Borhap80 30.05.2009 11:46 |
I have to admit that I was struck by lightening when I heard We Are the Champions performed by Queen and Adam Lambert, and the other guy ;) This is the first time ever, sincerely, that I felt the power, pomp and drama of Queen since Freddie left the stage. Queen have performed, recorded and played with a number of vocalists - but this time everything felt into place. Lambert brought back the camp, flamboyance, fun and crazy - with a performance of power, uniqueness, flair and range. This has to be a Made in Heaven combination. And at the time I'm writing this, messageboards, newspapers and chats have people going mad discussing this collaboration or meeting. It seems like a LOT of people would like this to happen. Consider me in. Although I liked The Cosmos Rockin, and still do; still it lacked the drama and pomp that we expect from a Queen album. Yes, it was a new venture, a new take within the Queen format - but still something was missing; the "over the top-singing", the unorthodox arrangements and humour - this can happen now. Whereas The Cosmos Rocking was a safe, straightforward, predictable blues/rock album - we now may get the chance to finally see Queen strike back with strength and power performing and creating a kind of macic - a new fresh, epic glam rock/metal of our time. Lambert will give them this, by inserting humour, freshness, versaility, range and theatricality. And what an insanely perfect way to be re-born in the States again? Try to imagine this vocal god to perform "Somebody to Love", "Death on two legs", "Now I'm Here" and "Innuendo"!? This will be the perfect opportunity to close the chapter and history of Queen as a performing band. Have fun and take the world with storm by setting a new standard - with fresh, rocky new albums and spectacular live concerts. What do you think? |
argQ 30.05.2009 12:38 |
Please, forget this TV guy. Can he write new songs? Can he play any instrument? He has a good voice, but that's all. I think Queen is something big for him. Only Paul can do it properly. Q+PR was a fantastic combination. |
andreas_mercury 30.05.2009 13:41 |
Thomas Tønnesen wrote: I have to admit that I was struck by lightening when I heard We Are the Champions performed by Queen and Adam Lambert, and the other guy ;) This is the first time ever, sincerely, that I felt the power, pomp and drama of Queen since Freddie left the stage. Queen have performed, recorded and played with a number of vocalists - but this time everything felt into place. Lambert brought back the camp, flamboyance, fun and crazy - with a performance of power, uniqueness, flair and range. This has to be a Made in Heaven combination. And at the time I'm writing this, messageboards, newspapers and chats have people going mad discussing this collaboration or meeting. It seems like a LOT of people would like this to happen. Consider me in. Although I liked The Cosmos Rockin, and still do; still it lacked the drama and pomp that we expect from a Queen album. Yes, it was a new venture, a new take within the Queen format - but still something was missing; the "over the top-singing", the unorthodox arrangements and humour - this can happen now. Whereas The Cosmos Rocking was a safe, straightforward, predictable blues/rock album - we now may get the chance to finally see Queen strike back with strength and power performing and creating a kind of macic - a new fresh, epic glam rock/metal of our time. Lambert will give them this, by inserting humour, freshness, versaility, range and theatricality. And what an insanely perfect way to be re-born in the States again? Try to imagine this vocal god to perform "Somebody to Love", "Death on two legs", "Now I'm Here" and "Innuendo"!? This will be the perfect opportunity to close the chapter and history of Queen as a performing band. Have fun and take the world with storm by setting a new standard - with fresh, rocky new albums and spectacular live concerts. What do you think?i think you are optimistic. |
andreas_mercury 30.05.2009 13:42 |
argQ wrote: Please, forget this TV guy. Can he write new songs? Can he play any instrument? He has a good voice, but that's all. I think Queen is something big for him. Only Paul can do it properly. Q+PR was a fantastic combination.LOL NOW i have heard it all for 5 years we have been told lots "Freddie was Queen, no Freddie - no Queen" and "RIP 1991" now there are people to mourn Paul Rogers?!?! :D perfect "no queen without Paul Rogers, RIP 2009" |
Bulsarian 30.05.2009 14:20 |
I think Adam would be horrible for Queen as a singer imo. |
L-R-TIGER1994 30.05.2009 14:22 |
andreas_mercury wrote:Thomas Tønnesen wrote: I have to admit that I was struck by lightening when I heard We Are the Champions performed by Queen and Adam Lambert, and the other guy ;) This is the first time ever, sincerely, that I felt the power, pomp and drama of Queen since Freddie left the stage. Queen have performed, recorded and played with a number of vocalists - but this time everything felt into place. Lambert brought back the camp, flamboyance, fun and crazy - with a performance of power, uniqueness, flair and range. This has to be a Made in Heaven combination. And at the time I'm writing this, messageboards, newspapers and chats have people going mad discussing this collaboration or meeting. It seems like a LOT of people would like this to happen. Consider me in. Although I liked The Cosmos Rockin, and still do; still it lacked the drama and pomp that we expect from a Queen album. Yes, it was a new venture, a new take within the Queen format - but still something was missing; the "over the top-singing", the unorthodox