GratefulFan 06.04.2010 14:13 |
Pretend for a moment that both Roger and Brian have put together solo shows and you get to have front row seats and personal back stage access to both at a fantastic venue. The catch is you can only go to one of the shows. You don't know what material will be played, or who might be along as a guest or guests (maybe Brian would invite Roger, or vice versa!) or anything other than where to go and when to show up. You only know what you know of their past work and the Queen catalogue and their current artistic interests and instincts. Which one would you choose, and, if you like, why? It would be a very, very difficult choice for me. In Brian's favour is that guitar - I'd so desperately love to hear that guitar in person. Also the fact that he tends to invoke Freddie more in his communication, which some feel cynical about, but I'm still a sucker for. And when I got the chance to talk to him for a while back stage, well he's just so fiercely intelligent that I think it would be a genuine joy and privilege. But, but....his voice is thin and most impactful when used sparingly throughout a show. And I'd be afraid he'd bring Kerry Ellis or somebody like that and I'd just end up standing there wishing I was at Roger's concert. The possibility of maybe hearing 'I'm in Love with my Car' or 'Tenement Funster' would be, I think, impossible for me to pass up given the doubts I'd have about Brian's current interests being in line with my taste. And Roger's voice has always been a great rock and roll voice. So, with a great deal of trepidation about missing Brian's show, I'm going to Roger's concert. I think. Sigh. |
PrincessofTaylor 06.04.2010 15:01 |
I'd choose Roger. It wouldn't even be a contest. Roger has been my favorite member of the band since I first saw the Montreal '81 show. During Under Pressure, I commented on how they must have had a backing track of David Bowie's vocals, then I realized it was Roger singing and simultaneously playing drums. I was absolutely astonished. I have three of his solo albums (everything but Fun in Space) and think they are all great. I don't have any of Brian's so I wouldn't know any solo songs on that setlist. I'd basically know all of Roger's solo songs. I also think Roger's voice is just wonderful and has improved over the years. His vocals at Band de Lac and during the accoustic portions of the 2008 tour were just lovely. Roger also enjoys touring so much more so I'd know that it would be a good show - he's put 110% of himself into it (not to say that Brian wouldn't but his interests appear to lie far outside of music these days). I know that it would be a truly great show (with some awesome guests, no doubt). Unfortunately as completely thrilling as the show itself would be, I'd probably do/say something stupid or throw up all over him once I got backstage. I do not do well meeting celebrities (I won't recount my experience meeting Andrew McCarthy here, but needless to say, it was embarassing...for both of us!) I'd be willing to try to hold it together for a chance to meet Roger though! Fun question, Grateful! I'm interested to see everyone else's answers! Kathleen |
Sebastian 06.04.2010 15:30 |
I'd pick Roger. They're both fantastic singers but IMO Rog's a bit better. Moreover, I think Dr May would spend several minutes preaching about animal welfare (which is a great cause and a very important matter, but that's a concert not a conference), while Rog would stick to the music. Plus, if he brings Treana Morris it's a huge plus. Brian's solo band lost its heart and soul when Cozy died. Plus I've never been too fond of Spike and I suppose he'd be with Brian instead of Rog. Mike Crossley, OTOH, is brill. In terms of visual show, it's also nice to see Rog playing guitar for a change. As you can see in my website, I love those castling/relaying occasions. If Brian played other instruments in his solo concert (e.g. piano, drums, koto), perhaps I'd reconsider, but otherwise the feeling of an uncharacteristic situation plus the other reasons listed (Mike vs Spike, no more Cozy, their vocal abilities, preaching) are more than enough for me to go with the blondrummer. |
Pim Derks 06.04.2010 16:42 |
Boy that would be a hard one. I've seen Brian live once already as a solo-artist, so I'd pick Roger just for that reason alone. I just wish he wouldn't perform with the crappy SAS Band and get his 1994 or 1999 band back together - they were quite good. Such a shame that he never used Interlude In Constantinople as the intro of his solo shows (though I know a lot of bootlegs from the 1999 tour give the intro soundeffects that name). Imagine lots of smoke and then the drums coming in and Roger singing "Goooood Evening Londooooon, the best audience in the world we've been told!" and then launchining into No More Fun or something :D |
Dan C. 06.04.2010 17:25 |
I love them both, but Roger wins. In a different set of circumstances, he could have been quite the popular singer in the '70s. |
*goodco* 06.04.2010 18:52 |
