SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 12:05 |
Brian & Roger are only proving one thing with this new Album: That Freddie Mercury was the MAIN reason for Queen's success and sound. In the past, we argued that it was a partnership of Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John. But now I am not sure that Brian + Roger + John is even half of what Freddie contributed. Freddie IS / WAS Queen. The "Red Special" used to be a signature piece of Queen. No longer. Brian has proven that with this new album. Brian, Roger, what you SHOULD've done was hire a Singer who can sing great, and remind us of Queen. Nobody could replace Freddie, but you should've hired a singer who could come close. Paul Rogers is too different from the Queen sound. You guys screwed up badly. |
pittrek 13.09.2008 12:17 |
Jesus Christ how many fucking threads do you people want to start ? |
john bodega 13.09.2008 12:21 |
And another mouth-breather crawls out of the woodwork. Who's next; kenny8? Why don't we start posting links to Jackass videos and tractor pulls? |
Rick 13.09.2008 12:38 |
Haha, you're the loser in the end buddy. If you hate this project, why waste bandwidth and/or money on it? Laughable. Next topic please. |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 12:51 |
Tool bag. |
Ray D O'Gaga 13.09.2008 12:51 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Brian & Roger are only proving one thing with this new Album: That Freddie Mercury was the MAIN reason for Queen's success and sound. In the past, we argued that it was a partnership of Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John. But now I am not sure that Brian + Roger + John is even half of what Freddie contributed. Freddie IS / WAS Queen. The "Red Special" used to be a signature piece of Queen. No longer. Brian has proven that with this new album. Brian, Roger, what you SHOULD've done was hire a Singer who can sing great, and remind us of Queen. Nobody could replace Freddie, but you should've hired a singer who could come close. Paul Rogers is too different from the Queen sound. You guys screwed up badly.The Cult of Fred is everywhere. I'm so sick of reading crap like this. "Blah blah blah, boo hoo, its not Freddie." Freddie's been dead for 17 years. Stay home and listen to your CDs. Or better yet, your scratchy old vinyl. Put on a polyester leisure suit, some white leather shoes and matching belt, dance the Hustle while you sip on a Tab, and let the rest of us get on with living in the present day. So, in the words of Dick Cheney, go fuck yourself. |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 13:36 |
It's not the Cult of Freddie. It's the simple truth. Brian and Roger are only making fools of themselves, and are showing how little they contributed to the Queen sound. |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 13:50 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: It's not the Cult of Freddie. It's the simple truth. Brian and Roger are only making fools of themselves, and are showing how little they contributed to the Queen sound.You're a complete moron. If one can put their Freddie bias aside, and take this record on its own, it is a great collaboration between three of rocks best, and it sounds that way. It's not Paul Rodgers singing over "Queen" music, was never supposed to be. I would consider THAT a slap in the face. This record is Paul Rodgers, Brian May, and Roger Taylor making completely new music, together. And, it works, and works well. |
LucTonnerre 13.09.2008 13:56 |
Yeah, especially when I put the Freddie aspect aside, this album is extremely boring and stupid. Face the fact: The cosmos sucks! |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 14:02 |
Then way waste your time blathering? Fucktard. |
john bodega 13.09.2008 14:12 |
In all honesty I cannot call myself a fan of the new album... suffice it to say I don't think it deserves 'bashing'. Unlike some of the critics here, who can't even be arsed slapping together an articulate post on the subject. There should be camps for people like these... |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 14:19 |
Zebonka12 wrote: BLAH BLAH BLAH.... There should be camps for people like these...*thick sarcasm on* How very Hitler sounding of you. *sarcasm off* |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 14:22 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Then way waste your time blathering? Fucktard.Because we live in a FREE society where we have Freedom of Speech? And um..also because this is a Messageboard? |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 14:23 |
pittrek wrote: Jesus Christ how many fucking threads do you people want to start ?As many as we can to piss people like you off. YAY...we pissed him off! WHOO HOO! |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 14:26 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:There you have it. A troll in the finest sense.pittrek wrote: Jesus Christ how many fucking threads do you people want to start ?As many as we can to piss people like you off. YAY...we pissed him off! WHOO HOO! There should be camps for trolls like you, complete with death squads. |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 14:28 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:Freedom of Speech and acting like a complete idiot are two vastly different things.....Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Then way waste your time blathering? Fucktard.Because we live in a FREE society where we have Freedom of Speech? And um..also because this is a Messageboard? You mother should have aborted you. |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 14:29 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote:You are scary. SCARY.SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:There you have it. A troll in the finest sense. There should be camps for trolls like you, complete with death squads.pittrek wrote: Jesus Christ how many fucking threads do you people want to start ?As many as we can to piss people like you off. YAY...we pissed him off! WHOO HOO! |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 14:29 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote:Clearly the concept of Free Speech eludes you...SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:Freedom of Speech and acting like a complete idiot are two vastly different things..... You mother should have aborted you.Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Then way waste your time blathering? Fucktard.Because we live in a FREE society where we have Freedom of Speech? And um..also because this is a Messageboard? |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 14:35 |
Fight fire with fire... As you said, freedom of speech. Or, is that only for you? |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 13.09.2008 14:48 |
OH my God!!! another one of these threads, Im getting really tired of queenzone |
Treasure Moment 13.09.2008 14:50 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Brian & Roger are only proving one thing with this new Album: That Freddie Mercury was the MAIN reason for Queen's success and sound. In the past, we argued that it was a partnership of Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John. But now I am not sure that Brian + Roger + John is even half of what Freddie contributed. Freddie IS / WAS Queen. The "Red Special" used to be a signature piece of Queen. No longer. Brian has proven that with this new album. Brian, Roger, what you SHOULD've done was hire a Singer who can sing great, and remind us of Queen. Nobody could replace Freddie, but you should've hired a singer who could come close. Paul Rogers is too different from the Queen sound. You guys screwed up badly.I agree with everything you said except the part about hiring somone who could come close to freddie, thats IMPOSSIBLE! no one can ever come close to freddies voice and vocals, its just not possible. Brian, roger and john are all part of Queen of course, its just that freddie is the one who made those songs 10 times better than they would be without him, i can imagine how he has made suggestions and changes to the others songs so that they became as good as they are. |
JoxerTheDeityPirate 13.09.2008 14:52 |
everyone's a critic... |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 13.09.2008 14:52 |
I agree with everything you said except the part about hiring somone who could come close to freddie, thats IMPOSSIBLE! no one can ever come close to freddies voice and vocals, its just not possible. dude, why havent you committed suicide yet? |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 14:53 |
JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote: everyone's a critic...I'm not being critical to be an a-Hole. I revere every member of Queen. Brian and Roger went from being gods of Rock and Roll to being pathetic. Seriously, this album SUCKS. |
Mercury 90 13.09.2008 15:22 |
I think this album does not show how much every Queen member was responsible for the queen sound, because they don't want to try to make the queen sound on this album.... you know as they said they are a new band.... robert plant and the strange sensation doesen't sound like led zeppelin and I think he added much to the zeppelin sound (same with drummer of nirvana and the foo fighters... I just forgot his name) |
Haystacks Calhoun II 13.09.2008 15:38 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:Does the caps make it seem more, what is the word, important?JoxerTheDeityPirate wrote: everyone's a critic...I'm not being critical to be an a-Hole. I revere every member of Queen. Brian and Roger went from being gods of Rock and Roll to being pathetic. Seriously, this album SUCKS. We get it. You're trying to stir the pot. Whoop-dee-doo. We're not impressed. |
August R. 13.09.2008 15:39 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Brian & Roger are only proving one thing with this new Album: That Freddie Mercury was the MAIN reason for Queen's success and sound. In the past, we argued that it was a partnership of Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John. But now I am not sure that Brian + Roger + John is even half of what Freddie contributed. Freddie IS / WAS Queen. The "Red Special" used to be a signature piece of Queen. No longer. Brian has proven that with this new album.I think Brian proved on his solo album Back To The Light that he can alone replicate the Queen sound if he wants to. QPR is a new band with new direction. Paul's unique style (that differs radically from Freddie) made it possible to try something totally different this time. |
Whisperer 13.09.2008 15:44 |
Queen sound or not, this album will not be a worldwide success, like many (most?) Queen albums were. Reason - there are many many very talented very skillful musicians in the world and all of them can't be superstars. You need that "extra magical ingredient" and that extraordinary ingredient was Freddie. Do the Brian, Roger and Paul know it? Of course they do and they have never stated to be better or bigger stars/legends than Freddie. For me Queen was Freddie and he made Queen legends. I still enjoy listening to Brian's and Roger's solo stuff. What comes to Paul, his music is something I've always disliked, so for me this collaborotion is of very low interest. But it's nice that they still make music and keep Freddie's memory alive. And what comes to the headline of this topic, I agree 100%. Every member of Queen was essential for the band, but the fact every single Queen fanatic knows deep inside is that Freddie was the most essential of them. |
SomebodyWhoLoves 13.09.2008 15:48 |
Yes I agree with Whisperer. There are many excellent technical Musicians out there, but to be successful, you also require Charm, and "Magic". My thought is, this new Album by Queen + PR will bomb, achieving not much more success than either Brian or Roger's individual efforts. Then we shall never hear of Queen + PR again. The boys really messed up on this. They should've hired a great Singer like Salvo Bruno. |
Treasure Moment 13.09.2008 16:31 |
Adolfo wrote:I agree with everything you said except the part about hiring somone who could come close to freddie, thats IMPOSSIBLE! no one can ever come close to freddies voice and vocals, its just not possible. dude, why havent you committed suicide yet?' because i want to kill you first before i do it. |
emrabt 13.09.2008 16:42 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Brian & Roger are only proving one thing with this new Album: That Freddie Mercury was the MAIN reason for Queen's success and sound. In the past, we argued that it was a partnership of Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John. But now I am not sure that Brian + Roger + John is even half of what Freddie contributed. Freddie IS / WAS Queen. The "Red Special" used to be a signature piece of Queen. No longer.This kind of proves JOHN WAS QUEEN, Made in Heaven was Brian, JOHN and Roger (and tapes of Freddie) Freddie had little to no input and that album was very queen. now with only Brian and Roger Blah Blah BLah sound lost. |
kingogre 13.09.2008 17:12 |
