Michael Allred 24.05.2012 08:59 |
Adam Lambert's second album "Trespassing" has debuted at #1 on the US Billboard charts (so much for the shots some have taken at his flash in the pan status) but most importantly Lambert becomes the first openly gay artist to debut at #1 in history. It will be interesting to see how it fares in Europe. |
Rubbersuit 24.05.2012 11:47 |
Michael Allred wrote: It will be interesting to see how it fares in Europe.No it won't |
GratefulFan 24.05.2012 13:04 |
His flash in the pan status remains unresolved at the moment. 77,000 copies were sold, a figure about which Billboard noted: "Trespassing's" 77,000 start is the smallest sum at No. 1 on the chart since the tally dated Aug. 20, 2011, when Adele's "21" sold 76,000 in its 12th nonconsecutive week atop the list. "Trespassing" has the smallest sales week for a No. 1 debut since Amos Lee's "Mission Bell" started in the penthouse with 40,000 on the Feb. 12, 2011 chart. In other words, he's extraordinarily lucky he's running with a weak pack at the moment. But more importantly, who were these 77,000 copies sold to? There was and is a relentless campaign by the 'Glamberts' to manipulate his chart positions for the album and singles through mass, coordinated, multiple purchases, gifting and donating of CDs. Highly organized on all social media and on a dedicated website called adamlambertstorm.com Here's just a little of their manifesto: GOAL Week 1 - #1 At Billboard HOT 100! Pull up a chair, cause we're gonna be at #1 for awhile! IMPORTANT TO NOTE Gifting downloads to Charities is not an Option. When the album is released we can donate hard copies to charities from Amazon! WHY Until the "casual fan" downloads begin, and radio play kicks in, it's the Hard Core Fan Base that needs to drive the sales to get BTIKM to #1 at Billboard! Then the buzz and promo will begin to drive the sales! HOW Open an iTunes Account - You may have more than one iTunes account per computer. Each account needs a different email address. You may use the same credit card. Definition of Sale? Sale = Any Download That Is Charged To Your Credit Card or Pay Pal. In the USA, to count as a sale, you can only download BTIKM once per iTune account. If you try to download again, you will receive a message that you have already downloaded that song. They are happy to download that song for you again for Free, but guess what? Free does not = sale!!! So, what to do? You want to download songs and iTunes won't let you! Dang! Gifting! Yes, now you start Gifting to folks who.... * Have an iTunes account in the same country you live in. * Are aware that they are receiving a download from you, and will download the Gift of BTIKM within a day or two. How many times can you Gift? As many times as possible, to as many people as possible....Consult your bank account and budget! To Gift, go to iTunes and find BTIKM. Right next to "Buy" is a downward arrow. This is a drop-down menu. Pull the menu down and click on Gift. Follow iTunes directions from there. If you can't afford to purchase a download of BTIKM, there are many who are more than happy to Gift you a copy. You will need to have an email address and an iTunes account. You can contact us 2 ways: Method #1 - Follow @adamstormhits on Twitter. As soon as we follow you back, DM us with your request. Please give us your first name and email address. Confirm that you have an iTunes account, and that you will redeem the Gift asap. When the download is complete, please let us know! That's it! Method #2 - Join Adam Storm ~ Trespassing link Look at the Administrators Box on the right. Private Message either Oshi or Barbls if you live in the USA. Give us your first name and email address and confirm that you have an iTunes account, and that you will redeem the Gift asap. When the download is complete, please let us know. NOTE: If you are Canadian, debbielynn is the go-to-gal for Gifting! You may want to have Gifting partners from friends in the real world or from Twitter. Gifting Buddies! Multiple similar threads on the official boards and elsewhere around the internet. This is a bunch of well meaning but obsessed fans trying to run the music business from their couches. As you read up above they truly believe that until the rest of the world sees the light on Adam they have to personally hold the torch and make him number one. Whatever it takes and however it can be done. 5, 10, 20 even 50 copies of his CD for some. It's completely, utterly bizarre. Obsession meets middle age buying power. Nobody with a shred of honesty should be in here bragging on this completely manufactured "accomplishment". |
cmsdrums 24.05.2012 14:28 |
What's his sexual preference got to do with anything? In the UK acts like Erasure, Culture Club, Marc Almond, Bronski Beat all had no 1 albums I'm sure. Besides, Freddie was actually openly gay, but because he didn't use that to define his work or career, or bang on about it, people actually almost overlooked what was right in front of them and refused to believe it. |
tero! 48531 24.05.2012 14:55 |
...Not to mention that the other points are pretty pointless as well. The least selling #1 debut since last year? Fans buying multiple copies? Wow, I guess that really proves he didn't get to #1 fairly! |
pittrek 24.05.2012 15:13 |
Just one think I can say - today's kids have no taste for music : link |
greaserkat 24.05.2012 18:14 |
