QueenZone discussion #1218445

tcc wrote: This site always get "attacked" by funny newbies who post weird things.  I wonder if this type of thing also happens in other forums.

      tcc wrote:   This site always get "attacked" by funny newbies who post weird things.  I wonder if this type of thing also happens in other forums.  

Vali wrote: don't want any other +frontman again, really, although I enjoyed Paul's job. I'd like Roger and Brian to perform together with no one else. Let there be Spike and Jamie etc as backing musicians, but no guests singers.

Mr Mercury wrote: Some do, but not to the extent this site does. It seems to attract more than its fair share of idiots whose souol function in life is to post inane drivel.......

Thunderbolt wrote: Didn't Brian make a comment once about how he'd never go completely unplugged? I agree, it'd be very cool to hear an entire Queen acoustic show, though.

Treasure Moment wrote: a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.

Treasure Moment wrote: a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.

Zebonka12 wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote: a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.

What procedures would you put in place to avoid it sounding like shit?    

Funky Horsie wrote: IN THE UNDERWORLD, MAYBE

Treasure Moment wrote:

Funky Horsie wrote: IN THE UNDERWORLD, MAYBE

in the real world you skinny nerd, the real world.

GratefulFan wrote:

  Mr Mercury wrote: Some do, but not to the extent this site does. It seems to attract more than its fair share of idiots whose souol function in life is to post inane drivel.......

See "Google" and "Sonic Boom Tour".

Treasure Moment wrote: TM is the best band in the world right now, thats not arrogance, its the truth.

skip wrote: KISS "Sonic Boom Over Europe" 2010 Tour May and June 2010

andreas_mercury wrote:

  skip wrote: KISS "Sonic Boom Over Europe" 2010 Tour May and June 2010

i will be at the Malmo show

Russian Headlong wrote: This thread has gone totally off topic. What I was trying to get were fans preferances as to who  who if any Brian and Roger should het to front the band (if PR won't) in any future gigs. I agree BMand RT can sing some material but the main bulk of the songs would benefit from a new vocalist and I would like either Justin Hawkins or Jeff Scott Soto if PR is not available.

Rubbersuit wrote: They should get Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons to fill for Freddie and John.   There... we're back on topic. Oh, and the TM sissy fight in this thread is pure gold!

PauloPanucci wrote: Queen+Susan Boyle?

Zebonka12 wrote: If they do, I want the smallest lineup possible.  No guest vocalist, no backup singers, no cast of little African people banging drums during WWRY ...  seriously, no more than 5 people on that stage at any point of the show.

Treasure Moment wrote: its funny how this andreas mercury guy made an account just to pretend being a ex member lol

Treasure Moment wrote:

PauloPanucci wrote: Queen+Susan Boyle?

fuck that, no one deserves to sing in queen besides freddie, all these garbage creatures have no buisness being anywhere close to queen.

Major Tom wrote: Queen + Gary Cherone. Andreas: Är det nu så att du är Andreas, svara på svenska här, så får du din upprättelse.

Major Tom wrote: Queen + Gary Cherone.

JacquesDaniels wrote: No no no... What we're really waiting for is Queen + Treasure Moment. Right? Treasure Moment wrote: fuck that, no one deserves to sing in queen besides freddie, all these garbage creatures have no buisness being anywhere close to queen.

Major Tom wrote: Haha, du är bara förjävla patetisk.

JacquesDaniels wrote: No no no... What we're really waiting for is Queen + Treasure Moment. Right?

Major Tom wrote: I GOT IT, I GOT IT!!! Fuck Brian and Roger. Treasure Moment + W.K. Mahler is what the world needs.

Major Tom wrote: Haha, och svaret blev på dagisnivå. - Kan du va!

vadenuez wrote:

JacquesDaniels wrote: No no no... What we're really waiting for is Queen + Treasure Moment. Right? Treasure Moment wrote: fuck that, no one deserves to sing in queen besides freddie, all these garbage creatures have no buisness being anywhere close to queen.

... his own words...

Treasure Moment wrote:

Zebonka12 wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote: a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.

What procedures would you put in place to avoid it sounding like shit?    

TM is the best band in the world right now, thats not arrogance, its the truth.

redspecialusa wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote:  

      Zebonka12 wrote:      

              Treasure Moment wrote:       a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.      

What procedures would you put in place to avoid it sounding like shit?                      

TM is the best band in the world right now, thats not arrogance, its the truth.

It's true Z, Treasure Moment is the greatest band to ever grace the SPECIAL OLYMPICS. "TM is the best band in the world right now..." FUCK OFF. Jonny Rotten would do better collaborating with Queen than any of you fucking hacks would.

Russian Headlong wrote: This thread has gone totally off topic. What I was trying to get were fans preferances as to who  who if any Brian and Roger should het to front the band (if PR won't) in any future gigs. I agree BMand RT can sing some material but the main bulk of the songs would benefit from a new vocalist and I would like either Justin Hawkins or Jeff Scott Soto if PR is not available.

Rubbersuit wrote: They should get Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons to fill for Freddie and John.   There... we're back on topic. Oh, and the TM sissy fight in this thread is pure gold!

skip wrote:

  Rubbersuit wrote: They should get Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons to fill for Freddie and John.     There... we're back on topic.   Oh, and the TM sissy fight in this thread is pure gold!  

Paul Stanley - lead vocals + rhythm guitar Gene Simmons - lead vocals + bass guitar Brian May - lead vocals + lead guitar Roger Taylor - lead vocals + drums Lots of egos, but that would sound great. Paul, Gene, and Brian are friends. Paul and Roger were friends in the '70s. Paul and Gene like Queen's music and Brian likes KISS' music.  Don't know about Roger.

vadenuez wrote: And they should call themselves "Quiss"

Zebonka12 wrote: If they do, I want the smallest lineup possible.  No guest vocalist, no backup singers, no cast of little African people banging drums during WWRY ...  seriously, no more than 5 people on that stage at any point of the show. Don't sink into your Elvis years without a fight boys, you can still go out and do something interesting.  Play small venues if you have to - at least it'd be artistically justifiable ...

Treasure Moment wrote: are you easily fooled? the guy is just pretending to be an ex member, he is probably not even swedish.

Holly2003 wrote:

  Major Tom wrote: Queen + Gary Cherone.

Noooooooooooooo!!!!!!

andreas_mercury wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote: are you easily fooled? the guy is just pretending to be an ex member, he is probably not even swedish.  

  i will say to you this my friend - after i met you i wanted to stop being swedish.  

Treasure Moment wrote: a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.

August R. wrote:

      Treasure Moment wrote:   a collaboration between TM and roger+brian would lead to the closest thing to a Queen sound. It would sound 100 times more like Queen progression than the latest album.  

But your drum machine is so much more accurate than Roger. No need for him. And the guitar playing... well, perhaps Brian could play some ukulele with you to give your music more depth??

Treasure Moment wrote:

andreas_mercury wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote: are you easily fooled? the guy is just pretending to be an ex member, he is probably not even swedish.  

  i will say to you this my friend - after i met you i wanted to stop being swedish.  

its funny how long you have pretended to be an ex member haha

  mooghead wrote: Brian May - Guitar, screwed up face, thinking about space     Roger Taylor - Drums, thinking he doesnt look as old and fat as he is, still being cool regardless   Anyone else - doesn't matter who, will still be shit. Call it a day FFS.  

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Sure, but KISS music is fantastically juvenile, neither Paul or Gene are held in any regard as musicians, and there has always been doubt if they even play live.  I know everybody does overdubs for live albums, but KISS' career took off with Alive.  If they played 20% of what ended up on that record I'd be shocked.  FWIW, fantastic showmen, excellent businessmen, decent songwriters, but pandering to the stupid young boy market forever turns me off of them.  That's just me though.  But if we're talking about sharing a stage with Brian and Roger as far as musicianship goes, Paul Stanley is perhaps a decent rhythm guitarist in a live situation, Gene Simmons is an adequate bassist.  If you believe they're held in the same regard as Brian and Roger even today, I can't answer that with anything but incredulousness.  

skip wrote: Also false info about what is live and what was fixed in the studio on the "Alive" lp.  FYI, "Alive" has far less overdubs than the cut and paste "Queen Live Killers".

BTW, if you want to listen to something "fantastically juvenile" try listening to "Fat Bottomed Girls" or "Bicycle Race".

I'd rather have Eric Singer be the drummer over Roger Taylor any day.  Eric drums circles around Roger.  That's why Brian asked Eric to be the drummer on his solo tour and to perform with Queen a few times.

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: I'm not going to sway you Skip, as you're a big KISS fan, and shouldn't be ashamed about it.  Unless you're over 14 years old :)  For my money, KISS were fantastic showmen, average musicians (original lineup) and their demographic was the teenage boy discovering girls and hitting puberty market, with sexist, ridiculous songs and videos with no sense of wit in their writing.  Fat Bottomed Girls and Lick it Up (to cherry pick) exemplify this.  FBG is a humorous look at a young guy getting it on with a nanny.  Lick it Up?  Pretty straightforward, no cleverness.  There is more musical genius in Bicycle Race (what's juvenile about it?) than the entire KISS catalogue.  For the record, I spent 10 seconds and came up with this review for Paul Stanley as the Phantom.  Here's a sample, many others like it ) not from KISS fans either as they'd have him being a better singer than Pavarotti.

andreas_mercury wrote: i like lots of kiss songs but to phantom of the opera .. his performence was shit.

Sir GH wrote:

                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                                                                                                                                                               Also false info about what is live and what was fixed in the studio on the "Alive" lp.  FYI, "Alive" has far less overdubs than the cut and paste "Queen Live Killers".                                                              

Nonsense.  The producer Eddie Kramer has said the only thing live about Kiss Alive was the drums, while there are plenty of audience recordings of Queen from 1979 that match Live Killers perfectly.

BTW, if you want to listen to something "fantastically juvenile" try listening to "Fat Bottomed Girls" or "Bicycle Race".

Bicycle Race is far more musically complex than anything Kiss ever wrote.  You're really showing your ignorance now.

I'd rather have Eric Singer be the drummer over Roger Taylor any day.  Eric drums circles around Roger.  That's why Brian asked Eric to be the drummer on his solo tour and to perform with Queen a few times.

I didn't know you were at the meeting.  Tell us more, oh holder of all knowledge of things unknown to us peasants.

skip wrote:

Sir GH wrote:

skip wrote: Also false info about what is live and what was fixed in the studio on the "Alive" lp.  FYI, "Alive" has far less overdubs than the cut and paste "Queen Live Killers".

Nonsense.  The producer Eddie Kramer has said the only thing live about Kiss Alive was the drums, while there are plenty of audience recordings of Queen from 1979 that match Live Killers perfectly.

BTW, if you want to listen to something "fantastically juvenile" try listening to "Fat Bottomed Girls" or "Bicycle Race".

Bicycle Race is far more musically complex than anything Kiss ever wrote.  You're really showing your ignorance now.

I'd rather have Eric Singer be the drummer over Roger Taylor any day.  Eric drums circles around Roger.  That's why Brian asked Eric to be the drummer on his solo tour and to perform with Queen a few times.

I didn't know you were at the meeting.  Tell us more, oh holder of all knowledge of things unknown to us peasants.

