QueenZone discussion #1171758
Who r the QZ wankers?
| The_Disabled_Jester 23.03.2009 14:37 |
For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!! |
| L-R-TIGER1994 23.03.2009 14:43 |
Too many nowadays. |
| Yara 23.03.2009 15:00 |
The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!! Me. It's often recommended. Ignore me, Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, Charlie Brown, the abuser, and you'll be just fine. I don't know if he's actually one, but rumor has it that he is, so...he is! Anyway, I wish you good and that you might be able to keep a safe distance from US - we're the collective Freddie Krueger. |
| beautifulsoup 23.03.2009 15:49 |
You'll know who you'll want to avoid from reading their posts. Make your own decisions. |
| inu-liger 23.03.2009 16:54 |
-double post- |
| inu-liger 23.03.2009 16:55 |
Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jake Britt, ken8, Charles Baer, Evan Porada |
| Winter Land Man 23.03.2009 16:55 |
The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!! I'm quite impossible to ignore. And I never insult many people. Just four people on this forum in the past couple years. |
| inu-liger 23.03.2009 16:56 |
Jacob Britt wrote:The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!!I'm quite impossible to ignore. And I never insult many people. Just four people on this forum in the past couple years. Unfortunately, quite a few people think very lowly of you because of your at times childish actions against those four individuals. |
| Winter Land Man 23.03.2009 17:12 |
inu-liger wrote:Jacob Britt wrote:Unfortunately, quite a few people think very lowly of you because of your at times childish actions against those four individuals.The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!!I'm quite impossible to ignore. And I never insult many people. Just four people on this forum in the past couple years. And unfortunately, I think three of those people wrote nasty things about me. #1 The first person I insulted who is a member of this forum, in the past couple years, is you, and that was a plain old idiotic fight, it was a waste of time and I don't see a need to fight with you, because at least you are a Queen fan who collects things, like me, and that's something we have in common and if I ruined that, I'd never be able to enjoy your topics on Queen related discussions. #2 TREASURE MOMENT and I don't regret doing that as it was quite a laugh, and you know, those brothers in that band love to bam bam eachother. #3 RAFAEL, but I understand people are pissed about me insulting poor old Rafael, I mean the worst thing he does is cry and complain about the things I do to him. Threaten to call the police, FBI, CIA, and Barbara's home telephone number. He can say lies like "Jake lives at home with mommy" yet he can't take the heat if I lie about him. It's horrible and hypocritical. Someone needs to chop off the pubic hair on the top of his head, cause he's acting like a dick! #4 SONA, she's a 600lb fat old slug, I gave her advice on how to lose weight, but she started causing a scene and then she tried to insult me, so she deserved my insults and more. She dances with Raf when it's sunny out, and then they call it a day. |
| thequeen 23.03.2009 19:26 |
Sounds like fun Jake [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] !!! |
| Winter Land Man 23.03.2009 19:31 |
thequeen wrote: Sounds like fun Jake [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] !!! You changed your name! Naughty, naughty, naughty... |
| thequeen 23.03.2009 19:34 |
Britt, M.D. wrote:thequeen wrote: Sounds like fun Jake [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] !!!You changed your name! Naughty, naughty, naughty... I know eh .... Imagine inu-lager finds out .....oh-ohhhhh [img=/images/smiley/msn/embaressed_smile.gif][/img] |
| The Fairy King 23.03.2009 19:55 |
The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!! You just added yourself to that list... I wouldn't be surprised if you are just a clone. |
| paulosham 23.03.2009 20:13 |
The QZ wankers , sounds like a pub quiz team [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] but seriously anyone whos post is 6 feet of blank space is a wanker, I fucking hate that. |
| david(galashiels) 23.03.2009 20:16 |
is there a diffrence between a wanker and a self abuser?.i am not a wanker,but............... |
| Raf 23.03.2009 21:24 |
Dear Jake, now you've gone beyond insulting. Now you're throwing accusations. You'd better prove what you're saying or you could get into some real trouble. :) |
| thequeen 23.03.2009 22:31 |
Raf wrote: Dear Jake, now you've gone beyond insulting. Now you're throwing accusations. You'd better prove what you're saying or you could get into some real trouble. :) *Law & Order music plays* Raf is now suspect .... *how will this end ?* "Dun DUn DUN !!!!!" [img=/images/smiley/msn/whatchutalkingabout_smile.gif][/img] |
