rockthecosmos2008 24.04.2008 16:38 |
Hello Just wondering how many people would love to see John touring with the lads in 2008? Put your name and country, and John if you get to see this, take some notice!! |
PieterMC 24.04.2008 16:39 |
Not a chance of this ever happening unfortunately. |
Treasure Moment 24.04.2008 17:53 |
john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died. |
Jjeroen 24.04.2008 17:59 |
Of course we would ALL want to see him. But he's been very clear about HIS opion. Let the man be! |
Winter Land Man 24.04.2008 18:05 |
John Deacon makes Pejonka happy. John Deacon is a recluse now, more of a recluse Freddie was before he died. Why must John NEVER come out in public? I haven't a clue, and it's scary. He's one of those celebrities that will die someday, and you won't know about it until 10 years later, because he's so reclusive. I wish he'd come out of his cabin (hermitage) on the big hill in Madawaska, Maine, and get some fresh air to breathe. |
patronus87 24.04.2008 18:07 |
Yes... I want John Deacon...... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
david (galashiels) 24.04.2008 18:07 |
to see john back would be nice.but,as statted a few times he will not play with queen.he may return as part of something new or the likes of the immortals,but i doubt it will be a part of q+.shame but thats life. |
write your letters in the sand 24.04.2008 18:18 |
Sadly, this won't happen. Early on, John recognized the massive talent that is Treasure Moment, and bowed out gracefully before Queen was put to shame by the sheer force of the virtuosity that is . . . Treasure Moment. Oh yeah. |
Pierre 24.04.2008 18:30 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.r! Hey TM for fuck sake Queen is Queen with Fred or Without... so shut up your only a fan dammit ! if you like Queen era 1971-1991 stick with it or be a bakotsträvare !! or listening to SMGON it the end... hur svårt kan det vara |
Pierre 24.04.2008 18:31 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.r! Hey TM for fuck sake Queen is Queen with Fred or Without... so shut up your only a fan dammit ! if you like Queen era 1971-1991 stick with it or be a bakotsträvare !! or listening to SMGON it the end... hur svårt kan det vara |
QueenMercury46 24.04.2008 18:37 |
It's not gonna happen.
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.Oh shut up. |
shieldmatron 24.04.2008 19:41 |
While Freddie predicted he'd be a legend, and Bri and Rog want to keep making music, John said that he thought the whole Queen thing would last about 5 years. Walking away might not have been that difficult after the loss of Freddie. He's retired and he's earned it. But as far as a petition...if we petitioned for certain members on QZ to drop dead, do you think they would just because we asked? |
brian-harold-may 26643 24.04.2008 21:49 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.yet you regard no one but you as a queen song? your confusing mate...did the song nto have any heart...your posts are now getting tedious and to be honest nto even interesting. and no contradictory. |
Mr Faron Hyte 24.04.2008 23:09 |
shieldmatron wrote: But as far as a petition...if we petitioned for certain members on QZ to drop dead, do you think they would just because we asked?Now you're talking about some fun. |
goinback 24.04.2008 23:36 |
Bring back that Leroy Brown as well! |
steven 35638 24.04.2008 23:59 |
I don't think John has what it takes anymore -- depending upon how much he's practiced. The man has been absent from the public eye for a decade now. Damn shame. |
queenfanbg 25.04.2008 00:13 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.Nothing to add... |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 00:34 |
Pierre wrote:for fucks sake, Queen is NOT Queen without freddie, they are smile without him.Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.r! Hey TM for fuck sake Queen is Queen with Fred or Without... so shut up your only a fan dammit ! if you like Queen era 1971-1991 stick with it or be a bakotsträvare !! or listening to SMGON it the end... hur svårt kan det vara |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 00:34 |
<font color="sky blue">QueenMercury46 wrote: It's not gonna happen.shut up yourself you so called "fan"Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.Oh shut up. you dont understand Queen like i do because you arent a real fan |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 00:39 |
Brian-Harold-May wrote:no one but you feels like a queen song because its the 3 remaining members playing without anyone else. When they start to bring in 3 or 4 new people into the band its not Queen.Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.yet you regard no one but you as a queen song? your confusing mate...did the song nto have any heart...your posts are now getting tedious and to be honest nto even interesting. and no contradictory. If they had continued as a 3 piece i would give it alot more credit than what they are doing now, it still wouldnt be the real Queen because freddie was a HUGE part of the band and without him its just impossible to be as good as they were before. Freddie composed/rearranged everything they did, it was his ideas and his incredible voice that made them the legends they are. Without freddie roger and brian would probably never have been famous. |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 00:57 |
write your letters in the sand wrote: Sadly, this won't happen. Early on, John recognized the massive talent that is Treasure Moment, and bowed out gracefully before Queen was put to shame by the sheer force of the virtuosity that is . . . Treasure Moment. Oh yeah.actually, our songs are waaay better than the stuff ive heard from the new "Queen" and thats not arrogance, its just a fact. If freddie was alive then it would be a whole another story though. |
StoneColdClassicQueen 25.04.2008 01:18 |
As much as I LOVE John Deacon, he doesn't need to come back if he doesn't want to. I respect that. TM, I have so many things to say to you, but I promised myself not to. |
pittrek 25.04.2008 02:28 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.Complete bullshit. John quit for complete different reasons, personal reasons |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 03:50 |
pittrek wrote:those "personal reasons" are EXACTLY what im talking aboutTreasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.Complete bullshit. John quit for complete different reasons, personal reasons |
QUEENROCKS_1991 25.04.2008 05:27 |
QUEEN gonna be alway Queen no matter what happen some band have broken up but still remain same name they dont care what you think they are enjoying it and so are we who cares about the name it lovely to see them playing and keeping Queen songs alive Fred would be proud of that John decide to retire then let him be up to him if he want to come back they will welcome him the band still stay as QUEEN why cry over it waste of time ROCK ON QUEEN :) |
