Michael Allred 17.12.2008 04:07 |
After two world tours, a live album, two live DVDs (and a third on the way) plus a studio album of brand new material, have Queen and Paul Rodgers gone as far as they can go? Just how long is Paul willing to hang with Brian and Roger? Looking at Paul's track record, he doesn't stay with any one group for too long (I'd wager that at the most, there's one more album bearing the Queen+ Paul Rodgers name and they call it a day.) However let's say that they've decided to bring their boat into port and part ways *now*, who else could Brian and Roger work with? My humble suggestion is George Michael. Brian and Roger have always been rockers at heart and they've certainly been able to put it all out there (so to speak) with Paul, allowing them to play at full blast but by Paul's own admission, there are just some Queen songs he can't (or won't) do and unfortunately Queen's more pop oriented material has fallen by the wayside which one could almost describe as tragic. No "Killer Queen," no "Somebody to Love," the list goes on. Now we all know what George can do with "Somebody to Love" but imagine him bringing (back) to life "White Queen" or hearing some Queen songs performed live for the first time....."The Miracle," "You Don't Fool Me," etc etc. Paul sang material George couldn't possibly do and now perhaps George could be given the opportunity to sing the songs Paul could not. Brian and Roger gave several of Paul's songs a much needed jolt ("Bad Company," "Feel Like Makin Love") and so they could with George's. Queen+ George Michael, it seems like a reasonable pairing. What say you? |
Penetration_Guru 17.12.2008 04:51 |
Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael. Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth... |
inu-liger 17.12.2008 05:07 |
George Michael.....George Michael....................a-WHO? |
masterstroke_84 17.12.2008 07:02 |
I feel that Queen+Paul Rodgers have consolidated as a real new band (ignore the name issue for one day please), not another casting/guest artist thing from Brian & Roger... I think that when Paul leaves the ship, they're gonna feel again like 91 (saving the differences) and I doubt that Bri and Rog try again with a new singer (George michael for instance)... If Paul stays probably we see them again on tour one more time before their retirements from the stage, but if Paul leaves... is over. Whatever happens, this journey was amazing for me as a fan, for a lot of reasons... each one of us will have his feelings, but for me, this was amazing and full of great moments in the last 3 1/2 years.. so if it's over now, I CAN'T COMPLAIN :D Cheers, P. |
Marcelo_argentina 17.12.2008 07:41 |
So Killer Queen, Somebody to love and White Queen are Pop songs?????? I thought I want ot break free, Radio Ga Ga, Another one bites the dust were Pop...and we heard those ones from Paul, didn't we? Now, with the George Michael theme, I think he is a great singer, you don't need to be a genius to realized about that, but please be realistic, the guy just can't sing other songs...imagine for instance George singing Tie your mother down, I want it all, Hammer to fall, One Vision, Headlong, Fat bottom girls, we will rock you, and the list goes on and on...and now try to imagine a Queen concert with out these songs...waht dou you get?..yeah!! you would rather staying at home... |
AlexRocks 17.12.2008 11:19 |
George Michael has ruined himself with drugs too much to sing or peform. The last thing Queen need is a some self destructive tart. And this is coming from someone who use to like George Michael...fifteen years ago I must say. |
Michael Allred 17.12.2008 12:47 |
Penetration_Guru wrote:Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael.Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth... As always, I can always count on you to be a total fucking prick for absolutely no reason what so ever. I wonder if someone like you has the balls to say things like that to a person's face in real life or if you're just a total pussy who hides behind a keyboard? Hmm........ |
Michael Allred 17.12.2008 12:49 |
Marcelo_argentina wrote: So Killer Queen, Somebody to love and White Queen are Pop songs?????? I thought I want ot break free, Radio Ga Ga, Another one bites the dust were Pop...and we heard those ones from Paul, didn't we? Now, with the George Michael theme, I think he is a great singer, you don't need to be a genius to realized about that, but please be realistic, the guy just can't sing other songs...imagine for instance George singing Tie your mother down, I want it all, Hammer to fall, One Vision, Headlong, Fat bottom girls, we will rock you, and the list goes on and on...and now try to imagine a Queen concert with out these songs...waht dou you get?..yeah!! you would rather staying at home... Well Roger has sung "Radio Ga Ga" the majority of the time hasn't he? Regardless, most of the Queen material Paul handled was of the rock variety. and yes, I *know* George couldn't sing "TYMD" so I think you totally missed the point I was trying to make. |
