FMH 20.03.2013 12:04 |
Hi, QZ lovers! I'm back.Greeting from Freddieismyhero because Freddieismyhero it's me. I forgot password after car accident and because my notebook was damage and long time I can't get internet. But now I'm back and I'm ready to share with you. I hope you never listened it before but if this isn't so, but these tracks has good quality. Keep yourself alive unreleased demo. link |
. 20.03.2013 12:35 |
The man of mystery returns with more goodies! Thanks for sharing. |
FMH 20.03.2013 12:39 |
The Kurgan wrote: The man of mystery returns with more goodies! Thanks for sharing.For your pleasure, The Kurgan |
pittrek 20.03.2013 14:20 |
Unreleased ? It's been a long time since I heard the last time the De Lane Lea demo, but isn't this it ? EDIT - just listening to it and the drum solo sounds different from what I remember and the vocals at the end sound different too. Interesting share, can I ask about more details about this track ? |
FMH 20.03.2013 14:25 |
pittrek wrote: Unreleased ? It's been a long time since I heard the last time the De Lane Lea demo, but isn't this it ? EDIT - just listening to it and the drum solo sounds different from what I remember and the vocals at the end sound different too. Interesting share, can I ask about more details about this track ?I can't give more details,sorry. |
dave76 20.03.2013 14:26 |
Goddamn, this is an awesome share mate. I guess 1971 or 1972. It is completely different. Vocals and drums are different. Where did you find this gem? |
pittrek 20.03.2013 14:28 |
Thanks for this, I assume it's one of the earliest versions, since it's pretty similar to the De Lane Lea demo |
FMH 20.03.2013 14:32 |
dave76 wrote: Goddamn, this is an awesome share mate. I guess 1971 or 1972. It is completely different. Vocals and drums are different. Where did you find this gem?Bought it, but please, don't ask more details, if you want more demos |
FMH 20.03.2013 14:34 |
pittrek wrote: Thanks for this, I assume it's one of the earliest versions, since it's pretty similar to the De Lane Lea demoFor your pleasure, pittrek! I can't understand only one. Why this version wasn 't included in bonus of last studio reissue! |
dave76 20.03.2013 14:41 |
I agree with you FMH. Instead of this gem we got the lane lea demos which all of us fans already had for years. But not this one. I never heard it. You should talk with Brian and Roger :-) Anthology material. |
FMH 20.03.2013 14:45 |
dave76 wrote: I agree with you FMH. Instead of this gem we got the lane lea demos which all of us fans already had for years. But not this one. I never heard it. You should talk with Brian and Roger :-) Anthology material.Huh,dave76! I'm glad that you got pleasure from this track! Brian and Roger are gods for me and not only me! I'm very shy person! Long time ago I tried to talk with Anita Dobson but I can't say no word:-) |
vivaqueen 20.03.2013 15:03 |
MERCI BEAUCOUP |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 20.03.2013 16:59 |
This version appears on the trident Queen I acetate and also on 7" KYA trident acetate. I know one famous fan which ownes the reeltape of this version ( not the trident queen I reeltape which was sold in feb 2012) |
GinjaNinja 20.03.2013 17:02 |
Wonderful! Thanks very much for sharing :) |
denzilsurprise 20.03.2013 17:06 |
Fantastic! And on my birthday as well! I love the acoustic guitars on this. I wonder if we are getting any closer to that elusive demo of Hangman? |
ShortSharpShock 20.03.2013 17:22 |
Thank you so much for this, lovely version! I took some time to clean it up a bit (removing some clicking and crackling), and most of all, repaired the awful clipping. I hope you don't mind. The result can be found here: link Thanks again! |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 20.03.2013 17:23 |
