QueenZone discussion #1304667

GT wrote: Just a quick 'Thank You' to the guys involved with this. Inu, Greg, Jimmy you all did a great job again. And to Ale for his constant superb artwork skills. You guys rock. Enjoy everyone.

abc1 wrote: Wat possible remasterring could have been done if this recording sounds like its coming out of a fat mans asshole?

abc1 wrote: Dont feed the trolls my ass. Who da fuc are u man? Richard Guillbalt?? Richard Shnibalt is more like it. Im not a troll.Im just like one of u, a devoted queen fan. i just dont fancy when recordings sound like my wife's wet queefs.

inu-liger wrote: I would kindly appreciate some feedback if possible from people here as to the remaster job. Our studio dude Joshua doesn't browse on these forums, so he asked me to relay any feedback to him directly :-)And for reference, here's an A:B sample using Boh Rhap, going back and forth every 10 seconds between the raw audio and the remaster mix: link

Despite (at time of writing) recent unfortunate developments in certain inner trading circles committed by people afflicted with something called 'Priority Thinking for People with Common Sensibilities', we are not in any way deterred from sharing the 2nd installment in the Gary Taylor/Jim Jenkins series of previously unreleased and unheard Queen concert tapes. Following the success of our first group effort, Earl's Court 1977 First Night, we are pleased to put out a new alternate audience source for Queen's legendary concert at Hyde Park '76.

inu-liger wrote: Thefallenqueen, I think you've missed the point entirely. This release was about bringing out an ALTERNATIVE source from a historic show, irregardless if the sound quality is inferior OR superior! Most collectors surely appreciate that we made an effort with this, even though the remaster quality wasn't AS drastic an improvement as it was with our previous Earl's Court '77. We did what we could with a shitty sounding recording, and tried making it sound as listenable as possible through taking out the various persistent anomalies that actually induced headaches just listening to! We didn't want to take extreme measures that would have destroyed the integrity of the performance and colour the sound image drastically, Next time please exercise some deep consideration. And this whole thing contrary to your implications, by the way, was in NO way intended to be an April Fool's joke. Learn to read the timestamp on the topic's starting post.

Gregsynth wrote: Psychological remastering is the best remastering technique known to man!

inu-liger wrote: Glad most everyone's enjoying this :) I hope we will have more releases down the line, although any further new work will have to wait until late summer or fall at the earliest, as me and my girlfriend are expecting our first child this month, so I won't really have ANY time to work on these side projects for a while.

inu-liger wrote: Glad most everyone's enjoying this :) I hope we will have more releases down the line, although any further new work will have to wait until late summer or fall at the earliest, as me and my girlfriend are expecting our first child this month, so I won't really have ANY time to work on these side projects for a while.

Rick wrote: Thanks, but I won't download. The quality is simply abysmal.

inu-liger wrote: OK, I do realize some people may be disappointed if the description may have heightened expectations further than viewed as necessary. The thing is, I guess, these remasters are probably more appreciated when using high-end audio headphones or speakers, rather than iPod earbud-quality equipment. And seeing some people comment that they can't tell ANY difference in the A:B sample highly suggests that latter possibility coming into play.

queenboot wrote: the sound will be better when you use a high end audio headphone and set the volume to zero.....

pittrek wrote:

inu-liger wrote: I would kindly appreciate some feedback if possible from people here as to the remaster job. Our studio dude Joshua doesn't browse on these forums, so he asked me to relay any feedback to him directly :-)And for reference, here's an A:B sample using Boh Rhap, going back and forth every 10 seconds between the raw audio and the remaster mix: link

Are you sure you posted the right sample ? Because I can't hear too absolutely no difference. However the spectral analysis looks like a nuclear explosion :-) Here is my attempt to a quick remaster : link - I only removed most of the bass distortion + done a couple of small tweaks

Harry_queenbootlegs wrote: Some people always have something to complain unfortunately.. The sound is bad, that's for sure, but of course much appreciated for sharing a new audience source for everyone for free.

inu-liger wrote: @thefallenqueen: No, he is not. Nor is anyone for that matter at this time. If there are any alternative remaster projects approved (which I doubt), you'll be sure to know.

thefallenqueen wrote: sure? that's a shame as his sample does sound like a re-master

inu-liger wrote: @thefallenqueen: No, he is not. Nor is anyone for that matter at this time. If there are any alternative remaster projects approved (which I doubt), you'll be sure to know.

Adam Baboolal wrote:

thefallenqueen wrote: sure? that's a shame as his sample does sound like a re-master

inu-liger wrote: @thefallenqueen: No, he is not. Nor is anyone for that matter at this time. If there are any alternative remaster projects approved (which I doubt), you'll be sure to know.

Shame indeed. :( If a remastering project is allowed, I'd like to put myself forward as I'm finalising my room for mixing. So far, the room is sounding pretty good for mixing and I have access to some decent software. Adam.

stevegobin wrote: The ZIP file cannot be unarchived. Thank you for making me loose my time!

pittrek wrote: So CAN I continue with other tracks or not ? I'm a bit confused :-)

stevegobin wrote: The ZIP file cannot be unarchived. Thank you for making me loose my time!

stevegobin wrote: The ZIP file cannot be unarchived. Thank you for making me loose my time!