mahlers.com 17.06.2008 17:17 |
Only makes sense I suppose, U2 has a new one coming out and QPR has yet to announce any USA shows yet, but I believe that'll happen come summer or fall 2008. Yea or Nay? W. K. Mahler |
inu-liger 17.06.2008 18:16 |
Nay. |
Smitty 17.06.2008 18:22 |
Hmm, Nay or possibl-ay... |
Treasure Moment 17.06.2008 18:32 |
hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent. |
Erin 17.06.2008 18:42 |
Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.Of course! LOL |
Winter Land Man 17.06.2008 20:11 |
If Freddie was alive, he'd definetely not tour with U2... he'd be more likely to kick Bono's ass! |
steven 35638 17.06.2008 22:05 |
Nay. Queen and Paul Rodgers don't need to share the stage with anybody else. |
thunderbolt 31742 18.06.2008 00:35 |
Definitely nay. I doubt that our boys would be interested in opening for U2, and I doubt that U2 would be interested in bringing a well-known act that would draw its own fans along for the ride, instead of bringing a lesser-known band that won't take seats away from the U2 fans. |
QueenMercury46 18.06.2008 02:25 |
Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.U2 is a great band. stfu Everyone is sick of you saying this about every band/ singer that is mentioned. |
Treasure Moment 18.06.2008 04:04 |
QueenMercury46 wrote:fuck off and shut the fuck up yourself! i say whatever i want, if you dont like it too bad for you!Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.U2 is a great band. stfu Everyone is sick of you saying this about every band/ singer that is mentioned. |
gnomo 18.06.2008 06:27 |
Nay. Neither band needs the other to steal part of the public attention from them. Plus, I can't stand U2... :-P |
pittrek 18.06.2008 06:29 |
Jacob Britt wrote: If Freddie was alive, he'd definetely not tour with U2... he'd be more likely to kick Bono's ass!I think he would do something else with his ass :-) |
thomasquinn 32989 18.06.2008 07:04 |
pittrek wrote:Especially considering Live Aid :PJacob Britt wrote: If Freddie was alive, he'd definetely not tour with U2... he'd be more likely to kick Bono's ass!I think he would do something else with his ass :-) |
onevsion 18.06.2008 07:54 |
U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums. |
onevsion 18.06.2008 07:56 |
Treasure Moment wrote:your parents must be proud to have you as their lovely child. So well mannered, great...QueenMercury46 wrote:fuck off and shut the fuck up yourself! i say whatever i want, if you dont like it too bad for you!Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.U2 is a great band. stfu Everyone is sick of you saying this about every band/ singer that is mentioned. |
Treasure Moment 18.06.2008 09:12 |
Ducksoup wrote:I dont care what my parents or anyone else thinks, i speak my mind and say whatever the hell i want.Treasure Moment wrote:your parents must be proud to have you as their lovely child. So well mannered, great...QueenMercury46 wrote:fuck off and shut the fuck up yourself! i say whatever i want, if you dont like it too bad for you!Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.U2 is a great band. stfu Everyone is sick of you saying this about every band/ singer that is mentioned. |
SRhye 18.06.2008 13:52 |
NO no no no no no I really do hate u2. Queen + Paul Rodgers are two of rocks greatest forces as it is, they don't need bloody Bono bringing it down. Now Kiss or Motorhead are package bands. Queen definitely arent, and being honest, neither are U2. Theyre nothing alike either, would be a wierd combination. Not a very pleasing overall effect either in a live situation. |
Treasure Movement 18.06.2008 14:50 |
Treasure Moment wrote:You jump to the conclusion that he had parents in the first place.Ducksoup wrote:I dont care what my parents or anyone else thinks, i speak my mind and say whatever the hell i want.Treasure Moment wrote:your parents must be proud to have you as their lovely child. So well mannered, great...QueenMercury46 wrote:fuck off and shut the fuck up yourself! i say whatever i want, if you dont like it too bad for you!Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.U2 is a great band. stfu Everyone is sick of you saying this about every band/ singer that is mentioned. |
Major Tom 18.06.2008 17:56 |
Treasure Moment wrote: hopefully not, i HATE U2, totally crappy music with zero talent.*Look who's talking* |
Rubbersuit 18.06.2008 21:49 |
Hey... Coldplay has a new CD out too... let's lump them in. U2, Queen and Coldplay... coming to a city near you! |
Lord Kinbote 19.06.2008 19:28 |
Rubbersuit wrote: Hey... Coldplay has a new CD out too... let's lump them in. U2, Queen and Coldplay... coming to a city near you!Don't forget: Jakob Dylan just released a new album, so expect to see him on the same tour. . . . Did I hear something about U2? link |
Treasure Moment 20.06.2008 09:34 |
Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Major Tom 20.06.2008 17:37 |
Treasure Moment wrote:mmm...yeah.Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Treasure Moment 20.06.2008 22:05 |
henke1980 wrote:yes thats rightTreasure Moment wrote:mmm...yeah.Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Tero 21.06.2008 04:45 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Treasure Moment 21.06.2008 05:28 |
Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Joeker 22.06.2008 00:29 |
Who wouldn't want to see Boner?! |
QueenMercury46 22.06.2008 02:20 |
Treasure Moment wrote:So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
john bodega 22.06.2008 03:50 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Hmmm........ It's interesting how even a shitty band like U2 still has : * More songs than you. * A singer with better range. * Better live performances than your non-existing ones. I hate U2, but explain to me how you're better when you haven't even done anything? |
Treasure Moment 22.06.2008 04:17 |
Zebonka12 wrote:Come on zebonka, you very well know that they are not even close when it comes to musicality, they are amaterus who play shitty emotionless songs. Of course they have more song because they have been active for decades, we have been for less than 3 years and we have over 20 songs but those 20 songs are faar better musically than they could ever hope to write.Treasure Moment wrote: Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Hmmm........ It's interesting how even a shitty band like U2 still has : * More songs than you. * A singer with better range. * Better live performances than your non-existing ones. I hate U2, but explain to me how you're better when you haven't even done anything? |
Treasure Moment 22.06.2008 04:19 |
QueenMercury46 wrote:well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.Treasure Moment wrote:So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Sergei. 22.06.2008 09:05 |
While we're at it.. *Cough*MOZART*Cough* |
Treasure Moment 22.06.2008 10:22 |
Sergei? wrote: While we're at it.. *Cough*MOZART*Cough*mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great. |
Sergei. 22.06.2008 12:41 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Material?Sergei? wrote: While we're at it.. *Cough*MOZART*Cough*mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great. Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is. Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club? |
Treasure Moment 22.06.2008 15:49 |
Sergei? wrote:works, pieces... they are all the same as for material. Mozart was great indeed but he cant beat freddie, no one can or will ever be able to.Treasure Moment wrote:Material? Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is. Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club?Sergei? wrote: While we're at it.. *Cough*MOZART*Cough*mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great. |
Sergei. 22.06.2008 16:05 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I hear they gave each other regular blow jobs.Sergei? wrote:works, pieces... they are all the same as for material. Mozart was great indeed but he cant beat freddie, no one can or will ever be able to.Treasure Moment wrote:Material? Alright. This is Mozart we're speaking of, not Treasure Moment. World famous, timeless musicians of the classical period do not have "Material". They have works. Pieces. Whatever the plural of "opus" is. Mozart *has* more skills? I'm assuming then that he's still alive as well, most likely disc jockeying at some underground club?Sergei? wrote: While we're at it.. *Cough*MOZART*Cough*mozart has more skills although not all of his material is great. |
QueenMercury46 23.06.2008 01:19 |
Treasure Moment wrote:How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.QueenMercury46 wrote:well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.Treasure Moment wrote:So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Treasure Moment 23.06.2008 03:28 |
QueenMercury46 wrote:Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.Treasure Moment wrote:How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.QueenMercury46 wrote:well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.Treasure Moment wrote:So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
QueenMercury46 23.06.2008 03:36 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Oh yes, master of music, you know EVERYTHING about anything. YOU are the expert of all there is about music.QueenMercury46 wrote:Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.Treasure Moment wrote:How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.QueenMercury46 wrote:well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.Treasure Moment wrote:So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
Treasure Moment 23.06.2008 05:03 |