olly1988 25.04.2008 08:10 |
Treasured Moment: actually, our songs are waaay better than the stuff ive heard from the new "Queen" and thats not arrogance, its just a fact. If freddie was alive then it would be a whole another story though. ... Have you heard your stuff lately? Please Use what they call a click track next time your recording, your timing is awful. If you were anything like Queen you would have standards. theres a reason your music has had so little attention on myspace! link |
Mr Faron Hyte 25.04.2008 10:15 |
Treasure Moment wrote: you dont understand Queen like i dommmmmmmmmm .... taste the megalomania ... |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 10:45 |
olly1988 wrote: Treasured Moment: actually, our songs are waaay better than the stuff ive heard from the new "Queen" and thats not arrogance, its just a fact. If freddie was alive then it would be a whole another story though. ... Have you heard your stuff lately? Please Use what they call a click track next time your recording, your timing is awful. If you were anything like Queen you would have standards. theres a reason your music has had so little attention on myspace! linkthat song isnt even finished, it was just something my brother recorded quickly to record the idea, you listen to "nothing lasts" composition and tell me new "Queen"s material is up to same standard when it comes to instrumentation and complexity. |
Matías 25.04.2008 11:05 |
that song isnt even finished, it was just something my brother recorded quickly to record the idea, you listen to "nothing lasts" composition and tell me new "Queen"s material is up to same standard when it comes to instrumentation and complexity. Complexity doesn't mean that your music is good. |
Jessesven 25.04.2008 11:20 |
|
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 12:55 |
Matías wrote:that song isnt even finished, it was just something my brother recorded quickly to record the idea, you listen to "nothing lasts" composition and tell me new "Queen"s material is up to same standard when it comes to instrumentation and complexity. Complexity doesn't mean that your music is good. true but in our case its both complex AND good. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 13:32 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Reading your comments above I'd be grateful if you could back up your arguments/point of view. Stating that Freddie composed/rearranged everything - could you unequivocally prove this please for the rest of us as you obviously know more about Queen than anyone else on this forum. If you can't - don't make the comment!Brian-Harold-May wrote:no one but you feels like a queen song because its the 3 remaining members playing without anyone else. When they start to bring in 3 or 4 new people into the band its not Queen. If they had continued as a 3 piece i would give it alot more credit than what they are doing now, it still wouldnt be the real Queen because freddie was a HUGE part of the band and without him its just impossible to be as good as they were before. Freddie composed/rearranged everything they did, it was his ideas and his incredible voice that made them the legends they are. Without freddie roger and brian would probably never have been famous.Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.yet you regard no one but you as a queen song? your confusing mate...did the song nto have any heart...your posts are now getting tedious and to be honest nto even interesting. and no contradictory. As for stating that Roger and Brian would never have been famous also holds very little water. Both guys are uniquely talented and skilled at their chosen professions. Your comments come across as someone who is a Freddie sycophant and not a real Queen fan. Anyone who is a real Queen fan can appreciate the talents and musical output of any band member with or without Freddie. Let me ask you a question - considering another rock group as an analogy to the current Queen situation - did Genesis fail to be Genesis when Peter Gabriel left? Music adapts and changes as time goes on - living in a timewarp may suit some people but not the vast majority of the Queen following. I love Freddie and Queen's work as much as the next person but I can tell you I'll be first in line to see them tour come the Autumn. The core essence and soul of Queen move on - if some people wish to live in a timewarp continuously ranting at others for no other reason then I feel sorry for them. |
Winter Land Man 25.04.2008 13:45 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Freddie composed/rearranged everything they didWhat a load of crap. |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 14:11 |
Jacob Britt wrote:sorry i didnt mean compose everything, i mean he was very ingaged in the songs of the other members too and rearranged them, just check what he did on its a kind of magic and one vision and that should give you an idea how involved he was in the other songs.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddie composed/rearranged everything they didWhat a load of crap. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 14:45 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Your original statement:Jacob Britt wrote:sorry i didnt mean compose everything, i mean he was very ingaged in the songs of the other members too and rearranged them, just check what he did on its a kind of magic and one vision and that should give you an idea how involved he was in the other songs.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddie composed/rearranged everything they didWhat a load of crap. Freddie composed/rearranged EVERYTHING they did, Can't see how this is a true statement - I can appreciate that he had an influence on the bands material and made above average contribution to the collective output but your statement implies that Freddie controlled all of Queen's output over the years. If I understand your position correctly you simply think Queen can't be Queen without Freddie - I think the majority of people tend to disagree with this point of view. Using the original theme of this thread - John rejoining the group as a lame excuse for pushing the opinion that Queen cannot be Queen without Freddie is clearly missing the point of the original posting. John rejoining the group would be great but something I wouldn't expect. I'm sure not having Freddie in the group had some influence on John's early departure. Constantly going on about Queen can never be the same without Freddie doesn't do anyone any good. Time moves on - some people need to learn to live with this! |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 15:57 |
