una999 03.08.2008 08:38 |
So i don't get this. Does this mean Brian is going to save the world..u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life? So fucking annoying, who cares it's bullshit. Can't believe universities waste money and resources (brian could have written a good song instead, the opportunity cost) on such shit. If this was so relevant to human civilisation wouldn't it have been completed by someone else 30 years ago...IF IT COULD WAIT 30 YEARS THAT SHOWS HOW IRRELEVANT IT IS |
Mr Mercury 03.08.2008 08:44 |
It shows how irrelevant it is to YOU. It may not be that way to the hundreds, possibly thousands, of people doing the exact same course that Brian did. It gives them a benchmark to hit and then try and do better. |
john bodega 03.08.2008 08:56 |
Now since when has the pursuit of knowledge been a waste of time? |
thomasquinn 32989 03.08.2008 10:48 |
una999 wrote: So i don't get this. Does this mean Brian is going to save the world..u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life? So fucking annoying, who cares it's bullshit. Can't believe universities waste money and resources (brian could have written a good song instead, the opportunity cost) on such shit. If this was so relevant to human civilisation wouldn't it have been completed by someone else 30 years ago...IF IT COULD WAIT 30 YEARS THAT SHOWS HOW IRRELEVANT IT ISIs what you say *supposed* not to make any sense? If so, you succeeded handsomely. |
una999 03.08.2008 11:03 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Now since when has the pursuit of knowledge been a waste of time?A waste of your money. every year kids are put through college to learn about stuff they don't use in their real jobs. So say 4 years in a typical college course...how expensive is that. College fees, accommodation etc...pretty expensive. But that's not all. These students could be working and adding value to society. Instead they are unproductive and it takes taxes to fund them, so a double blow. College is only needed for a select few courses like medicine, engineering etc... Why spend 4 years doing a business degree, never use any of it, COMMON SENSE rules the world, probably why i am successful |
una999 03.08.2008 11:07 |
to thomas quinn...Really. Why not answer the question besides purposely trying to be i dunno funny is it...maturity? |
thomasquinn 32989 03.08.2008 11:26 |
Why don't you stop being a completely insane fascist. You're anti-intellectualism is reminiscent of nazi-germany ("learning stuff they will never use in their jobs". I bet you like the phrase "when I hear the word 'culture' I reach for my pistol" too), and your constant whining about silly topics decisive evidence that you are a completely useless lifeform. If you can't stop spamming this forum, go hold your head under water until you stop kicking. |
john bodega 03.08.2008 11:37 |
One of my best friends used to ignore his work in Maths completely. "I'm just going to become a tradesman", he'd say. Well - five years later, you know what he said to me? "All that maths and shit they said we'd always need...." I chuckled in anticipation of how he'd finish the sentence. "... I bloody should have been paying attention." That blew me out. Seriously, education might seem like a waste of time to you because you live in a closet and eat through a straw, but to some people it's actually kind of important! |
thomasquinn 32989 03.08.2008 11:39 |
Anti-intellectualism is how stupid people try to feel superior. |
kingogre 03.08.2008 12:04 |
una999 wrote:Science and the pursuit of knowledge is what makes the world move forward. To give people the tools and knowledge to think scientifically and extend our knowledge of the world and question our perceptions of it is one of the best things there is to spend money on.Zebonka12 wrote: Now since when has the pursuit of knowledge been a waste of time?A waste of your money. every year kids are put through college to learn about stuff they don't use in their real jobs. So say 4 years in a typical college course...how expensive is that. College fees, accommodation etc...pretty expensive. But that's not all. These students could be working and adding value to society. Instead they are unproductive and it takes taxes to fund them, so a double blow. College is only needed for a select few courses like medicine, engineering etc... Why spend 4 years doing a business degree, never use any of it, COMMON SENSE rules the world, probably why i am successful On a social level it helps us make our society and the world a better place to live in in a multitude of ways and also makes us question the values and ideas we build it on so to make sure they have a basis in reality. On a personal level it developes us as humans and helps us in our lives. To bring knowledge and the means to aquire to as many people as possible is also the best way to further the democracy of our countries. It helps people understand our society and how they can take part in it and make their voices heard. It also give us the means to question what happens and what people try to make us believe and instead form our own opinions of it. That knowledge is power is true in every sense of the word. It can also be a way for someone to fulfill themselves. I imagine it has long been a dream for Brian to complete his thesis. Because he wants to see what conclusions can be drawn from it and/or to prove to himself that he has what it takes to complete a major thesis like this is. In the last case it is very fulfilling for anyone and gives them great confidence that they can use in their everyday life. To go out in the world and with an open and critical mind see what it is really like is always superior to using unfounded "common sense". |
john bodega 03.08.2008 12:07 |
ThomasQuinn wrote: Anti-intellectualism is how stupid people try to feel superior.Well it sure came back to bite my friend in the arse. |
Queenman!! 03.08.2008 16:05 |
una999 wrote: So i don't get this. Does this mean Brian is going to save the world..u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life? So fucking annoying, who cares it's bullshit. Can't believe universities waste money and resources (brian could have written a good song instead, the opportunity cost) on such shit. If this was so relevant to human civilisation wouldn't it have been completed by someone else 30 years ago...IF IT COULD WAIT 30 YEARS THAT SHOWS HOW IRRELEVANT IT ISOkay... Get your point... but what can YOU learn us?... besides judging on someones passion and mission for working his ass off to get a master degree. |
Raf 03.08.2008 16:34 |
So what if I don't use most things in my actual job? I'm a curious person and I like to learn. Once I got a good job, as soon as I have free time I wanna use it on different courses in University, just for the sake of learning more interesting stuff. Why don't you turn off your computer and go read a book? |
onevsion 03.08.2008 17:00 |
Raf wrote: So what if I don't use most things in my actual job? I'm a curious person and I like to learn. Once I got a good job, as soon as I have free time I wanna use it on different courses in University, just for the sake of learning more interesting stuff. Why don't you turn off your computer and go read a book?Well said. University rocks. |
P-Staker 04.08.2008 04:46 |
This reminds me of the time mah kids wanted to go to the unaversitah. So ah told em, "kids, as my ol pa always said, what good's a unaversitah to ya if you can't eat paper?" Heh, ol' pa was a sharp un. Shame about him checking the barrel of Miss Kitty with his lighter. Anyway, one night ah reckon sumthin funny in the kids room and ah find lil Billy Joe hidin under his blanket one of em books with em scribblings in it. Naturally, out comes Mr Tickler until lil Billy Joe's palms are striped like tomato zebra. Ah sure as hell beat the ideas of unaversitah out of his lil head, ah did. And ah'm thinkin to mahself, shame ah wasn't Brian's pa. A few swings of ol Mr Tickler and Brian would go back to his tractor, no nonsense about astronomah and other bullcrap that brings no food on the table to a decent family! |