Brian........only because, with front row seats, I might not be able to see Roger due to the angle and drum kit. Yes, I know Roger would be up front a lot, yet from two experiences, I'd take Brian (and plenty of earplugs). Tough hypothetical question, and a thought provoking one at that. The backstage part.......Brian would be such a gentlemen, and would take a few minutes to talk. Roger........well, he might be two sheets at that point, and would be quite disinterested. Could I at least see the set lists first? Please? That could sway my answer. |
brians wig 06.04.2010 18:58 |
It would have to be Roger. Please Sarah, can I join the Roger Girls??? (Yes, I'm a bloke!) ;) |
Vali 06.04.2010 19:04 |
Roger, Roger and ... if I ever had a third opportunity, Brian |
mike hunt 06.04.2010 19:59 |
Brian is my second favorite member of queen, only behind freddie. I still would pick roger if i had the choice between brian and roger solo live. I think roger's voice is better, especially these days. Roger also seems to be into the music scene more than brian is. Roger an underated vocalist, though his songs overall were hit or miss for me, and doesn't hold a candle to what brian did in queen, but if we're talking seeing one of them live in the present i'll go with roger. |
The Real Wizard 07.04.2010 00:00 |
Sebastian wrote: I think Dr May would spend several minutes preaching about animal welfare (which is a great cause and a very important matter, but that's a concert not a conference) Brian has been pro-animal rights for decades and never once has he preached about it on stage. What makes you think he'd start doing it now, especially since he now has his soapbox to rant on? As for the original question, I think I'd pick Roger, as he'd probably be the one to pick a few more obscure songs. |
Sebastian 07.04.2010 00:17 |
Sir GH wrote:Sebastian wrote: I think Dr May would spend several minutes preaching about animal welfare (which is a great cause and a very important matter, but that's a concert not a conference)Brian has been pro-animal rights for decades and never once has he preached about it on stage. What makes you think he'd start doing it now, especially since he now has his soapbox to rant on? Just a hunch. It could be wrong, of course, but I wouldn't risk it. I'd prefer to go to Roger's gig where I'm almost positive there'll be less talk more music. By the way there are loads of things people haven't done for decades and it doesn't make it impossible for them to start from one moment to another. Freddie's facial hair had been growing since his teenage years (I reckon) and not once had he given a concert with moustache. Until one day he did it. And then two, and then three, and then many more. Theoretically, the same could happen here: Brian could give his first pro-animal speech during a concert. It could be as short as two minutes, or as long as half an hour. And then more would follow... it's not impossible. Of course, maybe it'll never happen, but again, I wouldn't risk it. That's not reason enough not to go to a concert, but one of the several reasons why I'd prefer going to Roger's. If it's Brian or nothing, Brian; if it's Brian or Roger, Roger. |
The Real Wizard 07.04.2010 00:24 |
Sebastian wrote: By the way there are loads of things people haven't done for decades and it doesn't make it impossible for them to start from one moment to another. Freddie's facial hair had been growing since his teenage years (I reckon) and not once had he given a concert with moustache. By that logic, then Roger's concert could include a 20 minute rant about Afghanistan during an interlude in The Unblinking Eye. Or maybe he could bring out Mick Jagger and start an orgy on stage. Anything's possible, right? |
Sebastian 07.04.2010 01:27 |
Sir GH wrote:Sebastian wrote: By the way there are loads of things people haven't done for decades and it doesn't make it impossible for them to start from one moment to another. Freddie's facial hair had been growing since his teenage years (I reckon) and not once had he given a concert with moustache.By that logic, then Roger's concert could include a 20 minute rant about Afghanistan during an interlude in The Unblinking Eye. Or maybe he could bring out Mick Jagger and start an orgy on stage. Anything's possible, right? Exactly. And the odds for one thing or the other to happen are entirely subjective (hence the use of a cute little verb which is called to think, which is etymologically related to imagination [i.e. stuff that may or may not happen]). Since I think the possibility of Brian talking about animal welfare is stronger than Roger talking politics or having an orgy, and since I think Roger's got a better voice than Brian, and since I think Roger would have Mike Crossley (whom I admire) on keys rather than Spike (whom I'm not fond of), and since I think there's a stronger chance for Roger to play guitar than for Brian to play piano (thus pleasing my taste for musicians going out of their comfort zone - just look at my website's banner), and since I think (as you do, based on your previous post) Roger would be more likely to sing 'Drowse' than Brian to sing 'Dreamer's Ball', and since I think I wouldn't enjoy very much a Cozy-less BM Band, and since I think I would have a better chance of getting laid after the Roger gig (I'm currently single and I could hit on one of those gorgeous women who would be aroused by him and in desperate need for someone to celebrate with), I think I'd enjoy Roger's concert more than Brian's and, for that reason, I know I'd buy tickets for the blondrummer instead of the doctor. |