cmsdrums wrote: What's his sexual preference got to do with anything? In the UK acts like Erasure, Culture Club, Marc Almond, Bronski Beat all had no 1 albums I'm sure. Besides, Freddie was actually openly gay, but because he didn't use that to define his work or career, or bang on about it, people actually almost overlooked what was right in front of them and refused to believe it.How do you know Freddie was openly gay? |
Montreux 24.05.2012 18:54 |
link |
e-man 24.05.2012 18:57 |
what has sexual preference to do with anything? anywho - 77 000? I guess the timing of release has alot to do with it then. didn't Van Halen's new album sell 200 000 and got to #2? |
*goodco* 24.05.2012 20:25 |
I'm not a fan nor basher.....but, regarding so called closet sales, Brian Epstein never ever ever influenced The Beatles chart position with any of their early releases...... |
guild93 24.05.2012 20:47 |
cmsdrums wrote: What's his sexual preference got to do with anything? In the UK acts like Erasure, Culture Club, Marc Almond, Bronski Beat all had no 1 albums I'm sure. Besides, Freddie was actually openly gay, but because he didn't use that to define his work or career, or bang on about it, people actually almost overlooked what was right in front of them and refused to believe it.Indeed, I can't see the relevance of a connection between men who like to suck penises and chart debuts |
Michael Allred 25.05.2012 07:54 |
GratefulFan wrote: His flash in the pan status remains unresolved at the moment. 77,000 copies were sold, a figure about which Billboard noted: "Trespassing's" 77,000 start is the smallest sum at No. 1 on the chart since the tally dated Aug. 20, 2011, when Adele's "21" sold 76,000 in its 12th nonconsecutive week atop the list. "Trespassing" has the smallest sales week for a No. 1 debut since Amos Lee's "Mission Bell" started in the penthouse with 40,000 on the Feb. 12, 2011 chart. In other words, he's extraordinarily lucky he's running with a weak pack at the moment. But more importantly, who were these 77,000 copies sold to? There was and is a relentless campaign by the 'Glamberts' to manipulate his chart positions for the album and singles through mass, coordinated, multiple purchases, gifting and donating of CDs. Highly organized on all social media and on a dedicated website called adamlambertstorm.com Here's just a little of their manifesto: GOAL Week 1 - #1 At Billboard HOT 100! Pull up a chair, cause we're gonna be at #1 for awhile! IMPORTANT TO NOTE Gifting downloads to Charities is not an Option. When the album is released we can donate hard copies to charities from Amazon! WHY Until the "casual fan" downloads begin, and radio play kicks in, it's the Hard Core Fan Base that needs to drive the sales to get BTIKM to #1 at Billboard! Then the buzz and promo will begin to drive the sales! HOW Open an iTunes Account - You may have more than one iTunes account per computer. Each account needs a different email address. You may use the same credit card. Definition of Sale? Sale = Any Download That Is Charged To Your Credit Card or Pay Pal. In the USA, to count as a sale, you can only download BTIKM once per iTune account. If you try to download again, you will receive a message that you have already downloaded that song. They are happy to download that song for you again for Free, but guess what? Free does not = sale!!! So, what to do? You want to download songs and iTunes won't let you! Dang! Gifting! Yes, now you start Gifting to folks who.... * Have an iTunes account in the same country you live in. * Are aware that they are receiving a download from you, and will download the Gift of BTIKM within a day or two. How many times can you Gift? As many times as possible, to as many people as possible....Consult your bank account and budget! To Gift, go to iTunes and find BTIKM. Right next to "Buy" is a downward arrow. This is a drop-down menu. Pull the menu down and click on Gift. Follow iTunes directions from there. If you can't afford to purchase a download of BTIKM, there are many who are more than happy to Gift you a copy. You will need to have an email address and an iTunes account. You can contact us 2 ways: Method #1 - Follow @adamstormhits on Twitter. As soon as we follow you back, DM us with your request. Please give us your first name and email address. Confirm that you have an iTunes account, and that you will redeem the Gift asap. When the download is complete, please let us know! That's it! Method #2 - Join Adam Storm ~ Trespassing link Look at the Administrators Box on the right. Private Message either Oshi or Barbls if you live in the USA. Give us your first name and email address and confirm that you have an iTunes account, and that you will redeem the Gift asap. When the download is complete, please let us know. NOTE: If you are Canadian, debbielynn is the go-to-gal for Gifting! You may want to have Gifting partners from friends in the real world or from Twitter. Gifting Buddies! Multiple similar threads on the official boards and elsewhere around the internet. This is a bunch of well meaning but obsessed fans trying to run the music business from their couches. As you read up above they truly believe that until the rest of the world sees the light on Adam they have to personally hold the torch and make him number one. Whatever it takes and however it can be done. 5, 10, 20 even 50 copies of his CD for some. It's completely, utterly bizarre. Obsession meets middle age buying power. Nobody with a shred of honesty should be in here bragging on this completely manufactured "accomplishment".Yup, Queen fans have never ONCE tried to manufacture sales right? How long have you been a member here? Besides, why exactly does it matter HOW a chart position is accomplished? |
