greataddict 23.11.2009 01:24 |
Hi everyone! Just found out that the track is already available for download: link Just listenned to it Very nice Roger's work, I think it will grow on me... I just disliked the sound chosen for the viola... Wanted to let you guys know... Have a nice day cheers! |
Nightjar_ 23.11.2009 04:30 |
Thanks for the early link. Yup it's a grower..... |
leto 23.11.2009 04:54 |
Well, I just listened... I think it's a great song, good ideas inside. And it is the first time we can heard a very special instrument (around 3 minutes) : a Stylophone !!! http://www.stylophone.com/ |
inu-liger 23.11.2009 05:47 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8ZtaDOniZ0 |
YourValentine 23.11.2009 06:11 |
I like the song. It's much better than I expected and the sentiment appeals to me very much. I wish I would understand all the lyrics. I think the YouTube video will hurt the sales. There is vitually no hope that they release it on a CD... |
Rien 23.11.2009 06:33 |
a great track. Very Roger. I like it. as one can download youtube vids and convert them into mp3, shouldn't the link to the video be removed? |
roy_fokker 23.11.2009 06:44 |
Roger Taylor here shows he's a man that thinks. Not only about words, but also about music. The song is 'in' Roger's style, but also contains new tunes, harmonies and melodies. I liked it very much and I deem it will grow on me as I will listen to it these next days. Surley Roger has enough of music as mere escapism or just 'divertissement', and this is great. |
Tim June 23.11.2009 07:07 |
I think it is a musically very good song with a catchy melancholic feel. It feels for me like a November Song. You can criticise protestsong "cliches", but this one has a original "theme", that's sadly not so often bespoken by musicians, beside from subculture music (for e.g. Punk). |
brians wig 23.11.2009 07:13 |
Rien wrote: a great track. Very Roger. I like it. as one can download youtube vids and convert them into mp3, shouldn't the link to the video be removed? Well. I've not had much luck downloading the video so far, and normally I don't have any problems... That said, yes, you can capture the audio without download the video anyway, but the actual download of the song itself is better quality than the youtube clip. As for removing the link to the video - don't be silly. It's an official Queenonline upload to youtube. They WANT people to see and hear it, so having the link here is only promoting what Queen/Roger wants. |
Rien 23.11.2009 07:20 |
brians wig wrote:Rien wrote: a great track. Very Roger. I like it. as one can download youtube vids and convert them into mp3, shouldn't the link to the video be removed?Well. I've not had much luck downloading the video so far, and normally I don't have any problems... That said, yes, you can capture the audio without download the video anyway, but the actual download of the song itself is better quality than the youtube clip. As for removing the link to the video - don't be silly. It's an official Queenonline upload to youtube. They WANT people to see and hear it, so having the link here is only promoting what Queen/Roger wants. I just noticed the official download is indeed of better quality. Let's fun it then. :-) |
Vali 23.11.2009 07:35 |
Good song; it took directions I dind't expect when listening to the preview. Roger has my unconditional vote since The Cross II & III ... it's been a while :) Galileo at the QOL forum commented there are a few more new songs Roger's been busy with in the studio ... Maybe there's still hope for an EP or something like that ... |
FriedChicken 23.11.2009 07:40 |
YourValentine wrote: I like the song. It's much better than I expected and the sentiment appeals to me very much. I wish I would understand all the lyrics. I think the YouTube video will hurt the sales. There is vitually no hope that they release it on a CD... Releasing a CD would be pointless, since it costs more money then you will ever get back. And hardly anyone releases CD singles these days. I know it's sad, but it's fighting against something inevitably . |
FriedChicken 23.11.2009 07:41 |
leto wrote: Well, I just listened... I think it's a great song, good ideas inside. And it is the first time we can heard a very special instrument (around 3 minutes) : a Stylophone !!! http://www.stylophone.com/ Isn't it just a Kaoss Pad? |
Dan C. 23.11.2009 07:47 |
Love it. This is the kind of thing I was hoping to hear from Roger on Cock the Rosmos. Here's hoping for an album! |
leto 23.11.2009 07:48 |
FriedChicken wrote:leto wrote: Well, I just listened... I think it's a great song, good ideas inside. And it is the first time we can heard a very special instrument (around 3 minutes) : a Stylophone !!! http://www.stylophone.com/Isn't it just a Kaoss Pad? It's an authentic Stylophone as we can see in the video. :) |
CD89 23.11.2009 07:59 |
On the whole, I really like the track. For me, Roger's compositions get better and better. He really seems to be coming into his own. As someone else mentioned, there is a sense of melancholy on the track; a feeling that has been evident on a few pieces of his work since the early 90s - TATDOOL, Happiness, SINT, Small etc. It's nice to see someone who isn't just writing about love all the time, but is actually addressing real issues. Also, perhaps Brian should listen to 'The Unblinking Eye' and take note. Although it is ultimately a protest song (and I admit, I do cringe when I hear Roger mention Afghanistan in there), it does not come across as excessive or preachy, and does not convey the sort of 'I know best' attitude that is present on 'We Believe'. Instead, I feel like it's quite subtle, and is merely an observation of the times we are currently going through. My only criticism of the track is that it feels disjointed at times. The segment after the first chorus (where the distorted guitars kick in) really caught me off-guard, and the strings section after the stylophone solo also sounded a bit odd when it began. For me, I think I would have preferred it if these parts were omitted. But it's just a personal opinion. I think it's great to see Roger going out on his own again - I really love hearing him singing lead on a track after all this time! And although I am a huge Queen fan, and even though I supported the QPR collaboration, I can't help but feel that Brian and Roger were beginning to prostitute the Queen name recently. It makes much more sense to keep Queen's legacy intact, and for Roger and Brian to go about making music in the own rights now. Because after hearing 'The Unblinking Eye', I think Roger is perfectly capable of doing so. |
Mr Mercury 23.11.2009 08:38 |
I thoroughly enjoyed that. You can see why Roger apparently asked Brian not to play on this as Brian would have taken this song in a different direction and quite possibly have ruined it. As dear old Fred once said - "Sock it to them Rog!" |
theCro 23.11.2009 09:39 |
great song, great vocals, great arrangement... great to hear roger singing lead vocals. GREAT JOB!!! ps i do not agree that Brian would ruin the song |
masterstroke_84 23.11.2009 09:57 |
I love Brian, but I dont understand why he is included in this conversation... this is a SOLO song... and a great one. |
Reid_Special_98 23.11.2009 10:12 |
Okay so I just listened on Youtube. Initial reaction: Jesus. I think it's the most interesting offering we've had of Queen-related solo material. Proves that Roger isn't a one-trick pony. I LOVE the Gretch, Marshall Cab, Hiwatt head....AND...AND...AND...Vox DEACY !! (check 1:19). Not sold on the lyrics...they sound too Bono 'I need to be political' for me...but the music and different instruments are quite interesting. Lots of different flavours here. But yeah...if Roger can write more of this stuff...having fun in the studio like this then I'm sold. Overal...aside from the lyrics...I think it's an excellent track. Great sounding track. To my ears at least. Sold ! |
