Reading Princess 26.09.2008 19:59 |
Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead). |
L-R-TIGER1994 26.09.2008 20:39 |
You could have downloaded it for free and you would have saved a trip to ZAWI. |
PieterMC 26.09.2008 21:56 |
clear wrote: Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead).Oh stop being so dramatic. |
Reading Princess 26.09.2008 22:01 |
Ha ha, it does sound dramatic doesn't it. Here's why - a review I wrote when I first heard it... 1 Cosmos Rockin – The guitar just after the opening “What planet is this?” is a direct steal from the opening of “I Would Do Anything For Love” by Meat Loaf.The structure sounds like a Jeff Lynne (ELO) song . The backing vocals remind me of The Beasties Boys “Fight For Your Right To PAAAARTY” thing from the 80’s – “the policeman says Stop This Noise”.And don’t forget , this is the opener – supposedly designed to grab us. 2 Time To Shine – Oh shit, is he going to try a Mustapha… no wait…it’s turned into Pinball Wizard. The wailing chorus sounds like John Farnham. 3 Still Burnin – A dirge. I was trying to identify the middle 8 guitar sound and was listening to clips from NOTW and Jazz and it made me sad. The quality and originality of the those albums just pisses over this. And then, OH MY GOD, the WWRY drum/clap. Bloody hell, are you doing a new album or is it a tribue. Why Paul Rogers would allow that is a mystery. 4 Small – Is this an attempt at an “Imagine” (music, not lyrics). I quite like the melody. That fazy bit towards the end is also a bit ELO (I suppose it’s the cosmos connection – Jeff should claim royalties). 5 Warboys – The opening reminded me of “Freedom Train” from “Happiness” but when I listened to “FT” it just reminded me of “Liar” (the syncopated rhythm). After that initial interest it goes nowhere. Another sludgy mess. I know that PR is a respected singer etc but to me he sounds constipated and having a good strain on the bog. 6 We Believe – The start of this sounds like a cross between the song that opened the last tour (Reaching Out?) and a Clliff Richard Christmas number. Then Brian rips off the riff from “Leaving Home Ain’t Easy” (keep up you youngun’s). When it gets going those typical Queen block harmonies are so obviously missing Fred’s voice. And the lyrics…. Brian Ithink..have an animal rights element at the end. Good on you Brian. How did you get Roger “Countryside Alliance” to agree to that one? 7 Call Me – A playful Brian number (sort of “Let Your Heart Rule Your Head”). Paul is much too butch for this though and has to finish the track with a dismissive laugh (as if to say “what a crock”… indeed). 8 Voodoo – Just un-necessary indulgent wank. At least “See What A Fool I’ve Been” had Fred’s voice on it. 9 Some Things That Glitter – Another song that tries to create interest by bringing in the drums after the first chorus (“Small”). This is SO weak. 10 C-lebrity – Yes, the people you refer to in the lyric have nothing to offer – but, obviously, neither have you anymore. And this was the single!!!!!!!! Old, bitter men realising their time in the sun has gone. 11 Through The Night – By this time even the most ardent QPR apologist must be reaching for the asprin bottle. I can’t think of any occasion in life when I’d like to listen to this depressing rot. 12 Say It’s No True – My partner (who only knows Queens music through me) said “Isn’t this Roger’s solo thing. Of course he’s right. It’s a rip off of “Foreign Sand”. 13 Surf’s Up, Schools Out – Jim Steinman (who wrote Meat Loaf’s most successful stuff) had a solo album called “Bad For Good”. The title track was used by Meat Loaf on his last album with Mr Brian May as guest guitarist. What a surprise that the original Jim Steinman album has a track called “Surf’s Up”. For good measure they’ve added the Alice Cooper title “School’s Out” and included some “Flash” style dialogue about weather warnings at the beginning. |
PieterMC 26.09.2008 22:16 |
clear wrote: 7 Call Me – A playful Brian numberShame that Paul wrote it. |
Reading Princess 26.09.2008 22:33 |
Well. I'l stand corrected if that is so. I thought all the songs were credited to all 3. And this track sounds, musically, so obviously one of Brian's quirky numbers. Maybe Paul wrote the lyrics. |
Ray D O'Gaga 26.09.2008 22:45 |
clear wrote: Ha ha, it does sound dramatic doesn't it. Here's why - a review I wrote when I first heard it... 1 Cosmos Rockin – The guitar just after the opening “What planet is this?” is a direct steal from the opening of “I Would Do Anything For Love” by Meat Loaf.The structure sounds like a Jeff Lynne (ELO) song . The backing vocals remind me of The Beasties Boys “Fight For Your Right To PAAAARTY” thing from the 80’s – “the policeman says Stop This Noise”.And don’t forget , this is the opener – supposedly designed to grab us. 2 Time To Shine – Oh shit, is he going to try a Mustapha… no wait…it’s turned into Pinball Wizard. The wailing chorus sounds like John Farnham. 3 Still Burnin – A dirge. I was trying to identify the middle 8 guitar sound and was listening to clips from NOTW and Jazz and it made me sad. The quality and originality of the those albums just pisses over this. And then, OH MY GOD, the WWRY drum/clap. Bloody hell, are you doing a new album or is it a tribue. Why Paul Rogers would allow that is a mystery. 4 Small – Is this an attempt at an “Imagine” (music, not lyrics). I quite like the melody. That fazy bit towards the end is also a bit ELO (I suppose it’s the cosmos connection – Jeff should claim royalties). 5 Warboys – The opening reminded me of “Freedom Train” from “Happiness” but when I listened to “FT” it just reminded me of “Liar” (the syncopated rhythm). After that initial interest it goes nowhere. Another sludgy mess. I know that PR is a respected singer etc but to me he sounds constipated and having a good strain on the bog. 6 We Believe – The start of this sounds like a cross between the song that opened the last tour (Reaching Out?) and a Clliff Richard Christmas number. Then Brian rips off the riff from “Leaving Home Ain’t Easy” (keep up you youngun’s). When it gets going those typical Queen block harmonies are so obviously missing Fred’s voice. And the lyrics…. Brian Ithink..have an animal rights element at the end. Good on you Brian. How did you get Roger “Countryside Alliance” to agree to that one? 7 Call Me – A playful Brian number (sort of “Let Your Heart Rule Your Head”). Paul is much too butch for this though and has to finish the track with a dismissive laugh (as if to say “what a crock”… indeed). 8 Voodoo – Just un-necessary indulgent wank. At least “See What A Fool I’ve Been” had Fred’s voice on it. 9 Some Things That Glitter – Another song that tries to create interest by bringing in the drums after the first chorus (“Small”). This is SO weak. 10 C-lebrity – Yes, the people you refer to in the lyric have nothing to offer – but, obviously, neither have you anymore. And this was the single!!!!!!!! Old, bitter men realising their time in the sun has gone. 11 Through The Night – By this time even the most ardent QPR apologist must be reaching for the asprin bottle. I can’t think of any occasion in life when I’d like to listen to this depressing rot. 12 Say It’s No True – My partner (who only knows Queens music through me) said “Isn’t this Roger’s solo thing. Of course he’s right. It’s a rip off of “Foreign Sand”. 13 Surf’s Up, Schools Out – Jim Steinman (who wrote Meat Loaf’s most successful stuff) had a solo album called “Bad For Good”. The title track was used by Meat Loaf on his last album with Mr Brian May as guest guitarist. What a surprise that the original Jim Steinman album has a track called “Surf’s Up”. For good measure they’ve added the Alice Cooper title “School’s Out” and included some “Flash” style dialogue about weather warnings at the beginning.This is SO weak. |
PieterMC 26.09.2008 22:59 |
clear wrote: Well. I'l stand corrected if that is so. I thought all the songs were credited to all 3. And this track sounds, musically, so obviously one of Brian's quirky numbers. Maybe Paul wrote the lyrics.Yes they are all credited to QPR but they have been quoted in several interviews that Paul wrote that one. They did not collaborate writing on any tracks. |
Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira 26.09.2008 23:23 |
PieterMC wrote:LOLclear wrote: Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead).Oh stop being so dramatic. |
Nacho_itu 27.09.2008 01:44 |
clear wrote: Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead).a proper queen fan? Tell me how i can recognize a PROPER queen fan, please... A shame you didn't like the record, better luck next time... some people like it... some people not... but you don't need to be such an assh*le with people actually liking this album. That is sooo childish... and looking the way you judge every song, i think you are very childish... yeah. Grow up, write something serious. It will make Queenzone a better place to share our opinions. |
L-R-TIGER1994 27.09.2008 02:00 |
A PROPER Queen fan is the one that recognizes this new album as....(I was going to say shit but regreted). |
A_WintersTale 27.09.2008 06:00 |
clear wrote: Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead). a proper queen fan? Tell me how i can recognize a PROPER queen fan, please... A shame you didn't like the record, better luck next time... some people like it... some people not... but you don't need to be such an assh*le with people actually liking this album. That is sooo childish... and looking the way you judge every song, i think you are very childish... yeah. Grow up, write something serious. It will make Queenzone a better place to share our opinions. Even if clear writes you full guidelines of 500 pages you still wont be able to define a proper queen fan, simply because your intelectual capacity won't permit it. How do I judge for your intelectual capacity? By you praising something that is so obviously week as an art-work just because some smart ass put your prefered label on it. I bet you shop replica watches from the China shop at your place just because it SAYS Cartier on it. Good for you, buddy, keep spending YOUR money on rubbish. The shop-tender will be just happy on what kinda consummer-oriented prack with no basic criterea on good quality and bad quality you are! You'll make him happy, really! Clear, buddy, just to let you know - after listening to SINT and C-lebrity, I didn't even dare to buy the crap. |
TheGame 27.09.2008 06:27 |
PieterMC wrote: Yes they are all credited to QPR but they have been quoted in several interviews that Paul wrote that one. They did not collaborate writing on any tracks.Thats actually a new one, didnt know this. Thought they collaborated on atleast some of the tracks. It would be the natural thing to do in a new group. As for the review goes: This is a person that cant let go of the past. It shows a narrow-minded person that cant accept the present. |
Holly2003 27.09.2008 07:16 |
clear wrote: Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead).Thin Lizzy rock. But your views on TCR are a bit odd. Each to his own. |