Im just saying how it is, Queen isnt Queen without freddie, simple as that. The guy wasnt just a musician/singer you can replace. He was a legend! the best singer/frontman/musician of all time and wrote the biggest songs in the world and was the reason why Queen became famous in the first place. Queen would have NEVER gotten this big without freddie, thats a fact and its impossible to replace him. You can clearly see the quality of the material roger and brian are releasing compared to the early stuff with freddie, its not bad but compared to the stuff with freddie its B quality. just face the facts, Freddie was the heart and mind of Queen and although roger,brian and john are all very good and talented musicians freddie was just on a whole another level and despite what freddie himself said, he was their LEADER and THE reason why they became big in the first place. |
Another Roger (re) 25.04.2008 16:40 |
Treasure moment: The music you make are nothing special. You have to understand that music is subjective. I for one would never pay for your music. Its way below average for me. And you should learn to have more respect for others music. You will get nowhere with your attitude. I cant see your talent anyway. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 17:02 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Im just saying how it is, Queen isnt Queen without freddie, simple as that. The guy wasnt just a musician/singer you can replace. He was a legend! the best singer/frontman/musician of all time and wrote the biggest songs in the world and was the reason why Queen became famous in the first place. Queen would have NEVER gotten this big without freddie, thats a fact and its impossible to replace him. You can clearly see the quality of the material roger and brian are releasing compared to the early stuff with freddie, its not bad but compared to the stuff with freddie its B quality. just face the facts, Freddie was the heart and mind of Queen and although roger,brian and john are all very good and talented musicians freddie was just on a whole another level and despite what freddie himself said, he was their LEADER and THE reason why they became big in the first place.I can fully appreciate your sentiments and were you are coming from and I'm sure your feelings are well ment. Queen isn't the SAME without Freddie but reiterating on and on that Queen isn't Queen without Freddie to one and all just isn't a positive approach to take with everyone. What are you attempting to achieve? Do you want Roger and Brian to stop using the Queen name - I don't realistically think you can do anything about this one. From a personal point of view to answer your comments I've been fortunate enough over the years to see Queen with Freddie live. Additionally I've seen Brian May as the Brian May band, and Roger Taylor with the Cross and most recently Queen with Paul Rodgers. I've been following Queen since 1974. Seeing Queen in full swing was one of the most enjoyable experiences I've ever had. Seeing both Brian and Roger perform independently was also very memorable and highly enjoyable. However I must admit seeing Queen + Paul Rodgers on the last tour clearly gave the same feel and buzz as the first time I encountered a Queen gig. I'm sorry even though Freddie was irreplaceable, unique and the best vocal range I'll ever hear or encounter what I attended and took part in was still a Queen gig performed by Queen. Queen are still Queen without Freddie and if you think not try getting in front of the next O2 or any other stage before they go out and try telling the 10,000 plus fans and see the outcome. We all love Freddie but that doesn't mean we stop loving Queen just because Freddie isn't around. Yes he was their LEADER and THE reason why they became big in the first place but I'm sorry to inform you but Queen are still around and not going away. I totally 100% agree Freddie had a massive input in to the group but your comments do a clear disservice to both Brian and Roger. If Freddie was so great why wasn't his solo work better than anything Queen released? He was a massive talent but you appear to totally miss the point. No one is trying to replace Freddie - time just moves on and music continues to evolve. As for the reference that all new material is B quality without Freddie I can't agree with this - are you really saying that a record such as Say It's Not True is worse than say some of the tracks off Hot Space for example. Mind you I like a lot of the Hot Space materials as well before you or anyone else starts. If you want Queen to stop being Queen without Freddie I'm sorry to say that this just isn't going to happen. We are now on to the second large scale tour without Freddie and it's not going to change. No one was more heart broken than me when Freddie died and I can say that with true honesty but I'm grateful for Brian and Roger's return to the stage (Paul's rather cool as well if you want my opinion - which I'm sure you won't). I know when I've been to a Queen concert and I'm sorry to say that Queen really are still Queen. I fully appreciate your comments but I feel sorry for people that can't see what's going on with Queen a |
Oberon 25.04.2008 17:16 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Im just saying how it is, Queen isnt Queen without freddie, simple as that. The guy wasnt just a musician/singer you can replace. He was a legend! the best singer/frontman/musician of all time and wrote the biggest songs in the world and was the reason why Queen became famous in the first place. Queen would have NEVER gotten this big without freddie, thats a fact and its impossible to replace him. You can clearly see the quality of the material roger and brian are releasing compared to the early stuff with freddie, its not bad but compared to the stuff with freddie its B quality. just face the facts, Freddie was the heart and mind of Queen and although roger,brian and john are all very good and talented musicians freddie was just on a whole another level and despite what freddie himself said, he was their LEADER and THE reason why they became big in the first place.I'm sorry, but I've read a lot of your posts, and have to have my say. Yes, Freddie was a great musician, songwriter and singer. And yes, Brian, Roger and John would never have been as successful without him. But I don't believe Freddie would have made himself as much of a success without Brian, and possibly Roger and John either. Barcelona is something special, but I think Mike Moran probably has a lot more to do with it than you might give him credit for. I'm not sure Freddie could have done that on his own. Certainly not in 1987/88. Mr Bad Guy is average at best. The Queen versions of the songs were, in my opinion, a little better, but still not on