GratefulFan 23.11.2009 10:32 |
Extremely pleasantly surprised - the preview did not do it justice. I've always loved Rog's voice, and almost always loved his musical instincts. I'm happy for him, and proud to now own it outright. Three of them actually, on accident. Trying to refund the last two. If that turns out to be too much of a pain in the ass, I'll give the other two away to a couple of poor Queenzone fans. |
mickyparise 23.11.2009 10:33 |
Very nice song. This is called music unlike the garage out nowadays. |
Hutchence 23.11.2009 11:21 |
I am big R.T. fan but, unfortunately, I have to say that this song is very boring. Hope that the other tracks he did are more exciting. Looking forward to next year's tour...!!! |
GratefulFan 23.11.2009 11:23 |
Hutchence wrote: I am a great R.T. fan but, unfortunately, I have to say that this song is very boring. Hope that the other tracks he did are more exciting. Looking forward to next year's tour...!!! I had that same reaction after the preview, but the full song stepped it up for me. Anyway, sorry you didn't like it. :( Hopefully there will be more to come. |
Hitman 23.11.2009 11:49 |
I love this song! Funny how as Muse sometimes recalls Queen in their style, now Roger sounds a bit like Muse, with similar atmospheres... Moreover, i'd like to underline how he makes sure in the video he's the only person appearing. THis song is full of meanings, which Roger doesn't keep between the lines! One more thing: the "sentences" before the full listen were quite hasty!!! Congratulations Roger!!!! |
Pim Derks 23.11.2009 12:01 |
Nice track. Not the kind of track I hoped, but still quite cool. Would be nice to see this on an album, along with some other new tracks. I'd love to hear a version of Small with Roger on vocals! |
drjones 23.11.2009 12:49 |
its a superb track, very happiness? the video is good too, very ironic that it looks rough (everything is broken....) roll on an album & tour . ROCK ON ROGER ! |
Erik Viking 23.11.2009 12:54 |
In the video in the very first verse you cannot see Roger's face but you can clearly see "Queen" logo. Nice beggining of solo song. The Song is better then I've expected. |
Holly2003 23.11.2009 13:14 |
A bit dull, to be honest. |
pma 23.11.2009 13:31 |
After the six minutes, I felt empty. I was relieved... to know that somewhere in Britain, there was a man named Roger Taylor who had clearly gotten something off his chest (not his chesthair I presume). But as for all the praise of this song being a display of great songwriting genius (referring to the youtube comments mainly), well I failed to hear anything special or memorable. The overall structure was not coherent enough for my ears, and I will be the first to admit that I prefer the kind of music that passes a whistle test of some sort. |
IC 6071 23.11.2009 13:34 |
I am actually pretty impressed... The video seems to have some fairly high marks on youtube under the statistics & data section... 4th most discussed and favorite and 3rd top rated for music videos in the UK today.... Not bad at all! |
vince73 23.11.2009 14:06 |
Hope it's the forerunner for an entire album. The song takes me to his first two solo albums... Don't you? |
The Thinker 23.11.2009 14:09 |
Kick ass tune and respect for Roger. |
Hitman 23.11.2009 14:37 |
pma wrote: After the six minutes, I felt empty. I was relieved... to know that somewhere in Britain, there was a man named Roger Taylor who had clearly gotten something off his chest (not his chesthair I presume). But as for all the praise of this song being a display of great songwriting genius (referring to the youtube comments mainly), well I failed to hear anything special or memorable. The overall structure was not coherent enough for my ears, and I will be the first to admit that I prefer the kind of music that passes a whistle test of some sort. Respectig your point of view, the balance in structure is not a MUST in songwriting; in this context some experiment is welcome in my opinion. cheers! :) |
Mr Mercury 23.11.2009 15:08 |
masterstroke_84 wrote: I love Brian, but I dont understand why he is included in this conversation... this is a SOLO song... and a great one. I know its a solo song. I just happened to mention my thoughts regarding if Brian had played on it as it would have been less personal. |
demonwolf 23.11.2009 16:10 |
It is a fantastic song. Takes me on a journey for the six minutes or so it lasts. Wonderfully laid back with a few unexpected turns, great vocals by Roger and the lyrics are great. I think it is refreshing to hear a protest song that is so obvious what it is about, instead of beating around the point. Grows with every listen too. I must be getting old There's a fire and a fury driven deep into my soul It's the helplessness that comes from being under your control And everything is broken Just great. |
k-m 23.11.2009 18:37 |
Musically speaking, it's probably the most intriguing piece of music by a Queen member since... Well, probably since Brian's "Wilderness" from '98, although "The Unblinking Eye" might actually be better. The moment when he blends the guitar, piano and violin reminds me, strangely enough, of Moby from that era. Lyrically... Well, the man does like to make his point at times. And he does not like being too metaphorical about it:) No more in this respect. All in all, a nice effort which clears the air a bit after... Well, you know. So, fingers crossed. Perhaps it's a start of something interesting really? PS. I could smell some "Space Oddity" in it as well. Could you? |
Makka 23.11.2009 20:00 |
I don't mind the song. I'd like to hear Roger get away from some of the effects he uses on his voice though. I prefer his voice a bit more raw. |
ok.computer 23.11.2009 20:25 |
And may I from a purely aesthetic point of view - doesn't he look well?? He seems to have shed the weight that was dogging him for years. |
fjac1980 23.11.2009 20:26 |
GREAT....ROGER IS THE MOST PROLIFIC MEMBER OF QUEEN.!!!!! SUCH A GREAT TRACK |
vessel 24.11.2009 00:31 |
I have just listened to the song like three times in a row! I love the song! Reminds me of the good old days. |
Togg 24.11.2009 07:04 |
Is this available on iTunes yet? I seriously can't be arsed to go via the Queen shop, they are hopeless, pretty well every oder has been a nightmare to-date. I checked last night and it wasn't there yet, but I hear it's going to be, does anyone know when it's on general release? |
GratefulFan 24.11.2009 09:55 |
Togg wrote: Is this available on iTunes yet? I seriously can't be arsed to go via the Queen shop, they are hopeless, pretty well every oder has been a nightmare to-date. I checked last night and it wasn't there yet, but I hear it's going to be, does anyone know when it's on general release? My first experience with Queenonline yesterday was brutal. The system was so messed I ended up purchasing 3 copies of Roger's song. I read on their message boards that this happened to multiple people. While there reading, I decided to sign up for the forum as well. Apparently some adminstrator has to approve my presence, which has not been done or acknowledged in any further way despite a second inquiry hours later, so my exciting new account is in limbo or dead or sold off to some horrible KISS forum or whatever. Then, when I try to log into the store account this morning it's like I've been wiped from the face of their servers. I can't log in with the credentials I KNOW I used to sign up, and their recovey process is to invite you to submit your personal email address again, tell you they've sent you something with the circa 1998 caveat "if you typed your address in correctly", and then send nothing but silence to your correctly typed in address. So, they've taken my personal contact and credit card information multiple times, taken my money 3 times, effectively locked me out of my own purchase records without so much as an email acknowledging the transaction(s), and essentially behaving as though I don't/didn't/won't ever exist. Seriously the worst online experience I've ever had. |