Pim Derks 07.04.2010 01:37 |
Oh boy, there we go again... |
tcc 07.04.2010 02:30 |
I will choose Brian's show because he will be doing what he does best - playing the guitar. I like Roger but I still can't sit through the whole session of him singing a Queen song just like I still can't do it for Paul Rodgers. |
people on streets 07.04.2010 02:42 |
ROGER AAAAAHHHH....! |
FlorianS 07.04.2010 03:49 |
I would go to see the Brian show. Saw him in '93 and '98 and loved both shows. Moreover I prefer Brians solo stuff to Rogers and prefer most of the Brian stuff which could be played / was played in the past to the stuff Roger would probably do. |
master marathon runner 07.04.2010 05:18 |
Kathleen ! - What are you thinking of ?!, you love roger so much and you don't have 'Fun in Space' ?, why, it's probably his best album, get out today and get it girl ! Master Marathon Runner |
Princess140686 07.04.2010 05:24 |
ROGER without hesitating !!! I already prefer his Voice and he is my second prefer Member of QUEEN. The one that I prefer ?? FREDDIE naturally....and for more than 25 Years !!!!!! (sorry for my bad English) |
rob s 07.04.2010 05:58 |
Being in the US, my choice would be for Roger, as he has never graced these shores with a solo performance before, and we have had the opportunity to see Brian. I'm curious to hear from people who have already seen both perform solo, who would they prefer to see again? |
Holly2003 07.04.2010 06:02 |
Seen Brian's solo show at the RAH in 1998, but I've never seen Roger solo. So as long as he wasn't part of The Cross (shudder), I'd vote for Roger. |
dragon-fly 07.04.2010 07:46 |
Sebastian wrote: Brian's solo band lost its heart and soul when Cozy died. Agree wholeheartedly about this. But I'd pick the guitarist. I may get stoned here, but IMHO Brian is a better guitarist among other guitarists than Roger among other drummers. Taylor had a very smart approach to the drums but he's not a rival for mentioned above Powell for example. But I'm not saying that Roger is a bad drummer (no way!). Unblinking Eye is another reason. I don't think it was for good to convert his opinion on politics into a song. It'd be more joyful to listen to Bri's guitar. Only guitar solo alone would be worth it. And if he'd play something from his albums- it'd a be a dream! Hmm, but the best would be to go back in 1992 and attend one of his concerts. :) |
mike hunt 07.04.2010 08:03 |
dragon-fly wrote:Sebastian wrote: Brian's solo band lost its heart and soul when Cozy died.Agree wholeheartedly about this. But I'd pick the guitarist. I may get stoned here, but IMHO Brian is a better guitarist among other guitarists than Roger among other drummers. Taylor had a very smart approach to the drums but he's not a rival for mentioned above Powell for example. But I'm not saying that Roger is a bad drummer (no way!). Unblinking Eye is another reason. I don't think it was for good to convert his opinion on politics into a song. It'd be more joyful to listen to Bri's guitar. Only guitar solo alone would be worth it. And if he'd play something from his albums- it'd a be a dream! Hmm, but the best would be to go back in 1992 and attend one of his concerts. :) Why would you get stoned for telling it the way it is...brian was way more influencial than roger. but brian has lost the passion IMO. |
Holly2003 07.04.2010 08:39 |
dragon-fly wrote:Obviously it's a personal preference but I don't mind political issues in songs if it's done well. Unfortunately I don't think Brian or Roger are particularly good at writing political lyrics. Plus it's hard to take them seriously when they don't practice what they preach (such as writing Dear Mr Murdoch then advertising We Will Rock You in The Sun newspaper, or Brian's tirade against billboards, then advertising Absolute Greatest on a series of billboards).Sebastian wrote: Brian's solo band lost its heart and soul when Cozy died.Agree wholeheartedly about this. But I'd pick the guitarist. I may get stoned here, but IMHO Brian is a better guitarist among other guitarists than Roger among other drummers. Taylor had a very smart approach to the drums but he's not a rival for mentioned above Powell for example. But I'm not saying that Roger is a bad drummer (no way!). Unblinking Eye is another reason. I don't think it was for good to convert his opinion on politics into a song. It'd be more joyful to listen to Bri's guitar. Only guitar solo alone would be worth it. And if he'd play something from his albums- it'd a be a dream! Hmm, but the best would be to go back in 1992 and attend one of his concerts. :) |
dragon-fly 07.04.2010 09:23 |
