| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 13:42 |
I heard from someone that supposedly John Stuart has acetate studio version of the song "Hangman" and alleged he had promised her to lay out the network. if QPL do not release it officially. today April 20 and he keeps a deathly silence. I think he has no acetate, no one did not sell to him this version. |
| Thistle 20.04.2011 13:47 |
You complete 'tard. When did he say he was going to make it public? |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 13:50 |
Thistleboy 1980 wrote: You complete 'tard. When did he say he was going to make it public? And are you full bastard, you know, he said it to me private, do you understood,whore? |
| inu-liger 20.04.2011 13:55 |
Kindly piss off please, you vile waste of bandwidth |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 13:57 |
inu-liger wrote: Kindly piss off please, you vile waste of bandwidth Shout your dirty mouth,please you' re joyfull clown |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 14:03 |
I'm create my topic not for fat sad morons that you |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 14:06 |
too many idiots on the divorced on queenzone. I'm not an idiot, I am self perfection |
| Thistle 20.04.2011 14:07 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: Thistleboy 1980 wrote: You complete 'tard. When did he say he was going to make it public? And are you full bastard, you know, he said it to me private, do you understood,whore? ============================================================================================= I doubt that Mr. Stewart would deal with you seriously either publically or privately. *This has been edited because I said something nasty which I shouldn't have. I hang my head. |
| Hangman_96 20.04.2011 14:09 |
It can be the truth but we can't discuss anything until we've already got the track. All we need to do is wait when the track appears. Some sources claim that Hangman doesn't exist at all... it would be a pity. |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 14:10 |
much ado without nothing my topic is actually |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 14:12 |
Thistleboy 1980 wrote: Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: Thistleboy 1980 wrote: You complete 'tard. When did he say he was going to make it public? And are you full bastard, you know, he said it to me private, do you understood,whore? ============================================================================================= I doubt that Mr. Stewart would deal with you either publically or privately, you twerp. And me, a "whore"? As they say in Glasgow, "yer maw". Dear Mr. Moron shout you dirty fat hole in your ass it is very very bad smells |
| YannickJoker 20.04.2011 15:09 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy. I've been thinking lately. I've been very lonely you know. My wife has just left me. I go on Queenzone to forget my problems. You make me forget them. And what's even worse, you turn me on so badly. I feel the need to make love to your Russian face over and over again. So what do you say? |
| Thistle 20.04.2011 15:18 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: Dear Mr. Moron shout you dirty fat hole in your ass it is very very bad smells ============================================================================================= Like you, that doesn't even make sense. *This has been edited because I said something nasty which I shouldn't have. I hang my head. |
| deleted user 20.04.2011 15:51 |
Well, this really is the dregs of queenzone |
| brENsKi 20.04.2011 16:01 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: I'm create my topic not for fat sad morons that you ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ no. you created your topic for sad morons like yourself |
| John S Stuart 20.04.2011 16:15 |
Dear Goodoldfashionedloverboy, Not that I think you deserve any sort of reply, but you humour me, so let me return the compliment. First: I can not respond to your personal e-mail, so I have no idea what - or why you have written to me. Here is a copy of the mail I received. Goodoldfashionedloverboy has sent you a new personal message. View the message at: link Here is the message I receive if I click on the link: Server Error in '/' Application. The resource cannot be found. Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly. Requested URL: /queenzone/members/pm.aspx In otherwords, I can not access your mails - or enter into a personal correspondance at this time. However, using my super-powers of deductive reasoning, please allow me to address your concerns expressed in this thread... |
