| . 17.03.2013 05:36 |
As requested. link |
| bootLuca 17.03.2013 06:03 |
thank you but the file doesn't exist! |
| Chief Mouse 17.03.2013 06:35 |
"The file does not exist, access is limited or has been removed due to copyright infringement." - translated from Russian. Could you please upload on another server? Much appreciated. |
| . 17.03.2013 07:04 |
Try again, link works. |
| Chief Mouse 17.03.2013 07:30 |
The link works now. Thank you! Cheers. |
| fr1986 17.03.2013 13:52 |
Hello, just sent you a p.m |
| The Real Wizard 17.03.2013 15:03 |
Thanks a lot ! This is an upgrade to what I had. |
| ColMan 18.03.2013 06:02 |
Thanks! It was really nice clip :-) |
| on my way up 18.03.2013 13:19 |
Thanks a lot! Been ages since I watched this and remember being stunned by Freddie's mindblowing vocal performance. Let's see whether I still feel the same about it:-) |
| Mr.QueenFan 18.03.2013 19:46 |
Thanks for sharing this Kurgan. The quallity is fantastic, and Freddie's voice is excellent in this clip. Really appreciated. |
| Gregsynth 18.03.2013 20:34 |
Definitely the best version of One Vision! |
| GuitarMay 18.03.2013 23:23 |
Thanks Kurgan, it's awesome !! |
| vivaqueen 19.03.2013 14:36 |
MERCI BEAUCOUP |
| pittrek 19.03.2013 14:53 |
Quality is fantastic ? Really ? Give me an hour ... |
| pittrek 19.03.2013 15:20 |
Alright people let me know what do you think about this version : link I personally think it's better and I'm surprised that so many people have seen only crappy versions or none at all. |
| . 19.03.2013 17:44 |
Surely you know by now how the system works Peter. If you have a better copy share it by all means. I only shared my version because I was asked to and it's the best I had. I couldn't see any other version shared on here. Why didn't you share yours before now? I'm kind of reluctant to share anything on here these days. |
| The Real Wizard 19.03.2013 22:34 |
Well, if just a few people share everything in our collections - we'd never leave the house ! So it's great when everyone picks up the slack and makes it more of a team effort. Thanks for chiming in. |
| pittrek 20.03.2013 01:27 |
The Kurgan wrote: Surely you know by now how the system works Peter. If you have a better copy share it by all means. I only shared my version because I was asked to and it's the best I had. I couldn't see any other version shared on here. Why didn't you share yours before now? I'm kind of reluctant to share anything on here these days.Sorry Mark, but I had no idea that this is "rare" or something. To be honest, I thought that my version looks pretty bad. I have shared it here only because I think it looks better than yours. Please share here stuff you have, in the case I will find out that I have a better looking copy I can share it anytime, what do you think ? Your Argentinian sample looks great BTW :-) |
| . 20.03.2013 05:03 |
That's not what I was getting at actually, the video is not rare but was merely unavailable on here until now. What I meant to imply was my reluctance to share anything not considered an upgrade. Or even if perhaps it just hasn't been shared before but is not exactly 'pristine'. A lot of my collection is still on tape, I estimate video at plus sixty hours and audio perhaps double that. Much of it recorded by myself from TV and radio or received in trades long ago from a galaxy far far away. Sometimes I get the urge to transfer something and although the machines I use to play back on are old, they are well maintained and were top of the range in their day so the results are often quite good, but not comparable to today's standards of course. I have found that DVD recorders have also improved greatly over the past few years, and some earlier transfers I made can be improved upon quite dramatically for this reason alone. This is my chosen method of transfer, rather than straight to a PC. That's because I am old school I suppose. The trouble is people on here are quite scathing and I accept that. The simple fact is I probably share less than I do because of it. That and the fact that over a thousand posts I made on here (including many shares) disappeared without explanation! Having said that I will always try to help out if anyone wants something in particular, that's because I know the feeling. |
| on my way up 20.03.2013 11:09 |
The Kurgan wrote: That's not what I was getting at actually, the video is not rare but was merely unavailable on here until now. What I meant to imply was my reluctance to share anything not considered an upgrade. Or even if perhaps it just hasn't been shared before but is not exactly 'pristine'. A lot of my collection is still on tape, I estimate video at plus sixty hours and audio perhaps double that. Much of it recorded by myself from TV and radio or received in trades long ago from a galaxy far far away. Sometimes I get the urge to transfer something and although the machines I use to play back on are old, they are well maintained and were top of the range in their day so the results are often quite good, but not comparable to today's standards of course. I have found that DVD recorders have also improved greatly over the past few years, and some earlier transfers I made can be improved upon quite dramatically for this reason alone. This is my chosen method of transfer, rather than straight to a PC. That's because I am old school I suppose. The trouble is people on here are quite scathing and I accept that. The simple fact is I probably share less than I do because of it. That and the fact that over a thousand posts I made on here (including many shares) disappeared without explanation! Having said that I will always try to help out if anyone wants something in particular, that's because I know the feeling.Well, in my opinion any share is wonderful. I truly admire the fact people - like you or Peter or Bob (who are of my age) or any other person who shares stuff here or elsewhere - take the time to transfer (or just upload) old stuff they have for us "young Queen-fans" (I'm 27 myself) to enjoy. I for one enjoy each and every share (even the ones I don't "grab"), I truly mean that. Actually, the old stuff you have on tapes is even more interesting because there might be unheard/unseen stuff in it or an upgrade to what's circulating. But even if it's not an upgrade, it can still be worthwhile... I feel your generation (I don't want you to feel old though:-):-) - the people who actually were around and trading when Queen was an active band with Freddie - has lots to offer and they're not (too) active here on QZ, which I truly regret. |
