Gilead's HIV pill could be market leader in 3-5 years: J.P. Morgan
J.P. Morgan Securities raised its price target on Gilead Sciences Inc to $75 from $70, saying the company's HIV pill could emerge as a "market leader" in three to five years, sending the drugmaker's shares to a life-high.
expects Stribild sales of about $2.9 billion in 2015, ahead of Wall Street consensus of $1.5 billion. link
BBC News - JP Morgan Chase settles US mortgage fraud case
JP Morgan Chase has agreed to pay $153.6m (£94.6m) to settle charges that it misled the buyers of complex mortgage investments as the US housing market link
june 20, 2011
JP Morgan Chase sued - for FRAUD - Again !!!
(2) Major Lawsuits seek close to $ 1 BILLION DOLLARS
Mounting evidence of outrageous behaviour and even more examples of outright FRAUD (committed by JP Morgan Chase?) has become so overwhelming & obvious, that soon, we'll need "State Scorecards" to track the sheer volume and huge numbers ...of lawsuits... being filed against JP Morgan Chase. link
Another possibility is that HIV doesn't have anything to do with AIDS. This is what Peter Duesberg of UC Berkeley has been saying for five years: that HIV doesn't attack the immune system, doesn't cause AIDS, and is in fact harmless. A professor of molecular biology, Duesberg is one of the world's leading experts on retroviruses. I called him at his Berkeley lab and asked what he thought of the news from Amsterdam, and the possibility that we may now have one more lethal virus to worry about.
"How many different viruses are we going to have that all evolved in the last ten years and all cause the same disease?" Duesberg asked. "Viruses have been around for billions of years and now they're coming out for the latest AIDS conference."
Duesberg is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and was the first to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. He is not popular with the National Institutes of Health, the government agency that has been funding and policing AIDS research for the last decade. For years he was supported by an NIH "outstanding investigator" grant, but after he attacked the HIV theory of AIDS, his grant was cut off.
COULD DUESBERG BE RIGHT?
By Tom Bethell
National Review 17 Aug. 1992
Being that I've seen some absolutely terrible moderated forums before, QZ's largely unmoderated approach works a lot better than one might give it credit for.
But the fact that this prick hasn't been banned/blocked/whatever yet is a joke.