Marcelo_argentina 17.12.2008 13:42 |
Did I miss the point you were trying to make just beacause I do not agree with you? Let's try at least to be realistic for one second, this is not a "TYMD" or "white queen" discussion..is it?..tell me a real set list that Queen could play with George, I mean, at least let's say 25 songs to play alive...Can you make a realistic setlist? I'm talking serious here...then we can discuss it! |
Raf 17.12.2008 13:49 |
Again? I thought this discussion had gotten too old during the 2005 tour... |
Michael Allred 17.12.2008 14:11 |
Marcelo_argentina wrote: Did I miss the point you were trying to make just beacause I do not agree with you? Let's try at least to be realistic for one second, this is not a "TYMD" or "white queen" discussion..is it?..tell me a real set list that Queen could play with George, I mean, at least let's say 25 songs to play alive...Can you make a realistic setlist? I'm talking serious here...then we can discuss it! Well no, you're perfectly free to disagree with me, I've no problem with that at all. It's just that I had already stated that Queen got their "rock fix" (if you will) with Paul but should they want to try the other side of their catalog (that Paul cannot handle, namely the poppy material) then they could hit it up with GM....so saying GM couldn't sing "TYMD" was already made obvious. Now as for your request of a setlist Brian/Roger could do with GM (and yes, GM has said he wishes to retire....but he's said that before a few years back and what did he end up doing? Touring. People change their minds) here's what they could do (and in no particular order.....) Somebody to Love Killer Queen You Don't Fool Me The Miracle White Queen (GM's voice would be beautiful on this I think) You're My Best Friend These Are the Days of Our Lives Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy Don't Stop Me Now Play the Game Save Me It's A Hard Life I Want to Break Free Friends Will Be Friends Breakthru Let Me Live I Was Born to Love You '39 Love of My Life Spread Your Wings Bicycle Race Dreamers Ball Calling All Girls Las Palabras De Amor Radio Ga Ga Fair enough? |
Marcelo_argentina 17.12.2008 14:47 |
That setlist is IMPRESSIVE!!! I must be honest dude, However nowadays the "Star" of the band is Brian May...and those songs would put him in the background, and that is why I was telling you about a realistic setlist, that seems to be more like a compiled CD...but sure I would like to see that setlist played in a big stadium, why not. |
Marcos Napier 17.12.2008 15:38 |
Who said that GM can't sing TYMD? Did he ever try? Anyone saw or hear that? Paul can't sing LOML either. |
redspecialusa 17.12.2008 16:02 |
Please, Dear GOD no...I'm elated with the Queen & Paul Rodgers Collaboration. I don't think a collaborative project with George Michael would work. Number 1, he would never do as well as Paul Rodgers has done with interpreting Queen's older material his own way. Number 2, George Michael isn't a rock vocalist...granted he would probably do a wonderful interpreting all of the slower ballads and such. But there are a lot more musical dimensions to Queen than ballads and pop; and respectfully to George Michael because I think he's a good singer with some good songs...Queen + George Michael WOULDN'T WORK!!! |
August R. 17.12.2008 16:49 |
Michael Allred wrote: Brian and Roger have always been rockers at heart I think you just answered your own question here. Brian and Roger chose to work with Paul because he's a rocker as well. Why would a guitarist and a drummer want to play piano/synth driven pop songs anyway? |
Mustapha_Ibrahim 17.12.2008 17:57 |
I would second your suggestion 15 years ago. It was indeed a very good idea. However, I think that by now even Brian and Roger have realised that the continuous use of the Queen name in their new projects will only discredit them. After the modest success of the album, it's time for them to put away the name and get on with their lives. This doesn't mean that another project with George Michael wouldn't be appreciated. I certainly would be pleased with it. |
April 17.12.2008 17:58 |
I've already written that if they had GM they would be thought to be doomed to have only gays. No GM, please. I have nothing against gays but won't it be too much of a good thing? |
doxonrox 17.12.2008 22:28 |
April wrote: I've already written that if they had GM they would be thought to be doomed to have only gays. No GM, please. I have nothing against gays but won't it be too much of a good thing? Who else in the band is gay? And who cares what their sexual orientation is? Other than you, of course. Your homophobia is poorly disguised - as is your ignorance. |