Michael Allred 25.05.2012 07:56 |
e-man wrote: what has sexual preference to do with anything? anywho - 77 000? I guess the timing of release has alot to do with it then. didn't Van Halen's new album sell 200 000 and got to #2?Oh that's right, nobody cares about homosexuality any more, I forgot about that bit, especially with gays still struggling for equality. For an openly gay artist to debut at #1 is certainly something to take note of. |
Micrówave 25.05.2012 10:07 |
For an openly gay artist to debut at #1 is certainly something to take note of.Maybe, if you're gay. For the rest of us who could really care less what you do with your privates, it really doesn't matter too much. In rare circumstances, I guess it could mean something. I'm sure NBA star Rudy Gay is happy to get credit for all those jersey sales even though he's really not that good. The first Black artist... ok. The first woman... ok. These are cultural events of note. The first gay artist? Um... not so much. |
brENsKi 25.05.2012 10:30 |
have to disagree ^^^^^^ in UK law there are 9 strands of equality. gained their place as a "protected characteristic" each gained their equal rights in law through lobbying, civil rights activists and campaigns... therefore, by consequence, each Protected Characteristic is an equally important part of a person's identity... the 9 strands are: Race, Religion, Sexual orientation, gender, disability, marriage/civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, gender identity and age so none have less right to "celebrate" their status as first "mormon at no1", "bisexual on the moon" or "transgender bouncer" soapbox removed ;-) |
cmsdrums 25.05.2012 12:43 |
I'm with Microwave - without wanting to get into an argument, or start with all the 'some of my best friends are gay' lines, I just can't believe there are straight people who would hear a track(s) and like it, but then find out the artist was gay and then state that they didn't like it or not buy it based on that. Sadly however I have experienced the other way around, where a lot of gay people have raved about an artist and bought all their material, seen them live etc...even though they don't actually like their music, simply because they have been adopted as a stereotypical 'gay icon' (eg Cher, Kylie, etc etc) |
Flash Jazz 25.05.2012 13:08 |
How is this important? Doesn't matter whatsoever |
Fireplace 25.05.2012 14:12 |
Even more shocking: Lambert becomes the first artist to debut at #1 who is openly gay. |
Rubbersuit 25.05.2012 14:17 |
Elton John never debuted at #1? |
Gregsynth 25.05.2012 16:17 |
Elton John's Captain Fantastic debuted at #1! |
greaserkat 25.05.2012 16:21 |
Was Elton openly gay when it debuted at #1? |
Gregsynth 25.05.2012 16:43 |
Well, he was closeted (he didn't come out until 1988). If that's the case, then Lambert is the first "openly" gay artist to debut. |
rhyeking 25.05.2012 17:07 |
Début chart positions are nice for the artist's ego and very nice for the record company's annual bottom line, but the only real test is how well the music lasts 20 or 30 years from now. Time tends to weed out a lot of crap, like this No. 1 Hit Single from 1976: link |
GratefulFan 25.05.2012 17:21 |
I wonder who the first openly gay artist to earn a number one debut in the US will be? Does Neil Patrick Harris sing? |
Gregsynth 26.05.2012 00:01 |
Well I bought the album earlier today, and I enjoyed it! Even a Queen live concert fanatic has to enjoy something other than analyzing/researching shows :) |
Michael Allred 26.05.2012 07:39 |
Micrówave wrote:Ignorance is bliss I suppose. For you to boil down being gay to "what you do with your privates" shows you to be the complete idiot I always thought you were.For an openly gay artist to debut at #1 is certainly something to take note of.Maybe, if you're gay.For the rest of us who could really care less what you do with your privates, it really doesn't matter too much. In rare circumstances, I guess it could mean something. I'm sure NBA star Rudy Gay is happy to get credit for all those jersey sales even though he's really not that good. The first Black artist... ok. The first woman... ok. These are cultural events of note. The first gay artist? Um... not so much. |
Michael Allred 26.05.2012 07:43 |
cmsdrums wrote: I'm with Microwave - without wanting to get into an argument, or start with all the 'some of my best friends are gay' lines, I just can't believe there are straight people who would hear a track(s) and like it, but then find out the artist was gay and then state that they didn't like it or not buy it based on that. Sadly however I have experienced the other way around, where a lot of gay people have raved about an artist and bought all their material, seen them live etc...even though they don't actually like their music, simply because they have been adopted as a stereotypical 'gay icon' (eg Cher, Kylie, etc etc)Oh yeah, straight people aren't remotely homophobic enough. You know some truly enlightened people I guess. and what precisely is wrong with gay people supporting other gay artists? Why is that "sad"? |
cmsdrums 26.05.2012 11:46 |
Because they shouldn't be classed as "gay artists" and be judged on their sexuality, they should simply be "artists" and judged on their music. To my mind they are actively bracketing abd marketing themselves on their sexuality when there's no need. I fucking hate Simply Red's music and wouldn't buy their stuff just because Mick Hucknall is heterosexual like me, and I'd like to think that gay people wouldn't buy music by certain artists just because they're gay, but the fact is a lot do. Equally I love Queen's output, and it didn't matter a toss to me that Freddie was gay. |