RE:  Kramer was wrong.  I've heard many of the unedited tracks that were recorded for "Alive" and there's not much difference than what appears on the lp.  "Rock And Roll All Nite" is exactly the same.  All that was cut was Paul's longer intro to the song. Kramer also contradicted himself on the VH1 Classic Albums - KISS "Alive" program, by showing an example where Paul was off mic and that had to be fixed.  They didn't record the lp in the studio. It's obvious you know nothing about "Live Killers".  That cd was nothing put a cut and paste job.  That's why the members of Queen hated that lp. "Bicycle Race" - musically complex?  LOL RUSH' music is musically complex. Didn't need to be at any meeting.  Saw/heard clips of Eric drumming in Brian's band and with Queen.  He did an excellent job, per usual. Try reading a book on Queen.  Maybe you'll learn something someday and be able to carry on a proper conversation on a Queen discussion board without making yourself look like the ass you currently are.

tcc wrote:   Why waste time trying to convince Queen fans in a Queen fan site that Queen is inferior to another band ?

  Holly2003 wrote: Livekillers may indeed be a cut and paste job, buts as SirGH pointed out, there are many Queen shows from that period which are just as good, or surpass it. A strange decision made by Queen to do so much editing (and only one or two overdubs e.g. on Don't Stop Me Now) but hardly one that detracts from their reputation. And Bicycle Race may not be as complicated as some Rush stuff, but it is a work of genius compared to Kiss's juvenile 3-chord rock. God, they're shit. Total stank. Proof, if it were needed, that people will buy a turd in a box if it's wrapped in bright colours.

skip wrote: BTW, if you want to listen to something "fantastically juvenile" try listening to "Fat Bottomed Girls" or "Bicycle Race".

skip wrote: It's obvious you know nothing about "Live Killers".

"Bicycle Race" - musically complex?  LOL

Didn't need to be at any meeting.  Saw/heard clips of Eric drumming in Brian's band and with Queen. He did an excellent job, per usual.

Major Tom wrote: Queen + this guy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Na8H1Sg0mfA&feature=related Maybe he's more TM material?

  Holly2003 wrote: Livekillers may indeed be a cut and paste job, buts as SirGH pointed out, there are many Queen shows from that period which are just as good, or surpass it. A strange decision made by Queen to do so much editing (and only one or two overdubs e.g. on Don't Stop Me Now) but hardly one that detracts from their reputation. And Bicycle Race may not be as complicated as some Rush stuff, but it is a work of genius compared to Kiss's juvenile 3-chord rock. God, they're shit. Total stank. Proof, if it were needed, that people will buy a turd in a box if it's wrapped in bright colours.

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:   BTW, if you want to listen to something "fantastically juvenile" try listening to "Fat Bottomed Girls" or "Bicycle Race".  

How are FBG and Bicycle Race juvenile? Are you referring to their content or their music? If you're refering to the music, I disagree as not only was the music complex but the skill level was arguably extremely high. If you're referring to the content, it's subjective, but I don't think that talking about fat bottomed girls or expressing one's desire to ride a  bicycle is automatically juvenile. Not all great art need be about life and death matters. Much of it is about love or lust, such as FBG, or about less significant issues, such as Bicycle Race.  BTW Bicycle Race is IMO amongt the best written songs of all time, so I definitely don't think it's juvenile.

Sir GH wrote:

  skip wrote: It's obvious you know nothing about "Live Killers".

So where's your Live Killers analysis?  We've all done one, right?

"Bicycle Race" - musically complex?  LOL

Yes, musically complex.  You obviously aren't much of a musician (if at all) if you can't recognize the subtle complexities in the song.  Note to self... there is more to music than the lead vocal.

Didn't need to be at any meeting.  Saw/heard clips of Eric drumming in Brian's band and with Queen. He did an excellent job, per usual.

That comment flew right over your head.  I was referring to your comment that suggested Brian preferred Eric to Roger.  It was a SOLO tour, so he didn't take Queen members with him, full stop. It brings me great joy to see you continue to spew your ignorance.

andreas_mercury wrote: link

skip wrote:

Sir GH wrote:

  skip wrote: It's obvious you know nothing about "Live Killers".

So where's your Live Killers analysis?  We've all done one, right?

"Bicycle Race" - musically complex?  LOL

Yes, musically complex.  You obviously aren't much of a musician (if at all) if you can't recognize the subtle complexities in the song.  Note to self... there is more to music than the lead vocal.

Didn't need to be at any meeting.  Saw/heard clips of Eric drumming in Brian's band and with Queen. He did an excellent job, per usual.

That comment flew right over your head.  I was referring to your comment that suggested Brian preferred Eric to Roger.  It was a SOLO tour, so he didn't take Queen members with him, full stop. It brings me great joy to see you continue to spew your ignorance.

Read the analysis of "Live Killers" online from a person who collected the majority of the concerts from that tour and compared them to what was released as "Live Killers".  Not only did they mix choruses and verses from different nights, but they also mixed single words within a sentence from different nights. My comment that Eric Singer played with Queen went right over your ignorant head. Thanks for playing dumb, then again you weren't playing.

Gregsynth wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Sir GH wrote:      

              skip wrote:       It's obvious you know nothing about "Live Killers".      

So where's your Live Killers analysis?  We've all done one, right?    

"Bicycle Race" - musically complex?  LOL

Yes, musically complex.  You obviously aren't much of a musician (if at all) if you can't recognize the subtle complexities in the song.  Note to self... there is more to music than the lead vocal.    

Didn't need to be at any meeting.  Saw/heard clips of Eric drumming in Brian's band and with Queen. He did an excellent job, per usual.

That comment flew right over your head.  I was referring to your comment that suggested Brian preferred Eric to Roger.  It was a SOLO tour, so he didn't take Queen members with him, full stop.   It brings me great joy to see you continue to spew your ignorance.

Read the analysis of "Live Killers" online from a person who collected the majority of the concerts from that tour and compared them to what was released as "Live Killers".  Not only did they mix choruses and verses from different nights, but they also mixed single words within a sentence from different nights.   My comment that Eric Singer played with Queen went right over your ignorant head. Thanks for playing dumb, then again you weren't playing.  

Hate to burst your bubble Skip, but Sir GH wrote that Live Killers analysis you are thinking of.        

andreas_mercury wrote: link

mike hunt wrote: Rush overall was more musically complex, but queen were much more vocally complex by miles and miles.   and also played way more styles than good old  rush.....Kiss shouldn't eve be in this discussion.  A joke of a band.

mike hunt wrote:

  andreas_mercury wrote: link

skip wrote:

  mike hunt wrote:  

      andreas_mercury wrote: link    

at 0:26 yes that is proof he is the greatest singer ever ...... sure thing my friend... i dont hate kiss at all but here is the man that must stick to his own music.

skip wrote: Not only did they mix choruses and verses from different nights, but they also mixed single words within a sentence from different nights.

Amazon wrote: Funky Horsie wrote "Bicycle Race is musically brillant. Nothing short of GENIUS." Couldn't agree more!!! Funky Horsie wrote: There is so much more to music than metric modulations or irregular patterns. A song doesn't necessarily need to be harmonically or rhythmically complex... to be complex. Those are just some of the sides to it, not all. "Take nothing away from Rush, they sure are AMAZING players... but it takes much more than that to "build up" something like Bicycle Race. If the song had no instruments, only the vocal arrangements, that'd be enough and it'd still be GENIUS. All the details on every instrument, every arrangement and how they all entwine. It's truly amazing. It's so much more than just pop music. BESIDES, let's not forget that the same guy who wrote Bicycle Race, also wrote Mustapha, Jealousy, Let Me Entertain You and Don't Stop Me Now... and they're all on the same album. Most bands would kill to be able to write only one of those songs. And this guy writes 5 for the same album. GENIUS." A great post! It's interesting as Jazz is IMO one of Queen's least consistent albums, yet Freddie's work was IMO outstanding. All five of his songs, even Mustapha which IMO was the weakest of his five, were superb, while Don't Stop Me Now and Bicycle Race were among the greatest songs of all time. He was an absolute genius, no doubt about it!

Amazon wrote: Funky Horsie wrote "Bicycle Race is musically brillant. Nothing short of GENIUS." Couldn't agree more!!! Funky Horsie wrote: There is so much more to music than metric modulations or irregular patterns. A song doesn't necessarily need to be harmonically or rhythmically complex... to be complex. Those are just some of the sides to it, not all. "Take nothing away from Rush, they sure are AMAZING players... but it takes much more than that to "build up" something like Bicycle Race. If the song had no instruments, only the vocal arrangements, that'd be enough and it'd still be GENIUS. All the details on every instrument, every arrangement and how they all entwine. It's truly amazing. It's so much more than just pop music. BESIDES, let's not forget that the same guy who wrote Bicycle Race, also wrote Mustapha, Jealousy, Let Me Entertain You and Don't Stop Me Now... and they're all on the same album. Most bands would kill to be able to write only one of those songs. And this guy writes 5 for the same album. GENIUS." A great post! It's interesting as Jazz is IMO one of Queen's least consistent albums, yet Freddie's work was IMO outstanding. All five of his songs, even Mustapha which IMO was the weakest of his five, were superb, while Don't Stop Me Now and Bicycle Race were among the greatest songs of all time. He was an absolute genius, no doubt about it!

mike hunt wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      mike hunt wrote:      

              andreas_mercury wrote: link            

at 0:26 yes that is proof he is the greatest singer ever ...... sure thing my friend... i dont hate kiss at all but here is the man that must stick to his own music.

mike hunt wrote: This guy skip is a real  doozy.....A real tool,   But he loves his Kiss.    But on with the real bands, Queen and rush.  I agree Queen in their heyday have the edge,  though I also have every rush album.  They rock!....two Different type of bands, Can't really compare the two.  

Sir GH wrote:

              skip wrote:       Not only did they mix choruses and verses from different nights, but they also mixed single words within a sentence from different nights.      

The point being discussed is live albums being *recorded* in the studio, not cutting and pasting portions of performances to create a compilation.  Those are two very different things.  Plenty of evidence suggests that a very large portion of Kiss Alive was done in the studio.  At most, a few vocal lines were redone for Live Killers.

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: My mistake in contributing to this thread was assuming Skip was musically knowledgeable.  My bad.  An personally, I've always found male KISS fans to be socially retarded, and pretty juvenile.  The term rock and roll is/was euphemism for fucking.  KISS, with songs like Lick it Up, weren't clever enough to use anything but base lyrics to attract an audience (which they did), and to me they are like rock's Madonna.  Successful in sales and influence, ultimately zero influence historically musically (Rock and roll All Night excepted.)  I'd guess most KISS fans are ugly men who never get laid.  Just a guess though.  :)  Skip?  Or are you and most KISS fans as handsome and well hung as Paul Stanley is talented? :) 

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Skip, Skip, Skip.  When I say "Or are you and most KISS fans as handsome and well hung as Paul Stanley is talented?", that does not mean that I think Paul Stanley is well hung.  It means that a) you and most (all) KISS fans 'are probably not handsome or well hung because b) Paul Stanley isn't talented.  This isn't a KISS form, we can't explain everything for you, get with the game.    

mike hunt wrote: yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.