Holly2003 04.08.2008 04:59 |
Don't worry una, the service economy of the Repubic of Ireland (and increasingly the UK too) is ideally suited for under-educated drones. There'll always be a job waiting for you at McDonalds or selling tat to tourists. Alternatively Una, some of your fellow countrymen keep Saint oliver Plunkett's head in a glass case. A bottle would be slightly more tacky, but who am I to pass judgement? (ahem) Maybe you're waiting for him to awake and tell you about the secrets of the universe? Personally, until that happens, I'd rather listen to the guy with the PhD. link |
thomasquinn 32989 04.08.2008 08:26 |
To summarize the more intelligent statements (i.e. everything except the posts by Una999): Knowledge is not a means, it is an end. |
una999 04.08.2008 08:28 |
|
una999 04.08.2008 08:28 |
First to Holly2003...i knew immediately before checking that you are from Northern Ireland. And yes I wasn't surprised when you say you're part of the UK (which is true). But it's sad because Northern Ireland is not wanted in the UK it contributes nothing to the UK economy, it costs money to support it. Is Northern Ireland not enough, why add the UK to it, like you don't have people from Scotland saying UK, never understand that. And at least our countrymen created a successful country we didn't rely on the UK Now to everyone else that replied...i can't respond because it is so annoying. All i am going to say is this. Alan Sugar said that kids should be learning how to get business skills in school rather than learning pointless stuff. He said everyone doesn't have to be successful, all you need is 25%, because the other 75% will be the clowns who do the work. To succeed in business you don't need a business degree. Now that's my point...i'm just picking business because there are so many pathetic courses out there...basically horses for courses. Most wealthy people don't have a formal education, but as i said above college is needed for medicine, engineering, |
thomasquinn 32989 04.08.2008 08:42 |
Yes, you distinguish between those "worthy" and "unworthy" of education. A social upper layer, which you graciously extend to 25% of the population, and a subservient 75%. So, I will stand by my nazi-allegations. |
Dan C. 04.08.2008 08:47 |
link |
una999 04.08.2008 08:48 |
Well Thomas not my words, Alan Sugar - called an analogy, figures aren't scientific, used purely for demonstration...ok not empirical |
gnomo 04.08.2008 08:49 |
una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. |
una999 04.08.2008 08:54 |
gnomo wrote:But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. |
kingogre 04.08.2008 09:44 |
Your reasoning certainly has a lot in common with nazism as TQ said. This is a fact and if you do not agree maybe you should have paid more attention during your history lessons, but hey thats probably one of your "useless" subjects.. "I wont answer because it is so annoying..." thats certainly an interesting way to debate.. |
Holly2003 04.08.2008 10:44 |
una999 wrote: First to Holly2003...i knew immediately before checking that you are from Northern Ireland. And yes I wasn't surprised when you say you're part of the UK (which is true). But it's sad because Northern Ireland is not wanted in the UK it contributes nothing to the UK economy, it costs money to support it. Is Northern Ireland not enough, why add the UK to it, like you don't have people from Scotland saying UK, never understand that. And at least our countrymen created a successful country we didn't rely on the UKThanks for sharing. Almost every region in the UK depends financially on London and SE England. I add UK to "it" because it's both true and perfectly natural for me to do so. Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern ireland. Surely even someone as anti-education as you might've picked up on that after 87 years of that being a cast-iron fact. Lastly "Your countrymen" relied heavily on EU subsidies to make the Republic of Ireland into a "Celtic Tiger", which is highly ironic since you appear not to endorse subsidies for Northern Ireland. If there's snything else you'd like to know about Northern Ireland, UK, please consult Plunkett's severed head first: if no reply, I'll be glad to help. |
una999 04.08.2008 16:40 |
Holly2003 wrote:Ha ha i find this funny!! I'm at odds that you keep pointing out that NI is in the UK...i've already stated that point in my previous post.una999 wrote: First to Holly2003...i knew immediately before checking that you are from Northern Ireland. And yes I wasn't surprised when you say you're part of the UK (which is true). But it's sad because Northern Ireland is not wanted in the UK it contributes nothing to the UK economy, it costs money to support it. Is Northern Ireland not enough, why add the UK to it, like you don't have people from Scotland saying UK, never understand that. And at least our countrymen created a successful country we didn't rely on the UKThanks for sharing. Almost every region in the UK depends financially on London and SE England. I add UK to "it" because it's both true and perfectly natural for me to do so. Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern ireland. Surely even someone as anti-education as you might've picked up on that after 87 years of that being a cast-iron fact. Lastly "Your countrymen" relied heavily on EU subsidies to make the Republic of Ireland into a "Celtic Tiger", which is highly ironic since you appear not to endorse subsidies for Northern Ireland. If there's snything else you'd like to know about Northern Ireland, UK, please consult Plunkett's severed head first: if no reply, I'll be glad to help. I don't have a problem with that because the republic doesn't want the North either. Gerry Adams and Sinn Fein are completely out of touch with people in the Republic...I guess you are Unionist. Oh please...that is so lame. If British imperialism didn't get in the way we'd have been years ahead. Just like China has suffered years at the hands of Japanese Imperialism, it hinders growth. Yes we got money from the EU but finally we have turned things around and are now contributing more than we are getting. NI is stuck in the past...want to be part of the UK but you know they (the majority i.e england) don't give a dam!! And at least we created a Tiger economy...what has NI created? And finally I don't know who this Plunkett guy you keep referring to is (doesn't mean not educated, just learnt more relevant stuff in school)...but i checked him up in Wikipedia (not the most reliable source but still) and what does it say...'He maintained his duties in Ireland in the face of English persecution and was eventually arrested and tried for treason'. So if you support presecution that's your business but human rights exist these days. Just like America, the Irish broke free from British rule...guess in our blood, pride, priceless. |
Holly2003 04.08.2008 17:42 |
Help! I'm being oppressed! Remember now Una (Father Ted talking to Dougal) Northern Ireland part of the UK, Republic of Ireland no longer part of UK but keeps priest's head in a bottle. |
P-Staker 04.08.2008 19:47 |
I think the gist of this topic is, Una couldn't get a degree. |
gnomo 05.08.2008 05:25 |