JeroenG 27.09.2008 07:27 |
(...) (no need to say anything) |
Queengirl47 27.09.2008 09:41 |
I LOVE, LOVE the TCR album!! It's something I haven't heard in a long time. Its fresh, fun, and just COOL ! Its FAR from crap, WTF?!.... it's a great album. Im in Houston, Texas and ALL my friends who are young, and don't know much about Queen OR QPR like the album. They like it a lot. when we are on the road etc, they always wanteding me to put it in.. They say its catchy, and THEY will be getting it when its realsed here in Oct. PS..... why do some like to be rude, and disrespectful on here????? firstly, I dont understand why you would tell a message board that you would take a album back?? take it back, good. why the need to SAY it?? Or type it?? Thats stupid. are you trying to prove something?? I guess a lot of you guys dont listen to much music thats OUT there. Cos if you did, TCR would be a MASTERPIECE to your ears! Truly. There's MUCH to be said outside of TCR. I can go no forever, but I have a life. A great rock album, from 2 guys who love doing what they are doing, and I feel it thru this album. You guys need to chill. loosen up. |
QUEENROCKS_1991 27.09.2008 09:54 |
I like it bought 2 1 for the car 1 for indoor Those who dont like it never mind noone forced u to buy it :) |
beautifulsoup 27.09.2008 10:14 |
They allowed you to return a CD that was opened? |
Josh Henson 27.09.2008 10:46 |
The debate as to whether the album sucks or not or QPR for that matter, could go on forever. I do like the fact that Queen are still making music, even if it is with PR now, as that might be the only way they would do it, so I can accept that. BUT, when you think of the past creativity of Queen and compare it to this album, it falls extremely short. I am not comparing TCR to a Queen album at all while I'm listening to it. I am however listening to TCR as an album and it just sucks. Plain and simple. I don't expect TCR to sound like a Queen album, becuase they aren't Queen anymore, but musically and lyrically this album isn't that good. Face the facts. |
scottmax 27.09.2008 11:03 |
OOOOOOOOh. Sour!! |
Marcos Napier 27.09.2008 11:40 |
beautifulsoup wrote: The allowed you to return a CD that was opened?My thoughts as well. What is getting boring is the hate of both parts. We can do whatever we want and there is no law that forbids us to hate it neither there is one that says that if you are a "proper fan" you must buy it and build an althar just to worship it. Those who loved it should respect those who hated it and vice-versa. |
marcenciels 27.09.2008 12:02 |
hummmm... is this the review of a "depeche mode" kind of music lover ? |
Negative Creep 27.09.2008 12:11 |
Marcos Napier wrote:Well, seeing as the new album doesn't come sealed.....beautifulsoup wrote: The allowed you to return a CD that was opened?My thoughts as well. What is getting boring is the hate of both parts. We can do whatever we want and there is no law that forbids us to hate it neither there is one that says that if you are a "proper fan" you must buy it and build an althar just to worship it. Those who loved it should respect those who hated it and vice-versa. Anyway, you can return CDs that have been opened as long none of the packaging is damaged normally. |
Rick 27.09.2008 12:49 |
Mine was sealed. Both the CD and CD+DVD. |
KingMercury 27.09.2008 13:33 |
The Cosmos Rocks is a great album... If you dont like, ok, but you dont have to take it back to the shop and then post that fact on this board, just to show the other people how brave you are And no one is interested in your review (funny hoy many people, suddenly, posts reviews, like a music journalist) What the fuck you were expecting? A modern version of Boh Rhap? Hey, this is Queen+Paul Rodgers, another band, another sound And TCR is a great rock album... But you have to know a little bit of music, to call an album "crap" Im proud of the guys... They show us that they still can rock!!!!! |
bgordon88 27.09.2008 14:23 |
KingMercury wrote: The Cosmos Rocks is a great album... If you dont like, ok, but you dont have to take it back to the shop and then post that fact on this board, just to show the other people how brave you are And no one is interested in your review (funny hoy many people, suddenly, posts reviews, like a music journalist) What the fuck you were expecting? A modern version of Boh Rhap? Hey, this is Queen+Paul Rodgers, another band, another sound And TCR is a great rock album... But you have to know a little bit of music, to call an album "crap" Im proud of the guys... They show us that they still can rock!!!!!There jusy seem to be alot of people who are almost turning on Brian, Roger and Paul in a kind of personal way because they album does not meet their expectations. There is almost a "string em up" type attitude which I find strange in a fan forum. I guess the heresy here is using the Queen name but Freddie Mercury/Queen should not be used like a religion to breed hatred amongst people - how can that be right ? |
Tero 27.09.2008 14:39 |
bgordon88 wrote: There jusy seem to be alot of people who are almost turning on Brian, Roger and Paul in a kind of personal way because they album does not meet their expectations. There is almost a "string em up" type attitude which I find strange in a fan forum. I guess the heresy here is using the Queen name but Freddie Mercury/Queen should not be used like a religion to breed hatred amongst people - how can that be right ?Brian and Roger have decided to use the Queen name for their own marketing purposes, and now have to face the consequence of that decision... Which is the album being compared to previous Queen albums by the Queen fans, and some of the not liking what they hear. That's perfectly normal and healthy. I don't have much sympathy for anybody who wants the band to eat their cake and still have after they're finished, and that's pretty much what the excessively-positive QPR fans want. |
marcenciels 27.09.2008 14:41 |
look...to me this album is more like PR + Queen. Bad company style pretty much all over and i am not suprise. this album would be much better if it was a live album for most of the songs. to say it's a total crap ? no. there are 4 songs that are awfull to my taste,( call me ( THE WORST), through the night, warboys and surf"up... goes no where studio wise)...take those out and add 46664 instead ? cosmos rockin', small, c-lebraty & say it's not true...are the best thought out, worked and produced. i love these tracks. in the end...medium album...maybe a out-side help...like aerosmith got in their come back, would of brought on the chalenge between band members, that some think it's lacking ? the title of the album does not reflect enough the word ROCKS ! |
happiness? 16995 27.09.2008 16:10 |
clear wrote: 13 Surf’s Up, Schools Out – Jim Steinman (who wrote Meat Loaf’s most successful stuff) had a solo album called “Bad For Good”. The title track was used by Meat Loaf on his last album with Mr Brian May as guest guitarist. What a surprise that the original Jim Steinman album has a track called “Surf’s Up”. For good measure they’ve added the Alice Cooper title “School’s Out” and included some “Flash” style dialogue about weather warnings at the beginning.This is a really weak argument regarding the name of the song. Just because Brian has worked with Meat Loaf on a couple of occasions (Time for Heroes and Bad For Good) and Jim Steinman happened to write a song called "Surf's Up" (which in a bit of Meaty trivia he later covered on his 'Bad Attitude' album) doesn't mean Brian and the gang decided to take that name for their song. As for the use of 'School's Out' here's just a few songs with the same name: Magic Carpet Ride - Steppenwolf & Bardeux Fire - The Crazy World Of Arthur Brown, The Ohio Players, The Pointer Sisters Move Over - Janis Joplin & Steppenwolf Somebody To Love - Jefferson Airplane & Queen Stairway To Heaven - Neil Sedaka & Led Zeppelin One- U2, Metallica, Creed, The Bee Gees Slow Ride- The Beastie Boys & Foghat Dancing Fool- The Guess Who & Frank Zappa Last Resort- The Eagles and Papa Roach One of Us- Abba and Joan Osbourne They Don't Really Care About Us- Michael Jackson and Brandy Ok so I was bored! :-P |
Claudio_CQI 27.09.2008 16:45 |
QUEENROCKS_1991 wrote: I like it bought 2 1 for the car 1 for indoor Those who dont like it never mind noone forced u to buy it :)You're GREEEAT ! seriously I find ilarious the opening review in this therad, cos' I find TCR a good attempt for those "guys". After all who expected another RT & BM (half Queen, anyway) work at the age of 60s and after the hard to survive Fraddie loss. The Cosmos Rocks is a fairly collaboration with another musician called Paul Rodgers that knows how to work in music world. I find the album fine, not that fresh , not that revolutionary, but anyway is pleaseable rock n roll and blues rock set of songs. THANK YOU GUYS ! Yesterday in Rome was a breaking the floor with you ! ! The new stuff works the better live (even there was not too much pieces... unfortunately) and the old anthems are always greeeeeat ! For Milan's guys ..... SORRY SCUSATE SE VI ABBIAMO SPOMPATO UN PO' I VECCHIETTI IERI SERA .... ciao Claudio |
brENsKi 27.09.2008 17:44 |
bgordon88 wrote:There jusy seem to be alot of people who are almost turning on Brian, Roger and Paul in a kind of personal way because they album does not meet their expectations. There is almost a "string em up" type attitude which I find strange in a fan forum. I guess the heresy here is using the Queen name but Freddie Mercury/Queen should not be used like a religion to breed hatred amongst people - how can that be right ?"turning on" is a strong word to use...people are entitled to their opinion. just because YOU might loev ti....or love the sound of Brian farting in a jar...doesn;t mean aeveryone ahs to like it too |
mooghead 27.09.2008 19:01 |
Why is the Queen +PR stuff even being talked about on a QUEEN website? This isn't Queen, its an "I am trying to extract a few more pennies from the record buying public before I end up in an Alzheimer's home" attempt at cashing in former glories. It's very boring. And a little bit embarrassing. IMHO. |
mike hunt 28.09.2008 02:40 |