This album is the best thing theyve done in years. Might not be a huge success, but many GREAT albums arent. The record business has changed, no point in arguing about that. Its not an imitation of their old sound, but then again that would have been completely pointless. And Brian has already proven several times that he can sound like Queen on his own if he wants to, no point in doing that again. Queen were always about moving forward and doing new things, and now theyve done it again. Paul is one of the absolutely best singers of his generation active today and an extraordinarily talented musician, to only use him as somekind of vehicle for making a Queen-retro record would have been stupid. Brian and Roger has now proved they can make great music on their own and how great musicians they were along and still are. Paul shows what a legend he truly is and why he is criminally unknown to many people. |
jeffuk49 13.09.2008 17:26 |
THE COSMOS ROCKS, i have been a Queenfan since the 70's yes I would love Freddie to be with us but its not gonna happen, this album i just cant explain it!!!! i will buy it but i just had to download it first, hey it may be not Queen as we know it but its 3 amazing musicians playing around they dont need the money but its their job and it made my spine quiver, they couldhave retired but NO they played on and amen..... SURFS UP IS AMAZING......very Roger |
Ray D O'Gaga 13.09.2008 20:37 |
kingogre wrote: This album is the best thing theyve done in years. Might not be a huge success, but many GREAT albums arent. The record business has changed, no point in arguing about that. Its not an imitation of their old sound, but then again that would have been completely pointless. And Brian has already proven several times that he can sound like Queen on his own if he wants to, no point in doing that again. Queen were always about moving forward and doing new things, and now theyve done it again. Paul is one of the absolutely best singers of his generation active today and an extraordinarily talented musician, to only use him as somekind of vehicle for making a Queen-retro record would have been stupid. Brian and Roger has now proved they can make great music on their own and how great musicians they were along and still are. Paul shows what a legend he truly is and why he is criminally unknown to many people.A pleasantly sensible post. Kudos. Everybody who disagrees with you is, again, welcome to go fuck themselves. That means you, SomebodyWhoLoves and Treasure Moment :-) Freedom of Speech RAWKS! |
inu-liger 13.09.2008 22:25 |
Haystacks Calhounski wrote:Exactly.SomebodyWhoLoves wrote:Freedom of Speech and acting like a complete idiot are two vastly different things..... You mother should have aborted you.Haystacks Calhounski wrote: Then way waste your time blathering? Fucktard.Because we live in a FREE society where we have Freedom of Speech? And um..also because this is a Messageboard? Although I would have said this instead: "It's people like you that are the reason abortions should be free" (said by my manager to one of our crew members, who just moved recently THANKFULLY...his attitude really pissed us off a lot) |
Ken8 13.09.2008 23:32 |
"And another mouth-breather crawls out of the woodwork. Who's next; kenny8?" Gee, been a while. I must've hit a nerve. Wanna see a "mouth breather"? Check out Zebonka's pictures and inane jibberish on his site. The funny thing is that he thinks he's "clever" The album is lifeless, dull and pedestrian beyond belief. AOR middle of the road boredom. Even I was expecting something more. But now the apologists are dragging out the line "But it's a different band!!" So why then use the Queen name at all? You only alienate people expecting to hear something like Queen. Sorry, but the Queen name issue aside, there's too much rock talent involved in this mess for them to deliver such a poor effort. |
john bodega 14.09.2008 00:42 |
Ken8 wrote: The funny thing is that he thinks he's "clever"Blah-blah-blah. When did I ever make that claim? SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Clearly the concept of Free Speech eludes you...How so? Freedom of speech means I can say 'I hope SomebodyWhoLoves bursts into flame', with a clear conscience. I haven't forgotten your misogynist posts in the Personal forum... you've already proven yourself to be a first class moron. I didn't like this album either, but the amount of threads being started on it is just embarrassing. Go join in an existing one. |
Ken8 14.09.2008 02:34 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Ken8 wrote: The funny thing is that he thinks he's "clever" QUOTE] Blah-blah-blah. When did I ever make that claim?And so quick to respond too! |
john bodega 14.09.2008 04:52 |
Trailer parks have internet now?? Jesus.... |
Tero 14.09.2008 05:36 |
kingogre wrote: This album is the best thing theyve done in years.This is the FIRST album they've done in years. Even Furia was released eight years ago, and it would be quite a stretch to call it even a "good thing". kingogre wrote: Queen were always about moving forward and doing new things, and now theyve done it again....Except this was supposed to be a new band, right? :P kingogre wrote: Brian and Roger has now proved they can make great music on their own and how great musicians they were along and still are. Paul shows what a legend he truly is and why he is criminally unknown to many people.Brian and Roger have proven they can still write songs like they did on their solo albums ten years ago, but those songs weren't that great back then. Performing on these songs has done nothing to improve the public image of Paul Rodgers. This forgettable and mediocre material will hardly make him stand out as a legend. |
Raf 14.09.2008 06:03 |
Oh, look who's back! |
Tero 14.09.2008 06:08 |
Raf wrote: Oh, look who's back!You didn't notice Brian and Roger's return before this topic? :o |
Band Forever 14.09.2008 07:38 |
So the album has been trashed by music critics. Freddie with his range of voice would have delivered the songs with a different more stellar approach and sound and given RT/BM/JD more licence with the notes they wanted to play. Paul Rodgers imo really struggles with the Queen stuff contrary to what BM&RT says. If I smoked 60 ciggies a day I could sound like Lemmy (Motorhead) sorry Paul Rodgers, too. |
john bodega 14.09.2008 07:59 |
Band Forever wrote: Freddie with his range of voice would have delivered the songs with a different more stellar approachThat may be true, but if he'd sung on this album then what you'd have would be great performances on songs that aren't all that special... |
Holly2003 14.09.2008 08:05 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Yep, sadly that's true. Not a bad album but not a very memorable one either. When I think of all those great and exciting Brian May solos of the past -- Killer Queen, Don't Stop me Now, Scandal, It's Late -- there's nothing remotely like that on here.Band Forever wrote: Freddie with his range of voice would have delivered the songs with a different more stellar approachThat may be true, but if he'd sung on this album then what you'd have would be great performances on songs that aren't all that special... |
erik41 14.09.2008 08:27 |
again im dutch forgive my spelling but the new album rocks dvd agian tears in my eyes like it or not but here is a gang of boys who know how to make music and the dvd is great like brian,roger and paul or not but they realy make good music play bloody good live these are men who know how to play and sound great and again... if you dont like.... get the heel out off here and let real queen fans love it all hee..queen is still around here afther almost 40 years... what other band can say that just enjoy... at least im am |
john bodega 14.09.2008 08:46 |
SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: Brian, Roger, what you SHOULD've done was hire a Singer who can sing great, and remind us of Queen.Let me guess..... that singer is you? |
anna_libra 14.09.2008 09:12 |
I like Q+PR but I don't like The Album. It's way below their level. Have I just signed myself a death sentence? NO, REALLY? Why do people criticize those who miss the old sound calling them names and accusing them for being stepford fans? it's more difficult to understand why (in the opinion of those who critisize fans for loving and respecting the memory of Freddie despite the fact that he's been dead for 17 years) EVERYTHING that BRIAN and ROGER do HAS to be brilliant?It doesn't. And it isn't. It's average and THAT is disappointing. Cheers |
boca 14.09.2008 10:35 |
well...to say brian and roger very little contributed to Queen sound is crime, but I agree with you that they should hire better singer, there's no doubt...PR is the last singer I would pick to sing Queen songs... |
kingogre 14.09.2008 12:54 |
Far from average in my opinion. Some great songs, many surprises and a very nice "real" organic feel exactly like they said. The musicianship is great, probably among the best theyve ever done. Few albums spring to mind were they have shown so much enthusiasm, creativity and energy on their instruments. They are one of those bands were the musicianship is enough to carry an album. They dont have to rely on that here though. Probably to much soul and blues for the teenyboppers though. |
April 14.09.2008 14:11 |
Well, guys, you shouldn't be too hard on those who love Queen, the old Queen, the true Queen. They just underline that they miss the authentic sound and miss Freddie very much. I miss him very much too!!! And that is good! We are to remember and love the old Queen, aren't we? However, if we weep for what's gone, we'll get stuck in the past. Let's embrace the present and the future and be happy about the fact that our faves are with us again. It's Brian and Roger, it's them, the legendary musicians! And I very much hope they won't try to imitate the old Queen sound!!! By no means! I hope they create something new!!! |
Tero 14.09.2008 14:29 |
April wrote: Let's embrace the present and the future and be happy about the fact that our faves are with us again. It's Brian and Roger, it's them, the legendary musicians!I really do hate to sound negative, but Brian and Roger are NOT my faves. My favourite group consisted of four equal members, and it took all four of them to be legendary. I'm sure quite a few people agree with me, and they are perfectly entitled to do so, without the need to be happy about something they don't really care about. Thanks! |
April 14.09.2008 15:00 |
Tero wrote:Yes, you are absolutely right! It took the 4 of them to be legendary. But if you stick to that premise then you have nothing to do with the new band as a fan. Isn't it better first to open your mind, listen to the group and judge it rather than have a foregone prejudiced attitude to them?April wrote: Let's embrace the present and the future and be happy about the fact that our faves are with us again. It's Brian and Roger, it's them, the legendary musicians!I really do hate to sound negative, but Brian and Roger are NOT my faves. My favourite group consisted of four equal members, and it took all four of them to be legendary. I'm sure quite a few people agree with me, and they are perfectly entitled to do so, without the need to be happy about something they don't really care about. Thanks! |
Treasure Moment 14.09.2008 15:07 |
this album sounds more like paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, has nothing to do with Queen whatsoever. |
April 14.09.2008 15:18 |
Treasure Moment wrote: this album sounds more like paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, has nothing to do with Queen whatsoever.I think you wanted to say: Brian May and Roger Taylor feat Paul Rodgers..? If it's vice versa then it's still Queen. |
anna_libra 14.09.2008 17:54 |
Average |
Bri-Anns Permed Poodle 14.09.2008 18:59 |
Thanks Brian and Roger you have turned the name Queen into a complete joke. What you should have done is sampled Freddie's voice on all new tracks instead of the useless pathetic excuse for a pub singer Rogers. PLEASE RETIRE NOW!!! Freddie was Queen you can never reclaim the magic you once had. ANGRY AS HELL. The new so called album Derserves the Media panning the media know Queen = Freddie why can't Brian and Roger ? |
Hitman1965 14.09.2008 19:05 |
Bri-Anns Permed Poodle wrote: Thanks Brian and Roger you have turned the name Queen into a complete joke. What you should have done is sampled Freddie's voice on all new tracks instead of the useless pathetic excuse for a pub singer Rogers. PLEASE RETIRE NOW!!! Freddie was Queen you can never reclaim the magic you once had. ANGEY AS HELL. The new so called album Derserves the Media panning the media know Queen = Freddie why can't Brian and Roger ?For God's sake get a life - didn't you notice the odd 350,000+ fans on Friday night? I somehow think you are in a very vocal but in real terms small minority. Looking forward to picking up my album of the year tomorrow :-) |
Bri-Anns Permed Poodle 14.09.2008 19:14 |