Amazon wrote:

      mike hunt wrote:   yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.  

Actually, among Queen's post-The Game albums, I think that their best was actually MIH. While Innuendo has some amazing stuff, it's too cold for my liking. Zebonka12 wrote: "I don't understand the need for homophobia here but whatever floats your boat." I don't understand it either. Skip, I don't often attack people over the internet, but with you I'll make an exception. You can love Kiss and hate Queen as much as you want, but if you bring up Freddie's homosexuality in an attack against Queen, then you are nothing but a fucking prick. If you are so insecure in your love of Kiss that you would resort to homophobia, well, then I don't think that Brian, Roger and John would want you as a 'fan.'

skip wrote: Therefore, "LIve Killers" is a cut and paste job plus recorded overdubs, thus not 100% live.

mike hunt wrote: unleashed in the east is a great album,   Not sure if it's live or not though. 

Amazon wrote:

      mike hunt wrote:   yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.  

Actually, among Queen's post-The Game albums, I think that their best was actually MIH. While Innuendo has some amazing stuff, it's too cold for my liking. Zebonka12 wrote: "I don't understand the need for homophobia here but whatever floats your boat." I don't understand it either. Skip, I don't often attack people over the internet, but with you I'll make an exception. You can love Kiss and hate Queen as much as you want, but if you bring up Freddie's homosexuality in an attack against Queen, then you are nothing but a fucking prick. If you are so insecure in your love of Kiss that you would resort to homophobia, well, then I don't think that Brian, Roger and John would want you as a 'fan.'

mike hunt wrote:

  Amazon wrote:  

              mike hunt wrote:       yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.      

Actually, among Queen's post-The Game albums, I think that their best was actually MIH. While Innuendo has some amazing stuff, it's too cold for my liking. Zebonka12 wrote: "I don't understand the need for homophobia here but whatever floats your boat." I don't understand it either. Skip, I don't often attack people over the internet, but with you I'll make an exception. You can love Kiss and hate Queen as much as you want, but if you bring up Freddie's homosexuality in an attack against Queen, then you are nothing but a fucking prick. If you are so insecure in your love of Kiss that you would resort to homophobia, well, then I don't think that Brian, Roger and John would want you as a 'fan.'

we can't be surprised by Skips homophobia....a typical Ignorant kiss fan!....What is this Tool doing on a Queen site?...He obviously isn't a big queen fan. 

mike hunt wrote: Skip said he was born in the 60's....I think he's full of it....I would be shocked if he's older than 14.

Sir GH wrote:

      skip wrote:   Therefore, "LIve Killers" is a cut and paste job plus recorded overdubs, thus not 100% live.  

Now we're getting down to semantics, which is fine.  However, you don't stand a chance for credibility if you're using Kiss Alive to prove your point. No sane, unbiased fan of rock music would ever argue that Kiss Alive is a live album.  Eddie Kramer and even members of Kiss have recently stated that much of it was re-recorded in the studio.  You're making a fool of yourself if you continue with this. Furthermore, if you need to resort to homophobia to prove any of your points, it only exposes how weak your actual arguments are.  Take your trolling somewhere else.  You're not proving anything to anyone, other than your own lack of ability to conduct an intelligent conversation.

Zebonka12 wrote: Let's calm the thread down people - I suggest we just share Youtube links that we think the other party might enjoy.

Funky Horsie wrote: Skip, this is for you.  I get the feeling you'll like this one!

Gregsynth wrote: I guess going by Skip's logic, all male fans of Queen are gay? LMFAO!

skip wrote:

Funky Horsie wrote: Skip, this is for you.  I get the feeling you'll like this one!

Your boyfriend's going to be pissed that you posted his photo on a Queen discussion board. BTW, your ass must hurt all of the time.  Hope he uses a rubber.  You don't want to end up like Freddie.

skip wrote:

  Funky Horsie wrote: Skip, this is for you.  I get the feeling you'll like this one!

Your boyfriend's going to be pissed that you posted his photo on a Queen discussion board. BTW, your ass must hurt all of the time.  Hope he uses a rubber.  You don't want to end up like Freddie.

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

      mike hunt wrote:   yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.  

Actually, among Queen's post-The Game albums, I think that their best was actually MIH. While Innuendo has some amazing stuff, it's too cold for my liking. Zebonka12 wrote: "I don't understand the need for homophobia here but whatever floats your boat." I don't understand it either. Skip, I don't often attack people over the internet, but with you I'll make an exception. You can love Kiss and hate Queen as much as you want, but if you bring up Freddie's homosexuality in an attack against Queen, then you are nothing but a fucking prick. If you are so insecure in your love of Kiss that you would resort to homophobia, well, then I don't think that Brian, Roger and John would want you as a 'fan.'

Queen's my second favorite band, so save your speech. My previous statement was a "generalization" of Queen fans just like Sheer Ass Neck's post concerning KISS fans.

Gregsynth wrote: Skip's assumptions of "All male Queen fans are gay" is almost (if not on par) as STUPID as Treasure Moment saying that "they write catchy music." LMFAO! BTW, why was KISS brought up on QUEENZONE of all places?

skip wrote: From your post it's obvious you know nothing about "Alive" and did not view the VH1 Classic Albums episode covering this lp.  If you had you wouldn't be so ignorant on this topic.

Funky Horsie wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Funky Horsie wrote:   Skip, this is for you.  I get the feeling you'll like this one!  

Your boyfriend's going to be pissed that you posted his photo on a Queen discussion board. BTW, your ass must hurt all of the time.  Hope he uses a rubber.  You don't want to end up like Freddie.

Haha, I wished that guy was my boyfriend, pal. Because I am a Queen fan, therefore I'm as gay as it gets. Just be careful, sweetie. Always back against the wall. I got a feeling that you don't wanna get to know the MEAT CIGAR. Bye, beautiful. Be careful, we homosexual Queen fans are very agressive.

mike hunt wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Funky Horsie wrote:   Skip, this is for you.  I get the feeling you'll like this one!  

Your boyfriend's going to be pissed that you posted his photo on a Queen discussion board. BTW, your ass must hurt all of the time.  Hope he uses a rubber.  You don't want to end up like Freddie.

Ouch,  leave freddie alone.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

                              mike hunt wrote:               yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.              

Actually, among Queen's post-The Game albums, I think that their best was actually MIH. While Innuendo has some amazing stuff, it's too cold for my liking. Zebonka12 wrote: "I don't understand the need for homophobia here but whatever floats your boat." I don't understand it either. Skip, I don't often attack people over the internet, but with you I'll make an exception. You can love Kiss and hate Queen as much as you want, but if you bring up Freddie's homosexuality in an attack against Queen, then you are nothing but a fucking prick. If you are so insecure in your love of Kiss that you would resort to homophobia, well, then I don't think that Brian, Roger and John would want you as a 'fan.'

Queen's my second favorite band, so save your speech. My previous statement was a "generalization" of Queen fans just like Sheer Ass Neck's post concerning KISS fans.

I couldn't care less whether Queen is you second favourite band or not. If you are going to be homophobic, which you are, then I will absolutely not save my speech. You are a disgusting individual. You imply that all male Queen fans are gay which is false of course but also irrelevent. Who cares what the sexuality of male Queen fans is? That's like saying that all Jay-Z fans are black, as if there's something wrong with being black. But, no, you obviously imagine it to be some kind of slur which suggest that you're homophobic, and then you continue to make repulsive comments about it (you're still doing so now) which proves that you are a disgusting homophobe. I don't know what your problem with homosexuality is, perhaps some guy came on you too strongly, but it really shows what a fucking arsehole you are. It also makes me wonder, as a bi woman, why you would be fans of a group which had a gay frontman, if you hate gays so much!

Gregsynth wrote: Skip's assumptions of "All male Queen fans are gay" is almost (if not on par) as STUPID as Treasure Moment saying that "they write catchy music." LMFAO! BTW, why was KISS brought up on QUEENZONE of all places?

mike hunt wrote:

  Gregsynth wrote: Skip's assumptions of "All male Queen fans are gay" is almost (if not on par) as STUPID as Treasure Moment saying that "they write catchy music." LMFAO! BTW, why was KISS brought up on QUEENZONE of all places?

Because skip keeps bringing them up....

Sir GH wrote:

      skip wrote:   From your post it's obvious you know nothing about "Alive" and did not view the VH1 Classic Albums episode covering this lp.  If you had you wouldn't be so ignorant on this topic.  

Eddie Kramer has stated that everything but Ace Frehley's guitar was done in the studio.  I'm inclined to believe the producer (who has nothing to gain/lose) over the band members who are in a position to tell lies in order to maintain a legacy.

Gregsynth wrote: I found this on Wikipedia: Concerning the overdubbing...

skip wrote:

  Amazon wrote:  

      skip wrote:      

              Amazon wrote:              

                                                              mike hunt wrote:                               yes, Freddie's songwriting on Jazz was very strong.  Mustapha is awsome....Jazz is queens least consistent album of the first 8,   but it's way better and more consistant than anything after that.  Except for maybe Innuendo.                              

Actually, among Queen's post-The Game albums, I think that their best was actually MIH. While Innuendo has some amazing stuff, it's too cold for my liking. Zebonka12 wrote: "I don't understand the need for homophobia here but whatever floats your boat." I don't understand it either. Skip, I don't often attack people over the internet, but with you I'll make an exception. You can love Kiss and hate Queen as much as you want, but if you bring up Freddie's homosexuality in an attack against Queen, then you are nothing but a fucking prick. If you are so insecure in your love of Kiss that you would resort to homophobia, well, then I don't think that Brian, Roger and John would want you as a 'fan.'

Queen's my second favorite band, so save your speech. My previous statement was a "generalization" of Queen fans just like Sheer Ass Neck's post concerning KISS fans.

I couldn't care less whether Queen is you second favourite band or not. If you are going to be homophobic, which you are, then I will absolutely not save my speech. You are a disgusting individual. You imply that all male Queen fans are gay which is false of course but also irrelevent. Who cares what the sexuality of male Queen fans is? That's like saying that all Jay-Z fans are black, as if there's something wrong with being black. But, no, you obviously imagine it to be some kind of slur which suggest that you're homophobic, and then you continue to make repulsive comments about it (you're still doing so now) which proves that you are a disgusting homophobe. I don't know what your problem with homosexuality is, perhaps some guy came on you too strongly, but it really shows what a fucking arsehole you are. It also makes me wonder, as a bi woman, why you would be fans of a group which had a gay frontman, if you hate gays so much!

Save it for someone who cares. I listen to Judas Priest and Elton John, too.  I don't want to sleep with either of them. Bye, woman.

mike hunt wrote: I hate to admit this,  but skip is a pretty funny dude.

skip wrote:

  Funky Horsie wrote:  

   skip wrote:  

   Funky Horsie wrote:       Skip, this is for you.  I get the feeling you'll like this one! 

Your boyfriend's going to be pissed that you posted his photo on a Queen discussion board. BTW, your ass must hurt all of the time.  Hope he uses a rubber.  You don't want to end up like Freddie.

Haha, I wished that guy was my boyfriend, pal. Because I am a Queen fan, therefore I'm as gay as it gets. Just be careful, sweetie. Always back against the wall. I got a feeling that you don't wanna get to know the MEAT CIGAR. Bye, beautiful. Be careful, we homosexual Queen fans are very agressive.

