Now this may not be as big as the OJ TRIAL, but this is sure to be the next big trial here in the U.S. Be interested to see what everybody's thoughts are before the actual facts of the case come out.
GUILTY - He did it, paid the hooker, had some booze in the room, send him away
NOT GUILTY - "LT did not have consentual sex with anybody this morning" - LT's attorney
STUPID - Probably knew it was a hooker, didn't ask about the bruise on her face, though...
INSANE - Blacked out, had no recollection of the entire events, blames it on meds and some undisclosed illness
FRAMED - Joe Theisman tries to extract revenge for early retirement and failed broadcast career
NO CRIME COMMITTED - (Alabama residents only)
I'm going with STUPID and leaning towards the Temporary Insanity defense
It's amazing how difficult it can be to overcome the barrier of a common language. I've had to learn what bollocks means and what toffs are and what snogging is and that you people take the piss out of each other (!) and now, apparently, that there are two names for HOCKEY, and neither of them seem to make much sense.