a par with the best of Queen by any means. Yes, by all accounts Freddie had a significant input on Radio Ga Ga and A Kind Of Magic, but wasn't My Baby Does Me and Rain Must Fall also attributed to him and John, or one or the other? And to me, those aren't the best of songs at all, and I would rather listen to both Say it's Not True and C-Lebrity than either of those two. Brian's songs have been strong (IMO at least) over the years (perhaps less so since No One But You) and my impression is that Freddie would have had very little input into his songs than Rogers or Johns. One of the key elements of Queen's music was Brian's guitar song and arrangement. Although Brian has admitted that some of our favourite riffs (Ogre Battle and Bo Rhap riffs) were Freddie's, I think its irrefutible (sp?) that Brian's unique guitar and guitar sound really electrified (no pun intended) and brought lots of Queen songs to another level beyond whoever wrote it. Sometimes the more I listen to their songs, the more impressed I am. Like Its A Hard Life. I think the song is much better than it appears at first, and the melody underpinning the song, coupled with Brian's layered guitars just makes it so much more special. and there are probably so many more examples that I can't think of off the top of my head and after a bottle of wine So, while I consider Freddie Mercury to be more or less a genius for the best of his output with Queen, I don't believe that he was the only, or even the significantly more important element to the band. Simply, they gelled. Like U2 gel for their flavour of music. Or The Beatles. Or the boys from Abba. Axl, Slash, Duff (and probably Izzy). They just worked. It won't be the same without the four members of Queen. That is a given. But don't give me the crap that Freddie was the be all and end all and that he would have been the legend he is without the others, 'cause I don't believe it, and I don't think Freddie believed that for one moment. He knew that he also needed his bandmates. Otherwise he would have left them at some point in the eighties and done his own thing, and he certainly wouldn't have given his all and almost last breath in order to record everything he could with them. That is how I feel about it, and no-one will convince me otherwise Thank you and good night. |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 17:18 |
Another Roger (re) wrote: Treasure moment: The music you make are nothing special. You have to understand that music is subjective. I for one would never pay for your music. Its way below average for me. And you should learn to have more respect for others music. You will get nowhere with your attitude. I cant see your talent anyway.hah "way below average" haha you give me an example of your "Quality" and besides if you say you cant see our talent then you are just ignorant, blind and simply understand anything about quality music so your opinion doesnt meant anything to me. I respect music that deserves to be respected. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 17:32 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Interesting feedback - I must feel I need to offer a little interjection here. I've never heard any of your music but referring to others as ignorant and blind comes over as something strong and more than a little arrogant to say the least. Surely people play music first because of the love of it and secondly because they want to make something enjoyable for others. Simply being overtly negative because someone doesn't like your style and music isn't the way to impress anyone. I'm sure this will draw loads of new listeners to your output :-)Another Roger (re) wrote: Treasure moment: The music you make are nothing special. You have to understand that music is subjective. I for one would never pay for your music. Its way below average for me. And you should learn to have more respect for others music. You will get nowhere with your attitude. I cant see your talent anyway.hah "way below average" haha you give me an example of your "Quality" and besides if you say you cant see our talent then you are just ignorant, blind and simply understand anything about quality music so your opinion doesnt meant anything to me. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 17:36 |
Oberon wrote:Treasure Moment wrote: Im just saying how it is, Queen isnt Queen without freddie, simple as that. The guy wasnt just a musician/singer you can replace. He was a legend! the best singer/frontman/musician of all time and wrote the biggest songs in the world and was the reason why Queen became famous in the first place. Queen would have NEVER gotten this big without freddie, thats a fact and its impossible to replace him. You can clearly see the quality of the material roger and brian are releasing compared to the early stuff with freddie, its not bad but compared to the stuff with freddie its B quality. just face the facts, Freddie was the heart and mind of Queen and although roger,brian and john are all very good and talented musicians freddie was just on a whole another level and despite what freddie himself said, he was their LEADER and THE reason why they became big in the first place.I'm sorry, but I've read a lot of your posts, and have to have my say. Yes, Freddie was a great musician, songwriter and singer. And yes, Brian, Roger and John would never have been as successful without him. But I don't believe Freddie would have made himself as much of a success without Brian, and possibly Roger and John either. |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 17:50 |
ptrueman wrote:well i only said that because you said the things you said about the music which apparently you havent even heard and if you did you would know that what you said earlier just isnt true :)Treasure Moment wrote:Interesting feedback - I must feel I need to offer a little interjection here. I've never heard any of your music but referring to others as ignorant and blind comes over as something strong and more than a little arrogant to say the least. Surely people play music first because of the love of it and secondly because they want to make something enjoyable for others. Simply being overtly negative because someone doesn't like your style and music isn't the way to impress anyone. I'm sure this will draw loads of new listeners to your output :-)Another Roger (re) wrote: Treasure moment: The music you make are nothing special. You have to understand that music is subjective. I for one would never pay for your music. Its way below average for me. And you should learn to have more respect for others music. You will get nowhere with your attitude. I cant see your talent anyway.hah "way below average" haha you give me an example of your "Quality" and besides if you say you cant see our talent then you are just ignorant, blind and simply understand anything about quality music so your opinion doesnt meant anything to me. |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 17:54 |