someonewholikesadam 26.05.2012 14:50 |
Small and manipulated as you think AL's # 1 debut is, it is hugely societally significant. Just reading the posts on this forum showcases how homophobic people still are. Many will dismiss an openly gay artist's music simply because he/she is gay. And so what if I bought all 77,000 copies myself? I love him!!!! |
john bodega 27.05.2012 03:08 |
It makes a nice story, but it's a lot of shit. Freddie did more for gays just by being himself than any of these out-and-proud prancing morons ever will. It's like what Morgan Freeman says about Black History month. He doesn't think there should be one. Being neither gay or black, maybe my opinions on these two issues aren't worth much, but I defer to Freddie and Morgan - less yapping about a lot of crap that does not matter and does not involve you, and stick to your craft. Start talking about your sexuality or your ethnicity when your 'artistic' output isn't enough to carry itself. Oh look. |
Holly2003 27.05.2012 03:25 |
This can mean a lot to gay people and mean very little to everyone else. Both things can be true at the same time and it doesn't have to be one or the other. Is it a Jackie Robinson moment though? I doubt it. |
someonewholikesadam 27.05.2012 07:40 |
With all due respect, Freddie never paraded his gay lover on the red carpet or gushed about him in interviews. Adam is walkin the walk and paving the way for other gay artists not to be afraid to be who they really are in the public eye. And maybe his music is not your cup of homophobic tea but it is stellar and stands on its own merit. |
Amazon 27.05.2012 11:23 |
someonewholikesadam wrote: "Small and manipulated as you think AL's # 1 debut is, it is hugely societally significant." How so? How is it 'hugely societally significant?' I'm genuinely curious, as I don't see how it is particularly significant at all. "Just reading the posts on this forum showcases how homophobic people still are. Many will dismiss an openly gay artist's music simply because he/she is gay." Oh, please. The reason most people dismiss him is because they don't like him, it has nothing to do with homophobia. I would be interested if you could identify one post on this thread that is actually homophobic. My bet is you can't. "And so what if I bought all 77,000 copies myself? I love him!!!!" Good for you, but it doesn't mean that other people have to feel the same way about him as you. |
Amazon 27.05.2012 11:25 |
"With all due respect, Freddie never paraded his gay lover on the red carpet or gushed about him in interviews." No, but he was always himself, and it didn't take a genius to know that he probably wasn't straight. "Adam is walkin the walk and paving the way for other gay artists not to be afraid to be who they really are in the public eye." I think you're affording him far too much significance. "And maybe his music is not your cup of homophobic tea but it is stellar and stands on its own merit." Oh, please, stop with this 'homophobia' crap! I'm bi, and I've dealt with more than my fair share of homophobia in my life, and nothing annoys me more when people throw around the term as if it means nothing. If you want to know what homophobia is, listen to some of the politicians who are opposed to gay marriage because homosexuality isn't 'natural' etc... Some of their reasons for opposing gay marriage are truly disgusting and the epitome of homophobia. Describing those who dismiss him and his music, as homophobic, is not only nonsense but also extremely offensive. |
john bodega 28.05.2012 03:22 |
"With all due respect, Freddie never paraded his gay lover on the red carpet or gushed about him in interviews" Yeah. Normal people don't do that. It's sickening whelps that like red carpets that talk about their boring fuckin' love lives and assume that the world needs (or wants) to know. Freddie just stuck to what he was good at. I understand this is likely to be a problem area for Lambert. "And maybe his music is not your cup of homophobic tea" Posted on a Queen forum. Is there a mental condition behind this startlingly close-minded swill that you've been typing? |
e-man 28.05.2012 05:50 |
with all due respect; america seems to be one of the few places, apart from the middle east, where sexual orientation seems to matter a great deal. I'll never understand why anyways; I can't wait to see who will be the first latin american with one leg who tops the billboard chart in the end it comes down to the music and its longevity. I'm willing to bet alot of money that this album under the "lambert" banner will be forgotten in the not too distant future |
GratefulFan 28.05.2012 08:31 |
In fairness to someonewholikesadam it can be very difficult to hold a reasonable line against what can eventually feel like overwhelming 'opposition'. The subtleties of a score of varying but generally skeptical or negative views can be lost and seem to lump together under something convenient like 'homophobia'. Yes, it's silly to be throwing around that term on a *Queen* discussion forum, but she's generally been respectful and reasonable and supported her points with the evidence as she sees it. So I think this is maybe just a little built up frustration on her part. |
someonewholikesadam 28.05.2012 13:14 |
