Rich Tea 22.05.2009 15:57 |
I would just like to balance things out a little because it seems to me the anti Q+PR crew do not reflect the opinion of the 10,000's of people I saw at the shows I was at and my own personnal opinions!! THANKS Paul for joining up with Brian & Roger to give us 2 amazing tours and a grossly under rated but excellent Album. btw Small is one of my favourite Queen Songs Ever!!! I saw a few gigs and the whole band and show blew me away. My first Queen show was 31 years ago so I'm not a fan who never saw Freddie but I am a fan who accepts that he is sadly departed. I can fully understand why you were an influence to Mr Mercury you are a unique and superb performer. I hope to see you perform again with Queen but in the mean time good luck with Bad Company and if you tour the UK I will be there being a late introductee to your music pre Q+PR. As for Queen I'm looking forward to Rogers new solo album and maybe a solo tour, I really hope despite their age/wealth and some of the tits who post on here they continue to provide me with the soundtrack of my life well into my old age!! Thank You Guys!!! |
onevsion 22.05.2009 16:02 |
Thanks indeed. It's been 5 fantastic years! |
e-man 22.05.2009 17:31 |
amen thankyou paul. you are amazing |
L-R-TIGER1994 22.05.2009 18:04 |
Small is not a Queen song,it's a song by Brian Roger and Paul. |
Rich Tea 22.05.2009 18:32 |
funny but I have aways considered Brian & Roger to be Queen and if they wanted to call themselves Megaqueengods thats cool by me you talentless berk if they say its Queen its f ucking Queen remember they have devoted a lifetime to this!!! Btw please read the post and put your brain into gear before replying lol TIT lol I think you have reinforced the argument rather than detracted from it like you intended. Please understand as distressing as it may be Freddie died in 1991 an John retired in 1997 so Queen is Brian & Roger OK Respect.............................. |
redspecialusa 22.05.2009 19:20 |
I couldn't have said it any better than the originator of the post did. THANK YOU PAUL! GOD BLESS YA!!! Because of you Paul, I got to see Brian (my hero on guitar) & Roger live. It was a joy and pleasure to hear your interpretations of Queens' back catalog. |
L-R-TIGER1994 22.05.2009 20:45 |
Rich Tea wrote: funny but I have aways considered Brian & Roger to be Queen and if they wanted to call themselves Megaqueengods thats cool by me you talentless berk if they say its Queen its f ucking Queen remember they have devoted a lifetime to this!!! Btw please read the post and put your brain into gear before replying lol TIT lol I think you have reinforced the argument rather than detracted from it like you intended. Please understand as distressing as it may be Freddie died in 1991 an John retired in 1997 so Queen is Brian & Roger OK Respect.............................. They can call the band whatever they want but Small is NOT a Queen song!!!!as TCR is NOT a Queen Album!!!. |
argQ 22.05.2009 20:59 |
Dear Paul, take your time, do your stuff, enjoy yourself and come back to Q+PR project. We are waiting for you!!!!! Nobody else can do it. You are the best vocalist arronund. |
Knute 22.05.2009 23:26 |
Thanks Paul! I'm confident that as time goes on the integrity of the collaboration between you and Bri and Rog will shine brighter with each American Idol wannabee they try and work with. The two Q+PR gigs I saw were honestly two of the best I have even seen. You won't soon be forgotten in my mind. You epitomize the highest standard in rock music excellence. I really do hope to see you on stage with Bri and Rog sometime again in the future. Thanks again! |
L-R-TIGER1994 22.05.2009 23:32 |
Knute wrote:
You epitomize the highest standard in rock music excellence.