arrangements and humour - this can happen now. Whereas The Cosmos Rocking was a safe, straightforward, predictable blues/rock album - we now may get the chance to finally see Queen strike back with strength and power performing and creating a kind of macic - a new fresh, epic glam rock/metal of our time. Lambert will give them this, by inserting humour, freshness, versaility, range and theatricality. And what an insanely perfect way to be re-born in the States again? Try to imagine this vocal god to perform "Somebody to Love", "Death on two legs", "Now I'm Here" and "Innuendo"!? This will be the perfect opportunity to close the chapter and history of Queen as a performing band. Have fun and take the world with storm by setting a new standard - with fresh, rocky new albums and spectacular live concerts. What do you think?i think you are optimistic. I think you are too optimistic! |
Borhap80 30.05.2009 15:12 |
Maybe I'm way too optimistic ;) |
Saif 30.05.2009 22:25 |
FACT: Adam Lambert will neither cure cancer nor bring world peace. |
john bodega 31.05.2009 01:47 |
I think he's a tremendous singer but I mean come on ... joining Queen? He'd really have to do a serious job of earning some stripes first I think. He has the voice and the character to sing for a band like Queen but God only knows if he can write a tune worthy of those guys ... and so soon after Paul Rodgers has left the picture? It'd be laughable. |
Michael Allred 31.05.2009 02:36 |
The more I think about it, the more I'd like to see this happen. |
Pim Derks 31.05.2009 04:37 |
It would be better if Brian and Roger just called it a day then going out with ANOTHER new singer who will surely have the same problem as Paul. People comparing him to Freddy, people not caring about him, people moaning that 'Freddy sang it better', people complaining that 'he looks bored'. |
john bodega 31.05.2009 05:13 |
Yeah who the fuck would want that job?? The number one reason I would've quit Q+PR if I were Paul would have to be that more people were cheering for the dead guy than they were for me... |
marcenciels 31.05.2009 10:15 |
Queen's career was often fueled with bad press...and Freddie getting most of the low blows. most of those press/columnist had to admit that he was unique, and now defend his memory. so...who will be worthy to take Paul's place now ?...he took his share of low blows ;) i thought this combination was interresting, because of the musical back ground they could perform. Lambert...hummm....it would be safe to say that they will simply write a few songs for him, for his very probable album. as for joining Queen ?...time will tell... it would be nice in a way...maybe...because with his range, we could get to hear song's Paul just couldnt do. whoever will be the new front man...it would be important that he can give a wider choice in the Queen catalogue. because, two tours with the same old and just the TCR songs added ? that left me a bit dissapointed. |
Pim Derks 31.05.2009 10:52 |
I don't think a tour with a singer which could sing the more 'Freddy'-songs would actually contain more Freddy-songs in the setlist. Look at the Freddy Mercury Tribute - even when he was barely dead and a gig was being organised in his memory the actual setlist contains only 4 real Mercury-composed songs. Even if Freddy suddenly returned from the dead I really doubt we'd be seeing tracks like Somebody To Love in the setlist - so let's not even start about stuff like Great King Rat, Liar or Ogre Battle. |
marcenciels 31.05.2009 11:04 |
""so let's not even start about stuff like Great King Rat, Liar or Ogre Battle."" those songs are low on my wish list ;) anyway...time will tell... i dont think i need to post the same cassette ;) my opinion is as good as any other on the subject. it's all speculations...héhéhé... |
Daniel Nester 31.05.2009 12:29 |
I think there is a large difference between joining Queen, working with Queen, and working with Queen +, i.e., Brian and Roger and Spike and Co. I think we are talking about that last one. And I don't really have an issue with it. |
theCro 01.06.2009 00:00 |
***** its NOT FREDDY but FREDDIE for GOD'S SAKE! and another thing, someone said right thing - can he write, can he play any instruments??? just remember PAUL who could sing and write amazing songs for all his long career. this guy can't write songs classy songs for Queen, or he can, is he a miracle who can join Queen and Freddie will be forgotten because of him. COME ONE GUYS THIS GUY SURELY CANT WRITE AS CLOSE AS FIRST DOT OF F letter from FREDDIE WORD. one micromillimeter .... he cant compete with Freddie nor Paul, all Brian and Roger can do is write for him and he will sing. i want Brian and Roger to rock again as Queen, i really do... but i think they will ruing their reputation if they choose this INSTANT Tv star... i mean, FREDDIE, THEN PAUL and THEN Lambert???? WHO THE F*** IS LAMBERT??? [listu] [li]PAUL PLEASE COME BACK !!!!!!!!!!!! [img=/images/smiley/msn/cry_smile.gif][/img] [/listu] |
Yara 01.06.2009 00:19 |
