pittrek 19.12.2011 13:52 |
My Days of our Lives BluRay has arrived today. Now I'm officially as angry as I haven't been a long long time. I spent 4 fucking hours trying to PLAY this shit. I don't have a standalone BR player, and I DON'T WANT IT. I have basically 2 computers with BluRay drives + legal versions of PowerDVD (which were bundled with the drives). I tried it on my "main" computer, where I have PowerDVD 9 installed. The attempt to load the disc ended with the message that my PowerDVD has to be updated. Well, OK, it's a legal piece of software, so why not ? I tried to update it, but Cyberdyne - or Cyberlink decided that PowerDVD is too old and they don't make any updates for it anymore. But wait a moment, they're great, I can upgrade my version to PowerDVD 11. Cool, isn't it ? Well, it sounds like a great help, but unfortunately the upgrade costs 49.95 . Is the world completely insane ? I want to watch a bloody bluray disc, and I have to first buy the hardware, the software, the disc itself and than AGAIN the software ? We're currently doing a major upgrade for one of our customers and it's done as standard operational support, if we would go to the customer and tell them "Hey, I know you have an old version of C****S with which you are completely satisfied, but we have decided that you must upgrade, so give us another million" - they would think we're insane. Well so I decided that if I simply rip it to my hard disc, I will be able to play it from my HDD since the ripper will remove the protection. The result - PowerDVD doesn't even bother to throw at me an error message, even some stupid "Exception : nil" which I generate daily would be great ! I got fed up with PowerDVD and I have decided to try WinDVD (just to get "something else"), of course an ILLEGAL COPY - I hate trials, and I wanted to test if the playback works. So I download it, install it, and what happens ? WindDVD starts to actually play the BluRay, and stops after a few seconds. Why ? Because "This protected media can only be displayed through digital output" ??? WTF ? Why the fuck does it care HOW DO I CONNECT MY MONITOR ??? My monitor has ONLY an analog input, should I really buy even a new monitor just to play one fucking documentary ??? HOW CAN I PLAY THIS ???? Any tips please ? PS : FUCK YOU QUEEN PRODUCTIONS ! FUCK YOU UNIVERSAL ! FUCK YOU Cyberlink ! PPS This was the LAST BLU-RAY I EVER BOUGHT ! These cunts don't deserve my money. To play the documentary on my computer, I have to 1. buy a BluRay drive 2. buy PowerDVD 3. buy the BluRay 4. buy an upgrade license for PowerDVD 5. buy a new monitor ( even when I'm absolutely satisfied with my current Samsung SyncMaster 2443NW) which will have a digital HDMI output 6. Buy a new graphic card, which will have HDMI output, even when I'm satisfied with my current 7. Buy a new motherboard, because none of the modern graphic cards will fit into my current motherboard 8. Connect the graphic card with my monitor only via HDMI What will be next ? This must stop ! I BOUGHT the BluRay, why do you treat me like some thief ? |
pittrek 19.12.2011 13:54 |
Or of course I can buy a standalone BluRay player. But not SOME BR player, but a BR player with internet access which can be updated via internet automatically . Which means I have to create a WiFi network inside my hope. Which means I have to buy hardware for creating the WiFi ... |
cmi 19.12.2011 14:02 |
Pittrek, it's very strange to see this kind of post from advanced person like you... Blu-Ray is very good and works perfectly on Blu-Ray player or PowerDVD or Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre 3 software for example. If you don't want to upgrade your software or hardware, please buy DVD and watch it with pleasure. It's easy decision... |
pittrek 19.12.2011 14:13 |
CMI wrote: Pittrek, it's very strange to see this kind of post from advanced person like you... Blu-Ray is very good and works perfectly on Blu-Ray player or PowerDVD or Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre 3 software for example. If you don't want to upgrade your software or hardware, please buy DVD and watch it with pleasure. It's easy decision... Are you sure it WILL work via Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre 3 ? How do you have your monitor connected - analog or digital ? |
GratefulFan 19.12.2011 14:37 |