You are exagerating a little I think. |
Knute 22.05.2009 23:46 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: Knute wrote: You epitomize the highest standard in rock music excellence. You are exagerating a little I think. Go fuck yourself dude |
L-R-TIGER1994 22.05.2009 23:48 |
"The Voice" was Frank Sinatra,Paul is just....is just...who cares...this is a Queen forum. |
Rich Tea 23.05.2009 03:44 |
L-R-TIGER1994 why do you want to flame a post that you clearly have no interest in? This is for those who appreciated what PR has done and obviously have the complete opposite opinion to you. Does it frustrate you? We could argue all day about the validity of the Queen name but it isn't ours to argue about as far as I am concerned anything involving Brian & Roger IS QUEEN and Paul has made a very valid contribution to the Queen legacy as far as I'm concerned. Its sad that you feel the need to vandalise but a sign of your clear inadequacy |
GT 23.05.2009 04:09 |
Well said Rich Tea, I agree with everything you initially said. A great singer and a welcome addition to what is now known as Queen. It's funny because this little adventure has lasted longer than most new groups do in their lifetime......not just now but throughout the last few decades. Good luck Paul hope you work with BM and RT again in the future. |
ANAGRAMER 23.05.2009 04:19 |
Indeed, well done Paul Rodgers - it takes a brave man to step into Queen and face the criticism and inevitable comparison with Freddie Mercury The questions we have to ask is: Would you rather it hadn't happened? Which singer would have done it better? You can't place all the blame, or give all the credit to Paul for the Cosmos Rocks album. I think, in retrospect, a little more work on the lyrics and production would have made it a worthy addition to the Queen catalogue but time passes and who knows what Queen may have produced had Freddie still been around to be involved I, for one, am sad to see this project come to an end and look forward to another collaboration |
YourValentine 23.05.2009 04:21 |
I agree, Rich Tea. I am also one of the many thousands who could not believe their luck when QPR went on tour in 2005. Who would have expected that almost 20 years after the Magic tour? I am sad that it ended but it was more than I ever expected before December 2004 when Roger announced the tour on TV. It was a great time and I enjoyed the Paul Rodgers songs, too. |
dsmeer 23.05.2009 05:41 |
I went to 2 Q+PR gigs, I thought they were doing great. The first time I went with no expectations, just to see Brain and Roger, but they rocked. Let's face it Freddie was the best, but he is not among us any more, let the people that like the Q+PR thing be happy with it and the others do not have to go. So here goes: Thank you, merci, danke, bedankt Paul. And please do 1 more tour with Brian and Roger. |
queenside 23.05.2009 06:06 |
thank you paul for giving us fans the chance to see brian and roger live, even without freddie and john they are still pure magic! thank you for having such strong personality when a lot of people saw you as replacement of freddie but i never saw you like that, no one can replace irreplacable. i saw you as guest vocalist to a lot of queen songs ("+" in Q+PR name indicates that) and you've preformed them with passion and very uniquely in your own style. it was celebration of great music by queen, free and bad company and those bands made some of the best songs ever! saw QPR live 3 times and i was blown away every single time. thank you paul! |
on my way up 23.05.2009 06:22 |
Many QZ-members are young people. For us these tours were fantastic. To see Brian and Roger together live was for me a dream come true. I'm glad they chose Paul Rodgers. I didn't really know his work but I knew he has a great voice. I saw the 2 Antwerp shows, 1 in 2005 and 1 in 2008. I enjoyed both very much. |
e-man 23.05.2009 08:07 |
Knute wrote:
Thanks Paul!
I'm confident that as time goes on the integrity of the collaboration between you and Bri and Rog will shine brighter with each American Idol wannabee they try and work with.
The two Q+PR gigs I saw were honestly two of the best I have even seen.
You won't soon be forgotten in my mind.
You epitomize the highest standard in rock music excellence.
I really do hope to see you on stage with Bri and Rog sometime again in the future.
Thanks again!