Hi, Thomas Tønnesen! How are you? Wow, what a nice and well-written and thought out post. :-)) It was really great to read it. I agree with you on the lad's skills - he sings well, and I always think that gifted people may improve over time under the right circumstances. Believe it or not, I'm not very optimistic about Roger and Brian, though. It hurts me to say this, but ever since Freddie died, Roger and Brian, by themselves, haven't amount to anything. I hate to say this and to think like that, but I say to myself: "It's been almost 18 - 18! - years ever since Freddie died and their relevance to music has been close to zero". It's been 18 years. I am 18 year-old - when I think about it, I mean...I'd never have heard about them if it were not for Queen and, mainly, Freddie, who after his death, as everyone tells me, became this myth and legendary figure. I was born about the same time Freddie died and I grew up without Brian May and Roger Taylor in my music horizont: I've always listened to a LOT OF MUSIC but their appeal must have been so insignificant that I had always assumed they had just retired after Queen disbanded. Arg, I don't like saying this, it sounds ugly, but it's how I feel, I feel as if the musical landscape, so to speak, would have remained almost the same had these two great musicians not done anything in music. "No One But You" has been the only redeeming moment perhaps - one song in 18 years, and even this song is a kind of hommage to Freddie and featured John Deacon! I'll stop it now because I don't like thinking this way. But it's been too much time for me to expect anything more from them, really - I just hope they're happy in whatever they do and I wish them the very best. If eventually a great album comes, I'd be thrilled and, as a fan, quite proud!, but I feel it's not happening. To me this has much more to do with Brian and Roger than with the Adam Lambert. I loved your post, though. I would like to have written it myself - it's well-argued and written and I'd love to express the same feelings as you, really. I think I'm envious. :op Take care and congratulations for the great post! Yara |
mike hunt 01.06.2009 03:30 |
Yara wrote: Hi, Thomas Tønnesen! How are you? Wow, what a nice and well-written and thought out post. :-)) It was really great to read it. I agree with you on the lad's skills - he sings well, and I always think that gifted people may improve over time under the right circumstances. Believe it or not, I'm not very optimistic about Roger and Brian, though. It hurts me to say this, but ever since Freddie died, Roger and Brian, by themselves, haven't amount to anything. I hate to say this and to think like that, but I say to myself: "It's been almost 18 - 18! - years ever since Freddie died and their relevance to music has been close to zero". It's been 18 years. I am 18 year-old - when I think about it, I mean...I'd never have heard about them if it were not for Queen and, mainly, Freddie, who after his death, as everyone tells me, became this myth and legendary figure. I was born about the same time Freddie died and I grew up without Brian May and Roger Taylor in my music horizont: I've always listened to a LOT OF MUSIC but their appeal must have been so insignificant that I had always assumed they had just retired after Queen disbanded. Arg, I don't like saying this, it sounds ugly, but it's how I feel, I feel as if the musical landscape, so to speak, would have remained almost the same had these two great musicians not done anything in music. "No One But You" has been the only redeeming moment perhaps - one song in 18 years, and even this song is a kind of hommage to Freddie and featured John Deacon! I'll stop it now because I don't like thinking this way. But it's been too much time for me to expect anything more from them, really - I just hope they're happy in whatever they do and I wish them the very best. If eventually a great album comes, I'd be thrilled and, as a fan, quite proud!, but I feel it's not happening. To me this has much more to do with Brian and Roger than with the Adam Lambert. I loved your post, though. I would like to have written it myself - it's well-argued and written and I'd love to express the same feelings as you, really. I think I'm envious. :op Take care and congratulations for the great post! Yara great post and very very true. some queenzoners don't want to admit that queen have been Insignificant since freddie died, if they admit that than they sound like freddie stefords. i'm a fan of all four members of this band (roger the least) but the facts are the facts. Queen are a mess without freddie. Some Don't want to admit that. |
brians wig 01.06.2009 04:11 |
Having only seen the two American Idol finalists performing WATC and nothing else, I don't know what the fuss is. They're both sound like a pair of karaoke singers. |
Borhap80 01.06.2009 09:03 |
Sometimes it’s easy to get carried away. Some say I did with my post ;) It was meant that way. The post still stands. I do think it’s possible to create new music which will be far more interesting and fulfilling than The Cosmos Rocks. And I also do think that Lambert will be able to pull it off. But how likely is it? I agree that it might be too far-fetched and too much to expect, and maybe impossible. Maybe they have dried out creatively? And as for Lamberts writing abilities, I wouldn’t know. But you never now what they could create as unit. With an instrument that Lambert’s got, maybe that will even push Brian and Roger further as writers. This is just pure speculation and me ranting. And as for Queen being a non-productive and non-creative unit for almost 20 years – I see your point. They have been productive in a way that has kept Queen in the picture; they have produced and created “We Will Rock You” – the musical, played live with a number of artists, released albums and DVDs, recorded songs and albums and so on. Many people will indeed attack me for my next argument; I think that Roger and Brian’s work with keeping and preserving Queen in today’s music business has bared its fruits; Many films have included their music, references to the band et.c, and both famous and unknown artists have recorded and performed their songs, mentioned their influence in all kinds of ways, from