Major Tom 12.07.2008 20:02 |
Ok, this might have been discussed here before but i'm too damn lazy to look it up. I recall, in a interview, I think it was with Brian that when Tim Staffell(Not sure about the spelling here) left what was "Smile, not yet Queen" Freddie wasn't a great singer. In fact, a kinda poor one. Does anyone know what he did to get his amazing singing voice in order? Did he practice scales on a tape? Did he take lessons? Anyone know? |
steven 35638 12.07.2008 21:31 |
I sincerely doubt Freddie took lessons. Any good musician, and he did learn to play the piano, knows that practice makes perfect. So, to answer your question, to the very best of my knowledge and ability, he simply sang and sang until his voice became satisfactory. Additional evidence to make the assumption he didn't have vocal lessons is this. Even in 1986 he would strain his voice, and he would have learned ways to avoid that had he taken worthwhile lessons. |
Charlie Brown 13.07.2008 01:18 |
Hi Henke. I don't recall Brian Saying that in a interview but i do recall Roger saying in a program on VH1 Classic that when he first heard Freddie sing his voice was like the bleating of a sheep. I'm unaware of Freddie taking any singing lessons. As far as i know Freddie only took piano lessons while attending boarding school. |
Saif 13.07.2008 02:26 |
Freddie's voice is quite horrible in Ibex' "Communication Breakdown"... But it's quite amazing how he later acquired the voice of "God"... |
Winter Land Man 13.07.2008 03:53 |
Another reason why it took a while for Freddie to get in control of his voice is because he sang with his throat, instead of with his gut. He said all that when he was discussing his throat nodules and why he has them, or at least why they get worse sometimes. He said that in an interview which I think you can find on David Fuller's youtube page. |
Hayek Eva 13.07.2008 03:55 |
P.Freestone writes Freddie never did take vocal lessons. This fact shows he was a God given-born talent, he was growing up practicing singing. |
Raf 13.07.2008 18:15 |
Saif wrote: Freddie's voice is quite horrible in Ibex' "Communication Breakdown"... But it's quite amazing how he later acquired the voice of "God"...And that performance of Jailhouse Rock sounds nothing like those wonderful ones from the rock'n'roll medleys Queen performed in the 70's... |
FriedChicken 13.07.2008 19:17 |
if you listen to those early Wreckage and Ibex recordings you can clearly here that Freddie wasn't a singer back then. Although you can hear (especially in Green) that he had a very nice and gentle vocal sound. But to be honest.. If Freddie was auditioning for my band in the late 60s I am sure I wouldn't have picked him as my singer. Auditioning in the early 70's would be a totally different story of course |
Major Tom 13.07.2008 19:50 |
Yeah you might be right, maybe I mixed up the intreviews. In fact, now that you mention it I think it was Roger, not Brian...BAH! Nevermind. Great to see so many "adult" replies in the general discussion forum! Must be a record of some sort don't you think? SO, generally what most of you guys are saying...with a lot of practice you can get a great voice? I know for damn sure that I sound better that the early Larry Lurex or Wreckage recordings. You'll think that one day I can outshine Freddie Mercury? |
Winter Land Man 13.07.2008 19:57 |
Doubt it. I heard he'd practise while walking down the street as if he's performing a concert, and he'd freak out people while doing so. I used to sing pretty nasally because I was singing with my throat. I started listening to a lot of Peter Wolf (the vocalist of the J. Geils Band), and I wanted to hit some of his long high notes (in such songs as Do You Remember When? and Here Comes That Hurt)... and my ex girlfriend told me I can't sing with my throat, gotta sing with the gut. So she taught me how and I could finally do it after a while. I sing a lot of falsetto stuff. Love singing Brian Wilson's music, I could probably be a great Brian Wilson vocal imitator from his 80s era (Getcha Back, Love And Mercy, I'm So Lonely, Let's Go To Heaven In My Car). |
Charlie Brown 14.07.2008 00:38 |
henke1980 wrote: Yeah you might be right, maybe I mixed up the intreviews. In fact, now that you mention it I think it was Roger, not Brian...BAH! Nevermind. Great to see so many "adult" replies in the general discussion forum! Must be a record of some sort don't you think? SO, generally what most of you guys are saying...with a lot of practice you can get a great voice? I know for damn sure that I sound better that the early Larry Lurex or Wreckage recordings. You'll think that one day I can outshine Freddie Mercury?Everyone gets mixed up Sometimes Henke, don't sweat it. I think that with alot of practice one can improve ones voice. With alot of practice one can probably improve in many areas of human endevour. But in order to be a great singer one probably has to be born with a certain amount of inherent talent. |
FriedChicken 14.07.2008 05:56 |