Michael Allred 18.12.2008 00:28 |
Marcelo_argentina wrote: That setlist is IMPRESSIVE!!! I must be honest dude, However nowadays the "Star" of the band is Brian May...and those songs would put him in the background, and that is why I was telling you about a realistic setlist, that seems to be more like a compiled CD...but sure I would like to see that setlist played in a big stadium, why not. Oh I dunno, I think it's realistic. I don't feel that Brian considers himself the "star" especially considering Roger's ample time in the spotlight. |
Michael Allred 18.12.2008 00:30 |
redspecialusa wrote: Please, Dear GOD no...I'm elated with the Queen & Paul Rodgers Collaboration. I don't think a collaborative project with George Michael would work. Number 1, he would never do as well as Paul Rodgers has done with interpreting Queen's older material his own way. Number 2, George Michael isn't a rock vocalist...granted he would probably do a wonderful interpreting all of the slower ballads and such. But there are a lot more musical dimensions to Queen than ballads and pop; and respectfully to George Michael because I think he's a good singer with some good songs...Queen + George Michael WOULDN'T WORK!!! We have established that George is not a rock vocalist, the whole point of his name being brought up is that GM could sing the songs that Paul could not. I agree there is more to Queen than just ballads/pop but at the same time, there's more to them than just rock music too. |
Michael Allred 18.12.2008 00:32 |
August R. wrote:Michael Allred wrote: Brian and Roger have always been rockers at heartI think you just answered your own question here. Brian and Roger chose to work with Paul because he's a rocker as well. Why would a guitarist and a drummer want to play piano/synth driven pop songs anyway? Why would they want to play their own music? Um, yeah.....not sure how to respond to that. |
Marcos Napier 18.12.2008 00:50 |
Mustapha_Ibrahim wrote: I would second your suggestion 15 years ago. It was indeed a very good idea. However, I think that by now even Brian and Roger have realised that the continuous use of the Queen name in their new projects will only discredit them. After the modest success of the album, it's time for them to put away the name and get on with their lives. That's the main reason GM "wouldn't work", not because of lack of "rock attitude". |
lalaalalaa 18.12.2008 10:49 |
George Michael is a great singer, but a terrible songwriter. Paul is a great singer and songwriter. |
Penetration_Guru 18.12.2008 16:32 |
Michael Allred wrote:Penetration_Guru wrote:As always, I can always count on you to be a total fucking prick for absolutely no reason what so ever. I wonder if someone like you has the balls to say things like that to a person's face in real life or if you're just a total pussy who hides behind a keyboard? Hmm........Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael.Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth... Oh dear, did my harsh words get you in to such a blind rage that my logical points were obscured? Sorry. |
inu-liger 18.12.2008 20:58 |
Penetration_Guru wrote:P_G, don't forget this is the same man who refuses to formally acknowledge that Japan has a 2 *CD* edition instead of a CD+DVD edition of "The Cosmos Rocks", as can be plainly seen on the OBI here in addition to all the older retail solicitations: link linkMichael Allred wrote:Oh dear, did my harsh words get you in to such a blind rage that my logical points were obscured? Sorry.Penetration_Guru wrote:As always, I can always count on you to be a total fucking prick for absolutely no reason what so ever. I wonder if someone like you has the balls to say things like that to a person's face in real life or if you're just a total pussy who hides behind a keyboard? Hmm........Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael.Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth... 09/15/2008 TOCP-70634 Japan 2 CD Set |
Michael Allred 19.12.2008 01:08 |
Penetration_Guru wrote:Michael Allred wrote:Oh dear, did my harsh words get you in to such a blind rage that my logical points were obscured? Sorry.Penetration_Guru wrote:As always, I can always count on you to be a total fucking prick for absolutely no reason what so ever. I wonder if someone like you has the balls to say things like that to a person's face in real life or if you're just a total pussy who hides behind a keyboard? Hmm........Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael.Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth... lalalalcowardlalalala. did you say something remotely interesting? |
Michael Allred 19.12.2008 01:11 |