showmanship, creative writing and musical performance. Has it been worth it? Or has the Queen legacy been destroyed by these years of collaborations, releases and new products in whatever way? Although some of them has been quite embarrassing – it has managed to keep Queen in the business in many ways. I do agree that the creative output, “songwriting wise” has been non-revolutionary, and in fact to some degree not relevant. “No One But You” is a beautiful song, with meaning and substance – but that is it. All the 46664 stuff sounds to me dull and too ambitious. And as for the Cosmos Rock – even though I like the album, I find it quite boring and uninspiring. So, yes I do understand that some find Queen insignificant since Freddie died in terms of recordings. But that doesn’t mean they still can’t pull it of with the right person, in the right environment. And for those who think Lambert is a karaoke singer - get a life! |
Pim Derks 01.06.2009 09:49 |
Yara wrote: Believe it or not, I'm not very optimistic about Roger and Brian, though. It hurts me to say this, but ever since Freddie died, Roger and Brian, by themselves, haven't amount to anything. I hate to say this and to think like that, but I say to myself: "It's been almost 18 - 18! - years ever since Freddie died and their relevance to music has been close to zero". Anyone who's been in a band like Queen has that problem. I can't remember the last time a member of a HUGE 60's/70's/80's band has actually created new music which overshadowed his/her former band. The only exception I can think of is Michael Jackson. Besides that - any band who has had their peak in the 60's/70's or 80's will never reach that height again. Look at the Stones, the Who, McCartney, Queen - anyone from that era still 'active' today. Sure, McCartney made some great stuff with Wings and solo. The last Who-album was a whole lot better than most people were expecting and apparently the last Stones album was also really good - but those acts will ALWAYS be remembered for Hey Jude, Paint It Black and My Generation. Same with Queen - they will always be remembered for WWRY (the song, not the musical) and BoRhap. For me it's not about expecting a new Bohemian Rhapsody which sells millions and hits number 1 all over the world. It's about seeing my favorite musicians in the world enjoy making music together - be it live or a new studio record. ALL of the Queen-related releases had at least a couple of interesting tunes - and that's always better than NOTHING at all, like it was from 1998 up until 2008. The sheer thrill of finally getting some REAL new Queen-related music is something that I hope hasn't happened for the last time in 2008. I have to agree though with your comment about No-One But You. For me too, that was the last song that had the real Queen magic. Maybe it wasn't Freddy who added the secret ingredient, but John? ;-) |
Pim Derks 01.06.2009 09:56 |
Thomas Tønnesen wrote: I do agree that the creative output, “songwriting wise” has been non-revolutionary, and in fact to some degree not relevant. “No One But You” is a beautiful song, with meaning and substance – but that is it. All the 46664 stuff sounds to me dull and too ambitious. And as for the Cosmos Rock – even though I like the album, I find it quite boring and uninspiring. So, yes I do understand that some find Queen insignificant since Freddie died in terms of recordings. But that doesn’t mean they still can’t pull it of with the right person, in the right environment. Agreed about the 46664 stuff. Especially Invincible Hope sounds like "Roger-Taylor-by-numbers" - a nice track, but nothing really great. Can't agree about Cosmos Rocks though - songs like Small and Cosmos Rocking show a (for me at least) new side of Roger's songwriting. I think it's great that Roger has renewed his "love" for music in the last couple of years. If people had asked me 5 years ago who'd call it quits the soonest - Brian or Roger - I'd have said Roger without a doubt. After Electric Fire in 1998 up until 2005 Roger barely touched a drumkit I think - except for the occassional promo-performance - and boy did it show. But nowadays it seems that Brian is more and more busy with other types of projects. I find it hard to believe that Brian only contributed three tracks to the Cosmos Rocks album, where in the past he was the most profilic writer in the band. But if the only thing he can come up with these days is Still Burning maybe it's better this way ;-) |
Amazon 01.06.2009 10:52 |
Pim Derks wrote: I have to agree though with your comment about No-One But You. For me too, that was the last song that had the real Queen magic. Maybe it wasn't Freddy who added the secret ingredient, but John? ;-) I think John certianly played a major part. I don't want to get off topic into yet another 'is Queen still Queen without Freddie' discussion, but I think that the combination of Brian, Roger and John can still perform magic. If John came back, not just as a bass player but also as a song-writer, I would be much more accepting of whatever they chose to do. |
Borhap80 01.06.2009 11:06 |
I also think that John played an integral and important part in the Queen sound, as No One But You shows. The bass playing in "The Cosmos Rocks" doesn't do anything for me. It is uninspiring, not very creative and it feels like an instrument just put in for having a basssegment in the production. This lets down the album for me. We will probably never get John back to lay some basslines, but that isn't very suprising... As for Roger's playing and songwriting - He plays excellent and it reminds me of his 70's period. Superb. His songwriting is ok. The Cosmos Rockin is an unoriginal, Status Quo meets Slade composition. Not very impressed. Small is a nice tune, but not that great. |