QueenMercury46 wrote:Yes i can analyze music.Treasure Moment wrote:Oh yes, master of music, you know EVERYTHING about anything. YOU are the expert of all there is about music.QueenMercury46 wrote:Im not sure if i can prove it to you because you simply dont seem to understand but as a musician i can hear if a band has talent, good songwriting skills, good musical skills and if the songwriting is predictable or not etc and U2 is a very amateurish band with crappy songs.Treasure Moment wrote:How can you prove your songwriting skills are better than those of U2? That's right, you can't.QueenMercury46 wrote:well, simply our songwriting and skills. They simply arent on the same level as us or Queen. Queen is about 1 million times better musicians than U2.Treasure Moment wrote:So what exactly makes your band so much better than U2? I'd like to know.Tero wrote:Not any band but certainly U2, rolling stones, the beatles, coldplay and garbage like that, basically the mainstream crap. I would never say that we are musically more skilled than Queen for example becuase that would be a lie. Im not arrogant, im just saying the truth about things.Treasure Moment wrote:I can believe you're great in musical pissing (and your fantasies would probably involve golden showers), but do you have the talent or songwriting skills to beat any band?Ducksoup wrote: U2, the biggest rock band in the world at the moment, doesn't need Queen + Paul Rodgers. Queen + Paul Rodgers fill arenas. U2 fill stadiums.my band musically pisses all over U2 and thats a fact. |
john bodega 23.06.2008 06:08 |
I expect your analysis to be written in crayon, no less. You're fucking clueless sometimes, man.... I hate U2, but really. It doesn't make you any less of an ass. |
Treasure Moment 23.06.2008 07:21 |
Zebonka12 wrote: I expect your analysis to be written in crayon, no less. You're fucking clueless sometimes, man.... I hate U2, but really. It doesn't make you any less of an ass.zebonka im not clueless, i know exactly what im talking about and im not arrogant, if i hear something that is quality i will say it, like someone mentioned TSO and i checked them out and it was much better than bands like U2 for example. |
Smitty 23.06.2008 10:10 |
Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment? |
Treasure Moment 23.06.2008 10:51 |
Smitty wrote: Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment?There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship. |
Micrówave 23.06.2008 12:38 |
Treasure Moment wrote:The fucking Pet Shop Boys? Alphaville?Smitty wrote: Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment?There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship. You big faggie. And I don't mean that in the homosexual context. Thanks for including Europe. At least NOW you give them credit. |
Treasure Moment 23.06.2008 13:32 |
Micrówave wrote:once again, to you my site and tell me where its europe, whats wrong with pet shop boys and alphaville? they have made very good songs.Treasure Moment wrote:The fucking Pet Shop Boys? Alphaville? You big faggie. And I don't mean that in the homosexual context. Thanks for including Europe. At least NOW you give them credit.Smitty wrote: Can you name 5 quality bands excluding Queen and Treasure Moment?There are alot of quality songs from different bands but not all of their stuff, it just shows that they are capable of good quality musicianship and songwriting. For example artists like guns and roses, metallica, europe, yngwie malmsteen, sepultura, alphaville, george michael, tears for fears, vangelis, pet shop boys have all proved to be capable of making solid creative good songwriting with good musicianship. |
Micrówave 23.06.2008 17:35 |
Okay, I'll break it down for you. Apologies to the Smarter than a 3rd grader guy. (1) If you listen to Suburbia and you think it's really great, then you're an idiot. (2) If you know any songs by Alphaville, then you're an idiot. (3) If you don't "get" my Europe reference, then you've learned nothing here and you're still an idiot. So let's sum it up. Final results: You're an idiot ADDENDUM: Pet Shop Boys and Alphaville are not Queen, and by using your mental powers we have learned that any band not named Queen AND containing four people is second rate and your band is better. So now are you claiming you're in the same league as The Pet Shop Boys and Alphaville. Ok, you win. |
Treasure Moment 23.06.2008 17:53 |
Micrówave wrote: Okay, I'll break it down for you. Apologies to the Smarter than a 3rd grader guy. (1) If you listen to Suburbia and you think it's really great, then you're an idiot. (2) If you know any songs by Alphaville, then you're an idiot. (3) If you don't "get" my Europe reference, then you've learned nothing here and you're still an idiot. So let's sum it up. Final results: You're an idiot ADDENDUM: Pet Shop Boys and Alphaville are not Queen, and by using your mental powers we have learned that any band not named Queen AND containing four people is second rate and your band is better. So now are you claiming you're in the same league as The Pet Shop Boys and Alphaville. Ok, you win.as i said alphaville and pet shop boys have great songs. |
The Exhibitionist 23.06.2008 21:11 |
Alright, seriously, U2 is one of the greatest bands ever. Bono is like, Jesus. But they can't beat Queen obviously. |
Treasure Moment 24.06.2008 02:58 |
Conor (!) wrote: Alright, seriously, U2 is one of the greatest bands ever. Bono is like, Jesus. But they can't beat Queen obviously.1. wrong 2. wrong 3. right |
Sergei. 24.06.2008 08:44 |
Conor (!) wrote: Alright, seriously, U2 is one of the greatest bands ever. Bono is like, Jesus. But they can't beat Queen obviously."I'm a bisexual Slavic" ? I'm a transsexual German. |
Mike In NY 24.06.2008 15:30 |
Actually guys... Queen and U2 recently played here in states..they even collaborated on "One"....have a look for yourself: link ;) |
The Exhibitionist 24.06.2008 22:07 |
Brilliant |