| Thistle 20.04.2011 16:20 |
John S Stuart wrote: I can not respond to your personal e-mail, so I have no idea what - or why you have written to me. ============================================================================================= So you're saying he lied about you saying that this would go public? Shock! |
| Thistle 20.04.2011 16:21 |
kurgan100 wrote: Well, this really is the dregs of queenzone ============================================================================================= Actually, you're right, and for my part in it I should be ashamed - it felt good at the time, but reading back it's downright embarrassing. I think I'll go back and edit it, with an explanation. |
| John S Stuart 20.04.2011 16:28 |
You begin your address in the third person - alleging "promsises" I had made previously: "I heard from SOMEONE that supposedly John Stuart has acetate studio version of the song "Hangman" and alleged he had promised HER to lay out the network" Yet when challenged by our Partick Thistle friend: "Thistleboy 1980 wrote... When did he say he was going to make it public?" Your reply was: "And are you full bastard, you know, he said it to me private, do you understood,whore?" I am sure you can see my dilema - on the one hand, you claim it was to your (girl) friend that I made this "promise", and yet on the other you claim I "said it to (me) in private". I am confused. I do not know you, or your girlfriend, or what on earth you are trying to say to me, but, being of the gentlemanly persuassion, I will give you the answer you so richly deserve. |
| GinjaNinja 20.04.2011 16:32 |
@John S Stuart Being linked to the PM system doesn't seem to work, but you can access them if you click the mail icon near the top right hand corner of the page :) |
| Ale_Pisa 20.04.2011 16:35 |
I really like topics like this!!! :)) |
| John S Stuart 20.04.2011 16:49 |
To make it easier for you I will answer with a multiple choice: "Supposedly John Stuart has acetate studio version of the song "Hangman" and alleged he had promised her to lay out the network. if QPL do not release it officially. today April 20 and he keeps a deathly silence. I think he has no acetate, no one did not sell to him this version. 1: Your assertion is True. I do not own this acetate. It does not exist. I made it all up from a figment of my imagination, and I am a cheat and a liar, and for the past 20 years this had given me nothing but respect, kudos, and the adulation of the millions of Queen fans I have duped over the years. This lie is my primary source of income, so to retract it now would mean that I would live the remainder of my life homeless, and busking badly, while begging for lose change. 2: Your assertion is False. I do own the acetate (or pehaps even did - who knows), but being the private elusive individual I am, have decided to keep quiet because I enjoy my own reclusivity. 3: If number 2 above is true (that is your assertion is false) WHY in the name of all that is Holy, would I have the slightest desire to share this rarity? If it exists, it probobly cost me more, than you paid for your house. So let me get this correct. You want me to purchase with my very hard earned cash - to pay for a very expensive and exclusive work of art, which you feel somehow you should be entitled to - and that I should hand a copy of this artifact over to you for free - because you deserve it? Do you want the keys to my house and car also? You want me to throw my children in with such a deal too? Tell you what - if you want a copy of this acetate - or any other Queen related rarity, please in future do not contact me. By far and away the greatest collector and hoarder of all Queen related material, and the best person in the world to contact would be Dr. Brian H. May at link I am sure he too will be delighted to hand over to you the keys to the Queen vault, and allow you access to all those nice rarities he has accumulated over the years. After all, I only own a "silver tea-spoon" (hypothetically speaking ofcourse), while he on the other hand owns the complete set of tableware (as it were). I therefore do not think it is too selfish of me to say, for an equal percentage of rarities released - I too will match his altruism, and I can't say fairer than that can I? |
| deleted user 20.04.2011 17:00 |
Dear Brian.............. |
| Thistle 20.04.2011 17:00 |
Yep, I don't get why people think they have the divine right to get things that someone else has forked out for for free. I, like the thousands of other fans here, would love if it someday, somehow, saw the light of day - but I can accept that you have it, we don't, and that's it. It doesn't ruin me knowng that! Besides, I'm just grateful for the plethora of tracks, such as the BBC sessions, you have allowed us to grab. |