Sheer Brass Neck 01.06.2009 17:34 |
Agree with all of the last posts. Everyone in life has a time and place, and for the aforementioned bands, it would be virtually impossible to break through to kids (rock is a young man's game) at age 60 the way they did for me when I heard ANATO for the first time, or saw them live. They don't ahve the same energy, and why would they, that they did when they were young men trying to make their mark. Human nature is human nature, and they can't be as hungry as they were in the 70s, and that is reflected in lesser albums and less energetic concerts. As for Adam Lambert, my only question is why? After running as far as possible from a Freddie like singer, to gravitate towards some one who is effeminate, probably closeted gay, dramatic and with a great voice (but no discernible writing skills or ability to hold an audience's attention in anything but a TV studio) is only going to bring derision and comparisons to Queen. If they need a singer, Billy Squier is a contemporary, a great writer who still sings and has written some great songs on his last acoustic album. I'd be infinitely more enthused if they went to a musician with a track record who would than Adam Lambert. |
Makka 01.06.2009 21:27 |
It's not just about the singing. It's also about the songwriting. Brian and Roger can't write songs like Freddie did which was a major part of the band. For me, Queen ended with the death of Freddie. RIP! |
Yara 01.06.2009 22:02 |
Thomas Tønnesen wrote:
And as for Queen being a non-productive and non-creative unit for almost 20 years – I see your point. They have been productive in a way that has kept Queen in the picture; they have produced and created “We Will Rock You” – the musical, played live with a number of artists, released albums and DVDs, recorded songs and albums and so on. Many people will indeed attack me for my next argument;
I think that Roger and Brian’s work with keeping and preserving Queen in today’s music business has bared its fruits; Many films have included their music, references to the band et.c, and both famous and unknown artists have recorded and performed their songs, mentioned their influence in all kinds of ways, from showmanship, creative writing and musical performance. Has it been worth it? Or has the Queen legacy been destroyed by these years of collaborations, releases and new products in whatever way? Although some of them has been quite embarrassing – it has managed to keep Queen in the business in many ways.
Hi, Thomas! How are you? Well, great reply. I just think that Brian and Roger could have done all that - that is, promoting Queen and keeping the band legacy alive - while working on new stuff! What prevented them from doing it? My guess is: maybe lack of inspiration? I'm almost resenting having written that post, it's not fair, it's harsh, but it's how I feel, I like the guys so much, but I have to be honest to myself: their record with regard to new material is just absolutely insignificant - one song in 18 years? And a song paying tribute to Freddie, in a certain way, and featuring John Deacon. :op I have to stop this. It all boils down to the fact that The Cosmos Rock was a huge frustration to me - it was bound to be a great album: Paul Rodgers, Roger Taylor, Brian May...and the output was a trivial predictable and even at times outright mediocre, to my humble taste. Mind people, this is ONLY my very personal taste, and I appreciate a lot the fact that there are many people who do enjoy Brian's and Roger's solo works and the Cosmos Rock. It's great, I respect that a lot, I loved to see the guys live, but my feeling is that...it hurts me to say, but I look at them and listen to them talking and listen to the music and it's as if they were ambassadors to Queen, always being forced to look backwards for lack of clue about how going forward. Oh, my. This is really sad, but it's how I feel. I'd love, I'd be just thrilled, if the guys came out with not a GREAT GREAT album, no!, but with a good, decent release which at least made justice to their talent and to what it's expected from such great musicians. I'd be proud of them. But I just got this feeling that it's not going to happen. And your thread is so exciting, Thomas, and the way you write is engaging. I really wanted to be able to express the feelings you have. Take care and have a wonderful day! Yara |
Yara 01.06.2009 22:15 |
Pim Derks wrote:Yara wrote: Believe it or not, I'm not very optimistic about Roger and Brian, though. It hurts me to say this, but ever since Freddie died, Roger and Brian, by themselves, haven't amount to anything. I hate to say this and to think like that, but I say to myself: "It's been almost 18 - 18! - years ever since Freddie died and their relevance to music has been close to zero".Anyone who's been in a band like Queen has that problem. I can't remember the last time a member of a HUGE 60's/70's/80's band has actually created new music which overshadowed his/her former band. The only exception I can think of is Michael Jackson. Besides that - any band who has had their peak in the 60's/70's or 80's will never reach that height again. Look at the Stones, the Who, McCartney, Queen - anyone from that era still 'active' today. Sure, McCartney made some great stuff with Wings and solo. The last Who-album was a whole lot better than most people were expecting and apparently the last Stones album was also really good - but those acts will ALWAYS be remembered for Hey Jude, Paint It Black and My Generation. Same