the best post I've read in ages. second that Knute - apart from the fact that I saw 4 gigs :) |
pg 23.05.2009 08:20 |
Take LOVE...... ..LOVE... ..LOVE... ..LOVE.... ..LOVE... ..LOVE .... ..LOVE... it's time to shine G. :-))) |
marcenciels 23.05.2009 09:52 |
apart for a few songs, i dont like the TCR album that much. but i am very happy that Paul was there to get Roger and Brian back as Queen, live ! and that was great ! |
queenfanbg 23.05.2009 10:19 |
Ducksoup wrote: Thanks indeed. It's been 5 fantastic years! Its been 5 wasted years for sure |
Canadian May Fan 23.05.2009 10:35 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote:Rich Tea wrote: funny but I have aways considered Brian & Roger to be Queen and if they wanted to call themselves Megaqueengods thats cool by me you talentless berk if they say its Queen its f ucking Queen remember they have devoted a lifetime to this!!! Btw please read the post and put your brain into gear before replying lol TIT lol I think you have reinforced the argument rather than detracted from it like you intended. Please understand as distressing as it may be Freddie died in 1991 an John retired in 1997 so Queen is Brian & Roger OK Respect..............................They can call the band whatever they want but Small is NOT a Queen song!!!!as TCR is NOT a Queen Album!!!. Get over yourself -- as you said, they can call the band and songs whatever they like. |
L-R-TIGER1994 23.05.2009 11:42 |
Canadian May Fan wrote:L-R-TIGER1994 wrote:Get over yourself -- as you said, they can call the band and songs whatever they like.Rich Tea wrote: funny but I have aways considered Brian & Roger to be Queen and if they wanted to call themselves Megaqueengods thats cool by me you talentless berk if they say its Queen its f ucking Queen remember they have devoted a lifetime to this!!! Btw please read the post and put your brain into gear before replying lol TIT lol I think you have reinforced the argument rather than detracted from it like you intended. Please understand as distressing as it may be Freddie died in 1991 an John retired in 1997 so Queen is Brian & Roger OK Respect..............................They can call the band whatever they want but Small is NOT a Queen song!!!!as TCR is NOT a Queen Album!!!. They can call the songs whatever they want....but they are not Queen songs. |
L-R-TIGER1994 23.05.2009 11:47 |
queenfanbg wrote:Ducksoup wrote: Thanks indeed. It's been 5 fantastic years!Its been 5 wasted years for sure fantastic years?it was fantastic that they gathered to make some shows so that young people had the opportunity to see them live again,fantastic years were from 1973 to 1986 |
The Real Wizard 23.05.2009 12:06 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: They can call the band whatever they want but Small is NOT a Queen song!!!!as TCR is NOT a Queen Album!!!. Who are you to define what Queen is or isn't? Last time I checked you aren't a founding member of the band. This is a thread for people to share their positive memories about the last few years. Pick another thread to spout your gibberish that clearly hasn't been said before by anyone else. |
L-R-TIGER1994 23.05.2009 12:11 |
QUEEN 2 BOOKLET:QUEEN ARE FREDDIE MERCURY,BRIAN MAY,ROGER TAYLOR,JOHN DEACON. I think you should know this,as you are the expert,can you call Paul McCartney and Ringo Star The Beatles?may be you can but tecnically is not Queen of course. |
L-R-TIGER1994 23.05.2009 12:13 |
Sir GH wrote:L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: They can call the band whatever they want but Small is NOT a Queen song!!!!as TCR is NOT a Queen Album!!!.Who are you to define what Queen is or isn't? Last time I checked you aren't a founding member of the band. This is a thread for people to share their positive memories about the last few years. Pick another thread to spout your gibberish that clearly hasn't been said before by anyone else. and you pick another person cos you are really a disgusting prick,are you tracking my posts to ALWAYS answer them??mind your business motherfucker... |
StoneColdClassicQueen 23.05.2009 13:06 |
Yes, thank you Chuck Norris. I gotta get my old sig back.... |
david (galashiels) 23.05.2009 13:16 |
it was good to see, queen or queen+,or whatever you want to call them for what was my kids first concert...i liked paul rodgers it,s a shame they seem to be finished...as a singer paul was or is good,to many critics shouted him down in certain forums.,maybe one day he will return to queen...dont forget when you had paul as a singer you also had a great collection of music, with an unknown singer ,you would not have had..so you had in theary one of the strongest rock tours of the year.it has been said before.if you dont like it dont buy it.me,i loved it.and would never had missed the chance to go and see them play again .at my age(50+)it was more than likley my last chance to see queen one last time.so good luck paul in whatever you do in the future,as for me.you can return to queen anytime. |