Oberon, you are wrong about freddie. He would have become famous without the others. Yes i think they were the perfect team and i have alot of respect of roger, brian and john but we have to face the facts that freddie was on another level. Remember that freddie wrote bohemian rhapsody all by himself and its pretty much the biggest song in the world right? He could have performed that song with other musicians backing him up, also we are the champions. Lets not forget his INCREDIBLY vocals, charisma and frontman abilities. He would have made it with or without the others in the band, he was just super talented. |
Treasure Moment 25.04.2008 18:01 |
ptrueman What i dont understand is how you can consider the current band being Queen since its just roger and brian = smile + bunch of other musicians who have NOTHING to do with Queen whatsoever. Queen is roger, brian, FREDDIE and john. If they performed as a 3 piece with john i would consider it more like Queen than the current state. Having a bunch of unknown people involved and a singer who sings out of sync and bluesy just seems wrong. Also they perform the songs at a much slower and borin pace now. Its like a bad cover band now, i think they should out of respect for freddie and john play under another name but of course they do what they want but that doesnt mean all the Queen fans will buy into it, im one of those who dont. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 18:02 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I think you are getting a little off track here I commented on both 'Another Roger's' posting and your reply. I offered no criticism of your work whatsoever - I simply commented on the attitude towards other people's feedback. When I get the chance I'll pop over to your site and have a listen. Surely one of the aspects of a good musician is the ability to effectively handle their 'public'; something Freddie managed extremely well and something a lot of us need to work on :-)ptrueman wrote:well i only said that because you said the things you said about the music which apparently you havent even heard and if you did you would know that what you said earlier just isnt true :)Treasure Moment wrote:Interesting feedback - I must feel I need to offer a little interjection here. I've never heard any of your music but referring to others as ignorant and blind comes over as something strong and more than a little arrogant to say the least. Surely people play music first because of the love of it and secondly because they want to make something enjoyable for others. Simply being overtly negative because someone doesn't like your style and music isn't the way to impress anyone. I'm sure this will draw loads of new listeners to your output :-)Another Roger (re) wrote: Treasure moment: The music you make are nothing special. You have to understand that music is subjective. I for one would never pay for your music. Its way below average for me. And you should learn to have more respect for others music. You will get nowhere with your attitude. I cant see your talent anyway.hah "way below average" haha you give me an example of your "Quality" and besides if you say you cant see our talent then you are just ignorant, blind and simply understand anything about quality music so your opinion doesnt meant anything to me. |
vadenuez 25.04.2008 18:04 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.As much as we could disagree on many things, this time I'm 100% with you here. |
ptrueman 25.04.2008 18:56 |
Treasure Moment wrote: ptrueman What i dont understand is how you can consider the current band being Queen since its just roger and brian = smile + bunch of other musicians who have NOTHING to do with Queen whatsoever. Queen is roger, brian, FREDDIE and john. If they performed as a 3 piece with john i would consider it more like Queen than the current state. Having a bunch of unknown people involved and a singer who sings out of sync and bluesy just seems wrong. Also they perform the songs at a much slower and borin pace now. Its like a bad cover band now, i think they should out of respect for freddie and john play under another name but of course they do what they want but that doesnt mean all the Queen fans will buy into it, im one of those who dont.I can appreciate your honest comments and opinion and fully respect your point of view. I wouldn't refer to Spike Edney as having nothing to do with Queen - really? A number of times he's referred to as the fifth member of Queen and that was in the 80's during the Magic tour. Personal reason for my comments to your original opinion - I know how it feels to be at a Freddie / Queen concert and it feels just the same now as it always has so for me and I'm sure for thousands of others, Queen clearly still are Queen. Again personally what winds me up are less mature (now I'm sounding old) Queen fans getting all mightier than you about the current Queen line up and what's happening at the moment when they didn't even follow Queen in the late 70s and 80s. Music is extremely subjective. This debate we are having is reflected all over the place at the moment. The key thing is - those who are enjoying the moment with Queen + PR aren't knocking what went before, but are simply moving on; but all I keep coming across are a number of other individuals who appear in the minority but constantly go on about Queen can never be Queen without Freddie. The debate almost becomes religious - instead of BC and AD maybe we should start to categorise the music Queen BF (Before Freddie) ie Smile - Queen With Freddie (later 70s and 80s) and Queen AF (After Freddie). The majority of people appear to like all three. Maybe they should refer to themselves as Queen AF instead of Queen + PR? More seriously I respect your musical ambitions personally and wish you well with this but try and not to be so rough on those individuals who are enjoying Queen's current output and plans. I'm sure we can all respect your enthusiasm and love of Queen and Freddie's work so try and be a little more understanding of other individuals opinions. It should be about enjoying music for what it is and not about continuously ranting the same phrases about if only Freddie was still around. We can't change things - time moves on and so does music. Obviously as you can tell I'm in the Queen + PR camp but I'm from the Queen and Freddie era - I've got the t-shirts, autographs and Queen collection to prove it like thousands of others. If you don't like the current line up and Queen plans fine but don't go running around winding everyone else up. There's loads of groups and individuals that I don't agree with but I've got better things to do than attempting to constantly alter what they like and don't like. Let people enjoy music for what it is - as a musician yourself you should at least appreciate this. |