pittrek wrote: WTF ? Why the fuck does it care HOW DO I CONNECT MY MONITOR ??? It's a recent measure to prevent people from ripping (off) HD content...an optional per-disc part of the AACS protocol that attempts to secure the video channel between the source and the display, and it needs HDCP enabled digital devices to work. It is designed to allow the video channel to kick HD down to DVD quality if the security is bypassed. So I suspect that any new software you aquire will insist on digital components, and older software may force you to try to upgrade as you saw with PowerDVD. Blame AACS. And pirates. Regarding wifi, I have so much wireless communication going on in my house that if we ever do decide it's actually bad for us I'll definitely be toast. Ha ha. I forget that many people are actually still routerless! |
bago.vidovic 19.12.2011 15:53 |
I have a blu-ray drive in my computer but days of our lives doesnt play :( however i have the playstation 3 which plays everything so it works there :) |
Lord Fickle 19.12.2011 16:03 |
My advice, annoying as it may be, would be to go for a stand alone Bluray player, so you can watch the stuff on a proper sized screen, rather than a PC monitor. You don't HAVE to have it connected to a WiFi network. Mine isn't, and never has been, as I don't want to view the Internet content, and I can upgrade the hardware via a download, burned to CD. |
GratefulFan 19.12.2011 16:09 |
bago.vidovic wrote: I have a blu-ray drive in my computer but days of our lives doesnt play :( however i have the playstation 3 which plays everything so it works there :) As of January 1, 2011 any blu-ray players manufactured must prohibit analogue output, and that includes the new PS3s. Just in case the OP was going to run out and buy a PS3, or a new player, and doesn't have HDMI on his TV. :) |
MERQRY 19.12.2011 17:01 |
Hi pittrek i haven't a standalone BR player either, but i can play a BR in my pc with Free software (the only thing i need is a good video card cause the video is a little unsync with the audio) The software (100% free and without instalation) is called MEDIA PLAYER CLASSIC - HOME CINEMA Try with it! i hope it works! Cheers! |
MERQRY 19.12.2011 17:04 |
pittrek wrote: Or of course I can buy a standalone BluRay player. But not SOME BR player, but a BR player with internet access which can be updated via internet automatically . Which means I have to create a WiFi network inside myhope. Which means I have to buy hardware for creating the WiFi ... There's standalone bluray player with LAN access (LAN works with the conmon blue RJ14 cable) so you don't need Wi fi to conect the player to Internet. |
brians wig 19.12.2011 17:06 |
GratefulFan wrote: It's a recent measure to prevent people from ripping (off) HD content... ======================================================================================= Haha! That's the biggest laugh ever! First thing I did when I got my copy was extract the files on my PC using free software easily found on the internet, strip the protection and then back them all up on my Queen video hard-drive; Something which, I might add, I'm legally allowed to do here in the UK, so long as it's purely for my own purposes. I'm more pissed off at the fact that it's NTSC again (well, 60i), which means they've had to create frames to fit the format and therefore added drag and jerking to the picture. Whilst the sound is a major improvement, compared to the HD broadcast on the BBC, the new bluray is hard to actually watch. I can't believe that QPL go to all the trouble of making their product "sound" perfect, but then they happily let Universal fuck it all up by converting PAL video material to NTSC. 3/4 of the world use PAL as their DVD format you know, so why do we constantly end up pandering to the fucking Yanks and their lower quality video format??????? |
brians wig 19.12.2011 17:09 |
GratefulFan wrote: As of January 1, 2011 any blu-ray players manufactured must prohibit analogue output, and that includes the new PS3s. Just in case the OP was going to run out and buy a PS3, or a new player, and doesn't have HDMI on his TV. :) =========================================== Well that's a fucker for me then because I still have a Standard Def CRT. Can't afford an HDTV. There's a recession on and I have a mortgage to pay. At the end of the day it's all pointless. Just go out and buy an HDMI-analogue converter. |
Freddie rey 19.12.2011 17:31 |
I had the same problem as you. I can play it finally on my computer with a program called Any DVD HD. That program can remove all the copyright and anti-copy things and play the bluray disc. Please, try it :) |