with Queen - they will always be remembered for WWRY (the song, not the musical) and BoRhap. For me it's not about expecting a new Bohemian Rhapsody which sells millions and hits number 1 all over the world. It's about seeing my favorite musicians in the world enjoy making music together - be it live or a new studio record. ALL of the Queen-related releases had at least a couple of interesting tunes - and that's always better than NOTHING at all, like it was from 1998 up until 2008. The sheer thrill of finally getting some REAL new Queen-related music is something that I hope hasn't happened for the last time in 2008. I have to agree though with your comment about No-One But You. For me too, that was the last song that had the real Queen magic. Maybe it wasn't Freddy who added the secret ingredient, but John? ;-) Hi, Pim Derks! How are you? I shouldn't have written that, sometimes it's better to keep some feeling to ourselves, I don't like talking like that about the guys, but it's the way I feel, and whenever you bring these examples, I get even more disappointed - because even though Lennon and Harrisson, by no means, overshadowed the Beatles, they had an absolutely brilliant solo career which proved they continued to be amazing musicians - Harrisson's "All Things Must Pass" is a masterpiece and Lennon's solo work is a gift. So the Beatles disbanded, you'd think that the guys would sink, but they went on to make albums which changed the history of popular music AGAIN!!! I can't see this musicianship in Brian and Roger anymore. I just can't. It's been 18 years. I have enjoyed a single song, and even this song features John Deacon and has this ever-haunting ghost of Freddie around it. Are they talented? No doubt. They're brilliant. I myself don't have an explanation for that. Maybe they matched too well and Freddie was such an important part of Brian's and Roger's musicianship that after he passed away they couldn't find themselves anymore because their musical identity had partially been defined by a person who wasn't there anymore. Maybe Freddie's death was too much of a blow, I don't know. I do agree with you, absolutely, that it's time for giving up on higher hopes - it's not about expecting Anato II, but a good, consistent album which lives up to the great musicians they are. Because, in the end of the day, they're fading away in the horizont as Freddie grows bigger and bigger over time. I wish them both the very best, be it doing music or something else. I'm a fan! And I'd just love to listen to a good material from them. Anyway, the thread is just absolutely great and wanna thank you, Pim Derks, Thomas and all those who're taking part in it. Have a great day! Yara |
mike hunt 02.06.2009 02:06 |
Makka wrote: It's not just about the singing. It's also about the songwriting. Brian and Roger can't write songs like Freddie did which was a major part of the band. For me, Queen ended with the death of Freddie. RIP! ok, this is the part that the brian and roger stefords start calling you a freddie only guy, or a freddie steford, but why?...For telling the truth?.. that's why. John was a very important member of queen, that's for sure, but he wasn't the main ingrediant. The main ingrediants of queen are Freddie's voice/songwriting and brians guitar/songwriting. Take one of those 2 out of the equation, and the queen sound is no more. End of story!....especially freddie, he was the most original and creative member. |
john bodega 02.06.2009 13:45 |
That's literally bullshit. "Save Me" is as much a Queen song as anything Freddie wrote ... honestly, there must be something in the water at this forum. Even when it comes from the horses mouth that Queen was a 4-way collaboration, people still insist that one member must have been more crucial than the other. And please, no one cite "The Cosmos Rocks" as an example. That's not a case of "Freddie's gone so we suck now". That's a case of "We're old and comfortable". Probably would've happened even if Freddie was alive. |
Amazon 02.06.2009 14:00 |
Zebonka12 wrote: And please, no one cite "The Cosmos Rocks" as an example. That's not a case of "Freddie's gone so we suck now". That's a case of "We're old and comfortable". Probably would've happened even if Freddie was alive. I don't agree with that. I think it's a case of "Freddie's dead and John's retired, and we got someone in to replace Freddie who's just nowhere near as good and we have nobody to replace John." I don't think that Queen died when Freddie died, but I do think that Queen died when John left the group. Regardles of how important Freddie was, John was also extremely important and I don't think that Queen can survive with 50% of its members gone, and nor should it IMO. "No-One But You" was the perfect way to end Queen. Following it, I think that Brian and Roger should either have embarked upon solo careers, or they should have named their project with Rodgers something other than Queen. |
john bodega 02.06.2009 14:40 |
Ha! Well put.. I might be imagining things but there were manifest and very palpable moments on "The Cosmos Rocks" where Deacon's absent was glaringly obvious. I think as far as replacements go there's better and there's worse than Paul Rodgers.. I've always wondered why the felt the need to even have one. People can say what they want about Brian May as a singer but there's only a couple of tracks on the new album that match "No One But You" as far as sounding impassioned goes; "Say It's Not True" and "C-Lebrity". On the rest of the tracks Rodgers just sounds like he's coasting. |
Holly2003 02.06.2009 15:17 |
With Brian's ego as huge as it is these days, I suppose we're lucky he didn't play bass and drums on TCR. |
