| Queen Archivist 30.07.2008 11:19 |
Dear lovely Queenzoners, whom I've occassionally referred to as Moanzoners, in a quite amusing and refreshing fashion... DIM PERKS has taken exception to me expressing my own opinion, and says I would be sacked immediately if I worked for him. He wants to know if QPL are aware I say such things... as if everything I say is exactly THEIR views too, which of course is a million miles from the fact, again. This Dickenzian... indeed Jurassic... attitude has provoked me to respond with the following, to him, in that thread. But I think it bears repeating in this, it's own thread.... so incredulous am I that people like that STILL exist, and are apparently proud to publicly air such out-dated and frankly worrying attitudes. See what you think of this........ I originally wrote.... "GO FUCK YOURSELF Dim Perks. Is that readable enough for you!! Because DIM PERKS said I was unable to make myself clear. i thought THAT was clear enough, don't you!?!? DIM PINKY PERKY FAN REPLIED... Truly unbelievable... Greg, don't let yourself so intimidated by a bunch of people on the internet. Does Queen know you are expressing yourself like this to people that keep the legend of Queen alive? That are faithful? I think it is a shame, if you were my employee I'd fire you immedeately. I THEN WENT ON.... DEAREST DIM PERKS. IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTIONS... WHICH HAVE IN FACT ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED MANY MANY TIMES OVER THE YEARS... SNOOZE SNOOZE, FIGHT TO KEEP MY EYES OPEN... YES, QPL ARE AWARE I AM EXPRESSING MYSELF THE WAY I AM. BECAUSE, LIKE YOU, THEY HAVE ACCESS TO THE INTERNET AND CAN READ TOO. VERY WELL IN FACT... EVEN JOINED UP LETTERS AND LONG WORDS. THEY'RE VERY CAPABLE OF SEEING MY 'CONTRIBUTIONS' HERE. JUST LIKE YOU ARE. YES YES YES. AND... JUST IN CASE... CRETINS LIKE YOU ARE FOREVER WRITING TO SAY... "HEY QUEEN, GUESS WHAT THAT NASTY GREG BROOKS SAID ON MOANZONE... AND HE USED BAD LANGUAGE IN YOUR NAME TOO, SO EVERYONE WILL THINK THAT HIS OPINIONS MUST BE REPRESENTATIVE OF QUEEN'S TOO. BECAUSE WE AT QUEENZONE SEEM TO ASSUME THAT EVERYTHING GB SAYS ARE VIEWS HELD BY QUEEN AS WELL." NO. YOU FOOLISH CHAP. GREG BROOKS' OPINIONS, VIEWS, EXPRESSIONS, ARE HIS AND HIS ALONE. THEY DO NOT EXPRESS THE OPINION OF QUEEN OR ITS MEMBERS OR MANAGEMENT. NO MORE THAN STEVE WRIGHT OR TERRY WOGAN'S VIEWS MIRROR THOSE OF BBC RADIO 2. ONLY A DICKHEAD WOULD THINK OTHERWISE. THEY CAN FIND MY WORDS OF EXPRESSION AT ANY POINT, JUST LIKE YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE CAN. I THOUGHT THAT SHOULD BE VERY BLATANTLY OBVIOUS, PAL. APPARENTLY NOT. THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR?? NOW THEN, YOU DIM PERKY PERSON, WHEN YOU SAY.... "people that keep the legend of Queen alive" REMEMBER THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE ON QZ ARE NOT AT ALL MAJOR QUEEN FANS, AS IS CLEARLY EVIDENT. THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE ON THIS SITE - IT'S NO SECRET AT ALL - THAT CLEARLY HAVE LITTLE AFFECTION FOR QUEEN OR SOME (OR MOST) OF THE RELATED PRODUCT. SO, YOUR BLANKET GENERALISATION IS WAY OFF THE MARK. "people that keep the legend of Queen alive"... INDEED!!! YOU DO MAKE ME LAUGH. YEAH RIGHT!!!! AS IF. "That are faithful." HAVE A WORD WITH YOUR SILLY SELF. YOU'RE LIVING IN A UTOPIAN-TYPE DREAM WORLD. YOU SHOULD READ WHAT SOME QZ-ERS SAY ABOUT FREDDIE AND BRIAN AND QUEEN ON THIS SITE. MUCH OF IT IS OUTRIGHT OFFENSIVE AND LIBELOUS. PLEASE DON'T TELL ME YOU'VE NOT NOTICED THIS BEFORE. SOME OF THE VILE THINGS I'VE SEEN ON HERE ABOUT FREDDIE AND HIS PAST, HIS LOVERS, HIS PRIVATE LIFE, HAVE BEEN AN ABOMINATION... REALLY NASTY HORRIBLE STUFF, THAT EVEN UPSET CERTAIN QZ-ERS. SO GET IT INTO PERSPECTIVE FOR GOODNESS SAKE. MY RESPONSE OF 'GO FUCK YOURSELF', TO AN IDIOT WHO OBSERVED THAT I COULDN'T OR WASN'T MAKING MYSELF CLEAR, WAS REASONABLE IT SEEMS TO ME, AND IT FURTHER PALES INTO NOTHINGNESS IN COMPARISON WITH MANY OF THE NASTY FREDDIE COMMENTS WE'VE ALL BEEN APPALLED TO READ HERE IN THE PAST (AND PROBABLY CURRENTLY TOO). SO DO PLEASE KEEP IT IN BALANCE PERKY. THAT'S A FAIR COMMENT AIN'T IT NOT. THAT'S BAD GRAMMAR I KNOW, BUT NOT WORTHY OF A NOTE FROM YOU TO JIM BEACH I THINK. WHAT PLANET ARE YOU ON??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!! I think it is a shame... LISTEN DIM PINKY & PERKY FAN... QPL REALISE THAT I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR MY OWN WORDS AND EXPRESSIONS. UNLIKE YOU, THEY LIVE IN THE REAL WORLD. THIS IS STILL, JUST ABOUT, A FREE COUNTRY WHERE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION STILL PROSPERS. SO I CAN CALL YOU AN ANNOYING PROVOCATIVE TURD IF I LIKE, AND NOT BE IN FEAR OF GETTING THE SACK LIKE I WOULD IF, APPARENTLY, I DARED TO SPEAK MY MIND OPENLY IF I WORKED FOR YOU. THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE YOU, SIR, IN ZIMBABWE RIGHT NOW, THAT ACTIVELY SEEK TO SILENCE PEOPLE, STOP THEM EXPRESSING THEIR FREE THOUGHTS. STOP THEM HAVING THEIR SAY, THEIR VOTE. "if you were my employee I'd fire you immedeately" I DON'T DOUBT IT, YOU SMALL MINDED MORON. YOU'VE SPELT IMMEDIATELY WRONG BY THE WAY. IF YOU WERE MY EMPLOYEE AND YOU SPELLED SOMETHING WRONG, OR EXPRESSED AN OPINION I DIDN'T AGREE WITH... I WOULD NOT SACK YOU 'IMMEDEATELY' OR IMMEDIATELY, OR ANYTHING ELSE. I'D RECOGNISE THAT YOU SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO SPEAK YOUR MIND WITHOUT FEAR OF LOSING YOUR JOB. I FEEL SORRY FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU... AND MORE SO FOR THE POOR PEOPLE THAT WORK FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU, WHO HAVE TO CONSTANTLY TREAD ON EGGSHELLS LEST THEY SHOULD DISAGGREE WITH YOU AND BE SACKED. THEY CANNOT FINANCIALLY AFFORD TO EXPRESS THEIR TRUE FEELINGS, BECAUSE FOOLS LIKE YOU COME DOWN HARD ON ANYTHING THAT COUNTERS YOUR OWN INFLEXIBLE OPINION. SMALL-MINDED IS JUST THE TIP OF THAT NASTY ICEBERG. |