una999 wrote: But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?Zodiacal dust has been somewhat overlooked for decades, while research on the Solar System concentrated on planetary exploration through fly-by or surface probes. BUT, since the search for extra-solar planetary system has progressed, thanks to better instruments, zodiacal dust has become of interest again, because dust clouds are considered the environment in which planets form and develop, so where plenty of dust is, it's likely that planets can be found. Which means that a better knowledge of the structure and dynamics of those dust clouds has NOW become interesting for astronomers again - this time, not those researching "our" planetary system, but those looking for other planetary systems "out there". EDIT: it happens so very often in science, that research done on what is, at the time, a minor, marginally relevant subject in a certain field will prove, later on, of critical importance to key research in a totally different field. That's why science and advancement of knowledge ARE valuable in themselves: what looks insignificant today outside a restricted circle might turn out to be very important for everyone at a later time. HTH |
gnomo 05.08.2008 05:40 |
Case in point: penicillin. Originally noticed by a French medical student, Ernest Duchesne, in 1896. Penicillin was re-discovered by bacteriologist Alexander Fleming working at St. Mary's Hospital in London in 1928. Dr. Fleming in 1929 published the results of his investigations, noting that his discovery might have therapeutic value if it could be produced in quantity. At the time, however, the importance of Alexander Fleming's discovery was not known. Use of penicillin did not begin until the 1940s when Howard Florey and Ernst Chain isolated the active ingredient and developed a powdery form of the medicine. Not saying that BHM's thesis has or might have comparable relevance to that, of course. Just illustrating how science and knowledge usually need some time before their importance becomes widely apparent; especially when hindered by general narrow-mindedness and short-sighted utilitarianism. FWLIW |
una999 05.08.2008 09:11 |
Holly2003 wrote: Help! I'm being oppressed! Remember now Una (Father Ted talking to Dougal) Northern Ireland part of the UK, Republic of Ireland no longer part of UK but keeps priest's head in a bottle.Um...u obviously have some issues with bottles. U know what i love the British. I listen to British music, watch British sport, British TV etc., i generally support Britain, but at least stand for something yourself. The republic of ireland was never part of the UK...that's why it is called a republic!! Northern Ireland is welcome to the UK, but remember it's the South that's successful part of this island. So basically no need to look down on us because there are no grounds for that, i just end up laughing at how pathetic that sounds!! Next you'll say NI has a stronger military than us...then you'll wake up and realise oh it's the UK's military which you can be sure NI has not contributed much...again just hanging onto the UK because i dunno, does it give status, 'at least yer somethin' being part of the UK. United Kindgom...united, how ironic, doesn't scotland want to break away. |
una999 05.08.2008 09:12 |
|
una999 05.08.2008 09:15 |
|
kingogre 05.08.2008 10:08 |
Whats your point una999? Bragging about Ireland? Cause half of what you say is not true and the other half are misunderstandings. You know how I know that? University. |
Holly2003 05.08.2008 10:19 |
una999 wrote:Una, the only one with the inferiority complex is you. I did not say anything derogatory about your wee country, only that its service industry, like that of the UK, is ideally suited to the type of jobs/world you appear to want to see. After all, you are the one who started a thread about the unimportance of education. Your diatribe only proves how wrong you are. If you want to start a shit-flinging thread about NI, RoI, GB etc., I would suggest Queenzone is not the place for that and you should take it elsewhere. However, if a little gentle ribbing for me here has you so defensive, you will be eaten alive on a forum like Slugger O'Toole.Holly2003 wrote: Help! I'm being oppressed! Remember now Una (Father Ted talking to Dougal) Northern Ireland part of the UK, Republic of Ireland no longer part of UK but keeps priest's head in a bottle.Um...u obviously have some issues with bottles. U know what i love the British. I listen to British music, watch British sport, British TV etc., i generally support Britain, but at least stand for something yourself. The republic of ireland was never part of the UK...that's why it is called a republic!! Northern Ireland is welcome to the UK, but remember it's the South that's successful part of this island. So basically no need to look down on us because there are no grounds for that, i just end up laughing at how pathetic that sounds!! Next you'll say NI has a stronger military than us...then you'll wake up and realise oh it's the UK's military which you can be sure NI has not contributed much...again just hanging onto the UK because i dunno, does it give status, 'at least yer somethin' being part of the UK. United Kindgom...united, how ironic, doesn't scotland want to break away. |
thomasquinn 32989 05.08.2008 10:52 |
kingogre wrote: Cause half of what you say is not true and the other half are misunderstandings.Actually, I think that by this line, you are still humoring him/her/it. |
kingogre 05.08.2008 12:17 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:Probably:)kingogre wrote: Cause half of what you say is not true and the other half are misunderstandings.Actually, I think that by this line, you are still humoring him/her/it. Whats all this got to do with Queen anyway? |
john bodega 05.08.2008 13:13 |
una999 wrote: But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?Yeah. It's been 17 years since the last full Queen album. How relevant could it be? In fact, why don't we just cancel any human activity that isn't eating, shitting, sleeping or fucking? Quit your drooling. |
QueenMercury46 05.08.2008 17:41 |
Hey una, link |
una999 06.08.2008 13:27 |
Holly2003 wrote:Well service industry i think more of accountant, solicitors, banking etc. I never said education was not important, i merely said that its focus is wrong...i said we need doctors, engineers etc, but not horses for courses.una999 wrote:Una, the only one with the inferiority complex is you. I did not say anything derogatory about your wee country, only that its service industry, like that of the UK, is ideally suited to the type of jobs/world you appear to want to see. After all, you are the one who started a thread about the unimportance of education. Your diatribe only proves how wrong you are. If you want to start a shit-flinging thread about NI, RoI, GB etc., I would suggest Queenzone is not the place for that and you should take it elsewhere. However, if a little gentle ribbing for me here has you so defensive, you will be eaten alive on a forum like Slugger O'Toole.Holly2003 wrote: Help! I'm being oppressed! Remember now Una (Father Ted talking to Dougal) Northern Ireland part of the UK, Republic of Ireland no longer part of UK but keeps priest's head in a bottle.Um...u obviously have some issues with bottles. U know what i love the British. I listen to British music, watch British sport, British TV etc., i generally support Britain, but at least stand for something yourself. The republic of ireland was never part of the UK...that's why it is called a republic!! Northern Ireland is welcome to the UK, but remember it's the South that's successful part of this island. So basically no need to look down on us because there are no grounds for that, i just end up laughing at how pathetic that sounds!! Next you'll say NI has a stronger military than us...then you'll wake up and realise oh it's the UK's military which you can be sure NI has not contributed much...again just hanging onto the UK because i dunno, does it give status, 'at least yer somethin' being part of the UK. United Kindgom...united, how ironic, doesn't scotland want to break away. Well if i'm eaten alive on this Slugger O'Toole forum (which i have never heard of, but you have so i wonder) i'm sure there are people from the South who are 100million times more passionate about this subject than me who could give as good as they get. That's not my scene, as i said the only problem i have is that you seem to have some superiority complex about putting down the South then saying how you're part of the UK which is so great but what does NI contribute. So if you can't handle a little gentle ribbing maybe you shouldn't be so smug |