denzilsurprise wrote: Fantastic! And on my birthday as well! I love the acoustic guitars on this. I wonder if we are getting any closer to that elusive demo of Hangman?Hangman really doesn't excist. The best version of this track you can download for free : tokyo 75.5.1 There is no such thing as a acetate or studio recording within the archives or in the hamds of queenfans/ privatecollectors. This is a rumour and for sure a false rumour. Though I really hope more trident tracks of unknown songs like Polar Bear, Silver Salmon will appear in the future. A very creative Queen era. |
Gaabiizz 20.03.2013 19:44 |
Thanks for this bijou! |
jabbo5150 20.03.2013 20:15 |
Thanks! |
GuitarMay 20.03.2013 23:03 |
Hey' FMH, thanks a lot, for share with us this great surprise !! and ShortSharpShock for job in the quality sound. :) |
Cruella de Vil 20.03.2013 23:21 |
Bravo! Maybe you have a new and productive career working for Queen Productions as a market appraisal officer with a keen sense of what the fans want. Who knows what's next, maybe Hammy '75 or that damn Rainbow 'project'?? Thanks!! |
FMH 20.03.2013 23:37 |
CruellaDeVille wrote: Bravo! Maybe you have a new and productive career working for Queen Productions as a market appraisal officer with a keen sense of what the fans want. Who knows what's next, maybe Hammy '75 or that damn Rainbow 'project'?? Thanks!!I hope for both gigs in this year, but wait and see |
MackMantilla 21.03.2013 00:48 |
wow, this is fantastic! thanks a million :) |
A Word In Your Ear 21.03.2013 03:56 |
Thanks For This.. |
ColMan 21.03.2013 05:20 |
Very nice. Thanks for sharing! :-) |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 21.03.2013 06:17 |
Thank you so very much, FMH! Good job, ShortSharpShock! Cheers, Ogre- |
IanR 21.03.2013 06:22 |
A fabulous share! I recall reading that the band had a near-fruitless experience trying to re-create the feel of the De Lane Lea demo in the Trident studios: I suppose this take must have been one of the attempts that didn't make the grade. |
Vali 21.03.2013 07:04 |
wwwwoooowww !!! This is wonderful and yet another prove for the unbelievers of what we could get from the vaults ... when the now utopian anthology is released. Discovering gems like this KYA demo, or the Dreamer's Ball acoustic take, or those early versions of Football Fight and The Kiss is exciting .... and frustrating at the same time ! Many thanks FMH for sharing, and ShortSharpShock for the cleaning ! :) |
ferdy 21.03.2013 08:22 |
Warhol once said: "In the future, everybody will be world-famous for 15 minutes". |
The Real Wizard 21.03.2013 11:41 |
FMH wrote: Bought it, but please, don't ask more details, if you want more demosExactly - when people want to know details of the music you acquired with dirty hands (to be polite), blackmail them with "no more shares" ... even if you don't have anything else, which you very likely don't. You don't really want someone to tell the real story, do you? And your fake ESL is transparent. Let the mudslinging begin! |
FMH 21.03.2013 12:36 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Don't download, Don't listen, don't waste your time for posts.FMH wrote: Bought it, but please, don't ask more details, if you want more demosExactly - when people want to know details of the music you acquired with dirty hands (to be polite), blackmail them with "no more shares" ... even if you don't have anything else, which you very likely don't. You don't really want someone to tell the real story, do you? And your fake ESL is transparent. Let the mudslinging begin! Cheers! |
inu-liger 21.03.2013 17:44 |
Why is the audio slightly brickwalled? Pains me to look at the waveform in a DAW |
Gaabiizz 21.03.2013 19:34 |
link |
queenboot 22.03.2013 04:15 |
Don't download, Don't listen, don't waste your time for posts.
Cheers!