| Queen Archivist 30.07.2008 11:35 |
Hey People. Further to the above...There is a person right now on Queenzone, calling his sorry (faceless, ananymous, cowardly) self, Fatty... whom has SIXTEEN HUNDRED 'posts' on this Queen so called FAN site... who writes the following. I will zone in on just some of it for you... FATTY OBSERVES... "In that respect I wonder if Freddie was a poof. I was just wondering if Freddie ever knelt down beside an armchair and allowed the sitee to rest their legs on his back. Or was Freddie a faggot. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie had ever been chopped up, mixed with onions and meal and served in a rich gravy. And does anyone know if Freddie dropped anchor in Poo Bay. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie ever served in her majesty's navy and was given shore leave when they docked at an amusingly named port. And I can't help but wonder if Freddie ever sucked another man's cock..." YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN IN THE ABOVE THREAD.... Perky and his like-minded imbeciles are so worried about QPL possibly not being aware that Greg Brooks swears a bit here and there and calls folk bad things (BIG DEAL), and some people might think that Brian, Rog and anyone else must thing exactly the same, that he misses the REALLY nasty horrible bastards like Fatty, with his homophobic and puerile approach to a person he knows nothing about. PERKY, dear boy... Don't hone in on me and my insignificant words or use of the word FUCK (BIG DEAL again) while there are turds like Fatty out there, that need to be put out of their, and our, misery. Think about it you silly sausage. |
| PieterMC 30.07.2008 11:37 |
Perhaps you should start QueenArchivistSoapbox.com instead of ranting and raving on here. BTW. Fatty is not exactly faceless. His real name is well known due to the fact that he has written a few books. |
| john bodega 30.07.2008 11:41 |
What a sorry fucking cry-baby. It's not that you're wrong, Greg Brooks. Actually you're quite right. However, since you've noticed this place is quite the cesspit; why are you still here? You're not interested in the opinion of the average Queen fan and even if you were, you wouldn't be in a position to do anything with such information. You're not here to socialise with anybody. Anybody you do official business with on this site will surely have your e-mail. Why the fuck are you still here, man? I thought you hated the place! |
| Pim Derks 30.07.2008 11:52 |
Greg, just the fact that you cannot even correctly quote a person AND use the correct name says móre than enough. The things you say that I said to you were in fact said by sunshine_123456 or whatever his names was. BUT WHAT DO YOU CARE, IF YOU DON'T EVEN CARE TO MAKE A SINGLE READABLE POST. |
| Micrówave 30.07.2008 12:29 |
Greg, if you can waste sooooooo much time writing a re-run episode of a Queenzone event that happened a week ago, can I make a suggestion? How about answering a simple question every once in a while. And not some meaningless, ambiguous bull shit, but a honest answer. We understand there is A LOT that Queen doesn't want us to know. Fair Enough. But you never come out and say that, instead you cover up, create, fictionalize, even manufacture a bogus Archive list. It would be nice to hear something like "QPL is still deciding on whether to release _____ or not due to the fact that the _______ _______ from that show are _______ and a viable source of ________ is immenent." I think you would get a lot more respect from us "Moanzoners", because at first I'll be honest. It was pretty cool to have dialogue with Queen's Archivist. While it may have not been the Encyclopedia of Queen, what we were getting from you felt a little more special than something you get from a message board. But then something happened. All your JSS memories started coming out, the vulgar language, even cross words with trolls. Please Greg, come back. I know the real Greg Brooks is in there and can hear me. Fight this dark side, we're with you all the way. |
| masterstroke_84 30.07.2008 12:51 |
One more proof that the Queen Productions team is a disaster, one of his members discussing in a fan-site... oh God... C'mon, grow up and go to work... now. |
| The Fairy King 30.07.2008 13:08 |
Omg you're funny as hell. What does it feel like to have the IQ of a peanut? |
| Raf 30.07.2008 13:46 |
Greg... link Have some fun over there and come back to the Forum when you actually have something that we all would like to read. Such as news about the Box Set. |