una999 06.08.2008 13:41 |
una999 wrote:Holly2003 wrote:Well service industry i think more of accountant, solicitors, banking etc. I never said education was not important, i merely said that its focus is wrong...i said we need doctors, engineers etc, but not horses for courses.una999 wrote:Una, the only one with the inferiority complex is you. I did not say anything derogatory about your wee country, only that its service industry, like that of the UK, is ideally suited to the type of jobs/world you appear to want to see. After all, you are the one who started a thread about the unimportance of education. Your diatribe only proves how wrong you are. If you want to start a shit-flinging thread about NI, RoI, GB etc., I would suggest Queenzone is not the place for that and you should take it elsewhere. However, if a little gentle ribbing for me here has you so defensive, you will be eaten alive on a forum like Slugger O'Toole.Holly2003 wrote: Help! I'm being oppressed! Remember now Una (Father Ted talking to Dougal) Northern Ireland part of the UK, Republic of Ireland no longer part of UK but keeps priest's head in a bottle.Um...u obviously have some issues with bottles. U know what i love the British. I listen to British music, watch British sport, British TV etc., i generally support Britain, but at least stand for something yourself. The republic of ireland was never part of the UK...that's why it is called a republic!! Northern Ireland is welcome to the UK, but remember it's the South that's successful part of this island. So basically no need to look down on us because there are no grounds for that, i just end up laughing at how pathetic that sounds!! Next you'll say NI has a stronger military than us...then you'll wake up and realise oh it's the UK's military which you can be sure NI has not contributed much...again just hanging onto the UK because i dunno, does it give status, 'at least yer somethin' being part of the UK. United Kindgom...united, how ironic, doesn't scotland want to break away. |
una999 06.08.2008 13:41 |
|
una999 06.08.2008 13:46 |
QueenMercury46 wrote: Hey una, linkHow about fuck yourself |
una999 06.08.2008 13:47 |
|
una999 06.08.2008 13:50 |
una999 wrote:Of course i dont mean that because i dont use bad language. Yes that's a good picture but just a picture, u wasted time looking for it, my origional point is still correct and you can't argue against that.QueenMercury46 wrote: Hey una, linkHow about fuck yourself |
Hitman1965 06.08.2008 15:18 |
una999 wrote:Hignomo wrote:But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. Been reading this thread with interest and would like to add the following. Let's have a look at the following dissertation topic - On the Gaussian error function which proved fundamental results on probability theory, namely the central limit theorem. Oh how this one drips off the tongue - I'm sure you agree the title is even easier to remember than Brian's topic. Well let's just take a moment to review this title and piece of research - this is the dissertation of a one Alan Turing (link the famous code breaker who helped change the direction of WWII due to his work at Bletchley Park. I can just hear your comments now on first review of the dissertation title - how irrelevant is this piece of work. I'm sure Alan Turing just shouldn't have bothered after all surely all of the real academic work in computing was researched and completed years before by better and smarter individuals i.e. Charles Babbage (link Using your point of view we'd never make any progress at all - You refer to Alan sugar time and time again - very successful and interesting guy but his success is mainly built on selling Amstrad PC's that other academic's and computing professionals invented and manufactured for him. Your posting is totally ironic - if we used your approach to education we'd all be still banging rocks together. "If something takes 30 years how can it really be relevant." Many academics take a lifetime of work and research only for their work to make an impact many years after their death. You'd not be able to post on this thread without the work of academics such as Turing and Babbage. I'm sure that Brian's research will have an equally important impact in the field of astronomy. Just because you don't grasp the relevance of the work doesn't make it irrelevant. And finally before you start stating that my example refers to computing which is engineering related and thus relevant from your limited perspective I'm sure I could find thousands of other examples in other fields i.e. music, art, etc etc... Learning and research is about making new discoveries not about how much money you can make. Academic research aids the whole of society and makes us what we are. Dismissing the work that Brian's done is a clear example of ignorance and a very limited outlook on life. I'd like to congratulate you on your original posting, it so clearly demonstrates to everyone a lot about yourself and your approach to everyone else - well done! |
QueenMercury46 06.08.2008 15:33 |
una999 wrote:Good idea. Thanks!QueenMercury46 wrote: Hey una, linkHow about fuck yourself |
una999 06.08.2008 16:01 |
Hitman1965 wrote:I must confess i didn't read all that technical stuff...explain this then sir. Queen are pretty much self taught musicians, like most bands. So you could have a trained pianist but he'll never be as successful as freddie mercury...now u see that's if you measure success in terms of money, but i measure it interms of added value, or wealth. Freddie Mercury wrote his own songs, which added value to our lives in this modern world, whereas some classical pianist basically plays mozart all day...now that may add value to someone's life, but if one pianist doesn't play mozart there will be another 20 who will. So Freddie Mercury created something new...he added value to people's lives. Now Freddie didn't need to know every complex terminology in music to do this...so it does show how pointless a lot of these things are. Getting back to my origional point which Alan Sugar made ( now u can disagree with him, but as a businessman he knows what he's talking about, remember he's wealthier than us so he must be doing something different) who stated that we need to teach kids enterprise and not textbook crap. If you can't accept the validity of that point you are stupid. Innovation drives this world. Everyone doesn't need a degree in XYZ to do this. The majority of degrees outside the science field are pathetic, and my whole point of Brian's thesis is that something that is so important could not wait 30years, but don't lose my point above.una999 wrote:Hi Been reading this thread with interest and would like to add the following. Let's have a look at the following dissertation topic - On the Gaussian error function which proved fundamental results on probability theory, namely the central limit theorem. Oh how this one drips off the tongue - I'm sure you agree the title is even easier to remember than Brian's topic. Well let's just take a moment to review this title and piece of research - this is the dissertation of a one Alan Turing (link the famous code breaker who helped change the direction of WWII due to his work at Bletchley Park. I can just hear your comments now on first review of the dissertation title - how irrelevant is this piece of work. I'm sure Alan Turing just shouldn't have bothered after all surely all of the real academic work