| david (galashiels) 20.04.2011 17:01 |
i like the t,spoon bit john. i bet the acetate is with brians copy of ,victory. |
| John S Stuart 20.04.2011 18:06 |
To David G: This news is not mine, but came to me from a good friend. I hope he does not mind me sharing it here. From Classic Rock magazine: "Roger Taylor has confirmed the existence of three tracks recorded together by Freddie Mercury and Michael Jackson, and the Queen drummer is currently tidying them up for release during the coming months. The first of these is a demo version of the song State Of Shock, later released by The Jacksons, and featuring the vocals of Mick Jagger in 1984. The friends also recorded two further tracks, entitled, Victory, and There Must Be More To Life Than This." |
| The Real Wizard 20.04.2011 21:46 |
John S Stuart wrote: You want me to purchase with my very hard earned cash - to pay for a very expensive and exclusive work of art, which you feel somehow you should be entitled to - and that I should hand a copy of this artifact over to you for free - because you deserve it? ================ *rapturous applause* |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 20.04.2011 22:36 |
Hmmm, a fan wants to share with the fans something, but for the money. It is a pity that the acetate is the song "Hangman" has not Dave Fuller, he would share with us free, not like John Stuart without offer to exchange but for the money. |
| The Real Wizard 21.04.2011 00:12 |
What exactly have you contributed to the Queen community to make yourself so worthy of everything that happens to exist? What exactly does John (or anyone for that matter) owe you? What have you done to merit it? And what makes you think Dave Fuller publishes everything in his collection online? |
| YannickJoker 21.04.2011 00:49 |
I'm pretty sure Dave Fuller wouldn't even know an acetate if you'd hold an acetate in front of him with 'THIS IS AN ACETATE' written in fontsize 74 on it. |
| dysan 21.04.2011 03:00 |
I'm still pissing myself over that Assassin / Power Of Love spoof from a few years ago. I hope the person that did that does a few more. |
| Benn 21.04.2011 04:44 |
I love trolls like this one; posting in English (and apologies here to all the good QZ'ers who don't have English as their first language but do an incredibly admirable job of making themselves understood) and making themselves even more unintelligible than their poorly reasoned arguments. Unless, of course, this is someone *pretending* to have poor command of English and a poorly reasoned argument........? Hangman exists in the format John says it does, simply because he is a trusted and respected source / collector of long-standing; there is no reason for him to make the story up as he does not stand to benefit from doing so in any manner. Those who believe otherwise are clearly those who would be of the mind to do such a thing themselves had they the thought of it first themselves. Personally, I'm glad John does have it and that its safely in his care. Clearly, had it been in the band's or QPL's care, we would still not have heard the results given the paucity of the bonus tracks compiled on the new re-issue of "Queen". John has served the QZ community with alacrity in all the time I have had any association with this forum and at cost to himself in terms of time and money without any thought of reward - we all thank you for your time and effort over the years John and hope that this does not put you off from making any future gifts and contributions should you choose to do so. |
| Fireplace 21.04.2011 06:56 |
I predict that in the coming years QZ-goers will make it their personal goal to make sure that everyone gets the acetate except our pesky little friend. Think I'll give my copy of the Silver Polar Bear Assasin acetate another spin..... |
| john bodega 21.04.2011 08:18 |
Meh. Far as I'm concerned, the thing is safe where it is. Do I think he should hand it over so everyone can hear it? For sure - it's not even his song, people want to hear it, and the official channels are too lazy/fucking stupid to make any kind of move on getting unheard stuff like this out the door. However, it's just not that big a deal - and if it is safe where it is, and it is being looked after, then what's the fuss? People also forget that Hangman's a shitty song anyway. There's a long list of things I would rather hear. Legally, it might be okay that he has the acetate, but morally I still don't think it's cool - regardless of whatever 'finders keepers' justifications one might have, working materials like these were not meant to be in ordinary folks' hands. The only reason that I find it acceptable in this instance is that QPL is a totally ineffectual, useless entity that would be willing to let stuff like Hangman gather dust for eternity. The day that they make a decision to start selling me what I'm willing to pay for, is when maybe I'll feel a bit different. |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 21.04.2011 11:50 |