Thank you, Grateful Fan. Amazon and Zebonka, if you don't think people dismiss his music simply because he is gay, you have blinders. I've been dealing with this for 3 years. It is societally significant, Adam has gotten so much feedback from gay teens, their patents, etc. about how much his being out and proud has helped them in their lives. No, he doesn't HAVE to parade his gay love on the red carpet, but until this can be done without people saying that someone is a "sickening whelp" and not just view it in the same light as a man with a beautiful girl on his arm, there is still work to be done in this area in society. Homophobic comments on this thread. Hmm. Maybe you are right. But on this forum? Let me just quote you a few choice tidbits. |
john bodega 28.05.2012 13:17 |
"if you don't think people dismiss his music simply because he is gay" Never said that. You brought it up in a fashion that made it sound like it's a problem right here, on this forum - by extension, then, you're aiming it at me. You need to be aware that it's total bullshit in that instance. He's just not what I would choose to listen to, to put it politely. You're harping on about it and trying to make it about an issue that, while probably important to him, doesn't really matter to anyone who simply doesn't like his voice. Reframing the issue is a waste of time. If some people don't like him, it doesn't matter much what listeners in the Bible Belt give as their reasons for also not liking him does it? I don't care if someone switches off because he's gay. That's their own stupid problem. |
someonewholikesadam 28.05.2012 13:50 |
"Oh, please. The reason most people dismiss him is because they don't like him, it has nothing to do with homophobia." But not worth arguing over semantics. "Freddie may have been gay but AL is a "fag." "Just because Lambert is a flamboyant fag" "it really concerns me that he may try to kiss Brian. Lambert is such a pervert." Don't think these were meant to be terms of endearment. |
Amazon 28.05.2012 14:11 |
Of course I am aware that some people dismiss his music because he's gay. Just as there are people who dismiss Queen because Freddie was gay. However, you accused people on this thread of being homophobic, and to attempt to argue that you were referring to people in general, and not those in this thread, is nonsense. You were suggesting that if someone doesn't like Lambert, it's because of homophobia ("And maybe his music is not your cup of homophobic tea but it is stellar and stands on its own merit"). That you would do so is not only an attempt to silence those who disagree, but shows that you have no understanding of real homophobia. As Zeb said, just because some dislike Lambert for sinister reasons, doesn't mean the rest of us should apologise for disliking his music as well (for non-sinister reasons). GF (as usual :D) made an excellent point. You probably do feel that you, and other Lambert fans, are being hunted down. Which is not our intention. Unless you're a KISS fan, you shouldn't feel embarassed about liking anyone. Personally I don't hate him (nor do I like him). His Bo Rhap and Mad World were both terrific. Although there is no way I could ever listen to his music. Anyway you need to accept that most people who dislike him, are not homophobic. Certainly (almost) none of the people on this thread are. |
Amazon 28.05.2012 14:12 |
'But not worth arguing over semantics. "Freddie may have been gay but AL is a "fag." "Just because Lambert is a flamboyant fag" "it really concerns me that he may try to kiss Brian. Lambert is such a pervert." Don't think these were meant to be terms of endearment.' Honestly, I have no idea what you're talking about. If you're quoting from the forum, then no, I have never denied there is homophobia on QZ (Skip being the prime practitioner) however I don't see how that is relevant, since none of it is from this thread. You accused fellow QZers of being homophobic. Based on which comments? Comments made in other threads, and probably all by members who haven't posted in this thread. Completely irrelevant, and a desperate attempt to suggest that if a QZer doesn't like Lambert, it must be because they're homophobic. |
The Real Wizard 28.05.2012 14:36 |
Shoe on the other foot.. If I were gay and I didn't like Led Zeppelin, would that mean I don't like heterosexual people? When put like that, both arguments are just ludicrous. |
someonewholikesadam 28.05.2012 14:51 |
Only if they dismissed Zeppelin BECAUSE they were hetero. And I clarified that there were no homophobic comments on this thread, just this forum. (the comments above we're direct quotes from QZ) I came to this forum out of curiosity. When it was first announced that Adam would perform with Queen at S'phere, I read comment after comment on Queen's official Facebook page that completely sickened me. And someone posted "You should see what they are posting at QZ." and that's how I came here. So I'm sorry to lump everyone together here at QZ. My mistake. But on our AL forums we never disparage any other artist (or human being for that matter) with the intensity that I have seen from many Queen fans. So if you are not homophobic or just dislike Adam's music because it doesn't suit your tastes, my apologies. It's just that the fandom as a whole comes across as a bunch of ignorant, foul-mouthed people. present company excluded. |
someonewholikesadam 28.05.2012 14:53 |
P.S. Maybe many of the members in this forum are not from the U.S. and don't quote grasp the depths of hoopobia in this country where many would not consider listening to someone music just because they are a "flamer." |
brENsKi 28.05.2012 16:24 |