..best comment since years!!! Thank you for this track Norbert |
Sam99 22.03.2013 06:39 |
I would love to hear this, although I do wonder about the origin. Can anyone advise how to download from Sendspace and other places without getting this ilivid thing, which is basically a virus? Thanks very much |
ferdy 22.03.2013 07:21 |
people want to know more? Ok, Here's The full detailed informations. I own a Trident acetate Of The Queen debut LP, which contains this version. I did an acquisition in winter 2011 and shared The track with very few people to let listen that and compare with other known versions. I had The promise this would not have leaked to avoid any legal problem, but someone did not respect it. You can blame me for this but please consider I have The right to act as I want. The audio file uploaded here and some weeks ago on youtube is exactly The same one I created. Same acetate click, etc and same spectrum. So if someone want to receive glory for The sharing I cannot do nothing, unless have clear that it's a childish and poor behaviour. I'm ready to give all other informations about this leaking privately in case there will be some problems related to my original sharing. |
FMH 22.03.2013 07:28 |
ferdy wrote: people want to know more? Ok, Here's The full detailed informations. I own a Trident acetate Of The Queen debut LP, which contains this version. I did an acquisition in winter 2011 and shared The track with very few people to let listen that and compare with other known versions. I had The promise this would not have leaked to avoid any legal problem, but someone did not respect it. You can blame me for this but please consider I have The right to act as I want. The audio file uploaded here and some weeks ago on youtube is exactly The same one I created. Same acetate click, etc and same spectrum. So if someone want to receive glory for The sharing I cannot do nothing, unless have clear that it's a childish and poor behaviour. I'm ready to give all other informations about this leaking privately in case there will be some problems related to my original sharing.If you think that I'm thief you're wrong |
FMH 22.03.2013 07:33 |
Sam99 wrote: I would love to hear this, although I do wonder about the origin. Can anyone advise how to download from Sendspace and other places without getting this ilivid thing, which is basically a virus? Thanks very muchhere link link I hope for it can help you. |
The Real Wizard 22.03.2013 08:33 |
FMH wrote:Of course.ferdy wrote: people want to know more? Ok, Here's The full detailed informations. I own a Trident acetate Of The Queen debut LP, which contains this version. I did an acquisition in winter 2011 and shared The track with very few people to let listen that and compare with other known versions. I had The promise this would not have leaked to avoid any legal problem, but someone did not respect it. You can blame me for this but please consider I have The right to act as I want. The audio file uploaded here and some weeks ago on youtube is exactly The same one I created. Same acetate click, etc and same spectrum. So if someone want to receive glory for The sharing I cannot do nothing, unless have clear that it's a childish and poor behaviour. I'm ready to give all other informations about this leaking privately in case there will be some problems related to my original sharing.If you think that I'm thief you're wrong The person who spent the big bucks on the acetate is always wrong, and the person who did nothing except hide behind a moniker to play Robinhood and upload a file is a saint who can do no wrong. Give people a bit more credit. They're not as stupid as you think. |
The Real Wizard 22.03.2013 08:39 |
But now that the cat's out of the bag... A piece of previously unknown Queen history is here: All the other tracks on the acetate are identical to the debut album, which means the band weren't happy with Keep Yourself Alive as it was. It is clearly the last track they finished for the album. The acetate can therefore be reasonably dated as early 1972, and the studio version of KYA can possibly be dated as late as June 1972. So the stories of there being 4 or 5 studio versions of the song are indeed true. |
MAYniac91 22.03.2013 15:10 |
Thanks for the perfect "demo"share ! |
The Real Wizard 23.03.2013 11:24 |
The Real Wizard wrote: But now that the cat's out of the bag... A piece of previously unknown Queen history is here: All the other tracks on the acetate are identical to the debut album, which means the band weren't happy with Keep Yourself Alive as it was. It is clearly the last track they finished for the album. The acetate can therefore be reasonably dated as early 1972, and the studio version of KYA can possibly be dated as late as June 1972. So the stories of there being 4 or 5 studio versions of the song are indeed true.The fact that not a single person was interested in discussing the evolution of Keep Yourself Alive and the debut album means this place is all but dead. People just come to grab music and leave, almost like it's a dogmatic interest in the "feeling" of getting new things without actually caring about what it is. That makes this more like stamp collecting than a keen interest in understanding where the music