fuck off |
| DJGreg 21.04.2011 12:10 |
Anton, you're just a BadYoungFuckingPieceOfCrap. Anymore questions? |
| brENsKi 21.04.2011 12:15 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: fuck off +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ i wish YOU would but tell you what......all this talk about people being forced to "give away" stuff they have paid for.....what utter bollocks....John has paid good money for this, it's HIS investment, and if he gives it away it reduces it's worth to him...for all you know (you useless c*nting twat) this could be part of his retirement fund......so he has EVERY right to hold onto it unless you know differently? in which case....you can have my car keys, my house and my 31 years' worth of pension...will that make you happy you greedy worthless sh*t ? |
| BriantaylorOBE 21.04.2011 12:19 |
fuck off |
| DJGreg 21.04.2011 12:27 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: fuck off I've always knew, that you're an idiot, but I've never suspected, that you will post this shit here!!! |
| Holly2003 21.04.2011 12:44 |
Sir GH wrote: What exactly have you contributed to the Queen community ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Good question. Usually those slabbering the most for free stuff are those who have contributed least so I don't expect him to answer. |
| ole-the-first 21.04.2011 12:44 |
Hey guys, maybe it's time to stop throwing shit to each other? |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 21.04.2011 12:45 |
DJGreg wrote: Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: fuck off I've always knew, that you're an idiot, but I've never suspected, that you will post this shit here!!! =================================================================================== I always knew, that you're a moron gay but I've never thought that you will do " Coming out" |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 21.04.2011 12:46 |
Holly2003 wrote: Sir GH wrote: What exactly have you contributed to the Queen community ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Good question. Usually those slabbering the most for free stuff are those who have contributed least so I don't expect him to answer. ==================================== I want to get that want and someday I will get that I want |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 21.04.2011 12:53 |
I want it all and i want it now |
| Holly2003 21.04.2011 12:55 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: Holly2003 wrote: Sir GH wrote: What exactly have you contributed to the Queen community ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Good question. Usually those slabbering the most for free stuff are those who have contributed least so I don't expect him to answer. ==================================== I want to get that want and someday I will get that I want ======================================================= So we can assume from that gibberish you have contributed nothing? Thought so. |
| BriantaylorOBE 21.04.2011 12:55 |
I want it all and i want it now |
| DJGreg 21.04.2011 12:58 |
Oh, really, you want it all, and you want it now? Asshole. |
| Hangman_96 21.04.2011 13:04 |
What are the reasons for making such a big quarrel guys? |
| splicksplack 21.04.2011 13:12 |
Gosh, it's all gone a bit homophobic hasn't it? I'd quite like to suck a dick and get my stupid ass fucked thank you very much. |
| Holly2003 21.04.2011 13:19 |
splicksplack wrote: Gosh, it's all gone a bit homophobic hasn't it? I'd quite like to suck a dick and get my stupid ass fucked thank you very much. =================================================================== lol! brilliant! |
| brians wig 21.04.2011 14:19 |
Can somebody just delete this idiot and the entire thread? |
| Gregsynth 21.04.2011 14:24 |
Above post: * applause * |