inu-liger wrote:Penetration_Guru wrote:P_G, don't forget this is the same man who refuses to formally acknowledge that Japan has a 2 *CD* edition instead of a CD+DVD edition of "The Cosmos Rocks", as can be plainly seen on the OBI here in addition to all the older retail solicitations: link linkMichael Allred wrote:Oh dear, did my harsh words get you in to such a blind rage that my logical points were obscured? Sorry.Penetration_Guru wrote:As always, I can always count on you to be a total fucking prick for absolutely no reason what so ever. I wonder if someone like you has the balls to say things like that to a person's face in real life or if you're just a total pussy who hides behind a keyboard? Hmm........Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael.Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth...09/15/2008 TOCP-70634 Japan 2 CD Set Well if you had bothered to read up before opening your trap, you would have seen that I in fact HAVE acknowledged it at the official forums. If it's THAT big of a fucking deal to you go look it up but check your facts before making yourself look like a tool. |
August R. 19.12.2008 11:18 |
Michael Allred wrote:August R. wrote:Why would they want to play their own music? Um, yeah.....not sure how to respond to that.Michael Allred wrote: Brian and Roger have always been rockers at heartI think you just answered your own question here. Brian and Roger chose to work with Paul because he's a rocker as well. Why would a guitarist and a drummer want to play piano/synth driven pop songs anyway? Think harder. It'll dawn to you. |
Fone Bone 19.12.2008 12:10 |
GM has sung Somebody To Love well once 15 years ago PR has successfully fronted QPR and sung an entire set of Queen songs during two arena tours in the last 3 years I don't fantasize about George Michael fronting Queen, I a am grateful towards Paul ! And I think the best way to enjoy Freddie-penned masterpieces of the 70's (FOTW, Millionaire, DOTL etc.) is to listen to them performed by the man himself Lily Of The Valley by George Michael ? No thanks. I'd rather go through Seagull ;P |
inu-liger 19.12.2008 15:48 |
Michael Allred wrote:inu-liger wrote:Well if you had bothered to read up before opening your trap, you would have seen that I in fact HAVE acknowledged it at the official forums. If it's THAT big of a fucking deal to you go look it up but check your facts before making yourself look like a tool.Penetration_Guru wrote:P_G, don't forget this is the same man who refuses to formally acknowledge that Japan has a 2 *CD* edition instead of a CD+DVD edition of "The Cosmos Rocks", as can be plainly seen on the OBI here in addition to all the older retail solicitations: link linkMichael Allred wrote:Oh dear, did my harsh words get you in to such a blind rage that my logical points were obscured? Sorry.Penetration_Guru wrote:As always, I can always count on you to be a total fucking prick for absolutely no reason what so ever. I wonder if someone like you has the balls to say things like that to a person's face in real life or if you're just a total pussy who hides behind a keyboard? Hmm........Michael Allred wrote: My humble suggestion is George Michael.Ignoring the comedy goldmine that is the second word, the answer to your question is that it was considered about 15 years ago AND WAS DISCARDED. Furthermore, GM has just retired from touring, which surely puts him even FURTHER out of the picture. Still, your postcount's gone up by one, so it wasn't a total waste of bandwidth...09/15/2008 TOCP-70634 Japan 2 CD Set You should talk. You're the one who made the big deal out of it in the first place when I mentioned at first that Japan was getting a 2CD edition. You clearly don't even know how to read Japanese, as I posted the portions of the text in QOL where it clearly said 2CD. Several websites there all said the same thing. I know how the solicitations work over there, Mike. I order from Japan all the time, and they're very RARELY ever wrong in their solicitation's descriptions. They're not as prone to mistakes as, say, Hollywood Records. And where on QOL did you post that? I don't have time to trawl through those useless topics there to find such an acknowledgment. |
Penetration_Guru 19.12.2008 16:13 |
I'm being called a coward by a man sitting behind a keyboard! I'm entertained by that, thanks Michael. |
Michael Allred 19.12.2008 22:37 |
Penetration_Guru wrote: I'm being called a coward by a man sitting behind a keyboard! I'm entertained by that, thanks Michael. You start shit & talk shit behind the safety on your monitor knowing damn well you'd never do it to a person's face. Yes, that makes you a coward. Glad you find your cowardice entertaining. |
Michael Allred 19.12.2008 22:41 |