Now, now, dandyboy, are you trying to flirt with me? I'm not interested.  You need to put on "You Take My Breathe Away" and go please your man.  LOL.

Amazon wrote:

              mike hunt wrote:       I hate to admit this,  but skip is a pretty funny dude.      

I don't know if he's funny, but he is certainly incredibly annoying, and his constant homophobia suggests to me he is one of three things; 1)Skip is an idiot who knows that he doesn't have a leg to stand on in his arguments on Kiss and so has to resort to homophobia so as to distract people from his ignorance. 2)Skip is simply an unpleasant homophobic arsehole who obviously doesn't spend much time in social settings, and shouldn't be allowed to. 3)Skip is playing us all for fools. His homophobia and constant disgusting comments are simply a joke. skip wrote: "Save it for someone who cares. I listen to Judas Priest and Elton John, too.  I don't want to sleep with either of them. Bye, woman." Obviously you care, otherwise why you post? I don't want to sleep with Judas Priest or Elton John either, but unlike you, I don't abuse and attack those who might want to. Oh, and do you realise that woman is my gender, not my name? LOL

skip wrote: Bi-woman, do us all a favor.  Pick one side, stick to it, and stop wasting the other side's time.  LOL

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: Bi-woman, do us all a favor.  Pick one side, stick to it, and stop wasting the other side's time.  LOL

 Nasty child (I bet you are just a teenager.)

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: Bi-woman, do us all a favor.  Pick one side, stick to it, and stop wasting the other side's time.  LOL

 Nasty child (I bet you are just a teenager.)

mike hunt wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: Bi-woman, do us all a favor.  Pick one side, stick to it, and stop wasting the other side's time.  LOL

 Nasty child (I bet you are just a teenager.)

He's no older than 14....I love bi women.[img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]

DvD wrote: I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.

skip wrote:

DvD wrote: I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Sir GH wrote:

skip wrote:

DvD wrote: I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Then by that logic, Kiss are better than The Beatles too.  That said, John Lennon's corpse could still write a better song than anyone in Kiss. You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great. Your arguments are getting pretty weak... not that they were ever strong to begin with.  Keep on trolling..

Amazon wrote:

  Sir GH wrote:  

                              skip wrote:                              

                                                              DvD wrote:                               I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.                              

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Then by that logic, Kiss are better than The Beatles too.  That said, John Lennon's corpse could still write a better song than anyone in Kiss. You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great. Your arguments are getting pretty weak... not that they were ever strong to begin with.  Keep on trolling..

Absolutely true Sir Gh, although I want to note that I personally would rather go to a concert featuring Roger Tyler on lead vocals (my third favourite lead singer in Queen), than go to a Kiss concert. Heck, I would rather go to a concert featuring John Deacon on lead vocals than a Kiss concert. he doesn't have to sing; He can just play his bass, and it would still be better money spent than attending a Kiss concert. Honestly, how anyone could put Kiss in the same category as Queen is beyond me.

Gregsynth wrote: It's apples and oranges. I don't compare bands that are drastically different (Like Queen/Kiss), but I will say that Queen is the better band overall (not because it's a Queen forum, or if I'm biased towards Queen--it's FACT)!

Sir GH wrote:

              skip wrote:              

                              DvD wrote:               I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.              

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Then by that logic, Kiss are better than The Beatles too.  That said, John Lennon's corpse could still write a better song than anyone in Kiss. You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great. Your arguments are getting pretty weak... not that they were ever strong to begin with.  Keep on trolling..

Sir GH wrote: You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great.

Amazon wrote:

      Sir GH wrote:      

                                                              skip wrote:                                                              

                                                                                                                              DvD wrote:                                                               I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.                                                              

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Then by that logic, Kiss are better than The Beatles too.  That said, John Lennon's corpse could still write a better song than anyone in Kiss. You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great. Your arguments are getting pretty weak... not that they were ever strong to begin with.  Keep on trolling..

Absolutely true Sir Gh, although I want to note that I personally would rather go to a concert featuring Roger Tyler on lead vocals (my third favourite lead singer in Queen), than go to a Kiss concert. Heck, I would rather go to a concert featuring John Deacon on lead vocals than a Kiss concert. he doesn't have to sing; He can just play his bass, and it would still be money better spent than attending a Kiss concert. Honestly, how anyone could put Kiss in the same category as Queen is beyond me.

Gregsynth wrote:

  Amazon wrote:  

      Sir GH wrote:      

                                                              skip wrote:                                                              

                                                                                                                              DvD wrote:                                                               I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.                                                              

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Then by that logic, Kiss are better than The Beatles too.  That said, John Lennon's corpse could still write a better song than anyone in Kiss. You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great. Your arguments are getting pretty weak... not that they were ever strong to begin with.  Keep on trolling..

Absolutely true Sir Gh, although I want to note that I personally would rather go to a concert featuring Roger Tyler on lead vocals (my third favourite lead singer in Queen), than go to a Kiss concert. Heck, I would rather go to a concert featuring John Deacon on lead vocals than a Kiss concert. he doesn't have to sing; He can just play his bass, and it would still be better money spent than attending a Kiss concert. Honestly, how anyone could put Kiss in the same category as Queen is beyond me.

It's apples and oranges. I don't compare bands that are drastically different (Like Queen/Kiss), but I will say that Queen is the better band overall (not because it's a Queen forum, or if I'm biased towards Queen--it's FACT)!

Amazon wrote:

      Gregsynth wrote:   It's apples and oranges. I don't compare bands that are drastically different (Like Queen/Kiss), but I will say that Queen is the better band overall (not because it's a Queen forum, or if I'm biased towards Queen--it's FACT)!  

Usually I would feel the same, whether or not someone considers Kiss to be better than Queen doesn't reallly concern me; however Skip has made me so angry with his constant and immaturely unapologetic homophobia, that I thought I would make an exception this time. Nonetheless I certainly agree with your last comment. :D :D :D

skip wrote: That's not fact, it's your opinion.  It's obvious you don't know the difference.

skip wrote:

  Amazon wrote:  

              Sir GH wrote:              

                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              DvD wrote:                                                                                                                               I love how treasure moment is trying to make himself relevant again, not that he was relevant in the first place, but on the subject of Kiss v/ Queen, there's no contests between the two, Queen could kick their uncreative asses any day.                                                                                                                              

But Queen can't because their lead singer is dead.

Then by that logic, Kiss are better than The Beatles too.  That said, John Lennon's corpse could still write a better song than anyone in Kiss. You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great. Your arguments are getting pretty weak... not that they were ever strong to begin with.  Keep on trolling..

Absolutely true Sir Gh, although I want to note that I personally would rather go to a concert featuring Roger Tyler on lead vocals (my third favourite lead singer in Queen), than go to a Kiss concert. Heck, I would rather go to a concert featuring John Deacon on lead vocals than a Kiss concert. he doesn't have to sing; He can just play his bass, and it would still be money better spent than attending a Kiss concert. Honestly, how anyone could put Kiss in the same category as Queen is beyond me.

You'd be more at home at a Melissa Etheridge concert. "KISS:  Behind The Mask" Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

skip wrote: To me KISS are better than The Beatles.

Queen used pyro too, that is, after KISS already was using it.

Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

Thunderbolt wrote:

Sir GH wrote: You probably don't realize this, but all you're doing is furthermore contributing to the general idea that Kiss fans are narrow-minded, pseudo-intellectual people who think pyro and merchandise are what make a band great.

WTF?! You mean there's more to being great than pyro and t-shirts that cost as much as the concert ticket?!

Sir GH wrote:

skip wrote: To me KISS are better than The Beatles.

This statement alone has rendered you unable to discuss music with 99.999% of the civilized world.  Honestly, why do you even bother? No band will ever be bigger or better than The Beatles.  They connected with billions of people around the world.  Their music is perfect and timeless.  If it wasn't, they wouldn't have been the best-selling artists of the last decade (30+ years after their demise), even without the remasters.

Zebonka12 wrote:

  skip wrote: That's not fact, it's your opinion.  It's obvious you don't know the difference.  

  That being the case, why do you post your opinion so often?  Is it an insecurity thing or what?

mike hunt wrote:

  skip wrote:   You'd be more at home at a Melissa Etheridge concert. "KISS:  Behind The Mask" Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

Sorry,  brian doesn't say a bad word about anyone.  This is the same guy who loves katy perry and brittany spears...

Sir GH wrote:

              skip wrote:       To me KISS are better than The Beatles.      

This statement alone has rendered you unable to discuss music with 99.999% of the civilized world.  Honestly, why do you even bother? No band will ever be bigger or better than The Beatles.  They connected with billions of people around the world.  Their music is perfect and timeless.  If it wasn't, they wouldn't have been the best-selling artists of the last decade (30+ years after their demise), even without the remasters.

Queen used pyro too, that is, after KISS already was using it.

But it was never the centrepiece to Queen's show.  It merely augmented what was already happening on stage.  What would Kiss' show be without the make-up, pyro, and gimmicks?  It'd be a bunch of average musicians playing average songs for average people.

Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

It's called being a gentleman and a team player.  Take some notes.

Amazon wrote: Skip wrote: "You'd be more at home at a Melissa Etheridge concert." The fact that you constantly focus on my sexuality (and that of male Queen fans) suggests that you are either genuinely homphobic or you are a troll who doesn't know when to stop. Enough is enough! Skip wrote: "Go listen to your Indigo Girls cds." Actually, I prefer Dixie Chicks.

skip wrote:

  Sir GH wrote:  

                              skip wrote:               To me KISS are better than The Beatles.              

This statement alone has rendered you unable to discuss music with 99.999% of the civilized world.  Honestly, why do you even bother? No band will ever be bigger or better than The Beatles.  They connected with billions of people around the world.  Their music is perfect and timeless.  If it wasn't, they wouldn't have been the best-selling artists of the last decade (30+ years after their demise), even without the remasters.

Queen used pyro too, that is, after KISS already was using it.

But it was never the centrepiece to Queen's show.  It merely augmented what was already happening on stage.  What would Kiss' show be without the make-up, pyro, and gimmicks?  It'd be a bunch of average musicians playing average songs for average people.

Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

It's called being a gentleman and a team player.  Take some notes.

I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.

skip wrote: Who else's opinion am I going to post? If you don't like my opinions or posts then don't read them and don't respond to them.

mike hunt wrote:

skip wrote:

  Sir GH wrote:  

                              skip wrote:               To me KISS are better than The Beatles.              

This statement alone has rendered you unable to discuss music with 99.999% of the civilized world.  Honestly, why do you even bother? No band will ever be bigger or better than The Beatles.  They connected with billions of people around the world.  Their music is perfect and timeless.  If it wasn't, they wouldn't have been the best-selling artists of the last decade (30+ years after their demise), even without the remasters.

Queen used pyro too, that is, after KISS already was using it.

But it was never the centrepiece to Queen's show.  It merely augmented what was already happening on stage.  What would Kiss' show be without the make-up, pyro, and gimmicks?  It'd be a bunch of average musicians playing average songs for average people.

Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

It's called being a gentleman and a team player.  Take some notes.