| brENsKi 21.04.2011 16:16 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: I heard from someone that supposedly John Stuart has acetate studio version of the song "Hangman" and alleged he had promised her to lay out the network. if QPL do not release it officially. today April 20 and he keeps a deathly silence. I think he has no acetate, no one did not sell to him this version. Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote:: Hmmm, a fan wants to share with the fans something, but for the money. It is a pity that the acetate is the song "Hangman" has not Dave Fuller, he would share with us free, not like John Stuart without offer to exchange but for the money. Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote:: I want to get that want and someday I will get that I want ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ are you Jabba the f**king Hut? |
| -fatty- 2850 21.04.2011 18:49 |
Whenever I read the ramblings of a complete nut-job on Queenzone, I like to put a voice to them. For example, Chad Hanging was always Big Gay Al from South Park. Jake Britt was Corey Feldman's character from Stand By Me and when Lostman makes those ridiculous threats, I always hear them in my head as though they were spoken by Ivan Drago in Rocky IV. I had been struggling to put a voice to Goodoldfashionedloverboy for a while but having read this thread, I've finally nailed it. It's the Hungarian national played by John Cleese in Monty Python's Flying Circus ("I will not buy this record, it is scratched" and "My hovercraft is full of eels"). Go back and re-read his bollocks in that voice and they're even funnier. fatty. |
| Crazy LittleThing 21.04.2011 21:03 |
-fatty- wrote: Whenever I read the ramblings of a complete nut-job on Queenzone, I like to put a voice to them. For example, Chad Hanging was always Big Gay Al from South Park. Jake Britt was Corey Feldman's character from Stand By Me and when Lostman makes those ridiculous threats, I always hear them in my head as though they were spoken by Ivan Drago in Rocky IV. I had been struggling to put a voice to Goodoldfashionedloverboy for a while but having read this thread, I've finally nailed it. It's the Hungarian national played by John Cleese in Monty Python's Flying Circus ("I will not buy this record, it is scratched" and "My hovercraft is full of eels"). Go back and re-read his bollocks in that voice and they're even funnier. fatty. ------------------------------- Ha ha! This is brilliant. Classic Fatty. Rock on, sir. |
| YannickJoker 21.04.2011 21:06 |
I always hear Bluebottle from the Goon Show when I read posts from Julia. |
| Back2TheLight 21.04.2011 21:30 |
brians wig wrote: Can somebody just delete this idiot and the entire thread? Could not have said it better. Rock on John Stuart...if you have the acetate, that's cool. If you don't, that's cool too. Either way, you have done way more than most on this site, and that my friend has to be applauded! |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 21.04.2011 22:22 |
shut up loosers |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 21.04.2011 22:23 |
for me you are an loosers and nothing more I get pleasure downloads that you upload here although quality your treasure |
| The Real Wizard 22.04.2011 01:51 |
Ok, three pages is enough ... leave the troll alone. |
| john bodega 22.04.2011 02:02 |
"John has paid good money for this, it's HIS investment" Pffff... like I said, I'm glad for him that he's preserving it for posterity (if nothing else) but it wouldn't bother me one iota if it was stolen or confiscated. It'd be his fault for sinking money into something that he can't use and something that shouldn't have been in his grasp in the first place. I've rethought it a bit, and saving it for posterity is all well and good - but one copy of something is a lot less secure than 10000. Some people have never heard of "taking one for the team". |
| Hangman_96 22.04.2011 03:05 |
For those of you who hear the voices in their heads: I recommend you to visit a shrink guys. |
| Josh Henson 22.04.2011 08:35 |
John S Stuart wrote: To make it easier for you I will answer with a multiple choice: "Supposedly John Stuart has acetate studio version of the song "Hangman" and alleged he had promised her to lay out the network. if QPL do not release it officially. today April 20 and he keeps a deathly silence. I think he has no acetate, no one did not sell to him this version. 1: Your assertion is True. I do not own this acetate. It does not exist. I made it all up from a figment of my imagination, and I am a cheat and a liar, and for the past 20 years this had given me nothing but respect, kudos, and the adulation of the millions of Queen fans I have duped over the years. This lie is my primary source of income, so to retract it now would mean that I would live the remainder of my life homeless, and busking badly, while begging for lose change. 