ffs ^^^^^ you're talkign about small parts of america.....stop trying to imply the whole country is homophobic....that's like saying they're all morbidly obese, eat nothing but pancakes and drive pickups you seem to overlook that in 50% of the last 25 years elections you've elected democrats - and even one of the republican presidents didn't actually win...america is much more liberated than you'd have us believe...stop bemoaning what's wrong with your country and celebrate the advances you've made and the pioneering steps you have taken to lead the world |
someonewholikesadam 28.05.2012 18:57 |
Oh my gosh! Keep your blinders on if you wish. I like to believe that I live in a fairly cosmopolitan area of the country being right in between Philadelphia and New York (two major cities), The prevalence of homophobia in our country is pervasive. Do you know how many gay teen suicides there are? Not to mention bullying in school. I could go on and on. I know many professional, well-educated people that are extremely homophobic, some for religious reasons and some that are just plain, old homophobic. And electing Democrats has nothing to do with not being anti-gay. I am not bemoaning what's wrong with my country. I am simply stating a fact to bolster my argument that many would dismiss Adam's music simply because he is gay. |
john bodega 29.05.2012 02:18 |
"I am simply stating a fact to bolster my argument that many would dismiss Adam's music simply because he is gay" Yeah ... cut it out, would you? There must be a word for how you're acting, but I'm having a hard time settling on one. Coming to a bunch of people, saying 'well YOU guys aren't homophobes, but there are homophobes and it's a real problem!' ... I mean, what the ever-loving-fuck? Just shut up already. This is the most ineffectual way of bringing the topic up; it absolutely undermines you, the seriousness of the topic and your beloved Adam Lambert as well. I mean I can't be the only one who sees the ludicrousness of this... complaining to us, on a QUEEN forum, that people will dismiss the music of a gay person... as if it's some kind of fuckin' insight or helpful lesson. If you'd been on the forum long enough you'd know that we've heard from that minority of whackos before - they're very few and far between. Do yourself a favour - buy a hard helmet and go where the fighting is thickest, because all you're doing is alienating people by patronising them and telling them something they probably know better than you do anyway. |
Amazon 29.05.2012 03:54 |
Those comments are still irrelevant. Regardless, I am curious about something. If you read such horrible comments on Queen's facebook page, and was told the worse was at QZ, why would you come here? Why subject yourself to such emotional/verbal violence? I know I couldn't do it. If I was warned that QZ was homophobic, or anti-semitic or Islamophobic or racist or misogynistic, I would never come onto this site, even though I love Queen. Now, people can join whatever website they want for any reason, but why on earth would you join a site you were (mis)led into thinking was homophobic? "P.S. Maybe many of the members in this forum are not from the U.S. and don't quote grasp the depths of hoopobia in this country where many would not consider listening to someone music just because they are a "flamer." " Oh, give me a break. When has ANY member denied that such a thing occurs? Yes, I'm not from the US, however I am fully aware of the homophobia that is present. Anyway Zeb has addressed this perfectly. |
john bodega 29.05.2012 08:39 |
"hoopobia" sounds like a hilarious thing and I think we need more of it in the world :D |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 09:20 |
Geez, can't you guys let one typo go????" |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 09:24 |
Posted: 28 May 12, 16:24 ffs ^^^^^ "you're talkign about small parts of america.....stop trying to imply the whole country is homophobic....that's like saying they're all morbidly obese, eat nothing but pancakes and drive pickups you seem to overlook that in 50% of the last 25 years elections you've elected democrats - and even one of the republican presidents didn't actually win...america is much more liberated than you'd have us believe...stop bemoaning what's wrong with your country and celebrate the advances you've made and the pioneering steps you have taken to lead the world" - Seizure Moment: the shit in all of our ears ([c] Brenski) - i'm drowning here, and you're describing the water -(JN - AGAIG 1997) - a turd in a ribbon, still stinks of shit - ([c] Brenski) |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 09:30 |
someonewholikesadam wrote: |
Amazon 29.05.2012 09:42 |
I asked a question and I don't get an answer. I don't know why I bother. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 09:46 |
A question of me? Thought I answered. |
Amazon 29.05.2012 09:54 |
Yes, I asked a question in my most recent post, regarding joining QZ. |
Amazon 29.05.2012 09:59 |
Sorry, I see that you did answer me. I didn't see that you had as you didn't address me personally. |
Micrówave 29.05.2012 10:23 |