| -fatty- 2850 30.07.2008 13:54 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Hey People. Further to the above...There is a person right now on Queenzone, calling his sorry (faceless, ananymous, cowardly) self, Fatty... whom has SIXTEEN HUNDRED 'posts' on this Queen so called FAN site... who writes the following. I will zone in on just some of it for you... FATTY OBSERVES... "In that respect I wonder if Freddie was a poof. I was just wondering if Freddie ever knelt down beside an armchair and allowed the sitee to rest their legs on his back. Or was Freddie a faggot. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie had ever been chopped up, mixed with onions and meal and served in a rich gravy. And does anyone know if Freddie dropped anchor in Poo Bay. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie ever served in her majesty's navy and was given shore leave when they docked at an amusingly named port. And I can't help but wonder if Freddie ever sucked another man's cock..." YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN IN THE ABOVE THREAD.... Perky and his like-minded imbeciles are so worried about QPL possibly not being aware that Greg Brooks swears a bit here and there and calls folk bad things (BIG DEAL), and some people might think that Brian, Rog and anyone else must thing exactly the same, that he misses the REALLY nasty horrible bastards like Fatty, with his homophobic and puerile approach to a person he knows nothing about. PERKY, dear boy... Don't hone in on me and my insignificant words or use of the word FUCK (BIG DEAL again) while there are turds like Fatty out there, that need to be put out of their, and our, misery. Think about it you silly sausage.Dear Mr Archivist I was sorry to hear that a post of mine had offended you to the point that you felt the need to drag me into an argument that had absolutely fuck all to do with me in the first place. First of all I'd like to point out that the post that caused so much offence in the first place was intended as a joke. A thread entitled "Was Freddie Gay?" appears on average about twice a week on Queenzone and my post was at best, nothing more than a poor excuse for satire. So let me take this opportunity to assure you that I am not a homophobe. In fact it may sound slightly cliche, but one of my best friends is gay....probably. I hope you will appreciate the fact that I have not as yet felt the need to call you names and if you will permit me, I'd like to instead defend myself from the tirade of insults you have thrown in my direction. In one sentence you referred to me as faceless, ananymous (which you spelled wrong)and cowardly. I think it's a bit unfair to call me faceless when there's a black and white picture of my fat fucking face right next to the offending post. As for the anonymity issue I'd like to refer you to your own username. I'm pretty sure that your real name is Greg Brooks, not Queen Archivist. My real name is Scott Simpson and most of the folks I chat with on a semi regular basis at Queenzone are well aware of that. And to call me cowardly would have to suggest that there is something or someone to fear in the first place. Unless of course you are planning on paying me a visit yourself to put me out of my misery with a kung fu chop. Well I hope that's cleared things up between us and that in future when you're having a bit of a tiff with someone on Queenzone, you wont feel the need to involve other people in your petty arguments. Your good pal fatty |
| Wiley 30.07.2008 14:17 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Hey People. Further to the above...There is a person right now on Queenzone, calling his sorry (faceless, ananymous, cowardly) self, Fatty... whom has SIXTEEN HUNDRED 'posts' on this Queen so called FAN site... who writes the following.Fatty's posts are usually very funny and intelligently written and I don't remember him attacking anyone in this forum. No need to judge a person or call names when you don't know them and they haven't attacked you in any way. If you didn't get the joke then that is your problem. Not everybody in these forums is a faceless, coward person with no life. I have about 600 posts, am I a bad person also? In the old forum it was possible to know when every user had joined. If you could see that, you would know that some people made over 1000 posts in 2 months (spammers) and some in 7 years (regular non-obsessive posters). On another non related issue, Greg, how has your Queen related job been lately? Anything exciting over there that you might want to share? Regards, Juan Carlos Wiley (an actual person with a face) from Monterrey, Mexico |
| YourValentine 30.07.2008 15:14 |
Check the new profiles, Jacey - you can look up the QZ stats of a user. There are many new features like avatars, private messages and picture gallery. The old forum is offline but Richard implements the features it had into the current forum and even more. The only feature missing now is an equivalent search function. |
| Erin 30.07.2008 16:18 |
fatty wrote: And to call me cowardly would have to suggest that there is something or someone to fear in the first place. Unless of course you are planning on paying me a visit yourself to put me out of my misery with a kung fu chop.Ha! ;-D |