2: Your assertion is False. I do own the acetate (or pehaps even did - who knows), but being the private elusive individual I am, have decided to keep quiet because I enjoy my own reclusivity. 3: If number 2 above is true (that is your assertion is false) WHY in the name of all that is Holy, would I have the slightest desire to share this rarity? If it exists, it probobly cost me more, than you paid for your house. So let me get this correct. You want me to purchase with my very hard earned cash - to pay for a very expensive and exclusive work of art, which you feel somehow you should be entitled to - and that I should hand a copy of this artifact over to you for free - because you deserve it? Do you want the keys to my house and car also? You want me to throw my children in with such a deal too? Tell you what - if you want a copy of this acetate - or any other Queen related rarity, please in future do not contact me. By far and away the greatest collector and hoarder of all Queen related material, and the best person in the world to contact would be Dr. Brian H. May at link I am sure he too will be delighted to hand over to you the keys to the Queen vault, and allow you access to all those nice rarities he has accumulated over the years. After all, I only own a "silver tea-spoon" (hypothetically speaking ofcourse), while he on the other hand owns the complete set of tableware (as it were). I therefore do not think it is too selfish of me to say, for an equal percentage of rarities released - I too will match his altruism, and I can't say fairer than that can I? JSS, I respect you immensely, but to make a comment that a record "probably cost me more, than you paid for your house" is troubling. I mean, let's be honest here....it's a freaking record. Who cares? Even if it is Queen. I'm a huge Queen fan, as I'm sure most of us are up here, but let's get real here. Is a record worth more than a house? No. And I'm not bitching at you, as I stated earlier, but that is what's wrong with society - the stupid things we value. I mean any of us can go on a tirade about things that we value and what is important, but we all need to come back down to earth. |
| Mr Mercury 22.04.2011 09:58 |
Josh Henson wrote: JSS, I respect you immensely, but to make a comment that a record "probably cost me more, than you paid for your house" is troubling. I mean, let's be honest here....it's a freaking record. Who cares? Even if it is Queen. I'm a huge Queen fan, as I'm sure most of us are up here, but let's get real here. Is a record worth more than a house? No. And I'm not bitching at you, as I stated earlier, but that is what's wrong with society - the stupid things we value. I mean any of us can go on a tirade about things that we value and what is important, but we all need to come back down to earth.I think that you will find that John's bit about this acetate costing more than the thread starters home is meant as a joke - largely at the expense of the thread starter. I dont think even he would pay that sort of money for an acetate. But even if he did, thats entirely up to him. |
| Josh Henson 22.04.2011 10:38 |
Mr Mercury wrote: Josh Henson wrote: JSS, I respect you immensely, but to make a comment that a record "probably cost me more, than you paid for your house" is troubling. I mean, let's be honest here....it's a freaking record. Who cares? Even if it is Queen. I'm a huge Queen fan, as I'm sure most of us are up here, but let's get real here. Is a record worth more than a house? No. And I'm not bitching at you, as I stated earlier, but that is what's wrong with society - the stupid things we value. I mean any of us can go on a tirade about things that we value and what is important, but we all need to come back down to earth. I think that you will find that John's bit about this acetate costing more than the thread starters home is meant as a joke - largely at the expense of the thread starter. I dont think even he would pay that sort of money for an acetate. But even if he did, thats entirely up to him. --------------- You are probably correct (and I'm sure JSS was joking), but my main point is that we are getting too spun up over a freaking record. It is a record. It will not change the world or make much of a difference. Here is what the real issue with 'Queen World' is as I see it. The band is essentially dead and has their time is over. These 'reissues' are a joke as many up here have said, and there is no real reason to be excited about Queen and any future releases. If they were serious about their legacy then they would be doing more than releasing a shitty series of singles box sets and rehashing their albums, AGAIN, with most of them not really sounding much better than the originals or other reissues (I am making this assumption on what others have said about the sound quality - I don't own any and WILL NOT buy any of these). So to go back to the original comment, yes I agree that JSS was joking but there is a point to what I said. Carry on. And JSS, you do rock. |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 22.04.2011 11:12 |