popy 19.12.2011 17:39 |
You're being to harsh. Just because you can't play the disc, it doesn't mean you have to post "do not buy the new blu-ray". At least write something like "i can't play the Blu-Ray". A friend of mine bought it, and he showed me and it plays without any problem on his PC. Just because you can't play it, does it mean that no one should buy it? I'm pretty sure that there are people who bought the Blu-Ray and didn't find any problems playing it. |
popy 19.12.2011 19:55 |
brians wig wrote:GratefulFan wrote: It's a recent measure to prevent people from ripping (off) HD content... =======================================================================================Haha! That's the biggest laugh ever! First thing I did when I got my copy was extract the files on my PC using free software easily found on the internet, strip the protection and then back them all up on my Queen video hard-drive; Something which, I might add, I'm legally allowed to do here in the UK, so long as it's purely for my own purposes. link |
Daniel Nester 19.12.2011 22:53 |
My BluRay player was 80 dollars at Wal-Mart. What on earth could be the problem? |
Ale Solan 20.12.2011 00:09 |
ironically (or not) Daniel above me it's quite right... a cheap blu-ray player does all the right work... or even better, why not gettin' a full Power DVD version 11 with an "illegal" serial? it works (it always works) perfectly for me... give it a go to my last advice, Pete ! |
Ale Solan 20.12.2011 00:10 |
sometimes the RIGHT way it's the WRONG way :P |
pittrek 20.12.2011 00:40 |
Freddie rey wrote: I had the same problem as you. I can play it finally on my computer with a program called Any DVD HD. That program can remove all the copyright and anti-copy things and play the bluray disc. Please, try it :) Thanks for the tip. I don't like the idea of having an illegal program running in the background only to be able to watch a legally BOUGHT BluRay, but it looks like I will have to do it |
jamster1111 20.12.2011 00:42 |
Why didn't you just simply buy a bluray player instead of trying to get it to play on your computer? |
pittrek 20.12.2011 00:43 |
popy wrote: You're being to harsh. Just because you can't play the disc, it doesn't mean you have to post "do not buy the new blu-ray". At least write something like "i can't play the Blu-Ray". A friend of mine bought it, and he showed me and it plays without any problem on his PC. Just because you can't play it, does it mean that no one should buy it? I'm pretty sure that there are people who bought the Blu-Ray and didn't find any problems playing it. Yes, you're correct, but please consider I was extremely pissed off yesterday - I spent the whole evening trying to watch it, that's why my post is "slightly" more angry than usual |
pittrek 20.12.2011 00:53 |
Daniel Nester wrote: My BluRay player was 80 dollars at Wal-Mart. What on earth could be the problem? I have under my LED HDTV - a Samsung DVD recorder - a LG DVD player - a Sony (?) VCR (I haven't used it this year and I think I used it once last year, so I don't really remember the manufacturer) - an Asrock HTPC which means it takes up all the space, there are tons of cables etc. I hope you understand that I really don't want another player, even now my living room is a huge mess. It's not about money. It's about the fact, that one company tries to order you what you should do with your computer hardware, and with your flat. It's about the fact that the BD manufacturers come with new "copy protection" methods every year, so there is a very real chance that even if I buy a BD player I will not be able to watch more BluRay discs if they feature NEW copy protection I have MANY BluRay discs - all of them of course official. I have never had ANY playback problems - I had ONE problem with the Star Wars 9BR set, but it was solvable with an PowerDVD update, so I don't count that one. This documentary is the ONLY problematic disc |
dysan 20.12.2011 02:33 |
I bought a PS3 especially for this release. Needless to say, I haven't bothered getting the disc yet. |
YourValentine 20.12.2011 02:54 |