came from. In fact, when the latest Queen remasters came out in 2011, some people actually complained that the studio outtakes of songs like Football Fight and Sail Away Sweet Sister weren't good enough for them, despite having yearned and begged for such things for years. If an early version of Dazed And Confused were to emerge with even just a different vocal track, the Zeppelin forums would have had ten pages of discussion dissecting every single note of it by now. This is a completely different version of Keep Yourself Alive capturing it half way between the De Lane Lea demo and the album version, and not a word about it. This is akin to the scientific community discovering a fossil of homo erectus from a period previously unexplored. Those folks would be declaring a national holiday. Maybe it's just what the culture of Queen fans has evolved to become, or perhaps anyone who would have had something to say doesn't post here for the reasons I've mentioned above. Either way, it's a sad state of affairs. If anyone from QP is watching, what impetus is there to release a boxed set if a gem like this leaks out and there is so little reaction? If the hardcore niche of fans doesn't care, why would the man on the street? He's happy with the Greatest Hits album and the We Will Rock You musical. Brian May knows this better than anyone, and that's why the re-releases and the musical are a great success. It's been a good decade overall, and methinks it's time to hang up the gloves. |
Vali 23.03.2013 13:53 |
Agree 100% with your post, Bob. I so much would love this forum to be a place of music discussion, most specially when pieces like this KYA version or anything of similar interest show up all of a sudden, whatever the origin is I guess that very few of us here have a real interest on discussing and dissecting such a gem, compare it with other versions, etc etc .... and perhaps many of that reduced group with real interest may have a musical background, I don't know. I've recently put some distance between QZ and I just because the lack of topics going in the direction you suggest. And sadly I don't think this situation will be changing soon. As you've already mentioned, the lack of enthusiasm and subsequent discussion I've noticed when alternative versions of The Kiss, Football Fight or Dreamer's Ball have been released is alarming, at least for a freak like me, who enjoys so much of any variation of any song I love. That's the most fascinating aspect of the creative process, to me. But unfortunately this part may not appeal many QZers. |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 23.03.2013 14:39 |
One collects Queen records , the other Queen pins and badges. One buys official releases , the other downloads pirates for free. One is a die hard collector , the other is satisfied with the cd catalogue. One finds it very interesting to know the origin of this version , the other only wants to listnen to it and is happy to hear something new. And doesn't care if it was recorded it in 72,73 or in 75. Are you the one or the other ? We cannot blame people for being different. Or expect a question and discussion beause one thinks it should happen. |
FMH 23.03.2013 14:46 |
ghostwithasmile wrote: One collects Queen records , the other Queen pins and badges. One buys official releases , the other downloads pirates for free. One is a die hard collector , the other is satisfied with the cd catalogue. One finds it very interesting to know the origin of this version , the other only wants to listnen to it and is happy to hear something new. And doesn't care if it was recorded it in 72,73 or in 75. Are you the one or the other ? We cannot blame people for being different. Or expect a question and discussion beause one thinks it should happen.far better download and just listen. No more question no more answers just enjoy |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 23.03.2013 14:51 |
^^ that said, this is a interesting take. And I agree time goes on, people like new bands each and everyday. The Queenfan base is getting thinner by the minute. And this version is nothing compared to the vast archive. But be aware whatever I would like to be released , how much I would love Demo's snd new takes... Queen is BM and RT and those are living in the present and not in the past! For them Queen is the Musical, projects with young artists, new projects etc.etc. They don't carr if you see a dvd of Paris 79 on your tv. Why would they care : the project will cost probably more than it will gain. And if they are interested in a project like e.g. Rainbow , the project gets posponed as soon as a new project comes by : like recording a album with AL , playing with GaGa etc.etc. |
FMH 23.03.2013 14:57 |
ghostwithasmile wrote: ^^ that said, this is a interesting take. And I agree time goes on, people like new bands each and everyday. The Queenfan base is getting thinner by the minute. And this version is nothing compared to the vast archive. But be aware whatever I would like to be released , how much I would love Demo's snd new takes... Queen is BM and RT and those are living in the present and not in the past! For them Queen is the Musical, projects with young artists, new projects etc.etc. They don't carr if you see a dvd of Paris 79 on your tv. Why would they care : the project will cost probably more than it will gain. And if they are interested in a project like e.g. Rainbow , the project gets posponed as soon as a new project comes by : like recording a album with AL , playing with GaGa etc.etc.All I want is Rainbow now |