in computing was researched and completed years before by better and smarter individuals i.e. Charles Babbage (link Using your point of view we'd never make any progress at all - You refer to Alan sugar time and time again - very successful and interesting guy but his success is mainly built on selling Amstrad PC's that other academic's and computing professionals invented and manufactured for him. Your posting is totally ironic - if we used your approach to education we'd all be still banging rocks together. "If something takes 30 years how can it really be relevant." Many academics take a lifetime of work and research only for their work to make an impact many years after their death. You'd not be able to post on this thread without the work of academics such as Turing and Babbage. I'm sure that Brian's research will have an equally important impact in the field of astronomy. Just because you don't grasp the relevance of the work doesn't make it irrelevant. And finally before you start stating that my example refers to computing which is engineering related and thus relevant from your limited perspective I'm sure I could find thousands of other examples in other fields i.e. music, art, etc etc... Learning and research is about making new discoveries not about how much money you can make. Academic research aids the whole of society and makes us what we are. Dismissing the work that Brian's done is a clear example of ignorance and a very limited outlook on life. I'd like to congratulate you on your original posting, it so clearly demonstrates to everyone a lot about yourself and your approach to everyone else - well done!gnomo wrote:But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. |
una999 06.08.2008 16:05 |
and i only used engineering and medicine as an example...i left out computers...well i'm sure i left out other important courses, but merely to show a point, don't have all day i come on here for a bit of fun |
thomasquinn 32989 06.08.2008 16:07 |
You are one mean thinking little man with a mind the size of a golf-ball. Really, you lack perspective. |
Hitman1965 06.08.2008 16:45 |
una999 wrote:Lots to consider in your reply - don't get me wrong; nothing wrong with Alan Sugar great guy and a big plus to society. You mention innovation - this comes from understanding and knowledge which comes from research. Please don't get me wrong - you can make great contributions to society without a degree -univerity of life is a great thing. Academic institutes are about providing an infrastructure to allow people to be creative and successful. You quote we need to teach kids enterprise not textbook crap - I'd comment that we need to teach kids to think, question and react constructively to what they encounter (objectivity comes to mind as well - which some people appear to lack). You comment that all members of Queen are self taught - if you really understood how academic institutes work you'd understand that all teachers really do is provide an infrastructure for people to learn. By the way correct me if I'm incorrect here but all four members of Queen all hold university degrees. There's really very little difference between a self taught subject and something structured as a university course.Hitman1965 wrote:I must confess i didn't read all that technical stuff...explain this then sir. Queen are pretty much self taught musicians, like most bands. So you could have a trained pianist but he'll never be as successful as freddie mercury...now u see that's if you measure success in terms of money, but i measure it interms of added value, or wealth. Freddie Mercury wrote his own songs, which added value to our lives in this modern world, whereas some classical pianist basically plays mozart all day...now that may add value to someone's life, but if one pianist doesn't play mozart there will be another 20 who will. So Freddie Mercury created something new...he added value to people's lives. Now Freddie didn't need to know every complex terminology in music to do this...so it does show how pointless a lot of these things are. Getting back to my origional point which Alan Sugar made ( now u can disagree with him, but as a businessman he knows what he's talking about, remember he's wealthier than us so he must be doing something different) who stated that we need to teach kids enterprise and not textbook crap. If you can't accept the validity of that point you are stupid. Innovation drives this world. Everyone doesn't need a degree in XYZ to do this. The majority of degrees outside the science field are pathetic, and my whole point of Brian's thesis is that something that is so important could not wait 30years, but don't lose my point above.una999 wrote:Hi Been reading this thread with interest and would like to add the following. Let's have a look at the following dissertation topic - On the Gaussian error function which proved fundamental results on probability theory, namely the central limit theorem. Oh how this one drips off the tongue - I'm sure you agree the title is even easier to remember than Brian's topic. Well let's just take a moment to review this title and piece of research - this is the dissertation of a one Alan Turing (link the famous code breaker who helped change the direction of WWII due to his work at Bletchley Park. I can just hear your comments now on first review of the dissertation title - how irrelevant is this piece of work. I'm sure Alan Turing just shouldn't have bothered after all surely all of the real academic work in computing was researched and completed years before by better and smarter individuals i.e. Charles Babbage (link Using your point of view we'd never make any progress at all - You refer to Alan sugar time and time again - very successful and interesting guy but his success is mainly built on selling Amstrad PC's that other academic's and computing professionals invented and manufactured for him. Your posting is totally ironic - if we used your approach to education we'd all be still banging rocks together. "If something takes 30 years how can it really be relevant." Many academics take a lifetime of work and research only for their work to make an impact many years after their death. You'd not be able to post on this thread without the work of academics such as Turing and Babbage. I'm sure that Brian's research will have an equally important impact in the field of astronomy. Just because you don't grasp the relevance of the work doesn't make it irrelevant. And finally before you start stating that my example refers to computing which is engineering related and thus relevant from your limited perspective I'm sure I could find thousands of other examples in other fields i.e. music, art, etc etc... Learning and research is about making new discoveries not about how much money you can make. Academic research aids the whole of society and makes us what we are. Dismissing the work that Brian's done is a clear example of ignorance and a very limited outlook on life. I'd like to congratulate you on your original posting, it so clearly demonstrates to everyone a lot about yourself and your approach to everyone else - well done!gnomo wrote:But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. I respect everyone's right to have an opinion (including yours) but please don't be so quick to term others stupid or pathetic. Please take some time to properly look at the area Brian studies before passing judgement. Your comment about if something is so important how can it wait 30 years. Scientific discovery and research can take a lifetime and in terms of Astronomical research 30 years is nothing in real terms. Publishing a Phd thesis and having it accepted is about reaching a certain level of research and having it acknowledged by your peers in the relevant field of study. It's about making a contribution to collective knowledge. That is what Brian's current piece of work is about - hard work and innovation aiming to help others understand. That should be recognised and applauded not dismissed as irrelevant. Brian's a fantastic role model for kids, hard working, skilled, loads of talent, highly creative in loads of areas both music and scientific. Commenting that you only come here to have fun - great I didn't start this debate - you did. Sounds like Brian completing his thesis appears to upset you - sorry to here this. |