Hitman1965 wrote:M8 you will be the only person picking up this poor excuse for an album it won't even sell 50,000 in the UK thats for certain. I'm sure you are well proud of your Gold editions of Queen + Five "Will Will Rock you" and have Queen plus Britney Spears saved on your hard drive to treasure.Bri-Anns Permed Poodle wrote: Thanks Brian and Roger you have turned the name Queen into a complete joke. What you should have done is sampled Freddie's voice on all new tracks instead of the useless pathetic excuse for a pub singer Rogers. PLEASE RETIRE NOW!!! Freddie was Queen you can never reclaim the magic you once had. ANGEY AS HELL. The new so called album Derserves the Media panning the media know Queen = Freddie why can't Brian and Roger ?For God's sake get a life - didn't you notice the odd 350,000+ fans on Friday night? I somehow think you are in a very vocal but in real terms small minority. Looking forward to picking up my album of the year tomorrow :-) No Freddie no Queen. Why the fuck didn't they create a new band instead of using the name Queen ? Answer because Brian and Roger know the Queen name sells. But not in this case. |
Tero 14.09.2008 23:24 |
April wrote:I'm sorry, I took your previous post to mean I should like this new band as well because it has two of those four members.Tero wrote:Yes, you are absolutely right! It took the 4 of them to be legendary. But if you stick to that premise then you have nothing to do with the new band as a fan. Isn't it better first to open your mind, listen to the group and judge it rather than have a foregone prejudiced attitude to them?April wrote: Let's embrace the present and the future and be happy about the fact that our faves are with us again. It's Brian and Roger, it's them, the legendary musicians!I really do hate to sound negative, but Brian and Roger are NOT my faves. My favourite group consisted of four equal members, and it took all four of them to be legendary. I'm sure quite a few people agree with me, and they are perfectly entitled to do so, without the need to be happy about something they don't really care about. Thanks! I do have their earlier solo work, and despite being good at times, it's missing that something that makes them Queen, just like this new album. Even the poorest of Queen albums in the past (I would say Jazz or the Works) have had moments of brilliance in them, but the Cosmos Rocks didn't have them. That isn't prejudice, that's admitting to the reality. |
Ken8 14.09.2008 23:25 |
kingogre wrote: Far from average in my opinion. Some great songs, many surprises and a very nice "real" organic feel exactly like they said. The musicianship is great, probably among the best theyve ever done. Few albums spring to mind were they have shown so much enthusiasm, creativity and energy on their instruments. They are one of those bands were the musicianship is enough to carry an album. They dont have to rely on that here though. Probably to much soul and blues for the teenyboppers though.You mean, probably too much soul and blues (and mediocre songs) for Queen fans. |
Treasure Moment 15.09.2008 02:18 |
Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact. |
kingogre 15.09.2008 02:50 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.Mr Bad Guy, three good songs and a lot of embarrasing 80s gay disco. That album has aged A LOT. |
Ken8 15.09.2008 03:40 |
kingogre wrote:Yes it has, by todays standards it's a relic of another era.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.Mr Bad Guy, three good songs and a lot of embarrasing 80s gay disco. That album has aged A LOT. The Cosmos Rocks is also a relic of another era, and it's brand new. Do these guys even know what's going on in the music scene anymore? Not only is it a mediocre effort, it's so out of touch it's cringeworthy. |
Holly2003 15.09.2008 04:34 |
Ken8 wrote:Err.. out of touch with what? Do you expect a Queen hip hop album? Rap? Techno? What exactly did you expect from Queen + PR?kingogre wrote:Yes it has, by todays standards it's a relic of another era. The Cosmos Rocks is also a relic of another era, and it's brand new. Do these guys even know what's going on in the music scene anymore? Not only is it a mediocre effort, it's so out of touch it's cringeworthy.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.Mr Bad Guy, three good songs and a lot of embarrasing 80s gay disco. That album has aged A LOT. |
kingogre 15.09.2008 04:40 |
Holly2003 wrote:Was just going to write this.Ken8 wrote:Err.. out of touch with what? Do you expect a Queen hip hop album? Rap? Techno? What exactly did you expect from Queen + PR?kingogre wrote:Yes it has, by todays standards it's a relic of another era. The Cosmos Rocks is also a relic of another era, and it's brand new. Do these guys even know what's going on in the music scene anymore? Not only is it a mediocre effort, it's so out of touch it's cringeworthy.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.Mr Bad Guy, three good songs and a lot of embarrasing 80s gay disco. That album has aged A LOT. |
Ken8 15.09.2008 05:55 |
Holly2003 wrote:If in 2008 you have to ask, you explain why you're happy with a relic like The Cosmos Rocks.Ken8 wrote:Err.. out of touch with what? Do you expect a Queen hip hop album? Rap? Techno? What exactly did you expect from Queen + PR?kingogre wrote:Yes it has, by todays standards it's a relic of another era. The Cosmos Rocks is also a relic of another era, and it's brand new. Do these guys even know what's going on in the music scene anymore? Not only is it a mediocre effort, it's so out of touch it's cringeworthy.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.Mr Bad Guy, three good songs and a lot of embarrasing 80s gay disco. That album has aged A LOT. Instead of their unique, timeless sound, they now sound ancient in a way that their old catalogue mostly doesn't. And they certainly struggle to find a hook or a catchy melody like they used to toss off with ease. |
Holly2003 15.09.2008 06:30 |
Ken8 wrote: [QUOTEIf in 2008 you have to ask, you explain why you're happy with a relic like The Cosmos Rocks. Instead of their unique, timeless sound, they now sound ancient in a way that their old catalogue mostly doesn't. And they certainly struggle to find a hook or a catchy melody like they used to toss off with ease.If you want my review of the album you can find it elsewhere on the site. However, to cut a long story short, I think it's just okay. Regarding the timless thing, to give the most obvious examples, Queen 1 and the 80s stuff do not sound 'timeless' at all. It's also hard to take your argument seriously since some distance and perspective is needed to assess how 'timeless' a newly released album will sound in the future. Right now, it sounds pretty much like I expected it to. Anyone expecting anything else from this trio of musicians was probably delusional and unrealistic. Catchy hooks: there are a few, but a lot of these songs are growers -- understated, quiet, dignified even. I'm not interested any more in hearing oaps belting out AOBTD. What I will say is that Brian's guitar is a little disappointing. Standard 12 bar licks, overdone guitar orchestration where it's not really required, and most sadly not one memorable guitar solo. |
kingogre 15.09.2008 06:38 |
Used to toss off with ease, thats rubbish they worked extremely hard for those songs. This album has a different feel becuase of what Paul brings, so I can understand that some people depending on what period of Queen they prefer wont find it appealing, but rubbish it isnt. Its not ANATO2 or GH4 but who thought theyd get that. They are 60-year old men, they cant do anything about that. Times changes, peoples tastes changes, people grow old. To think they could just toss off an album and be the biggest thing on the planet is unreasonable. Teenagers wouldnt have bought if Freddie had been alive anyway. |
Fastguitars 15.09.2008 08:10 |
Well, ive not heard the album.....seems im one of those long time early fans that prefers to think that Freddie was "Queen" and the other 3 just supported him after about the 3rd Album when he sort of totally took over the band....maybe u would disagree,but the fact is, after BoRap, "Queen" ceased to be about the band anymore, and frankly, that is acceptable, coz its Freddie's voice that was the centerpiece along with his persona.....Regarding this album?, well, it is offensive that 50% of the band calls themselves "Queen" while 100% of the point of the band is in the grave......Even John Deacon realizes this and was the first one to do the right thing....However, as Brian never felt that he was appreciated and still has that axe to grind, i guess that Rog will follow him to the grave or the next stage....whatever comes first......and oh yeah, the new album cant be any worse then Hot Space or Brian's 2nd Solo outing, however, its not a Queen album, and how do i know this?....Coz the real Queen is not singing for them anymore. |
Holly2003 15.09.2008 08:31 |
Fastguitars wrote: Well, ive not heard the album.....seems im one of those long time early fans that prefers to think that Freddie was "Queen" and the other 3 just supported him after about the 3rd Album when he sort of totally took over the band....maybe u would disagree,but the fact is, after BoRap, "Queen" ceased to be about the band anymore, and frankly, that is acceptable, coz its Freddie's voice that was the centerpiece along with his persona.....Regarding this album?, well, it is offensive that 50% of the band calls themselves "Queen" while 100% of the point of the band is in the grave......Even John Deacon realizes this and was the first one to do the right thing....However, as Brian never felt that he was appreciated and still has that axe to grind, i guess that Rog will follow him to the grave or the next stage....whatever comes first......and oh yeah, the new album cant be any worse then Hot Space or Brian's 2nd Solo outing, however, its not a Queen album, and how do i know this?....Coz the real Queen is not singing for them anymore.They're really coming out of the woodwork now... |
kingogre 15.09.2008 08:44 |
Nothing of what he says has any support outside of his own imagination though. But weve already had this argument a thousant times, theres no point in going through it all again. |
Treasure Moment 15.09.2008 09:32 |
April wrote:its not queen, queen is freddie,john,brian,roger. what i meant was that the songs sounds like something paul rodgers would do and not brian or roger.Treasure Moment wrote: this album sounds more like paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, has nothing to do with Queen whatsoever.I think you wanted to say: Brian May and Roger Taylor feat Paul Rodgers..? If it's vice versa then it's still Queen. |
john bodega 15.09.2008 09:49 |
"We Believe" reminds me of John Farnham and "Call Me" reminds me of "Tommy Can You Hear Me?". Bleh. |
drwinston 15.09.2008 10:30 |
Zebonka12 wrote: "We Believe" reminds me of John Farnham and "Call Me" reminds me of "Tommy Can You Hear Me?". Bleh.Ha, I thought the same thing about a John Farnam song. Although the verses sound note for note like the John Parr song, "St. Elmo's Fire". I don't know if that one ever got played in Europe or not. |
Oberon 15.09.2008 13:16 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.I know you think Mr Bad Guy was fantastic, but I really don't. It's ok, but I don't remember it lighting up the world, or reading anything to that effect. Barcelona was a real achievement, but it doesn't really interest me as an album (but i am a rock fan really, so no surprise). the Queen re-works of FM and RT songs were interesting, but I wish they'd been b-sides or on a raities and not on MIH. I'd have preferred MIH to have been an EP of the "new material" But my point is that I don't really think the Mr Bad Guy and Barcelona can be held as evidence that Freddie was that major component in Queen. Obviously important, but I really think it was the combination of the four all acting as each other's quality control that made it work. I'm not denying that Freddie wrote many of their best songs - BoRhap, MOTBQ, STL etc, or that he might have been very instrumental in key songs like Radio Ga Ga, A Kind Of Magic etc, but I don't think he would have come up with those songs himself in the first place, not to mention SMGO, Innuendo, HTF, IWTBF, AOBTD etc. So I really don't think it holds up. As for Cosmos Rocks, I've only heard it once in 3 sittings, so can't comment yet really, but it's not too far from what I expected at the moment. I never expected it to be like "Queen". It's not going to be is it? A lot of water has gone under the bridge, and RT + BT on their own would'nt have been the same, so if you put PR in the mix, then it definitely won't be. I never expected it to be comparable to current trends (Queen never were anyway), so that isn't relevant (IMO). I'm sure I'll settle with it being around average/above av (weighed against all musical offerings, not against my biased perception of four musicians whose music I love) That's my POV anyway |
gnomo 15.09.2008 13:21 |
Fastguitars wrote: However, as Brian never felt that he was appreciated and still has that axe to grind, i guess that Rog will follow him to the grave or the next stage....whatever comes first...... sorry for pointing out a minor factual inaccuracy, but it is ALLEGEDLY ROGER who insisted that they tour and record together again, and it took him a lot of time (and persistence and effort and luck) to convince Brian to extend the collaboration with Paul further than a few "one-off" live appearances... FWLIW |
PieterMC 15.09.2008 13:30 |