A Word In Your Ear 23.03.2013 15:08 |
I miss JSS & GB's Spats. The best discussions were always started about their archive views. We miss you John, please come back!!!! |
tcc 23.03.2013 23:18 |
The Real Wizard wrote: The fact that not a single person was interested in discussing the evolution of Keep Yourself Alive and the debut album means this place is all but dead. People just come to grab music and leave, almost like it's a dogmatic interest in the "feeling" of getting new things without actually caring about what it is. That makes this more like stamp collecting than a keen interest in understanding where the music came from. In fact, when the latest Queen remasters came out in 2011, some people actually complained that the studio outtakes of songs like Football Fight and Sail Away Sweet Sister weren't good enough for them, despite having yearned and begged for such things for years. If an early version of Dazed And Confused were to emerge with even just a different vocal track, the Zeppelin forums would have had ten pages of discussion dissecting every single note of it by now. This is a completely different version of Keep Yourself Alive capturing it half way between the De Lane Lea demo and the album version, and not a word about it. This is akin to the scientific community discovering a fossil of homo erectus from a period previously unexplored. Those folks would be declaring a national holiday. Maybe it's just what the culture of Queen fans has evolved to become, or perhaps anyone who would have had something to say doesn't post here for the reasons I've mentioned above. Either way, it's a sad state of affairs. If anyone from QP is watching, what impetus is there to release a boxed set if a gem like this leaks out and there is so little reaction? If the hardcore niche of fans doesn't care, why would the man on the street? He's happy with the Greatest Hits album and the We Will Rock You musical. Brian May knows this better than anyone, and that's why the re-releases and the musical are a great success. It's been a good decade overall, and methinks it's time to hang up the gloves.Please do not be discouraged. Not all of us are gifted musicians who can discern the subtleties. I enjoy reading the reviews and opinions of those who do and bother to write it for people to know. |
tassilo 24.03.2013 05:15 |
Thanks a lot for this one! |
soxtalon 24.03.2013 06:29 |
I for one am someone who really is interested in any tidbit of news about how KYA (and anything else evolved)! I don't talk much, but I take everything in. I won't comment on the thief/robin hood stuff other than to say people should always keep their word in their dealings. No one wins with a splintered fanbase. On the other hand I'm not going to lie and say I'm not extremely excited when things leak. I loved hearing this KYA and have been listening on repeat trying to catch all the nuances especially at the end.... |
Double-U 24.03.2013 14:12 |
Thank you for sharing this jewel. for serious discussions it's more interesting what John Deacon is doing actually or why Queen didn't spent more money for the animation of the A Kind Of Magic clip. You have to understand... regards, W. |
Holly2003 25.03.2013 08:15 |
The Real Wizard wrote: If anyone from QP is watching, what impetus is there to release a boxed set if a gem like this leaks out and there is so little reaction? If the hardcore niche of fans doesn't care, why would the man on the street? He's happy with the Greatest Hits album and the We Will Rock You musical. ________________________________________________________________________________ As I've said previously, Queen Productions may well have missed the boat on a box set of rarities. After a decade or so of re-releases, many fans have drifted off and others are jaded. After all, there's only so much bullshit one can take about "flooding the market" before becoming disillusioned. The "there's no demand" argument is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. |
Ghostwithasmile is BACK! 25.03.2013 09:19 |
Holly2003 wrote:^^^^^^The Real Wizard wrote: If anyone from QP is watching, what impetus is there to release a boxed set if a gem like this leaks out and there is so little reaction? If the hardcore niche of fans doesn't care, why would the man on the street? He's happy with the Greatest Hits album and the We Will Rock You musical. ________________________________________________________________________________ As I've said previously, Queen Productions may well have missed the boat on a box set of rarities. After a decade or so of re-releases, many fans have drifted off and others are jaded. After all, there's only so much bullshit one can take about "flooding the market" before becoming disillusioned. The "there's no demand" argument is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Hehe it is like a marriage : you will have good times and bad times... staying faithfull is hard in bad times ;-) |