I totally understand you, Peter :-) From reading this thread it looks like you are the victim of industry attempts to protect BDs from piracy although you did buy a legal copy and now you must adjust your hardware which is not your own decision but you feel blackmailed! If I may add another unwanted advice here: you do not need a DVD Player AND a recorder because a recorder also plays the DVD. Personally I removed both my DVD player and recorder (my old player was region-free, lol) after buying the standalone BDplayer/recorder. The BD player/recorder also plays DVDs, DVD-Rs and CDs. I still have a VCR like you, you know why :-) And like you I hate all these cables from TV, BD player, surround sound and CD player :-) |
pittrek 20.12.2011 03:18 |
YourValentine wrote: If I may add another unwanted advice here: you do not need a DVD Player AND a recorder because a recorder also plays the DVD. Well I know, but the DVD player was the first player I bought, and since it's still working I don't wanna throw it away :) |
maxpower 20.12.2011 03:20 |
That monitor isn't HD just standard VGA, so there's your problem, I know QPL make many fuck ups, I don't mean to offend but they are not responsible for PC specification. The monitor is just standard VGA so there is no HDMI or DVI connections (the difference being DVI only carries an video signal (no audio) i.e. like my HP250i which I am using now where as HDMI carries both audio & video) When I use my monitor for PS3 I have to use the DVI cable for the visual side but also connect the bog standard scart connection & split off the red & white phono connections to my hi-fi system & tell PS3 through the setting the audio is being carried by the scart/phono and the picture is being carried separately. Sometimes you just have to juggle things such is life |
pittrek 20.12.2011 03:32 |
maxpower wrote: That monitor isn't HD just standard VGA, so there's your problem, I know QPL make many fuck ups, I don't mean to offend but they are not responsible for PC specification. The monitor is just standard VGA so there is no HDMI or DVI connections (the difference being DVI only carries an video signal (no audio) i.e. like my HP250i which I am using now where as HDMI carries both audio & video) When I use my monitor for PS3 I have to use the DVI cable for the visual side but also connect the bog standard scart connection & split off the red & white phono connections to my hi-fi system & tell PS3 through the setting the audio is being carried by the scart/phono and the picture is being carried separately. Sometimes you just have to juggle things such is life 1920x1080 = HD RESOLUTION. The term "high definition" only says how many pixels must the screen be capable to show, it says nothing about the way how the screen is connected to the source of the signal |
Crazy_Nights92 20.12.2011 06:18 |
Use for it only one player - Arcsoft Total MediaTheatre! It works nice with it! |
pittrek 20.12.2011 07:07 |
Crazy_Nights92 wrote: Use for it only one player - Arcsoft Total MediaTheatre! It works nice with it! Even when I have connected my PC via the good old analog cable ? |
Benn 20.12.2011 11:22 |
What on earth did you expect? Did you ever try to play a CD on a turntable? Same result as with your Blu-Ray disc. |
mooghead 20.12.2011 11:28 |
Try - updating the driver for the blu ray drive from the manufacturer website, or downloading some freeware piece of crap bluray player programme, will probably do the job fine. Damn computers eh? :-) |
Wilki Amieva 20.12.2011 15:51 |
pittrek wrote: 1920x1080 = HD RESOLUTION. The term "high definition" only says how many pixels must the screen be capable to show, it says nothing about the way how the screen is connected to the source of the signal As a matter of fact, (Full) HD is defined by a higher resolution standard (1920x1080 pixels) AND an all-digital interface. RTFM! |
matt z 20.12.2011 18:57 |
Benn wrote: What on earth did you expect? Did you ever try to play a CD on a turntable? Same result as with your Blu-Ray disc. Man, that's just like the time i had to give up walking around and taking the bus with my 45's and player... it was difficult... but i eventually upgraded to cassette. |
tcc 20.12.2011 20:18 |
I thought at first that I had to buy a Blu Ray player just to play one disc (i.e. the DOOL). When I researched on the net about Blu Ray players, I then realised that Blu Ray players can also play DVDs. So, it is not that bad to upgrade and buy a Blu Ray player if it also plays DVDs. To avoid over-working the PC, I prefer not to use the PC to do things which can be done on standalone machines because PCs are more expensive to replace. |
Togg 21.12.2011 03:56 |
