The Real Wizard 13.02.2011 13:38 |
The second-earliest known Queen recording from the US is now out there.. link Hopefully someone can bring it here.. ? |
GuitarMay 13.02.2011 13:51 |
Amazing share on Dime !!! I'll try to post here in Queenzone, right now ! |
Hangman_96 13.02.2011 13:52 |
Excellent! I waited for that one for a long time and now it's up. Thanks! |
Stephane15 13.02.2011 13:52 |
Here it is. Enjoy ! |
GuitarMay 13.02.2011 14:11 |
Well... you're so fast Stephane15, hein ? ... he he what matters is what is already available for everyone here in Queenzone !!! :) |
bruno_facio 13.02.2011 14:12 |
Thanks a LOT Stephane15! Is possible to share here too the mott the hoople recording from the same gig ? link |
on my way up 13.02.2011 14:16 |
I'm listening to it now! very enjoyable to me, even though there's distortion. I don't mind:-) |
The Real Wizard 13.02.2011 14:19 |
Thanks Stephane ! Could someone also share the 96/24 version ? |
Gregsynth 13.02.2011 14:40 |
Thank you Bob and Stephanie! Oh, and thanks to Dan Lampinski! |
last-horizon 42265 13.02.2011 14:58 |
Thanks! |
deleted user 13.02.2011 15:03 |
This is fantastic! :) |
Tim June 13.02.2011 15:13 |
Wow! Thank you very much for sharing this interesting recording! : ) |
Ginger01 13.02.2011 15:19 |
Here's the Mott 16-44. The Queen24-96 is about half finished as I write this. I'll seed it here if no one else beats me to it :) Here are the setlist and lineage. Other notes are in the info file. CD1 01 intro 02 American Pie 03 The Golden Age Of Rock 'N' Roll 04 Sucker (spliced) 05 Roll Away The Stone/sweet Jane 06 Rest in Peace 07 All the Way From Memphis 08 Born Late '58 09 One Of The Boys 10 Hymn for the Dudes (spliced) 11 Marionette 12 Drivin' Sister > 13 Crash Street Kids > 14 Violence CD2 01 E: All the Young Dudes 02 Walkin' With A Mountain (spliced) unknown model dictation style Tape Recorder External Mono Microphone Scotch cassettes Mastered and FLAC'ed by Carl Morstadt (dantalion8@yahoo.com) Master Cassette -> Nakamichi CR-3A cassette deck with azimuth correction -> M-Audio Firewire Audiophile 2496 -> CDWAV 24-bit/96-KHz wav files -> Goldwave (normalizing and crossfades) -> CDWAV (track breaks) -> dBpowerAMP Audio Converter (24-bit/96-KHz wav files converted to 16-bit/44.1 KHz wav files) -> FLAC Front End (FLAC 8 with sector boundary alignment) FLAC files tagged with Foobar2000 Live Show Tagger No EQ'ing. |
tjleone 13.02.2011 15:36 |
Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i can't wait to hear this!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lampinsky is very important to the Music Sharing!! I wish I could thank him personally. Living in Massachusetts and hearing all these recordings from him (especially a Gary Wright show my late brother attended in the 70's) means alot to me. |
Ginger01 13.02.2011 15:48 |
Here's the Mott 24/96... Queen won't be long now :)) |
Ginger01 13.02.2011 16:02 |
And now.... the Queen 24-96!! Good download, everybody :)) |
MERQRY 13.02.2011 18:01 |
If anyone could upload this in Mediafire it would be great! Cheers! |
A Word In Your Ear 13.02.2011 18:20 |
Thank You So much to everyone for these!!!! |
fbrjqueen 13.02.2011 19:06 |
WOWWW! thank you very much for this!!! Could someone explain to me this 16-44 24-96 thing??? |
brians wig 13.02.2011 19:12 |
Bloody hell. They said the final lampinski was going to blow people away, and this certainly is! Thanks for uploading both versions here :) |
MERQRY 13.02.2011 22:34 |
fbrjqueen wrote: WOWWW! thank you very much for this!!! Could someone explain to me this 16-44 24-96 thing??? ----------------------------------------------------------------- That means 16 bits 44.100 Hz and 24 bits 96.000 Hz. The bits indicate the audio Depth and the Hz the sample frecuency. The conmmon cds have 16 bits and 44.100 hz Cheers! |
Cruella de Vil 13.02.2011 23:27 |
H there, I'm unable to use torrents. Is there anyone out there who has the time to make this file available on megaupload? If so, thank you very much. |
The Real Wizard 14.02.2011 00:31 |
Damn, what a cool solo by Brian in Liar... he uses his delay, but never, ever in this song... a one time thing. Very unique. |
The Real Wizard 14.02.2011 01:44 |
Here's a direct download of the 16/44 version, for those who can't torrent - link |
pittrek 14.02.2011 01:58 |
Strange, I looked yesterday afternoon on Dime and there was nothing yet :-)Looking forward to downloading this one, what's the sound quality on this one ? |
MERQRY 14.02.2011 02:43 |
Sir GH wrote: Here's a direct download of the 16/44 version, for those who can't torrent - link -------------------------------- A MillonThanks bob! Cheers! |
The Real Wizard 14.02.2011 02:44 |
pittrek wrote: what's the sound quality on this one ? =============================== Not great. But still worth a listen. |
Lazing On A Sunday Afternoon 14.02.2011 03:01 |
Thanks very much to everybody!! I'm looking forward to hear it! |
Cruella de Vil 14.02.2011 05:35 |
Dear Bob/Sir GH, Thank you very much! I look forward to hearing his soon. Have a nice day! |