Holly2003 wrote: Obviously it's a personal preference but I don't mind political issues in songs if it's done well. Unfortunately I don't think Brian or Roger are particularly good at writing political lyrics. Plus it's hard to take them seriously when they don't practice what they preach (such as writing Dear Mr Murdoch then advertising We Will Rock You in The Sun newspaper, or Brian's tirade against billboards, then advertising Absolute Greatest on a series of billboards). I don't mind political issues in songs in general. But I didn't like Roger's effort- such truth. I like when lyrics are more wise about this subject. A bit hidden meaning, or sarcastic. It sounds much better as a song. |
PrincessofTaylor 07.04.2010 10:55 |
master marathon runner wrote: Kathleen ! - What are you thinking of ?!, you love roger so much and you don't have 'Fun in Space' ?, why, it's probably his best album, get out today and get it girl ! Master Marathon Runner I know! I bought the other three all at once and for some reason just didn't put Fun in Space in my Amazon cart too. I've heard all the songs, I just need to get my act together and buy the darn thing! |
PrincessofTaylor 07.04.2010 11:33 |
dragon-fly wrote:Holly2003 wrote: Obviously it's a personal preference but I don't mind political issues in songs if it's done well. Unfortunately I don't think Brian or Roger are particularly good at writing political lyrics. Plus it's hard to take them seriously when they don't practice what they preach (such as writing Dear Mr Murdoch then advertising We Will Rock You in The Sun newspaper, or Brian's tirade against billboards, then advertising Absolute Greatest on a series of billboards).I don't mind political issues in songs in general. But I didn't like Roger's effort- such truth. I like when lyrics are more wise about this subject. A bit hidden meaning, or sarcastic. It sounds much better as a song. I agree with you both on this one. Political songs are okay when done right. Roger's problem with lyrics is that he's so straightforward and literal. Some of my favorite songs he's written have a more veiled political commentary (Strange Frontier, Say It's Not True, Foreign Sand). Once he backs himself into a lyrical corner and has to rhyme something with Afghanistan, it's hard to take the rest of the song very seriously. I do think that somehow he manages to get away with it though. Like his studio effects (i.e. laughter, scissors, etc.): I always roll my eyes when I listen to the beginning of Touch the Sky, but then I end up smiling and enjoying the rest of the song. I think I might actually miss some of that stuff if he didn't do it! |
GratefulFan 07.04.2010 12:03 |
PrincessofTaylor wrote: I'd choose Roger. It wouldn't even be a contest. Roger has been my favorite member of the band since I first saw the Montreal '81 show. During Under Pressure, I commented on how they must have had a backing track of David Bowie's vocals, then I realized it was Roger singing and simultaneously playing drums. I was absolutely astonished. I have three of his solo albums (everything but Fun in Space) and think they are all great. I don't have any of Brian's so I wouldn't know any solo songs on that setlist. I'd basically know all of Roger's solo songs. I also think Roger's voice is just wonderful and has improved over the years. His vocals at Band de Lac and during the accoustic portions of the 2008 tour were just lovely. Roger also enjoys touring so much more so I'd know that it would be a good show - he's put 110% of himself into it (not to say that Brian wouldn't but his interests appear to lie far outside of music these days). I know that it would be a truly great show (with some awesome guests, no doubt). Unfortunately as completely thrilling as the show itself would be, I'd probably do/say something stupid or throw up all over him once I got backstage. I do not do well meeting celebrities (I won't recount my experience meeting Andrew McCarthy here, but needless to say, it was embarassing...for both of us!) I'd be willing to try to hold it together for a chance to meet Roger though! Fun question, Grateful! I'm interested to see everyone else's answers! Kathleen I was backstage once at a Triumph concert (big deal in Canada) in 1984 or 1985 in one of those situations where the roadies pick you and you and you to go back out of the audience. I was so nervous it was stupid, and all I could manage to do was stand around and pretend to be profoundly bored with the whole situation until Rik Emmett actually approached me, at which point I literally bolted straight through the curtains blocking the restricted area and ran terrified into the blessedly celebrity free Canadian night where I doubled over laughing at my own retardedness. A couple of years ago I did the profoundly bored routine while standing near Jim Cuddy of Blue Rodeo at an outside venue just before their show. Some personal lameness apparently endures for life. I think Brian would be easy to meet because he's really humanized himself via the soapbox etc. |
PrincessofTaylor 07.04.2010 12:22 |
