| shoemanbundy 24.09.2008 02:43 |
Well, I just downloaded the song for free off the internet, as I wouldn't have bought it anyway a hehe he he, a ha, hoo! All the songs are not good. I'll have you know being the Queen fan I am, I compared this to every Queen release before this one. It doesn't compare. That just shocked me. I mean, what the hell? And it just shows how much Queen needed Freddie to live. Man they can't survive, and I have Paul Rogers!! He's just a muscle jerk who looks like Chuck Norris!! :( C-lebrity? More like C-rap! |
| shoemanbundy 24.09.2008 02:45 |
Yes...I have him. I meant to type that, for you see I hold the album in my hands, so in theory, I hold him. For to be the owner, one also ...holds...or something. |
| Proko 24.09.2008 06:21 |
well , just another music critic ! where the hell have you been all our lives ?? we just couldn't live without your proffessional opinion ! NEXT TOPIC !! |
| TheGame 24.09.2008 06:43 |
Chuck Norris FTW Just as serious as the topic starter, go figure! |
| Band Forever 24.09.2008 17:33 |
I agree TCR is a poor imitation generally lacking any guile or anything innovative.of I just read their article in MOJO Mag here in the U.K., It made me laugh when I heard Rodgers spout that there wasn't anything in the Queen Catalouge he couldn't handle? Your having a laugh Mr, you can't even sing Queen songs in the right key or the same power without sounding a slightly better version of RT. Your voice would be off stage after the first number if you sang in tune Mr Rodgers. |
| Ray D O'Gaga 24.09.2008 20:09 |
shoemanbundy wrote: Well, I just downloaded the song for free off the internet, as I wouldn't have bought it anyway a hehe he he, a ha, hoo! All the songs are not good. I'll have you know being the Queen fan I am, I compared this to every Queen release before this one. It doesn't compare. That just shocked me. I mean, what the hell? And it just shows how much Queen needed Freddie to live. Man they can't survive, and I have Paul Rogers!! He's just a muscle jerk who looks like Chuck Norris!! :( C-lebrity? More like C-rap!Sorry, can't understand a word you're saying. This reads like it was written in English, translated to French, and then translated back to English again. Its like Yoda wrote this. And, seriously, there are like a 100 topics about this album and people's opinions of it. Are you so egotistical that you had to start your own thread about it? I mean, really, ego much? i.e. much ego having are you? Not too C-lever. btw, I just got an e-mail from 1990 - it wants its Married With Children reference back. |
| doxonrox 24.09.2008 20:39 |
Ray D O'Gaga wrote:Absolutely. God forbid that anyone else be able to post they're review - we've already read three, damnit!shoemanbundy wrote: Well, I just downloaded the song for free off the internet, as I wouldn't have bought it anyway a hehe he he, a ha, hoo! All the songs are not good. I'll have you know being the Queen fan I am, I compared this to every Queen release before this one. It doesn't compare. That just shocked me. I mean, what the hell? And it just shows how much Queen needed Freddie to live. Man they can't survive, and I have Paul Rogers!! He's just a muscle jerk who looks like Chuck Norris!! :( C-lebrity? More like C-rap!Sorry, can't understand a word you're saying. This reads like it was written in English, translated to French, and then translated back to English again. Its like Yoda wrote this. And, seriously, there are like a 100 topics about this album and people's opinions of it. Are you so egotistical that you had to start your own thread about it? I mean, really, ego much? i.e. much ego having are you? Not too C-lever. btw, I just got an e-mail from 1990 - it wants its Married With Children reference back. Pull your panties out of crack, Ray. Your personal attacks at someone stating an opinion put you in the company of Treasure Moment and SomebodywhoLoves. |
| marcenciels 24.09.2008 20:58 |
i just wonder how old is this poster ? |
| i-Fred 24.09.2008 21:42 |
Wow, every one here is critic who has so much to say about they think about CR. Well, in my opinion. Let’s Strip the title of Queen, and leave it has Brian, Roger and Paul, who have made a record. Listen to it with out comparing to Queen, which is Brian, Roger, Freddie and John. What you have, is actually a great album. Take it on its merits and you have some fine music to listen to. Elements of Queen are there for obvious reasons, and Paul’s influence is there also. Its starting to ware thin to say it need’s Freddie, because the same can be said about not having John in there as well. If the album was something you picked up with out any prior knowledge of the group, and with no expectations to how good it will be, and by just letting the music take you away, you will find it to be a great album and establish a connection with it…. Maybe you won’t…. But needles to say, you will not like for it other reason other than bashing the Queen aspect. The album does boast some great moments, some of Brian’s work is great, and all the songs have a different sound. Its Brian and Roger, with Paul coming together collectively with what they are capable of within being musicians. Comparing it to a Queen records it, really, silly. Its like having Groucho with out Harpo or Chicko, then saying its Crap. I think it makes for great music, and that if you take it for what it is, it does equal a good album. |
| Bo Alex 24.09.2008 21:59 |
haha it's true. Paul Rodgers looks like Chuck Norris. And also has a horrible taste for fashion and his movements are so embarrased. Tough, I think he's a very good singer, but O don't like his style and don't think he suits well with Queen's songs. |
| Knute 24.09.2008 23:19 |
pah |
| madeinheaven! 42122 28.09.2008 12:17 |
I think that's a bit unfair! I enjoyed that! Not as good as with Freddie and I don't like Paul Rogers but Brian and Roger are as good as ever! |
| GonnaUseMyPrisoners 29.09.2008 22:32 |
Well aren't WE the clever one, bundy. But dear, who should care about the opinions of those who illegally procure commercially available music without paying for it? And I suppose you judged the full album by Paul Rodgers' ultra-masculine likeness on the sleeve? Perhaps you like younger boys better. Check out a boy band, I'm sure their image and style will suit you fine. No one who makes a living creating and recording music gives a damn about leeches who don't pay for it, yet still find loads of cheek to criticise living legends as though they weren't human. Get over yourself. Don |
| shoemanbundy 30.09.2008 19:07 |
I guess everybody missed the point of this topic. I was trying to just spew most arguments against this album into one post. I didn't think it actually came off as being serious. Then again this place isn't ever serious so who cares :D And FYI I'm nearing my 50's guys... |
| marcenciels 30.09.2008 19:41 |
sheosman... you are projecting on your own person. that's all that comes out of your post...projection. for a guy just a bit older than me ( if naturally you're telling your real age), you should know why they kept, Brain & Roger, their bran name. it might not make them sell millions of this album...but it will sell shows. and those who go see them live are happy to have done so. havent read one fan really sorry to have paid to see them so far. as for the result of the album, if anybody expected that it would be like the Queen of the pass... |
| Winter Land Man 30.09.2008 21:39 |
shoemanbundy wrote: Well, I just downloaded the song for free off the internet, as I wouldn't have bought it anyway a hehe he he, a ha, hoo! All the songs are not good. I'll have you know being the Queen fan I am, I compared this to every Queen release before this one. It doesn't compare. That just shocked me. I mean, what the hell? And it just shows how much Queen needed Freddie to live. Man they can't survive, and I have Paul Rogers!! He's just a muscle jerk who looks like Chuck Norris!! :( C-lebrity? More like C-rap! Do you SHINE your bean today? |