| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 08:40 |
as promised on Sharing The Music - Request enjoy link |
| pittrek 06.04.2013 08:52 |
You should ask your money back from Fuller, because this has nothing to do with "trindent studio" :-) It's a fan mix, created from the standard B-side and the intro of We Are The Champions if I remember correctly |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 09:02 |
I did not pay I do not buy but exchange :) |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 09:03 |
Fake fucking fake we are the champions bit and mad the swine |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 09:07 |
I had doubts,but it is not my fault...is that circulate |
| bootLuca 06.04.2013 09:12 |
what a pity! waht about the version with the fade-in intro? link |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 09:37 |
Yuri Queen wrote: I had doubts,but it is not my fault...is that circulateShame on you to spread a fakes |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 09:37 |
bootLuca wrote: what a pity! waht about the version with the fade-in intro? linksimple version nothing new |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 09:40 |
now everyone knows ;) there will be more exchanges |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 09:43 |
smile out of place |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 09:46 |
but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :) |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 09:51 |
Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)well call us names of creates of fakes |
| on my way up 06.04.2013 10:03 |
Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) |
| bootLuca 06.04.2013 10:06 |
rocknrolllover wrote:the version that I know doesn't have the fade-in, it starts with "Been here before"bootLuca wrote: what a pity! waht about the version with the fade-in intro? linksimple version nothing new is the fade-in version a fan made work or it was released officially? |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 10:08 |
bootLuca wrote:Officially was released 1991 version so called David Richards remix.rocknrolllover wrote:the version that I know doesn't have the fade-in, it starts with "Been here before" is the fade-in version a fan made work or it was released officially?bootLuca wrote: what a pity! waht about the version with the fade-in intro? linksimple version nothing new |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 10:13 |
on my way up wrote:ahhahahaahahhahah.....Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) as soon as possible to share Surrender RT original from acetate..... |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 10:42 |
Yuri Queen wrote:no thanks another one fake no need. Yamaguchi '79 recording we wanton my way up wrote:ahhahahaahahhahah..... as soon as possible to share Surrender RT original from acetate.....Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 11:02 |
rocknrolllover wrote:1) no fake,,,, and repeat.. not my work mad the swine,I was not sure of the falseYuri Queen wrote:no thanks another one fake no need. Yamaguchi '79 recording we wanton my way up wrote:ahhahahaahahhahah..... as soon as possible to share Surrender RT original from acetate.....Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) not my fault 2) you think you can decide?!!.. accept what one proposes |
| bootLuca 06.04.2013 11:31 |
rocknrolllover wrote:where can I get it?bootLuca wrote:Officially was released 1991 version so called David Richards remix.rocknrolllover wrote:the version that I know doesn't have the fade-in, it starts with "Been here before" is the fade-in version a fan made work or it was released officially?bootLuca wrote: what a pity! waht about the version with the fade-in intro? linksimple version nothing new |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 11:41 |
bootLuca wrote:download from internet Queen I 1973 hollywood remaster, Queen I 2011 remaster 2CD. But mad the swine start from been here before not I've been here beforerocknrolllover wrote:where can I get it?bootLuca wrote:Officially was released 1991 version so called David Richards remix.rocknrolllover wrote:the version that I know doesn't have the fade-in, it starts with "Been here before" is the fade-in version a fan made work or it was released officially?bootLuca wrote: what a pity! waht about the version with the fade-in intro? linksimple version nothing new |
| Lord Fickle 06.04.2013 12:00 |
I can confirm that the MTS version posted IS a fan mix, because I know the person who did it very well. ;) It was only supposed to be an experiment, and not for public consumption, and was certainly not intentionally publicly shared at any point. |