| john bodega 23.03.2009 23:48 |
I'm not a wanker, but I am frequently mistaken for one. |
| marcenciels 23.03.2009 23:51 |
the only thing to know here... is not to toss around those who toss around ;) |
| Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 24.03.2009 09:55 |
whats a wanker? |
| JoxerTheDeityPirate 24.03.2009 12:21 |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury wrote: whats a wanker?its a banker with a lisp |
| Sergei. 24.03.2009 15:54 |
Yara wrote:The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!!Me. It's often recommended. Ignore me, Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, Charlie Brown, the abuser, and you'll be just fine. I don't know if he's actually one, but rumor has it that he is, so...he is! Microwave? I don't recall him doing anything. Charlie Brown, or The Pest Formerly Known As Danny, is a stalker and a rapist. Hahah, alright, so he's not a rapist. Not to my knowledge, anyway. But he's a creeper and a lurker and keeps on coming back like the herpes. I bet he's reading this now. |
| Winter Land Man 24.03.2009 16:24 |
Sergei. wrote:Yara wrote:Microwave? I don't recall him doing anything. Charlie Brown, or The Pest Formerly Known As Danny, is a stalker and a rapist. Hahah, alright, so he's not a rapist. Not to my knowledge, anyway. But he's a creeper and a lurker and keeps on coming back like the herpes. I bet he's reading this now.The_Disabled_Jester wrote: For someone that's new to here it can be quite s strange place to try join in with... who should new comers be warned to stay the hell away from. I mean, I've heard folk go on about Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave... but who else should be put in the QZ ignore-the-fuck-out-of list? Just curious and bored!!!Me. It's often recommended. Ignore me, Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, Charlie Brown, the abuser, and you'll be just fine. I don't know if he's actually one, but rumor has it that he is, so...he is! People keep saying that about "Charlie Brown" but I don't remember anything about him on here much except complaints, I don't even know if I read any of his posts. |
| Sergei. 24.03.2009 16:46 |
O, wow, where does one start with Danny? |
| Winter Land Man 25.03.2009 19:54 |
The_Disabled_Jester is afraid to post his photo :-O |
| «¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» 25.03.2009 21:01 |
JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote:Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury wrote: whats a wanker?its a banker with a lisp I'm thinking its about a guy who is always jerking off?? |
| Winter Land Man 25.03.2009 21:42 |
«¤~Mrš. BÃD GÛŸ~¤» wrote:JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote:I'm thinking its about a guy who is always jerking off??Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury wrote: whats a wanker?its a banker with a lisp You're talking about the Treasure Moment brothers lol |
| Micrówave 26.03.2009 17:08 |
Yara wrote: Me. It's often recommended. Ignore me, Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jacob Britt, Microwave and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, Charlie Brown, the abuser, and you'll be just fine. I don't know if he's actually one, but rumor has it that he is, so...he is! Anyway, I wish you good and that you might be able to keep a safe distance from US - we're the collective Freddie Krueger. I agree completely. In fact, I would read Yara's posts about 3 or 4 times, just for merit. |
| Yogurt 26.03.2009 20:10 |
beautifulsoup wrote: You'll know who you'll want to avoid from reading their posts. Make your own decisions. I totally agree. |
| Poo, again 27.03.2009 14:57 |
@ Yara: I often completely ignore your posts. You're too kind and politically correct. You're by no means a "QZ Wanker", though. =) |
| ParisNair 27.03.2009 15:58 |
Britt, M.D. wrote: He can say lies like "Jake lives at home with mommy" yet he can't take the heat if I lie about him.Is anything wrong with that? I mean he maybe lying, but you seem more offended by his alleged statement that you live with your mom.I live with my mom (and dad) and so does my neighbour and many more people i know. What I'm trying to say is that out here in India it is perfectly OK for parents to live with their kid and his/her spouse in the same house. But from your post i get the idea that in your country it is taboo. And my 2 pence on the subject at hand...its not like anyone from here is going to stalk you in real life; this is just a forum and ignoring anyone just for who they are isn't be the right way to go about it IMO. There have been times when ppl have agreed with TM as well you know. So my advise would be to take each post for what it is and decide whether you wanna support it, attack it or ignore it. |