mickyparise 24.11.2009 11:02 |
vessel wrote: I have just listened to the song like three times in a row! I love the song! Reminds me of the good old days. Exactly my thoughts...... ;> |
Togg 24.11.2009 11:07 |
GratefulFan wrote:Yep that about sums them up I am afraid. Sadly every time they do anything it turns into a nightmare.Togg wrote: Is this available on iTunes yet? I seriously can't be arsed to go via the Queen shop, they are hopeless, pretty well every oder has been a nightmare to-date. I checked last night and it wasn't there yet, but I hear it's going to be, does anyone know when it's on general release?My first experience with Queenonline yesterday was brutal. The system was so messed I ended up purchasing 3 copies of Roger's song. I read on their message boards that this happened to multiple people. While there reading, I decided to sign up for the forum as well. Apparently some adminstrator has to approve my presence, which has not been done or acknowledged in any further way despite a second inquiry hours later, so my exciting new account is in limbo or dead or sold off to some horrible KISS forum or whatever. Then, when I try to log into the store account this morning it's like I've been wiped from the face of their servers. I can't log in with the credentials I KNOW I used to sign up, and their recovey process is to invite you to submit your personal email address again, tell you they've sent you something with the circa 1998 caveat "if you typed your address in correctly", and then send nothing but silence to your correctly typed in address. So, they've taken my personal contact and credit card information multiple times, taken my money 3 times, effectively locked me out of my own purchase records without so much as an email acknowledging the transaction(s), and essentially behaving as though I don't/didn't/won't ever exist. Seriously the worst online experience I've ever had. I will never again use them. Hope you get it sorted shortly, I am sure they will fix it for you but it's no excuse they do this crap everytime, how hard can it be to run a transactional website these days???? |
pittrek 24.11.2009 11:38 |
The songs has some really strong moments. Unfortunately for a person who is not a native english speaker it's a huge problem to understand the lyrics, so I can only guess what the song is about (well definitely about Afghanistan) so I can't comment on that part. After listening to it I feel sorry that Freddie's dead, this song needs his input (like Ga Ga and Magic). The video is one huge mess. It reminds me on Alf's musical video ("You're the one who's out of this world sweet baby") |
GratefulFan 24.11.2009 12:00 |
Here, they might be easier to read: (I nicked these off of the queenonline forum, where I don't exist, and gave the song a listen and tweaked it a bit) God would weep if He existed and He saw what men can do to men He'd think that we were twisted His unblinking eye would blink and then He'd say not in my name you don't you stupid little men with your arrogance and ignorance you do it time and time again And I, I must be gettin' old There's a fire and a fury driven deep into my soul It's the helplessness that comes from being under your control and everything is broken We've got a High street full of holes the High street's full of holes High street's full of holes Five million cameras stare at us you treat us like we're fools Our privacy is meaningless we're suffocated by ten thousand rules And this kingdom's not united just a complicated mess Are we in europe? Half in europe? Not in europe? We're soulless, spineless, directionless And I, I must be getting old There's a fire and a fury driven deep into my soul It's the helplessness that comes from being under your control And everything is broken. Stylophone! And everything is broken Why send our young men out to die in wars that we don't understand? And why on earth should we be meddling in places like Afghanistan? The price is much too high in terms of money or our precious men Your reasons are mysterious and quite beyond our ken And I, I must be getting old There's a fire and a fury driven deep into my soul It's the helplessness that comes, you even sold our gold And everything is broken Except for the 'High street full of holes' the lyrics are basically a very non-metaphorical lament on human behaviour generally and the state of things in the United Kingdom specifically as Roger sees them. There is dissatisfaction with the government, particularly its intrustion into private lives, and with the war in Afghanistan. The cameras are a literal reference to controversial security cameras in many public spaces there. The "Stylophone!" exclamation introduces the instrument as it beings to be heard in the song. Perhaps people who experience UK life first hand can explain more. |
Aisha Sweetness 24.11.2009 13:56 |
I tried to find it but it's not available to download on itunes?? Why is this??? |
cacatua 24.11.2009 18:48 |
Oh, it's not just me then. I don't know at this point if I've bought it or not. It hasn't shown up anywhere, nor have I gotten a receipt. I have no idea............. Condolences Edit: It just occurred to me that this is prophetic - "Everything Is Broken" |
GratefulFan 24.11.2009 19:15 |
Try logging in to the store and then clicking 'Your Account' near the top. That's the last place I saw my 3 copies, back when I used to be able to log in... |
the dude 1366 24.11.2009 20:06 |
This track is just more proof that Roger and Brian should continue doing what they do in whatever form that may be. This track is genius. Roger's solo stuff (and The Cross's 2nd and 3rd albums) are sheer genius. If you hear when Brian joined the Cross onstage in bootlegs, it makes me think that they could have formed some new band (whether as Queen or not, not trying to start debate here). Roger and Brian could have shared vocals with a great live band. As proof, go on youtube and look for "Lucille" by Roger and The Cross with Brian onstage. It blew my mind! Seriously! And the first line of "Eye" set the tone perfectly for the rest of the song! Great work, Rog! |
iron eagle 24.11.2009 20:19 |
heard the rest of it on youtube now hearing the whole thing i can say i like it i dont think its a masterpiece by any means or think its Roger's best song ever but thats just my opinion i wish him luck with it |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 25.11.2009 05:53 |
Pim Derks wrote: Nice track. Not the kind of track I hoped, but still quite cool. Would be nice to see this on an album, along with some other new tracks. I'd love to hear a version of Small with Roger on vocals! I like it as well. Maybe Roger could have named it "A Nation of Happiness"? :) Cheers, Ogre- |
cmsdrums 25.11.2009 07:44 |
The Dude wrote:
If you hear when Brian joined the Cross onstage in bootlegs, it makes me think that they could have formed some new band (whether as Queen or not, not trying to start debate here). Roger and Brian could have shared vocals with a great live band.