clear wrote: Ha ha, it does sound dramatic doesn't it. Here's why - a review I wrote when I first heard it... 1 Cosmos Rockin – The guitar just after the opening “What planet is this?” is a direct steal from the opening of “I Would Do Anything For Love” by Meat Loaf.The structure sounds like a Jeff Lynne (ELO) song . The backing vocals remind me of The Beasties Boys “Fight For Your Right To PAAAARTY” thing from the 80’s – “the policeman says Stop This Noise”.And don’t forget , this is the opener – supposedly designed to grab us. 2 Time To Shine – Oh shit, is he going to try a Mustapha… no wait…it’s turned into Pinball Wizard. The wailing chorus sounds like John Farnham. 3 Still Burnin – A dirge. I was trying to identify the middle 8 guitar sound and was listening to clips from NOTW and Jazz and it made me sad. The quality and originality of the those albums just pisses over this. And then, OH MY GOD, the WWRY drum/clap. Bloody hell, are you doing a new album or is it a tribue. Why Paul Rogers would allow that is a mystery. 4 Small – Is this an attempt at an “Imagine” (music, not lyrics). I quite like the melody. That fazy bit towards the end is also a bit ELO (I suppose it’s the cosmos connection – Jeff should claim royalties). 5 Warboys – The opening reminded me of “Freedom Train” from “Happiness” but when I listened to “FT” it just reminded me of “Liar” (the syncopated rhythm). After that initial interest it goes nowhere. Another sludgy mess. I know that PR is a respected singer etc but to me he sounds constipated and having a good strain on the bog. 6 We Believe – The start of this sounds like a cross between the song that opened the last tour (Reaching Out?) and a Clliff Richard Christmas number. Then Brian rips off the riff from “Leaving Home Ain’t Easy” (keep up you youngun’s). When it gets going those typical Queen block harmonies are so obviously missing Fred’s voice. And the lyrics…. Brian Ithink..have an animal rights element at the end. Good on you Brian. How did you get Roger “Countryside Alliance” to agree to that one? 7 Call Me – A playful Brian number (sort of “Let Your Heart Rule Your Head”). Paul is much too butch for this though and has to finish the track with a dismissive laugh (as if to say “what a crock”… indeed). 8 Voodoo – Just un-necessary indulgent wank. At least “See What A Fool I’ve Been” had Fred’s voice on it. 9 Some Things That Glitter – Another song that tries to create interest by bringing in the drums after the first chorus (“Small”). This is SO weak. 10 C-lebrity – Yes, the people you refer to in the lyric have nothing to offer – but, obviously, neither have you anymore. And this was the single!!!!!!!! Old, bitter men realising their time in the sun has gone. 11 Through The Night – By this time even the most ardent QPR apologist must be reaching for the asprin bottle. I can’t think of any occasion in life when I’d like to listen to this depressing rot. 12 Say It’s No True – My partner (who only knows Queens music through me) said “Isn’t this Roger’s solo thing. Of course he’s right. It’s a rip off of “Foreign Sand”. 13 Surf’s Up, Schools Out – Jim Steinman (who wrote Meat Loaf’s most successful stuff) had a solo album called “Bad For Good”. The title track was used by Meat Loaf on his last album with Mr Brian May as guest guitarist. What a surprise that the original Jim Steinman album has a track called “Surf’s Up”. For good measure they’ve added the Alice Cooper title “School’s Out” and included some “Flash” style dialogue about weather warnings at the beginning.I'v now listened to this Cd long enough to give my opinion about this brilliant piece of work by the boys, or not so brilliant. I'm surprised how many people like the first song 'cosmos rockin' the song is one of the worst opening songs I'v heard, almost embarrassing. Other songs I don't like are 'celebrity' through the night, 'surf's up...schools out' We believe is probably my least favorite song on the album. Warboys is the most queenie sounding song, and wasn't even written by brian or roger, sadly it's not a very good. The album does have some good songs, Voodoo is great, and small is a nice little ballad. Some things that glitter is probably my favorite song on the album, and is brians best written song for over a decade. I like about 5 songs out of 13. |
GonnaUseMyPrisoners 29.09.2008 22:50 |
Waaaaaaay back in the year "0001"... I bought David Bowie's "Heroes" LP and then sold it. I bought the Talking Heads' "Remain In Light" LP and sold it. I bought Jethro Tull's "Heavy Horses" LP and sold it. I later realized each awful error, one by one, and re-purchased all three classics. I now appreciate and even love all of them. Just because they weren't precisely what I EXPECTED didn't mean they each weren't great albums. Just because the artist's vision may have been lost on me initially doesn't mean they suck... or are, what did you say, "total toilet"? Amazing that you feel you can hurl insults like that at HUMAN members of a band who we all admire sufficiently to belong to a devoted messageboard. If you don't like it that's one thing, but to call it that name is out of line. It's too bad you didn't give the CD time to grow on you, honey, cuz it will. Oh, it will. Yeah, it will. |
inu-liger 30.09.2008 05:41 |
Negative Creep wrote:Marcos Napier wrote:Well, seeing as the new album doesn't come sealed..... Anyway, you can return CDs that have been opened as long none of the packaging is damaged normally.beautifulsoup wrote: The allowed you to return a CD that was opened?My thoughts as well. What is getting boring is the hate of both parts. We can do whatever we want and there is no law that forbids us to hate it neither there is one that says that if you are a "proper fan" you must buy it and build an althar just to worship it. Those who loved it should respect those who hated it and vice-versa. Heh, definitely not the case here in Canada (and I assume the US as well). Here, if you opened a product, you can only exchange it for the same product IF say there's a defect (as was the case with my Freddie Mercury Tribute DVD actually!), and within the time they give you from date of purchase on the receipt (eg. 2 weeks....really depends on stores). I did notice my CD copy of TCR didn't have a shrinkwrap seal around it, when I got it from Amazon UK (wouldn't be the first time I've gotten a new import CD come without shrinkwrap, but it always seems weird to me!) |
Micrówave 30.09.2008 12:15 |
Well, then count me in as an IMPROPER QUEEN FAN. Proper Queen fans are childish, snobby, immature, and smell like Gouda. And yes, I smell BS. What record shop lets you return an album simply because you didn't like it? Please give me a name, because I want to start doing all my shopping there. |
Reading Princess 30.09.2008 15:11 |
The shop that exchanged my CD was ZAVVI on Tottenham Court, London. And if they do it, so will the other ZAVVIs. I also specifically told the guy at the checkout that I was exchanging it because it was not worth the money. I exchanged it for an couple of other albums. I'm not sure if they would give you a refund. Anyway, don't take my word for it, give them a call. |
April 30.09.2008 15:26 |
Yes, I am also surprised at the policy of that shop! Maybe the shop is an imaginary one. You buy a cd, listen to it and then return it and get your money back. It's not even a rent-a-cd shop, where you would be charged a fee for using it. No, this is a shop which aims at giving away cds free. Maybe it's a charity shop? |
April 30.09.2008 15:30 |
Cosmos Rocks is a very good album, it's not very much rocky only because it has some slow, nice, beautiful melodies, that make it diverse. Which is a great advantage. Only rock would make it lop-sided and tasteless. |
Reading Princess 30.09.2008 16:57 |
Jeez, what else can I do - here's the phone number of the f...ing shop - 020 7631 1234. April, before making any more stupid posts call them and check for yourself. It's no wonder you like the crappy album if these posts are a fair example of your intelligence. |
Micrówave 30.09.2008 17:05 |
I just called that shop and spoke to a lovely lady name Marie. No, they don't accept open product returns without defect. I also asked if anyone had returned the new Queen CD because they didn't like it. She can't speak for everyone in the store, but there are no copies in their returns box, which they keep in the back room. Clear is clearly full of it. |
Micrówave 30.09.2008 17:09 |
UPDATED SCORE: Microwave 1 Clear 0 and from their website: We will not issue any refunds where the item has been removed from its sealed packaging. Source: link |
Micrówave 30.09.2008 18:50 |
I think he's gone. Let's delete his account while we're at it. All opposed: explain the thoery of relativity. |
mike hunt 01.10.2008 01:45 |
Micrówave wrote: I think he's gone. Let's delete his account while we're at it. All opposed: explain the thoery of relativity. your account should be deleted, why the hell do you care if he likes the cosmos rocks?....why do queen fans get so upset when fans hate on this album, but it's ok when these same idiots pile on hot space and the works. Get a life Microwave, not everyone likes this new album, Get over it! |
Saif 01.10.2008 04:36 |
Wow, people are still going on and on about this album. What irks me is not that people bad-mouth the album but they insinuate that Brian and Roger somehow committed a sin by making the album and shouldn't make music anymore. I don't like the album myself, but not because it doesn't 'sound like' Queen but because I think it's genuinely bad. I'm still glad that they made this album. It's nice to see Brian playing guitar for us once more, in the 'Queen name'. I don't understand why people waste time posting negative reviews here on QZ. If you really don't want people to buy the album, why not submit your "enlightening" review to Amazon.com or Allmusic.com? |
inu-liger 01.10.2008 04:56 |
Micrówave wrote: I just called that shop and spoke to a lovely lady name Marie. No, they don't accept open product returns without defect. I also asked if anyone had returned the new Queen CD because they didn't like it. She can't speak for everyone in the store, but there are no copies in their returns box, which they keep in the back room. Clear is clearly full of it. OWNED |
Negative Creep 01.10.2008 07:00 |
You seem to be forgetting than the Cosmos Rocks doesn't come sealed over here, like 90% of CDs. So... whatever. Also, products don't need to have any defects to be returned?! A shop over here will only refuse the return of a CD/DVD if it doesn't look like new (ie, booklets damaged/disc scratched) . Fucking hell. PS - Microwave... "We will not issue any refunds where the item has been removed from its sealed packaging" is fairly redundant when the chances of the person on the till knowing whether that particular product came sealed or not are slim to none. PPS - were you actually such a sad cunt that you rang the shop to try and prove clear wrong?! I don't believe you did for a minute... but..... if you did.... the joke's on you....hahaha |
john bodega 01.10.2008 08:55 |
I just played with my dick in front of some nuns on the bus. Man I hope I don't get arrested. |
Saif 01.10.2008 09:07 |
Haha |
Micrówave 01.10.2008 11:21 |
Negative Creep wrote: You seem to be forgetting than the Cosmos Rocks doesn't come sealed over here, like 90% of CDs. So... whatever. Also, products don't need to have any defects to be returned?! A shop over here will only refuse the return of a CD/DVD if it doesn't look like new (ie, booklets damaged/disc scratched) . Fucking hell. PS - Microwave... "We will not issue any refunds where the item has been removed from its sealed packaging" is fairly redundant when the chances of the person on the till knowing whether that particular product came sealed or not are slim to none. PPS - were you actually such a sad cunt that you rang the shop to try and prove clear wrong?! I don't believe you did for a minute... but..... if you did.... the joke's on you....hahaha Actually, I SPOKE to a female. Not just sent her messages on a forum board. You should try it sometime. And no, those 1-900 numbers don't count. I'm really pulling for you. Good luck. Let us know how it works out. |