You should talk. You're the one who made the big deal out of it in the first place when I mentioned at first that Japan was getting a 2CD edition. You clearly don't even know how to read Japanese, as I posted the portions of the text in QOL where it clearly said 2CD. Several websites there all said the same thing. I know how the solicitations work over there, Mike. I order from Japan all the time, and they're very RARELY ever wrong in their solicitation's descriptions. They're not as prone to mistakes as, say, Hollywood Records. And where on QOL did you post that? I don't have time to trawl through those useless topics there to find such an acknowledgment. I never said anyone was wrong, flat out. I *always* maintained that I needed confirmation first but I'm not rehashing this thing again. You can find it at QOL in 1 of the 2 Q+PR forums with a rather obvious subject title. |
inu-liger 20.12.2008 00:09 |
Michael Allred wrote:You should talk. You're the one who made the big deal out of it in the first place when I mentioned at first that Japan was getting a 2CD edition. You clearly don't even know how to read Japanese, as I posted the portions of the text in QOL where it clearly said 2CD. Several websites there all said the same thing. I know how the solicitations work over there, Mike. I order from Japan all the time, and they're very RARELY ever wrong in their solicitation's descriptions. They're not as prone to mistakes as, say, Hollywood Records. And where on QOL did you post that? I don't have time to trawl through those useless topics there to find such an acknowledgment.I never said anyone was wrong, flat out. I *always* maintained that I needed confirmation first but I'm not rehashing this thing again. You can find it at QOL in 1 of the 2 Q+PR forums with a rather obvious subject title. You were and ARE talking to a guy here who has a fairly good (though small) knowledge of Japanese, and how to read their listings. I HAVE to use it (Japanese characters) when I use certain auction services there to buy stuff you can't find on eBay (cheaply at least) - as they almost never use English words there, let alone English characters in the auction titles. Doesn't that count for something?? I even pointed it OUT to you on QOL with the exact text from those solicitations, that had the SAME INFORMATION across all those MULTIPLE RETAIL WEBSITES there! But you essentially called me a liar. You got proven WRONG in the end, and I was right about it all along :-) |
inu-liger 20.12.2008 00:11 |
Michael Allred wrote:Penetration_Guru wrote: I'm being called a coward by a man sitting behind a keyboard! I'm entertained by that, thanks Michael.You start shit & talk shit behind the safety on your monitor knowing damn well you'd never do it to a person's face. Yes, that makes you a coward. Glad you find your cowardice entertaining. Tit for tat . . . how fun. Can we rent WWE's wrestling ring? I'll be glad to serve up popcorn :-) |
Michael Allred 20.12.2008 00:47 |
inu-liger wrote:Michael Allred wrote:You were and ARE talking to a guy here who has a fairly good (though small) knowledge of Japanese, and how to read their listings. I HAVE to use it (Japanese characters) when I use certain auction services there to buy stuff you can't find on eBay (cheaply at least) - as they almost never use English words there, let alone English characters in the auction titles. Doesn't that count for something?? I even pointed it OUT to you on QOL with the exact text from those solicitations, that had the SAME INFORMATION across all those MULTIPLE RETAIL WEBSITES there! But you essentially called me a liar. You got proven WRONG in the end, and I was right about it all along :-)You should talk. You're the one who made the big deal out of it in the first place when I mentioned at first that Japan was getting a 2CD edition. You clearly don't even know how to read Japanese, as I posted the portions of the text in QOL where it clearly said 2CD. Several websites there all said the same thing. I know how the solicitations work over there, Mike. I order from Japan all the time, and they're very RARELY ever wrong in their solicitation's descriptions. They're not as prone to mistakes as, say, Hollywood Records. And where on QOL did you post that? I don't have time to trawl through those useless topics there to find such an acknowledgment.I never said anyone was wrong, flat out. I *always* maintained that I needed confirmation first but I'm not rehashing this thing again. You can find it at QOL in 1 of the 2 Q+PR forums with a rather obvious subject title. so you were saying something about ME making a big deal out of it? dude, get a fucking life already. holy christ, when you win at Monopoly do you slame the dice down and go "in your face mother fuckers!" even when you're only playing your parents? LOL, pathetic. |
inu-liger 20.12.2008 01:10 |