Hitman1965 06.08.2008 16:53 |
typo at end - should read - sorry to HEAR this. |
john bodega 06.08.2008 21:50 |
Be careful; this thread might make it to 4 pages. una has always been a fucking tool.... I think I've lost more useful things down the drain to be honest. |
gnomo 07.08.2008 05:51 |
una999 wrote: my whole point of Brian's thesis is that something that is so important could not wait 30yearsAGAIN - you must have missed this explanation the first time around. Research on zodiacal dust was still relevant back then, when Brian started his work, as a means of understanding how our Solar System developed and works. However, it has been overlooked since, while research on the Solar System concentrated on planetary exploration through fly-by or surface probes, which brought more interesting and exciting data. BUT, since the search for extra-solar planetary system has progressed, thanks to better instruments, zodiacal dust has become of interest AGAIN, because dust clouds are considered the environment in which planets form and develop, so where plenty of dust is, it's likely that planets can be found. Astronomers today have instruments that can detect and "measure" dust clouds around other stars, while planets are still extremely difficult to detect: to find a planet, they need to now *where* to look and *what clues* to look for amongst the dust. Which means that a better knowledge of the structure and dynamics of those dust clouds has become relevant AGAIN for astronomers - this time, not those researching "our" planetary system, but those looking for other planetary systems "out there". In short, the topic of his thesis: - was important back then in a specific context; - lost importance subsequently; - has become important again in another context; does the above answer your question? |
kingogre 07.08.2008 07:00 |
Theres so many stupid things in your last post that I dont know where to begin. Im sure Alan Sugar is nice fellow, but maybe you should start having opinions of your own instead of just repeating what he says. So hes got more money than us, whats the point in this? Is all lifes about who makes the most money? The quote about all degrees outside of science being pathethic is both stupid and proves you dont know a thing about what goes on in a university or in research. How about you start giving arguments for your opinions instead of just saying "Alan Sugar says so" or "you have to agree otherwise you are stupid"? |
kingogre 07.08.2008 07:01 |
Luckily you seem to be the only one here who has opinions like these. |
john bodega 07.08.2008 07:47 |
I know Una is just an act, why do I keep getting sucked in then? |
thomasquinn 32989 07.08.2008 08:54 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Be careful; this thread might make it to 4 pages. una has always been a fucking tool.... I think I've lost more useful things down the drain to be honest.I'd go even further: Even Treasure Moment is more beneficial to this world than una. |
Hitman1965 07.08.2008 14:03 |
ThomasQuinn wrote:Question: I'm new here what is Treasure Moment?Zebonka12 wrote: Be careful; this thread might make it to 4 pages. una has always been a fucking tool.... I think I've lost more useful things down the drain to be honest.I'd go even further: Even Treasure Moment is more beneficial to this world than una. |
Adolfo and the spiders from Mercury 07.08.2008 14:18 |
una999 wrote: So i don't get this. Does this mean Brian is going to save the world..u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life? So fucking annoying, who cares it's bullshit. Can't believe universities waste money and resources (brian could have written a good song instead, the opportunity cost) on such shit. If this was so relevant to human civilisation wouldn't it have been completed by someone else 30 years ago...IF IT COULD WAIT 30 YEARS THAT SHOWS HOW IRRELEVANT IT ISTHIS! and you bitch about paople not liking you?? well fuck you! |
una999 07.08.2008 14:19 |
kingogre wrote: Theres so many stupid things in your last post that I dont know where to begin. Im sure Alan Sugar is nice fellow, but maybe you should start having opinions of your own instead of just repeating what he says. So hes got more money than us, whats the point in this? Is all lifes about who makes the most money? The quote about all degrees outside of science being pathethic is both stupid and proves you dont know a thing about what goes on in a university or in research. How about you start giving arguments for your opinions instead of just saying "Alan Sugar says so" or "you have to agree otherwise you are stupid"?Sorry haven't time to respond to everyone...i'll just pick this one. Ok so tell me that studying 13th century classical studies contributes to society? Not really, i mean calling a spade a spade. The brains of that individual could be put to productive use. BTW the only problem is that the TAXPAYER pays for it, if they want to do it themselves that's fine, but the universities that they use have been paid for with taxes, grants etc. I think i have given my own arguments and haven't just used alan sugar, i mean that's an immature response, you remind meof the civil service, just accept the message not the delivery boy, the fact of the matter is, that regardless of who says the message, it is true. |
una999 07.08.2008 14:22 |
Hitman1965 wrote:Ok i didn't mean to offend anyone, i'm just saying. no hard feelingsuna999 wrote:Lots to consider in your reply - don't get me wrong; nothing wrong with Alan Sugar great guy and a big plus to society. You mention innovation - this comes from understanding and knowledge which comes from research. Please don't get me wrong - you can make great contributions to society without a degree -univerity of life is a great thing. Academic institutes are about providing an infrastructure to allow people to be creative and successful. You quote we need to teach kids enterprise not textbook crap - I'd comment that we need to teach kids to think, question and react constructively to what they encounter (objectivity comes to mind as well - which some people appear to lack). You comment that all members of Queen are self taught - if you really understood how academic institutes work you'd understand that all teachers really do is provide an infrastructure for people to learn. By the way correct me if I'm incorrect here but all four members of Queen all hold university degrees. There's really very little difference between a self taught subject and something structured as a university course. I respect everyone's right to have an opinion (including yours) but please don't be so quick to term others stupid or pathetic. Please take some time to properly look at the area Brian studies before passing judgement. Your comment about if something is so important how can it wait 30 years. Scientific discovery and research can take a lifetime and in terms of Astronomical research 30 years is nothing in real terms. Publishing a Phd thesis and having it accepted is about reaching a certain level of research and having it acknowledged by your peers in the relevant field of study. It's about making a contribution to collective knowledge. That is what Brian's current piece of work is about - hard work and innovation aiming to help others understand. That should be recognised and applauded not dismissed as irrelevant. Brian's a fantastic role model for kids, hard