| PieterMC 30.07.2008 16:32 |
Erin wrote:With karate He'll kick your assfatty wrote: And to call me cowardly would have to suggest that there is something or someone to fear in the first place. Unless of course you are planning on paying me a visit yourself to put me out of my misery with a kung fu chop.Ha! ;-D From here to Tiennamen Square. Oh yeah, muthafucka, He's 'gonna kick your fuckin' derriere. You broke the rules, Now He'll pull out all your pubic hair, You muthafucka. You muthafucka. |
| Micrówave 30.07.2008 18:27 |
fatty wrote: put me out of my misery with a kung fu chop.Shotokan chops are much deeper and leave bigger bruises. |
| brENsKi 30.07.2008 18:30 |
the "2 greatest band of alltime" is fast becoming a laughing stock...because they appear to employ tossers who have little regard for anything other than wanking off their own egos on this site... you don;t get GB's quality of shite on forums of other decent bands....no wonder that queen have little international music-biz credibilty with morons like GB in charge of the crown jewels...i wouldn;t trust the tw*t with a bag of fucking conkers!!!! |
| StoneColdClassicQueen 30.07.2008 19:07 |
I haven't the slightest idea what this post is about. |
| Donna13 30.07.2008 21:25 |
This thread is a self-imposed intervention. Greg has realized that Queenzone is very bad for his health. The stress has recently caused him to use the "f word" in the Serious forum, quote and get mad at the wrong person, use the word "pal", misunderstand a brilliant humorous post by fatty, and also to eat a really bad (probably with fake ingredients) custard tart while stealing his neighbor's wireless internet connection. The problem is that whenever he comes here he is attacked by a mob of people who really just want to get to Brian and Roger and/or get their hands on the contents of the archives. |
| steven 35638 30.07.2008 23:16 |
How can Queen's very own archivist, who is supposed to honorably represent the band, be such an annoying jerk on a Queen fan site? This thread, in particular, is very incoherent. This brings me to my skepticism. Is this truly the real and definitive Greg Brooks? Or is it possible, just possible, that this is just a fake trying to get everybody excited? I strongly encourage everybody to take a step back for a moment and analyze this very carefully. If anyone can offer any form of evidence to prove that he is the real deal, please do! Until then, I'm not convinced. I haven't been for the longest time. |
| Matias Merçeauroix 31.07.2008 03:36 |
Mr. Greg Brooks, you are well invited to my birthday party. Cheers, Hor |
| Poo, again 31.07.2008 06:05 |
ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZzzzzzZZZZZzzZZZzzzzz |
| cmsdrums 31.07.2008 07:12 |
brENsKi wrote: ...i wouldn;t trust the tw*t with a bag of fucking conkers!!!!LOL!! :-) |
| Bad Seed 31.07.2008 08:00 |
Queen Archivist wrote: THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's. |
| thomasquinn 32989 31.07.2008 10:22 |
Queen Archivist wrote: Hey People. Further to the above...There is a person right now on Queenzone, calling his sorry (faceless, ananymous, cowardly) self, Fatty... whom has SIXTEEN HUNDRED 'posts' on this Queen so called FAN site... who writes the following. I will zone in on just some of it for you... FATTY OBSERVES... "In that respect I wonder if Freddie was a poof. I was just wondering if Freddie ever knelt down beside an armchair and allowed the sitee to rest their legs on his back. Or was Freddie a faggot. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie had ever been chopped up, mixed with onions and meal and served in a rich gravy. And does anyone know if Freddie dropped anchor in Poo Bay. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie ever served in her majesty's navy and was given shore leave when they docked at an amusingly named port. And I can't help but wonder if Freddie ever sucked another man's cock..." YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN IN THE ABOVE THREAD.... Perky and his like-minded imbeciles are so worried about QPL possibly not being aware that Greg Brooks swears a bit here and there and calls folk bad things (BIG DEAL), and some people might think that Brian, Rog and anyone else must thing exactly the same, that he misses the REALLY nasty horrible bastards like Fatty, with his homophobic and puerile approach to a person he knows nothing about. PERKY, dear boy... Don't hone in on me and my insignificant words or use of the word FUCK (BIG DEAL again) while there are turds like Fatty out there, that need to be put out of their, and our, misery. Think about it you silly sausage.You seem to be forgetting just one thing: fatty is a comedian. And a damn good one! |
| Rick 31.07.2008 12:32 |
Pim, you're now officially PROPERTY OF QUEEN PRODUCTIONS. Congrats! ;-) |
| Pim Derks 31.07.2008 12:49 |
If that means I can sit on my ass all days eating custard tarts, while listening to the demo of White Queen sung by Brian in 1969 with no deadline to work for - I'm all for it. |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:10 |