Oi, it's my turn now to make a big deal out of it, bitch. Fair's fair, inn'it? Wanna take it further, feel free to head up to the arctic north. I'll be waiting. |
Michael Allred 20.12.2008 14:52 |
inu-liger wrote: Oi, it's my turn now to make a big deal out of it, bitch. Fair's fair, inn'it? Wanna take it further, feel free to head up to the arctic north. I'll be waiting. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Are you and your anime characters gonna be waiting for me? or possibly that mutated group of freaks you call a rock band? Spare me. |
inu-liger 20.12.2008 16:04 |
Very mature tactics there, Sir Allred :-) |
Penetration_Guru 20.12.2008 17:56 |
Michael Allred wrote:Penetration_Guru wrote: I'm being called a coward by a man sitting behind a keyboard! I'm entertained by that, thanks Michael.You start shit & talk shit behind the safety on your monitor knowing damn well you'd never do it to a person's face. Yes, that makes you a coward. Glad you find your cowardice entertaining. Why wouldn't I say anything to your face? |
Saint Jiub 20.12.2008 21:00 |
Oh boy ... It's the dynamic duo ... Inu and PG (Batman & Robin). I assume Allred is the Joker, as GM can't do the hard rockers. Can one imagine a Queen album or a Queen concert without any hard rockers? What is GM doing nowadays anyway? |
inu-liger 20.12.2008 23:43 |
A Queen album completely devoid of ROCK songs?? Boy, that would not be good. First thing that comes to mind if that were the case would be, um.............Queen + Eminem? |
Michael Allred 21.12.2008 14:15 |
inu-liger wrote: Very mature tactics there, Sir Allred :-) Coming from someone with an intense and burning desire for all thing Pokemon, that's funny. |
Michael Allred 21.12.2008 14:17 |
Penetration_Guru wrote:Michael Allred wrote:Why wouldn't I say anything to your face?Penetration_Guru wrote: I'm being called a coward by a man sitting behind a keyboard! I'm entertained by that, thanks Michael.You start shit & talk shit behind the safety on your monitor knowing damn well you'd never do it to a person's face. Yes, that makes you a coward. Glad you find your cowardice entertaining. Wow, despite your varied vocabulary, you are stupid. |
Michael Allred 21.12.2008 14:18 |
Panchgani wrote: Oh boy ... It's the dynamic duo ... Inu and PG (Batman & Robin). I assume Allred is the Joker, as GM can't do the hard rockers. Well those two would make for a fabulously gay duo. |
Marcos Napier 22.12.2008 10:33 |
Coincidence... yesterday VH1 showed in a row a Zappa video, then Wham - Freedom, then Queen, You're my best friend. I think they also want him after the +. |
inu-liger 23.12.2008 01:55 |
Michael Allred wrote:Panchgani wrote: Oh boy ... It's the dynamic duo ... Inu and PG (Batman & Robin). I assume Allred is the Joker, as GM can't do the hard rockers.Well those two would make for a fabulously gay duo. A Troll's Golden Rule: When all else fails, lay on the homosexual jokes |
Michael Allred 23.12.2008 02:00 |
inu-liger wrote:Michael Allred wrote:A Troll's Golden Rule: When all else fails, lay on the homosexual jokesPanchgani wrote: Oh boy ... It's the dynamic duo ... Inu and PG (Batman & Robin). I assume Allred is the Joker, as GM can't do the hard rockers.Well those two would make for a fabulously gay duo. I thought the troll's golden rule was to entice stupid people from Canada to come under their bridge by offering a treasure trove of Pokemon figures? |
inu-liger 23.12.2008 06:16 |
Michael Allred wrote:inu-liger wrote:I thought the troll's golden rule was to entice stupid people from Canada to come under their bridge by offering a treasure trove of Pokemon figures?Michael Allred wrote:A Troll's Golden Rule: When all else fails, lay on the homosexual jokesPanchgani wrote: Oh boy ... It's the dynamic duo ... Inu and PG (Batman & Robin). I assume Allred is the Joker, as GM can't do the hard rockers.Well those two would make for a fabulously gay duo. LOL not so last I checked >.> Maybe that works with pedophile priests and children, regardless of location. |
April 24.12.2008 17:24 |
doxonrox wrote:April wrote: I've already written that if they had GM they would be thought to be doomed to have only gays. No GM, please. I have nothing against gays but won't it be too much of a good thing?Who else in the band is gay? And who cares what their sexual orientation is? Other than you, of course. Your homophobia is poorly disguised - as is your ignorance. It is you who are a homophob. That is clearly seen. As by asking the question: who else is gay? you are trying to conceal the fact that Freddie was (you can't but know it!). Why would you do it? You can't be that ignorant. As for me, I love Freddie Mercury very much and absolutely don't care what he was. But George Michael's music put me to sleep, I don't like him. This is my personal opinion, and I have the right to say so. |
IReallyLoveQueen 23.08.2010 15:40 |
I LOVE QUEEN |