I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

mike hunt wrote:

  skip wrote:   I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

Zebonka12 wrote:

  skip wrote:   Who else's opinion am I going to post? If you don't like my opinions or posts then don't read them and don't respond to them.

  But that wasn't what I asked you!

Funky Horsie wrote: SKIP, you have EAR AIDS

skip wrote: The only reason I come on this discussion board is to find out about: 1) Queen dvd releases. 2) What Brian is up to musically. 3) What Roger is up to musicially. 4) If there's any word on a rarities/demos box set.

  skip wrote:  

      Sir GH wrote:      

                                                              skip wrote:                               To me KISS are better than The Beatles.                              

This statement alone has rendered you unable to discuss music with 99.999% of the civilized world.  Honestly, why do you even bother? No band will ever be bigger or better than The Beatles.  They connected with billions of people around the world.  Their music is perfect and timeless.  If it wasn't, they wouldn't have been the best-selling artists of the last decade (30+ years after their demise), even without the remasters.

Queen used pyro too, that is, after KISS already was using it.

But it was never the centrepiece to Queen's show.  It merely augmented what was already happening on stage.  What would Kiss' show be without the make-up, pyro, and gimmicks?  It'd be a bunch of average musicians playing average songs for average people.

Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

It's called being a gentleman and a team player.  Take some notes.

I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote: Skip wrote: "You'd be more at home at a Melissa Etheridge concert." The fact that you constantly focus on my sexuality (and that of male Queen fans) suggests that you are either genuinely homphobic or you are a troll who doesn't know when to stop. Enough is enough! Skip wrote: "Go listen to your Indigo Girls cds." Actually, I prefer Dixie Chicks.

You're the one who had the need to declare that you were gay.  Honestly, I could give a rat's ass who you sleep with. Maybe you have issues with your own sexuality.  Otherwise, why the need to bring it up on a Queen discussion board? If my posts bother you so much, then simply don't read them.

skip wrote:

Funky Horsie wrote: SKIP, you have EAR AIDS

Didn't your mom ban you from using her computer?

Funky Horsie wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Funky Horsie wrote:   SKIP, you have EAR AIDS  

Didn't your mom ban you from using her computer?

She sure did but this is my father's.

skip wrote:

  mike hunt wrote:  

      skip wrote:     I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

mike hunt wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      mike hunt wrote:      

              skip wrote:           I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.  

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

You talk about Queen like you do, and they're you're second favorite group?....I hate to see how you talk about a band you hate.......ok, my mistake......Little boy skippy (Only a kiss fan would call themselves skippy)  go and make love to you're Gene poster.  I'm sure they're's sticky spots all over poor gene's face.

skip wrote: And finally, to the KISS haters (you know who you are), it is O.K. to like more than one band.

Sir GH wrote:

                              skip wrote:                               The only reason I come on this discussion board is to find out about: 1) Queen dvd releases. 2) What Brian is up to musically. 3) What Roger is up to musicially. 4) If there's any word on a rarities/demos box set.                              

                              That's interesting, because all you've done here so far is argue with people and shove Kiss down their throats.       For someone whose second-favourite band is Queen, you sure don't have too much positive to say about them.  If you want to refer to Queen as "average" musicians, then Kiss are nothing more than bar musicians.                               Does it bring you some kind of inner joy to spend your evenings trying to start fights with people over the computer?                              

tcc wrote:

      skip wrote:      

              Sir GH wrote:              

                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                               To me KISS are better than The Beatles.                                                              

This statement alone has rendered you unable to discuss music with 99.999% of the civilized world.  Honestly, why do you even bother? No band will ever be bigger or better than The Beatles.  They connected with billions of people around the world.  Their music is perfect and timeless.  If it wasn't, they wouldn't have been the best-selling artists of the last decade (30+ years after their demise), even without the remasters.

Queen used pyro too, that is, after KISS already was using it.

But it was never the centrepiece to Queen's show.  It merely augmented what was already happening on stage.  What would Kiss' show be without the make-up, pyro, and gimmicks?  It'd be a bunch of average musicians playing average songs for average people.

Brian May:  "I like KISS a lot.  Queen were often compared to KISS at the time.  We were sort of counterparts.  They were the American version and we were the English version.  I think we went into it with slightly different ideas.  KISS came more from a presentation view to begin with and moved more toward the musical.  I think we probably started in the musical and worked more toward the presentation.  I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out.  They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

It's called being a gentleman and a team player.  Take some notes.

I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.

I have the feeling that: a)  it is not Queen's music that made you a Queen fan, b)  you are a Queen fan because you saw positive association between Brian May and Roger Taylor and the band members of KISS c)  if Brian and Roger had made negative remarks about KISS etc, you would not be a Queen fan.

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:      

              Amazon wrote:       Skip wrote: "You'd be more at home at a Melissa Etheridge concert." The fact that you constantly focus on my sexuality (and that of male Queen fans) suggests that you are either genuinely homphobic or you are a troll who doesn't know when to stop. Enough is enough! Skip wrote: "Go listen to your Indigo Girls cds." Actually, I prefer Dixie Chicks.      

You're the one who had the need to declare that you were gay.  Honestly, I could give a rat's ass who you sleep with. Maybe you have issues with your own sexuality.  Otherwise, why the need to bring it up on a Queen discussion board? If my posts bother you so much, then simply don't read them.

I brought up my sexuality due to your homophobia. If you were racist, and I was black, I would have brought that up. If you were anti-Semtic, I would have brought up my being Jewish. Stupid and nasty child. BTW, I LOVE being bi. I'm not ashamed of it. My only issue is with homophobes like you. I will say this again; PLEASE stop with this homophobia. Whether I read your posts is irrelevent; if you had any decency, you would cease with this disgusting behaviour.

mike hunt wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      mike hunt wrote:      

              skip wrote:           I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.  

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

You talk about Queen like you do, and they're you're second favorite group?....I hate to see how you talk about a band you hate.......ok, my mistake......Little boy skippy (Only a kiss fan would call themselves skippy)  go and make love to you're Gene poster.  I'm sure they're's sticky spots all over poor gene's face.

Gregsynth wrote:

  mike hunt wrote:  

      skip wrote:      

              mike hunt wrote:              

                              skip wrote:                       I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.      

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

You talk about Queen like you do, and they're you're second favorite group?....I hate to see how you talk about a band you hate.......ok, my mistake......Little boy skippy (Only a kiss fan would call themselves skippy)  go and make love to you're Gene poster.  I'm sure they're's sticky spots all over poor gene's face.

Hey Mike, that was funny!

Zebonka12 wrote:

  skip wrote:   And finally, to the KISS haters (you know who you are), it is O.K. to like more than one band.

      Why didn't you just write something like that in the first place?  It makes so much more sense than your Kiss-oriented revisionism of popular music history.       Isn't it also okay to like a band for your own reasons?  I remember you telling me I liked Kiss for the wrong stuff in another thread .... which is utter baloney.  Surely I am the one who decides what is appealing about an act?  I like them because they connect with a certain part of my sense of humour, and my fondness for a period in 70's music.  I don't like them just because I think I should be worshipping them as rock gods.         Isn't that okay?                

skip wrote: If you like KISS, cool.  If you don't, I don't care.

skip wrote:

Gregsynth wrote:

  mike hunt wrote:  

      skip wrote:      

              mike hunt wrote:              

                              skip wrote:                       I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.      

since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.

Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

You talk about Queen like you do, and they're you're second favorite group?....I hate to see how you talk about a band you hate.......ok, my mistake......Little boy skippy (Only a kiss fan would call themselves skippy)  go and make love to you're Gene poster.  I'm sure they're's sticky spots all over poor gene's face.

Hey Mike, that was funny!

Synthboy, you don't want to be late for your circle jerk with Mike Cunt. 

Gregsynth wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Gregsynth wrote:      

              mike hunt wrote:              

                              skip wrote:                              

                                                              mike hunt wrote:                                                              

                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                                                               I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.                                

  since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.    

  Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

  You talk about Queen like you do, and they're you're second favorite group?....I hate to see how you talk about a band you hate.......ok, my mistake......Little boy skippy (Only a kiss fan would call themselves skippy)  go and make love to you're Gene poster.  I'm sure they're's sticky spots all over poor gene's face.  

Hey Mike, that was funny!        

Synthboy, you don't want to be late for your circle jerk with Mike Cunt.         

skip wrote:

Gregsynth wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Gregsynth wrote:      

              mike hunt wrote:              

                              skip wrote:                              

                                                              mike hunt wrote:                                                              

                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                                                               I don't give a rat's ass about The Beatles.  Neither do a lot of people.  Who cares if they're the biggest band in the world? I don't.  I never gave them any of my money.  And it will always stay that way.  The Beatles never made me want to pick up a guitar, learn how to play, then form a band.   But KISS did.  And so did Queen.  And so did Black Sabbath. Any song with Ringo singing on it is far from perfect. It's obvious you know nothing about KISS.  KISS was hired as the first act on the newly formed Casablanca Records. Neil Bogart heard their demo tape, which was recorded by Eddie Kramer, and loved the music.  They were offered the recording contract.  It was after this that Bogart saw photos of KISS.  He wanted KISS to remove the makeup, KISS said no, and KISStory was made. It began with the music.  It's always been about the music, first. When it comes to average musicians, there are drummers who drum circles around Roger Taylor, guitarists who are far better than Brian May, bass players like Geddy Lee who make John Deacon look like a 1st year student, piano players like Elton John who simply embarrass Freddie Mercury's playing, and singers like Steve Perry who outshined him on cd and live in concert.  Queen put out a lot of crap throughout their career.  They put out their share of below average songs. So, you're now speaking for and interpretting for Brian May?  Shut the fuck up already.                                

  since queen put out such below average music....why are you on this site?...go and chat with other kiss nut huggers.  Dream about making love with ace.    

  Queen's my second favorite group.  With that said, they also released some shitty lps and a bunch of shitty songs. Did I just offend the Queen taint lickers?  LOL Can't stand Ace.  He's not in my dreams.  He must be what you're fantasing about.

  You talk about Queen like you do, and they're you're second favorite group?....I hate to see how you talk about a band you hate.......ok, my mistake......Little boy skippy (Only a kiss fan would call themselves skippy)  go and make love to you're Gene poster.  I'm sure they're's sticky spots all over poor gene's face.  

Hey Mike, that was funny!        

Synthboy, you don't want to be late for your circle jerk with Mike Cunt.        

skip wrote: Cunty bitch.  See, I can be nasty if you also choose to be.  If you respond, I'll respond back.  Your choice.

skip wrote:

Sir GH wrote:

skip wrote: The only reason I come on this discussion board is to find out about: 1) Queen dvd releases. 2) What Brian is up to musically. 3) What Roger is up to musicially. 4) If there's any word on a rarities/demos box set.

That's interesting, because all you've done here so far is argue with people and shove Kiss down their throats. For someone whose second-favourite band is Queen, you sure don't have too much positive to say about them.  If you want to refer to Queen as "average" musicians, then Kiss are nothing more than bar musicians. Does it bring you some kind of inner joy to spend your evenings trying to start fights with people over the computer?

If you don't like the KISS posts, don't read them, asshole.

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:   Cunty bitch.  See, I can be nasty if you also choose to be.  If you respond, I'll respond back.  Your choice.  