Reading Princess 03.10.2008 21:49 |
"I just called that shop and spoke to a lovely lady name Marie. No, they don't accept open product returns without defect. I also asked if anyone had returned the new Queen CD because they didn't like it. She can't speak for everyone in the store, but there are no copies in their returns box, which they keep in the back room. Clear is clearly full of it" Microbrain, ZAVVI (as I'm sure a lot of London forum members will confirm) is a very big superstore. "Returns box" in the "back room" sounds like something from a record shop in Hicksville. Anyway. do you really think that my returned album would stilll be in the "Returns box" nearly 2 weeks after I returned it? Surely it would be back on the shelf (or, if damaged, back to the supplier). Did the "lovely lady Marie" go rooting in the "Returns box" while you were hanging on the phone? Anyone who has phoned ZAVVI with an enquiry knows that they are major busy and try to get you off the phone asap. For the benefit of London readers (if you don't know already) - ZAVVI will exchange, for another product, any un-damaged CD you take back within (I think) 4 weeks with your receipt. Microcock clearly is trying to make me out to be a liar and I would ask any other forum member in London to please back me up. Macrotwat - f...off and grow up. |
marcenciels 03.10.2008 22:11 |
where i'm from, there is ZÉRO RETURN !!!...unless proven defective or still wrapped. In the UK, don't you have the chance to listen to it, before buying it? this seems too loose and easy for pirates to copy at will. |
Reading Princess 04.10.2008 06:50 |
I agree. It is very easy to just copy and return but that's the way it is. It's possibly a legal requirement that needs to be changed. So if you want to, make the most of it before it is changed. I will find out more about this loophole. |
Reading Princess 04.10.2008 07:08 |
Microbrain....either "the lovely Marie" doesn't know her job or you are an outright liar. This is taken directly from ZAVVI's websight.... "Can I return a product if I don’t want it? You can return any unwanted products within 28 days . Please return to the address shown on the Despatch Note, making sure to fill out the 'Returns' section on the form and instructing us whether to refund or replace your item. The entire Despatch Note must be returned with the item so that we are able to identify your order and action your refund or replacement. " That refers to the online orders so it doesn't take much convincing to see it would be the same for a cd bought in store. As you can see it says "provided they are in perfect condition" NOT "only if damaged or faulty". |
Reading Princess 04.10.2008 07:24 |
Just to be clear, I found the ZAVVI "in store" returns policy on their website... "Store returns (i.e. not online) Purchases may be returned for an exchange if returned in their original condition within 28 days with a proof of purchase. We will not exchange multiple goods or previously exchanged goods. Please note that if the purchase was made using a credit/debit card, the cardholder must be present. Due to the problem of unlicensed copying, in some instances we reserve the right to refuse an exchange. Your statutory rights are not affected." I'm not sure how they decide about who may be involved with "unlicenses copying" but they have exchanged cds and dvds for me without wuestion. All you have to do is fill in a form with your name, address and signature and it's done. and just for good meassure here is HMV's policy (again copied directly from their website..... Unwanted Items Please note that we no longer offer an exchange service on unwanted items. If you wish to exchange your order, please return the item for a refund, and place an order yourself via hmv.com for the alternate item. We are happy to refund unwanted items that are returned to us within 21 days. Please send the items to the address below and enclose a note quoting your order number, and stating that the items are unwanted, and you require a refund. |
kingogre 04.10.2008 07:44 |
There are different rulse for return of on-line buys due to there being special laws. So what it says about those may very well not be valid for items bought over counter. |
Reading Princess 04.10.2008 07:58 |
KEEP UP Kingogre....read my last post... ZAVVI In-Store policy copied directly from their website. For God's sake what is wrong with you lot? Why would I say I'd had it exchanged if I hadn't? What would be the point? I copy and paste from the website and you still want to argue the toss. It's like trying to converse with retarded emus. |
Tero 04.10.2008 08:13 |
That is their whole point... You have a different opinion about the album, and the QPR fans are coming up with unrelated attempts of character assassination to undermine you as a person. It's much easier to discredit a person than just his personal opinion. |
kingogre 04.10.2008 09:21 |
Sorry missed that part. It was crammed in between all the on-line stuff. Too bad you didnt like the album, anyway. Better luck next time. Why do some of you become so upset by this? If I dont like a record I move on and listen to something else. |
Marcos Napier 04.10.2008 13:05 |
And that is what us "the haters" are doing, but it's a bit hard to listen to anything in the middle of all these flames and fire you fans threw us into for just disliking this new project. |
bhm0129ad 04.10.2008 13:38 |
Well, it's CLEAR you are a tosser, it's CLEAR you have lots of pent up rage in you and it's CLEAR you don't know how to communcate with real human beings. Or maybe it's just because you are safely behind a computer screen that you can be such an asshole. I don't care if you like the album or not, but you have made my blood boil just because of your childish, smug attitude and insulting people who ask questions because they're not inside your head and want to know more about what you mean. CLEARLY the returns policy issue is not the same everywhere in the world, but it don't stop you being the bully does it? Yes, I'm talking to you CLEAR. BUTTHOLE. Someone should take you back to the shop |
Marcos Napier 04.10.2008 15:31 |
Your signature would work better for this specific copy of TCR than taking it back to the store. |
April 04.10.2008 15:56 |
clear wrote: Jeez, what else can I do - here's the phone number of the f...ing shop - 020 7631 1234. April, before making any more stupid posts call them and check for yourself. It's no wonder you like the crappy album if these posts are a fair example of your intelligence. The fact that you don't like the album is an indicator of your low intelligence and poor knowledge of music. And your rude reaction to criticism shows how stupid and immature you are. Grow up first and then start listening to any music at all, baby. |
April 04.10.2008 15:58 |
bhm0129ad wrote: Well, it's CLEAR you are a tosser, it's CLEAR you have lots of pent up rage in you and it's CLEAR you don't know how to communcate with real human beings. Or maybe it's just because you are safely behind a computer screen that you can be such an asshole. I don't care if you like the album or not, but you have made my blood boil just because of your childish, smug attitude and insulting people who ask questions because they're not inside your head and want to know more about what you mean. CLEARLY the returns policy issue is not the same everywhere in the world, but it don't stop you being the bully does it? Yes, I'm talking to you CLEAR. BUTTHOLE. Someone should take you back to the shop Perfect post!!! I support it. But Clear has clearly shut up. |
marcenciels 04.10.2008 16:07 |
Bof ! if bad company is not your cup of tea...you will not or little appreciate this LP. forget the name...a generation gap could be in some cases here, a issus in taste of trade. |
bhm0129ad 05.10.2008 10:18 |
Well, I suppose, In CLEAR's defense, it was FREDDIE who said~: " LISTEN TO IT, THEN THROW IT AWAY" about Queen's records. Maybe Clear just took it a little to literally and dedcided to profit instead.... |
Reading Princess 05.10.2008 14:37 |
bhm0129ad wrote: Well, it's CLEAR you are a tosser, it's CLEAR you have lots of pent up rage in you and it's CLEAR you don't know how to communcate with real human beings. Or maybe it's just because you are safely behind a computer screen that you can be such an asshole. I don't care if you like the album or not, but you have made my blood boil just because of your childish, smug attitude and insulting people who ask questions because they're not inside your head and want to know more about what you mean. CLEARLY the returns policy issue is not the same everywhere in the world, but it don't stop you being the bully does it? Yes, I'm talking to you CLEAR. BUTTHOLE. Someone should take you back to the shop I made it clear that the returns policy I was refering to was at a particular store (ZAVVI in Tottenham Court Road, London). Pointing that out with phone numbers of the store and clips from their website are all I can do to prove what I said was true. If someone then so blatently lies and spouts off like a really thick idiot I will respond. All I have done is present the honest (verifiable) FACTS. I'd love to understand your definition of "bully". I would have thought that ganging up on one poster is bullying. Some airhead QPR worshipers simply can't get their heads around the fact that either a) some Queen fans think that the album is crap or b) the album is in fact a scandalous waste of time and money by all concerned. When someone then clearly explains why it is rubbish (as I have done in earlier posts) they realise that they have been wasting their time and money and get angry. Angry at themselves. Then re-direct that anger to people like me. |
Reading Princess 05.10.2008 14:54 |
April wrote: The fact that you don't like the album is an indicator of your low intelligence and poor knowledge of music. And your rude reaction to criticism shows how stupid and immature you are. Grow up first and then start listening to any music at all, baby. Ha ha ha.This post is classic. Listen April. some of the most respected music journalists in the world HATE this album and some very well known music mags haven't even bothered to review it. (Anyone seen a review in "Q" the top UK music mag?) Of course your response will be to say that it doesn't matter. However, one good review and you'd be shouting it from the rooftops wouldn't you? The reviews would matter then. The "poor knowledge of music" accusation I responded to on Queen Online to someone else so I won't list my qualifications here. If I have appeared rude, it's through frustration at people like YOU ignoring my offers of info to back up my posts or, worse, shamelessly LYING to try to make me out as dishonest. I will take it on the chin that I can be rude but YOU April are a liar. Give me rude anytime. |