| The Real Wizard 20.03.2013 11:32 |
The Kurgan wrote: The trouble is people on here are quite scathing and I accept that.Be the change you wish you see in the world. Drown out the bad with good. |
| . 20.03.2013 11:38 |
|
| Mr.QueenFan 20.03.2013 18:59 |
Don't worry about that Kurgan, if you share the best quality you have you shoudn't worry about what other people think. I'll take one of these videos of Queen any day. But you raise an interesting question that i was about to point when i first downloaded your video. I believe that Queen or QP are intimidated by today's picture standards, and that is why i doubt that gems like these will ever make it to a Queen DVD, wich in my opinion is wrong, becuase in Queen's case the music will allways sell. I'm from the VHS period, and i must admit that the last 10 years were tremendous in the advance of technology, specially video. I remember the other day i was in a store and they were playng the BluRay of a live concert by Adele. Man, what a picture! The definition was superb, you could see her hair so clearly, it was just an experience for me (i don't own a BluRay). And then i thought about Queen, and what they must be feeling towards this. Back in the day, they used the best technology they could and it was perfect back then, but for todays standars, only the ones filmed with cinema cameras stand the test. But i don't think this should be a reason for them not to include gems like the one you've uploaded on their releases. Who cares if it isn't HD? On my part, i really appreciate your uploads. Thanks! |
| on my way up 23.03.2013 02:53 |
Thanks to this upload I listened to this show again: WHAT A SMOKING HOT PERFORMANCE!! A concert as it should be! |
| bootLuca 23.03.2013 03:07 |
ssssshhhhh! it could be the next dvd released by QP! ;-) |
| on my way up 23.03.2013 03:14 |
bootLuca wrote: ssssshhhhh! it could be the next dvd released by QP! ;-)Hahaha:-) I can imagine someone from QPL surfing on here, reading my comment and then reporting to the bosses that releasing another 1986 show is a good idea since there's still demand for it from the die-hards:-):-) |
| tassilo 24.03.2013 05:31 |
Thanks a lot! |
| DepeX 23.04.2014 03:34 |
Can anybody reupload it? Thanks |
| BETA215 23.04.2014 19:05 |
pittrek wrote: Alright people let me know what do you think about this version : link I personally think it's better and I'm surprised that so many people have seen only crappy versions or none at all.Pittrek, please, can you re-upload your version, if it's the best, or if not, the Kurgan's version? |
| Chief Mouse 24.04.2014 07:04 |
Kurgan's version - https://mega.co.nz/#!rNcWABIT!6FzGeBMk4BxqjXXJJrtCPhB-gLvblQiswfElfLTAauI Pittrek's version - https://mega.co.nz/#!eZNXjDRD!HSqeSlneTN_b2CS_TnjlMe5veZ4VV2QcasvEY6m9z4s |
| pittrek 24.04.2014 08:28 |
Thanks Mr. Mouse |
| DepeX 24.04.2014 09:26 |
BTW, Mr Mouse, can you upload again the video from Mannheim? Thanks a lot in advance |
| BETA215 24.04.2014 16:10 |
Thanks a lot Chief Mouse! |
| Barry Durex 28.05.2016 15:17 |
This one on youtube is different to the link in the opening post. |
| The Real Wizard 28.05.2016 17:43 |
The dip in quality is bizarre. |
| Barry Durex 29.05.2016 02:46 |
The Real Wizard wrote: The dip in quality is bizarre.Where is dip? |
| Nitroboy 29.05.2016 09:40 |
Barry Durex wrote:The Real Wizard wrote: The dip in quality is bizarre.Where is dip? Right at the beginning |
| Barry Durex 29.05.2016 18:03 |
Of the youtube clip or vob file? |
| The Real Wizard 29.05.2016 19:43 |
Barry Durex wrote: Of the youtube clip or vob file?I guess both? Talking about the audio. It makes me wonder if the bit was mixed in from another show. There's an obvious cross-fade. |
| Barry Durex 30.05.2016 02:08 |
The Real Wizard wrote:I guess the audio could be from one of the two listed on your site as they only a have C+ or B- rating.Barry Durex wrote: Of the youtube clip or vob file?I guess both? Talking about the audio. It makes me wonder if the bit was mixed in from another show. There's an obvious cross-fade. |
| . 30.05.2016 02:57 |
The YouTube clip might not contain the actual TV broadcast audio, but I'm sure it's from the correct show. The YouTube (video) fades are due to a glitch with the original vob file. This is the audio from the TV broadcast, although it is not a ''lossless'' wav file. You will just here the TV announcer for a split second at the very end. link |
| Nitroboy 30.05.2016 04:41 |
The Real Wizard wrote:Barry Durex wrote: Of the youtube clip or vob file?I guess both? Talking about the audio. It makes me wonder if the bit was mixed in from another show. There's an obvious cross-fade. Considering the audio matches the video, and we have an audience recording of this show - no way in hell is it from another show ;) |
| . 30.05.2016 05:35 |
Is the wav file I uploaded any better? |
| The Real Wizard 30.05.2016 13:09 |
Nitroboy wrote:But of course. Indeed, that guitar feedback is there on the audience tape.The Real Wizard wrote:Considering the audio matches the video, and we have an audience recording of this show - no way in hell is it from another show ;)Barry Durex wrote: Of the youtube clip or vob file?I guess both? Talking about the audio. It makes me wonder if the bit was mixed in from another show. There's an obvious cross-fade. |
| . 08.06.2016 06:08 |
So what's the verdict on the wav file, does it also have the dip in quality? |
| Jake12 17.10.2016 00:15 |
Kurgan could you be kind enough to re upload the YouTube version? |