QueenZone discussion #1232714

Wiley wrote: I was expecing an M. Night Shyamalan twist ending in which we find out Wilki has been dead for 10 years and has haunted Internet Queen forums ever since :).

Walter White wrote: GF, as you say, always had some great posts and banter, and didn't really deserve the shit she took for the Fuller thing. It wasn't just her that slated the guy, so a lot of the stick was unfair.

Wilki Amieva wrote: I'd rather do a David Lynch ending...

Walter White wrote: ^ bumping up your own funnies? tut tut ;)

inu-liger wrote: Things can only improve once she issues the apology that was DEMANDED of her which I don't think was ever issued, unless I'm mistaken otherwise

GratefulFan wrote: Goodness. My last post here was my last post here because the evening that I made it was the evening that I discovered the "moderator" (choke) trolling the site of my workplace (in the middle of a QZ conversation about what I did for a living) via a google search using my real name. Since I had never given the "moderator" my real name it was a bit on the wtf side. I asked, it was denied, I found that cowardly and offensive, and I left. I have been on the wrong side of web wars spilling over into my real life in the past by mobby anonymity and was unwilling to risk that again when the bias of the "moderator" was so clear and so ridiculous. Barely here but willing to lap up the COMPLETELY FUCKING ABSURD notion that I was abusive to anybody over Asperger's or anything of the like. And the only apology that went on I believe was from Richard who had to apologize for mischaracterizing something about my comments that night. So that is why I stopped posting. No other reason. Hope those of you who aren't idiots are well and happy.

Panchgani wrote:

GratefulFan wrote: Goodness. My last post here was my last post here because the evening that I made it was the evening that I discovered the "moderator" (choke) trolling the site of my workplace (in the middle of a QZ conversation about what I did for a living) via a google search using my real name. Since I had never given the "moderator" my real name it was a bit on the wtf side. I asked, it was denied, I found that cowardly and offensive, and I left. I have been on the wrong side of web wars spilling over into my real life in the past by mobby anonymity and was unwilling to risk that again when the bias of the "moderator" was so clear and so ridiculous. Barely here but willing to lap up the COMPLETELY FUCKING ABSURD notion that I was abusive to anybody over Asperger's or anything of the like. And the only apology that went on I believe was from Richard who had to apologize for mischaracterizing something about my comments that night. So that is why I stopped posting. No other reason. Hope those of you who aren't idiots are well and happy.

I am fine. Thanks Grateful Fan

inu-liger wrote: "And the only apology that went on I believe was from Richard who had to apologize for mischaracterizing something about my comments that night." Which still proves that you have yet to issue a formal apology as was demanded by myself and YV over the way you treated me and using my Asperger's as a prop in your twisted posts. Fairly sure what I apologized for was misremembering what your job profession actually was. If anything, it's possible I might have had you confused with another user with regards to that, and when that shit was still fresh on the fan at the time I was under an extreme amount of stress due to various situations both IRL and online (the latter mainly to do with this website) which did not help.

Panchgani wrote:QZ Moderator trolling ... Is that a bad quality for a moderator to have? No wonder "Ale Solan" has not been banned for posting 3000+ spam posts a few days ago in the "Announce" section.

Panchgani wrote:I'll conveniently assume you will provide an explanation of why Ale Solan should be the only QZer to spam 3000+ messages in one night and not been banned. LOL I was going write him/her but forgot. I never saw proof that Tiger is female.

Panchgani wrote:

inu-liger wrote:Please ban him...

I'll conveniently assume you will provide an explanation of why Ale Solan should be the only QZer to spam 3000+ messages in one night and not been banned. LOL

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: Wait, who is GF seriously trying to accuse of internet stalking? Is that paranoid persecution-fantasy of GF's getting this extreme?

GratefulFan wrote: Goodness. My last post here was my last post here because the evening that I made it was the evening that I discovered the "moderator" (choke) trolling the site of my workplace (in the middle of a QZ conversation about what I did for a living) via a google search using my real name. Since I had never given the "moderator" my real name it was a bit on the wtf side. I asked, it was denied, I found that cowardly and offensive, and I left.