I agree - it would be good if they could shake off the Queen tag (as Brian stated for years that he wanted to do) and just form a new band. Look at: Duff, Matt and Slash in Velvet Revolver without becoming a GnR tribute Dave Grohl with Foo Fighters (some kids even don't know of Nirvana!) John Paul Jones and Dave Grohl (Again!) with Them Crooked Vultures. If artists call their project a new name and form it with other musicians, they have every chance of it being treated as a seperate entity, even when their previous bands were as huge as Guns n Roses, Nirvana and even Led Zep. |
mooghead 25.11.2009 14:30 |
I have a bit of a problem listening to a multi millionaire who has had a fairytale life squalking on about how horrible the world is. And why is he talking about our Ken? Our Ken it sat here watchin Emmerdale, whats he done wrong? |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 25.11.2009 20:40 |
mooghead wrote: I have a bit of a problem listening to a multi millionaire who has had a fairytale life squalking on about how horrible the world is. (...) Yeah, I see what you mean, I also have a bit of that feeling. But, hey, what about those that have had a fairytale life and don't bother to discuss the problems of the world? ;) Cheers, Ogre- |
Sheer Brass Neck 25.11.2009 21:51 |
So, Mooghead, if you're rich, does that mean that you have no right to be upset and angry with how things are? If that's the case, wouldn't that a rich person arrogant and uncaring about those who don't have the welath they have? BTW, your comment about the avatar face if Michael "bummed" you was splendid. Top marks for that! |
Brandon The Great 25.11.2009 22:49 |
I'm in agreement with Paul on this one. It's OK, listenable, but I wouldn't place it naywhere near the top of Roger's works. Also, perhaps the production isn't as great as it could be? Maybe Roger's vocals are too loud? Or, perhaps, his voice is not as good as it once was. And, even though I agree with the message s communicated in the song, I'm a bit tired of these songs from Roger. I'd love another Strange Frontier. Or, perhaps I need to get a grip on my verisimilitude. |
Serry... 26.11.2009 11:53 |
That "Order status: sent.for.package" bit of the track is something special in whole Roger's solo career. |
philip storey 26.11.2009 12:59 |
I thought the first 3 minutes of The Unblinking Eye were excellant, but boy it goes down hill very quickly after that !!! Good to see that Roger is at least making some new tunes for us to enjoy !?! |
cacatua 27.11.2009 21:08 |
GratefulFan wrote: Try logging in to the store and then clicking 'Your Account' near the top. That's the last place I saw my 3 copies, back when I used to be able to log in...I finally found it. Now trying to figure out the mysteries of Windows Media Player, as everything else I've got is on iTunes. Did you ever get the mess straightened out? |
Makka 28.11.2009 08:11 |
mooghead wrote: I have a bit of a problem listening to a multi millionaire who has had a fairytale life squalking on about how horrible the world is. And why is he talking about our Ken? Our Ken it sat here watchin Emmerdale, whats he done wrong? And who the f**k is Ken?? I gather he's not referring to Barbie's bit on the side?? I dare say outside of the UK this means absolutely nothing? |
queenside 28.11.2009 09:11 |
is roger playing drums and guitar on this song like seen in the video? does anyone know who are other musicians playing on this track and what instruments do they play? |
Pim Derks 28.11.2009 09:17 |
I hope Roger recorded everything himself, like he did on Fun In Space. Bring on the sequel to that album! :) |
Sebastian 28.11.2009 10:00 |
I've just heard the song and absolutely adored it. I was also very pleased about watching Roger playing piano (had never seen that before). He's still got a fantastic voice. And I loved the lyrics and melody. I hope that's the future for Rog: more solo career, less American Idol losers. |
TheAmazingEvent 28.11.2009 16:45 |
link A shorter reedit of the song if anyones interested |
Bohardy 29.11.2009 07:25 |
Makka wrote:mooghead wrote: I have a bit of a problem listening to a multi millionaire who has had a fairytale life squalking on about how horrible the world is. And why is he talking about our Ken? Our Ken it sat here watchin Emmerdale, whats he done wrong?And who the f**k is Ken?? I gather he's not referring to Barbie's bit on the side?? I dare say outside of the UK this means absolutely nothing? "...quite beyond our ken". In this context, ken simply means 'understanding' or 'knowledge'. It's just a relatively obscure word for that. In Scots English, ken is frequently used to mean 'understand', as in ' do you ken what i'm talking about?' |
YourValentine 30.11.2009 03:25 |
Thank you, Bohardy ,for helping us out with thre lyrics again:-) Can you tell us what Roger sings towards the end - it's quoted like that in this thread: It's the helplessness that comes You even sold our gold And everything is broken I don't believe he sings "you even sold our gold" - it makes no sense at all. |
Mkls 30.11.2009 03:39 |
YourValentine wrote: Thank you, Bohardy ,for helping us out with thre lyrics again:-) Can you tell us what Roger sings towards the end - it's quoted like that in this thread: It's the helplessness that comes You even sold our gold And everything is broken I don't believe he sings "you even sold our gold" - it makes no sense at all. it does actually... the Bank of England sold more than 50% of its gold reserves at the bottom of a 20 year price movement, initiated by HM Treasury... link link |
mike hunt 30.11.2009 04:09 |
Finally heard the song. Much much much better than anything on TCR, except maybe for "somethings that glitter" not that's it's anything groundbreaking by any means , but it's sincere. I like roger's voice these days. nice piano work in there. Like it better than anything rogers done solo wise, .... I usually find his solo stuff mostly forgettable. Nice little song by roger!.....Is he releasing a full album?...or Just this single? |
Holly2003 30.11.2009 04:26 |
Listened again: I still think it's a bit dull. Okay, so Rog plays piano and guitar, good for him, but he doesn't play them very well. It's all very simple stuff, that a beginner could play. That doesn't make the song bad -- some very good songs are simple and basic -- but there's just nothing to make this song stand out. Where's the fire? Where's the passion? Where are the great lyrics? It's a long moan about the state of Britain, no different to Brian's soapbox entries. FFS cheer up Rog! Let's have another song about cars, girls, or ... haircuts! |
mike hunt 30.11.2009 04:33 |
I'm not sure roger would write about girls and cars at 60 years of age. Yea, the subject is played out, but it's still sounds like a nice ballad. It probably is forgettabe, it doesn't seem like a song that will make me buy 5 copies, but it sounds nice. Sincere is the word, and it doesn't have the Queen name attached to it. I compare it with happiness and electric fire, not the awsome tenament funster, modern times rock n roll, i'm in love with my car. Those songs wouldn't sound right if roger did them now. unless you think he would look good with a earing thru his nose like in 1973. |