Technically Freddie wasn't a very great singer. As a few other point out, you can hear his voice getting damaged after a couple of concerts. So in this way you can outshine Freddie if you practice and take lessons. I don't know how your voice sounds, but normally your voice sound doesn't change much after puberty. So you can practice all you want, vocal sound won't change much. If you listen to early Queen recordings he sounds like Freddie, and in 1986 he also sounded like Freddie. Only older and his voice damaged by smoking and drinking. But his vocal sound didn't sound much different. Vocal sound has to do with the shape of the throat, head, nose, all the cavities in your head and more things |
Lady Nyx 16.07.2008 13:50 |
some singers are lucky to know how to use their voices. i was an alto in denial for the longest time. i have abilities to sing high notes but i dont prefer my higher register. my lower one is more pleasent. with freddie, most have said he sang with his throat....baaaaad thing. you can also tell he was shy. sometimes the 'bad sound' of sounding strained is mostly those who have considerably "different" voices, and makes them self concious. luckily he figured out that his different voice could be used for something amazing, and he knew his potential, and kept him going! his flaws were the fact that he was self taught. any vocal teacher or good listener can tell he weilded his voice well, but you can hear his transition notes and such that he didnt properly use the right sections of his voice. im rambling, sorry. |
steven 35638 16.07.2008 15:54 |
^Great post -- you weren't rambling. As inappropriate as his singing techniques were, we can't deny his ability to project himself. He was able to convey emotions effectively. Take for example 'One Year of Love'. While his singing voice sounded edgy and strained, he was still able to deliver with great power and emotion. It's for that very reason I feel we often overlook his destructive technique. Sometimes when Freddie performed live his vocals sounded sketchy and strained -- but the fact remains the concert goers had a great experience. This is because he delivered to them the emotion and raw power of each composition. For what he lacked in technique he made up for in power and determination. I don't think any one of us can say that what he was doing was completely and utterly wrong. Perhaps he wanted his voice the way it was. After all, I recall hearing in an interview that one of the reasons he wouldn't quit smoking is because he liked to hear his voice get raspier. I think that's stupid logic -- but it was his career, and more importantly his singing voice. Say, for example, I wanted to make my trumpet sound more dazzling by shortening the bell. God dammit, I'm a musician! I'll do whatever the hell I want! |
Saif 17.07.2008 01:57 |
Steven wrote: ^Great post -- you weren't rambling. As inappropriate as his singing techniques were, we can't deny his ability to project himself. He was able to convey emotions effectively. Take for example 'One Year of Love'. While his singing voice sounded edgy and strained, he was still able to deliver with great power and emotion. It's for that very reason I feel we often overlook his destructive technique. Sometimes when Freddie performed live his vocals sounded sketchy and strained -- but the fact remains the concert goers had a great experience. This is because he delivered to them the emotion and raw power of each composition. For what he lacked in technique he made up for in power and determination.IMO, Roger Daltrey is a person who had the technique. He didn't have the power and his voice didn't sound that good but he made up for it in technique. Don't you think? |
steven 35638 17.07.2008 10:22 |
Freddie Mercenary / Darth Mercury (Saif) wrote:Actually, I couldn't disagree more. He's always had a powerful voice, and still does. And he certainly sings well, very well in fact. Here are a few performances that caught my attention.Steven wrote: ^Great post -- you weren't rambling. As inappropriate as his singing techniques were, we can't deny his ability to project himself. He was able to convey emotions effectively. Take for example 'One Year of Love'. While his singing voice sounded edgy and strained, he was still able to deliver with great power and emotion. It's for that very reason I feel we often overlook his destructive technique. Sometimes when Freddie performed live his vocals sounded sketchy and strained -- but the fact remains the concert goers had a great experience. This is because he delivered to them the emotion and raw power of each composition. For what he lacked in technique he made up for in power and determination.IMO, Roger Daltrey is a person who had the technique. He didn't have the power and his voice didn't sound that good but he made up for it in technique. Don't you think? link link link He's a very, very talented musician. |
Lady Nyx 19.07.2008 13:10 |