working, skilled, loads of talent, highly creative in loads of areas both music and scientific. Commenting that you only come here to have fun - great I didn't start this debate - you did. Sounds like Brian completing his thesis appears to upset you - sorry to here this.Hitman1965 wrote:I must confess i didn't read all that technical stuff...explain this then sir. Queen are pretty much self taught musicians, like most bands. So you could have a trained pianist but he'll never be as successful as freddie mercury...now u see that's if you measure success in terms of money, but i measure it interms of added value, or wealth. Freddie Mercury wrote his own songs, which added value to our lives in this modern world, whereas some classical pianist basically plays mozart all day...now that may add value to someone's life, but if one pianist doesn't play mozart there will be another 20 who will. So Freddie Mercury created something new...he added value to people's lives. Now Freddie didn't need to know every complex terminology in music to do this...so it does show how pointless a lot of these things are. Getting back to my origional point which Alan Sugar made ( now u can disagree with him, but as a businessman he knows what he's talking about, remember he's wealthier than us so he must be doing something different) who stated that we need to teach kids enterprise and not textbook crap. If you can't accept the validity of that point you are stupid. Innovation drives this world. Everyone doesn't need a degree in XYZ to do this. The majority of degrees outside the science field are pathetic, and my whole point of Brian's thesis is that something that is so important could not wait 30years, but don't lose my point above.una999 wrote:Hi Been reading this thread with interest and would like to add the following. Let's have a look at the following dissertation topic - On the Gaussian error function which proved fundamental results on probability theory, namely the central limit theorem. Oh how this one drips off the tongue - I'm sure you agree the title is even easier to remember than Brian's topic. Well let's just take a moment to review this title and piece of research - this is the dissertation of a one Alan Turing (link the famous code breaker who helped change the direction of WWII due to his work at Bletchley Park. I can just hear your comments now on first review of the dissertation title - how irrelevant is this piece of work. I'm sure Alan Turing just shouldn't have bothered after all surely all of the real academic work in computing was researched and completed years before by better and smarter individuals i.e. Charles Babbage (link Using your point of view we'd never make any progress at all - You refer to Alan sugar time and time again - very successful and interesting guy but his success is mainly built on selling Amstrad PC's that other academic's and computing professionals invented and manufactured for him. Your posting is totally ironic - if we used your approach to education we'd all be still banging rocks together. "If something takes 30 years how can it really be relevant." Many academics take a lifetime of work and research only for their work to make an impact many years after their death. You'd not be able to post on this thread without the work of academics such as Turing and Babbage. I'm sure that Brian's research will have an equally important impact in the field of astronomy. Just because you don't grasp the relevance of the work doesn't make it irrelevant. And finally before you start stating that my example refers to computing which is engineering related and thus relevant from your limited perspective I'm sure I could find thousands of other examples in other fields i.e. music, art, etc etc... Learning and research is about making new discoveries not about how much money you can make. Academic research aids the whole of society and makes us what we are. Dismissing the work that Brian's done is a clear example of ignorance and a very limited outlook on life. I'd like to congratulate you on your original posting, it so clearly demonstrates to everyone a lot about yourself and your approach to everyone else - well done!gnomo wrote:But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. |
john bodega 07.08.2008 14:39 |
Hitman1965 wrote: Question: I'm new here what is Treasure Moment?Hi. They're a band that post on Queenzone frequently. It's either Max or Amir, and Andreas that are the guys that come the most. Andreas is apparently fake, but he sounds genuine to me :/ More to the point; they are a crappy Swedish Myspace band disaster, but according to their members they are 'the 2nd greatest band in history'. And also 'following in Queen's footsteps'. :/ |
Hitman1965 07.08.2008 16:41 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Thanks for the heads up - sounds entertaining and I don't mean the music - will have to google it for a laugh by the sounds of your comments. Any idea if they model themselves after Abba?Hitman1965 wrote: Question: I'm new here what is Treasure Moment?Hi. They're a band that post on Queenzone frequently. It's either Max or Amir, and Andreas that are the guys that come the most. Andreas is apparently fake, but he sounds genuine to me :/ More to the point; they are a crappy Swedish Myspace band disaster, but according to their members they are 'the 2nd greatest band in history'. And also 'following in Queen's footsteps'. :/ |
Hitman1965 07.08.2008 16:42 |
una999 wrote:Thank you.Hitman1965 wrote:Ok i didn't mean to offend anyone, i'm just saying. no hard feelingsuna999 wrote:Lots to consider in your reply - don't get me wrong; nothing wrong with Alan Sugar great guy and a big plus to society. You mention innovation - this comes from understanding and knowledge which comes from research. Please don't get me wrong - you can make great contributions to society without a degree -univerity of life is a great thing. Academic institutes are about providing an infrastructure to allow people to be creative and successful. You quote we need to teach kids enterprise not textbook crap - I'd comment that we need to teach kids to think, question and react constructively to what they encounter (objectivity comes to mind as well - which some people appear to lack). You comment that all members of Queen are self taught - if you really understood how academic institutes work you'd understand that all teachers really do is provide an infrastructure for people to learn. By the way correct me if I'm incorrect here but all four members of Queen all hold university degrees. There's really very little difference between a self taught subject and something structured as a university course. I respect everyone's right to have an opinion (including yours) but please don't be so quick to term others stupid or pathetic. Please take some time to properly look at the area Brian studies before passing judgement. Your comment about if something is so important how can it wait 30 years. Scientific discovery and research can take a lifetime and in terms of Astronomical research 30 years is nothing in real terms. Publishing a Phd thesis and having it accepted is about reaching a certain level of research and having it acknowledged by your peers in the relevant field of study. It's about making a contribution to collective knowledge. That is what Brian's current piece of work is about - hard work and innovation aiming to help others understand. That should be recognised and applauded not dismissed as irrelevant. Brian's a fantastic role model for kids, hard working, skilled, loads of talent, highly creative in loads of areas both music and scientific. Commenting that you only come here to have fun - great I didn't start this debate - you did. Sounds like Brian completing his thesis appears to upset you - sorry to here this.Hitman1965 wrote:I must confess i didn't read all