Holly2003 30.11.2009 05:35 |
mike hunt wrote: I'm not sure roger would write about girls and cars at 60 years of age. Yea, the subject is played out, but it's still sounds like a nice ballad. It probably is forgettabe, it doesn't seem like a song that will make me buy 5 copies, but it sounds nice. Sincere is the word, and it doesn't have the Queen name attached to it. I compare it with happiness and electric fire, not the awsome tenament funster, modern times rock n roll, i'm in love with my car. Those songs wouldn't sound right if roger did them now. unless you think he would look good with a earing thru his nose like in 1973. A hairpiece on his chest and a ring through his nose? He could give it a try, I suppose. He can write about what he likes, of course, and maybe he feels like doing political stuff -- fair enough -- but this just isn't very good. I doubt anyone would listen to it if it wasn't Roger. And Roger's track record on political songs isn;t great. He's not a great lyricist even when writing about simple things like cars, so political stuff isn't likely to bring out the best in him lyrically. It's not dreadful, but neither is it dreadfully good. I suppose though we should be thankful he's still keen to make new music, esp. as Brian seems to be leaving the music world behind. |
john bodega 30.11.2009 09:14 |
People are missing the most important issue here - did you SEE how cool his shoes are???? |
YourValentine 30.11.2009 09:52 |
Lol Zebonka, yes I noticed :-) As to the line about selling the gold: okay it makes sense in a factual way but in terms of grammar it still sounds more than weird to me - even worse than the rhyme meddling - in Afghanistan (hello Holly :-)) |
pittrek 30.11.2009 11:05 |
After cca 20 views I still can't remember the main melody . I think it says it all. We can only wonder what would Freddie do with this song. GrateFulFan - thanks a lot for the lyrics, now I know what's it about :) |
mike hunt 01.12.2009 02:54 |
Holly2003 wrote:mike hunt wrote: I'm not sure roger would write about girls and cars at 60 years of age. Yea, the subject is played out, but it's still sounds like a nice ballad. It probably is forgettabe, it doesn't seem like a song that will make me buy 5 copies, but it sounds nice. Sincere is the word, and it doesn't have the Queen name attached to it. I compare it with happiness and electric fire, not the awsome tenament funster, modern times rock n roll, i'm in love with my car. Those songs wouldn't sound right if roger did them now. unless you think he would look good with a earing thru his nose like in 1973.A hairpiece on his chest and a ring through his nose? He could give it a try, I suppose. He can write about what he likes, of course, and maybe he feels like doing political stuff -- fair enough -- but this just isn't very good. I doubt anyone would listen to it if it wasn't Roger. And Roger's track record on political songs isn;t great. He's not a great lyricist even when writing about simple things like cars, so political stuff isn't likely to bring out the best in him lyrically. It's not dreadful, but neither is it dreadfully good. I suppose though we should be thankful he's still keen to make new music, esp. as Brian seems to be leaving the music world behind. " a hairpiece on his chest and ring through his nose" that's the line I was looking for. Great tune! |
mike hunt 01.12.2009 02:57 |
pittrek wrote: After cca 20 views I still can't remember the main melody . I think it says it all. We can only wonder what would Freddie do with this song. GrateFulFan - thanks a lot for the lyrics, now I know what's it about :)Freddie usually did good things for rogers songs. I think roger misses freddie's input more than anyone. |
Sebastian 01.12.2009 07:28 |
Holly2003 wrote: Okay, so Rog plays piano and guitar, good for him, but he doesn't play them very well. It's all very simple stuff, that a beginner could play. Playing simple stuff is not the same as not playing very well. While he's surely not a virtuoso on either, he's certainly more than merely a beginner. It's way better having a person playing simple stuff very well (e.g. Fred and Crazy Little Thing, Brian and Dear Friends) than having a person complicating things to the point of not being able to play them properly (e.g. ...) |
Togg 01.12.2009 07:59 |
Sebastian wrote: Holly2003 wrote: Okay, so Rog plays piano and guitar, good for him, but he doesn't play them very well. It's all very simple stuff, that a beginner could play.Playing simple stuff is not the same as not playing very well. While he's surely not a virtuoso on either, he's certainly more than merely a beginner. It's way better having a person playing simple stuff very well (e.g. Fred and Crazy Little Thing, Brian and Dear Friends) than having a person complicating things to the point of not being able to play them properly (e.g. ...) Basic song structure or lyrics have nothing to do with whether the track is good or not. Most of the best pop songs ever recorded are very basic that even beginers can master, most Beatles tracks for one. However they are simply some of the best songs ever written Roger not good at lyrics? well OK so he comes up with a few cheesy lines here and there, but he has a wonderful way of getting his point across, personally I love his lyrics they make me laugh and cry...Old Friends, The days of our lives, Shove it....fantastic all of them for different reasons Anyone that makes a comment such as "well a beginner could play it" has simply no understanding of the craft of song writting, you don't sit there trying to do complex song structure for the hell of it, or to make it 'worthy' Simple is Smart as someone once told me! Anyway, this track is in my view personal, heart felt and nicely constructed, is it a hit, no, but that wasnt the intention, he can write hits when he wants to. |
Sebastian 01.12.2009 14:53 |
I still disagree about 'even beginners can master'. They may learn the notes and play them in the correct tempo and rhythm, but that's not all it takes to 'master' them. There are loads of people who play guitar a hell of a lot better than Freddie ever could, but still can't master Crazy Little Thing; there are loads of people who can sing note by note something like All Dead, but still can't master it. And so on. The difference between a beginner and an expert (or something going in between) is not only noticed by their repertoire and the difficulty of what they do - a simple piano part like the one in TUE would sound sloppy and horrible if done by a rookie, even if he or she did the same notes in the same order; of course Roger's not a professional pianist, but he's good enough to make that bit sound well, which is a hell of a lot more than being a rookie. Apparently, during the Queen era, he was indeed a person who only experimented with synths but wasn't a player. Clearly that's changed through the years and I'm very pleased about that. |