So you weren't being nasty before when you were being homophobic? Uh, I think you need to look up the word nasty in the dictionary. Homophobia would certainly come under it. Let's see, you called me a Cunty bitch and you called Mike Hunt 'Mike Cunt'. This shows that not only are you homophobic, but you are misogynistic as well. So, you don't only hate gay people, but you hate women as well. What's wrong Skip? Did you attempt to pick up a woman only for her to turn out to be a lesbian? LOL Oh, and calling me a bitch doesn't offend me. It enlightens me. You see, Skip, the fact that you would resort to calling someone a bitch (ooh, how original) proves that you have truly scraped the bottom of the barrel. During this thread, you have resorted to homophobia and misogynistic name-calling. Instead of discussing the merits of Kiss versus Queen like an adult (which you claim to be), you have acted like a disgusting child. You will undoubtfully respond to this with yet more homophobia and misogynistic name-calling, but perhaps you could try something different, like getting back on topic or providing reasons why you think that Kiss are better than Queen.

Sir GH wrote:

                                                              skip wrote:                                                              

                                                                                                                              Sir GH wrote:                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                                                                                                                                                               The only reason I come on this discussion board is to find out about: 1) Queen dvd releases. 2) What Brian is up to musically. 3) What Roger is up to musicially. 4) If there's any word on a rarities/demos box set.                                                                                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              That's interesting, because all you've done here so far is argue with people and shove Kiss down their throats.                                                                                                                                                                                               For someone whose second-favourite band is Queen, you sure don't have too much positive to say about them.  If you want to refer to Queen as "average" musicians, then Kiss are nothing more than bar musicians.                                                                                                                                                                                               Does it bring you some kind of inner joy to spend your evenings trying to start fights with people over the computer?                                                                                                                                                                                              

If you don't like the KISS posts, don't read them, asshole.

Um, this is a Queen forum, a place where Queen fans can talk about Queen. This is a Kiss forum, a place where Kiss fans can talk about Kiss:  link Comprende?

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:   Cunty bitch.  See, I can be nasty if you also choose to be.  If you respond, I'll respond back.  Your choice.  

So you weren't being nasty before when you were being homophobic? Uh, I think you need to look up the word nasty in the dictionary. Homophobia would certainly come under it. Let's see, you called me a Cunty bitch and you called Mike Hunt 'Mike Cunt'. This shows that not only are you homophobic, but you are misogynistic as well. So, you don't only hate gay people, but you hate women as well. What's wrong Skip? Did you attempt to pick up a woman only for her to turn out to be a lesbian? LOL Oh, and calling me a bitch doesn't offend me. It enlightens me. You see, Skip, the fact that you would resort to calling someone a bitch (ooh, how original) proves that you have truly scraped the bottom of the barrel. During this thread, you have resorted to homophobia and misogynistic name-calling. Instead of discussing the merits of Kiss versus Queen like an adult (which you claim to be), you have acted like a disgusting child. You will undoubtfully respond to this with yet more homophobia and misogynistic name-calling, but perhaps you could try something different, like getting back on topic or providing reasons why you think that Kiss are better than Queen.

I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks. Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.

skip wrote: I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks.

Amazon wrote:

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:   Cunty bitch.  See, I can be nasty if you also choose to be.  If you respond, I'll respond back.  Your choice.  

So you weren't being nasty before when you were being homophobic? Uh, I think you need to look up the word nasty in the dictionary. Homophobia would certainly come under it. Let's see, you called me a Cunty bitch and you called Mike Hunt 'Mike Cunt'. This shows that not only are you homophobic, but you are misogynistic as well. So, you don't only hate gay people, but you hate women as well. What's wrong Skip? Did you attempt to pick up a woman only for her to turn out to be a lesbian? LOL Oh, and calling me a bitch doesn't offend me. It enlightens me. You see, Skip, the fact that you would resort to calling someone a bitch (ooh, how original) proves that you have truly scraped the bottom of the barrel. During this thread, you have resorted to homophobia and misogynistic name-calling. Instead of discussing the merits of Kiss versus Queen like an adult (which you claim to be), you have acted like a disgusting child. You will undoubtfully respond to this with yet more homophobia and misogynistic name-calling, but perhaps you could try something different, like getting back on topic or providing reasons why you think that Kiss are better than Queen.

I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks. Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.

Let me get this straight. You insult my looks, even though you have no idea what I look like, based on the fact that I'm bi, whch in itself is absurd since bisexuals, lesbians and gay people don't all look a certain way (some are actually great looking, imagine that!). Wow, how homophobic and stupid can you get? In my last reply, I challenged you to get back on topic or to explain why you prefer Kiss more than Queen. You , as expected, completely failed to rise to the challenge, preferring intstead to act like a misogynistic homophobe. The reason is pretty obvious. You probably aren't a fan of Kiss, you are certainly no fan of Queen; what you are a fan of is being an abusive troll. Even though you have been asked to stop this behaviour, and even though you have been offered plenty of opportunities to get back onto topic, you presist nonetheless. Well, not only are you a nasty child but if you were truly a fan of Kiss or Queen (which had a gay singer), you would be talking about them instead of running for 'homophobic misogynistic arsehole of the decade'! 'Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.' That says it all about you. Arsehole.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

                              skip wrote:               Cunty bitch.  See, I can be nasty if you also choose to be.  If you respond, I'll respond back.  Your choice.              

So you weren't being nasty before when you were being homophobic? Uh, I think you need to look up the word nasty in the dictionary. Homophobia would certainly come under it. Let's see, you called me a Cunty bitch and you called Mike Hunt 'Mike Cunt'. This shows that not only are you homophobic, but you are misogynistic as well. So, you don't only hate gay people, but you hate women as well. What's wrong Skip? Did you attempt to pick up a woman only for her to turn out to be a lesbian? LOL Oh, and calling me a bitch doesn't offend me. It enlightens me. You see, Skip, the fact that you would resort to calling someone a bitch (ooh, how original) proves that you have truly scraped the bottom of the barrel. During this thread, you have resorted to homophobia and misogynistic name-calling. Instead of discussing the merits of Kiss versus Queen like an adult (which you claim to be), you have acted like a disgusting child. You will undoubtfully respond to this with yet more homophobia and misogynistic name-calling, but perhaps you could try something different, like getting back on topic or providing reasons why you think that Kiss are better than Queen.

I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks. Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.

 Let me get this straight. You insult my looks, even though you have no idea what I look like, based on the fact that I'm bi, whch in itself is absurd since bisexuals, lesbians and gay people don't all look a certain way (some are actually great looking, imagine that!). Wow, how homophobic and stupid can you get? In my last reply, I challenged you to get back on topic or to explain why you prefer Kiss more than Queen. You , as expected, completely failed to rise to the challenge, preferring intstead to act like a misogynistic homophobe. The reason is pretty obvious. You probably aren't a fan of Kiss, you are certainly no fan of Queen; what you are a fan of is being an abusive troll. Even though you have been asked to stop this behaviour, and even though you have been offered plenty of opportunities to get back onto topic, you presist nonetheless. Well, not only are you a nasty child but if you were truly a fan of Kiss or Queen (which had a gay singer), you would be talking about them instead of running for 'homophobic misogynistic arsehole of the decade'! 'Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.' That says it all about you. Arsehole.

Holly2003 wrote:

  skip wrote: I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks.

I reckon the closest you've ever got to a women is when they point you out in a police line up.

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:   I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks. Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.

 Let me get this straight. You insult my looks, even though you have no idea what I look like, based on the fact that I'm bi, whch in itself is absurd since bisexuals, lesbians and gay people don't all look a certain way (some are actually great looking, imagine that!). Wow, how homophobic and stupid can you get? In my last reply, I challenged you to get back on topic or to explain why you prefer Kiss more than Queen. You , as expected, completely failed to rise to the challenge, preferring intstead to act like a misogynistic homophobe. The reason is pretty obvious. You probably aren't a fan of Kiss, you are certainly no fan of Queen; what you are a fan of is being an abusive troll. Even though you have been asked to stop this behaviour, and even though you have been offered plenty of opportunities to get back onto topic, you presist nonetheless. Well, not only are you a nasty child but if you were truly a fan of Kiss or Queen (which had a gay singer), you would be talking about them instead of running for 'homophobic misogynistic arsehole of the decade'! 'Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.' That says it all about you. Arsehole.

"As The Bi Spins" LOL I don't give a rat's ass about you, your sexuality, or your opinions.  You're just a series of 0s and 1s on a computer screen.

Gregsynth wrote: I should make an Amazon VS Skip match on my Youtube channel! LMFAO

skip wrote:

  Holly2003 wrote:  

      skip wrote:   I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks.  

I reckon the closest you've ever got to a women is when they point you out in a police line up.

Checking out those photos in your dad's porno mags is the closest you'll ever get to seeing a naked woman. LOL.

Amazon wrote:

Gregsynth wrote: I should make an Amazon VS Skip match on my Youtube channel! LMFAO

Perhaps, however from my end, I can assure you, it's not that funny. I would love to be able to get back on topic or to discuss the merits of Kiss versus Queen, but it seems it won't be happening any time soon.

Amazon wrote:

  Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

              skip wrote:             I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks. Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.

 Let me get this straight. You insult my looks, even though you have no idea what I look like, based on the fact that I'm bi, whch in itself is absurd since bisexuals, lesbians and gay people don't all look a certain way (some are actually great looking, imagine that!). Wow, how homophobic and stupid can you get? In my last reply, I challenged you to get back on topic or to explain why you prefer Kiss more than Queen. You , as expected, completely failed to rise to the challenge, preferring intstead to act like a misogynistic homophobe. The reason is pretty obvious. You probably aren't a fan of Kiss, you are certainly no fan of Queen; what you are a fan of is being an abusive troll. Even though you have been asked to stop this behaviour, and even though you have been offered plenty of opportunities to get back onto topic, you presist nonetheless. Well, not only are you a nasty child but if you were truly a fan of Kiss or Queen (which had a gay singer), you would be talking about them instead of running for 'homophobic misogynistic arsehole of the decade'! 'Wind the bi up.  Watch her spin. Fun stuff.' That says it all about you. Arsehole.

"As The Bi Spins" LOL I don't give a rat's ass about you, your sexuality, or your opinions.  You're just a series of 0s and 1s on a computer screen.

LOL Do you really think that people care about what YOU think? Especially after your constant abuse? Keep it up Skip. Every time you write anothe post, you remind us what a disgusting, homophobic and misogynistic arsehole you truly are. You're absolutely pathetic.

Holly2003 wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Holly2003 wrote:      

              skip wrote:       I like my women to look like women, not like lumberjacks.      

I reckon the closest you've ever got to a women is when they point you out in a police line up.

Checking out those photos in your dad's porno mags is the closest you'll ever get to seeing a naked woman. LOL.

A reply that is dull, unimaginative, and repetitive. Just like Kiss's music.

Holly2003 wrote: Garth Ennis hates Kiss.

Gregsynth wrote:

  Amazon wrote:  

              Gregsynth wrote:       I should make an Amazon VS Skip match on my Youtube channel! LMFAO      

Perhaps, however from my end, I can assure you, it's not that funny. I would love to be able to get back on topic or to discuss the merits of Kiss versus Queen, but it seems it won't be happening any time soon.      