Dear Mr Archivist I was sorry to hear that a post of mine had offended you to the point that you felt the need to drag me into an argument that had absolutely fuck all to do with me in the first place. GB: FATTY, I WAS NOT REMOTELY OFFENDED. THAT'S THE FIRST THING TO SAY. I MERELY POINTED OUT THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOU DO EXIST, AND DO SAY NASTY THINGS... AND YOU DO. YOU AND YOUR WORDS COMPLETELY ENDORSED THE EXACT POINT I WAS MAKING IT IS YOUR ASSUMPTION THAT I AM OFFENDED. I HONESTLY AM NOT. YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION AND SENSE OF HUMOUR. I PERSONALLY THINK IT'S JUST A VERY STRANGE THING TO SEE ON A SITE THAT'S SUPPOSEDLY (MOST PEOPLE WOULD REASONABLY IMAGINE) INTENDED TO ENCOMPASS REAL QUEEN FANS. YOUR PUERILE AND HOMOPHOBIC ATTEMPT AT A JOKE, TO MY MIND, HAS NO PLACE ON A SITE LIKE THIS, OR ANYWHERE... WHERE FOR EXAMPLE A YOUNGSTER MIGHT FIND SUCH THINGS AS YOU TALKING ABOUT FREDDIE, AND COCK, FAGGOT, POOF, AND POO BAY, AND ALL THOSE OTHER HORRIBLE THINGS. I'M NOT OFFENDED, CHUM, JUST A BIT DISAPPOINTED. YOU ARE A QUEEN FAN????? IF SO, HOW YOU CAN YOU WRITE THAT SHIT? First of all I'd like to point out that the post that caused so much offence in the first place was intended as a joke. I'M NOT OFFENDED. AND I REALISED IT WAS A JOKE. BUT CAN'T YOU SEE THAT IT WAS REALLY RATHER NASTY AND REPULSIVE? OR DO YOU NEED OTHERS TO POINT THAT OUT FOR YOU? A thread entitled "Was Freddie Gay?" appears on average about twice a week on Queenzone and my post was at best, nothing more than a poor excuse for satire. WHAT A COMPLETELY LUDICROUS THING TO SAY. AS IF THAT MAKES YOUR WORDS OK. SILLY PERSON. So let me take this opportunity to assure you that I am not a homophobe. In fact it may sound slightly cliche, but one of my best friends is gay....probably. I BET HE/SHE REALLY ENJOYED YOUR DISCUSTING AND BELITTLING AND DEGRADING 'VIEW' VOCABULARY. I'M BETTING YOU ARE A TEENAGER. YOU WILL ONE DAY REALISE HOW DEGRADING AND UNNECESSARY YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS WAS FOR YOUR... 'JOKE'. I hope you will appreciate the fact that I have not as yet felt the need to call you names and if you will permit me, I'd like to instead defend myself from the tirade of insults you have thrown in my direction. In one sentence you referred to me as faceless, ananymous (which you spelled wrong)and cowardly. I think it's a bit unfair to call me faceless when there's a black and white picture of my fat fucking face right next to the offending post. LIKE ANYONE IS SUPPOSED TO KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT'S YOU!!!!!!!!!! As for the anonymity issue I'd like to refer you to your own username. I'm pretty sure that your real name is Greg Brooks, not Queen Archivist. STUPID THING TO SAY. EVERYONE KNOWS VERY WELL WHO I AM ON THIS SITE. 'FATTY' MEANS NOTHING TO ME. ANYWAY, THAT WASN'T THE REAL POINT. IT WASN'T THE IMPORTANT THING I FOCUSSED ON. My real name is Scott Simpson and most of the folks I chat with on a semi regular basis at Queenzone are well aware of that. And to call me cowardly would have to suggest that there is something or someone to fear in the first place. Unless of course you are planning on paying me a visit yourself to put me out of my misery with a kung fu chop. OK, NOT A COWARD THEN, SCOTT. BUT YOU STILL COME ACROSS AS HOMOPHOBIC WITH YOUR NASTY LITTLE JOKE THAT WASN'Y A JOKE - JUST AN ILLUSTRATION OF HOW YOUR MIND WORKS. Well I hope that's cleared things up between us and that in future when you're having a bit of a tiff with someone on Queenzone, you wont feel the need to involve other people in your petty arguments. NO, I STILL THINK I'D RATHER AVOID YOU... HAVING HEARD A LITTLE OF HOW YOUR MIND TICKS... LET'S REMIND EVERYONE OF HOW 'NOT' HONOPHOBIC YOU ARE (OR MIGHT BE PERCEIVED) WITH YOUR REALLY FUNNY JOKE... "In that respect I wonder if Freddie was a poof. Or was Freddie a faggot. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie had ever been chopped up, mixed with onions and meal and served in a rich gravy. And does anyone know if Freddie dropped anchor in Poo Bay. I'm not talking about his sexuality of course. I was just wondering if Freddie ever served in her majesty's navy and was given shore leave when they docked at an amusingly named port. And I can't help but wonder if Freddie ever sucked another man's cock..." SCOTT... ASK YOUR PROBABLY GAY FRIEND HOW FUNNY AND SENSITIVE AND MATURE HE/SHE THINKS YOUR JOKE IS. Your good pal fatty |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:14 |
WILEY WROTE.... Fatty's posts are usually very funny and intelligently written and I don't remember him attacking anyone in this forum. No need to judge a person or call names when you don't know them and they haven't attacked you in any way. If you didn't get the joke then that is your problem.
Not everybody in these forums is a faceless, coward person with no life. I have about 600 posts, am I a bad person also?
In the old forum it was possible to know when every user had joined. If you could see that, you would know that some people made over 1000 posts in 2 months (spammers) and some in 7 years (regular non-obsessive posters).
On another non related issue, Greg, how has your Queen related job been lately? Anything exciting over there that you might want to share?
