I ASK MYSELF WHAT THE HELL IS THE POINT OF ADAM LAMBERT
MINCING AROUND WITH A TOP BRITISH ROCK GROUP LIKE QUEEN?
WHAT IS THE POINT, QUEEN FANS DONT WANNA SEE HIM, AND I WOULD NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS BUY ANYTHING WITH HIS NAME ON IT.
I HAVNT BEEN REMOTELY INTERESTED IN QUEEN SINCE FREDDIE PASSED AWAY, COS THEY KEEP ON DOING SILLY THINGS, FIRSTLY WITH PAUL ROGERS AND NOW WITH ADAM LAMBERT, AND WHAT THE HELL WAS BRIAN MAY DOING WITH DAPPY?
THE QUEEN MACHINE IS GOING GA GA!
I WILL HOWEVER BE BUYING THE NEW FREDDIE, GREAT PRETENDER BOOK AND BLUE RAY DVD.
I AM AN ARDENT QUEEN FAN, AND ONLY THE BEST IS GOOD ENOUGH
FOR ME, REAL QUEEN MERCHANDISE.
GERRY, HARTLEPOOL UK.
Just check the queenonline.com posts. Everybody who posts there seems to be an Adam Lambert megafan. There are a few people who dared to claim he's not good as a singer for Queen, and they all have been labelled as homophobes and "haters".
It seems that we who don't like this collaboration are a minority.
But anyway, this is the "Sharing the music - announce" forum, not the "General discussion" forum
WELL STANLEY FIRSTLY BEEN GAY IS NOT AN ILLNESS,
AND SO AS YOU PUT IT "IM CURED" MAY HAVE BEEN
BECAUSE YOU WERE NOT GAY TO START WITH ONLY CURIOUS.
OR MAYBE..... YOUR A GREEDY BI SEXUAL WHO WANTS EVERYTHING THAT MOVES, HA HA
Well Gerry did you go and see the Hammersmith shows ?If you had you would have seen a great show with the crowd going nuts ! Of course Freddie was best,but the music lives on.
What do you mean you are an ardent Queen fan, does this make you more knowledgable than everyone else and can decide who they can sing with, do you own the band?
gerry wrote:
WELL STANLEY FIRSTLY BEEN GAY IS NOT AN ILLNESS,
AND SO AS YOU PUT IT "IM CURED" MAY HAVE BEEN
BECAUSE YOU WERE NOT GAY TO START WITH ONLY CURIOUS.
OR MAYBE..... YOUR A GREEDY BI SEXUAL WHO WANTS EVERYTHING THAT MOVES, HA HA
I was just kidding Gerry HAHA ;)
I'm not gay nor bisexual but maybe greedy (?)
To all whos replied to my thread, no i dont own the band, but bri and rog sell themselves short
performing with someone who has barley the experience to sing a queen song in tune.
yes the audience at hammersmith probably were singing louder than lambert, cos hes a weak singer
and doesnt have the amazing vocal range of Mercury. pEOPLE CAN SEE WHO EVER THEY WANT TO,
i was just merely saying i and i alone dont know what all the hype is about regarding this cheap karaoke lambert singer, but i aint stupid and wont be sucked in to it.
Freddie Mercury is king Mercury and thats how it stays for me! why have beefburger when you can have steak! Gerry.
Well, lemme know where you can get that steak cause Freddie's dead. Queen has some of the best music and never getting to see them live with Freddie and John I'm GLAD they brought back the band with Adam Lambert. He's a hell of a singer in my opinion, missing Freddie's range by 1/2 an octave on the top end. Freddie himself could not sing his full four octave vocal range live because of his throat problems, he often dropped down to sing the middle part or harmonize. Adam is campy like Freddie, has incredible range and power like Freddie. Only Freddie can sing like himself, but Queen is damn good with Adam Lambert and he puts on a fun show without trying to be anything but himself. Queen + AL just rocked 35 sold out shows in N.A. Asia, NZ & AU and those fans would completely disagree with you.