Deacons 1st Choice 25.04.2008 22:09 |
I say leave John be.... He is perfectly happy at what he is doing now, and i for one would rather have him content. As much as i would enjoy seeing him, i completely understand and respect his choice to remain where he currently is. More power to ya, my friend. |
Mr Faron Hyte 25.04.2008 22:18 |
Totally unrelated but it just occured to me that "Deacons 1st Choice" would be a great name for a brand of instant coffee. |
Treasure Moment 26.04.2008 00:34 |
ptrueman I agree with you about spike as not being a stranger, i was talking mainly about the other people, paul, the guitarist and the bassist. I understand that you just want to enjoy the current music and not get into arguments with people but we have to be honest about the situation you know? could you please explain how you consider this to be Queen when its just roger and brian from the origial lineup and that basically means smile? sure its kinda unfair to call them smile as they are queen members and have been in the band for decades but what im trying to say is that when did Queen become queen? wasnt it when freddie and john joined? i mean without them, is it really Queen or just smile? as you already know freddie was a HUGE part of the band and it was basically him who made the band big and it was his influence on the songs that mae them so succesful. Thats why it feels bad when they call themselves Queen when freddie and john isnt involved. Having bunch of unknown musicians and a singer who doesnt even sing in time simply isnt Queen. I know ive repeated what ive said before now but thats just the way it is, im just saying how things are. you cant just go on without 2 members who have been in the band for 20 YEARS and get some unknown musicians and continue to call yourself Queen you know? |
ptrueman 26.04.2008 05:07 |
Treasure Moment wrote: ptrueman I agree with you about spike as not being a stranger, i was talking mainly about the other people, paul, the guitarist and the bassist. I understand that you just want to enjoy the current music and not get into arguments with people but we have to be honest about the situation you know? could you please explain how you consider this to be Queen when its just roger and brian from the origial lineup and that basically means smile? sure its kinda unfair to call them smile as they are queen members and have been in the band for decades but what im trying to say is that when did Queen become queen? wasnt it when freddie and john joined? i mean without them, is it really Queen or just smile? as you already know freddie was a HUGE part of the band and it was basically him who made the band big and it was his influence on the songs that mae them so succesful. Thats why it feels bad when they call themselves Queen when freddie and john isnt involved. Having bunch of unknown musicians and a singer who doesnt even sing in time simply isnt Queen. I know ive repeated what ive said before now but thats just the way it is, im just saying how things are. you cant just go on without 2 members who have been in the band for 20 YEARS and get some unknown musicians and continue to call yourself Queen you know?I think we are going to have to agree to disagree on some points of view but I do see where you are coming from and I appreciate your stance on the subject. The 'It isn't Queen' group of people need to really ask the question directly to Brian and Roger. From a fans point of view I'd say - have you actually experienced and seen both Queen with Freddie live for real and Queen + PR for real? To me and countless thousands of others it's still Queen but remember this is a collaboration not the Queen of old. All I want to hear is good quality music and for me that's what I'm getting. Coming back to the John topic - sometimes in life you simply decide you've reached a point where you can't relive the moments again and it's time to move on. I can fully respect this and good luck to him. Queen + PR is something new but who wants to live in some kind of musical time lock which to me is where the 'It isn't Queen' group are. People referring to Queen + PR as a bad tribute act is more than a little harsh. Tribute acts are fine but they produce a likeness of an original band. Queen + PR are producing new and existing material which is important - to quote Brian - "It needed to be an ongoing, living, evolving, organic unit." Without this it would have been more of a tribute type situation. I'll continue to enjoy Queen prior to Paul's involvement but I can't help but look forward to the future new tracks coming out and the upcoming tour in the Autumn. |
Oberon 27.04.2008 15:50 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Oberon, you are wrong about freddie. He would have become famous without the others. Yes i think they were the perfect team and i have alot of respect of roger, brian and john but we have to face the facts that freddie was on another level. Remember that freddie wrote bohemian rhapsody all by himself and its pretty much the biggest song in the world right? He could have performed that song with other musicians backing him up, also we are the champions. Lets not forget his INCREDIBLY vocals, charisma and frontman abilities. He would have made it with or without the others in the band, he was just super talented.I agree that Fred may well have become famous on his own or with others, but if you read my words I said he wouldn't have had as much success without them and I stand by that. Conversely, I don't think the others would have got anywhere near the level they did unless Fred had been there, so don't think I don't rate Fred. I just don't think he was EVERYTHING to do with Queen's success. As for John, it's a shame, but he's obviously not wanting to be involved in the music industry, so fair play to him for keeping quiet and letting B+R get on with it. |
Treasure Moment 27.04.2008 16:25 |