Regards,
Juan Carlos Wiley (an actual person with a face)
from Monterrey, Mexico
QUEEN ARCHIVIST REPLIES.... Wiley... you did not say much about what you TRULY thought about Fatty's comments (his 'joke') about Freddie, poof, poo bay, cock, etc. You think that's all OK then, yes???? you're gonna ignore that. Thereby giving the impression that's all fine and dandy, and go straight to having a pop at me. Where is your BALANCE and fairness. You think comments like that (joke or otherwise) is ok??? |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:27 |
Donna13 wrote: This thread is a self-imposed intervention. Greg has realized that Queenzone is very bad for his health. The stress has recently caused him to use the "f word" in the Serious forum, quote and get mad at the wrong person, use the word "pal", misunderstand a brilliant humorous post by fatty, and also to eat a really bad (probably with fake ingredients) custard tart while stealing his neighbor's wireless internet connection. The problem is that whenever he comes here he is attacked by a mob of people who really just want to get to Brian and Roger and/or get their hands on the contents of the archives.DONNA. YOU SPEAK MUCH SENSE. HOW COME YOU REMAIN HERE, SO LONG, SO CALM - STILL, AND NOT EVEN A FEATHER RUFFLED???? HOW DO YOU MANAGE TO NOT GET THE HUMP WITH SOME OF THESE PEOPLE AND THEIR... 'JOKES'? SUCH A DEAR FATTY AND HIS PECULIAR ATTITUDE TO GAY PEOPLE. I CAN'T DO IT. THEY GET UP MY NOSE WITH THEIR 'STUFF'. I TAKE MY ENGLISH HAT OFF TO YOU, HOPING THAT THAT TRANSLATES!!! I AGREE WITH YOU. A LOT OF THESE ARSEHOLES ON HERE - OH LORD, ANOTHER SWEAR WORD SLIPPED OUT... PEOPLE ON HERE, DO SEEM TO VENT THEIR FRUSTRATION OUT ON ME. I DON'T CARE, MIND YOU... LIKE THAT WOULD BOTHER ME. I GIVE AS GOOD AS I GET, STILL, AS YOU KNOW, AND GENERALLY MANAGE TO RUFFLE MORE OPPOSING FEATHERS THAN THEY MANAGE OF MINE... BUT IT DOES GET TEDIOUS, I WON'T DENY. DONNA... WHY DON'T YOU HAVE A LITTLE STINT AT RUNNING THIS SITE FOR A WHILE!!!!!! ALL POWER TO YOU, AGAIN. I LIKE YOUR 'WAY' WITH WORDS. I'M GOING BACK TO READ A BIT MORE NOW... AND POSSIBLY WIND A FEW MORE PEOPLE UP, AND WATCH THEM FLY. THEY DISH IT OUT 24/7 BUT DON'T LIKE IT WHEN IT COMES BACK AT EM. UH! BLESS 'EM! |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:31 |
Steven wrote: How can Queen's very own archivist, who is supposed to honorably represent the band, be such an annoying jerk on a Queen fan site? This thread, in particular, is very incoherent. This brings me to my skepticism. Is this truly the real and definitive Greg Brooks? Or is it possible, just possible, that this is just a fake trying to get everybody excited? I strongly encourage everybody to take a step back for a moment and analyze this very carefully. If anyone can offer any form of evidence to prove that he is the real deal, please do! Until then, I'm not convinced. I haven't been for the longest time.I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER. HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING. NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK. IT TRULY IS ME. HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:32 |
Bad Horsie wrote: Mr. Greg Brooks, you are well invited to my birthday party. Cheers, HorWHEN IS IT? WILL THE MUSIC BE GOOD? SHALL I BRING A BOTTLE OR TWO? |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:36 |
brENsKi wrote: the "2 greatest band of alltime" is fast becoming a laughing stock...because they appear to employ tossers who have little regard for anything other than wanking off their own egos on this site... you don;t get GB's quality of shite on forums of other decent bands....no wonder that queen have little international music-biz credibilty with morons like GB in charge of the crown jewels...i wouldn;t trust the tw*t with a bag of fucking conkers!!!!WELL SAID! I CAN'T FAULT THAT. NASTY AS THIS COMMENT IS, I CAN'T HELP BUT THINK I'D LIKE THIS PERSON IF I MET THEM IN A PUB. CALM DOWN, THOUGH. DON'T BE SO... PERSONAL. BE NICE. BY THE WAY. I AM NOT 'EMPLOYED'. I HAVE MY OWN COMPANY, AM SELF EMPLOYED. BUT QUEEN IS MY MAIN CLIENT. GO HAVE SOME BISCUITS AND CURB YOUR NASTINESS A WHILE. OK. LOVE TO YOU. AND PEACE. |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 20:43 |
Bad Seed wrote:GB. OH PLEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!!Queen Archivist wrote: THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's. YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU REALLY ARE SERIOUS. THEY'VE SOLD 130 MILLION RECORDS, BAD SEED. LONG BEFORE THE MOANZONE MOANERS WERE MOANING AND WHINGING HERE. YOU THINK THEY NEED TO TUNE INTO YOUR WAVELENGTH? THIS WILL BENEFIT THEM SOMEHOW. OH NO. NO. NO. NO. A MILLION TIMES NO. WHAT GREAT IDEAS DO YOU IMAGINE RT AND BM STUMBLING ACROSS HERE THEN??????? AND EVEN IF THERE ARE SOME, THEY'D HAVE TO DIG THRU ENDLESS BANAAL AND OFFENSIVE STUFF TO FIND IT. WOULD YOU, IN ALL HONESTLY, SHOVEL THROUGH A FIELD FULL OF COW DUNG, TO FIND THE TWO GOOD IDEAS THAT MIGHT LURK THERE SOMEWHERE??? NO YOU WOULD NOT. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's THAT IS VERY VERY VERY FUNNY DEAR PERSON. DERANGED, MISGUIDED AS HELL, BUT FUNNY. |