bhm0129ad 06.10.2008 08:11 |
I'm not abgry at myself, nor do I regret buying the album, or anything with the Queen name on it, I just find your review to be chidish and ignorant, and your treatment of the responses to it just the same. YOU are a bully and you deserve to be 'ganged up on' as you seem to think your opinion is the be all and end all just becuase YOU feel some critics agree with you. Well, I like the album and I'm sure ( if I could be bothered) I could find a review or two to back me up too, but I don't need to cite any body else to feel that my vioce is valid, nor do I feel the need the quote untold rubbish to make my point. You only needed to say in the very first place that you didn't like it, and took it back to the shop. You didn't need to make it feel personal with those scathing remarks in your 'review' and you didn't need to be so horrible to the people who didn't believe you regarding ZAVVI as the concept is obviously alien to these people- most of whom live abroad and would be laughed at at their local record store if they asked for a refund/exchange. I got personal in my response to you because your words made me angry and your attitude stunk majorly, and I feel many, many posters would agree... Even those who dislike the album would agree with my words as they are about YOU. |
bhm0129ad 06.10.2008 08:17 |
IUt's using words like Scandalous that bring you down CLEAR, as you make it sound like you were forced to but the album and that it ate your dog when you got it home. You are PERFECTLY entitled to dislike the album, and NO FUCKING BODY is trying to deny you that right just by dis-agreeing with you. It's the tone you use and the fact you are personally insulting the band ALL OF US HERE love by insinuating they made a seriously bad album just to get YOUR money. For your info, the rest of us are, in fact, entitled to like the album, the bands line up and anythinhg else we choose to like, and we are also entitles to think of you as a twat. |
monty-- 06.10.2008 17:21 |
*smile* |
April 07.10.2008 14:47 |
Learn your lesson, Clear : Be respectful and people will treat you respectively! |
Tero 07.10.2008 15:22 |
April wrote: Learn your lesson, Clear : Be respectful and people will treat you respectively! ...And translated to English this means you can either keep your negative thoughts to yourself, or you will be insulted by the "believers" for daring to have a different opinion. |
bhm0129ad 07.10.2008 15:27 |
NO TERO, If you had bothered reading all the posts in tis thread, you will see that CLEAR is being critisised for his MANNER and ATTITUDE, NOT his opinion READ BEFORE YOU REPLY |
Tero 07.10.2008 23:44 |
bhm0129ad wrote: "NO TERO, If you had bothered reading all the posts in tis thread, you will see that CLEAR is being critisised for his MANNER and ATTITUDE, NOT his opinion READ BEFORE YOU REPLY" NO, b, that is 100% what April is NOT saying. This is from his/her previous post to clear: "The fact that you don't like the album is an indicator of your low intelligence and poor knowledge of music" It's obvious there is an issue with clear's opinion, not his manner or attitude. |
April 08.10.2008 15:42 |
bhm0129ad wrote: NO TERO, If you had bothered reading all the posts in tis thread, you will see that CLEAR is being critisised for his MANNER and ATTITUDE, NOT his opinion READ BEFORE YOU REPLY This is what I meant. bhm0129ad is absolutely right! It is the way you treat other posters that you youself are treated. |
Tero 08.10.2008 23:52 |
April dear, other people insulting you is NOT an excuse for you to stoop down to their level, let alone go way below it. If I had written "The fact that you like the Cosmos Rocks album is an indicator of your low intelligence and poor knowledge of music. Grow up and then start listening to any music at all, baby." there would have been a dozen QPR supporters ganging up on me for expecting everybody to share my negative opinion. That kind of a comment deserves to be picked apart and ridiculed for its stupidity, but of course it isn't going to happen to YOUR quote because your quote was a pro-QPR comment. |
john bodega 09.10.2008 06:24 |
I like this. Clear points out that TCR hasn't been reviewed in a 'top UK music mag'. First of all it's an oxymoron; I wouldn't use the average music magazine to wipe my arse, so it's hard to imagine there's a pecking order. Second; music magazines are almost a paradox in themselves. The mindless turds who read the things are surely too dull to read in the first place; what's going on? Maybe it's just the pretty pictures that sell! |
April 09.10.2008 06:29 |
Tero, dear, calm down! Clear was just rude and he knows it, that's why he stays low. Forget about him. And i was wondering why you were so much concerned about Clear? It is because you feel offended, you want fairness, you want your voice to be heard. So, I understand you, you don't like the album, you prefer another kind of music. That's very sad cause the guys are former Queen members, but there is nothing to be done. Tastes differ. You've detached yourself from the two of them. Your heart doesn't welcome their new music. Sad, so sad... |
Tero 09.10.2008 06:50 |
April wrote: Tero, dear, calm down! Clear was just rude and he knows it, that's why he stays low. Forget about him. And i was wondering why you were so much concerned about Clear? It is because you feel offended, you want fairness, you want your voice to be heard. So, I understand you, you don't like the album, you prefer another kind of music. That's very sad cause the guys are former Queen members, but there is nothing to be done. Tastes differ. You've detached yourself from the two of them. Your heart doesn't welcome their new music. Sad, so sad... It isn't Clear I'm concerned about rather than the complete disregard you have for people who disagree with you. You can try to rationalise it anyway you want, but in all it's simplicity you think anybody who doesn't like The Cosmos Rocks album doesn't know anything about music. hanks for being so open to different opinions! There's no reason for you to be sad. The Queen members are free to make any music they want, and the audience is free to have personal opinions about it. If they make music I don't like, it means only that and nothing more. I haven't "detached myself from the two of them", and I don't just "welcome their new music". That's you again trying to sweep under the rug the issue that not everybody likes their music. |
April 09.10.2008 08:22 |
Tero, you don't like their music, i accept that fact. Why should you repeat it again? I I didn't contradict your statement. But the consequence is that you don't accept the 2 guys, cause it is they who write this music. It can't be that you don't like the music but you do like the authors??? This is nonsense. It is not a beauty contest to like somebody's looks and they are not your friends to like their behaviour. We chose the singers because we like their creation: music. So, if you turn away from music you turn away from the authors, Brian and Roger. That is why it is sad. |
RoyalCarlito 10.10.2008 07:46 |
People say CLEAR is a tosser and that he LIES when he says he took TCR back to the shop and got his money back.[br][br]I say he is telling the TRUTH.[br][br]Why?[br][br]Because taking a CD back to a shop and demanding your money back is EXACTLY what a tosser would do.[br][br]No offence. |
Marcos Napier 10.10.2008 11:20 |
But the consequence is that you don't accept the 2 guys, cause it is they who write this music. It can't be that you don't like the music but you do like the authors??? This is nonsense I am confused here. I think they (Brian, Roger AND Paul) were always "accepted". So was their work, the music. We aren't rejecting anything, I guess most of us (hardcore fans or not) were expecting something wonderful, and unfortunately for some of us, it didn't happen, hence the "rejection". It's not "rejection" or lack of acceptance though. We are just saying that what they are doing now is different (and worse, for some of us) from what they can do (a guess, really) and from what they did when we used to "accept" them according to your thoughts. We don't (well some do...) want to zap Brian and Roger in an electric chair for this. |
April 10.10.2008 16:49 |
Marcos Napier wrote:I am confused here. I think they (Brian, Roger AND Paul) were always "accepted". So was their work, the music. We aren't rejecting anything, I guess most of us (hardcore fans or not) were expecting something wonderful, and unfortunately for some of us, it didn't happen, hence the "rejection". It's not "rejection" or lack of acceptance though. We are just saying that what they are doing now is different (and worse, for some of us) from what they can do (a guess, really) and from what they did when we used to "accept" them according to your thoughts. We don't (well some do...) want to zap Brian and Roger in an electric chair for this.But the consequence is that you don't accept the 2 guys, cause it is they who write this music. It can't be that you don't like the music but you do like the authors??? This is nonsense Ok. Do you mean you still consider them to be great musicians but you don't like their creation? If you don'tlike their creation it means you don't like them as musicians. What is the reason now for you to think they are great rockers? Their looks or what? Please, explain. I don't understand. What is your attitude to them? |
Marcos Napier 10.10.2008 17:59 |
Ok. Do you mean you still consider them to be great musicians but you don't like their creation? If you don'tlike their creation it means you don't like them as musicians. What is the reason now for you to think they are great rockers? Their looks or what? Please, explain. I don't understand. What is your attitude to them? Yes I don't like their most recent creation. According to your (strange) logic, does it mean that if an artist suddenly releases the worst piece of art ever in his/her career (be it a musician, a painter, a writer, doesn't matter), and if you say you didn't like it, you are just throwing all this artist's legacy (key word here!) in the garbage can and starting to dislike him immediately? I am not. I am not burning all my Queen CDs and will never "dislike" Queen, just because of a bad move or because I don't like what's written in the credits of a CD booklet or something irrelevant like that or like TCR. They aren't gods, and they are allowed to make mistakes. Just as we are. |
splicksplack 10.10.2008 21:32 |
|
April 11.10.2008 17:17 |
MN, I got you. You are giving them another chance, so to speak. |
Marcos Napier 11.10.2008 17:33 |
Not really that (although they deserve as many "chances" as they wish I guess), I just think that they don't have to be condemned for what they are doing (even if it's too far from what some of us wished), neither those who dislike it should burn in hell as well. I bet some of us would have taken some albums back to the shop, if you could disregard the sentimental reasons...[br] |