Ah OK. I'd better save the channel for the funny/good matches like the Freddie Mercury vs Freddie Mercury matches. lolAnyway, back on topic. Queen > Kiss.

Zebonka12 wrote: ... prove it.

skip wrote:

Zebonka12 wrote: ... prove it.

I like KISS more than Queen. FACT.

Sheer Brass Neck wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Zebonka12 wrote:   ... prove it.  

I like KISS more than Queen.   FACT.      

Skip, we already know you have a lower IQ than anyone here, no reason to prove why.

Gregsynth wrote: Queen >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kiss

skip wrote: I like KISS more than Queen. FACT.

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  Sheer Brass Neck wrote: Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

"Rock you all nite" LOL It wouldn't hurt you to get out of the gay discos a few times. LOL Gene Simmons had sex with over 4000 women.  You seem jealous. LOL

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:      

              Amazon wrote:              

                              Sheer Brass Neck wrote:               Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."              

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

"Rock you all nite" LOL It wouldn't hurt you to get out of the gay discos a few times. LOL Gene Simmons had sex with over 4000 women.  You seem jealous. LOL

  Yes, "Rock you all nite"; an ordinary song from a crap group. I've never been to a gay disco. However, you seem to be the expert on such things. As for Simmons, why would I be jealous of him? Because he's slept with 4000 women? You're such a child. This may shock you, but when you grow up you will realise that most people don't evaluate their love life on how many women (or men) they've slept with.

mike hunt wrote:

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:      

              Amazon wrote:              

                              Sheer Brass Neck wrote:               Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."              

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

"Rock you all nite" LOL It wouldn't hurt you to get out of the gay discos a few times. LOL Gene Simmons had sex with over 4000 women.  You seem jealous. LOL

  Yes, "Rock you all nite"; an ordinary song from a crap group. I've never been to a gay disco. However, you seem to be the expert on such things. As for Simmons, why would I be jealous of him? Because he's slept with 4000 women? You're such a child. This may shock you, but when you grow up you will realise that most people don't evaluate their love life on how many women (or men) they've slept with.

I think good old skippy has a crush on you.....[img=/images/smiley/msn/omg_smile.gif][/img]

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:

I think you have a crush on me.  You keep coming back for more. LOL

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:      

              Amazon wrote:              

                              Sheer Brass Neck wrote:               Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."              

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

"Rock you all nite" LOL It wouldn't hurt you to get out of the gay discos a few times. LOL Gene Simmons had sex with over 4000 women.  You seem jealous. LOL

  Yes, "Rock you all nite"; an ordinary song from a crap group. I've never been to a gay disco. However, you seem to be the expert on such things. As for Simmons, why would I be jealous of him? Because he's slept with 4000 women? You're such a child. This may shock you, but when you grow up you will realise that most people don't evaluate their love life on how many women (or men) they've slept with.

mike hunt wrote:

  Amazon wrote:  

              skip wrote:              

                              Amazon wrote:                              

                                                              Sheer Brass Neck wrote:                               Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."                              

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

"Rock you all nite" LOL It wouldn't hurt you to get out of the gay discos a few times. LOL Gene Simmons had sex with over 4000 women.  You seem jealous. LOL

  Yes, "Rock you all nite"; an ordinary song from a crap group. I've never been to a gay disco. However, you seem to be the expert on such things. As for Simmons, why would I be jealous of him? Because he's slept with 4000 women? You're such a child. This may shock you, but when you grow up you will realise that most people don't evaluate their love life on how many women (or men) they've slept with.

I think good old skippy has a crush on you.....[img=/images/smiley/msn/omg_smile.gif][/img]

Amazon wrote:

  mike hunt wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

                              skip wrote:                              

                                                              Amazon wrote:                                                              

                                                                                                                              Sheer Brass Neck wrote:                                                               Brian May: "I like KISS a lot. I have a great regard for KISS 'cause it's all-out. They just had their vision, they had their dream, and they damn well went for it."                                                              

Love little Skippy's use of a Brian quote.  Not a word about liking their music, but their vision.  Which is what KISS were to a lot of people.  Ultimately suceesful, and full marks for that, musically, virtually forgettable save a few tunes.  Over 35 years you'd hope you'd get it right once in a while, and KISS did every decade or so." I completely agree. Apart from Rock you all nite (or whatever it's called), I couldn't name a single song of them. Well, there's also Love Gun (?), but that's all. When I think of Kiss, I think of the makeup, and how annoying Gene Simmons is. That to me does not make a good rock band.

"Rock you all nite" LOL It wouldn't hurt you to get out of the gay discos a few times. LOL Gene Simmons had sex with over 4000 women.  You seem jealous. LOL

  Yes, "Rock you all nite"; an ordinary song from a crap group. I've never been to a gay disco. However, you seem to be the expert on such things. As for Simmons, why would I be jealous of him? Because he's slept with 4000 women? You're such a child. This may shock you, but when you grow up you will realise that most people don't evaluate their love life on how many women (or men) they've slept with.

I think good old skippy has a crush on you.....[img=/images/smiley/msn/omg_smile.gif][/img]

Yeh, you may be right about that! He does remind me of a little boy who hits the girl he has a crush on.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

              skip wrote:          

I think you have a crush on me.  You keep coming back for more. LOL

 Don't flatter yourself. I keep on 'coming back for more' , partly because I have this misguided hope that you would actually contribute something of value to this board, but also your nastiness and stupidity is really amusing. In fact, I think it amuses alot of the other members of the site.

skip wrote: a lot (two words). You want me.  You know it. LOL

skip wrote: At laugh at you twice. LOL and LOL The song's "Rock And Roll All Nite", dumbass. LOL The Gene Simmons part went right over that dumbass head of yours. LOL

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: a lot (two words). You want me.  You know it. LOL

 Some people spell it using one word. No, I don't want you. Not in the slightest. Why would I want a nasty and stupid little child?

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: At laugh at you twice. LOL and LOL The song's "Rock And Roll All Nite", dumbass. LOL The Gene Simmons part went right over that dumbass head of yours. LOL

LOL yourself. Why would I care whether it's "Rock And Roll All Nite"? They're a shit group. If the Gene Simmons part went over my head, then explain to me? What did you mean when you said that I must be jealous of him since he's slept with 4000 women? Well, I'm not jealous in the slighest. Oh, and considering how criminally stupid you are, you probably shouldn't be calling anyone a dumbass.

Zebonka12 wrote: I've slept with 5000 women*, eat that Gene.

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: a lot (two words). You want me.  You know it. LOL

 Some people spell it using one word. No, I don't want you. Not in the slightest. Why would I want a nasty and stupid little child?

a lot Two words.  People who spell it as one word are incorrect. I can feel your sexual tension. LOL

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

              skip wrote:       a lot (two words). You want me.  You know it. LOL      

 Some people spell it using one word. No, I don't want you. Not in the slightest. Why would I want a nasty and stupid little child?

a lot Two words.  People who spell it as one word are incorrect. I can feel your sexual tension. LOL

Actually, many people spell it using one word, and they are not incorrect. I bet you think that there is only one way to spell color/colour. LOL What a stupid idiot. Oh, and in what way is my sexual tension coming across to you? Because if you were the last being on the planet, and my sleeping with you was necessary to ensure the survival of the human race, I would shoot myself in the head rather than sleep with you. Keep this up Skip; you're becoming more disgusting and more stupid by the second.

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: At laugh at you twice. LOL and LOL The song's "Rock And Roll All Nite", dumbass. LOL The Gene Simmons part went right over that dumbass head of yours. LOL

LOL yourself. Why would I care whether it's "Rock And Roll All Nite"? They're a shit group. If the Gene Simmons part went over my head, then explain to me? What did you mean when you said that I must be jealous of him since he's slept with 4000 women? Well, I'm not jealous in the slighest. Oh, and considering how criminally stupid you are, you probably shouldn't be calling anyone a dumbass.

Slept with 4000 women.  Women.  You being bi.  Are you blonde, too? LOL

mike hunt wrote: you cute little love birds!

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:      

              skip wrote:       a lot (two words). You want me.  You know it. LOL      

 Some people spell it using one word. No, I don't want you. Not in the slightest. Why would I want a nasty and stupid little child?

a lot Two words.  People who spell it as one word are incorrect. I can feel your sexual tension. LOL

Actually, many people spell it using one word, and they are not incorrect. I bet you think that there is only one way to spell color/colour. LOL What a stupid idiot. Oh, and in what way is my sexual tension coming across to you? Because if you were the last being on the planet, and my sleeping with you was necessary to ensure the survival of the human race, I would shoot myself in the head rather than sleep with you. Keep this up Skip; you're becoming more disgusting and more stupid by the second.

Amazon wrote:

              skip wrote:              

                              Amazon wrote:                              

                                                              skip wrote:                               At laugh at you twice. LOL and LOL The song's "Rock And Roll All Nite", dumbass. LOL The Gene Simmons part went right over that dumbass head of yours. LOL                              

LOL yourself. Why would I care whether it's "Rock And Roll All Nite"? They're a shit group. If the Gene Simmons part went over my head, then explain to me? What did you mean when you said that I must be jealous of him since he's slept with 4000 women? Well, I'm not jealous in the slighest. Oh, and considering how criminally stupid you are, you probably shouldn't be calling anyone a dumbass.

Slept with 4000 women.  Women.  You being bi.  Are you blonde, too? LOL

So, if I'm bi, I must be jealous of him that he's slept with 4000 women? What a dumb idiot. Oh, and I'm not blonde, although for someone as stupid as you are, you should refrain from insulting the intelligence of other people. But then, I'm not surprised that you would make a blonde comment. Gays, women, blondes; are there any group you don't hate? Filthy little child.

Amazon wrote:

  mike hunt wrote: you cute little love birds!

Please, make whatever jokes you want, but not about that. The idea of being grouped together with Skip, in any positive context, repulses me.

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote: So, if I'm bi, I must be jealous of him that he's slept with 4000 women? What a dumb idiot. Oh, and I'm not blonde, although for someone as stupid as you are, you should refrain from insulting the intelligence of other people. But then, I'm not surprised that you would make a blonde comment. Gays, women, blondes; are there any group you don't hate? Filthy little child.

Do your ears make a whistling sound when air passes through them? LOL The only group of people I hate are stupid people.  You can add yourself to that group.

skip wrote:

A lot.  Two words. You're wrong, dumbass.  End of story. link A Lot or Allot ? A lot (two words) is an informal phrase meaning "many." It can take an adjective, for example, "a sizeable lot." Example: Karl needed a lot of time for the job. Allot means "to distribute between or among." It has the same root as lottery. Example: He allotted three breaks a day to everyone in the department. Alot does not exist as a word. Sweet dreams. LOL

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      Amazon wrote:     So, if I'm bi, I must be jealous of him that he's slept with 4000 women? What a dumb idiot. Oh, and I'm not blonde, although for someone as stupid as you are, you should refrain from insulting the intelligence of other people. But then, I'm not surprised that you would make a blonde comment. Gays, women, blondes; are there any group you don't hate? Filthy little child.

Do your ears make a whistling sound when air passes through them? LOL The only group of people I hate are stupid people.  You can add yourself to that group.