gnomo wrote:I am almost certain Roger is the driving force behind all of this. I remember an interview on Rockline where they were asked what they would be doing after the US tour and Roger said something along the lines of "making an album with these guys". Paul said "We are?"Fastguitars wrote: However, as Brian never felt that he was appreciated and still has that axe to grind, i guess that Rog will follow him to the grave or the next stage....whatever comes first...... sorry for pointing out a minor factual inaccuracy, but it is ALLEGEDLY ROGER who insisted that they tour and record together again, and it took him a lot of time (and persistence and effort and luck) to convince Brian to extend the collaboration with Paul further than a few "one-off" live appearances... FWLIW |
Treasure Moment 15.09.2008 15:35 |
Oberon wrote:i dont doubt that brian,roger and john came up with good song ideas, i just think it was freddie who made the structuring or came up with different ideas that made those songs 10 times better, i really think he was the soul of the band and the reason they got big in the first place, he was something extraordinary.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.I know you think Mr Bad Guy was fantastic, but I really don't. It's ok, but I don't remember it lighting up the world, or reading anything to that effect. Barcelona was a real achievement, but it doesn't really interest me as an album (but i am a rock fan really, so no surprise). the Queen re-works of FM and RT songs were interesting, but I wish they'd been b-sides or on a raities and not on MIH. I'd have preferred MIH to have been an EP of the "new material" But my point is that I don't really think the Mr Bad Guy and Barcelona can be held as evidence that Freddie was that major component in Queen. Obviously important, but I really think it was the combination of the four all acting as each other's quality control that made it work. I'm not denying that Freddie wrote many of their best songs - BoRhap, MOTBQ, STL etc, or that he might have been very instrumental in key songs like Radio Ga Ga, A Kind Of Magic etc, but I don't think he would have come up with those songs himself in the first place, not to mention SMGO, Innuendo, HTF, IWTBF, AOBTD etc. So I really don't think it holds up. As for Cosmos Rocks, I've only heard it once in 3 sittings, so can't comment yet really, but it's not too far from what I expected at the moment. I never expected it to be like "Queen". It's not going to be is it? A lot of water has gone under the bridge, and RT + BT on their own would'nt have been the same, so if you put PR in the mix, then it definitely won't be. I never expected it to be comparable to current trends (Queen never were anyway), so that isn't relevant (IMO). I'm sure I'll settle with it being around average/above av (weighed against all musical offerings, not against my biased perception of four musicians whose music I love) That's my POV anyway |
April 15.09.2008 15:54 |
I absolutely agree that Freddie was a unique talent, an artist distinguished in everything, the soul and heart and driving force of Queen. But he's gone. Now we have a different band, accept the fact. I for one am happy that I can hear and see my favourite Brian and Roger again, they make an effort, they write songs. And, you know, the songs are not that bad, they are good, they are very good! They call themselves Queen? They have the right, they were Queen. Paul R. doesn't do it. So what's the fuss about? This is a new band: Queen+P.R. The question is whether you like it or not. So, do you like the band? |
Treasure Moment 15.09.2008 16:47 |
April wrote: I absolutely agree that Freddie was a unique talent, an artist distinguished in everything, the soul and heart and driving force of Queen. But he's gone. Now we have a different band, accept the fact. I for one am happy that I can hear and see my favourite Brian and Roger again, they make an effort, they write songs. And, you know, the songs are not that bad, they are good, they are very good! They call themselves Queen? They have the right, they were Queen. Paul R. doesn't do it. So what's the fuss about? This is a new band: Queen+P.R. The question is whether you like it or not. So, do you like the band?I dont like it because its bluesy, they didnt make those kinda songs in QUEEN much if any at all and it really is a missmatch, paul doesnt fit in at all, his style is totally different than Queen, also they cant call themselves queen because they arent. they should have just called it brian may, roger taylor and paul rodgers. |
April 15.09.2008 17:15 |
I think they do want to change and are trying to find a new sound. Maybe make it bluesy. And if they changed their name from Queen would you accept them and like them more??? |
Matias Merçeauroix 15.09.2008 17:24 |
We will accept that they are a new band... when they accept themselves as a new band. They (Brian and Roger) are playing under the name of QUEEN. Whatever Paul's input is, it's not the point. If Paul makes his music, it's all ok. He's PAUL RODGERS, a solo artist. But it tomorrow he alone gets together with Cypress Hill (??) and makes a rap album under the name BAD COMPANY+CYPRESS HILL, his fans will be angry because he's selling them something it's not what they're expecting to be. It's not Bad Company and it's not Bad Company's music either. As long as B and R are playing under the QUEEN name, they MUST be judged as Queen because it's clear they still think they're Queen. If you think you're a new band, you might as well get a new name. That's what gives me the creeps, those idiotic "THIS IS A NEW BAND" comments coming from them. If this is a new band, you need a new name. If you think you're Queen, THEN FUCKING SAY IT!! I can't start a band called THE BEATLES and say "NO, THIS IS A NEW BAND". It's a complete contradiction. If they wanna be Queen, they should do what Queen has always done and sound like Queen. This new record has nothing to do with Queen and the band doesn't even sound like Queen, which is much more dissapointing than the songs themselves. Brian May and Roger Taylor play... and don't sound like themselves! That's like so lame. Paul just does his work. But if I were a singer and Queen called me to record an album... I would expect material that actually sounded like Queen, not these songs that sound like any other mediocre band. This is not Queen + Paul Rodgers. This is Paul Rodgers - Queen. They should release it as PAUL RODGERS + BM/RT, because that's what the album is. Cheers, Hor |
Wiley 15.09.2008 17:58 |
I like how they refer to themselves as "Queen AND Paul Rodgers", like if was actually the name of the band. In the Ukraine video they introduce themselves: "Hi, this is Brian May from Queen and Paul Rodgers". I don't fully agree with the New Band, New Name argument. Even if it is valid, I don't hold it against them that they decide otherwise. I wouldn't be as excited (nor anybody else) if they released a new album under another name. Nobody would care, really. Do you think the reviews would be different if it wasn't a "Queen" album? Nobody would care. I can't blame them for prefering to play arenas and mid sized stadiums as Q+PR instead of small theaters as "The May, Taylor and Rodgers Experience". IMO, they are taking a great risk by simply putting themselves in the spotlight again and not only staying home to count their well earned money. |
Treasure Moment 15.09.2008 18:24 |
April wrote: I think they do want to change and are trying to find a new sound. Maybe make it bluesy. And if they changed their name from Queen would you accept them and like them more???I wouldnt like them more but i would respect them alot more |
lalaalalaa 15.09.2008 21:11 |
I'm glad Brian and Roger haven't given up. The band was NEVER Queen+Freddie it was just Queen, 4 equal people. Besides most people forget if it wasn't for Brian and Roger there wouldn't be a Queen in the first place. Brian and Tim Staffell started Smile (pre-Queen). If Brian didn't bother with the Smile project there wouldn't be Queen. |
Ken8 15.09.2008 23:17 |
Zebonka12 wrote: "We Believe" reminds me of John Farnham and "Call Me" reminds me of "Tommy Can You Hear Me?". Bleh.Spot on. I didn't name check Farnham here because I didn't think there'd be many Aussies. Farnham/Queen+Paul Rodgers=Austereo MOR AOR tedium |
The Real Wizard 15.09.2008 23:51 |
Treasure Moment wrote:In case you missed the news, Queen + Paul Rodgers just played to 350,000 people a few nights ago. They're doing just fine without your respect.April wrote: I think they do want to change and are trying to find a new sound. Maybe make it bluesy. And if they changed their name from Queen would you accept them and like them more???I wouldnt like them more but i would respect them alot more |
john bodega 16.09.2008 01:35 |
I've been watching the Kharkov gig on Youtube, in no particular order. GOD they've got to get that guy in the headband *AWAY* from the mic. I know that they get extra musicians to take some of the workload off Brian and Roger, but this bloke is making the harmonies sound terrible. I'll get strung up for even suggesting that Brian should sing "I Want It All" from now on, but I can't stand the way Paul Rodgers sings "hair's to the future". Makes no sense. |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 03:14 |
Sir GH wrote:wow! they did? was it a free concert because i HIGHLY doubt that many people would PAY to see them.Treasure Moment wrote:In case you missed the news, Queen + Paul Rodgers just played to 350,000 people a few nights ago. They're doing just fine without your respect.April wrote: I think they do want to change and are trying to find a new sound. Maybe make it bluesy. And if they changed their name from Queen would you accept them and like them more???I wouldnt like them more but i would respect them alot more |
Celebration82 16.09.2008 03:35 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.I have to disagree. Queen were Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John; they all were equally important. Yes, they lost an integral part of the band when Freddie died, but a lot of really big Queen songs were written by the other members. I like the new album, but it's not Queen. There's only half of the band there (it would have been more Queen if John was involved), and Paul sort of directed the band away from their signature sound. It's more a solo Brian and Roger album with Paul involved than a new Queen album. |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 03:50 |
Celebration82 wrote:you dont understand what im saying, i mean that though the others wrote songs it was freddies input that made them that good, his influence over the band. for example, radio gaga, its a kind of magic, one vision, he controlled everything, he was the soul of the band.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddies solo albums could have easily been Queen albums and in fact several of his solo songs are used as Queen songs. Freddie was the soul of Queen and the one who made them what they are, thats just a fact.I have to disagree. Queen were Freddie, Brian, Roger, and John; they all were equally important. Yes, they lost an integral part of the band when Freddie died, but a lot of really big Queen songs were written by the other members. I like the new album, but it's not Queen. There's only half of the band there (it would have been more Queen if John was involved), and Paul sort of directed the band away from their signature sound. It's more a solo Brian and Roger album with Paul involved than a new Queen album. |
bathump 16.09.2008 04:15 |
I'm confused with Bad Horsies comments that they should use a new name, they have haven't they. The name is Queen + Paul Rodgers, the old name was Queen. You must get really mad that the Queens of the Stone Ages or Queen Latifah are ruining Queens legacy then. I think it is a good album and above expectations, no older artists generally bring out ground breaking albums, they just don't and I didn't expect QPR to do so. I just find it very listenable. I was just interested in what the 3 could come up with. I listened to it last night and tried to imagine Freddie singing them. Some I could and some I couldn't. People forget that Queens album in the 80's were very patchy,songs had bad lyrics and were very bland (and Freddie was to blame for some of them). From a fan whose first lp was Queen II, A Kind of Magic is terrible, as is most of the Miracle. What I like about this album is that Brian has been allowed to play guitar, on the albums of the 80's and 90's there were many songs where he never played (apart from a small solo). That is why my favourite album from the 80's and 90's is Made in Heaven, it had the 70's Queen sound(apart from You Don't Fool Me) i.e Piano , guitar, bass and drums. This album is the same. Ps I know many people don't like the song Cosmos Rocking but it is one of the songs I could imagine Freddie singing very Headlong/Breakthru. Ta |
emrabt 16.09.2008 04:52 |
Treasure Moment wrote: you dont understand what im saying, i mean that though the others wrote songs it was freddies input that made them that good, his influence over the band. for example, radio gaga, its a kind of magic, one vision, he controlled everything, he was the soul of the band.If Freddie's input was the only thing that made the songs good, explain the songs on Made in Heaven or No One but You. If anything this proves John Deacon was the one who kept the band producing to a high standard. In fact Queens general production quality has dropped since John left. |
new one 16.09.2008 05:16 |