inu-liger 25.03.2013 13:41 |
ghostwithasmile wrote:Amen to that!Holly2003 wrote:^^^^^^ Hehe it is like a marriage : you will have good times and bad times... staying faithfull is hard in bad times ;-)The Real Wizard wrote: If anyone from QP is watching, what impetus is there to release a boxed set if a gem like this leaks out and there is so little reaction? If the hardcore niche of fans doesn't care, why would the man on the street? He's happy with the Greatest Hits album and the We Will Rock You musical. ________________________________________________________________________________ As I've said previously, Queen Productions may well have missed the boat on a box set of rarities. After a decade or so of re-releases, many fans have drifted off and others are jaded. After all, there's only so much bullshit one can take about "flooding the market" before becoming disillusioned. The "there's no demand" argument is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. |
jabbo5150 25.03.2013 19:18 |
I think it's a cool version, personally. I like the acoustic guitars and differences like the drums coming in (seemingly) slightly earlier. It is a nice transition version between the De Lane Lea demo and the final product. Love hearing stuff like this. More vocal ad libs during the drum solo part too. |
M.M. 26.03.2013 07:01 |
As per queenpedia.com Trident acetate Of The Queen debut LP also contains other songs like Hangman, Rock'n'roll, Jesus. It would be very kind of you Mr. FMH if you also share other stuff. To all queen fans will dreams come true except ferdy. |
The Real Wizard 26.03.2013 11:17 |
M.M. wrote: As per queenpedia.com Trident acetate Of The Queen debut LP also contains other songs like Hangman, Rock'n'roll, Jesus. It would be very kind of you Mr. FMH if you also share other stuff. To all queen fans will dreams come true except ferdy.As per one of the posts written above by someone who has heard the entire acetate, that is completely untrue. And what do you mean by "except Ferdy" ? Are trolling the person who PAID FOR the song that your ungrateful ears just got to hear for free? What an absolute disgrace this place is, when trolls can slag off contributing members like this with impunity. And since very few people actually speak up against this kind of thing - the rest of you deserve exactly what you get. Very sad to see what this once great place has become. |
. 26.03.2013 11:34 |
I can accept the fact that the buyer of the acetate is a tad upset this track has leaked. But lets not forget the fact this transfer was intentionally clipped anyway, in hindsight a rather good move perhaps. |
The Real Wizard 26.03.2013 11:48 |
It actually wasn't intentional. Come to think of it, if robinhoods want to take credit for "their" overblown transfers, then great - we'll go with that. A clean transfer thankfully didn't change hands. |
aristide1 26.03.2013 12:14 |
You didn't get it. The track is prepared for the next remasters. That's why the dynamic range is less than 3. |
. 26.03.2013 13:22 |
The Real Wizard wrote: It actually wasn't intentional.If it wasn't deliberate it was careless! It's not like playing vinyl is it? |
MackMantilla 27.03.2013 11:49 |
When I first listened to this leaked track, I thought it would be an earlier take circa De Lane Lea demos, because of the arragements. But now it has been cleared that comes from the Trident acetate. So there's a big diference and work between this version and the one that made it to the official release. |
MackMantilla 27.03.2013 11:51 |
In my opinion, the intro works better on electric guitars than acoustic ones :p and the drum solo from this acetate version almost sounds to me like Roger were joking about that.. |
M.M. 27.03.2013 17:54 |
Dear Real Wizard, do not take my post so seriously.I was just wondering if other acetate stuff really exist. Queenpedia is source where not all info are really true and acetate stuff is another confirmation of it. Was just wondering about your reply. |
dysan 30.03.2013 04:33 |
A facinating leak. Sounds rather crudely edited (before the drum solo for example) like the shorter 'long lost retake' edit. The instrumentation here sounds far more like the other debut recordings like Jesus for example, that might be the rather lumpy acoustic playing and slightly proggy feel. Whatever that is. Got to agree with the Real Wiz about the discussion. I know that I personally got bored. Glad I came back and found this gem. Well done all involved, however shady :o) |
thefallenqueen 30.03.2013 15:09 |
Thanks for sharing, I rarely come back to this forum as it has become boring and "periodic". People come and grab and don't feel the need to say thank you! I'm very excited about this leak which does not mean I'll have to flip out completely to show the guys at QP that the real Queen fan is still interested in rarities. I'm totally fed up with all the re-re-re-releases and Greatest Hits, Queen Rocks, Deep Cuts etc. compilations. I'll get excited when the Antholy has finally been release, not before! |
dysan 30.03.2013 16:20 |
Agreed - but I know deep down I was very happy with the 2011 reissues. 2 Years ago? Surely not? |
BETA215 15.07.2014 05:29 |
Reupload of this demo and ex+ quality Cool Cat demo please??? |