| Smitty 31.07.2008 21:09 |
Guys, something tells me we've struck a nerve. |
| Smitty 31.07.2008 21:13 |
Queen Archivist wrote:Well that proves it. QP Ltd. cares little to nothing about the opinion of the fans, which only leaves one question that I feel the need to ask:Bad Seed wrote:GB. OH PLEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!! YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU REALLY ARE SERIOUS. THEY'VE SOLD 130 MILLION RECORDS, BAD SEED. LONG BEFORE THE MOANZONE MOANERS WERE MOANING AND WHINGING HERE. YOU THINK THEY NEED TO TUNE INTO YOUR WAVELENGTH? THIS WILL BENEFIT THEM SOMEHOW. OH NO. NO. NO. NO. A MILLION TIMES NO. WHAT GREAT IDEAS DO YOU IMAGINE RT AND BM STUMBLING ACROSS HERE THEN??????? AND EVEN IF THERE ARE SOME, THEY'D HAVE TO DIG THRU ENDLESS BANAAL AND OFFENSIVE STUFF TO FIND IT. WOULD YOU, IN ALL HONESTLY, SHOVEL THROUGH A FIELD FULL OF COW DUNG, TO FIND THE TWO GOOD IDEAS THAT MIGHT LURK THERE SOMEWHERE??? NO YOU WOULD NOT. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's THAT IS VERY VERY VERY FUNNY DEAR PERSON. DERANGED, MISGUIDED AS HELL, BUT FUNNY.Queen Archivist wrote: THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here. If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's. When will the Wembley '86 concert be re-released, and will you include a video of the new Wembley stadium being built in the special features? |
| steven 35638 31.07.2008 21:22 |
Queen Archivist wrote:Just because you tell us you're Greg Brooks doesn't necessarily mean you're Greg Brooks.Steven wrote: How can Queen's very own archivist, who is supposed to honorably represent the band, be such an annoying jerk on a Queen fan site? This thread, in particular, is very incoherent. This brings me to my skepticism. Is this truly the real and definitive Greg Brooks? Or is it possible, just possible, that this is just a fake trying to get everybody excited? I strongly encourage everybody to take a step back for a moment and analyze this very carefully. If anyone can offer any form of evidence to prove that he is the real deal, please do! Until then, I'm not convinced. I haven't been for the longest time.I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER. HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING. NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK. IT TRULY IS ME. HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! |
| Queen Archivist 31.07.2008 21:49 |
Steven wrote:Oh! Yes. Good point. You're right. I'm not really me Stevo.Queen Archivist wrote:Just because you tell us you're Greg Brooks doesn't necessarily mean you're Greg Brooks.Steven wrote: How can Queen's very own archivist, who is supposed to honorably represent the band, be such an annoying jerk on a Queen fan site? This thread, in particular, is very incoherent. This brings me to my skepticism. Is this truly the real and definitive Greg Brooks? Or is it possible, just possible, that this is just a fake trying to get everybody excited? I strongly encourage everybody to take a step back for a moment and analyze this very carefully. If anyone can offer any form of evidence to prove that he is the real deal, please do! Until then, I'm not convinced. I haven't been for the longest time.I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER. HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING. NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK. IT TRULY IS ME. HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! |
| -fatty- 2850 31.07.2008 23:40 |
Dear Mr Archivist Thank you so much for getting back in touch so soon. I think that if I were to respond in a similar fashion, things might get a bit confusing so I'll just answer the points you have raised in caps and you (or anyone else that's interested) can refer back to the original post to read the points that you were addressing. Okay, here goes. GB: FATTY, I WAS NOT REMOTELY OFFENDED. THAT'S THE FIRST THING TO SAY. I MERELY POINTED OUT THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOU DO EXIST, AND DO SAY NASTY THINGS... AND YOU DO. YOU AND YOUR WORDS COMPLETELY ENDORSED THE EXACT POINT I WAS MAKING. IT IS YOUR ASSUMPTION THAT I AM OFFENDED. I HONESTLY AM NOT. YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION AND SENSE OF HUMOUR. I PERSONALLY THINK IT'S JUST A VERY STRANGE THING TO SEE ON A SITE THAT'S SUPPOSEDLY (MOST PEOPLE WOULD REASONABLY IMAGINE) INTENDED TO ENCOMPASS REAL QUEEN FANS. Am I right in thinking that the reason you dragged my name into an argument, I had nothing whatsoever to do with, was not that you took offence at my post but that you were pointing out that people like me exist? "People like me" being people who say nasty things. Given the fact that in your last post you called me, among other things, a faceless coward and a turd that needs to be put out of it's misery, perhaps we should amend that phrase to "people like us". As for this site being intended for real Queen fans, I'll make a deal