Holly2003 01.12.2009 15:59 |
Sebastian wrote:Holly2003 wrote: Okay, so Rog plays piano and guitar, good for him, but he doesn't play them very well. It's all very simple stuff, that a beginner could play.Playing simple stuff is not the same as not playing very well. While he's surely not a virtuoso on either, he's certainly more than merely a beginner. It's way better having a person playing simple stuff very well (e.g. Fred and Crazy Little Thing, Brian and Dear Friends) than having a person complicating things to the point of not being able to play them properly (e.g. ...) Why did you ignore the rest of my quote? "That doesn't make the song bad -- some very good songs are simple and basic -- but there's just nothing to make this song stand out." Maybe I didnt choose my words too carefully when I said he doesnt play them 'well', but surely the rest of what I said puts that in context. I didn't say he was a beginner, I said he has written a fairly basic song that a beginner could play (on piano and guitar). He is not stretching himself, which, for someone who has been in the business as long as he has, is a bit disappointing. A bit like Brian May's playing on C-lebrtity or TCR: being simple doesn't automatically make them bad songs (as stated previously), but I'd like to see a bit more adventure and innovation from a 'guitar great'. IMO nothing stands out about this song. The lyrics are bland and there's nothing about the music to make it stand out from a million other songs. However, it's still nice to hear Roger sing and see him make an effort when Brian is off taking pics of orbs or the moon. |
cacatua 01.12.2009 16:58 |
Holly2003 wrote: Maybe I didnt choose my words too carefully when I said he doesnt play them 'well', but surely the rest of what I said puts that in context. I didn't say he was a beginner, I said he has written a fairly basic song that a beginner could play (on piano and guitar). He is not stretching himself, which, for someone who has been in the business as long as he has, is a bit disappointing. A bit like Brian May's playing on C-lebrtity or TCR: being simple doesn't automatically make them bad songs (as stated previously), but I'd like to see a bit more adventure and innovation from a 'guitar great'. IMO nothing stands out about this song. The lyrics are bland and there's nothing about the music to make it stand out from a million other songs. However, it's still nice to hear Roger sing and see him make an effort when Brian is off taking pics of orbs or the moon. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't know how old you are. I am nearly as old as Brian and Roger. Age has a way of changing one's perspective on many things, including what one may think of as being worthwhile, challenging or fun. At the risk of being called a "Stepford" again, I think you are being far too critical of what the guys might be up to these days. They have had their day when everything was a new challenge that they must rise to meet. I think that they are now in the time of life when they can reap some rewards for what they did when they were younger and Queen was whole, and do what appeals to them, without feeling that need to be in there swinging and competing with everyone else out there. I like Roger's song, but then I like much of TCR, so what do I know? |
Holly2003 01.12.2009 17:07 |
cacatua wrote: Holly2003 wrote: Maybe I didnt choose my words too carefully when I said he doesnt play them 'well', but surely the rest of what I said puts that in context. I didn't say he was a beginner, I said he has written a fairly basic song that a beginner could play (on piano and guitar). He is not stretching himself, which, for someone who has been in the business as long as he has, is a bit disappointing. A bit like Brian May's playing on C-lebrtity or TCR: being simple doesn't automatically make them bad songs (as stated previously), but I'd like to see a bit more adventure and innovation from a 'guitar great'. IMO nothing stands out about this song. The lyrics are bland and there's nothing about the music to make it stand out from a million other songs. However, it's still nice to hear Roger sing and see him make an effort when Brian is off taking pics of orbs or the moon. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't know how old you are. I am nearly as old as Brian and Roger. Age has a way of changing one's perspective on many things, including what one may think of as being worthwhile, challenging or fun. At the risk of being called a "Stepford" again, I think you are being far too critical of what the guys might be up to these days. They have had their day when everything was a new challenge that they must rise to meet. I think that they are now in the time of life when they can reap some rewards for what they did when they were younger and Queen was whole, and do what appeals to them, without feeling that need to be in there swinging and competing with everyone else out there. I like Roger's song, but then I like much of TCR, so what do I know? I wouldn't say I particularly like TCR but I was prepared to give it, and Q+PR a chance. Unlike other Queen LPs, I hardly listen to it. I gave it a few listens when it came out, and it;s just okay. Some Things that Glitter stands out, and Surf's Up is interesting, but the rest of the album is pretty dull. I'd like to see them make anoterh album with Rodgers: maybe they'll be a bit more innovative. As for the age thing, it's understandable but, to be blunt, no excuse for mediocrity. I've learned to live with the fact that they'll do what they like, and no amount of moaning from us is going to change that. However, that dose of reality doesn't make an average record like Unblinking Eye, a good or great one. |
Sebastian 01.12.2009 17:23 |
'I said he has written a fairly basic song that a beginner could play (on piano and guitar)' There I agree. A fairly basic song that a beginner could play --> Yes A fairly basic song that a beginner could master --> No |
cacatua 01.12.2009 18:07 |
Holly2003 wrote: I wouldn't say I particularly like TCR but I was prepared to give it, and Q+PR a chance. Unlike other Queen LPs, I hardly listen to it. I gave it a few listens when it came out, and it;s just okay. Some Things that Glitter stands out, and Surf's Up is interesting, but the rest of the album is pretty dull. I'd like to see them make anoterh album with Rodgers: maybe they'll be a bit more innovative. As for the age thing, it's understandable but, to be blunt, no excuse for mediocrity. I've learned to live with the fact that they'll do what they like, and no amount of moaning from us is going to change that. However, that dose of reality doesn't make an average record like Unblinking Eye, a good or great one. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ha - well it is Paul's vocals on some of TCR that bug me. I think his gawd-awful screams are terrible on Surf's Up. He sounds like he is shrieking to frighten a bear away or some such. I usually skip that one. And his long moans, or whatever you call them, in Time To Shine and Through The Night sound awkward and self-conscious instead of melodic and flowing. |