I disaggree about them ruining there legacy and anyway is it not there legacy to do with what they please. Whats the point in changing the name of the band to then go out on tour playing 60 or 70% queen material from the Freddie days? Its an ongoing and facinating argument but one than will never be solved. I for one never thought we'd see them out on tour again never mind making a new record. Brian and Roger always loved the live aspect of queen and that was robbed from them in tragic circumstances when dear Freddie got sick. I don't blame them for wanting to continue as the same band rather than just solo artists. They could have gone out with Robbie Williams or some other numpty trying to impersonate Freddie and would probably be filling the likes of Wembley stadium with tiny boppers wondering when are they going to play Angles? Instead they've gone out wiith one of the most respected voices in rock music who does not try to be Freddie and brings something new to the table. Is it the same? Well of bloody course its not, I'd love to have Freddie back but barring some back to the future comes to life scenario thats not going to happen. This version of queen is better than no queen at all as far as I'm concerned and having seen them live and listened to the album I don't think they have anything to be ashamed of. At the end of the day its just music, theres a lot more going on in the world for us all to worry about I'm sure. Just look at that clown sitting in the white house, if he can be the president of the United States and get away with it then surely Brian and Roger can be queen without too much hassle. That time will come, one day you'll see, when we can all be friends!! Group hug!! |
Rik&Roll 16.09.2008 05:54 |
The voice of Paul Rodgers is good enough, the Kharkov-show made that clear. The name they use isn't very interesting. My disappointment lies in the songwriting of the new album. It's been a long while since Roger wrote an outstanding song, but Brian can do much better. Why didn't they wait until they gor a few songs as strong as Resurection, Business, The Call? TCR is played well, but it lacks a highlight. |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 06:11 |
emrabt wrote:whats there to explain, the material on made in heaven came from stuff freddie did before he died and they just put them together here and there, some songs are from freddies solo album. No one but you however is a great song that they did by themselves.Treasure Moment wrote: you dont understand what im saying, i mean that though the others wrote songs it was freddies input that made them that good, his influence over the band. for example, radio gaga, its a kind of magic, one vision, he controlled everything, he was the soul of the band.If Freddie's input was the only thing that made the songs good, explain the songs on Made in Heaven or No One but You. If anything this proves John Deacon was the one who kept the band producing to a high standard. In fact Queens general production quality has dropped since John left. |
emrabt 16.09.2008 06:25 |
Treasure Moment wrote: whats there to explain, the material on made in heaven came from stuff freddie did before he died and they just put them together here and there, some songs are from freddies solo album. No one but you however is a great song that they did by themselves.Thank you, you have just admited that Brian, Roger and John COULD make great sounding music without Freddie. |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 06:55 |
emrabt wrote:haha i did? if making a WHOLE album based on stuff they made with freddie before he died and then put the pieces together here and there then yeah haha.Treasure Moment wrote: whats there to explain, the material on made in heaven came from stuff freddie did before he died and they just put them together here and there, some songs are from freddies solo album. No one but you however is a great song that they did by themselves.Thank you, you have just admited that Brian, Roger and John COULD make great queen sounding music without Freddie. |
emrabt 16.09.2008 07:10 |
Treasure Moment wrote: haha i did? if making a WHOLE album based on stuff they made with freddie before he died and then put the pieces together here and there then yeah haha.Treasure Moment wrote: No one but you however is a great song that they did by themselves. NO ONE BUT YOU however is A GREAT SONG that they did by themselves. NO ONE BUT YOU HOWEVER IS A GREAT SONG THAT THEY DID BY THEMSELVES.Yes you did "NO ONE BUT YOU" = Last "Queen Song" "Great" = you liked it more than average "BY THemselves" = an emphatic form of them or they, in this case refering to John, roger and Brian May and excluding the band member Known as Freddie |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 07:23 |
emrabt wrote:thats a song, not a whole albumTreasure Moment wrote: haha i did? if making a WHOLE album based on stuff they made with freddie before he died and then put the pieces together here and there then yeah haha.Treasure Moment wrote:No one but you however is a great song that they did by themselves.NO ONE BUT YOU however is A GREAT SONG that they did by themselves.NO ONE BUT YOU HOWEVER IS A GREAT SONG THAT THEY DID BY THEMSELVES.Yes you did |
emrabt 16.09.2008 07:46 |
Treasure Moment wrote: thats a song, not a whole albumThe album has nothing to do with it, our conversation never brought up an album. You admitted, in your own words, right here on this message board, that JOHN BRIAN AND ROGER made good music without Freddie, weather it's a song or and album is irrelevant. If you were talking about an album why bring this up: Treasure Moment wrote: you dont understand what im saying, i mean that though the others wrote songs it was freddies input that made them that good, his influence over the band. for example, radio gaga, its a kind of magic, one vision, he controlled everything, he was the soul of the band.This can’t be true because you admitted that No One But You is great, but how could it be great if Freddie controlled the band. You can't deny Freddie had NO INPUT INTO THAT SONG. Your logic is very flawed, it makes no sense. |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 07:58 |
emrabt wrote:well ok, i never said they couldnt write songs, i told you before that i think freddie made their songs 10 times better than without him. Of course they had great ideas and now and then could write a good song but nowhere near as many as freddie helped them with.Treasure Moment wrote: thats a song, not a whole albumThe album has nothing to do with it, our conversation never brought up an album. You admitted, in your own words, right here on this message board, that JOHN BRIAN AND ROGER made good music without Freddie, weather it's a song or and album is irrelevant. If you were talking about an album why bring this up:Treasure Moment wrote: you dont understand what im saying, i mean that though the others wrote songs it was freddies input that made them that good, his influence over the band. for example, radio gaga, its a kind of magic, one vision, he controlled everything, he was the soul of the band.This can’t be true because you admitted that No One But You is great, but how could it be great if Freddie controlled the band. You can't deny Freddie had NO INPUT INTO THAT SONG. Your logic is very flawed, it makes no sense. They are all talented, its just that freddie in on another level. |
Holly2003 16.09.2008 08:12 |
Treasure Moment wrote: [QUOTE i think freddie made their songs 10 times better than without him. Of course they had great ideas and now and then could write a good song but nowhere near as many as freddie helped them with.Your repeat this to the point of tedium so let's have some proof. Start with Queen 1 and give me a number of examples from each album, where Freddie has taken an original idea from John, Brian and Roger and made it "10 times better". |
john bodega 16.09.2008 08:14 |
bathump wrote: Ps I know many people don't like the song Cosmos Rocking but it is one of the songs I could imagine Freddie singing very Headlong/Breakthru. TaI'd be thinking more like "I Go Crazy". Freddie doing his husky rock voice on Cosmos Rocking probably would've worked. My opinion on the new album is shifting and changing a lot, simply because it's new and I haven't really analysed it in depth yet.... my gut reaction at the moment is that it's really the lyrics that are bothering me. I don't like hearing the words 'Saturday night' in a song, unless it's actually the Elton John song. I also don't like it when people rhyme 'street', 'feet', or 'beat'. It's just so bland. The music on the new album is average to slightly above average, really, but the lyrics are the real letdown for me. Even when I can appreciate the sentiment (like in "We Believe") the words are done with a total lack of subtlety. |
emrabt 16.09.2008 10:16 |
Treasure Moment wrote: well ok, i never said they couldnt write songs, i told you before that i think freddie made their songs 10 times better than without him. Of course they had great ideas and now and then could write a good song but nowhere near as many as freddie helped them with. They are all talented, its just that freddie in on another level.Okay, you have gone from saying freddie is the reason all queens songs are fantastic, to saying the others had some good ideas. Just so you know: Heaven for everyone and too much love will kill you Had no Freddie input, apart from a vocal track. It's a beautiful day was just vocals and piano. Let me live was Freddie a piano and rod Stewart. That’s at least 4 songs from made in heaven that had no real input from Freddie, all the music was put together years after he died. This is a BIG chunk of made in heaven without Freddie (even more so if you include you don't fool me), but how does it sound so good without him? It's okay, i don't expect you to say, "because the others spent alot of time on" or "because it took all of them to form the band, so all along the other were pulling their weight too" |
kingogre 16.09.2008 10:30 |
From what Ive heard at least, large parts of MIH was spliced together from little pieces. Let me live was only a short vocal track from a jam-session, you dont fool me was presumably only a few vocal lines, Mother love, beatiful day and a winters tale was loosely recorded. Of the Freddie solo songs Made in heaven is imprived on a lot, while I personally think that IWBTLY could have been better if theyd developed the rock idea more instead of making it a disco/rock hybrid. Apparently John and Roger had done many things radically different before Brian joined them, so it must have been a large effort they put in to change what was presumably mostly scraps into functioning album. This is something that Brian has also testified to, saying that it was not unlike a jigsaw puzzle. However they did a very good work, the songs that works the least are actually those that was brought in more or less unchanged |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 10:35 |
emrabt wrote:its a beautiful day was JUST piano and vocals? its that basically the whole song? if freddie did the piano on let me live its basically his song isnt it?Treasure Moment wrote: well ok, i never said they couldnt write songs, i told you before that i think freddie made their songs 10 times better than without him. Of course they had great ideas and now and then could write a good song but nowhere near as many as freddie helped them with. They are all talented, its just that freddie in on another level.Okay, you have gone from saying freddie is the reason all queens songs are fantastic, to saying the others had some good ideas. Just so you know: Heaven for everyone and too much love will kill you Had no Freddie input, apart from a vocal track. It's a beautiful day was just vocals and piano. Let me live was Freddie a piano and rod Stewart. That’s at least 4 songs from made in heaven that had no real input from Freddie, all the music was put together years after he died. This is a BIG chunk of made in heaven without Freddie, but how does it sound so good without him? ive said it 100 times, they have talent but clearly not as freddie, listen to cosmos rocks. |
emrabt 16.09.2008 11:00 |
Treasure Moment wrote: its a beautiful day was JUST piano and vocals? its that basically the whole song? if freddie did the piano on let me live its basically his song isnt it? ive said it 100 times, they have talent but clearly not as freddie, listen to cosmos rocks.Okay im getting nowhere. You skip over bits of my post. if freddie did the piano on let me live its basically his song isnt it?No, a few lyrics and some piano does not make the song; the song was gospel with 3 more verses added to it when it finished. If I played a few bars on the piano, then someone came along and contributed to what I did, it would be collaboration. if they expanded it into something new then it would be there song. its a beautiful day was JUST piano and vocals?There was loads of those Synths you love, all over those two tracks, I bet Brian did that. listen to cosmos rocksFor the last time, stop bringing up the cosmos rocks, this has nothing to do with our argument. It’s like me saying listen to “Love Is The Hero”. If we bring the cosmos rocks into it, then I say the lack of quality is because of the lack of John Deacon. Queen 1 right through to made in heaven (including no one but you) were very "queen" sounding, you admitted that. Now tell me who is the ONLY person missing between made in heaven and now? Freddie was a great singer, but he was an average composer of music compared to other people out there. he hardly had any idea of how to express himself on the guitar, for example. (This in my opinion) I feel this really shows through on Mr Bad guy, don’t shout at me, it’s an opinion) This isn’t his fault; he was brought up playing the piano. It took to four of them, not just Freddie to make the albums. |