with you. If you can provide me with the definition of a real Queen fan and you can convince Richard Orchard to adopt a policy of excluding anyone who fails to come up to those standards, I'll cancel my account and never darken Queenzone's door again. YOUR PUERILE AND HOMOPHOBIC ATTEMPT AT A JOKE, TO MY MIND, HAS NO PLACE ON A SITE LIKE THIS, OR ANYWHERE... WHERE FOR EXAMPLE A YOUNGSTER MIGHT FIND SUCH THINGS AS YOU TALKING ABOUT FREDDIE, AND COCK, FAGGOT, POOF, AND POO BAY, AND ALL THOSE OTHER HORRIBLE THINGS. My puerile and homophobic attempts at jokes have been around since 2001 and are generally well recieved. And if by some chance a youngster becomes mentally scarred after reading one of my posts all I have to say is fuck them! If they can't handle a rude word or three, they're never going to make it in the big bad world anyway. I'M NOT OFFENDED, CHUM, JUST A BIT DISAPPOINTED. YOU ARE A QUEEN FAN????? IF SO, HOW YOU CAN YOU WRITE THAT SHIT? I ought to point out that I'm no longer a Queen fan but I was writing the same kind of shit while I was a fan so go figure, eh? I'M NOT OFFENDED. AND I REALISED IT WAS A JOKE. BUT CAN'T YOU SEE THAT IT WAS REALLY RATHER NASTY AND REPULSIVE? OR DO YOU NEED OTHERS TO POINT THAT OUT FOR YOU? Of course I realised it was nasty and repulsive. If I could have been bothered, I would have gone on to use other homosexual references such as "pillow biter", "shit-stabber", "fudge-packer", "uphill gardener". The list goes on and on with each reference more nasty and repulsive than the last. But the joke was aimed at the morons who try to lure the more sensitive fans with the same old "Was Freddie Gay?" thread. What tickles me more than anything is else is the fact that almost everyone apart from yourself gets the joke. I BET HE/SHE REALLY ENJOYED YOUR DISCUSTING AND BELITTLING AND DEGRADING 'VIEW' VOCABULARY. This is the response you gave to my remark about having a best friend that is gay...probably. I can assure you that he/she took no offence because he/she dosen't actually exist. He/she was nothing more than a fictional character intended to be the butt of a joke that wasn't exactly subtle in the first place. Your gullability is an issue you really should work on. I'M BETTING YOU ARE A TEENAGER. Okay I'll take that bet. Now where do I collect my winnings YOU WILL ONE DAY REALISE HOW DEGRADING AND UNNECESSARY YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS WAS FOR YOUR... 'JOKE'. Perhaps one day, you'll understand the basic structure of a 'joke'. LIKE ANYONE IS SUPPOSED TO KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT'S YOU!!!!!!!!!! STUPID THING TO SAY. EVERYONE KNOWS VERY WELL WHO I AM ON THIS SITE. 'FATTY' MEANS NOTHING TO ME. ANYWAY, THAT WASN'T THE REAL POINT. IT WASN'T THE IMPORTANT THING I FOCUSSED ON. These are nothing more than examples of a dangerously over-inflated ego and have little to do with the discussion in hand. OK, NOT A COWARD THEN, SCOTT. BUT YOU STILL COME ACROSS AS HOMOPHOBIC WITH YOUR NASTY LITTLE JOKE THAT WASN'Y A JOKE - JUST AN ILLUSTRATION OF HOW YOUR MIND WORKS. NO, I STILL THINK I'D RATHER AVOID YOU... HAVING HEARD A LITTLE OF HOW YOUR MIND TICKS... LET'S REMIND EVERYONE OF HOW 'NOT' HONOPHOBIC YOU ARE (OR MIGHT BE PERCEIVED) WITH YOUR REALLY FUNNY JOKE... SCOTT... ASK YOUR PROBABLY GAY FRIEND HOW FUNNY AND SENSITIVE AND MATURE HE/SHE THINKS YOUR JOKE IS. Believe me Mr Archivist, If there was anything I could do to convince you that I am in no way homophobic.... I still wouldn't bother. Your opinion of me gives me no more concern than I would give to a cloudy day. I had hoped that this argument/discussion or whatever you care to call it might provide a bit of sport but I've had more entertaining arguments with Jake Britt. You start a thread, the point of which is to demonstrate your right to express an opinion that might not be shared by everyone then use a joke I made as an example of the kind of opinions that ought to be banned. It seems to me that you have made a complete tit of yourself and that pesky ego of yours wont let you leave it. Just so you know, I'm up for taking this discussion further but I honestly don't think you've got the bus fares for it. Your good pal fatty |
| john bodega 01.08.2008 01:32 |
fatty wrote: And if by some chance a youngster becomes mentally scarred after reading one of my posts all I have to say is fuck them! If they can't handle a rude word or three, they're never going to make it in the big bad world anyway. |
| Queen Archivist 04.08.2008 08:24 |
Dear Fatty, Say something REALLY nice about me. Go on!!!! I dare you. Something complimentary, you little tease. |
| Benn 04.08.2008 16:35 |
Greg, are you SURE you're not really Kevin Pietersen in disguise? Aren't you supposed to be plotting the imminent demise of South Africa whilst heralding a new dawn for English Cricket and an assault on the Aussies next summer? Surely you can't have this much time on your hands given that you've only been in the job 12 hours? Please, do us a favour; get back to the coalface and chip away there like a good little boy. |