Sorry but welcome to the 21st century... if you want to watch Blu rays in that way you have to be prepared to update it every ten mins and have major issues when new disks get released.Blu Ray players are now pretty cheap so I suggest going to buy one and them watching it on a decent TV screen. The way you are doing it is madness. It has nothing to do with Queen Productions |
Daniel Nester 21.12.2011 08:12 |
Pittrek, I hear you on the anti-clutter front. It just to happens that I have a cheapo DVD player that we use for our player in the living room. I bought it at first for the ethernet connectivity. At the time I was trying to break free from cable TV and their bills, which seemed to double every six months. There are issues having the BluRay in the living room. I'd much rather have it in my attic room/mancave/office, so I can watch Metropolis in peace, and now this documentary. But it's not the worst situation. I'm afraid the answer is we're nerds and we have to put up with the clutter. I just sold my freaking laserdisk player over the summer--the only disks that remain are Rare Live, Greatest Hits, and Withnail and I and Spinal Tap. So it was time to say bye-bye to that. I actually wish I had a VHS player and a cassette deck, and am considering getting both, if for not other reason than to digitize old media. I do have an 8-track deck, though. Anyway, I think the responses to your OP are from recognizing this sort obsessive grumpiness in ourselves! |
Indo77 21.12.2011 16:38 |
brians wig wrote:GratefulFan wrote: It's a recent measure to prevent people from ripping (off) HD content... =======================================================================================Haha! That's the biggest laugh ever! First thing I did when I got my copy was extract the files on my PC using free software easily found on the internet, strip the protection and then back them all up on my Queen video hard-drive; Something which, I might add, I'm legally allowed to do here in the UK, so long as it's purely for my own purposes. I'm more pissed off at the fact that it's NTSC again (well, 60i), which means they've had to create frames to fit the format and therefore added drag and jerking to the picture. Whilst the sound is a major improvement, compared to the HD broadcast on the BBC, the new bluray is hard to actually watch. I can't believe that QPL go to all the trouble of making their product "sound" perfect, but then they happily let Universal fuck it all up by converting PAL video material to NTSC. 3/4 of the world use PAL as their DVD format you know, so why do we constantly end up pandering to the fucking Yanks and their lower quality video format??????? Sadly this is now common practice with music DVDs. Screw PAL, make everything NTSC because that format is compatible with 99% of DVD players. It doesn't matter you lose 100 lines of resolution. I doubt the Bluray release will add much to the DVD since the majority of the original footage will have been shot on PAL videotape anyway. The interviews may look nice and the stuff shot on film. |
bigV 21.12.2011 18:07 |
Okay, so let me get this straight... 1. The 2011 remasters, despite having been hailed as the "definitive Queen sound" or something along those lines, were full of remaster errors, not to mention the waste of space on the second CD. 2. The Platinum Collection was re-released, but we don't know if GH3 has been remastered or not. 3. The exhibition was a success and it was a must-see for any Queen fan... if you happened to be a Londoner, that is. 4. The Live at Wembley re-release was nice and all, but most of the extras from the earlier edition were discarded like excreta. 5. The Live at Wembley box set was an overpriced piece of crap according to most people. 6. The Royal Orb (I wanna know who dreamt that up and what they were smoking at the time) promised lossless audio files, but delivered lossy formats. 7. The 40 Years of Queen book was probably the best Queen-related product this year, but from what I gather it had numerous omissions, not to mention the interview CD fiasco. 8. Days of Our Lives has technical problems and I don't even want to comment on the disparity of extras between the DVD and the Blu-Ray editions. 9. The Queen Extravaganza. 'Nuff said. 10. Adam Lambert. Again - 'nuff said. Are you seriously telling me that the only good quality product in this - Queen's 40th anniversary year - was the friggin' Deep Cuts collections? V. |
inu-liger 21.12.2011 18:35 |