Michael Allred wrote: Ignorance is bliss I suppose. For you to boil down being gay to "what you do with your privates" shows you to be the complete idiot I always thought you were. Microwave wrote: Maybe, if you're gay.For the rest of us who could really care less what you do with your privates Michael Allred wrote: and what precisely is wrong with gay people supporting other gay artists? Why is that "sad"?Complete idiot nailed it. It only matters to gay people... like you. And again, I could care less what you do with your privates. Ellen was funny, too. But then she had to bring her privates into it. Now she's really not that funny anymore and her audience is afternoon housewives and you, Michael Allred. She changed her agenda from "I'm gonna write some funny shit" to "I'm going to be gay and proud of it". Which means if Adam Lambert doesn't evolve and continue to put out the kind of music he does, it won't last very long and some other gay artist will parade his lover around and on and on and on.... we just won't be listening to it twenty years later. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 10:52 |
Microwave, you are really heating me up. Parading a gay love interest on the red carpet is NOT about what you do with your "privates.". Love is not only about what you do with your privates. P.S. Not gay and I love Ellen. I don't see her talking about her "privates" on her talk show or otherwise. And to sound like a broken record, Adam has millions of fans who LOVE his music.. |
Micrówave 29.05.2012 11:31 |
someonewholikesadam... Perhaps you're too young to remember Ellen bringing the lesbian theme to her sitcom. It killed the show. Now she's not funny anymore and has a talk show. While she may not reference her actual "privates" on the show, that is the theme to the whole thing. Take a look at the guest list. You're missing my point. I never said love was about that. I said claiming to be the first outed gay to have a #1 single only matters to gay people. True fans of Adam should be upset that his personal life has anything to do with the quality of his music. Probably why Freddie didn't "parade" it around either. But what is most concerning is the fact that you're "not" gay and you love Ellen. So, at least, you're thinking about it. Which is fine. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 11:58 |
Yes, Microwave, the only people who care about Adam being the first out and proud gay artist to have a #1 album are gays, parents, relatives, friends of gays and people who support the LGBT community. Because it IS important and societally significant. And here we are full circle. Back at the beginning of my comments on this thread. Now go have yourself a cup of non-homophobic tea. |
Michael Allred 29.05.2012 14:17 |
Micrówave wrote: Complete idiot nailed it. It only matters to gay people... like you. And again, I could care less what you do with your privates.Ellen was funny, too. But then she had to bring her privates into it. Now she's really not that funny anymore and her audience is afternoon housewives and you, Michael Allred. She changed her agenda from "I'm gonna write some funny shit" to "I'm going to be gay and proud of it". Which means if Adam Lambert doesn't evolve and continue to put out the kind of music he does, it won't last very long and some other gay artist will parade his lover around and on and on and on.... we just won't be listening to it twenty years later.Her audience consists of afternoon housewives because her talk show is on in the afternoon in most markets you fucking dunce. Ellen has and always will be mainstream humor, she's not suddenly going to be attracting hipsters. I've never thought she was remotely funny but you keep refering to "privates", WTF is wrong with you you ignorant mongoloid? |
GratefulFan 29.05.2012 16:39 |
Ellen did totally blow it on that sitcom. The last funny thing that happened was her "I'm gay" announcement over the airport PA. It was all downhill from there. It's hard to assess whether even in failure it was a step forward for mainstream acceptance, but it's not hard to assess how bad that show got once the show became all about Ellen's gayness. I remember the episode where it was 30 minutes of getting Ellen from her couch to her bedroom for her first experience with her first female lover. Substitute heterosexuals, zoo animals, ameoba, whatever, the problem was that the show was stupid and breathtakingly dull. That's what equality looks like. However well-intentioned, however socially motivated, if you write a dull, stupid show about being gay people won't like your dull, stupid gay show. Not because you're gay, because you got all dull and stupid about your gayness. I don't watch her daytime show, but I think it's successful, so good on her. I'll assume she's hit the sweet spot of being funny and entertaining and only incidentally gay. Shouldn't that be the goal in the end for society as it relates to gayness? Almost complete irrelevance? |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 17:20 |
Yes, Grateful Fan. That is what AL calls 'post-gay" and it is something he, and all gays I imagine, are striving for. In every article or interview that is ever written about him, it states Adam Lambert, openly-gay singer, or some such bullshit. He longs for the day where it can just be Adam Lambert, singer. But we are not there yet. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 17:21 |
And Ellen's sitcom did not fail because of gayness. It failed because it was not funny. You can't get much more gay than Modern Family and that show is funny as hell. |
Micrówave 29.05.2012 18:20 |
