QueenZone discussion #1147359

Treasure Moment wrote: stupid mindless idiots, dont you know it doesnt matter who wins because they are both puppets of people behind the curtain?

ThomasQuinn wrote: You couldn't possibly know how right I hope you are. Oh, and I doubt the results will be in *tomorrow*. I mean, voting ends around what, 9pm local time?

ThomasQuinn wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote: stupid mindless idiots, dont you know it doesnt matter who wins because they are both puppets of people behind the curtain?

 Yup, and pigs fly, France is a collective hallucination, sharks are vegetarians and DMT is the key to the universe.

ThomasQuinn wrote:

  Treasure Moment wrote: stupid mindless idiots, dont you know it doesnt matter who wins because they are both puppets of people behind the curtain?

 Yup, and pigs fly, France is a collective hallucination, sharks are vegetarians and DMT is the key to the universe.

Micrówave wrote: I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.

  Treasure Moment wrote: stupid mindless idiots, dont you know it doesnt matter who wins because they are both puppets of people behind the curtain?

                                                                                                                              Treasure Moment wrote:                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Micrówave wrote:                                                                                                                               I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.                                                                                                                              

David rockefeller, the Rothchilds and the other extremely rich elite families are the ones who OWN them all, they own the private central banks, the federal reserve and control everything, the president candidates are just small puppets with no power, wake up naive people.

Micrówave wrote: I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.

Lisser wrote:

Micrówave wrote: I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.

I am too.

April wrote:

Lisser wrote:

Micrówave wrote: I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.

I am too.

What a clever statement. The guy behind the scenes is laughing at you all. He is pushing Obama this time, cause if he wanted the Rep Party to win, he would have promoted somebody more decent that McCain and the Girl. This couple is very strange. Don't you think so? As if somebody is saying to the votes: certainly don't vote for them, obviously not, the pair is funny...

Sergei. wrote:

  April wrote:  

      Lisser wrote:      

      Micrówave wrote:       I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.      

  I am too.  

What a clever statement. The guy behind the scenes is laughing at you all. He is pushing Obama this time, cause if he wanted the Rep Party to win, he would have promoted somebody more decent that McCain and the Girl. This couple is very strange. Don't you think so? As if somebody is saying to the votes: certainly don't vote for them, obviously not, the pair is funny...

Quit being so fucking rude and ignorant. Not supporting a candidate/candidates and not agreeing with their views doesn't necessarily warrant ridicule of things that don't have anything to do with their political ideas and policies. "The Girl"? Really? Come on now. And in your post from another thread, to say she looks like "A hawky bird, not a nice face"? That's just stupid and immature.     

Poo, again wrote:

Sergei. wrote:

  April wrote:  

      Lisser wrote:      

      Micrówave wrote:       I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.      

  I am too.  

What a clever statement. The guy behind the scenes is laughing at you all. He is pushing Obama this time, cause if he wanted the Rep Party to win, he would have promoted somebody more decent that McCain and the Girl. This couple is very strange. Don't you think so? As if somebody is saying to the votes: certainly don't vote for them, obviously not, the pair is funny...

Quit being so fucking rude and ignorant. Not supporting a candidate/candidates and not agreeing with their views doesn't necessarily warrant ridicule of things that don't have anything to do with their political ideas and policies. "The Girl"? Really? Come on now. And in your post from another thread, to say she looks like "A hawky bird, not a nice face"? That's just stupid and immature.     

April is entitled to having his/her own opinion. It may be unnecessary, but still. And for your information, you may not be a tsar. You may be a tsarina. Fool. (Plzzz be kind 2 me lolzzz!!11)

Treasure Moment wrote:

Micrówave wrote: I'm voting for a behind the scenes guy who controls everything.

David rockefeller, the Rothchilds and the other extremely rich elite families are the ones who OWN them all, they own the private central banks, the federal reserve and control everything, the president candidates are just small puppets with no power, wake up naive people.

Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

MasterHistoryGirl wrote:

  Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

*laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.  There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.  I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first. 

Treasure Moment wrote:

MasterHistoryGirl wrote:

  Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

*laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.  There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.  I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first. 

you know so much about nothing at all, wake up naive girl, both parties are controlled by the same people, its an illusion of choice.

MasterHistoryGirl wrote:

  Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

*laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.  There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.  I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first. 

Navillus (formerly Smitty) wrote:

              Treasure Moment wrote:              

                              MasterHistoryGirl wrote:                              

                                                              Poo, again wrote:                               I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me:       Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.                              

              *laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.        There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.        I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first.                       

              you know so much about nothing at all, wake up naive girl, both parties are controlled by the same people, its an illusion of choice.                      

Man, I totally agree with you, but you left out the very obvious and dangerous influence of a group of powerful beings: The Lizard-Men Only a naive fool would leave them out, seeing as how they control all aspects of life in the USA. Everything from the stock market to McDonalds to Sarah Palin are either controlled by lizard people, or are lizard people themselves (see: Sarah Palin). Don't believe me? Hmm, who did a campaign event last night in Roswell, NM? Case closed..

Poo, again wrote:

MasterHistoryGirl wrote:

  Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

*laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.  There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.  I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first. 

This system isn't very democratic though, is it? It wouldn't surprise me at all if people don't necessarily agree with either Rep or Dem, but vote for them because they know that they're the biggest parties and don't want to just throw away their vote to a party that may finish third in the race. Or maybe Americans are simply so narrow-minded that they need only two political parties. I sure hope it isn't true.

MasterHistoryGirl wrote:

Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

*laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.  There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.  I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first. 

Treasure Moment wrote:

Navillus (formerly Smitty) wrote:

 Treasure Moment wrote:  

  MasterHistoryGirl wrote:

Poo, again wrote: I don't know too much about the American system when it comes to elections so I was hoping a native *cough* could explain something to me: Is any other political party than Rep or Dem valid? If so, why do these parties get all the attention? Surely there must be more political opinions in a country as large as yours, more than can be fit into just two political parties.

 *laughs*  That's an interesting question actually.  When the US system was founded, there were several parties.  And the first President (George Washington) warned about the dangers of political parties even forming.  But in true American form, we didn't listen.   There are lots of parties here in the US.  The Libertarians, The Greens, The Tax Party...all kinds.  They do exist, and they are valid in the sense that they normally get a few votes every election and have some people who support them.  However, they are not valid in the sense that they don't get enough votes to win anything.  The Democrats and the Republicans are the two biggest parties, and they take the lions share of the votes between them every year.  Because of the way the system is set up, there are only seats awarded to the top 2 winners, which are always Democrats or Republicans; it's only a matter of who is on top.  And the Presidential system is a "winner take all" system.  Whoever gets to 270 electoral college votes wins.  I'd personally love to see a more parliamentary system, where seats are awarded based on a percentage of the vote and we finally get some other parties in Congress.  But I'm pretty sure pigs will fly first. 

  you know so much about nothing at all, wake up naive girl, both parties are controlled by the same people, its an illusion of choice.  

Man, I totally agree with you, but you left out the very obvious and dangerous influence of a group of powerful beings: The Lizard-Men Only a naive fool would leave them out, seeing as how they control all aspects of life in the USA. Everything from the stock market to McDonalds to Sarah Palin are either controlled by lizard people, or are lizard people themselves (see: Sarah Palin). Don't believe me? Hmm, who did a campaign event last night in Roswell, NM? Case closed..

.