bigV wrote: Okay, so let me get this straight... 1. The 2011 remasters, despite having been hailed as the "definitive Queen sound" or something along those lines, were full of remaster errors,not to mention the waste of space on the second CD. 2. The Platinum Collection was re-released, but we don't know if GH3 has been remastered or not. 3. The exhibition was a success and it was a must-see for any Queen fan... if you happened to be a Londoner, that is. 4. The Live at Wembley re-release was nice and all, but most of the extras from the earlier edition were discarded like excreta. 5. The Live at Wembley box set was an overpriced piece of crap according to most people. 6. The Royal Orb (I wanna know who dreamt that up and what they were smoking at the time) promised lossless audio files, but delivered lossy formats. 7. The 40 Years of Queen book was probably the best Queen-related product this year, but from what I gather it had numerous omissions, not to mention the interview CD fiasco. 8. Days of Our Lives has technical problems and I don't even want to comment on the disparity of extras between the DVD and the Blu-Ray editions. 9. The Queen Extravaganza. 'Nuff said. 10. Adam Lambert. Again - 'nuff said. Are you seriously telling me that the only good quality product in this - Queen's 40th anniversary year - was the friggin' Deep Cuts collections? V. Touché! |
pittrek 22.12.2011 07:22 |
Benn wrote: What on earth did you expect? Did you ever try to play a CD on a turntable? Same result as with your Blu-Ray disc. I have the correct software + the correct hardware for playing BluRay discs. ALL OTHER BluRay discs work perfectly. The only problem is that I don't have my monitor connected digitally. It's and absolutely DIFFERENT case than playing a CD on a turntable |
pittrek 22.12.2011 07:37 |
Togg wrote: Sorry but welcome to the 21st century... if you want to watch Blu rays in that way you have to be prepared to update it every ten mins and have major issues when new disks get released.Blu Ray players are now pretty cheap so I suggest going to buy one and them watching it on a decent TV screen. The way you are doing it is madness. It has nothing to do with Queen Productions Do you people have problems with understanding the written word or is it a problem with my language ? 99% of the posts in this thread have absolutely nothing to do with my first post. I'm talking about copy protection. I'm talking about the most idiotic "copy protection" ever invented. I am talking about the fact that a video company thinks it has the right to order their customers what they should do with their own property which I consider a serious moral problem. I stopped buying copy-protected CDs, because I have the moral right to rip my own, legally bought CDs to FLAC. I never bought and never will buy any audio or video from an online store, because they have DRM. I have stopped buying DVDs from companies which put the idiotic "You would never steal a car" warning on their discs, or which put unskippable trailers and commercials before the main menues. Now I have added a new item to my "blacklist" - BluRay discs with HDCP "protection". All that I was trying to say is that I'm gonna vote with my wallet and in the case that Universal / Queen Productions will keep producing HDCP-protected BluRays, that this was the LAST of their BluRays which I ever bought. I apologize for the tone and language used in my first post, but I was very angry and in huge pain. |
pittrek 22.12.2011 07:45 |
bigV wrote: Okay, so let me get this straight... 1. The 2011 remasters, despite having been hailed as the "definitive Queen sound" or something along those lines, were full of remaster errors, not to mention the waste of space on the second CD. 2. The Platinum Collection was re-released, but we don't know if GH3 has been remastered or not. 3. The exhibition was a success and it was a must-see for any Queen fan... if you happened to be a Londoner, that is. 4. The Live at Wembley re-release was nice and all, but most of the extras from the earlier edition were discarded like excreta. 5. The Live at Wembley box set was an overpriced piece of crap according to most people. 6. The Royal Orb (I wanna know who dreamt that up and what they were smoking at the time) promised lossless audio files, but delivered lossy formats. 7. The 40 Years of Queen book was probably the best Queen-related product this year, but from what I gather it had numerous omissions, not to mention the interview CD fiasco. 8. Days of Our Lives has technical problems and I don't even want to comment on the disparity of extras between the DVD and the Blu-Ray editions. 