I have been on the wrong side of web wars spilling over into my real life in the past by mobby anonymity and was unwilling to risk that again when the bias of the "moderator" was so clear and so ridiculous. Barely here but willing to lap up the COMPLETELY FUCKING ABSURD notion that I was abusive to anybody over Asperger's or anything of the like.

GratefulFan wrote: And it's a hell of a better case that the one for me hassling Richard about his Asperger's struggles, which was pulled straight out of his ass and rubber stamped by the wild bias of the world's shittiest moderator.

inu-liger wrote:

GratefulFan wrote: And it's a hell of a better case that the one for me hassling Richard about his Asperger's struggles, which was pulled straight out of his ass and rubber stamped by the wild bias of the world's shittiest moderator.

So let me get this straight, are you fucking saying that I am completely making up the fact that I have Asperger's, never mind dismissing my very real life struggles associated with it? If that's the case, you are certainly in the running for QZ's asshole of the year. I am NOT lying about my Asperger's one bit. There have been a few QZ'ers that have met me IRL or who've talked to me over Skype/Mumble long enough that they can most certainly vouch that I am NOT making this shit up.

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: How do you know said moderator was looking into your personal information?

GratefulFan wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

GratefulFan wrote: And it's a hell of a better case that the one for me hassling Richard about his Asperger's struggles, which was pulled straight out of his ass and rubber stamped by the wild bias of the world's shittiest moderator.

So let me get this straight, are you fucking saying that I am completely making up the fact that I have Asperger's, never mind dismissing my very real life struggles associated with it? If that's the case, you are certainly in the running for QZ's asshole of the year. I am NOT lying about my Asperger's one bit. There have been a few QZ'ers that have met me IRL or who've talked to me over Skype/Mumble long enough that they can most certainly vouch that I am NOT making this shit up.

No. Of course not, and I'm sorry if my wording might have suggested that. I'm referring to the completely FALSE implication that I would ever in ten million years hurt or belittle someone over any physical, emotional or psychological affliction or condition. That's what's pulled out of your ass, and fashioned into a suppressive pity drum you've been beating ever since.

Panchgani wrote: When I hear the name Urkel, I think of a pushy, nosy arrogant, annoying, and irksome nerd ... definitely not Asperger's. You're so vain, I bet you think this is about Aspergers. Don't You? Don't You? Don't You? LOL

GratefulFan wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: How do you know said moderator was looking into your personal information?

What? I don't know what was being sought. I just know where the search landed. Which on my workplace website, directly on my contact information, title etc. It's the first hit after Facebook stuff when you google me by name. Not hard to get there. Again, allegedly. It's a big old world and anything is possible. But given the facts it's a reasonable assumption. Reasonable enough in my mind for me to have decided to leave.

Panchgani wrote: When I hear the name Urkel, I think of a pushy, nosy arrogant, annoying, and irksome nerd ... definitely not Asperger's. You're so vain, I bet you think this is about Aspergers. Don't You? Don't You? Don't You? LOL

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

GratefulFan wrote:

thomasquinn 32989 wrote: How do you know said moderator was looking into your personal information?

What? I don't know what was being sought. I just know where the search landed. Which on my workplace website, directly on my contact information, title etc. It's the first hit after Facebook stuff when you google me by name. Not hard to get there. Again, allegedly. It's a big old world and anything is possible. But given the facts it's a reasonable assumption. Reasonable enough in my mind for me to have decided to leave.

I really do not understand. How do you know that someone ran a search for you? And if someone landed on your "workplace website, directly on [your] contact information", how can you possibly conclude that this was done by anyone from QZ, let alone the moderator? I mean, if it's your workplace website, I take it that you do get visits from people who are interested in that website for professional reasons, right?

thomasquinn 32989 wrote:

Panchgani wrote: When I hear the name Urkel, I think of a pushy, nosy arrogant, annoying, and irksome nerd ... definitely not Asperger's. You're so vain, I bet you think this is about Aspergers. Don't You? Don't You? Don't You? LOL

Is there a bullying-vacancy you are trying to apply for? Did you get a restraining order from your local primary school's playground or something?