GratefulFan 01.12.2009 19:56 |
Due to All Right Now, Feel Like Makin' Love and Shooting Star, Paul is forgiven for every lousy thing he's ever done, ever will do, or is doing at this very moment. Even the bear screaming. |
mike hunt 02.12.2009 02:46 |
cacatua wrote: Holly2003 wrote: Maybe I didnt choose my words too carefully when I said he doesnt play them 'well', but surely the rest of what I said puts that in context. I didn't say he was a beginner, I said he has written a fairly basic song that a beginner could play (on piano and guitar). He is not stretching himself, which, for someone who has been in the business as long as he has, is a bit disappointing. A bit like Brian May's playing on C-lebrtity or TCR: being simple doesn't automatically make them bad songs (as stated previously), but I'd like to see a bit more adventure and innovation from a 'guitar great'. IMO nothing stands out about this song. The lyrics are bland and there's nothing about the music to make it stand out from a million other songs. However, it's still nice to hear Roger sing and see him make an effort when Brian is off taking pics of orbs or the moon. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't know how old you are. I am nearly as old as Brian and Roger. Age has a way of changing one's perspective on many things, including what one may think of as being worthwhile, challenging or fun. At the risk of being called a "Stepford" again, I think you are being far too critical of what the guys might be up to these days. They have had their day when everything was a new challenge that they must rise to meet. I think that they are now in the time of life when they can reap some rewards for what they did when they were younger and Queen was whole, and do what appeals to them, without feeling that need to be in there swinging and competing with everyone else out there. I like Roger's song, but then I like much of TCR, so what do I know? not bad mouthing anyone, but some people don't like anything from queen past 1979, while others it's 1991. Then of course you get the stefords who like every note the band plays. I think holly belongs in the first group. If it wasn't recorded in 1976 it's crap. I could be wrong of course holly! |
Ken8 02.12.2009 02:58 |
Makka wrote:mooghead wrote: I have a bit of a problem listening to a multi millionaire who has had a fairytale life squalking on about how horrible the world is. And why is he talking about our Ken? Our Ken it sat here watchin Emmerdale, whats he done wrong?And who the f**k is Ken?? I gather he's not referring to Barbie's bit on the side?? I dare say outside of the UK this means absolutely nothing? No, it was nice of him to acknowledge me. Thanks Roger. I suppose he's getting on but like "TCR", it's very MOR again. I'm in my mid forties, and I found out today that my Dad likes it. Don't get me wrong, I don't mind the song, but they just sound so "safe" lately. Bland. The sooner he hooks up with Taylor Hawkins the better! ....actually IIRC, "Beyond Our Ken" is a term derived from the title of a 1950's BBC radio comedy series where it's star, Kenneth Horne comically locked horns with off the wall characters like "Julian & Sandy" & "Sid Rumpo" as played by Kenneth Williams. So, yes. It seems to be a reference that is meaningless to anyone outside the UK, or anyone under fifty years of age! Rock on Rog! The kids can't get enough of 1950's BBC radio show references! Next time try the "Goons" or if you're feeling particularly daring, "Pete & Dud" |
Holly2003 02.12.2009 04:27 |
mike hunt wrote: not bad mouthing anyone, but some people don't like anything from queen past 1979, while others it's 1991. Then of course you get the stefords who like every note the band plays. I think holly belongs in the first group. If it wasn't recorded in 1976 it's crap. I could be wrong of course holly! I don't think they've done anything since The Game/Flash Gordon that is better than anything done previous to that, so you're probably along the right track. It's not due to the dates, but the quality of their stuff, and the unfortunate pop trends they chose to follow from 1982 onwards. Plus, as someone said earlier, the older artists get, the lazier they tend to be. For most bands, their best stuff is early in their career, when they're hungry and need to make their mark in the world. I've always found Roger's solo stuff interesting and he is occasionally very good, but his work is uneven, as the UE shows. |
Sebastian 02.12.2009 07:02 |
Had Body Language been on 'A Night at the Opera' (well, those synths didn't exist in '75 but let's ignore that for the sake of argument), I'd still hate it. And indeed, another example is Paul McCartney: since his 'Abbey Road' medley he's written loads of good songs, loads of mediocre ones, loads of great tunes, but IMO nothing close to his Beatle work. |
cacatua 02.12.2009 10:58 |
Holly2003 wrote: I don't think they've done anything since The Game/Flash Gordon that is better than anything done previous to that, so you're probably along the right track. It's not due to the dates, but the quality of their stuff, and the unfortunate pop trends they chose to follow from 1982 onwards. Plus, as someone said earlier, the older artists get, the lazier they tend to be. For most bands, their best stuff is early in their career, when they're hungry and need to make their mark in the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't think that lazy is quite a fair assessment. As you get older it takes more and more effort to do the same things. It creeps up on you, becoming apparent sometime in your 50's. Say that guitar solo that you used to fly through now requires more effort due to the accumulated damage to your finger and wrist joints, which makes you slower and perhaps a bit clumsy if you are pushing it. A couple more years or so and when you are on a tour, playing frequently and for long stints, you get tendinitis - excruciatingly painful, like a hot poker being dragged through the tendon sheath. That disables you for weeks. Also doing the same thing you have done for the last 30-40 years is just not as exciting, unless you have some epiphany that causes you to see it in a whole new light that gets you excited again. But moving your attention to different fields of interest that you either discover, or which have been on the back burner for years due to your chosen course in life, does get you excited, now that you are able to pursue them. Becoming excited about something new propells you to plunge in, in a way that you may no longer be able to muster for your original calling - it makes you feel alive again and overcomes the physical baggage, unless you are blessed with some other nasty aging thing that comes with the new endeavor. Brian, who's thoughts are somewhat known from his soap box, tends to be plagued with depression, so I'm guessing that he needs that excitement of being involved with something that fascinates him to stay out of the doldrums. He also had trouble with one of his hands on the last tour and has friends in the industry who are also experiencing the same. Sorry if that is being a Stepford. I am trying not to let the curmudgeon out again, but I just couldn't let that lazy comment slide! |