| bootLuca 06.04.2013 12:12 |
rocknrolllover wrote: download from internet Queen I 1973 hollywood remaster, Queen I 2011 remaster 2CD. But mad the swine start from been here before not I've been here beforeyou haven't read my post on the request forum, I have 2 versions of mad the swine, the one released officially that starts with "here been before" at full volume and another version that starts with a fade-in and the first audible words is "before", I have the "fade-in" version on a cd called "the ultimate queen back catalog vol 1" and I would like to know if it is a some kind of fan made or it is a released version...thank you! |
| rocknrolllover 06.04.2013 12:55 |
bootLuca wrote:rocknrolllover wrote: download from internet Queen I 1973 hollywood remaster, Queen I 2011 remaster 2CD. But mad the swine start from been here before not I've been here beforeyou haven't read my post on the request forum, I have 2 versions of mad the swine, the one released officially that starts with "here been before" at full volume and another version that starts with a fade-in and the first audible words is "before", I have the "fade-in" version on a cd called "the ultimate queen back catalog vol 1" and I would like to know if it is a some kind of fan made or it is a released version...thank you! "the ultimate queen back catalog vol 1" I assume was taken from Queen In Nuce italian bootleg. |
| bootLuca 06.04.2013 13:02 |
you're wrong, the ultimate is dated 1994, in nuce 1995... :) |
| Hangman_96 06.04.2013 13:45 |
on my way up wrote:I suppose that would be an apology from him for providing us with the fake. So yes, I second the Yamaguchi request.Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) |
| Negative Creep 06.04.2013 16:47 |
The version released (which is a remix to accomodate the band's wishes and includes what sounds like digital echo/delay on the lead vocals) in any form doesn't have "I've" faded in whatsoever - it is mixed without an "I've", looking at the waveform confirms that. Whether there's an album acetate that includes an original Mad The Swine mix that has a fade out from the previous track and "I've" intact - I've no idea. Listening to the released version, there's nothing to suggest anything has been edited out - and why would they? Did the band really go "Hhhmm, I don't like that "I've" at the beginning - lets remove it"?! I know someone suggested it's cut because they couldn't remove the drums from the previous track which supposedly overlaps, but that's bollocks because the released version is a fresh remix and would therefore be from a multitracks tape and therefore unsequenced. Someone else had suggested it was just re-mastered - not so... you can only do so much when mastering (particularly with the fairly primitive digital equipment that band were using around then), and there's no way the echo on the vocal isn't digital - which wouldn't have been possible when original recorded/mixed. A non-stand alone version of Mad The Swine isn't very interesting, so it's funny no ones every produced this supposedly unique version. |
| The Real Wizard 06.04.2013 17:31 |
Yuri Queen wrote:You are a dick.on my way up wrote:ahhahahaahahhahah..... as soon as possible to share Surrender RT original from acetate.....Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) And a fool - bands didn't make acetates in the 90s. Hundreds of concerts have been shared here and you have downloaded them all for free. You have a chance to offer one back and you're choosing to act like a child with an extra cookie. I pity you. |
| inu-liger 06.04.2013 17:39 |
In fairness Bob, YQ could be referring to "acetate" CD-R's which certainly did exist in the 90's |
| Yuri Queen 06.04.2013 19:33 |
so.... The Real Wizard... know only offend,shut up... get more information I do not know you and if you already have Yamaguchi,what is your problem?!!! maybe you are liar.... Lostman again 1) I had doubts that it was a fake,not my work 2) I shared the request this is what circulates |
| inu-liger 06.04.2013 21:44 |
Yuri Queen wrote: I did not pay I do not buy but exchange :)I hope you traded something even more fake in return for this shod job :) |
| inu-liger 06.04.2013 21:47 |
rocknrolllover wrote:Good going, advocating piracy of official material!bootLuca wrote: where can I get it?download from internet Queen I 1973 hollywood remaster, Queen I 2011 remaster 2CD. |
| Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 07.04.2013 01:19 |