Holly2003 16.09.2008 11:02 |
Treasure Moment wrote:its a beautiful day was JUST piano and vocals? its that basically the whole song? if freddie did the piano on let me live its basically his song isnt it? ive said it 100 times, they have talent but clearly not as freddie, listen to cosmos rocks.Once again you've been asked to 'put up or shut up' and you've chosen the latter. |
Rik&Roll 16.09.2008 11:04 |
After the release of Jazz, it took Freddie about twelve years to write a descent song... I agree that Cosmos is dissapointing, but you're puhing it too far. |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 11:41 |
emrabt wrote:yeah freddie was an average composer of music, he ONLY wrote the biggest song in the world which happenes to be very complex.Treasure Moment wrote: its a beautiful day was JUST piano and vocals? its that basically the whole song? if freddie did the piano on let me live its basically his song isnt it? ive said it 100 times, they have talent but clearly not as freddie, listen to cosmos rocks.Okay im getting nowhere. You skip over bits of my post.if freddie did the piano on let me live its basically his song isnt it?No, a few lyrics and some piano does not make the song; the song was gospel with 3 more verses added to it when it finished. If I played a few bars on the piano, then someone came along and contributed to what I did, it would be collaboration. if they expanded it into something new then it would be there song.its a beautiful day was JUST piano and vocals?There was loads of those Synths you love, all over those two tracks, I bet Brian did that.listen to cosmos rocksFor the last time, stop bringing up the cosmos rocks, this has nothing to do with our argument. It’s like me saying listen to “Love Is The Hero”. If we bring the cosmos rocks into it, then I say the lack of quality is because of the lack of John Deacon. Queen 1 right through to made in heaven (including no one but you) were very "queen" sounding, you admitted that. Now tell me who is the ONLY person missing between made in heaven and now? Freddie was a great singer, but he was an average composer of music; he hardly had any idea of how to express himself on the guitar, for example. (This in my opinion) I feel this really shows through on Mr Bad guy, don’t shout at me, it’s an opinion) This isn’t his fault; he was brought up playing the piano. It took to four of them, not just Freddie to make the albums. |
pittrek 16.09.2008 11:58 |
What ? Did Freddie compose Stairway To Heaven ? |
emrabt 16.09.2008 12:00 |
yeah freddie was an average composer of music, he ONLY wrote the biggest song in the world which happenes to be very complex.The biggest song IN THE WORLD? where did you get that from. surely this disney owned song "HAppY Birthday to you" is more widely known? which happenes to be very complexno more complex than some of the beatles stuff, or maybe one of tim rices musicals. i said freddy was a pretty average composer, which in my opinion was true. |
Holly2003 16.09.2008 12:01 |
Holly2003 wrote:** tumbleweed **Treasure Moment wrote: [QUOTE i think freddie made their songs 10 times better than without him. Of course they had great ideas and now and then could write a good song but nowhere near as many as freddie helped them with.Your repeat this to the point of tedium so let's have some proof. Start with Queen 1 and give me a number of examples from each album, where Freddie has taken an original idea from John, Brian and Roger and made it "10 times better". |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 12:10 |
emrabt wrote:you are silly, he was faaaar away from average, you think writing something like bohemian rhapsody is average?! hahayeah freddie was an average composer of music, he ONLY wrote the biggest song in the world which happenes to be very complex.The biggest song IN THE WORLD? where did you get that from. surely this disney owned song "HAppY Birthday to you" is more widely known?which happenes to be very complexno more complex than some of the beatles stuff, or maybe one of tim rices musicals. i said freddy was a pretty average composer, which in my opinion was true. the beatles? they are amaterus, i heard 20 of their songs and they all sucked, overhyped amateurs. |
The Real Wizard 16.09.2008 12:22 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Let me know when 350 people come to see your band for free.Sir GH wrote:wow! they did? was it a free concert because i HIGHLY doubt that many people would PAY to see them.Treasure Moment wrote:In case you missed the news, Queen + Paul Rodgers just played to 350,000 people a few nights ago. They're doing just fine without your respect.April wrote: I think they do want to change and are trying to find a new sound. Maybe make it bluesy. And if they changed their name from Queen would you accept them and like them more???I wouldnt like them more but i would respect them alot more though the others wrote songs it was freddies input that made them that good, his influence over the band. for example, radio gaga, its a kind of magic, one vision, he controlled everything, he was the soul of the band.3 songs out of 150 or so... that's hardly a reason to claim Freddie was *always* in control, not to mention that these three songs only cover 2 albums out of 15. The only true experts on what happened in the studio over the years are the members of the band, producers, engineers, etc. Not you. As for the new album... it's the remaining members of Queen, just like Division Bell was the remaining members of Pink Floyd, and Endless Wire was the remaining members of The Who... or even Drama was Yes. It's amazing how some people have the audacity to even think they should have a say as to what musicians should do with their own bands after members leave or die. The Cosmos Rocks doesn't sound like old Queen because they don't want it to. Brian proved on his solo records that he can sound like Queen all on his own. They have nothing to prove to the world because they proved it decades ago. They don't need to make a Queen-sounding record because a few disgruntled fans think they should. They created an album that they wanted to create, and they don't need you to like it. If you want to hear Queen, listen to the old Queen albums and enjoy. |
kingogre 16.09.2008 12:23 |
You heard 20 of their songs and by that you can determine that the biggest and most influential music group of the 20th century are overhyped amateurs... |
emrabt 16.09.2008 12:26 |
Treasure Moment wrote: you are silly, he was faaaar away from average, you think writing something like bohemian rhapsody is average?! haha the Beatles? they are amateurs, i heard 20 of their songs and they all sucked, over hyped amateurs.We were having a really good discussion, we really were. Now suddenly, you flip out and start name calling. I was starting to gain some respect for you, then you suddenly clam your opinion is fact and tell me i'm "silly". do you know what the word opinion means? And you never even TRIED to answer my question: Queen 1 right through to made in heaven (including no one but you) were very "queen" sounding, you admitted that. Now tell me who is the ONLY person missing between made in heaven (and no one but you)and now?If the Beatles are over hyped, they are over hyped by thousands of people (including Freddie Mercury). unlike your band, which is over hyped by only YOU. |
April 16.09.2008 16:49 |
I absolutely agree with what Sir GH has written. And whatever you say the band does have a new name Queen+Paul Rodgers. Everyone understands it as new and some of my friends who are not Queen fans asked me why should I go to the concert cause it's not Queen that will be singing, it's Q+PR. You see, people distinguish between the old band and the new one. So the trick is that this is not Queen, but at the same time it is Queen! We can't deny it! And in this ambiguity lies the attraction. I've heard that most songs of the new album were written by Roger. Is it true? |
Matias Merçeauroix 16.09.2008 16:53 |
FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, Hor |
Treasure Moment 16.09.2008 17:29 |
Bad Horsie wrote: FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, Horyeah he apparently is an average composer, i mean he only did simple songs children could write like bohemian rhapsody. |
Ken8 16.09.2008 22:08 |
Bad Horsie wrote: FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, HorBecause the sheep are so in awe of a very average piece of work, The Cosmos Rocks, their defence of it is to drag Fred down to that level of mediocrity. Yeah, Queen "fans" apparently. Pathetic and desperate, and will only get worse as the bad reviews continue as the album slides into oblivion and the current band becomes a laughing stock. |
emrabt 17.09.2008 03:31 |
Ken8 wrote:Hey, it was me who said "Freddie was a pretty average composer, COMPARED TO OTHER COMPOSERS OUT THERE. There are people who can arrange music better than him, he was not super human, for example he couldn't express himself on the guitar, he had to do it on the piano and Brian had to translate.Bad Horsie wrote: FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, HorBecause the sheep are so in awe of a very average piece of work, The Cosmos Rocks, their defence of it is to drag Fred down to that level of mediocrity. Yeah, Queen "fans" apparently. Pathetic and desperate, and will only get worse as the bad reviews continue as the album slides into oblivion and the current band becomes a laughing stock. It took 4 people to make queen. And it is my opinion, I stand by that, I’ve said it before too. This has nothing to do with people who like "the cosmos rocks." In fact several times during this Discussion with treasure moment I’ve told him to stop brining it up. Thinking about it composer probably isn't the right word, in fact i don't know the right word. |
mike hunt 17.09.2008 03:55 |
Ken8 wrote:from what I heard the cosmo rocks isn't mediocrity, it's Just plain bad. the album makes hot space and the works sound like masterpieces. Brian and roger have really lost it. Freddie mercury is An average composer?...He must mean a very underated composer. this is a man that wrote a combination of great hits, and lots of underated gems like the 'black side' on queen2.Bad Horsie wrote: FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, HorBecause the sheep are so in awe of a very average piece of work, The Cosmos Rocks, their defence of it is to drag Fred down to that level of mediocrity. Yeah, Queen "fans" apparently. Pathetic and desperate, and will only get worse as the bad reviews continue as the album slides into oblivion and the current band becomes a laughing stock. |
gnomo 17.09.2008 04:54 |
Sir GH wrote: They created album album that they wanted to create, and they don't need you to like it.... agree totally ... |
john bodega 17.09.2008 05:15 |
mike hunt wrote: the album makes hot space and the works sound like masterpieces.Oh sure..... Tear it Up and I Go Crazy were real art by comparison :/ Look; you don't have to like the new album, but exaggerating the quality of old songs doesn't really strengthen your argument. Tell people what you actually think what is wrong with the music. Stupid comparisons like this are just bound to start arguments and make you look like a dick. For the record, I don't like the new album much either. |
kingogre 17.09.2008 05:25 |
I like the album, parts of it far exceed what I thought theyd be able to come up it. It has its dodgy moments for sure, but on the whole it doesnt matter for me at least. It is not their magnum opus, but I can personally see many of the songs fitting nicely into anything they did in the past. That said I can very much understand if some people do not like it, depending on why you like Queen in the first place. If you like the 80s pop-queen or the progressive opera sounds of the early 70s and that is your idea of Queen for example, then Id say youd be disappointed in this. But please accept that some people actually likes this work, for what it is and despite the (to me few) warts. |
Matias Merçeauroix 17.09.2008 05:30 |