April 11.10.2008 17:41 |
Ok, I understand you. You've expected something more. But as for me, i absolutely can't think of anything better to listen to just now. All is so poor and dull. Only Cosmos Rocks is shining... |
Marcos Napier 12.10.2008 16:33 |
Well that's another point to be added and we are getting a little more rational here at last. If TCR stands out compared with releases of the same style (are there any?) or even others, it's a different story. But what we do is mostly compare it to Queen releases, for the obvious reason that it is sold as Queen (Queen +, but still Queen), and the differences are too many to be quoted every time. I myself think despite that not liking TCR that it is much better than Chinese Democracy for example (or what has leaked of it so far), which also sounds boring. It is a good hard rock album, compared to the recent releases? Maybe. It's a good GNR album? No way. |
The Rik 12.10.2008 16:56 |
Let's all respect one another. I bought the album, nobody forced me into it. I was disappointed, but that's the risk with any album. Been an active fan now for thirty years and I think taking this album back to the shop is both brave and brilliant! And funny, ofcourse! I just consider it to be a thing to keep the official collection complete... And if QPR can make a living out of that -if they would need it anyway- I can live with that all the way. They've tried, they've failed, I've got a new album. That's all! |
April 12.10.2008 17:08 |
I don't think it's fair to compare the album with old Queen releases. It can't be anything of the kind, first of all cause the 2 members are missing, and a new one is introduced. Some shifts are inevitable. And as for me i think they didn't fail with the album, they managed to maintain the high quality of the production and live up to the expectations of the fans, most fans. I love Freddie very much, i think he is the best ever singer, musician, artist on Earth. When i see his early (I especially love early) pics or videos i get overwhelmed with emotions and every time it happens i realize how much i love him and always will. So when i learned about the guys' colaboration with Paul, their writing music, forming a band, touring, I couldn't believe it, it seemed too incredible to be true. "Queen again, revived, living, breathing?" - I thought. Fantastic, at last! How happy Freddie would have been learning about it! I believe he would! Now there's a band for me to love and to listen to, and to think about Freddie... |
Micrówave 14.10.2008 14:58 |
This is still going? The Rik (love your ESPN commercials, by the way) said: Let's all respect one another. I bought the album, nobody forced me into it. I was disappointed, but that's the risk with any album. Been an active fan now for thirty years and I think taking this album back to the shop is both brave and brilliant! And funny, ofcourse! Well, I submit to you that the topic starter is the one disrespecting us, disrespectful for we who like Cosmos Rocks. What was the point of his creative fiction, other than to stir things up? First off, anyone who "takes an album back" because they didn't like it is an idiot in the first place. It's not brave. It's not brilliant. It's an idiot who bought something without looking into it. There are all kinds of places physical and here on the internet where he could have listened to it FOR FREE. Why would he just go buy it unknowing? Because he's an idiot. I still don't think he took it back. Is this how he buys his cars? his insurance? his house payment? his cell phone bill? Don't most people check things out prior to purchase? I guess if he didn't like Crunch Berries, he'd take those back to the grocery store then, yes? That would sure show Captain Crunch!!! |
Knute 14.10.2008 15:08 |
Brave and brilliant? Talking an album back?(supposedly) Man you have some low standards. LMAO! Why stop there? Might as well consider it heroic and revolutionary |
Micrówave 14.10.2008 15:54 |
Yes, if CLEAR was around back then, William Wallace might not have been defeated. I know CLEAR would fight for Scotland. I'd be peeing my pants like the rest of everyone who likes one second of Cosmos Rocks. We are cowards. |
breakthru50 16.10.2008 16:10 |
I personally love TCR album. Easily my favourite album of the year so far and it just gets better with every listen. I really wasn't sure they could pull it off, but by golly they have! Fantastic to have them back!! [img=/images/smiley/msn/teeth_smile.gif][/img] |
bst123 22.10.2008 18:34 |
If you see Q+PR as a new band or a spin-off from the old ones (Queen, Bad Company etc.) i think it's ok. I mean they obviously don't do it for the money and the shows are still very good, even if you compare them with some newer acts, they still deliver and are great musicians in their own right.I enjoy the Q+PR concerts and like the new album but for me the magic has disappeared. I think a lot of fans think the same way, Queen was something special. Maybe it's also a age thing but i like to remember Queen like they were. It has nothing to do with Paul Rodgers (great singer) or Brian and Roger doing a kind of fan-service for a lot of younger people who got involved in Queen and never had the change to see them live in their heydays. But there is a huge difference between Q+PR and Queen as a lot of people loved or hated them. I'm still a kind of fan but i lost some interest in Queen as Q+PR. For me a Brian or Roger solo tour/album would be far more interesting. I would like some new solo material from them. For example, look at Mark Knopfler, he quit Dire Straits and if you like him or not he's doing all kinds of solo-projects and solo tours with here and there some old Dire Straits songs. I think that's the way you(they) should do it, it's more graceful and interesting then singing the same old songs over and over again. To quote Freddie Mercury "my songs are like disposable razors, you use them and throw them away". I think they also made a new album as Q+PR because without it they would be a super classic rock band from the past delivering Queen, Bad Company and Free songs. And yes, Queen always tried new things, but without the other half of Queen the chemistry is gone and we are left with just a good rock/blues/ballad record with some little references/trademarks from the past, nothing more. That's my opinion on TCR, it's not bad but you cant compare Queen albums with Q+PR. |
Reading Princess 23.10.2008 19:38 |
Micrówave wrote: This is still going? The Rik (love your ESPN commercials, by the way) said: Let's all respect one another. I bought the album, nobody forced me into it. I was disappointed, but that's the risk with any album. Been an active fan now for thirty years and I think taking this album back to the shop is both brave and brilliant! And funny, ofcourse! Well, I submit to you that the topic starter is the one disrespecting us, disrespectful for we who like Cosmos Rocks. What was the point of his creative fiction, other than to stir things up? First off, anyone who "takes an album back" because they didn't like it is an idiot in the first place. It's not brave. It's not brilliant. It's an idiot who bought something without looking into it. There are all kinds of places physical and here on the internet where he could have listened to it FOR FREE. Why would he just go buy it unknowing? Because he's an idiot. I still don't think he took it back. Is this how he buys his cars? his insurance? his house payment? his cell phone bill? Don't most people check things out prior to purchase? I guess if he didn't like Crunch Berries, he'd take those back to the grocery store then, yes? That would sure show Captain Crunch!!! Well Microwave, I bought it because I was under the desperately wrong impression that two of the members of the band (that I've followed since 1973/4) may have done something brilliant. After all this live QPR shit, I still (somehow) had faith. I agree it's not "brave" or "brilliant" to take an album back. I can only describe the experience of taking the QPR album back as, essentially. upsetting. Not that I'd expect you to understand that. All you seem to want to do is attack me for my, obviously, superior understanding of the true essece of Queen (i.e. with Freddie Mercury - there is no other Queen). And you compare buying a CD with "cars, insurance and house payments"? You idiot. Your references to "Crunch Berries" and "Captain Crunch" just further proves your ignorance. Why use those references on a world-wide forum? You assume that the whole world is familiar with your counrty's trashy food and adverts? Climb back into the "trash" can. With your QPR CD. |
rhyeking 23.10.2008 22:44 |
"All you seem to want to do is attack me for my, obviously, superior understanding of the true essece of Queen (i.e. with Freddie Mercury - there is no other Queen)." See, dude, when you express yourself like this, you invite attack. You've said you're understanding of the essence of Queen is superior to the rest of our respective understandings. People are going to take exception to this. This argument over what is Queen, with Freddie dead and John retired, is sad and exhausted. There are fans who want Brian and Roger to keep working and don't care what they call themselves as long as they make music. There are fans who want Brian and Roger to keep working, but to let the Queen name rest in peace. The first group, who don't care, understand the other group's position. They disagree, but they understand. The other group, the "No Freddie + No John = No Queen" group, can't for the life of them understand why the Don't Care group, well, doesn't care that Queen ain't Queen anymore and yet the name is still being used. Their view of what Queen is, the "essence," is so exact and specific and so defines their view of the world that any other view, even the view of the very people they are fans of, is flawed and beneath them. Their arguments begin with "Freddie died. That's it for Queen." Then they progress to "Brian, Roger and John said there was no Queen without Freddie. Now they're hypocrites." After that, it moves to "The new product sucks, [insert "+ collaborator's" name here] is ruining Queen's legacy." And the last step is usually self-righteous indignation at all who oppose him or her (symptoms include insults and a superiority complex). One of the things that makes us human is the very ability to hold dear two completely conflicting ideas or moral positions, both intellectually and emotionally. We reconcile these differences by ignoring them or selectively applying them. That's not hypocrisy, that's human nature. We like to think our world is black and white (that I will do this, but never do that), but honestly, most of the time it's not. What Queen is and what Queen isn't (or what isn't Queen) is trying to deal in absolutes, to make a grey situation black and white. It never was (even when the four members we love were working together) and never will be so exact a thing. My question to all of you, on both sides of the fence, is: what do you want out of all this? Brian and Roger are going to keep using Queen as their band's name whether you like it not, because it's their band! They know they can't make everyone happy, but that's never been a priority, just a pleasant by-product of their work. They don't need your happiness in order to look themselves in the mirror everyday. Oh, and superiority complexes won't guilt them into doing what you want. My answer to my own question, what I want, is an end to the griping. Agree to disagree and move on. |