Oberon wrote:yes you are right that he wasnt everything in Queen but he was the largest part. Of course i cant deny the awesome guitar playing of brian, johns memorable bass lines and roger has contributed alot too, they were the perfect team.Treasure Moment wrote: Oberon, you are wrong about freddie. He would have become famous without the others. Yes i think they were the perfect team and i have alot of respect of roger, brian and john but we have to face the facts that freddie was on another level. Remember that freddie wrote bohemian rhapsody all by himself and its pretty much the biggest song in the world right? He could have performed that song with other musicians backing him up, also we are the champions. Lets not forget his INCREDIBLY vocals, charisma and frontman abilities. He would have made it with or without the others in the band, he was just super talented.I agree that Fred may well have become famous on his own or with others, but if you read my words I said he wouldn't have had as much success without them and I stand by that. Conversely, I don't think the others would have got anywhere near the level they did unless Fred had been there, so don't think I don't rate Fred. I just don't think he was EVERYTHING to do with Queen's success. As for John, it's a shame, but he's obviously not wanting to be involved in the music industry, so fair play to him for keeping quiet and letting B+R get on with it. Its because of that i dont like to see them playing under the Queen name now because its only 2 of the members and then a bunch of musicians who have nothing to do with queen. they had their time and they have their legacy, why ruin the name with this cover band? i understand that they want to play music but do it under another name because you arent fooling anyone. |
StoneColdClassicQueen 27.04.2008 17:07 |
this thread's dead.. I <3 John Deacon :D |
LucTonnerre 27.04.2008 17:39 |
First of all: I totally agree with Treasure Moment about Queen being nothing without Freddie. I'm not even gonna listen to the new album because from listening to the first 2 songs ( Say it ain't true and that other one they performed live) I know for myself that's it's gonna be a huge pile of crap. Treasure Moment's music is complete crap also and his/her/its way of claiming it to be following the spirit of Queen is absolute bullshit. Reading this forum gives me the impression that Queen fans in general are total losers. You guys are ridiculous... honestly. Get a life. Queen is over. Love the old records. Hate the new ones. There's much better bands around these days... Listen to ARCADE FIRE and you'll see what music can do these days. Just as much as Queen's music did over 30 years ago. It's time to move on... |
Sweetie 27.04.2008 18:54 |
Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.You know that's a load of fucking shit, don't you? Queen can continue if they want, Freddie was only one member of Queen, Deaky may not want to come back, that's his choice but Brian and Roger have just rearranged the members, they're still Queen. |
Sweetie 27.04.2008 18:58 |
Treasure Moment wrote:AND<font color="sky blue">QueenMercury46 wrote: It's not gonna happen.shut up yourself you so called "fan" you dont understand Queen like i do because you arent a real fanTreasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.Oh shut up. Treasure Moment wrote:Wtf are you on TM?Pierre wrote:for fucks sake, Queen is NOT Queen without freddie, they are smile without him.Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.r! Hey TM for fuck sake Queen is Queen with Fred or Without... so shut up your only a fan dammit ! if you like Queen era 1971-1991 stick with it or be a bakotsträvare !! or listening to SMGON it the end... hur svårt kan det vara You really need to know that if everyone else doesn't understand something and you're the only one (This is in TM's mind anyway) then you're more than certainly wrong and they rest of the people are right. |
Mr Faron Hyte 27.04.2008 19:21 |
Arcade Fire are so 2006. |
Winter Land Man 27.04.2008 23:44 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Freddie is my favorite member. But with Freddie's decisions on song writing in the 80s, if Brian, Roger, and John weren't with him as a band in the 1980s, Freddie wouldn't of had much of a successful career during that decade. Particularly with the albums 'The Game', 'The Works', 'A Kind Of Magic', and 'The Miracle'.... albums which I enjoy more than 70s albums. The Game's biggest hit was a John Deacon track, 'Another One Bites The Dust'. The Works biggest single was 'Radio GaGa', by Roger. A Kind Of Magic's best selling song, was the self-titled track, again by Roger (Before you say "ohh but Freddie remixed A Kind Of Magic", I don't really care, because I prefer Roger's original version than Freddie's mixed version!), and The Miracle's biggest song was I Want It All, by Brian.Oberon wrote:yes you are right that he wasnt everything in Queen but he was the largest part. Of course i cant deny the awesome guitar playing of brian, johns memorable bass lines and roger has contributed alot too, they were the perfect team. Its because of that i dont like to see them playing under the Queen name now because its only 2 of the members and then a bunch of musicians who have nothing to do with queen. they had their time and they have their legacy, why ruin the name with this cover band? i understand that they want to play music but do it under another name because you arent fooling anyone.Treasure Moment wrote: Oberon, you are wrong about freddie. He would have become famous without the others. Yes i think they were the perfect team and i have alot of respect of roger, brian and john but we have to face the facts that freddie was on another level. Remember that freddie wrote bohemian rhapsody all by himself and its pretty much the biggest song in the world right? He could have performed that song with other musicians backing him up, also we are the champions. Lets not forget his INCREDIBLY vocals, charisma and frontman abilities. He would have made it with or without the others in the band, he was just super talented.I agree that Fred may well have become famous on his own or with others, but if you read my words I said he wouldn't have had as much success without them and I stand by that. Conversely, I don't think the others would have got anywhere near the level they did unless Fred had been there, so don't think I don't rate Fred. I just don't think he was EVERYTHING to do with Queen's success. As for John, it's a shame, but he's obviously not wanting to be involved in the music industry, so fair play to him for keeping quiet and letting B+R get on with it. Freddie's best selling singles of the 80s which he wrote alone were Crazy Little Thing Called Love (yes, it was a big hit, but not as big as AOBTD), Body Language, It's A Hard Life, Princes Of The Universe, and The Miracle. Ehhh. |
Winter Land Man 27.04.2008 23:57 |
Treasure Moment wrote:No, they aren't Smile either. What about Tim Staffel? (Sorry, can't spell his last name)Pierre wrote:for fucks sake, Queen is NOT Queen without freddie, they are smile without him.Treasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.r! Hey TM for fuck sake Queen is Queen with Fred or Without... so shut up your only a fan dammit ! if you like Queen era 1971-1991 stick with it or be a bakotsträvare !! or listening to SMGON it the end... hur svårt kan det vara |
Winter Land Man 27.04.2008 23:59 |