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Welcome back Grateful Fan, ignore the imbeciles :)

"Oh yeah, I had Reaction stuff way before the Fanthology. You can put whatever I say to you on there :) I've put LOADS into the Fanthology- that kinda pisses me off that they'd lie like that, but whatever. Hoarders are usually scumbags with no morals. I DID make a video for Stuart, he wanted me to do a fan mix video for the Macbeth stuff so I obliged, even though it was a bit of a waste of time considering my focus of official stuff to the fanthology."

Donna13 wrote: So, he just plays by his own rules, basically. Thank you for your posts, GF.

John S Stuart wrote: GF: I also recall you enjoyed having frequent pops at me about deleting my angrier ranting posts - after the event - when I had time to reflect on and regret my childish foolishness. Now I see that you have done the same above: "Posted: 12 Feb 14, 08:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote". Funny how you seem to mirror everything I was saying/doing two years ago; except now you find it totally logic and acceptable. How times change (for the better).

Panchgani wrote:

John S Stuart wrote: GF: I also recall you enjoyed having frequent pops at me about deleting my angrier ranting posts - after the event - when I had time to reflect on and regret my childish foolishness. Now I see that you have done the same above: "Posted: 12 Feb 14, 08:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote". Funny how you seem to mirror everything I was saying/doing two years ago; except now you find it totally logic and acceptable. How times change (for the better).

She reflected on an earlier post and added her thoughts in a later post. She did not delete nor modify her post.

John S Stuart wrote:

Panchgani wrote:

John S Stuart wrote: GF: I also recall you enjoyed having frequent pops at me about deleting my angrier ranting posts - after the event - when I had time to reflect on and regret my childish foolishness. Now I see that you have done the same above: "Posted: 12 Feb 14, 08:39 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote". Funny how you seem to mirror everything I was saying/doing two years ago; except now you find it totally logic and acceptable. How times change (for the better).

She reflected on an earlier post and added her thoughts in a later post. She did not delete nor modify her post.

Page 2 of this thread Post 10 of page 2 (Middle post of GF's 3) SHOWS otherwise. This post HAS indeed been deleted! so you CANNOT say "She did not delete nor modify her post" - because she did delete! A blind man in a dark room can see that! I am just calling this because when/if I deleted a post (and explained afterwards why - "I reflected on an earlier post and have added my thoughts in a later post") - she was the most unforgiving b*tch in the board. Now she has done exactly the same thing and it has come back to haunt her; I find it all very ironic, hypocritical and most of all amusing. Now; I can't be incorrect here (yet) as the evidence is still there for all to see. (Unless it is modified later). As I said; how times change for the better.

inu-liger wrote: It's ultimately regrettable how negatively GF turned for the worse as a person here, honesty. To THINK, the year before she went berserk defending Fuller, she used to be so nice and even once allowed us to participate in a Queen goodies giveaway from her own collection. Geez. What a world!

Walter White wrote: ^^^ Don't you think you should give it a rest with the petty name-calling, Panchgani? Even if you don't agree with Inu, there's no need for that: all you're doing is belittling your own character. We all know what side of the fence you sit on, which, respectfully, is your own prerogative - you don't have to reinforce your stance with comments like that. I know there's upset on both sides, and both are equally trying to put their side of the story across. For what it's worth, I class both Inu and GF as friends, both here and elsewhere, and would love this to stop. I can see why both are upset, and I can see why both want the other to back down - however, maybe we should lay off this topic altogether as it's spilling over throughout the whole forum. It'd be nice to see everyone getting on, but if it's not going to happen then we're better off saying nothing on it at all.

Walter White wrote: ^^^ Don't you think you should give it a rest with the petty name-calling, Panchgani? Even if you don't agree with Inu, there's no need for that: all you're doing is belittling your own character. We all know what side of the fence you sit on, which, respectfully, is your own prerogative - you don't have to reinforce your stance with comments like that.

Panchgani wrote: You do not seem to care about insults Inu leveled at GF. I won't stand by while Inu insults GF, while Inu plays victim. If he can dish out the abuse, he can sure as well take it.

inu-liger wrote: "Should I stay, or should I go?"