Sir GH wrote: Ok, three pages is enough ... leave the troll alone. good bye sadly clown |
| emrabt 22.04.2011 11:38 |
goodoldfashionedloverboy, i have a bootleg of john deacons man in the shadows sometime in the next 4 years i will upload a few of the tracks for you. |
| Thistle 22.04.2011 13:14 |
-fatty- wrote: Whenever I read the ramblings of a complete nut-job on Queenzone, I like to put a voice to them. For example, Chad Hanging was always Big Gay Al from South Park. Jake Britt was Corey Feldman's character from Stand By Me and when Lostman makes those ridiculous threats, I always hear them in my head as though they were spoken by Ivan Drago in Rocky IV. I had been struggling to put a voice to Goodoldfashionedloverboy for a while but having read this thread, I've finally nailed it. It's the Hungarian national played by John Cleese in Monty Python's Flying Circus ("I will not buy this record, it is scratched" and "My hovercraft is full of eels"). Go back and re-read his bollocks in that voice and they're even funnier. fatty. ============================================================================================= Fatty, you are the best. In my opinion, you are the most talented guy here, no one can touch you. Heck, that's not even an opinion - it's the TRUTH. Everyone else can just understand, accept, and move on. |
| Fireplace 22.04.2011 21:57 |
Funny Fatty should say that. I keep hearing Borat: "Thieez eez my seester...." And "Goodbye sadly clown" could very well be the title of, let's say, a new Deaky solo album. Actually, it's brilliant! |
| YannickJoker 22.04.2011 22:07 |
Fireplace wrote: And "Goodbye sadly clown" could very well be the title of, let's say, a new Deaky solo album. Actually, it's brilliant! ==== That's more something for his posthumous album. |
| Benn 23.04.2011 02:34 |
Josh, You're right in many ways, however, the facte remains that, despite QPLs continuing attempts at pissing long-term fans and collectors off with sub-standard re-issues and "product", the smallest shred of hope still remains in the minds of *US* as people who are looking out for something of rarity value. Queen's very best days were the era 1971-1977 in the studio and *ANYTHING* that might just add to the weight of that cannon is or would be absolute gold. Something as trite as "Feelings Feelings" just shows how easily Queen were able to make cracking rock songs and make them sound alive, fresh and exciting. If "Hangman" were to appear then it'd be a massive piece of the overall Queen jigsaw and QPL should have seen to this issue years ago. They haven't and didn't and we are all the worse off for it. It's John's to do as he pleases and with any luck, one day, we may get a low-fi MP3 of it available on QZ - we most lkely won't and I have no problem with it. QPL could have removed all debate very quickly and simply but they are (were) too greedy and lazy to be bothered. |
| emrabt 23.04.2011 02:47 |
I have a quick question, is Goodoldfashionedloverboy the user who was known as community? |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 23.04.2011 03:07 |
emrabt wrote: I have a quick question, is Goodoldfashionedloverboy the user who was known as community? Hello,darling. what you want,sucker |
| Mr Mercury 23.04.2011 04:32 |
emrabt wrote: I have a quick question, is Goodoldfashionedloverboy the user who was known as community?Yes it is. |
| Goodoldfashionedloverboy 23.04.2011 04:40 |
Mr Mercury wrote: emrabt wrote: I have a quick question, is Goodoldfashionedloverboy the user who was known as community? Yes it is. YOU KNOW VERY MUCH IT IS TIME TO FUCK YOU |
| YannickJoker 23.04.2011 04:59 |
I'm pretty sure he isn't. Take a look at this: link This was the first thread he started after his namechange. Note how the premise of the topic is absurd to say the least and not really in line with Community's previous (also quite weird) actions. See that 4th reply there from Goodoldfashionedloverboy, about how Community is his nickname? It used to say the user who posted that was Community, and it later changed into Goodoldfashionedloverboy as well. Get what I'm saying? The thread starter was Goodoldfashionedloverboy and he was called Goodoldfashionedloverboy then and yet Community replied as Community and the reply later changed into Goodoldfashionedloverboy. It's confusing but I remembered this. |
