it is something I work on and believe many more people ought to - it's amazing how often it is useful to have ready knowledge of such things in everyday life. |
*goodco* 20.04.2013 12:12 |
Well, the two a-holes were originally from Kyrgyzstan. Jaromir Jagr.....many Pittsburgh fans wanted him deported when he signed with their bitter rivals, the Philadelphia Flyers. American knowledge of geography: sadly, I'll bet there is a significant percentage who, when asked to name the capital of Africa, would hesitate for a moment before answering 'I don't know'. Or 'what state is our nation's capital in?' 'I don't know' or 'Washington' would get more than a few responses. |
pittrek 20.04.2013 13:39 |
Reminds me on this video :-) link Sorry, I couldn't resist :-) |
tero! 48531 20.04.2013 14:36 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: True, and they should. I think as we travel more and faster, and digital communications make the world smaller and smaller, geographical and topographical knowledge are more useful than ever. That doesn't mean I have perfect knowledge of those topics myself, but it is something I work on and believe many more people ought to - it's amazing how often it is useful to have ready knowledge of such things in everyday life.It's useful, but not that useful as a general knowledge. People have a limited capacity to remember things, and it's usually concentrated on things they are (or feel) the closest to and need the most often. For Europeans that means naming most of the European contries and a few others around the globe, and for the Americans it means most of the US states and a few countries around the world. These days it's easy enough to do a web search about Chechenya before you post a message about those "damn Checks", but some people can't be bothered to make even THAT effort. |
inu-liger 21.04.2013 02:51 |
http://zeenews.india.com/news/world/czechs-angry-at-being-confused-for-chechnya_843568.html |
catqueen 21.04.2013 16:41 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Ah, most americans could name a few countries -- remember Canada, Mexico, and England would all be well known to Americans. They might struggle beyond that (with a few additions -- Germany, France, China, Afghanistan, Iraq, India, Australia, Antarctica, maybe a few others). But i think 5 is a really low number. What i've noticed is that a lot of americans have HEARD of countries (limited countries -- or they have heard of Paris but don't know it's in France, that kind of thing), but they haven't a clue WHERE they are. Like don't ask them to find it on a map, or even to reliably identify the continent it's in.thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Just to clarify: I'm not saying Americans are stupid, I'm saying the vast majority of Americans are ignorant of geography outside their own country. In all fairness, I don't think most Europeans could point out more than about five American states on a map.Why should they? It's non-essential knowledge of one country. Knowledge of states in one's own country should bear no comparison to being able to name (and locate on a map) five other countries. I bet you my entire music collection that more Europeans can name 5 US states than Americans can name 5 countries other than their own (with the exception of countries the media has told them they should bomb at some point in the last 50 years). I still remember the time i was asked how long of a train journey it was from Ireland to the USA. And the comment of 'hmm... Ireland... that's interesting... is that off the coast of New Jersey?' I guess it is... a looong way off the coast of New Jersey! I also remember LOTS of people in america asking slowly and carefully if i speak english (cos obviously i was from somewhere foreign). |
catqueen 21.04.2013 16:43 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Probably most people in Europe would regard them as Eastern European in physical appearance, with the Czechs being considered Central Europeans.Outside of 'central Europe,' very few people use that term. I've never heard anyone described as a 'central European.' They are either European or Eastern European. And a lot of people would say anyone east of the Berlin wall is an eastern european... although my friend from Hungary doesn't consider herself eastern european, so i guess if you're from the middle bit, it's central -- but she still wouldn't describe herself as a 'central' european, she'd just say she's european, but her romanian and polish friends are eastern european. |
catqueen 21.04.2013 16:49 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: The issue is not one of politics, but one of scale: the U.S. is larger than the whole of Europe, so from a topographical point of view I don't think it's unjustified to equate knowing the lay-out of European countries with that of U.S. states or Canadian provinces. I don't think it's strictly necessary for most people to know where all fifty states are located on a map, but I was putting American ignorance of international geography into perspective - on the whole, European high school students can point out more countries on a map than their American peers, but their knowledge of North American topography tends to be as sketchy as that of American students of European topography. Because the U.S. and Canada are countries on a pretty much continental scale, you can't compare their internal topography to that of, say, Germany or France.I don't agree. I don't think it's the same thing at all. America is a fairly new country, and just on the basis of history, american students should be familiar with europe and other countries. American students don't even learn much about the rest of their own continent (and i went through the american school system for a few years). The country is very insular and it shows in their foreign policies, among other things. Maybe if they were more educated about other countries and peoples, they might be a little more understanding of immigrants and of other cultures, and could continue a dialogue rather then just attacking. It might make other people seem more human and interconnected. And even if the USA is big, the world is big and kids have a lot of brain power, they can learn about more then just 50 states. |
thomasquinn 32989 22.04.2013 04:36 |