that technical stuff...explain this then sir. Queen are pretty much self taught musicians, like most bands. So you could have a trained pianist but he'll never be as successful as freddie mercury...now u see that's if you measure success in terms of money, but i measure it interms of added value, or wealth. Freddie Mercury wrote his own songs, which added value to our lives in this modern world, whereas some classical pianist basically plays mozart all day...now that may add value to someone's life, but if one pianist doesn't play mozart there will be another 20 who will. So Freddie Mercury created something new...he added value to people's lives. Now Freddie didn't need to know every complex terminology in music to do this...so it does show how pointless a lot of these things are. Getting back to my origional point which Alan Sugar made ( now u can disagree with him, but as a businessman he knows what he's talking about, remember he's wealthier than us so he must be doing something different) who stated that we need to teach kids enterprise and not textbook crap. If you can't accept the validity of that point you are stupid. Innovation drives this world. Everyone doesn't need a degree in XYZ to do this. The majority of degrees outside the science field are pathetic, and my whole point of Brian's thesis is that something that is so important could not wait 30years, but don't lose my point above.una999 wrote:Hi Been reading this thread with interest and would like to add the following. Let's have a look at the following dissertation topic - On the Gaussian error function which proved fundamental results on probability theory, namely the central limit theorem. Oh how this one drips off the tongue - I'm sure you agree the title is even easier to remember than Brian's topic. Well let's just take a moment to review this title and piece of research - this is the dissertation of a one Alan Turing (link the famous code breaker who helped change the direction of WWII due to his work at Bletchley Park. I can just hear your comments now on first review of the dissertation title - how irrelevant is this piece of work. I'm sure Alan Turing just shouldn't have bothered after all surely all of the real academic work in computing was researched and completed years before by better and smarter individuals i.e. Charles Babbage (link Using your point of view we'd never make any progress at all - You refer to Alan sugar time and time again - very successful and interesting guy but his success is mainly built on selling Amstrad PC's that other academic's and computing professionals invented and manufactured for him. Your posting is totally ironic - if we used your approach to education we'd all be still banging rocks together. "If something takes 30 years how can it really be relevant." Many academics take a lifetime of work and research only for their work to make an impact many years after their death. You'd not be able to post on this thread without the work of academics such as Turing and Babbage. I'm sure that Brian's research will have an equally important impact in the field of astronomy. Just because you don't grasp the relevance of the work doesn't make it irrelevant. And finally before you start stating that my example refers to computing which is engineering related and thus relevant from your limited perspective I'm sure I could find thousands of other examples in other fields i.e. music, art, etc etc... Learning and research is about making new discoveries not about how much money you can make. Academic research aids the whole of society and makes us what we are. Dismissing the work that Brian's done is a clear example of ignorance and a very limited outlook on life. I'd like to congratulate you on your original posting, it so clearly demonstrates to everyone a lot about yourself and your approach to everyone else - well done!gnomo wrote:But if it could wait 30 years...how relevant is it?una999 wrote: u see what difference is this PHD going to make to anyone's life?A whole world of difference to HIS life surely. Some difference, hopefully, also to the life of some astronomer who might use the data and conclusions in it to get a better understanding of something somewhere in the Universe. |
kingogre 08.08.2008 02:21 |
una999 wrote:kingogre wrote: Theres so many stupid things in your last post that I dont know where to begin. Im sure Alan Sugar is nice fellow, but maybe you should start having opinions of your own instead of just repeating what he says. So hes got more money than us, whats the point in this? Is all lifes about who makes the most money? The quote about all degrees outside of science being pathethic is both stupid and proves you dont know a thing about what goes on in a university or in research. How about you start giving arguments for your opinions instead of just saying "Alan Sugar says so" or "you have to agree otherwise you are stupid"?Sorry haven't time to respond to everyone...i'll just pick this one. Ok so tell me that studying 13th century classical studies contributes to society? Not really, i mean calling a spade a spade. The brains of that individual could be put to productive use. BTW the only problem is that the TAXPAYER pays for it, if they want to do it themselves that's fine, but the universities that they use have been paid for with taxes, grants etc. |
john bodega 08.08.2008 02:45 |
Hitman1965 wrote: Thanks for the heads up - sounds entertaining and I don't mean the music - will have to google it for a laugh by the sounds of your comments. Any idea if they model themselves after Abba?It would be a serious improvement if they did. |
una999 09.08.2008 08:09 |
kingogre wrote:una999 wrote:I'm going to finish up here on this one...to understand out modern society...no one understands modern society, and it is more influenced by new superpowers like china and russia. i love history, but on that note, if you watch discovery channel, you'd think WW2 was the only war in history!!! I'm a member of my local historical society!!!kingogre wrote: Theres so many stupid things in your last post that I dont know where to begin. Im sure Alan Sugar is nice fellow, but maybe you should start having opinions of your own instead of just repeating what he says. So hes got more money than us, whats the point in this? Is all lifes about who makes the most money? The quote about all degrees outside of science being pathethic is both stupid and proves you dont know a thing about what goes on in a university or in research. How about you start giving arguments for your opinions instead of just saying "Alan Sugar says so" or "you have to agree otherwise you are stupid"?Sorry haven't time to respond to everyone...i'll just pick this one. Ok so tell me that studying 13th century classical studies contributes to society? Not really, i mean calling a spade a spade. The brains of that individual could be put to productive use. BTW the only problem is that the TAXPAYER pays for it, if they want to do it themselves that's fine, but the universities that they use have been paid for with taxes, grants etc. I think i have given my own arguments and haven't just used alan sugar, i mean that's an immature response, you remind meof the civil service, just accept the message not the delivery boy, the fact of the matter is, that regardless of who says the message, it is true. [/QUOTe] 13th century classics are to a large part the foundation of our literature today, have formed the thinking of the people who have read them since, are still read today and are vital and rare examples of how the culture and society of the 13th century. They can also be studied both from a historical perspective and to understand how our modern society and values have developed and why they are the way they are. Surely you do not think that history is useless subject? My apologies for being harsh, got carried away.:) |