on my way up 23.05.2009 14:58 |
I'm really tired of the discussion about the name. I have my opinion about it but, as Bob indicated, this is not the thread to talk about that. In this topic, as made clear in the first post, we want to thank Paul (and also Queen of course) for what they gave us the last few years. I'm really glad I got to know Paul's music and voice better. It's stunning to see how fantastic he still sounds night after night. Enjoying his abilities doesn't make you a worse Queen-fan, you know. One of the things that I found great too was what they did with the Free/Bad Company songs. It was really great to hear those songs played by Roger and Brian. Even though it is of course not the Queen we all love there are still plenty of elements of that Queen we all love. Simply because Roger and Brian are half of that band and they still manage to get that typical Queen sound. Ok, it might not be complete because we all know 2 members are absent but it's more than we had the chance to enjoy in the period 1987-2004(FM tribute was a unique event). People should learn to enjoy what they have instead of going on and on and on about what they do not have. Thanks to Paul we had the chance to enjoy this wonderful journey. |
marcenciels 23.05.2009 15:04 |
call it what you want ! it is obvious that 2 different roots merged for a while. |
theCro 24.05.2009 01:00 |
never got a chanse in my life to see Queen live as i was one year old when they performed last gig... however, the Queen and Paul Rodgers tour's ... i wanted to go to see them but i havent got a chanse, they were not in my country... and i could not afford trip to another country by that time.. i really would like to see Queen live. howver back to topic, thanks to PAUL for doing this with QUEEN. Thank you for everything, thanks for amazing TCR studio album, thansk for being par of QUEEN! Paul have beautiful voice and he's amazing musician. I'm really sorry because this collaboration did not least longer... Paul good luck, and Queen good luck finding another established and succesfull singer! (please God, not this one from American IDOL!)!!!!!!! PAUL YOU ROCK! |
The Real Wizard 24.05.2009 02:35 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: QUEEN 2 BOOKLET:QUEEN ARE FREDDIE MERCURY,BRIAN MAY,ROGER TAYLOR,JOHN DEACON. I think you should know this,as you are the expert,can you call Paul McCartney and Ringo Star The Beatles?may be you can but tecnically is not Queen of course. Ringo wasn't a founding member of The Beatles, so I think that'd be a bit different from Brian and Roger, as they are the founding members of Queen. However, my opinion doesn't count, and I'm big enough to recognize that. If Ringo and Paul went out with Julian Lennon and Dhani Harrison and called it The Beatles, I'd respect them for doing what they want to do. It's their art, their legacy, and therefore it's ultimately their choice. Your argument is a poor one, because it assumes that a band can only have one lineup throughout their entire career. When did you become the constabulary of band dynamics, deciding that if a band doesn't change their name as members come and go, they must hang up their gloves and call it a day? Are you suggesting that Fragile isn't a Yes album, Heaven And Hell isn't a Black Sabbath album, and Stormbringer isn't a Deep Purple album? In that case, then technically, every Beatles album isn't a Beatles album because Pete Best was the original drummer. And of course, John Deacon was the fourth bass player in Queen, so I guess the debut album through Made In Heaven aren't Queen albums either. The bottom line is... we as fans do not define what the band is or isn't. They do, because it's their music. Stop hijacking this thread. It's a place for people to share their memories of Q+PR, not a place for you to spout your baseless opinions and childish name-calling. |
pittrek 24.05.2009 14:26 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: QUEEN 2 BOOKLET:QUEEN ARE FREDDIE MERCURY,BRIAN MAY,ROGER TAYLOR,JOHN DEACON. I think you should know this,as you are the expert,can you call Paul McCartney and Ringo Star The Beatles?may be you can but tecnically is not Queen of course. I try to avoid flamewars usually, but I got a question which I ask people from time to time - what was the name of the band from 1970 to 1973 ? I definitely wouldn't dare to make the decision if it's Queen or not Queen - for me it's always been Queen + Paul Rodgers or simply QPR, something like Heaven and Hell, or Andy Scott's Sweet |
Hitman1965 24.05.2009 14:49 |