catqueen wrote:Technically, everything that was part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire (before that: Holy Roman Empire) and the Balkans is considered 'central Europe'. Everything to the east of that is considered Eastern Europe. I don't know where you are from, but in Holland and Belgium, it is very common to speak of Western-, Central- and Eastern Europe when dividing Europe in an east-west line, and of Northern- and Southern Europe when dividing along a north-south line.thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Probably most people in Europe would regard them as Eastern European in physical appearance, with the Czechs being considered Central Europeans.Outside of 'central Europe,' very few people use that term. I've never heard anyone described as a 'central European.' They are either European or Eastern European. And a lot of people would say anyone east of the Berlin wall is an eastern european... although my friend from Hungary doesn't consider herself eastern european, so i guess if you're from the middle bit, it's central -- but she still wouldn't describe herself as a 'central' european, she'd just say she's european, but her romanian and polish friends are eastern european. |
catqueen 22.04.2013 18:07 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:I'm from ireland, maybe we're just backwards :P But i've heard people insist up and down that anything past the berlin wall is eastern. And whatever about describing the location of somewhere -- obviously then you use central -- but i've never heard someone described as a central european, not the same as you'd describe someone as an eastern european. But maybe that's just here.catqueen wrote:Technically, everything that was part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire (before that: Holy Roman Empire) and the Balkans is considered 'central Europe'. Everything to the east of that is considered Eastern Europe. I don't know where you are from, but in Holland and Belgium, it is very common to speak of Western-, Central- and Eastern Europe when dividing Europe in an east-west line, and of Northern- and Southern Europe when dividing along a north-south line.thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Probably most people in Europe would regard them as Eastern European in physical appearance, with the Czechs being considered Central Europeans.Outside of 'central Europe,' very few people use that term. I've never heard anyone described as a 'central European.' They are either European or Eastern European. And a lot of people would say anyone east of the Berlin wall is an eastern european... although my friend from Hungary doesn't consider herself eastern european, so i guess if you're from the middle bit, it's central -- but she still wouldn't describe herself as a 'central' european, she'd just say she's european, but her romanian and polish friends are eastern european. |
pittrek 23.04.2013 05:39 |
Wow :-) link |
catqueen 24.04.2013 12:35 |
pittrek wrote: Wow :-) linkThis is just incredible! |
The Fairy King 24.04.2013 18:46 |
Czech porn is awesome. <3 |
pittrek 25.04.2013 02:13 |
The Fairy King wrote: Czech porn is awesome. <3German porn from the 70's is the best :-) |
The Fairy King 25.04.2013 07:02 |
pittrek wrote:Nah...too hairy :DThe Fairy King wrote: Czech porn is awesome. <3German porn from the 70's is the best :-) |
thomasquinn 32989 25.04.2013 09:35 |
Did this discussion just go from having a laugh at people who think Chechnya = Czech Republic to pornography for the discerning connoisseur in one easy step? |
The Real Wizard 25.04.2013 11:04 |
catqueen wrote:Encouraging.The Real Wizard wrote:Ah, most americans could name a few countries -- remember Canada, Mexico, and England would all be well known to Americans. They might struggle beyond that (with a few additions -- Germany, France, China, Afghanistan, Iraq, India, Australia, Antarctica, maybe a few others). But i think 5 is a really low number. What i've noticed is that a lot of americans have HEARD of countries (limited countries -- or they have heard of Paris but don't know it's in France, that kind of thing), but they haven't a clue WHERE they are. Like don't ask them to find it on a map, or even to reliably identify the continent it's in. I still remember the time i was asked how long of a train journey it was from Ireland to the USA. And the comment of 'hmm... Ireland... that's interesting... is that off the coast of New Jersey?' I guess it is... a looong way off the coast of New Jersey! I also remember LOTS of people in america asking slowly and carefully if i speak english (cos obviously i was from somewhere foreign).thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Just to clarify: I'm not saying Americans are stupid, I'm saying the vast majority of Americans are ignorant of geography outside their own country. In all fairness, I don't think most Europeans could point out more than about five American states on a map.Why should they? It's non-essential knowledge of one country. Knowledge of states in one's own country should bear no comparison to being able to name (and locate on a map) five other countries. I bet you my entire music collection that more Europeans can name 5 US states than Americans can name 5 countries other than their own (with the exception of countries the media has told them they should bomb at some point in the last 50 years). So do we launch the full-on war on xenophobia and ignorance now, or when? |
The Real Wizard 25.04.2013 11:11 |
catqueen wrote: The country is very insular and it shows in their foreign policies, among other things. Maybe if they were more educated about other countries and peoples, they might be a little more understanding of immigrants and of other culturesAnd that is exactly why the situation is never, ever going to change. There is way too much money to be lost if the population were to be properly informed of the way the outside works. The NRA, private health care, the FDA and the military industrial complex all require mass public ignorance in order to exist with impunity. |
The Fairy King 25.04.2013 15:55 |
thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Did this discussion just go from having a laugh at people who think Chechnya = Czech Republic to pornography for the discerning connoisseur in one easy step?Just taking it to the next logical step. |
waunakonor 01.05.2013 16:55 |
I've never been to the Czech Republic. |