| emrabt 23.04.2011 05:06 |
I'm pretty sure he isn't. Take a look at this: link This was the first thread he started after his namechange. Note how the premise of the topic is absurd to say the least and not really in line with Community's previous (also quite weird) actions. See that 4th reply there from Goodoldfashionedloverboy, about how Community is his nickname? It used to say the user who posted that was Community, and it later changed into Goodoldfashionedloverboy as well. Get what I'm saying? The thread starter was Goodoldfashionedloverboy and he was called Goodoldfashionedloverboy then and yet Community replied as Community and the reply later changed into Goodoldfashionedloverboy. It's confusing but I remembered this. ======================# Okay i'm sorry but i only sort of get what you mean, someone with the name Goodoldfashioinedloverboy made that thread, community (the real guy) posted in that thread, then changed his name to match the thread posters? It leave the big questions of why And where is the real community? |
| YannickJoker 23.04.2011 05:11 |
emrabt wrote: then changed his name to match the thread posters? ==== I don't know that part either. I just know it changed and I don't know what the hell went on and nobody seemed to care. |
| Hangman_96 23.04.2011 05:26 |
emrabt wrote: Okay i'm sorry but i only sort of get what you mean, someone with the name Goodoldfashioinedloverboy made that thread, community (the real guy) posted in that thread, then changed his name to match the thread posters? It leave the big questions of why And where is the real community? ==== The real community is still on QZ. His nickname is Goodoldfashionedloverboy now but there are two Goodoldfashionedloverboy's and the second one is fake. |
| emrabt 23.04.2011 05:32 |
so the foul mouthed incoherent Goodoldfasionedlover boy in this thread is real? |
| Hangman_96 23.04.2011 05:34 |
I should agree, very strange things happen on QZ. Maybe there are some QZ's errors which have got three different nicknames into the one. Take a look at these two topics... it's very interesting what the hell is going there? link link |
| Hangman_96 23.04.2011 05:37 |
emrabt wrote: so the foul mouthed incoherent Goodoldfasionedlover boy in this thread is real? ==== If you mean the thread in which we're talking right now then yes, here we have the real Goodoldfashionedloverboy. |
| emrabt 23.04.2011 05:40 |
If you mean the thread in which we're talking right now then yes, here we have the real Goodoldfashionedloverboy. ================================ Okay thank you, so the real one is making crazy posts like these, demanding rare stuff and swearing? Community never used to be like that. |
| Hangman_96 23.04.2011 05:46 |
emrabt wrote: Okay thank you, so the real one is making crazy posts like these, demanding rare stuff and swearing? Community never used to be like that. ==== If you look at the two topics which I've linked above, you'll understand that the fake Goodoldfashionedloverboy registered much time later than the real one. And so fake was writing bunch of the same posts in those two topics to gather the same quantity of posts as the real Goodoldfasionedloverboy. Then he changed his nickname and the avatar pic just like the real Goodoldfashionedloverbouy to make himself look like him and then he's started his deals to make the jokes to the real Goodoldfashionedloverboy. |
| Hangman_96 23.04.2011 05:48 |
Now that all seems to be clear. |
| emrabt 23.04.2011 05:58 |
that makes sense, but there's no way those repeating posts would add up to 545. |
| Hangman_96 23.04.2011 06:02 |
emrabt wrote: that makes sense, but there's no way those repeating posts would add up to 545. ==== Agreed, but those two topics are not the only ones in which he was writing. He's been writing in many other topics which could add his posts up to 545 now. |
| Mr Mercury 23.04.2011 07:41 |
Goodoldfashionedloverboy wrote: YOU KNOW VERY MUCH IT IS TIME TO FUCK YOUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA What a load of "carp" you do have the possession of no wit to write. |
| YannickJoker 23.04.2011 21:37 |
Pretty weird how this thread seems to have disappeared from the General Discussion while the last post was today. I wonder if this post will bring it back. And it didn't. |
| Bicycle 29.05.2011 08:57 |
Wow, so this topic is still alive? I thought it was deleted a long time ago. Brings back good memories. |