emrabt wrote:So he's an average composer because he couldn't play the guitar.Ken8 wrote:Hey, it was me who said "Freddie was a pretty average composer, COMPARED TO OTHER COMPOSERS OUT THERE. There are people who can arrange music better than him, he was not super human, for example he couldn't express himself on the guitar, he had to do it on the piano and Brian had to translate. It took 4 people to make queen. And it is my opinion, I stand by that, I’ve said it before too. This has nothing to do with people who like "the cosmos rocks." In fact several times during this Discussion with treasure moment I’ve told him to stop brining it up. Thinking about it composer probably isn't the right word, in fact i don't know the right word.Bad Horsie wrote: FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, HorBecause the sheep are so in awe of a very average piece of work, The Cosmos Rocks, their defence of it is to drag Fred down to that level of mediocrity. Yeah, Queen "fans" apparently. Pathetic and desperate, and will only get worse as the bad reviews continue as the album slides into oblivion and the current band becomes a laughing stock. THAT SOUNDS SO RIGHT!!! Mozart didn't play the guitar... SO HE'S AN AVERAGE COMPOSER TOO!!! So... I do play the guitar... that means... I'M DA BEEEZT!!!!! (Now being serious, Mozart didn't play all the instruments he wrote for... and that has absolutely nothing to do with his skills as a composer. Nothing at all). Now I would like to hear, compared to WHO is Freddie an average composer? Give me as many names as you can. Cheers, Hor |
kingogre 17.09.2008 05:37 |
Beethoven???;) |
emrabt 17.09.2008 05:41 |
Now I would like to hear, compared to WHO is Freddie an average composer? Give me as many names as you can. Cheers, Horas i have said composer probably wasn't the right word, i can't think of the word i mean. but AGAIN, this list you asked for would just be my opinion, which you will take and argue against. You see neither of us can win, because we are both right, it's all opinion. where some people like complicated arangements ohters might like to keep things simple. For example: if I said Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim rice can make music which has both the heart and sole of what they are conveying, they can lift any scene with a few simple notes. You would come back and say something like “they suck”, see it’s opinion. Or I could say, I feel the Sherman Brothers are fantastic at displaying humour using only styles of music. You might not agree with it, but that doesn’t make it wrong, it just makes us have different opinions. Don't get me wrong, I think we all know that without Freddie smile would have died, Queen would never have become Queen, he Definitely made the band his own, with his style, but he WAS ONLY HUMAN. Without him we wouldn’t have had the 3 decades of the band we love. After all, in the seventies he had the gift of knowing what people wanted to hear, before “the people” knew. It still doesn't change my opinion, but does it matter? he made still fantastic music. |
kingogre 17.09.2008 06:11 |
Beethoven was deaf and still wrote symphonies, thats genious for you. Freddie couldnt have written Rain must fall if he was deaf. But I dont care really. I still love the music he made when he was at the top of his game. The real man behind all this silly hype was far more interesting and deserved far better than this. |
john bodega 17.09.2008 06:12 |
I change my mind link It's a great album |
Treasure Moment 17.09.2008 09:00 |
emrabt wrote:he was super human, you are an ignorant fool who knows nothing about real music. Freddie was the best singer and frontman of all time, also excellent musician beyond any other mainstream band that ever made it big. He was and is in his own league all alone there forever and no one can beat him EVER!Ken8 wrote:Hey, it was me who said "Freddie was a pretty average composer, COMPARED TO OTHER COMPOSERS OUT THERE. There are people who can arrange music better than him, he was not super human, for example he couldn't express himself on the guitar, he had to do it on the piano and Brian had to translate. It took 4 people to make queen. And it is my opinion, I stand by that, I’ve said it before too. This has nothing to do with people who like "the cosmos rocks." In fact several times during this Discussion with treasure moment I’ve told him to stop brining it up. Thinking about it composer probably isn't the right word, in fact i don't know the right word.Bad Horsie wrote: FREDDIE AN AVERAGE COMPOSER?!?!?!? WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THE WORLD?!?!?!?! Cheers, HorBecause the sheep are so in awe of a very average piece of work, The Cosmos Rocks, their defence of it is to drag Fred down to that level of mediocrity. Yeah, Queen "fans" apparently. Pathetic and desperate, and will only get worse as the bad reviews continue as the album slides into oblivion and the current band becomes a laughing stock. |
emrabt 17.09.2008 09:10 |
yes treasure moment, you are right, how could i have been so blind? has anyone ever told you look and sound just like freddie? maybe in another life....... you have inspired me, i'm going to quit the band i'm in and set up a new band, following in your footsteps, yes my dream. I mean it, as soon a queenzone will let me update my singnature it will read: "TIC's AWAY": Continuing TREASURE MOMENTs footsteps. |
Matias Merçeauroix 17.09.2008 13:05 |
emrabt wrote:Alright, Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice are great composers indeed.Now I would like to hear, compared to WHO is Freddie an average composer? Give me as many names as you can. Cheers, Horas i have said composer probably wasn't the right word, i can't think of the word i mean. but AGAIN, this list you asked for would just be my opinion, which you will take and argue against. You see neither of us can win, because we are both right, it's all opinion. where some people like complicated arangements ohters might like to keep things simple. For example: if I said Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim rice can make music which has both the heart and sole of what they are conveying, they can lift any scene with a few simple notes. You would come back and say something like “they suck”, see it’s opinion. Or I could say, I feel the Sherman Brothers are fantastic at displaying humour using only styles of music. You might not agree with it, but that doesn’t make it wrong, it just makes us have different opinions. Don't get me wrong, I think we all know that without Freddie smile would have died, Queen would never have become Queen, he Definitely made the band his own, with his style, but he WAS ONLY HUMAN. Without him we wouldn’t have had the 3 decades of the band we love. After all, in the seventies he had the gift of knowing what people wanted to hear, before “the people” knew. It still doesn't change my opinion, but does it matter? he made still fantastic music. Does that mean Freddie's an average composer? You gave me only two names... let's say he's the third. He's still fucking good. Now unless you name 2000 composers within contemporary music... Freddie is not average. AND EVEN IF YOU DID, Freddie is still not average. He was a great composer/arranger. Much better than the average composer. Not only for the cleverness he used to put in his works but also for his originality and great melodic content. Cheers, Hor |
emrabt 17.09.2008 13:54 |
Did you read what I put, it doesn't matter how many names I put down, we will ALWAYS disagree, there is nothing wrong with that, that’s what an opinion is. no two people will ever feel the same way about EVERYTHING. |
Matias Merçeauroix 17.09.2008 14:59 |
Ok, if you're comparing composers and say it's a matter of taste, I should really take it as you don't know what you're talking about. Cheers, Hor |
April 17.09.2008 15:29 |
Freddie was a great composer, a great singer, a great talent. By birth! When Tim first brought him to the college's hall to meet Smile, and Freddie sang a powerful energetic song and then improvised singing without words, Tim, Roger and Brian couldn't believe their ears, unable to speak, enchanted by his extraordinary abilities. The peculiar thing is that Freddie at that time was already an accomplished singer, an accomplished artist. He didn't have to change or improve or develop anything in his ways, which means he was an artist from God. A GREAT TALENT! His songs flowed from his heart... |
drwinston 17.09.2008 15:38 |
April wrote: Freddie was a great composer, a great singer, a great talent. By birth! When Tim first brought him to the college's hall to meet Smile, and Freddie sang a powerful energetic song and then improvised singing without words, Tim, Roger and Brian couldn't believe their ears, unable to speak, enchanted by his extraordinary abilities.Where exactly did you hear this story? |
kingogre 17.09.2008 15:39 |
God, you have ridiculous expectations on the poor man.. The funny thing is you dont care about the real Freddie Mercury, instead you choose some kind of God-worship. |
emrabt 17.09.2008 15:54 |
Bad Horsie wrote: Ok, if you're comparing composers and say it's a matter of taste, I should really take it as you don't know what you're talking about. Cheers, HorThis makes no sense, please go back and re-read my posts. I give up anyway, you win, Freddie IS god, you're right, you also can't grasp what an opinion IS, I’ve been telling you all along NO ONE is wrong and no one is right. Also no amount of comparing composers will prove ANYTHING. He could fly too, well, he could hover a few inches about the ground, he lost the ability to fly in the early 80's when he put on a bit of weight. But wait, he didn’t put on weight, sorry I was wrong about that too, how could your god put on weight. |
April 17.09.2008 16:01 |
I read that story in a series of articles called "Informal biographies" (don't remember the author, sorry!). The articles devoted to Freddie are called "Freddie Mercury - Want To Be a Legend". I also remember reading that Tim had pimples all over his face and very bad teeth, and when he smiled somebody from the audience always said: "Close your mouth, Tim!" Ha-ha! So the guys needed a face for the band. When they first saw Freddie, Brian later recalled, they, or rather he, thought: "What a handsome guy! I wish we had such a face in the group, all the girls would go mad..." Concerning Freddie is God statement, I didn't write it. What I wrote is: Freddie is a talent from God, a talent by birth. That's different, isn't it? And why not admire him? I will. and I do. |
emrabt 17.09.2008 16:11 |
April wrote: I read that story in a series of articles called "Informal biographies" (don't remember the author, sorry!). The articles devoted to Freddie are called "Freddie Mercury - Want To Be a Legend". I also remember reading that Tim had pimples all over his face and very bad teeth, and when he smiled somebody from the audience always said: "Close your mouth, Tim!" Ha-ha! So the guys needed a face for the band. When they first saw Freddie, Brian later recalled, they, or rather he, thought: "What a handsome guy! I wish we had such a face in the group, all the girls would go mad..." Concerning Freddie is God statement, I didn't write it. What I wrote is: Freddie is a talent from God, a talent by birth. That's different, isn't it? And why not admire him? I will. and I do.the freddie mercury story made me laugh :). singing without words... lol. |
Matias Merçeauroix 17.09.2008 16:25 |
emrabt wrote:You're an idiot.Bad Horsie wrote: Ok, if you're comparing composers and say it's a matter of taste, I should really take it as you don't know what you're talking about. Cheers, HorThis makes no sense, please go back and re-read my posts. I give up anyway, you win, Freddie IS god, you're right, you also can't grasp what an opinion IS, I’ve been telling you all along NO ONE is wrong and no one is right. Also no amount of comparing composers will prove ANYTHING. He could fly too, well, he could hover a few inches about the ground, he lost the ability to fly in the early 80's when he put on a bit of weight. But weight, he didn’t put on weight, sorry I was wrong about that too, how could your god put on weight. Cheers, Hor |
April 17.09.2008 16:47 |
Singing without words, you know, it's like - la-la-la! I think I am good at it too, aren't I? But, emrabt, it's not good to be so sarcastic about Freddie. People do love him and it's painful to hear someone say rather ugly things about the one you love. Especially it is strange to hear such things from Queen fans themselves. |
Raf 17.09.2008 16:51 |
I was listening to the new album again not long ago. It's excellent, the three guys did a hell of a job. Conservative fans, I'm sorry, but... Freddie who? ;) |
emrabt 17.09.2008 17:20 |
April wrote: Singing without words, you know, it's like - la-la-la! I think I am good at it too, aren't I? But, emrabt, it's not good to be so sarcastic about Freddie. People do love him and it's painful to hear someone say rather ugly things about the one you love. Especially it is strange to hear such things from Queen fans themselves.Hey April, welcome to queenzone i don't think i've met you before. I wasn't being sarcastic, there are people on this message board who really believe Freddie Mercury IS GOD. I don't mind that. What I HATE is when people slam down their opinions as fact, try and convert you to there weird Freddie religion. And if you say anything about Paul Rodgers (if it's good the haters get you, if it's bad then the likers get you) or an opinion about Freddie they shout at you for it. It doesn't have to be anything bad about Freddie either; it could be "Freddie worked day and night all through his early school years learning the piano." They will come and tell you “YOU ARE WRONG, FREDDIE IS GOD BLAH BLAH whole new level." I hate to sound like I’m getting old but when I joined this forum it was full of people who at listened to your opinion, corrected you when you were wrong and helped you when you asked for help. There were some really GREAT conversations, but now many of the oldies have stopped posting because of the Idiots, and we get thread after thread of bashing. The new rules of the forum according to these people (if you post against them, you get the CR*p bashed out of you: 1)PAUL RODGERS IS THE DEVIL 2)FREDDIE IS GOD, HE WAS PERFECT he was born perfect, he never worked his way up, no one could sing better, make better music or live longer. He never made mistakes, he never drank or smoked ETC. 3)BRIAN AND ROGER ARE BAD FOR DOING WHAT THEY LOVE AND GOING ON TOUR 4) NO ONE MATCHES FREDDIE 5) except Treasure moment 6) every week you must try and get around the NO OFFICAL MATERIAL RULE by posting some 7) If asked about John is good, but didn’t do anything to help Freddie and the rest of the band. And I am not the only person who thinks this, there are some great people of the past who never post anymore. This board has become a parody of its former self, it really has. i bet any money you like treasure moment or bad horsie will answer this with "pathetic" or "you can't face the truth" |