Steven wrote: ^Great post -- you weren't rambling. As inappropriate as his singing techniques were, we can't deny his ability to project himself. He was able to convey emotions effectively. Take for example 'One Year of Love'. While his singing voice sounded edgy and strained, he was still able to deliver with great power and emotion. It's for that very reason I feel we often overlook his destructive technique. Sometimes when Freddie performed live his vocals sounded sketchy and strained -- but the fact remains the concert goers had a great experience. This is because he delivered to them the emotion and raw power of each composition. For what he lacked in technique he made up for in power and determination. I don't think any one of us can say that what he was doing was completely and utterly wrong. Perhaps he wanted his voice the way it was. After all, I recall hearing in an interview that one of the reasons he wouldn't quit smoking is because he liked to hear his voice get raspier. I think that's stupid logic -- but it was his career, and more importantly his singing voice. Say, for example, I wanted to make my trumpet sound more dazzling by shortening the bell. God dammit, I'm a musician! I'll do whatever the hell I want!haha actually, in my lower register, i also love it when mine gets raspier. the one thing i didnt understand with freddies logic is he was afraid to fix his teeth because he thought it would change his sound! |
Yara 19.07.2008 20:16 |
Freddie's vocal technique was in fact superb, probably one of, if not the, finest in the history of rock 'n' roll. From physiological and anatomycal aspects - such as those people have been hinting at - to the whole range of difficulties and shades involved in singing, he managed it all with remarkable flair. He's almost too technical for a rock 'n' roll musician and, if you do watch him sing in many concerts, it hard to find an occasion where he really strains, beyond necessary, his vocal muscles, even when it seems he's shouting - which he's not many times if you take a closer look, it's just that his range was considerable and his voice very powerful. His control over his voice, as well as his ability to find new ways of singing the songs and creating new musical structures live, on spot, without getting out of tune, is awe-inspiring. I usually tell people who want to learn some singing and enjoy rock and popular music to watch Freddie's performance at Hammersmith Odeon, 1979. It's perfect throughout in terms of posture, breathing, the movement of his mouth - to what extent he felt he needed to open it more and how he moved his lips and his chin - and he works his abdominal muscles to the point of perfection. It's also worth noticing that the shoulders are, except here and there, to give drama to the performance, in the right position - he didn't push them up or forced them up, and he often left them very relaxed or on the right stance. He would strech open his legs to avoid bowing his thorax forward and he'd lean it backwards slightly when necessary, without moving his head to the side too much, which is a sign of a very self-conscious singer in terms of technique. It's all there. His shape and his condition got worse over time, however, he put on some weight and he did have to strain his body a bit later on, but nothing serious. In fact, his later years, like the works and the magic tours, although his physical condition is not that good and he had developed some annoying vocal nodules, are some of his finest in terms of technique and his use of different registers is jaw-dropping, especially when he gets to explore his lower register to its full potential or his falseto skills, which were amazing. Smoking, drinking, putting on weight, all of that made up for the worsening of his physical conditioning, and that's why he sounds so tired in his later years in some concerts, he couldn't stand the tour routine anymore, but the technique was there, and it was tremendous. One of my friends, who's a singer - good one - and not much of a Queen fan, got amazed by Freddie's vocal improvisation in Vienna, 1986, I guess, before they do Under Pressure. The technique is really great throughout, as well as the choice of notes and the way he sounds and the intelligence behind the singing. I think it's quite the contrary: Freddie had a tremendous technique which did make up for his bad physical conditioning at times. I can't think of a more skilled and self-conscious singer, in terms of technique, in rock 'n' roll's history. There are all too many technical aspects to singing and he managed it all, really, to the point of being an encyclopedia when it comes to it. And, of course, he was a musical genius. But, that aside, he did learn a lot of technical aspects, and as most of the greatest popular singers, he did it by himself and took some tips here and there, listened to the stuff he liked, watched the people he admired, and that's it. But he was a musical genius. And then it's an alltogether different history. |
Major Tom 19.07.2008 20:47 |
-I like my voice husky, that's why I smoke. :) |
Winter Land Man 19.07.2008 21:02 |