GratefulFan wrote:PrincessofTaylor wrote: I'd choose Roger. It wouldn't even be a contest. Roger has been my favorite member of the band since I first saw the Montreal '81 show. During Under Pressure, I commented on how they must have had a backing track of David Bowie's vocals, then I realized it was Roger singing and simultaneously playing drums. I was absolutely astonished. I have three of his solo albums (everything but Fun in Space) and think they are all great. I don't have any of Brian's so I wouldn't know any solo songs on that setlist. I'd basically know all of Roger's solo songs. I also think Roger's voice is just wonderful and has improved over the years. His vocals at Band de Lac and during the acoustic portions of the 2008 tour were just lovely. Roger also enjoys touring so much more so I'd know that it would be a good show - he's put 110% of himself into it (not to say that Brian wouldn't but his interests appear to lie far outside of music these days). I know that it would be a truly great show (with some awesome guests, no doubt). Unfortunately as completely thrilling as the show itself would be, I'd probably do/say something stupid or throw up all over him once I got backstage. I do not do well meeting celebrities (I won't recount my experience meeting Andrew McCarthy here, but needless to say, it was embarassing...for both of us!) I'd be willing to try to hold it together for a chance to meet Roger though! Fun question, Grateful! I'm interested to see everyone else's answers! KathleenI was backstage once at a Triumph concert (big deal in Canada) in 1984 or 1985 in one of those situations where the roadies pick you and you and you to go back out of the audience. I was so nervous it was stupid, and all I could manage to do was stand around and pretend to be profoundly bored with the whole situation until Rik Emmett actually approached me, at which point I literally bolted straight through the curtains blocking the restricted area and ran terrified into the blessedly celebrity free Canadian night where I doubled over laughing at my own retardedness. A couple of years ago I did the profoundly bored routine while standing near Jim Cuddy of Blue Rodeo at an outside venue just before their show. Some personal lameness apparently endures for life. I think Brian would be easy to meet because he's really humanized himself via the soapbox etc. Very true - as silly as it sounds, I feel like I kind of "know" Brian from his soapbox. I'd at least have a few go to topics that I'd know would interest him (even as dreadfully boring as I'd find those topics). Roger, on the other hand, I'd probably start babbling about how much I love the song Two Sharp Pencils, he'd think I was making fun of him, and it would be all downhill from there. Then again, everyone who has met Roger has said that he really is a genuinely nice guy so maybe my complete and utter awkwardness would amuse him! Re: Andrew McCarthy (of 80s movies fame). I saw him in a play in NYC in 1999. I was so excited beforehand and then afterwards heard a lady talking about waiting by the stage door so I decided I needed to wait as well. Andrew came out (to a rather disappointedly small crowd) and started signing autographs. When he got to me, all I could think of was this horribly cheesy made for TV movie that I had seen recently in which he starred so I told him how great I thought he was in that. He gave me this look of absolute disgust and was like, "Really?" At that point, my friend started explaining that I really was a big fan and I loved all his movies and I wasn't kidding. Then I started talking again: I think I mentioned Mannequin and Class (two more really laughable awful movies). He didn't say a single word to me, signed my program without even smiling and moved on. It was so awful! A few years later, I was too embarassed to even take a picture of Neil Diamond when he was 15 feet in front of me. He kept looking at me and smiling, but I just could not get my act together. I have some amazing pictures of him looking the other way (the only time I was brave enough to take the pictures!) Now that I recall those stories, perhaps it is better that I not actually meet Roger or Brian. No good has come from my celebrity meeting experiences! |
master marathon runner 07.04.2010 14:13 |
PrincessofTaylor wrote:master marathon runner wrote: Kathleen ! - What are you thinking of ?!, you love roger so much and you don't have 'Fun in Space' ?, why, it's probably his best album, get out today and get it girl ! Master Marathon RunnerI know! I bought the other three all at once and for some reason just didn't put Fun in Space in my Amazon cart too. I've heard all the songs, I just need to get my act together and buy the darn thing! Good, now dont delay ! |
Holly2003 07.04.2010 14:28 |