The Real Wizard wrote:I don't want to take part in the discussion but need to settle something.Yuri Queen wrote:You are a dick. And a fool - bands didn't make acetates in the 90s. Hundreds of concerts have been shared here and you have downloaded them all for free. You have a chance to offer one back and you're choosing to act like a child with an extra cookie. I pity you.on my way up wrote:ahhahahaahahhahah..... as soon as possible to share Surrender RT original from acetate.....Yuri Queen wrote: but what do you want?? I did not create the fake,think of those who took advantage again sorry for english :)Well, maybe you can make up to the rest of us by uploading your entire Yamaguchi '79 recording in lossless:-):-) "bands did not make acetates in the 90's " This is incorrect! There are fewer know compared to 70's agreed. And the format went back to cassettes and in the end of the 90's the acetate cdr was the standard. E.g. All Miracle singles are out there on acetate. The abbeyroad Headlong acetate is out there. The 1 sided show must go on excist. I think we can assume as long as there was plans to release a single on 7" or 12" commercially , there is a acetate made before pressing! |
| Yuri Queen 07.04.2013 06:20 |
inu-liger wrote:hahahahah is a good ideaYuri Queen wrote: I did not pay I do not buy but exchange :)I hope you traded something even more fake in return for this shod job :) |
| Negative Creep 07.04.2013 11:32 |
inu-liger wrote: In fairness Bob, YQ could be referring to "acetate" CD-R's which certainly did exist in the 90'sIgnoring that fact that of course they still fucking made acetates in the 90's as well as so called CD-R "acetates". Town House were still churning them out in 2000. |
| MadTheSwine73 07.04.2013 15:09 |
Just gonna say... I like this song. |
| scottmax 07.04.2013 17:01 |
Shhhhhhh........ |
| The Real Wizard 08.04.2013 10:16 |
ghostwithasmile wrote: "bands did not make acetates in the 90's " This is incorrect! There are fewer know compared to 70's agreed. And the format went back to cassettes and in the end of the 90's the acetate cdr was the standard.Cool, I stand corrected. That said - the person in question is still a dick. |
| The Real Wizard 08.04.2013 10:52 |
Yuri Queen wrote: and if you already have Yamaguchi,what is your problem?!!!Might I suggest you familiarize yourself with the concept of -> more than one version of a show. <- This show has two different audience sources, and your copy of this particular source is either a lower tape generation copy or a better transfer from the master. Thus people are interested. And even if I did have your copy, you're the person who flaunted yours so that's why people (including myself) are wondering why you're not putting the whole thing up. You weren't the taper, so it'll emerge in one way or another. You could take the credit for it, but .... your choice. |
| Yuri Queen 08.04.2013 11:25 |
Meanwhile, share your version.... howerer... think that you do not exist... I'm tired to answer... |
| brENsKi 08.04.2013 11:59 |
what kind of c**tish reply is this ^^^^ you engaged in a discussion - so either discuss it properly or shut the f*** up either way if you want to be treated like an adult - or failing that, an intelligent person stop behaving like a stupid child |
| Yuri Queen 08.04.2013 12:28 |
believe me... forget it |
| Hangman_96 08.04.2013 17:12 |
Yuri Queen wrote: Meanwhile, share your version.... howerer... think that you do not exist... I'm tired to answer...We want Yamaguchi. Now or never. |
| brENsKi 08.04.2013 17:21 |
Yuri Queen wrote: believe me... forget itwe don't believe you (not a fucking word) and we won't forget it |
| Yuri Queen 08.04.2013 18:09 |
here is not yamaguchi,,,,but mad the swine do not worry... your post,know how to convince people .... yeah !!! |
| inu-liger 08.04.2013 18:25 |
Yuri, why do you have the need to act like an immature little brat and not man up instead? You really should try to be human and be civil, instead of acting like the many trolls that keep bringing down this once great website. Some of us ARE capable of forgiving and forgetting, you know (unless you wish to be like the extreme, unforgivable Dave R Fuller type instead) There is genuine interest out there for your Yamaguchi source, count me among them. |
| inu-liger 08.04.2013 20:03 |
Anyways so I've taken a jab at redoing this "full" version, since the intro on the one YQ sounds badly edited (no offense to the remixer!) link Enjoy :) |
| The Real Wizard 08.04.2013 23:48 |