Yara wrote: Freddie's vocal technique was in fact superb, probably one of, if not the, finest in the history of rock 'n' roll. From physiological and anatomycal aspects - such as those people have been hinting at - to the whole range of difficulties and shades involved in singing, he managed it all with remarkable flair. He's almost too technical for a rock 'n' roll musician and, if you do watch him sing in many concerts, it hard to find an occasion where he really strains, beyond necessary, his vocal muscles, even when it seems he's shouting - which he's not many times if you take a closer look, it's just that his range was considerable and his voice very powerful. His control over his voice, as well as his ability to find new ways of singing the songs and creating new musical structures live, on spot, without getting out of tune, is awe-inspiring. I usually tell people who want to learn some singing and enjoy rock and popular music to watch Freddie's performance at Hammersmith Odeon, 1979. It's perfect throughout in terms of posture, breathing, the movement of his mouth - to what extent he felt he needed to open it more and how he moved his lips and his chin - and he works his abdominal muscles to the point of perfection. It's also worth noticing that the shoulders are, except here and there, to give drama to the performance, in the right position - he didn't push them up or forced them up, and he often left them very relaxed or on the right stance. He would strech open his legs to avoid bowing his thorax forward and he'd lean it backwards slightly when necessary, without moving his head to the side too much, which is a sign of a very self-conscious singer in terms of technique. It's all there. His shape and his condition got worse over time, however, he put on some weight and he did have to strain his body a bit later on, but nothing serious. In fact, his later years, like the works and the magic tours, although his physical condition is not that good and he had developed some annoying vocal nodules, are some of his finest in terms of technique and his use of different registers is jaw-dropping, especially when he gets to explore his lower register to its full potential or his falseto skills, which were amazing. Smoking, drinking, putting on weight, all of that made up for the worsening of his physical conditioning, and that's why he sounds so tired in his later years in some concerts, he couldn't stand the tour routine anymore, but the technique was there, and it was tremendous. One of my friends, who's a singer - good one - and not much of a Queen fan, got amazed by Freddie's vocal improvisation in Vienna, 1986, I guess, before they do Under Pressure. The technique is really great throughout, as well as the choice of notes and the way he sounds and the intelligence behind the singing. I think it's quite the contrary: Freddie had a tremendous technique which did make up for his bad physical conditioning at times. I can't think of a more skilled and self-conscious singer, in terms of technique, in rock 'n' roll's history. There are all too many technical aspects to singing and he managed it all, really, to the point of being an encyclopedia when it comes to it. And, of course, he was a musical genius. But, that aside, he did learn a lot of technical aspects, and as most of the greatest popular singers, he did it by himself and took some tips here and there, listened to the stuff he liked, watched the people he admired, and that's it. But he was a musical genius. And then it's an alltogether different history.I love most of your posts, and they wonderful to read. I think we should get married lol. |
Winter Land Man 19.07.2008 21:11 |
henke1980 wrote: -I like my voice husky, that's why I smoke. :)He did say that, but I think he smoked due to anxiety problems. From what Peter Freestone and Jim Hutton wrote in their books, it sounds like Freddie had some un-diagnosed anxiety issues. Sometimes he'd flip out so much that people would have to hold him down on the floor until he calmed down. He maybe even drank and did cocaine to self-medicate that. Not many people talk about Freddie having anxiety, but I suspect he did. I also suspect he had a severe case of ADHD. He was a nervous man a lot of times. He also had depression, as Peter Jones said that sometimes he'd go into a slump and stay indoors for three weeks at a time and told his minders to just not let anyone talk to him when they called, and had them tell them he was busy. It reminds me a lot of my anxiety and depression problems I've had through the years. As for the ADHD, he was also jumping from one subject to the next, couldn't really sit still, got bored very easily, couldn't stay in a room for too long, etc. Smoking is easy to pick up when you're nervous, bored, and depressed. Freddie's love life wasn't easy it seems. Freddie is said to have left Mary, but I tell you, it is hard to leave someone, no matter what. It's very hard and I'm sure it took an emotional toll on him for years. Then the people he did had relationships with, a lot of them would leave him eventually, or cheat on him, etc. It's a hard life! |
beautifulsoup 20.07.2008 01:56 |
I'm a voice coach...and... (deleted) ...oh, Hell, never mind. I decided I don't want to let myself get involved in any more threads about Freddie's singing. Sorry to have wasted your time. |
Major Tom 20.07.2008 10:23 |