david (galashiels) wrote: it was good to see, queen or queen+,or whatever you want to call them for what was my kids first concert...i liked paul rodgers it,s a shame they seem to be finished...as a singer paul was or is good,to many critics shouted him down in certain forums.,maybe one day he will return to queen...dont forget when you had paul as a singer you also had a great collection of music, with an unknown singer ,you would not have had..so you had in theary one of the strongest rock tours of the year.it has been said before.if you dont like it dont buy it.me,i loved it.and would never had missed the chance to go and see them play again .at my age(50+)it was more than likley my last chance to see queen one last time.so good luck paul in whatever you do in the future,as for me.you can return to queen anytime. Totally agree with comments above. I am and always will be a Queen fan first and a Paul Rodgers fan second. No way would I ever say that the last 5 years has been some kind of waste. Personally speaking it made me feel 10-20 years younger and I had a great time. I can see how some will get negative over the fact that Paul's plans seems to be stopping something that had only really just begun and emphasises that what we had was really Queen + someone else which is a bit of a shame. I hope that Brian and Roger do have some kind of final rally of concerts to let fans appreciate and demonstrate how fun the music of Queen has been for many many years. As for being the end of the line many performers/musicians are only in mid careers by the time they reach Brian and Rogers ages. Thanks for the ride Paul; long live Queen - with or without Paul. |
lalaalalaa 26.05.2009 07:50 |
L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: QUEEN 2 BOOKLET:QUEEN ARE FREDDIE MERCURY,BRIAN MAY,ROGER TAYLOR,JOHN DEACON. I think you should know this,as you are the expert,can you call Paul McCartney and Ringo Star The Beatles?may be you can but tecnically is not Queen of course. So if a band changes at least one member of the group, they can't go by the same name anymore? If that is the case, then Ozzy Osbourne has broken the rules on several occasions (or Michael Schenker, or Scorpions, or ect.) |
pittrek 26.05.2009 13:09 |
lalaalalaa wrote:L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: QUEEN 2 BOOKLET:QUEEN ARE FREDDIE MERCURY,BRIAN MAY,ROGER TAYLOR,JOHN DEACON. I think you should know this,as you are the expert,can you call Paul McCartney and Ringo Star The Beatles?may be you can but tecnically is not Queen of course.So if a band changes at least one member of the group, they can't go by the same name anymore? If that is the case, then Ozzy Osbourne has broken the rules on several occasions (or Michael Schenker, or Scorpions, or ect.) Or Deep Purple, Black Sabbath, Sweet, Rainbow, Metallica, Iron Maiden, AC/DC ...................... |
lalaalalaa 26.05.2009 16:21 |
pittrek wrote:lalaalalaa wrote:Or Deep Purple, Black Sabbath, Sweet, Rainbow, Metallica, Iron Maiden, AC/DC ......................L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: QUEEN 2 BOOKLET:QUEEN ARE FREDDIE MERCURY,BRIAN MAY,ROGER TAYLOR,JOHN DEACON. I think you should know this,as you are the expert,can you call Paul McCartney and Ringo Star The Beatles?may be you can but tecnically is not Queen of course.So if a band changes at least one member of the group, they can't go by the same name anymore? If that is the case, then Ozzy Osbourne has broken the rules on several occasions (or Michael Schenker, or Scorpions, or ect.) Megadeth, Alice Cooper, Blue Oyster Cult (?), Toto............... |
YourValentine 27.05.2009 11:12 |
Bob wrote: "Ringo wasn't a founding member of The Beatles, so I think that'd be a bit different from Brian and Roger, as they are the founding members of Queen. However, my opinion doesn't count, and I'm big enough to recognize that. If Ringo and Paul went out with Julian Lennon and Dhani Harrison and called it The Beatles, I'd respect them for doing what they want to do. It's their art, their legacy, and therefore it's ultimately their choice" I totally agree about the "my opinion does not count" statement. The Beatles is a very different story, though. Ringo may not have been a founding member of the Beatles but he was the only original drummer on the records from the start (except for the studio drummer on "Please Please me"). George Harrison survived the split of the Beatles for 30 years and he *always* said the Beatles would reform when "John Lennon is alive again". John Lennon left his estate to Yoko Ono who must be asked about all decisions involving the rights of John Lennon. Therefore it would be very difficult for Paul and Ringo to ignore the wishes of the two dead members and reform under the name of "The Beatles". In a totally different move Freddie Mercury left all decisions concerning his rights in Queen to Jim Beach knowing that JB would not cast any minority votes and cause the surviving members any trouble. By leaving his vote to Jim Beach he gave the surviving members total freedom in their decisions - knowing that he would soon be dead. John Deacon must be asked permission for all projects with the name "Queen" and he does not seem to mind, so why should anybody else mind? It's funny how some fans seem to think their opinion about the use of the name "Queen" has some sort of moral substance - that's not the case. |
Rich Tea 27.05.2009 18:39 |
Amen |
mike hunt 31.05.2009 05:44 |