Actually, it was pretty funny. And her standup routines were too. After the lesbo episode, though, things changed. Even GratefulFan will back me up on that! But I think the real problem with this thread is the homosexual agenda. All you homos seem to have one. And you wantto be culturally significant... for being gay. WTF?!?!? There's nothing significant about making a sexual choice. Guys have been banging other guys for thousands of years. Why do you all of the sudden need healthcare, equal rights, and now significance for making a #1 single on a music chart? You don't see me marching because I want my girlfriend to be covered by my HMO. She has a job... I have a job. Both have insurance. And we both paid for our own education. Pretty simple concept. Plus I don't believe there have been any GAYS ONLY bathrooms or drinking fountains. Stop trying to elevate yourselves to the "oppressed" category... you're not even close. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 18:54 |
I'm not gay. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 18:57 |
But gays have been murdered just for being gay, you know, like KKK style? You're right. Oppressed is too mild a word. I love all the people who say these type of thngs about gays. I'd love to hear them change their tune if they found out their son or daughter were gay. |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 19:00 |
And, microwave, what if you wanted to marry your girlfriend and wanted her to stay home with the kids? Wouldn't she be covered under your health insurance? |
someonewholikesadam 29.05.2012 22:22 |
Speaking of gay, this is a song Adam cowrote on his new album and is representative of the Adam I love so much. My last post. I know you will miss me, especially Zebonka. link link |
Michael Allred 30.05.2012 09:32 |
Micrówave wrote: Actually, it was pretty funny. And her standup routines were too. After the lesbo episode, though, things changed. Even GratefulFan will back me up on that!But I think the real problem with this thread is the homosexual agenda. All you homos seem to have one. And you wantto be culturally significant... for being gay. WTF?!?!? There's nothing significant about making a sexual choice. Guys have been banging other guys for thousands of years. Why do you all of the sudden need healthcare, equal rights, and now significance for making a #1 single on a music chart?You don't see me marching because I want my girlfriend to be covered by my HMO. She has a job... I have a job. Both have insurance. And we both paid for our own education. Pretty simple concept.Plus I don't believe there have been any GAYS ONLY bathrooms or drinking fountains. Stop trying to elevate yourselves to the "oppressed" category... you're not even close."all you homos" is all I needed to hear from your fucked up, small minded, insignificant self. you are beyond clueless, beyond hopeless. you will never contribute anything worthwhile to this planet, to mankind or the universe in general. I would say I pity you but I don't. |
Micrówave 30.05.2012 09:41 |
someonewholikesadam wrote: But gays have been murdered just for being gay, you know, like KKK style? You're right. Oppressed is too mild a word. I love all the people who say these type of thngs about gays. I'd love to hear them change their tune if they found out their son or daughter were gay. So have Heterosexuals... like KKK style... What about homeless people? The are terrible stories about beatings and killing of homeless people. What if one of those victims pulls through and manages to release a single that shoots straight to #1. Would THAT be culturally significant then? |
Micrówave 30.05.2012 09:43 |
Michael Allred wrote: "all you homos" is all I needed to hear from your fucked up, small minded, insignificant self. you are beyond clueless, beyond hopeless. you will never contribute anything worthwhile to this planet, to mankind or the universe in general. I would say I pity you but I don't.Homo |
Michael Allred 30.05.2012 10:58 |
Micrówave wrote:You should have been aborted, I would have gladly thrown your misbegotten fetus to the dogs for a snack.Michael Allred wrote: "all you homos" is all I needed to hear from your fucked up, small minded, insignificant self. you are beyond clueless, beyond hopeless. you will never contribute anything worthwhile to this planet, to mankind or the universe in general. I would say I pity you but I don't.Homo |
Micrówave 30.05.2012 11:13 |
Here you go, Michael... |
Michael Allred 30.05.2012 11:32 |
Oh Microwave.....ah ha! I wouldn't have fed your aborted fetus to the dogs, I would've popped it in the microwave! Brilliant! but seriously, if I had a time machine, I wouldn't go back and stop Hitler but rather I would try to convince your mother to swallow. |
emrabt 30.05.2012 11:55 |
But gays have been murdered just for being gay, you know, like KKK style=============== People are murdered just for being white, people are murdered for being black, people are murdered just for being oriental. People are murdered for being disabled, scruffy, and homeless. America is probably the only country where this matters, people are obsessed with race, colour and sexual orientation. |
someonewholikesadam 30.05.2012 15:41 |
Adam talks about being a gay artist and at the end talks about singing with Queen. He is the epitome of grace. Many of you here *cough Microwave* could learn a thing or two about being a decent human being from Adam. link |
john bodega 30.05.2012 15:51 |
"My last post" *Keeps posting irrelevant crap that no one gives a shit about* I admire your ability to stick to a commitment! |
GratefulFan 09.06.2012 10:46 |
Dropped 70% in the second week down to number 11. I guess a handful of people can't buy a cart full of CDs forever. |
Missreclusive 09.06.2012 17:25 |
yawn _____________________________ "I'm clutching a meat cleaver, I'm coming apart at the seams" Freddie Mercury |