Jacob Britt wrote:Yes, I know he SAID that. That he smoked for his anxity problems is closer to the truth I think. Strange state to be in huh? One day you hide from people in your giant house, afraid of the press and fans waiting to get a glimpse of you. The next day you command 60000 something at wembley stadium to fuck off. I can't understand it! But then again, I'm not Freddie Mercury.henke1980 wrote: -I like my voice husky, that's why I smoke. :)He did say that, but I think he smoked due to anxiety problems. From what Peter Freestone and Jim Hutton wrote in their books, it sounds like Freddie had some un-diagnosed anxiety issues. Sometimes he'd flip out so much that people would have to hold him down on the floor until he calmed down. He maybe even drank and did cocaine to self-medicate that. Not many people talk about Freddie having anxiety, but I suspect he did. I also suspect he had a severe case of ADHD. He was a nervous man a lot of times. He also had depression, as Peter Jones said that sometimes he'd go into a slump and stay indoors for three weeks at a time and told his minders to just not let anyone talk to him when they called, and had them tell them he was busy. It reminds me a lot of my anxiety and depression problems I've had through the years. As for the ADHD, he was also jumping from one subject to the next, couldn't really sit still, got bored very easily, couldn't stay in a room for too long, etc. Smoking is easy to pick up when you're nervous, bored, and depressed. Freddie's love life wasn't easy it seems. Freddie is said to have left Mary, but I tell you, it is hard to leave someone, no matter what. It's very hard and I'm sure it took an emotional toll on him for years. Then the people he did had relationships with, a lot of them would leave him eventually, or cheat on him, etc. It's a hard life! |
Winter Land Man 20.07.2008 21:08 |
henke1980 wrote:Yeah it's pretty weird. I think because, on stage, Freddie felt invincible, and powerful, so he felt safe. He's different. A lot of people with anxiety problems are very different than the people who you see in public. Behind closed doors, they are in-secure.Jacob Britt wrote:Yes, I know he SAID that. That he smoked for his anxity problems is closer to the truth I think. Strange state to be in huh? One day you hide from people in your giant house, afraid of the press and fans waiting to get a glimpse of you. The next day you command 60000 something at wembley stadium to fuck off. I can't understand it! But then again, I'm not Freddie Mercury.henke1980 wrote: -I like my voice husky, that's why I smoke. :)He did say that, but I think he smoked due to anxiety problems. From what Peter Freestone and Jim Hutton wrote in their books, it sounds like Freddie had some un-diagnosed anxiety issues. Sometimes he'd flip out so much that people would have to hold him down on the floor until he calmed down. He maybe even drank and did cocaine to self-medicate that. Not many people talk about Freddie having anxiety, but I suspect he did. I also suspect he had a severe case of ADHD. He was a nervous man a lot of times. He also had depression, as Peter Jones said that sometimes he'd go into a slump and stay indoors for three weeks at a time and told his minders to just not let anyone talk to him when they called, and had them tell them he was busy. It reminds me a lot of my anxiety and depression problems I've had through the years. As for the ADHD, he was also jumping from one subject to the next, couldn't really sit still, got bored very easily, couldn't stay in a room for too long, etc. Smoking is easy to pick up when you're nervous, bored, and depressed. Freddie's love life wasn't easy it seems. Freddie is said to have left Mary, but I tell you, it is hard to leave someone, no matter what. It's very hard and I'm sure it took an emotional toll on him for years. Then the people he did had relationships with, a lot of them would leave him eventually, or cheat on him, etc. It's a hard life! Wanna hear something else strange as well? Some people, sing horrible by themselves, but when people are around, they feel the need to impress, and then end up giving it their all, and they sing beautifully. I know I'm that way, I sing better when people are around, as I can spread the emotions better, and it's like, you're trying to explain to people how you truly feel, with all the emotions you have. Freddie could sing a Brian May ballad so wonderfully, because he could relate to it. Brian always tried to write songs for Queen, in Freddie's point of view, even things such as Fat Bottomed Girls, he thought of how Freddie would do it, before Freddie sang it. |
Sunshine__123456 22.07.2008 02:28 |
In fact I totally disagree with Friedchicken saying people's voice don't change after puberty. Freddie's voicecolour changed through the years. It is easy to hear the difference in colour of let's say: Sheer Heart Attack, The Works and Innuendo/Made in Heaven. His voice was in the end very breakable but also powerful at times. I think the singing on Innuendo and Made in Heaven are his best pieces and some live gigs during the Magic Tours his worst. Listen to I want to Break Free and BoRhap of Wembley and then compare for example the Montreal concerts, what a difference and what a joy to listen to Montreal after you heard the shouting of Wembley. Of course we are spoiled, the level of Freddie during Wembley is so high, lot's of singers would love to get there... But most singers are developing their voice thru the years. Listen to the early Steven Tyler and the Steven Tyler now...amazing how his voice is now, he sings incredible now. Hits all the high notes. Listen to the early Bono and the Bono now. He developed this husky tone in his voice and his colour is much more beautiful.. |