Holly2003 02.12.2009 11:30 |
All good points. However, Still Burning is lazy ;) I dont think it's accurate to say Brian and Roger aren't physically capable of doing innovative stuff, because innovative doesn't necessarily mean super-fast runs up the neck or playing two guitars at a time etc. Brian has always said his best work is planned out in advance and then he makes his fingers go to new places. Otherwise, he says he just keeps going to the same licks and runs. I suppose it's a little like writing: innovation starts in the mind, and the fingers then do the spadework. TCR didn't have much going for it in that respect. However, the Nelson mandella songs were pretty good, even if the lyrics weren't up to scratch. That was ambitious and interesting, so they can still do it. Also, for me it's not all about innovation. I'd also be happy with a traditional Queen sound. Brian has shown in Some Things That Glitter that he can still do his trademark harmonies is a very tasteful way. Compare that song to Sail Away Sweet Sister and it stands up well. It's a pity the rest of the album was simple riffs and 12-bar nonsense. |
cacatua 02.12.2009 14:27 |
I don't think they are physically incapable, though the physical part becomes a rising factor the older thay get. That's just life. You learn to cope or move on. It is more likely that they are uninspired. Perhaps Brian should take to writing some songs about ambushing fox hunters or rescuing hedge hogs? What turns Roger's crank these days, outside of being cranky? |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 02.12.2009 18:53 |
cacatua wrote: (...) Perhaps Brian should take to writing some songs about ambushing fox hunters or rescuing hedge hogs? (...) LOL good one. Maybe an exciting riff or wonderful harmonies could arise from the story of an ancient village or from a stereoscope being thrown at somebody? Cheers, Ogre- |
mike hunt 03.12.2009 03:39 |
Everyone has a prime. It's not easy losing a key member of your group. Freddie was very important in a lot of ways. yea, Queen to the game they were on fire, and did very little wrong. after "the game" they were inconsistent, though still some brilliant moments. Innuendo was another vintage album. Not everything is gonna be great. |
Sebastian 03.12.2009 09:34 |
mike hunt wrote: It's not easy losing a key member of your group. Let alone two: John's contributions were crucial. |
mike hunt 04.12.2009 10:53 |
very true!....John was very Important. TCR misses his Imput. |
inu-liger 05.12.2009 20:14 |
GratefulFan wrote: Due to All Right Now, Feel Like Makin' Love and Shooting Star, Paul is forgiven for every lousy thing he's ever done, ever will do, or is doing at this very moment. Even the bear screaming. Call me potentially mistaken, but I recall reading in a news article long ago (regarding the uncredited sampling of that Jill Nakamuro (csp?) news report relating to Hawaiian surfing on "Surf's Up . . . School's Out!") that Justin Shirley-Smith "confirmed" the screams were actually Roger's? |
cacatua 05.12.2009 20:47 |
inu-liger wrote:GratefulFan wrote: Due to All Right Now, Feel Like Makin' Love and Shooting Star, Paul is forgiven for every lousy thing he's ever done, ever will do, or is doing at this very moment. Even the bear screaming.Call me potentially mistaken, but I recall reading in a news article long ago (regarding the uncredited sampling of that Jill Nakamuro (csp?) news report relating to Hawaiian surfing on "Surf's Up . . . School's Out!") that Justin Shirley-Smith "confirmed" the screams were actually Roger's? The bear had Roger up a tree then? Reminds me of an old Phil Harris song........... |
john bodega 06.12.2009 01:32 |
Brian has never recovered psychologically from falling into the piano pit. |
enjoli taylor 07.12.2009 13:55 |
I just want to say one thing- Roger Meddows Taylor- is amazing. Thank you!! |
catqueen 07.12.2009 18:52 |
This is a delayed reaction, but I love the Unblinking Eye! I think it is true Roger, and is a brilliant creative idea. There are a lot of songs with a message out there, and they get irritating, but i liked this - creative, and well written. Its not preachy, or condescending or unnecessarily melodramatic. I like it. And Roger is ... how do i say it... not exactly known for the depths of his lyrics, but they tend to be quirky and catchy and upbeat. The same applies here, it i think it is a perfect tone for the song. If it was written in a preachy, deep or pointed way, it would be too heavy, but it is a cool song. I likeses it, as gollum would say. |
Unblinking Eye 11.12.2009 00:57 |
Wow!! Great work from Roger again! A brilliantly constructed song, with good, strong vocals with excellent playing of more instruments. And though the song is purely political and a protest song, it really moves me, as he has weaved the lyrics and the music enough not to be boring, but to actually be very interesting and very educational. I knew what the situation in Afghanistan was, but he just pointed out in a very poignant song!! Well done Rog! |
roy_fokker 11.12.2009 05:40 |
Just one question: Roger says he will do a short tour, confirms he's planning a collaboration with Taylor Hawkins.. but.. how about The Unblinking Eye? Is it an isolated single, or will it be part of an album? Has anyone heard about this? Roy. |
dragon-fly 12.12.2009 12:55 |
Sorry guys, but more than ok this song won't get from me. It's a good B-side, that's it. And, yes, I have listened to it 6 times. The line about Europe is disastrous actually. Plus some shots are quite ridiculous for such song. I'm glad that he did this effort, though he had much better things on his solos before. |
Pim Derks 12.12.2009 17:08 |
roy_fokker wrote: Just one question: Roger says he will do a short tour, confirms he's planning a collaboration with Taylor Hawkins.. but.. how about The Unblinking Eye? Is it an isolated single, or will it be part of an album? Has anyone heard about this? Roy. Apparently the QOL admin has been in contact with Roger's people and has some news soon. I hope it's an album - a tour would be great, but I prefer NEW music :) |
Peta 27.12.2009 13:35 |
Has anyone recorded the song from radio? Please, could you upload it?? |
inu-liger 28.12.2009 19:18 |
Peta wrote: Has anyone recorded the song from radio? Please, could you upload it?? Cheeky lil' bugger, why here you go oh poor little man :-) link |