LOL. Do you listen to yourself? YOU are calling me stupid? Skip, you are so stupid, that if stupidity were a crime, you would be given a billion life sentences. Considering how incredibly stupid you are, you probably shouldn't call anyone stupid. Although it does reveal something interest; your self-loathing. Admitt it Skip, you hate yourself. Not just because you're stupid, but because you're a nasty child whom nobody likes and has contributed nothing of any benefit to the world. Thanks for revealing that you hate yourself; it explains everything.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

A lot.  Two words. You're wrong, dumbass.  End of story. link A Lot or Allot ? A lot (two words) is an informal phrase meaning "many." It can take an adjective, for example, "a sizeable lot." Example: Karl needed a lot of time for the job. Allot means "to distribute between or among." It has the same root as lottery. Example: He allotted three breaks a day to everyone in the department. Alot does not exist as a word. Sweet dreams. LOL

You're giving me grammar lessons? What a joke. Considering that there are quite a number of authors who use alot, I guess you're going to tell all of these authors that they are wrong. LOL You're a stupid idiot Skip. Sweet deams yourself.  Pathetic.

mike hunt wrote: you guys make a cute couple.....just let me know when the wedding is...hope I'm invited, along with the[img=/images/smiley/msn/heart.gif][/img]  other Queenzoners.

skip wrote: You are a moron.  It seems that your sexuality isn't the only thing in your life that you have difficulties with.  Good night, sweet dumbass. LOL

skip wrote:

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

A lot.  Two words. You're wrong, dumbass.  End of story. link A Lot or Allot ? A lot (two words) is an informal phrase meaning "many." It can take an adjective, for example, "a sizeable lot." Example: Karl needed a lot of time for the job. Allot means "to distribute between or among." It has the same root as lottery. Example: He allotted three breaks a day to everyone in the department. Alot does not exist as a word. Sweet dreams. LOL

You're giving me grammar lessons? What a joke. Considering that there are quite a number of authors who use alot, I guess you're going to tell all of these authors that they are wrong. LOL You're a stupid idiot Skip. Sweet deams yourself.  Pathetic.

You can go on living your life in the uneducated manner you presently do.  Those "authors" and "editors" that write the trash you read should be fired for not knowing that a lot is two words not one. You're an uneducated, cunty, bi-bitch. Nighty, nighty and don't let the crabs bite. LOL

mike hunt wrote: you guys make a cute couple.....just let me know when the wedding is...hope I'm invited, along with the[img=/images/smiley/msn/heart.gif][/img]  other Queenzoners.

skip wrote:

mike hunt wrote: you guys make a cute couple.....just let me know when the wedding is...hope I'm invited, along with the[img=/images/smiley/msn/heart.gif][/img]  other Queenzoners.

She has a big mouth, but then again that big mouth does come in handy. LOL

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: You are a moron.  It seems that your sexuality isn't the only thing in your life that you have difficulties with.  Good night, sweet dumbass. LOL

Here you go again, calling other people stupid, when you are so stupid that you probaly don't even know what it means!!! God, you're  a disgusting and stupid child. When the hell are you going to grow up? Oh, and I have no problem with my sexuality. I'm not the homophobe here! You really are repulsive. To think that this all began because you don't know the first thing about your favourite rock group!

Amazon wrote:

              skip wrote:              

                              Amazon wrote:                              

                                                              skip wrote:                                                              

A lot.  Two words. You're wrong, dumbass.  End of story. link A Lot or Allot ? A lot (two words) is an informal phrase meaning "many." It can take an adjective, for example, "a sizeable lot." Example: Karl needed a lot of time for the job. Allot means "to distribute between or among." It has the same root as lottery. Example: He allotted three breaks a day to everyone in the department. Alot does not exist as a word. Sweet dreams. LOL

You're giving me grammar lessons? What a joke. Considering that there are quite a number of authors who use alot, I guess you're going to tell all of these authors that they are wrong. LOL You're a stupid idiot Skip. Sweet deams yourself.  Pathetic.

You can go on living your life in the uneducated manner you presently do.  Those "authors" and "editors" that write the trash you read should be fired for not knowing that a lot is two words not one. You're an uneducated, cunty, bi-bitch. Nighty, nighty and don't let the crabs bite. LOL

Those authors include such people as Thomas Keneally. Ever heard of him? Of course not, because you can't even read! I will state for the LAST time; some people (correctly) spell it using one word, and little boy, you are no in no position to call anyone uneducated. I bet you haven't been to school. Pathetic. I'm an 'uneducated, cunty, bi-bitch'? No, compared to you, Skip, NOONE is uneducated. You are the dumbest person alive. But the fact that you, yet again, called me a a cunty, bi-bitch proves what a homophobe and misogynist you are. How the fuck can you be a fan of Queen, if you hate gays so much? Or are you just a stupid and ugly troll who delights in abusing women and gays over the internet? God, you're stupid and ugly. Oh, and those crabs are much more pleasant than you could ever be, and they've gotten closer to a woman than you will ever get!

Amazon wrote:

  mike hunt wrote: you guys make a cute couple.....just let me know when the wedding is...hope I'm invited, along with the[img=/images/smiley/msn/heart.gif][/img]  other Queenzoners.

Mike, I've asked before, PLEASE don't make such jokes about me and Skip. It truly disgusts me.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote:  

      mike hunt wrote:   you guys make a cute couple.....just let me know when the wedding is...hope I'm invited, along with the[img=/images/smiley/msn/heart.gif][/img]  other Queenzoners.  

She has a big mouth, but then again that big mouth does come in handy. LOL

It does, but you have never, and will never experience what it can do. The closest you'll ever get is an inflatable doll. This will be my last post on this thread. I'm sure you will reply to each of my posts with even more ugly replys, but I will leave you with this. You are an incredibly stupid and horrifically ugly individual. I don't know whether you are a child, or an adult. if you are a child, I can only hope that when you grow up, you will shed your hatred (I don't think you can shed your stupidity). If you are an adult, then I think you are an absolute abomination. You attack people based on their gender, their sexuality, which only came up because of your homophobia, and you don't get why people might be annoyed? No, you thrive on it. You're a troll of the worst kind; someone so bitter, so self-loathing, so stupid, that I question whether you have any humanity in you. You're a waste of time, and I'm not going to waste any more posts or time on you. You are truly repulsive, and to quote your favourite expression, LOL!

skip wrote: I'm not calling other people stupid, I'm calling YOU stupid.  You're a moron.  Sorry that offends you.  LOL

skip wrote: What's pathetic is your grammar. Wrong again, but then again you're an uneducated moron. So who gave you the crabs your stanky girl-whore or your drugged out boyfriend? LOL BTW, I don't hate gays.  What I do like to do is wind you up and watch you lose your mind. LOL Pleasant scratching. LOL

skip wrote: Honey, don't go away mad. LOL

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: I'm not calling other people stupid, I'm calling YOU stupid.  You're a moron.  Sorry that offends you.  LOL

Why would I be offended by being called stupid by you? You are one of the dumbest and most stupid people alive. You are so stupid, it should be your middle name. In fact, you don't understand what I'm saying. Maybe this will help. YOU ARE A STUPID LITTLE CHILD. MY 1-YEAR OLD NIECE IS SMARTER THAN YOU.

Amazon wrote:

  skip wrote: What's pathetic is your grammar. Wrong again, but then again you're an uneducated moron. So who gave you the crabs your stanky girl-whore or your drugged out boyfriend? LOL BTW, I don't hate gays.  What I do like to do is wind you up and watch you lose your mind. LOL Pleasant scratching. LOL

Actually I'm right and my grammar is fine. It is YOU who needs a lesson in grammar. For someone as incredibly stupid as you (were you dropped on your head as a child?) you are not in a position to call anyone an ' uneducated moron.' You are so dumb that to call you that would be a compliment. Nobody gave me any crabs, you repulsive little piece of shit. But at least, I'm in a relationship, unlike you who will need to go to prison to get any sexual contact. Maybe that's where you spend most of your time. "BTW, I don't hate gays." Really? Then what do you call 'Here comes the bi, I mean, bride ...'  and 'What's disgusting is a bisexual disease spreader'? At least have the balls to admitt that you're homophobic. Or perhaps your problem is that you don't have any balls. "What I do like to do is wind you up and watch you lose your mind." Well, you aren't succeeding. Repulsive and nasty children like you aren't worth losing my mind over. Oh, and to call you an STD petri dish would be an insult to STD petri dishes.

Amazon wrote:

      skip wrote:   Honey, don't go away mad. LOL  

Don't call me honey, you piece of shit. Okay, you made your point; you're a nasty and stupid troll. NOW END THIS CONVERSATION! Prove to me that you have some decency and intelligence, and stop with your repetitive, stupid, nasty, homophobic and misogynistic abuse.

tcc wrote: Amazon, don't waste your breath over this type of people.  He will not stop as long as you keep answering.  The best way to deal with this type of people is to ignore them.  Don't give them attention. "Take care of those you call your own and keep good company."

tcc wrote: Amazon, don't waste your breath over this type of people.  He will not stop as long as you keep answering.  The best way to deal with this type of people is to ignore them.  Don't give them attention. "Take care of those you call your own and keep good company."

ILoveQueen20 wrote: Skip... Don't want to get too involved with this but I will just  say one thing...you claim Queens your '2nd favourite band' but from what you've been saying on here YOUR NOT MUCH OF A FAN are you. Your actually insult me by claiming your a fan of Queen. Pfffffttt. p.s this is queenzone not kisszone, Go to a KISS forum=simple. So Bye :)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              skip wrote:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ILoveQueen20 wrote:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Skip... Don't want to get too involved with this but I will just  say one thing...you claim Queens your '2nd favourite band' but from what you've been saying on here YOUR NOT MUCH OF A FAN are you. Your actually insult me by claiming your a fan of Queen. Pfffffttt. p.s this is queenzone not kisszone, Go to a KISS forum=simple. So Bye :)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

1) You need to work on your English. 2) I'll surf where I please. 3) Don't tell me how much I like or should like Queen. 4) KISS Sonic Boom World Tour 2010

mike hunt wrote: skip is such a kiss fan boy

ILoveQueen20 wrote:

  skip wrote:     1) You need to work on your English. 2) I'll surf where I please. 3) Don't tell me how much I like or should like Queen. 4) KISS Sonic Boom World Tour 2010

Actually your mistaken I DID'NT tell you how much you like or should like Queen, I simply said your not much of a fan-theres a difference.  Your just aN attention seeker stuck on the wrong website.Im done here.Bye  p.s You really should change your user name to GRAMMAR NAZI-it would suit you. :)

ILoveQueen20 wrote:  ^ Well good for you! [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] But sadly I dont care :-D

                                                                                                                              ILoveQueen20 wrote:                                                                ^ Well good for you! [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] But sadly I dont care :-D                                                              

Russian Headlong wrote: Who will be lead singer. I wouldnt besurprised to see PR do some more shows with them after his Bad Company Reunion. Persoanlly I have singers, either I would be happy to step in. Justin Hawkins or Jeff Scott Soto. Both are excellent frontmen, vocally and stage wise who are both influenced by Fred but wouldnt try to ape him. What are other fans views on possible front men?