Amazon 02.06.2009 15:59 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Ha! Well put.. I might be imagining things but there were manifest and very palpable moments on "The Cosmos Rocks" where Deacon's absent was glaringly obvious. I think as far as replacements go there's better and there's worse than Paul Rodgers.. I've always wondered why the felt the need to even have one. People can say what they want about Brian May as a singer but there's only a couple of tracks on the new album that match "No One But You" as far as sounding impassioned goes; "Say It's Not True" and "C-Lebrity". On the rest of the tracks Rodgers just sounds like he's coasting. So true. Brian is IMO a terrific singer, and I would have loved an album with him, Roger and John in which he (and Roger to a lesser extent) sang. The problem is, however, it mightn't have done so well commercially. I mean, yes, TCR wasn't a success, but would a Queen album without Freddie and with Brian (and Roger) singing lead have done better? I doubt it, although I think it would have been one hell of an album! [img=/images/smiley/msn/teeth_smile.gif][/img] |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 02.06.2009 17:28 |
Hey, guys. I want to add my 2 cents. I think everything they have ever done, be it as Queen, Queen+ or solo, has beautiful moments and I love it all. Take "Soul Brother", for example. I hate it, but the solo gives me the thrills. "Delilah" is deep sh*t, but the solo saves it again. "Fun It" is really bad, but some of Roger's vocals in there are brilliant. This is a matter of taste, of course, but I cannot find a single solo or Queen, or even Queen+ release irrelevant. I must be just a freak fan, but that's how I feel :) Roger's and Brian's solo works have really magic moments and I think they outdo most of Freddie's solo efforts, even if I like them a lot too. Well, what I really wanted to say with these random examples of my feelings towards what you have been discussing is that most of it is a matter of taste. Not all of it, but most of it, I dare to say. So, there you have it: a sample of my personal taste to add to this very interesting discussion. Cheers, Ogre-, the freak fan |
doxonrox 02.06.2009 19:31 |
Holly2003 wrote: With Brian's ego as huge as it is these days, I suppose we're lucky he didn't play bass and drums on TCR. Sarcasm? Because he did play some bass.... |
mike hunt 03.06.2009 02:47 |
mike hunt wrote:Makka wrote: It's not just about the singing. It's also about the songwriting. Brian and Roger can't write songs like Freddie did which was a major part of the band. For me, Queen ended with the death of Freddie. RIP!ok, this is the part that the brian and roger stefords start calling you a freddie only guy, or a freddie steford, but why?...For telling the truth?.. that's why. John was a very important member of queen, that's for sure, but he wasn't the main ingrediant. The main ingrediants of queen are Freddie's voice/songwriting and brians guitar/songwriting. Take one of those 2 out of the equation, and the queen sound is no more. End of story!....especially freddie, he was the most original and creative member. i'm not sure if your referring to me, but I did say if you take freddie or brian out of the band the queen sound is no more. yes, john was Important, but their was many bass players Just as good who they could have hired to play on TCR. If I'm not mistaken Innuendo was an album that John didn't even write one song. The band could have survived without him, though he was important. They were all important, but not equally like some try to say. Even freddie said they help each other. |
Future Manager 04.06.2009 21:27 |
Although I enjoyed Queen + Paul Rodgers very much, I agree with the sentiment that 1997, with No One But You and the Show Must Go On performance with Elton in Paris, was a perfect oppurtunity for the Queen brand (as an active performing band) to end. However I do think that Brian and Roger are still capable of magic, because in my opinion a song like Small has everything that Queen was about (why no single, argh!). |
marcenciels 04.06.2009 23:54 |
with all that has been said.... i'm happy to be in my shoes ;) ego or not...it's not simple to be what's left of Queen. they all needed each other. i'm a little little pissed at john, to have quit. ( cause Freddie used to demand his input, to be full part of the band) but i understand him to a certain limit. my feeling is...if he was still there, the magic could have lived longer. in the end and ever all...Queen will always be unique ! if lambert can fuel new fire in Brain and Roger, even for just one Lp. that would be great ! yes ? |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 05.06.2009 11:03 |
Marcenciel, I understand your point, but please don't be pissed at John. It's his life, anyway. Besides, what if he is facing some big problem that does not leave room for him to play with the guys again? Let us just be thankful for ALL he gave us. Cheers, Ogre- |
marcenciels 05.06.2009 16:12 |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira wrote: Marcenciel, I understand your point, but please don't be pissed at John. It's his life, anyway. Besides, what if he is facing some big problem that does not leave room for him to play with the guys again? Let us just be thankful for ALL he gave us. Cheers, Ogre- hi Ogre :) i meant i use to be...and pissed was the first word that came to me whilte writing my thought's. i would be right of me to say : dissapointed. as you say, who knows how his life is going at the moment. i wish all is pretty well for john and his love one's. re-Cheers ! Marc :) |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 05.06.2009 16:58 |