GratefulFan wrote:PrincessofTaylor wrote: I'd choose Roger. It wouldn't even be a contest. Roger has been my favorite member of the band since I first saw the Montreal '81 show. During Under Pressure, I commented on how they must have had a backing track of David Bowie's vocals, then I realized it was Roger singing and simultaneously playing drums. I was absolutely astonished. I have three of his solo albums (everything but Fun in Space) and think they are all great. I don't have any of Brian's so I wouldn't know any solo songs on that setlist. I'd basically know all of Roger's solo songs. I also think Roger's voice is just wonderful and has improved over the years. His vocals at Band de Lac and during the accoustic portions of the 2008 tour were just lovely. Roger also enjoys touring so much more so I'd know that it would be a good show - he's put 110% of himself into it (not to say that Brian wouldn't but his interests appear to lie far outside of music these days). I know that it would be a truly great show (with some awesome guests, no doubt). Unfortunately as completely thrilling as the show itself would be, I'd probably do/say something stupid or throw up all over him once I got backstage. I do not do well meeting celebrities (I won't recount my experience meeting Andrew McCarthy here, but needless to say, it was embarassing...for both of us!) I'd be willing to try to hold it together for a chance to meet Roger though! Fun question, Grateful! I'm interested to see everyone else's answers! KathleenI was backstage once at a Triumph concert (big deal in Canada) in 1984 or 1985 in one of those situations where the roadies pick you and you and you to go back out of the audience. I was so nervous it was stupid, and all I could manage to do was stand around and pretend to be profoundly bored with the whole situation until Rik Emmett actually approached me, at which point I literally bolted straight through the curtains blocking the restricted area and ran terrified into the blessedly celebrity free Canadian night where I doubled over laughing at my own retardedness. A couple of years ago I did the profoundly bored routine while standing near Jim Cuddy of Blue Rodeo at an outside venue just before their show. Some personal lameness apparently endures for life. I think Brian would be easy to meet because he's really humanized himself via the soapbox etc. A missed opportunity: think of the groupie lifestyle you ran away from that night -- drugs, sex, rock and roll, sandwiches cut into triangles, amps that go up to eleven, 'Dublin' noise reduction-- the list goes on ;) |
sunhippieashlyn 07.04.2010 15:15 |
well, I was about to say Brian's concert, but when you mentioned that he might bring Kerry, I thought, uh....I'll pass. I pick Roger! <3 he'd be amazing to see in concert, playing the drums and singing. of course, either would be awesome to see...... great post topic! www.imgoingslightlyqueen.webs.com -Ashlyn :) |
GratefulFan 07.04.2010 16:30 |
Holly2003 wrote:GratefulFan wrote: I was backstage once at a Triumph concert (big deal in Canada) in 1984 or 1985 in one of those situations where the roadies pick you and you and you to go back out of the audience. I was so nervous it was stupid, and all I could manage to do was stand around and pretend to be profoundly bored with the whole situation until Rik Emmett actually approached me, at which point I literally bolted straight through the curtains blocking the restricted area and ran terrified into the blessedly celebrity free Canadian night where I doubled over laughing at my own retardedness. A couple of years ago I did the profoundly bored routine while standing near Jim Cuddy of Blue Rodeo at an outside venue just before their show. Some personal lameness apparently endures for life. I think Brian would be easy to meet because he's really humanized himself via the soapbox etc.A missed opportunity: think of the groupie lifestyle you ran away from that night -- drugs, sex, rock and roll, sandwiches cut into triangles, amps that go up to eleven, 'Dublin' noise reduction-- the list goes on ;) I knooowwww! I'm such an idiot. I LOVE those little triangle sandwiches! You said amps that go up to eleven, and and now we must all watch Triumph together. Kathleen you'll like this because the drummer is wearing a Roger shirt, sort of, in a my-stripes-are-bigger-than-your-stripes kind of way. And this one, I mean, from 5:21 to 5:44, just stop it. Emmett is like Steve Perry, but cool. I totally should have tried the, uh, chicken salad. :p |
GratefulFan 07.04.2010 16:43 |
sunhippieashlyn wrote: well, I was about to say Brian's concert, but when you mentioned that he might bring Kerry, I thought, uh....I'll pass. I pick Roger! <3 he'd be amazing to see in concert, playing the drums and singing. of course, either would be awesome to see...... great post topic! www.imgoingslightlyqueen.webs.com -Ashlyn :) I checked out your site. :) |
PrincessofTaylor 07.04.2010 17:52 |