Yuri Queen wrote: Meanwhile, share your version.... howerer... think that you do not exist... I'm tired to answer...Sorry, refresh my memory - what have you contributed to this place besides a fan mix and being a broken English irrational windbag? The nerve you have to demand I feed your sense of entitlement when I'm trying to engage in some meaningful dialogue for everyone's benefit. You purport to have a recording that is slightly lower generation than mine. Why would I want to pollute the trading pool with an inferior copy when you could just as easily put up your copy? Judging by your dismissive attitude, I'm inclined to believe you only have that one song from it. Prove me wrong or shut the fuck up. |
| The Real Wizard 08.04.2013 23:50 |
brENsKi wrote: what kind of c**tish reply is this ^^^^ you engaged in a discussion - so either discuss it properly or shut the f*** up either way if you want to be treated like an adult - or failing that, an intelligent person stop behaving like a stupid childStanding ovation. Thank you for saying what we're all thinking. |
| Flash Jazz 22.05.2013 16:12 |
inu-liger wrote: Anyways so I've taken a jab at redoing this "full" version, since the intro on the one YQ sounds badly edited (no offense to the remixer!) link Enjoy :)Sounds good |
| . 22.05.2013 17:56 |
Cant hear the 've! |
| John S Stuart 22.05.2013 18:02 |
inu-liger wrote: Anyways so I've taken a jab at redoing this "full" version, since the intro on the one YQ sounds badly edited (no offense to the remixer!) link Enjoy :)Inu - forgive me for asking this; but what is the difference between your version and the "original" fake? Personally, I hear no difference. You also missed a trick in that you should have uploaded this to another "Is this the real life, Is this just fantasy thread". ;-P |
| inu-liger 22.05.2013 19:21 |
My version is supposed to have cleaner editing than the jarring edit found on DRF's copy. |
| The Fonz 22.05.2013 19:51 |
aah, a better fake. awesome. |
| The Fonz 22.05.2013 19:52 |
that was more to see if I could still post. Carry on. Nothing to see here. |
| inu-liger 22.05.2013 20:37 |
The Fonz wrote: aah, a better fake. awesome.More like a demonstration of how to do it right when faking something ;-) ANYWAYS, indeed carry on... |
| Saint Jiub 22.05.2013 21:42 |
The Real Wizard wrote:More insider trader bullying ...Yuri Queen wrote: Meanwhile, share your version.... howerer... think that you do not exist... I'm tired to answer...Sorry, refresh my memory - what have you contributed to this place besides a fan mix and being a broken English irrational windbag? The nerve you have to demand I feed your sense of entitlement when I'm trying to engage in some meaningful dialogue for everyone's benefit. You purport to have a recording that is slightly lower generation than mine. Why would I want to pollute the trading pool with an inferior copy when you could just as easily put up your copy? Judging by your dismissive attitude, I'm inclined to believe you only have that one song from it. Prove me wrong or shut the fuck up. |
| inu-liger 23.05.2013 09:47 |
The Kurgan wrote: Cant hear the 've! |
| . 23.05.2013 13:55 |
inu-liger wrote:It's true, am I going deaf?The Kurgan wrote: Cant hear the 've! |
| inu-liger 23.05.2013 17:05 |
The Kurgan wrote:Sorry, my iPhone seems to have cut off the response I tried to post earlier.inu-liger wrote:It's true, am I going deaf?The Kurgan wrote: Cant hear the 've! I had said, try turning up the volume and listen closely, or use studio headphones like my MDR-V6 set, or both :-) |
| . 24.05.2013 04:36 |
inu-liger wrote:I got to buy MDR-V6 headphones to hear 've?The Kurgan wrote:Sorry, my iPhone seems to have cut off the response I tried to post earlier. I had said, try turning up the volume and listen closely, or use studio headphones like my MDR-V6 set, or both :-)inu-liger wrote:It's true, am I going deaf?The Kurgan wrote: Cant hear the 've! |
| inu-liger 24.05.2013 09:40 |
The Kurgan wrote:Not really! It was said slightly in jest :-)inu-liger wrote:I got to buy MDR-V6 headphones to hear 've?The Kurgan wrote:Sorry, my iPhone seems to have cut off the response I tried to post earlier. I had said, try turning up the volume and listen closely, or use studio headphones like my MDR-V6 set, or both :-)inu-liger wrote:It's true, am I going deaf?The Kurgan wrote: Cant hear the 've! Unless you're using iBud 'phones, I wonder why you can't hear it? |
| Ale Solan 24.05.2013 10:15 |
Use headphones Kurgan! No matter the brand or type, just headphones ;) |
| Ale Solan 24.05.2013 10:21 |
by the way, thanks for the little edit, Rich! |
| inu-liger 24.05.2013 16:48 |
No problem Alex :) |
| . 25.05.2013 04:28 |
I think this is hilarious. I can hear the 've in WATC but not on this! I went and bought some Ultrasone signature pro headphones just to hear it, but think I wasted my money. I've just booked an appointment to get my ears syringed. |