glad it's over. Boring is the word that comes to mind. |
podders 31.05.2009 18:14 |
yeah..got to agree with the topic starter....... saw six great live shows and to see May and Taylor on the same stage since Wembley 86 and 92 was the best ever! Not too many bands nowadays could produce such an awe inspiring and memorable show. Until the next time.................... |
L-R-TIGER1994 31.05.2009 23:41 |
mike hunt wrote: glad it's over. Boring is the word that comes to mind. Wait to see Queen+Adam Lambert and we will regret everything we've said on this thead. |
mike hunt 01.06.2009 03:41 |
I won't be sorry, some people only liked 70's queen, and hated anything after that, while others like myself like almost everything until made in heaven in 1995. after that it's all downhill IMO. 'No one but you' would have been nice on MIH. While Queen + paul or anyone else for that matter does nothing for me. |
April 10.06.2009 16:11 |
Frankly, I am sorry it's over. I liked the project, I liked the album, I liked the possibility to see my favourite artists perform live. Where will they be now? Will they team with somebody else? Will they wait for Paul to come back? Is it good to change bands all the time? What do you think the situation will be like? |
steven 35638 14.06.2009 23:36 |
I am very thankful for Paul Rodgers and his work with Queen. He really does have an incredible voice! I respect 'the voice'! |
IReallyLoveQueen 23.08.2010 15:31 |
I LOVE QUEEN |
marcenciels 23.08.2010 18:26 |
YES! we should all thx Paul for getting Roger and Brian back to tour again in full. I'm not a Paul fan, but i dont down on him. he did his best, even if some of his way/versions/style made me grunt. Thx Paul. you're not my kind of singer. but you made me more happy than not... for the time it lasted ;) |
Queenman!! 12.11.2010 08:18 |
Saw them three times in 2005 and one time in 2008. Was a great experience. I saw Brian and Roger also in Amsterdam back in 2002, I believe, playing a miniset for Queensday. |
rottenjohnny1963 24.03.2011 10:18 |
paul rodgers is a great singer,probably in the top 10,but when you come into a band and sing in place of freddie mercury,the greatest singer and rock star of all time,you are gonna really be a piss poor imitation! it's like taking a nyc porterhouse steak and replacing it with a steaming pile of shit and calling it supper! |
the dude 1366 05.04.2011 00:54 |
I got to see Queen live BECAUSE of Paul Rodgers. There was no other chance for me. |
ckensingtn 28.04.2011 17:36 |
Yes thank you Paul for allowing 1000s of people to see Brian and Roger as Queen on more time. Enjoy the Journey |
phillyfan 26.05.2011 20:39 |
yeah Paul thanks for mailing it in on the 2008 tour and collecting your checks.in all the footage i have seen you look bored and there for the money.spend it wisely you wont be selling out large venues again. |
The Real Wizard 28.05.2011 11:59 |
phillyfan wrote: you wont be selling out large venues again. ================== Um, you do realize that Bad Company were about as big as Queen in the US, right? At the New Jersey '05 show it was the Bad Company songs that got most of the biggest cheers of the night. I was there - Bad Company and Feel Like Making Love got as big a reaction as BoRhap. |
phillyfan 28.05.2011 20:03 |
Oh Bob..Check your facts.As well versed as you are you should know that although yes BC had great success here it doesnt compare to Queen.And my point was that BC wont be playing US or oversees arenas ever again.But im still your biggest fan! |
mike hunt 30.05.2011 00:12 |
phillyfan wrote: Oh Bob..Check your facts.As well versed as you are you should know that although yes BC had great success here it doesnt compare to Queen.And my point was that BC wont be playing US or oversees arenas ever again.But im still your biggest fan! BC was pretty big in the states, and Queen were also pretty big, though not nearly as big as the rest of the world. In the states Queen's music has aged better than Bad Company, Only a few songs from BC has stood the test of time, while Queen has over a dozen, including non hits like Keep yourself alive and Tie your mother Down/Sheer heart Attack.... worldwide, it's no contest....Queen wins. In the states, Queen wins!....i hate the Phillies....Go Mets! |
phillyfan 30.05.2011 15:35 |
damn mets...we could have swept them but their bats finally woke up sun. |
mike hunt 30.05.2011 23:37 |
phillyfan wrote: damn mets...we could have swept them but their bats finally woke up sun. it's gonna be a long year for met fans, but eventually things will turn in the other direction like they alway's do... I just hope The mets are a great team again in my lifetime.....the phillies have a great rotation...i'm jealous. |
phillyfan 31.05.2011 15:54 |
mike it sucks because the Phils and the Mets are usually not good at the same time.Only the one year..2007.Otherwise one is rebuilding.You guys will be ok when the wilpons sell the team.oh let me do a QPR thingy..Hey Paul..how is that mansion in canada??Call it the Queen Castle. |