GratefulFan wrote:Holly2003 wrote:I knooowwww! I'm such an idiot. I LOVE those little triangle sandwiches! You said amps that go up to eleven, and and now we must all watch Triumph together. Kathleen you'll like this because the drummer is wearing a Roger shirt, sort of, in a my-stripes-are-bigger-than-your-stripes kind of way. And this one, I mean, from 5:21 to 5:44, just stop it. Emmett is like Steve Perry, but cool. I totally should have tried the, uh, chicken salad. :pGratefulFan wrote: I was backstage once at a Triumph concert (big deal in Canada) in 1984 or 1985 in one of those situations where the roadies pick you and you and you to go back out of the audience. I was so nervous it was stupid, and all I could manage to do was stand around and pretend to be profoundly bored with the whole situation until Rik Emmett actually approached me, at which point I literally bolted straight through the curtains blocking the restricted area and ran terrified into the blessedly celebrity free Canadian night where I doubled over laughing at my own retardedness. A couple of years ago I did the profoundly bored routine while standing near Jim Cuddy of Blue Rodeo at an outside venue just before their show. Some personal lameness apparently endures for life. I think Brian would be easy to meet because he's really humanized himself via the soapbox etc.A missed opportunity: think of the groupie lifestyle you ran away from that night -- drugs, sex, rock and roll, sandwiches cut into triangles, amps that go up to eleven, 'Dublin' noise reduction-- the list goes on ;) Oh no - please don't think I'm just some ridiculous fan girl! I happen to think that Roger looked absolutely ridiculous throughout the entire 1980s including when he wore that shirt! I did enjoy the songs though - I'd not heard either before. And he totally sounds like Steve Perry (especially in the second song - great voice!) |
dvasq23 07.04.2010 20:27 |
Brian! no question about it. Nothing gets a the crows going more than a wall of AC30s. Brians also had more hit songs in Queen than Roger did. I could watch Brian May by himself doing Brighton Rock Solo and that would be enough for a great show |
gatto 07.04.2010 23:22 |
Brian es mucho mejor musico que Roger,dentro de Queen demostró en ocasiones ser igual o mejor que Freddie en varios albumes de la banda.Pero Personalmente Roger es mi integrante favorito,su carrera solista es mejor que la de Brian, su musica es mas exotica, pero Brian ha hecho toures fantasticos alrededor del mundo cosa que Roger solo se limita a Europa. Pero resumiendo. Dentro de Queen Brian es mejor, pero en solitario me atrae mas la musica de Roger. |
skip 08.04.2010 01:13 |
I'd rather see Brian. I'd rather hear Brian sing the songs he wrote that Freddie sang and hear Brian sing the songs that he wrote and sang on the Queen lps. |
mike hunt 08.04.2010 02:29 |
Holly2003 wrote:dragon-fly wrote:Obviously it's a personal preference but I don't mind political issues in songs if it's done well. Unfortunately I don't think Brian or Roger are particularly good at writing political lyrics. Plus it's hard to take them seriously when they don't practice what they preach (such as writing Dear Mr Murdoch then advertising We Will Rock You in The Sun newspaper, or Brian's tirade against billboards, then advertising Absolute Greatest on a series of billboards).Sebastian wrote: Brian's solo band lost its heart and soul when Cozy died.Agree wholeheartedly about this. But I'd pick the guitarist. I may get stoned here, but IMHO Brian is a better guitarist among other guitarists than Roger among other drummers. Taylor had a very smart approach to the drums but he's not a rival for mentioned above Powell for example. But I'm not saying that Roger is a bad drummer (no way!). Unblinking Eye is another reason. I don't think it was for good to convert his opinion on politics into a song. It'd be more joyful to listen to Bri's guitar. Only guitar solo alone would be worth it. And if he'd play something from his albums- it'd a be a dream! Hmm, but the best would be to go back in 1992 and attend one of his concerts. :) Writing the song celebrity and then appearing on american Idol is another example. |
Wijnand 08.04.2010 05:19 |
Interesting question! I would choose Roger, only because I've never been to a solo show of him... |
GratefulFan 08.04.2010 11:27 |
PrincessofTaylor wrote: Oh no - please don't think I'm just some ridiculous fan girl! I happen to think that Roger looked absolutely ridiculous throughout the entire 1980s including when he wore that shirt! I did enjoy the songs though - I'd not heard either before. And he totally sounds like Steve Perry (especially in the second song - great voice!) Of course I don't think you're a fangirl! I was just inviting you to my Triumph concert. :) Emmett, Triumph and those songs are all Canadian legends. One of more than a few bands for whom it's a crime that they're not classics a lot of other places. Oh...irony. 'Lay it on the Line' just started on the radio. LOL Anyway, Emmett quit the band in the late 80's to go solo and branched off in a whole bunch of different directions. He's a guitarist's guitarist and is highly respected and award winning etc. He still plays, and also teaches at a college of applied arts and technology in Toronto. He's kind of like Brian May in many ways - highly regarded, soft spoken gentleman guitarist kind of thing. And I totally should have been able to say "Oh, yes, Rik Emmett! Had a great chat with him backstage in 84/85!" but all I got is a the story of a sudden utterly goofy urge to look at my watch and drag my face through curtains at high speed while he was still 6 or 7 paces away. |