April 17.09.2008 17:40 |
What a pity old fans don't post any more! It is they who actually know about Queen and have been observing the development of the group since, imagine that, the early days! I respect them very much! Their opinion is what really matters. However, i don't think it is because of the aggressiveness of some young fans that they have left the forum. I think these aggressive fans should be treated as an attack battalion fighting on the front line to back off any alien fans' attacks. Anyway, they love Freddie and worship him. As for me i don't mind it. What I do mind is when somebody starts putting Freddie down. Maybe some do it to bring those fans to senses, to reason, but actually they just make the fans talk back violently, cause they feel deprived of their love and feel vulnerable because of their excessive love. The only way out is to be tolerant with each other. You're great, emrabt! I liked your post. |
john bodega 17.09.2008 22:52 |
drwinston wrote:Don't be so gullible, that never happened.April wrote: Freddie was a great composer, a great singer, a great talent. By birth! When Tim first brought him to the college's hall to meet Smile, and Freddie sang a powerful energetic song and then improvised singing without words, Tim, Roger and Brian couldn't believe their ears, unable to speak, enchanted by his extraordinary abilities.Where exactly did you hear this story? When Brian and Roger met Freddie he was all ego, and really more of a shouter/screecher than a singer. |
Ken8 17.09.2008 23:27 |
Take the whole Freddie Mercury comparisons out of the argument, inevitable as they are, but hypothetical all the same. By continuing the Queen moniker the band has only invited comparisons with their past, and by changing their sound somewhat I'm not sure of the wisdom in retaining the name, nevermind whether or not they are entitled to the title of Queen, plus or otherwise. The problem is considering the talent involved, The Cosmos Rocks is an average effort at best. And that's the problem. Despite me having reservations about new material with the Queen name, had the album been half good I would consider it a guilty pleasure at the very least. "Return Of The Champions" is hardly a "classic" Queen concert, but it was still a darn good show. Sadly, I don't think Cosmos is a good show and again, considering the rock pedigree involved, that's a tragedy. I still can't get my head around how Brian May solo albums sound more like "Queen" than this new effort. Listening to Cosmos makes you think that musically they're seeking to reach out to the Paul Rodgers fan base more than the Queen one, so I'm not at all surprised the album has been treated more generously by the Rodgers' fanbase. There was more of the spirit of Queen in the expanded TV commercial jingle, "Driven By You" than can be found on this record, and it didn't need to sample WWRY to make the connection clear to listeners.... |
Yara 18.09.2008 06:06 |
emrabt wrote:People tend to mistify the past. It's called nostalgia, isn't it? I understand your plight.April wrote: Singing without words, you know, it's like - la-la-la! I think I am good at it too, aren't I? But, emrabt, it's not good to be so sarcastic about Freddie. People do love him and it's painful to hear someone say rather ugly things about the one you love. Especially it is strange to hear such things from Queen fans themselves.Hey April, welcome to queenzone i don't think i've met you before. I wasn't being sarcastic, there are people on this message board who really believe Freddie Mercury IS GOD. I don't mind that. What I HATE is when people slam down their opinions as fact, try and convert you to there weird Freddie religion. And if you say anything about Paul Rodgers (if it's good the haters get you, if it's bad then the likers get you) or an opinion about Freddie they shout at you for it. It doesn't have to be anything bad about Freddie either; it could be "Freddie worked day and night all through his early school years learning the piano." They will come and tell you “YOU ARE WRONG, FREDDIE IS GOD BLAH BLAH whole new level." I hate to sound like I’m getting old but when I joined this forum it was full of people who at listened to your opinion, corrected you when you were wrong and helped you when you asked for help. There were some really GREAT conversations, but now many of the oldies have stopped posting because of the Idiots, and we get thread after thread of bashing. The new rules of the forum according to these people (if you post against them, you get the CR*p bashed out of you: 1)PAUL RODGERS IS THE DEVIL 2)FREDDIE IS GOD, HE WAS PERFECT he was born perfect, he never worked his way up, no one could sing better, make better music or live longer. He never made mistakes, he never drank or smoked ETC. 3)BRIAN AND ROGER ARE BAD FOR DOING WHAT THEY LOVE AND GOING ON TOUR 4) NO ONE MATCHES FREDDIE 5) except Treasure moment 6) every week you must try and get around the NO OFFICAL MATERIAL RULE by posting some 7) If asked about John is good, but didn’t do anything to help Freddie and the rest of the band. And I am not the only person who thinks this, there are some great people of the past who never post anymore. This board has become a parody of its former self, it really has. i bet any money you like treasure moment or bad horsie will answer this with "pathetic" or "you can't face the truth" Well, no one is saying anything that you're accusing people of saying - that is, except for one or two persons who you may take as the whole when they're only tiny parts of it. No one says Paul Rodgers is devil. There are people, not me, who like him very much as a singer - Sebastian, among others, who do write very thoughtful posts - but don't think Queen should go on with its name after Freddie's demise. And they make sound arguments as to why it is unlikely that Rodgers was Freddie's hero. It's all the intellectual arena, and you'll have a hard time disputing that. There are people who often write thoughtful posts criticizing the way Queen's music has taken. There are lot of people who say Freddie is God, including me. But I expect people to understand irony and realize that all some of us try to convey is the fact that he was a very unique talent, which I think he was. No one said, and really, I don't remember ANYONE saying this ever since I'm here, that Freddie didn't trained - as a musician myself, I know that genius doesn't come without hard work: both come together. Many of the stupid threads are initiated, or fueled, by the "oldies". Some may argue that even Queen's Archivist himself has initiated stupid threads, so why not young fans? Because no one is saying what you say people are saying, I guess there's no point in arguing. If you have a bone to pick with Treasure Moment, I suggest you do it by mail instead of creating fake controversies. And I can present you rational, sensible arguments the whole week as to why I think Freddie was an unique talent, a superb composer and singer and probably one of the greatest popular musicians of the last half of the XX Century. But these are arguments which have everything to do with music, not with things that pass as "music knowledge" here by some of your beloved oldies, I guess. As for BAD HORSIE, he is very bright. In fact, some of the best posts about music I read here were written by him - you may think he's aggressive, ok. But, Lord, are you talking about "being aggressive" on Queenzone? Isn't that the RULE? When I first came here, there was nothing BUT aggression, and much of it by the oldies. So, please, just let it go and avoid creating another fake controversy which will generate hundreds of useless messages. Cheers. |
emrabt 18.09.2008 07:03 |
Yara wrote: When I first came here, there was nothing BUT aggression, and much of it by the oldies. So, please, just let it go and avoid creating another fake controversy which will generate hundreds of useless messages. Cheers.Hey, you are right, and I am to blame, at least for carrying it on too far. I was having a bad day, I think and needed to vent, I’m normally very quiet and hardly post, but things just built up and a little thing set me off. It really wasn’t anything big, I just blew it WAY out of proportion and context, it was very childish. All it's really done is make me look stupid and very hypocritical, nothing can be gained from posting rants, I know. So to both Treasure Moment and Bad Horsie, (plus the person whos thread i hijacked) please except my apologies. I had no right to start page after page of ranting arguments. It was a statment i new would start and argument, i should have kept it to myslef. I also knew no one could win, so there was no point in carrying it on for 4 or 5 pages. |
We Are The Champions 18.09.2008 10:54 |
Treasure Moment wrote: this album sounds more like paul rodgers feat brian may and roger taylor, has nothing to do with Queen whatsoever.I would have to agree. There is a huge Paul influence on this CD - too be expected. There is no characteristic Queen sounding track at all. The Roger songs - there are at least 2 I think - sound like his solo stuff with the Cross. Definitely shades of The Cross on Surf's Up School's out. I do not really rate this album at all in terms of expecting to hear a "Queen" album - a new band with new ideas virtually totally devoid of any Queen trademarks. Yes, you can tell it's Brain on guitar but as a Queen fan myself, you can tell that Freddie had a massive influence on the band's output. Even non penned Freddie songs benefitted from his input - he rearranged many of Roger's songs for example. I wonder if the inclusion of John on bass would have enhanced this CD. Overall, I am quite disappointed with this CD but having said that it's to be expected. Most of the songs have a better live than recorded feel to them. Warboys for example - great live track. I guess we all have to accept the fact that Paul Rodgers has a bigger than expected influence on this new venture. Brian & Roger have had to adapt to a new singer's influence and have penned songs around his capabilities. The CD is however a grower and I have bought it more as a fan of both Roger, Brian and Paul rather than a nostalgic feeling for what Queen really were with the magnificent Freddie mercury as vocalist. |
April 18.09.2008 14:14 |
Emrabt, your 2 last posts show that you ARE a devoted fan, that you are concerned about the objectivity of the forum. |
April 18.09.2008 16:09 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Are you sure of that? I've read that he was an accomplished singer and later didn't even have to work on his voice.drwinston wrote:Don't be so gullible, that never happened. When Brian and Roger met Freddie he was all ego, and really more of a shouter/screecher than a singer.April wrote: Freddie was a great composer, a great singer, a great talent. By birth! When Tim first brought him to the college's hall to meet Smile, and Freddie sang a powerful energetic song and then improvised singing without words, Tim, Roger and Brian couldn't believe their ears, unable to speak, enchanted by his extraordinary abilities.Where exactly did you hear this story? |
john bodega 18.09.2008 23:38 |
I dunno. My version comes from Brian and Roger... not everyone around here trusts those guys memories :P I think that Brian's anecdote of them not being sure if 'this guy can really sing or not' is reliable though, when you listen to the Ibex tapes. As a rock singer he had a long, long way to go back then. |
drwinston 19.09.2008 16:09 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I dunno. My version comes from Brian and Roger... not everyone around here trusts those guys memories :P I think that Brian's anecdote of them not being sure if 'this guy can really sing or not' is reliable though, when you listen to the Ibex tapes. As a rock singer he had a long, long way to go back then.That's pretty much how I remember it as well. I think the book As It Began talks about how he had major problems keeping in tune when singing live. As I recall, Brian and Roger didn't even really want to be in a band with him, but after Smile broke up Freddie was very persistent so they gave it a go - thank goodness.! |
April 19.09.2008 17:09 |
Thanks, guys, i think i've read rather unreliable source. Everybody writing about stars these days, we have to recheck them. |