| thomasquinn 32989 27.03.2009 17:33 |
inu-liger wrote: Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jake Britt, ken8, Charles Baer, Evan Porada Does Evan Porada still dare show his fat, deformed and arch-evil digital person here? |
| inu-liger 28.03.2009 01:22 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:inu-liger wrote: Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jake Britt, ken8, Charles Baer, Evan PoradaDoes Evan Porada still dare show his fat, deformed and arch-evil digital person here? He hasn't in a while, but I wouldn't put it past him to wait a while longer until he tries to pull his B.S. again |
| Ms. Rebel 28.03.2009 14:14 |
JAMAICAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA |
| jadedlady 29.03.2009 04:24 |
Might as well ask [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] . Am I a part of this often mentioned group? |
| Yara 29.03.2009 08:44 |
No, my dear, you are not. The list is simple: Me - Yara, thequeen, Treasure Moment, Jake Britt, Evan Porada, Charles Baer, Ken8* and the abuser, Charlie Brown, aka Danny. Copy this list and you're fine, my dear, you'll have a wonderful experience in the website. Advice: - Don't speak with us. - DO NOT PROVIDE US ANY KIND OF PERSONAL INFORMATION. - Ignore what we write. - If you feel like having fun, and a lot of people are doing it, join in to ridicule us, but only if there are people enough, otherwise it's stressful and not very funny. - Do not pay attention to quibbles - "this one does not qualify as wanker, this does." No - all of us in this list DO qualify as wankers and this is at the same time AN ADVICE AND A WARNING. Wanker = The wanker is, generally, a very unpleasant people to be with, either because of mental illnesses, stupidity, idiocy; eloquent low IQ people with a vengeance, lack of decency, morals and sense of ridicule; psychos, losers, full-time egomaniacs; repugnant people. ---- People may share attributes of a wanker and fail to qualify as such: not every stupid person is a wanker. The wanker does display two or more of these attributes, BUT IN A VERY HIGH DEGREE AND WITHOUT TRYING TO AVOID SUCH BAD IMPULSES. The wanker doesn't care about being a wanker: he has no remorse, sense of control, ridicule or decency: he or she is only interested in giving vent to his or her repugnant personalities, without caring about people around them. --- I'm the Queen of the wankers and their representative in all questions, diplomatic or healthy-related ones. That DOES NOT MEAN YOU'RE OK WITH ME - NO! I'm the representative because I deceive people all the time into thinking that I'm not so much of a wanker; I'm the one who manages to be a wanker while representing the role of a normal user. That makes me, in certain ways, even more dangerous. That should put this thread to an end and let the newbies come to our web! Yara Wankers Department - Queenzone, Personal Board. |
| Ms. Rebel 29.03.2009 08:50 |
^I love you. |
| john bodega 29.03.2009 12:11 |
Yara wrote: Wanker = The wanker is, generally, a very unpleasant people to be with, either because of mental illnesses, stupidity, idiocy; eloquent low IQ people with a vengeance, lack of decency, morals and sense of ridicule; psychos, losers, full-time egomaniacs; repugnant people. You forgot naive and judgemental! |
| Yara 29.03.2009 13:30 |
Ockham's razor: avoid introducing units which are unnecessary for the explanation of something. People who are really naive either suffer from stupidity or have low-IQ. This doesn't qualify them as wankers - really naive people are, in fact, charming in many ways, cause they help us believe in Rousseau's assertion that human being are essentially, naturally good. They add a flavor of romanticism to life and, by doing so, don't annoy other people. Fake naives - There are the fake naives: those who put on airs of gullibility in order to advance personal interests. These are manipulative, perverse and usually harmful in the long run; these are more dangerous, mainly out of the web. They lack morals and respect for others and, therefore, are wankers according to the definition above. No need to add the category. I'll return to this. Judgemental - Unnecessary. These are wankers by definition - they lack sense of ridicule - they fail to see their own faults - and are very unpleasant to be with, especially if one is the target of the judgmental wanker, ---------- So, no. I'd recommend users to stick to the above definition of a wanker and both the warnings and advices attending it. --------- *** People, over time I'd explain