9. The Queen Extravaganza. 'Nuff said. 10. Adam Lambert. Again - 'nuff said. Are you seriously telling me that the only good quality product in this - Queen's 40th anniversary year - was the friggin' Deep Cuts collections? V. 1. I absolutely hate the remasters. Their bonus discs however are absolutely FANTASTIC :-) But for the standard album tracks I'll stick with my Abbey Road remaster and my 2001 Japanese mini-vinyls, I prefer their sound. 2. Absolutely useless release, the shops are still full of the original 1999 release. 3. I'd absolutely LOVE to see it, I still regret that I couldn't get to London because I was too busy :-( 4. The only good thing is the release of the first night, but I wonder how did they manage to f**k up the quality of the video so much :( 5. Yes, I agree 6. What ? The lossless files were actually lossy ? That's the first time I hear about it 7. WONDERFUL BOOK ! I absolutely LOVE IT! But yes, the interview CD was a fiasco 8. I love the documentary, but the BluRay made me pretty angry 9. + 10. Exactly :-) And the Deep Cuts were great ! |
MERQRY 23.12.2011 01:59 |
pittrek wrote: Togg wrote: Sorry but welcome to the 21st century... if you want to watch Blu rays in that way you have to be prepared to update it every ten mins and have major issues when new disks get released.Blu Ray players are now pretty cheap so I suggest going to buy one and them watching it on a decent TV screen. The way you are doing it is madness. It has nothing to do with Queen Productions --------------------------------------------------------- Do you people have problems with understanding the written word or is it a problem with my language ? 99% of the posts in this thread have absolutely nothing to do with my first post. I'm talking about copy protection. I'm talking about the most idiotic "copy protection" ever invented. I am talking about the fact that a video company thinks it has the right to order their customers what they should do with their own property which I consider a seriousmoral problem. I stopped buying copy-protected CDs, because I have the moral right to rip my own, legally bought CDs to FLAC. I never bought and never will buy any audio or video from an online store, because they have DRM. I have stopped buying DVDs from companies which put the idiotic "You would never steal a car" warning on their discs, or which put unskippable trailers and commercials before the main menues. Now I have added a new item to my "blacklist" - BluRay discs with HDCP "protection". All that I was trying to say is that I'm gonna vote with my wallet and in the case that Universal / Queen Productions will keep producing HDCP-protected BluRays, that this was the LAST of their BluRays which I ever bought. I apologize for the tone and language used in my first post, but I was very angry and in huge pain. ------------------------------------- I'm the only person who haven't any problem with the protection??? i only copied the .MT2S files and made 3 things: 1)store the mt2s files on the hard drive of my laptop till the day that i can buy a video card for my pc 2) With too much patience i made an HD rip of all the bonuses (for my own temporal use) cause as my pc hasn't a video card the raw mt2s file had problems with audio/video sync... rip the &%$ blu ray subtitles was all an oddysey i have to admit.... 3) a dvd with the documentary and another dvd with the bonus cause i haven't a standalone Blu ray player yeah... i have to work too much (with a dvd all is more easy) but i NEVER have problems with copy protections or something like that (and as i used FREE software i haven't spent a cent) |
bigV 23.12.2011 07:14 |
I don't know why they even bother with copy protection. The Blu-Ray rip is already available on several torrent sites. V. |
ParisNair 25.12.2011 03:07 |
i have come to accept that you have to upgrade your equipment if you haven't done so atleast in the past 5 years. |
pittrek 25.12.2011 04:49 |
ParisNair wrote: i have come to accept that you have to upgrade your equipment if you haven't done so atleast in the past 5 years. My computer + monitor are 2 years old. My TV and my HTPC were bought this summer. My BR drives were bought a few months ago |
pittrek 25.12.2011 04:51 |
bigV wrote: I don't know why theyeven bother with copy protection. The Blu-Ray rip is already available on several torrent sites. V. Yes. But am I the only one who thinks it's silly that I have to download illegal rips when I bought the official BD ? :-) |