Micrówave 24.10.2008 14:55 |
That and have idiots like "clear" wiped from existance before he starts some stupid thread about Queen toys or something... |
marcenciels 24.10.2008 17:16 |
expressing via the internet any claim of being superior thru deception is... not even worth bragging about ? |
bhm0129ad 25.10.2008 09:15 |
At the end of the day, I fell for it and so didi the rest of you, but CLEAR is a TROLL, and that's that. All he wants to do is wind us all up, and get the attention he has got for the last SIX pages, and so, with that in mind, I hereby consign him to the anals of history.. And I think anals is a great word for where he belongs. My last word on the subject. |
CJNovello 31.10.2008 19:02 |
it's not the queen i know and love, i actually can't listen to it all the way through and there are no Brian, Roger vocal tracks ??? i live in Australia and there is no mention at all about this release and no radio airplay either after listening to TCR i really felt the need to hear Freddie's voice I miss Freddie Mercury now more than ever :( |
Winter Land Man 01.11.2008 20:01 |
Let's rock her cosmo!!! |
Sportzfan76 02.11.2008 15:52 |
IMO - The music is interesting and diverse. They could have spent a bit more time on the lyrics. Even though freddie always thouht that lyrics were disposable.... The album is good but it is no "Snakes & Arrows" - that's for sure. |
joe90 03.11.2008 03:19 |
After giving TCR a fair shot, there are definitley songs i like, and songs, imo, they should have kept on the shelf. I find i'm skipping the same songs now. My listening order goes somethin like 1. Cosmos Rocks 2. 3. 4. Small 5. 6. We Believe 7. Call Me 8. 9. Some Things That Glitter 10. C-Lebrity 11. 12. Say Its Not True 13. 14. So 7 hits, 7 misses for me. Thats a better strike rate than a lot of new records i've listened to, so my verdict is that it's hardly the stuff of classic records, but definitely not as bad as some people make out. |
brians wig 03.11.2008 03:56 |
After 6 weeks, I felt I had to take my copy back to the shop as well. They refused to give me a new one, insisting that the reason it didn't play anymore is because I'd worn it out [img=/images/smiley/msn/teeth_smile.gif][/img] |
john bodega 03.11.2008 05:43 |
I did one better; I took someone elses copy back to the shop. No reason. |
Micrówave 03.11.2008 12:06 |
I took a copy of TCR back to the shop and robbed it instead. I held 34 people hostage and forced them to listen to TCR while I emptied the registers. 23 of those 34 people actually LIKED The Cosmos Rocks and agreed to purchase it as soon as I left. We shot up the Jonas Brothers section pretty good but made the manager clean up TCR display and mark them on sale. |
john bodega 03.11.2008 12:08 |
I'm officially beating Clear's ass here. I took Kid Rock back to his parents. Beat that, original poster. |
April 03.11.2008 14:19 |
joe90 wrote: After giving TCR a fair shot, there are definitley songs i like, and songs, imo, they should have kept on the shelf. I find i'm skipping the same songs now. My listening order goes somethin like 1. Cosmos Rocks 2. 3. 4. Small 5. 6. We Believe 7. Call Me 8. 9. Some Things That Glitter 10. C-Lebrity 11. 12. Say Its Not True 13. 14. So 7 hits, 7 misses for me. Thats a better strike rate than a lot of new records i've listened to, so my verdict is that it's hardly the stuff of classic records, but definitely not as bad as some people make out. Wow! I agree with that choice, only I would add Through The Night to the fav list. And I also agree that it's much better than any new record released now. |
Holly2003 03.11.2008 16:05 |
I took TCR back to the shop and all I got was this lousy t-shirt. |
April 03.11.2008 17:02 |
Holly2003 wrote: I took TCR back to the shop and all I got was this lousy t-shirt. I would continue: with Paul McCartney. |
boca 06.11.2008 10:39 |
clear wrote: Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead). well, i think you made a mistake. i'm not fan of paul rodgers also, but album is not bad at all, that you have to took it back to the shop. also, it shows that you don't respect Brian and Roger |
Hitman 09.11.2008 07:10 |
Don't forget, if you are an proper Queen fan and still feel the need to buy the new stuff masquarading as Queen, you don't have to put up with crap. I am proud to say that I was true to my inner voice and went back to ZAVVI in London and told them I wanted my money back. The Cosmos Rocks is total toilet. (I filled up a couple of holes in my Thin Lizzy collection instead). loser: the cosmos rocks values at least 3 thin lizzies!!!!!! they ripped you off :P |
Knute 09.11.2008 09:50 |
I took TCR back to the shop because they forgot to put mayo on it. |
Libor2 11.11.2008 06:18 |
Return of the QPR CD back to the shop is very brave and it truly required a lot of courage from (all of) you. And, of course, it was necessary to say the story of this heroic action to the whole world. Bravo! |
Micrówave 09.12.2008 11:31 |
Ah, it's Mr. Took the Box Set back to the shop |
Saint Jiub 09.12.2008 21:43 |
Micrówave wrote: Ah, it's Mr. Took the Box Set back to the shop Ah, it's Mr. Sensitive Stepford who revives a month old thread because he cannot stand anyone critcizing TCR. |
lalaalalaa 09.12.2008 22:46 |
I don't see why Queen fans are so upset with the Cosmos Rocks. It's really a shame because it's a good album. I guess some Queen fans don't want to actually give it a fair chance. These Queen fans would be more like "Freddie fans" than "Queen fans." Anyways, now that I'm saying this I might as well list my favorite songs off the album (in no order): The Cosmos Rocks Time To Shine Small Warboys We Believe Some Things That Glitter C-lebrity Say It's Not True Still Burnin' |
inu-liger 10.12.2008 22:32 |
The reason those "Queen fans" love to bash TCR? Because they're trolls with personal, horribly stressful lives for whatever reason(s) - maybe work sucks or whatever -, that *KNOW* this bashing gets on our nerves, and so do take out their stress on us for that reason, cos it'll satisfy them in the end with all the anger they've channelled unto others that way :-) * They in reality secretly like the album, even if it may not be up to their personal 'standards' (ha!), but are too 'brave' to admit it in the meantime. *As Greg Brooks so duly pointed out many times, it's too easy to say *ANYTHING* from the (false) 'security' of your private, personal computer screen. In real life, it's a totally different situation, guaranteed. |
Ken8 12.12.2008 01:45 |
inu-liger wrote: The reason those "Queen fans" love to bash TCR? Because they're trolls with personal, horribly stressful lives for whatever reason(s) Or they could just think it's a poor album that hasn't sold either. Or perhaps they've been around long enough to finally see Queen get the serious recognition they deserve only to have it damaged by a couple of the remaining members egos........ |
inu-liger 12.12.2008 03:51 |
Ken8 wrote:inu-liger wrote: The reason those "Queen fans" love to bash TCR? Because they're trolls with personal, horribly stressful lives for whatever reason(s)Or they could just think it's a poor album that hasn't sold either. Or perhaps they've been around long enough to finally see Queen get the serious recognition they deserve only to have it damaged by a couple of the remaining members egos........ link |
Marcos Napier 12.12.2008 20:39 |
*As Greg Brooks so duly pointed out many times, it's too easy to say *ANYTHING* from the (false) 'security' of your private, personal computer screen. In real life, it's a totally different situation, guaranteed. What should we haters do? Post an Youtube video saying how much we hate it? Write letters (handwritten, e-mails will be ignored) to Brian's house? I even gave a second chance to TCR, downloading it again (sorry, I won't buy it). It's lost in the digital space right now, couldn't go past song #3 again. |
john bodega 12.12.2008 21:26 |
I accept that I probably have stacks of naivety in this area, but I don't see how TCR can damage Queen's legacy or reputation - in the eyes of an intelligent person, at least. Queen's legacy is set in stone; those albums, live recordings and songs aren't going anywhere. One can easily choose to ignore everything they did after a certain point; if 'the public' were to suddenly see Queen as a joke just because of some bad collaborations in the years 1992-2008, then big deal. For what it's worth, I don't think that's happened. Where I live, people don't even know there was a new Queen album. Get a new promotional team, Brian... |
inu-liger 12.12.2008 22:19 |
Marcos Napier wrote:*As Greg Brooks so duly pointed out many times, it's too easy to say *ANYTHING* from the (false) 'security' of your private, personal computer screen. In real life, it's a totally different situation, guaranteed.What should we haters do? Post an Youtube video saying how much we hate it? Write letters (handwritten, e-mails will be ignored) to Brian's house? I even gave a second chance to TCR, downloading it again (sorry, I won't buy it). It's lost in the digital space right now, couldn't go past song #3 again. You haters should stop polluting our attempts at having civil, mature topics where we want to talk *POSITIVELY* about Q+PR and their album, for starters. Most of us are sick and tired of you assholes doing that. Stick to your own damn vile topics for fuck sakes. Or does the Church of Freddie forbid that? |
Saint Jiub 13.12.2008 12:46 |
???? Stick to your own damn vile topics for fuck sakes. ???? This an anti-TCR thread ... evidently you are the invader in this topic. Personally I think that TCR is just OK, but it certainly doesn't find "Time to Shine". However, compared to the Flash Gordon Soundtrack or the Freddie Mercury Album, TCR is a timeless classic. |
Flush_Gurdun 13.12.2008 16:03 |