GratefulFan 08.04.2010 11:27 |
mike hunt wrote: Writing the song celebrity and then appearing on american Idol is another example. Yeah, that's a big one for me. |
PrincessofTaylor 08.04.2010 11:58 |
GratefulFan wrote:
PrincessofTaylor wrote: Oh no - please don't think I'm just some ridiculous fan girl! I happen to think that Roger looked absolutely ridiculous throughout the entire 1980s including when he wore that shirt! I did enjoy the songs though - I'd not heard either before. And he totally sounds like Steve Perry (especially in the second song - great voice!)Of course I don't think you're a fangirl! I was just inviting you to my Triumph concert. :) Emmett, Triumph and those songs are all Canadian legends. One of more than a few bands for whom it's a crime that they're not classics a lot of other places. Oh...irony. 'Lay it on the Line' just started on the radio. LOL Anyway, Emmett quit the band in the late 80's to go solo and branched off in a whole bunch of different directions. He's a guitarist's guitarist and is highly respected and award winning etc. He still plays, and also teaches at a college of applied arts and technology in Toronto. He's kind of like Brian May in many ways - highly regarded, soft spoken gentleman guitarist kind of thing. And I totally should have been able to say "Oh, yes, Rik Emmett! Had a great chat with him backstage in 84/85!" but all I got is a the story of a sudden utterly goofy urge to look at my watch and drag my face through curtains at high speed while he was still 6 or 7 paces away. Invent a good story - we won't tell anyone [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img] |
GratefulFan 08.04.2010 12:52 |
Thus far the tally is Roger 15 and Brian 6. Notable enough that a guy can come way out from the back of the stage from behind a drum kit and be noticed on his own merits. Lots of different reasons given for the votes too, which was great. |
PrincessofTaylor 11.05.2010 10:51 |
master marathon runner wrote: Kathleen ! - What are you thinking of ?!, you love roger so much and you don't have 'Fun in Space' ?, why, it's probably his best album, get out today and get it girl ! Master Marathon Runner I finally got around to buying Fun in Space! I'm so glad I did! I'd rate it similar to Happiness? in that there aren't any awesome tracks, but there aren't any real duds either. I particularily like No Violins and Good Times are Now! (And Let's Get Crazy and Laugh or Cry) (And Airhead is fun too) - so basically the entire album since it's only 10 songs! |
andreas_mercury 11.05.2010 11:24 |
i think, to answer the question in the thread title, it will be roger that dies first ..... i do not want to be morbid but if you watch all documentaries, he is ageing much faster than Brian and has a very ominos, very eerie twitch in his mouth when he tries to talk for too long, it means he is dying and hiding it the way Freddie did it is very sad. :( to watch him when he talks and know we have not got him for long |
lifetimefanofqueen 17.06.2010 11:28 |
ummmm.................... BRIAN, I love that man, he is awesome. I also love Roger but I prefer Brian XD Brian forever XD XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX kisses and hugs XD XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX to one of the best men that ever lived XD XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Wiley 17.06.2010 12:49 |
Roger's the better singer and he has more cool solo songs. Eventhough Brian's Back to the Light is better than most of Roger's work, I guess I would enjoy a Roger show more than I would enjoy a Brian show. I had my Brian fix with the QPR shows (acoustic set, Guitar solo, Last Horizon, etc.) and also, If I went to a Brian show I'd never get a chance to listen to songs like Tenement Funster, Ride the Wild Wind, Man on Fire, I'm In Love With My Car live... however unlikely it may be, I'd love to hear ANYTHING from Fun In Space played live. Also, Roger's versions of Queen's songs are better than Brian's. The Show Must Go On and We Will Rock You ("industrial" version) spring to mind. He even pulls off awesome renditions of songs like A kind of Magic and I Want to Break Free, which I didn't enjoy much with Queen. Throw in a couple of Led Zep or other Rock and Roll covers and you're in for a great night! PS: This may or may not have something to do with Roger being nicer to me when signing my autograph back in 2005 :P. (So, you were in a hurry, Brian?? Guess what, Roger was too!) |
andreas_mercury 17.06.2010 12:57 |
to i already said though, in respond to the -actual topic- of the thread, i think that roger is the first to die :'( it will be a sad day too but you cant even deny the symptoms |
Bo Rhap 17.06.2010 15:59 |
Being as i have saw Brian twice and Roger once,i should go and see Roger, But i'm a greedy bastard and will go and see both of them. |