vivaqueen 14.02.2011 05:52 |
MERCI BEAUCOUP |
therhyeman 14.02.2011 06:33 |
Thanks a lot for uploading this. Always great to add another show to the collection :)) Tim |
Magda1983 14.02.2011 08:04 |
Thank you :) |
pittrek 14.02.2011 11:04 |
OK I'm just listening to it. Can somebody fix the speed ? :-) |
stark 15.02.2011 06:02 |
fbrjqueen wrote: WOWWW! thank you very much for this!!! Could someone explain to me this 16-44 24-96 thing??? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quick, hopefully simple, analogy: when you watch a film, you're actually looking at between 25 and 30 still photographs whizzing by every second. This fools the human eye into seeing fluid movement. When you listen to digital audio (i.e. a CD), you're actually hearing 44,100 'photographs', or snapshots, of audio per second. Likewise this fools the ear into hearing continuous sound. Current technology can increase this to about 192,000 snapshots per second, but 44,100 is the CD audio standard. The 16-bit part means that each of those 44,100 snapshots is stored as a 16 digit-long binary 'word' (piece of information). Again, this resolution can currently be increased to 32-bit words (maybe even 64?), but 16 is the CD audio standard. You can see from this that the more snapshots we use per second, coupled with longer words (think of increased decimal places or accuracy of the snapshot), the greater the resolution of the captured audio will be. Hope that helps. And many thanks indeed to everyone involved in getting this recording to us! |
Harry_queenrecordings 15.02.2011 06:28 |
This is fantastic! A new US 1974 recording, really exciting! Many thanks to everyone who is involved for making the share! |
FriedChicken 15.02.2011 06:28 |
It's running too slow! Why don't people check these things before uploading? |
pittrek 15.02.2011 06:55 |
FriedChicken wrote: It's running too slow! Why don't people check these things before uploading? ------------------- A speed corrected version is also here |
The Real Wizard 15.02.2011 10:11 |
stark wrote: Quick, hopefully simple, analogy: when you watch a film, you're actually looking at between 25 and 30 still photographs whizzing by every second. This fools the human eye into seeing fluid movement. When you listen to digital audio (i.e. a CD), you're actually hearing 44,100 'photographs', or snapshots, of audio per second. Likewise this fools the ear into hearing continuous sound. Current technology can increase this to about 192,000 snapshots per second, but 44,100 is the CD audio standard. The 16-bit part means that each of those 44,100 snapshots is stored as a 16 digit-long binary 'word' (piece of information). Again, this resolution can currently be increased to 32-bit words (maybe even 64?), but 16 is the CD audio standard. You can see from this that the more snapshots we use per second, coupled with longer words (think of increased decimal places or accuracy of the snapshot), the greater the resolution of the captured audio will be. ---------------------------------------------- Perfect analogy, Stark. Whenever people say that they can't hear the difference between 16/44 and 24/96, I just think, "I guess not all ears were created equal." |
FriedChicken 15.02.2011 12:20 |
pittrek wrote: FriedChicken wrote: It's running too slow! Why don't people check these things before uploading? ------------------- A speed corrected version is also here Thanks! But still.... why would someone not check before uploading... |
The Real Wizard 15.02.2011 12:24 |
Not everyone has the musician's ear and can hear such things... it's as simple as that. |
TimBHM 15.02.2011 15:25 |
Wow - thanks Ginger, you're my favourite! ;-) |
DGAA 15.02.2011 15:27 |
Thank You !!! |
Rick 16.02.2011 03:33 |
It's nice to have a new recording, thanks to the sharer(!), but the quality is terrible. I can't listen to this. Then again, one shouldn't expect too much from such an old recording. |
The Real Wizard 16.02.2011 13:41 |
Rick wrote: Then again, one shouldn't expect too much from such an old recording. ========== Well, you should... ! It all depends on what gear they used, where in the venue they were standing, how good the sound mix was that night, etc. The recording from next night in Portland sounds leagues better than this. And there are audience recordings from the late 60s that sound even better than that. |
Rick 17.02.2011 04:26 |
Sir GH wrote: Rick wrote: Then again, one shouldn't expect too much from such an old recording. ========== Well, you should... ! It all depends on what gear they used, where in the venue they were standing, how good the sound mix was that night, etc. The recording from next night in Portland sounds leagues better than this. And there are audience recordings from the late 60s that sound even better than that. ========== Exceptions taken into account of course. But generally, I think you should not expect too much. |
bokkepoot 28.01.2012 07:24 |
New download-links for this share: link |