Panchgani wrote: ???? Stick to your own damn vile topics for fuck sakes. ???? This an anti-TCR thread ... evidently you are the invader in this topic. Personally I think that TCR is just OK, but it certainly doesn't find "Time to Shine". However, compared to the Flash Gordon Soundtrack or the Freddie Mercury Album, TCR is a timeless classic. Ha Ha... good point... maybe inu-l should have read the topic heading first! As for FG and the FMA... these are both superior to TCR IMO. TCR isn't worth taking back to the shops... that's a bit extreme tho. It's an alright album that PR, BM and RT have got together and made. I'll be honest, I have only listened to it twice and only liked a handful of songs. They sounded better live IMO. By using the name Queen you are going to have fans compare to past endeavors... the guys prob new this all along... they also must know Freddie is bigger than them all put together solely because his death has made him a legend... even if the album was amazing folk would still have said it's not a patch on ANATO... or Freddie would have given the songs that extra bit of magic. It's funny that fans here are still blasting this album though. This album brought about another tour... and I was lucky enough to see Queen tour for the first time in my life after being addicted to their music for nearly 20 years, so if the decide to make another and then tour again... GO FOR IT. |
Raf 13.12.2008 16:56 |
Marcos Napier wrote:*As Greg Brooks so duly pointed out many times, it's too easy to say *ANYTHING* from the (false) 'security' of your private, personal computer screen. In real life, it's a totally different situation, guaranteed.What should we haters do? Post an Youtube video saying how much we hate it? Write letters (handwritten, e-mails will be ignored) to Brian's house? I even gave a second chance to TCR, downloading it again (sorry, I won't buy it). It's lost in the digital space right now, couldn't go past song #3 again. How about skipping it and checking the rest of the songs then? Did you also miss them here in Brazil just because of your silly Mercurism? I'd dare to say the Rio gig was the best we've had in years and years - that is, if the fans who attended all concerts here hadn't mentioned the gigs in São Paulo were even better! |
Marcos Napier 13.12.2008 18:24 |
How about skipping it and checking the rest of the songs then?Again, for the N-th time: why buy an album just for pity or nostalgia and sentimental reasons? I didn't like it, so I won't buy it, simple as that. It will save me a trip back to the store to return it. Interesting how people bash the singles collection because they don't want to change discs all the time - but why listen to an album with the remote in your hand skipping songs? Did you also miss them here in Brazil just because of your silly Mercurism? I'd dare to say the Rio gig was the best we've had in years and years - that is, if the fans who attended all concerts here hadn't mentioned the gigs in São Paulo were even better! No, I missed them because I'm not stupid enough to pay R$ 900 (roughly $450 back then) for a ticket plus expenses of a trip to Rio or SP for a day the most in a hotel in a business day because of a really uninteresting and hyped concert with songs that although I love them a lot (well the classics at least, TCR excluded) can be much more well performed by certain pub bands than they are nowadays with this current singer - and cheaper. If it was Brian and Roger alone, I'd might even have thought about it. I'd rather go to a concert of Brian and Roger playing the whole Flash Gordon than this. If we don't have better concerts, it's not Queen v. 2.0's fault. I heard that Cindy Lauper's concerts were pretty good as well. And sold out too. |
Raf 13.12.2008 19:24 |
In Rio, the cheapest tickets were R$120 - only R$60 if you're a student, if you're under 21, if you're over 65, if you're retired... Due to tickets being 50% cheaper for students, I was at the VIP area right in front at the stage for only R$200. It was on a Saturday night, too. |
YourValentine 13.12.2008 19:40 |
inu-liger wrote:
The reason those "Queen fans" love to bash TCR?
Because they're trolls with personal, horribly stressful lives for whatever reason(s) - maybe work sucks or whatever -, that *KNOW* this bashing gets on our nerves, and so do take out their stress on us for that reason, cos it'll satisfy them in the end with all the anger they've channelled unto others that way :-) *
And what is your excuse for bringing up "TM" in each and every topic? That's so much closer to trolling, isn't it? |
Saint Jiub 13.12.2008 21:21 |
Flush_Gurdun wrote:
Panchgani wrote: ???? Stick to your own damn vile topics for fuck sakes. ???? This an anti-TCR thread ... evidently you are the invader in this topic. Personally I think that TCR is just OK, but it certainly doesn't find "Time to Shine". However, compared to the Flash Gordon Soundtrack or the Freddie Mercury Album, TCR is a timeless classic.Ha Ha... good point... maybe inu-l should have read the topic heading first! As for FG and the FMA... these are both superior to TCR IMO. Can you honestly answer a question? Which songs on TCR are worse than these 10 songs from the Flash Gordon Soundtrack ???: In the Space Capsule Ming's Theme The Ring In the Death Cell Execution of Flash Arboria Flash to the Rescue Vultan's Theme Marriage of Dale and Ming Flash's Theme Reprise |
Marcos Napier 14.12.2008 10:34 |
Which songs on TCR are worse than these 10 songs from the Flash Gordon Soundtrack ???: All but Still Burnin'. |
Reading Princess 14.12.2008 10:41 |
Flush_Gurdun wrote:
Panchgani wrote:
???? Stick to your own damn vile topics for fuck sakes. ????
This an anti-TCR thread ... evidently you are the invader in this topic.
Personally I think that TCR is just OK, but it certainly doesn't find "Time to Shine". However, compared to the Flash Gordon Soundtrack or the Freddie Mercury Album, TCR is a timeless classic.
Ha Ha... good point... maybe inu-l should have read the topic heading first! As for FG and the FMA... these are both superior to TCR IMO.
TCR isn't worth taking back to the shops... that's a bit extreme tho. It's an alright album that PR, BM and RT have got together and made. I'll be honest, I have only listened to it twice and only liked a handful of songs. They sounded better live IMO. By using the name Queen you are going to have fans compare to past endeavors... the guys prob new this all along... they also must know Freddie is bigger than them all put together solely because his death has made him a legend... even if the album was amazing folk would still have said it's not a patch on ANATO... or Freddie would have given the songs that extra bit of magic.
It's funny that fans here are still blasting this album though. This album brought about another tour... and I was lucky enough to see Queen tour for the first time in my life after being addicted to their music for nearly 20 years, so if the decide to make another and then tour again... GO FOR IT.
Reality check - You didn't see Queen (unless you travelled back to the 80s) |
Saint Jiub 14.12.2008 11:06 |
Marcos Napier wrote:Which songs on TCR are worse than these 10 songs from the Flash Gordon Soundtrack ???:All but Still Burnin'. So, let me get this straight ... You would rather be locked in a room with a loop of ... "Why is water coming from her eyes? It's what they call tears. It's a sign of their weaknessssss" ... than listen to any song from TCR (aside from Still Burning) Wow. Did the Cult of Fred teach you this? |
pittrek 14.12.2008 12:19 |
I gave up the reading after page 2. Who won ? |
Flush_Gurdun 14.12.2008 12:23 |
Clear wrote - Reality check - You didn't see Queen (unless you travelled back to the 80s) Strangely enough... my ticket stub says "QUEEN + Paul Rodgers". So with that in mind... I saw QUEEN. Two members are still billing themselves as QUEEN so nobody has the right to say that they aren't. Pretty certain they played a lot of QUEEN songs too. My favourite singer and entertainer of all time is Freddie Mercury... nobody will ever replace that fact to me... but I still see the remaining members as Queen, and they damn well can call themselves this til they hang up their boots. Do you think they give a toss that some pathetic little nobody has a problem with them calling themselves QUEEN just because Freddie and John aren't in the band anymore? Get a fucking life mate and stop trying to persuade the world that they should agree with your petty little argument. I didn't even want to get involved with this argument... I don't rate the album compared to past Queen records, but I wouldn't take TCR back to the shops just because Freddie's voice isn't computer imposed into any the songs. |
Marcos Napier 14.12.2008 16:33 |
Panchgani wrote:Marcos Napier wrote:So, let me get this straight ... You would rather be locked in a room with a loop of ... "Why is water coming from her eyes? It's what they call tears. It's a sign of their weaknessssss" ... than listen to any song from TCR (aside from Still Burning) Wow. Did the Cult of Fred teach you this?Which songs on TCR are worse than these 10 songs from the Flash Gordon Soundtrack ???:All but Still Burnin'. Yes and yes. |
Ken8 14.12.2008 19:55 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I accept that I probably have stacks of naivety in this area, but I don't see how TCR can damage Queen's legacy or reputation - in the eyes of an intelligent person, at least. Queen's legacy is set in stone; those albums, live recordings and songs aren't going anywhere. One can easily choose to ignore everything they did after a certain point; if 'the public' were to suddenly see Queen as a joke just because of some bad collaborations in the years 1992-2008, then big deal. For what it's worth, I don't think that's happened. Where I live, people don't even know there was a new Queen album. Get a new promotional team, Brian... Yeah, I tend to agree that most people understand this is NOT the same Queen as the classic model whose legacy IS set in stone, that's obvious when you look at the sales figures....but working in the media as I do, it is clear that the notion of new material, collaborations and tours by "Queen" are mostly met with lots of eye rolling and questions of why?.... ...and that has a lot to do with people being reluctant to put their hands in their pockets to promote something like TCR. The very concept of it is too big a sell, nevermind the actual product is wanting and below the standard of something purporting to be Queen. Again, "TCR" is not "Back In Black" without Bon Scott. |
john bodega 14.12.2008 22:24 |
Ken8 wrote: the notion of new material, collaborations and tours by "Queen" are mostly met with lots of eye rolling and questions of why?.... Indeed. That's mostly what I've been hearing out of my family and friends, actually. |
Ken8 16.12.2008 04:27 |
The thing is about this whole "TCR" debacle is the band themselves had the ball in their court to shut up the naysayers and deliver something......well, worthy of their talents. Had "TCR" been another "Back In Black" (to use that example again) or "5150" etc it may have stood a chance of capturing peoples' attention. I say "may" because I still do believe the idea of Queen without you know who is a heck of a sell to the general public, no matter how good the new music is. Now the thing for Queen+Rodgers is that the relative failure of "TCR" in the eyes of the public only makes the shadow of their former glories look even more insurmountable. Before you know it you're attempting to tour the U.S. behind a dud record and the best slot you can get is opening for some corporate, MOR, AOR band. It can't be good for the brand. |