more wanker-related doubts. *** Bear in mind that, if the definition is to have any usefulness, as I think it has, it can't start harboring under its conceptual framework every single kind of vice or perceived vice - that'd make the category useless in cognitive terms - that is, the things you think you have to add are likely TO FEATURE IN THE LIST ALREADY. *** Mind that each of us wankers are giving examples of what's a wanker everyday - so if doubts arise, read us briefly and carefully, and that's it. -------- Avoiding mistakes: There are people who have been called wankers and don't belong to the group. Microwave is by no means a wanker. He comes across as a nice, honest guy and he only draws some bitterness from people because he's not left-wing as 99% of the people on the website. Having a different political opinion, though, does not necessarily, and per se, turns one into a wanker. Zebonka12, who raised the doubt above, is no wanker either. He's playful, well-spirited and likes to do jokes, and people whose tolerance to humor is too low may end up mistaking him for a wanker. ------ Keep the questions coming but, above all, don't forget about the WARNINGS above - because we are usually sick, repugnant and sometimes abusers, we may actually cause some harm to people: it's not to be taken lightly. Wankers of my kind are the most dangerous, and that's why I am the representative of all 'em, of course. Yara Chief of the wankers division, queenzone forum, personal board. |
| Freya is quietly judging you. 29.03.2009 15:56 |
I wouldn't put Yara in the "wanker" catagory, in the "boring witterer" catagory maybe, but not in the "wanker" catagory. |
| Ms. Rebel 29.03.2009 16:00 |
^I agree. |
| Lisser 29.03.2009 23:21 |
Freya is quietly judging you. wrote: I wouldn't put Yara in the "wanker" catagory, in the "boring witterer" catagory maybe, but not in the "wanker" catagory. I'm sorry Yara but I have to agree. You're not a wanker at all, but your posts are just way too long for me to read. I really want to know what you're saying but I just don't have that kind of time. That is my loss though. |
| Raf 30.03.2009 00:37 |
I like reading Yara's posts, especially her posts about music - I always learn quite a lot when she goes on and on about what makes her enjoy Queen music ;D |
| john bodega 30.03.2009 01:50 |
Indeed, Yara's not a wanker. I think that Yara is a good, thoughtful forum user; someone who is (more or less) articulate and sensible. Yara's great, abiding flaw is that she seems to have no internal monologue. I think of hundreds of things while I'm sitting here posting on Queenzone, but I do not write most of them. Yara seems to put just about everything in... of course, if I came here with the sole purpose of learning things about fellow QZers, then that'd be great, but usually that's not why I stop by. No offense intended, I'm sure plenty of people like reading the long posts and whatnot. I think a bit of eloquence wouldn't go astray. |
| jadedlady 30.03.2009 04:49 |
Yara, you are not a wanker. Your posts are a delight to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] . |
| inu-liger 30.03.2009 05:05 |
jadedlady wrote: Yara, you are not a wanker. Your posts are a delight to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] . Agreed. One of the few smart posters here :-) |
| jadedlady 30.03.2009 11:51 |
inu-liger wrote:jadedlady wrote: Yara, you are not a wanker. Your posts are a delight to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] .Agreed. One of the few smart posters here :-) The same goes for you too [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] . |
| Ms. Rebel 30.03.2009 12:22 |
Lisser wrote:Freya is quietly judging you. wrote: I wouldn't put Yara in the "wanker" catagory, in the "boring witterer" catagory maybe, but not in the "wanker" catagory.I'm sorry Yara but I have to agree. You're not a wanker at all, but your posts are just way too long for me to read. I really want to know what you're saying but I just don't have that kind of time. That is my loss though. Same here. xD |
| Bo Rhap 30.03.2009 15:29 |
Yara is a very lovely person.Very articulate.Very knowledgeable and a joy to get to know. I have known her since i was Roger Meadow's tailor in this board.I would not hear of anything derogatory said about her. |
| Micrówave 30.03.2009 15:49 |
Page 3 and no Greg Brooks. Interesting. I would have thought he was a headlining act. |
| jadedlady 31.03.2009 04:39 |
|
| Winter Land Man 31.03.2009 05:13 |
Micrówave wrote: Page 3 and no Greg Brooks. Interesting. I would have thought he was a headlining act. I find him to be wonderful, a bit hated, yet totally loved, it always depends on who it is, the ones who are jealous are always the ones who hate him. |