marcenciels wrote:Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira wrote: Marcenciel, I understand your point, but please don't be pissed at John. It's his life, anyway. Besides, what if he is facing some big problem that does not leave room for him to play with the guys again? Let us just be thankful for ALL he gave us. Cheers, Ogre-hi Ogre :) i meant i use to be...and pissed was the first word that came to me whilte writing my thought's. i would be right of me to say : dissapointed. as you say, who knows how his life is going at the moment. i wish all is pretty well for john and his love one's. re-Cheers ! Marc :) Hey, Marcenciels! :) I am very happy to hear that. Sorry that I misunderstood you. re-re-Cheers! :D |
cacatua 07.06.2009 00:52 |
Thomas, I AGREE with you! And the rest of you: Don't sell Adam Lambert short! Sure, he's young at 26, but has been in theater and honing his voice since he was 10 years old. It just comes out effortlessly, and he is totally confident and comfortable on stage and not at all afraid to improvise and "go for it". Yes, he is gay, for those who seem to think that is important for one reason or another. He has always been open about it, and is comfortable in his own skin, though he and his mother had to sign a contract to not talk about it while he was on the Idol show. He has done some song writing, though I can't honestly say what he might have in him on that front. But he also has the charisma that is necessary for one to be an exciting performer and I can't help but think that he and "what's left of Queen" might just be good for each other. I certainly would like to see them at least talk about it. As I have said in another related thread here, when he appeared with Queen on the Idol finale the hair stood up on the back of my neck, and that hasn't happened since seeing Freddie perform. |
Sheer Brass Neck 07.06.2009 10:32 |
That's fine Cacatua, but if he does perform with Queen, who is Queen? If Brian falls ill for a while and can't tour, is Queen then Roger Taylor, Adam Lambert, Spike Edney, Jamie Moses, Danny Miranda and whoever takes Brian's spot on guitar? If Eric Clapton, Eddie Van Halen, Wendy from Prince's bad join Queen, when doe sit stop being Queen? |
Borhap80 07.06.2009 13:33 |
Roger Taylor and John Deacon played under the Queen banner in 1993, at Cowdray park. They performed "Kind of Magic", "I Want to Break Free", "Radio Ga Ga", "We Will Rock You" and "These Are the Days of Our Lives". I would guess that at least two of the original members would appear, for putting it under the Queen banner. If Brian or Roger by chance had got ill before a tour, they would have postponed the gigs. I also got goosebumps when they performed with Lambert. |
cacatua 07.06.2009 14:29 |
Sheer Brass Neck I'm not here to theorize on the viability of every possible equation of the essence of Queen. I'm here to say that Adam has the charisma and the talent to bring something to the table that has been lacking since Freddie's unfortunate loss. To say that Adam could replace Freddie would be ridiculous, but does he have the right sort of chemistry with them to make something sort of magical happen again - to perhaps make Queen back into a unit instead of something like the headless horseman or a puzzle with a big piece missing? What sort of song-writing ability might he have? The only performance that I know of that is out there on You Tube that I have been told is his song is "Crawl Through Fire". The best word I can think of for that performance is hedonistic. But I have seen Adam turn something around and do it an entirely different way from what you'd expect to fit in a different situation. He seems to be able to think creatively outside the box. I did happen to think it was a sort of magical meeting when Adam performed, however briefly with Queen on Idol. It was totally unexpected, and yes, Thomas the hair did come up on the back of my neck - I'm so glad that you had that experience too. In fact it still gets me going when I go replay the video online. But it is just a tease. Well, we don't always get what we want, but I do hope that Queen and Adam explore the possibility at some point. I thought that I saw something in the way that Adam was interacting with Brian and the expression on Roger's face at one point, but maybe I was just seeing what I wanted to see. |
cacatua 07.06.2009 15:31 |
I just wanted to add that I have a great deal of empathy for Brian, Roger and John. I've lost people who were close, and it is very difficult to find a way to pick up and go on. With a group like that it must be like having a limb amputated. I have to give Brian and Roger credit for trying to find a way, and wonder if there are any circumstances under which John would come back out and play. |
Borhap80 08.08.2009 15:36 |
Is something happening here?? This is mentioned on Queenonline.com: Lambert Talks More Queen 07/08/09 Adam Lambert has said that performing with the remaining members of Queen again would be an honour. “Queen is one of my all-time favourite bands,” he told the Baltimore Sun. “Freddie Mercury was a huge influence on me musically.” The whole article is here: link And this is mentioned on Queen's Facebook page: "2009 is going to keep up its’ hectic pace for Queen with a number of releases, alliances and re-issues. Make sure to check back regularly for updates because there’s going to be new stuff nearly every week –" What is meant by alliances? And why does Queenonline mention the article about Lambert? This is just pure speculation but you never now... |