Treasure Moment wrote:That's your opinion, EVERYONE ELSE's opinion on this forum, except maybe for your band members, would disagree with you and say your music is SHIT compared to any other band's they've heard. I'd rather listen to Britney Spears than your keyboard driven garbage. That's the kind of shit that actually got Queen booed out of the USA, and they used half the keyboards you use. If you actually were actually placed in 'rock music', you'd be the Wayne Newton of rock 'n roll.write your letters in the sand wrote: Sadly, this won't happen. Early on, John recognized the massive talent that is Treasure Moment, and bowed out gracefully before Queen was put to shame by the sheer force of the virtuosity that is . . . Treasure Moment. Oh yeah.actually, our songs are waaay better than the stuff ive heard from the new "Queen" and thats not arrogance, its just a fact. If freddie was alive then it would be a whole another story though. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:00 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Anyone can hold a note down on a keyboard for 10 seconds and then do the same with another key. Britney Spears can play keyboard better than you can, and I bet she can get laid by more women than you could.olly1988 wrote: Treasured Moment: actually, our songs are waaay better than the stuff ive heard from the new "Queen" and thats not arrogance, its just a fact. If freddie was alive then it would be a whole another story though. ... Have you heard your stuff lately? Please Use what they call a click track next time your recording, your timing is awful. If you were anything like Queen you would have standards. theres a reason your music has had so little attention on myspace! linkthat song isnt even finished, it was just something my brother recorded quickly to record the idea, you listen to "nothing lasts" composition and tell me new "Queen"s material is up to same standard when it comes to instrumentation and complexity. Brian Wilson could play a 10 second song on an accordian which would be more complex than you could do with an 18 minute song. Go listen to Brian Wilson's 'Smile' and The Beach Boys 'Pet Sounds'. Those guys were great song writers and Freddie's 'Harmonies' were influenced by THEM, and they used more than Queen did in their lifetime. Say Thank You to Brian Wilson, as I consider HIM the God of song writing and playing instruments... far better than Freddie on piano. Brian could play any song perfectly after hearing it (without reading sheet music). With Freddie, it took him days to figure out how to play his own stuff on piano and he often forgot (and admitted to that). Brian can play basically any instrument and has thrown away more recordings than released. And he has some major mental disorders. He's God, and I have no doubt, when I go to Heaven, I'll arrive and see a strange figure playing in front of an audience, song called "Love And Mercy" on the piano, and the figure will turn around, and it'll be Brian Wilson. In the audience, will be Freddie Mercury. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:02 |
Treasure Moment wrote:He made A Kind Of Magic worse. I prefer the Highlander version of 'A Kind Of Magic'... rockier and better sounding. I love both, but the Highlander version is better. You can disagree with me if you like, but you would, because you hate guitar driven songs (that's what I think at least, when I listen to your shitty songs on your myspace)Jacob Britt wrote:sorry i didnt mean compose everything, i mean he was very ingaged in the songs of the other members too and rearranged them, just check what he did on its a kind of magic and one vision and that should give you an idea how involved he was in the other songs.Treasure Moment wrote: Freddie composed/rearranged everything they didWhat a load of crap. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:04 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Im just saying how it is, Queen isnt Queen without freddie, simple as that. The guy wasnt just a musician/singer you can replace. He was a legend! the best singer/frontman/musician of all time and wrote the biggest songs in the world and was the reason why Queen became famous in the first place. Queen would have NEVER gotten this big without freddie, thats a fact and its impossible to replace him. You can clearly see the quality of the material roger and brian are releasing compared to the early stuff with freddie, its not bad but compared to the stuff with freddie its B quality. just face the facts, Freddie was the heart and mind of Queen and although roger,brian and john are all very good and talented musicians freddie was just on a whole another level and despite what freddie himself said, he was their LEADER and THE reason why they became big in the first place.I think Freddie is the best vocalist of all time. Not the best musician though (Brian Wilson is!), Brian Wilson is much more complex, listen to Pet Sounds and Smile, and then talk to me about who's a better musician. Freddie didn't write the biggest songs in the world (as a Queen product). John Deacon wrote the best selling song Queen did. You are right, Queen wouldn't have been that big without Freddie, but I hate the way you use the phrase "and that's a fact!". That sounds like something an ass licker would say... "and that's a crack!" Freddie wasn't the leader of the group. JOHN DEACON WAS! That's what Freddie said at least. HURRAY FOR JOHN DEACON! |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:05 |
Treasure Moment wrote:You'll never make it in the music industry if you can't accept critisim!Another Roger (re) wrote: Treasure moment: The music you make are nothing special. You have to understand that music is subjective. I for one would never pay for your music. Its way below average for me. And you should learn to have more respect for others music. You will get nowhere with your attitude. I cant see your talent anyway.hah "way below average" haha you give me an example of your "Quality" and besides if you say you cant see our talent then you are just ignorant, blind and simply understand anything about quality music so your opinion doesnt meant anything to me. I respect music that deserves to be respected. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:06 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Oberon, you are wrong about freddie. He would have become famous without the others. Yes i think they were the perfect team and i have alot of respect of roger, brian and john but we have to face the facts that freddie was on another level. Remember that freddie wrote bohemian rhapsody all by himself and its pretty much the biggest song in the world right? He could have performed that song with other musicians backing him up, also we are the champions. Lets not forget his INCREDIBLY vocals, charisma and frontman abilities. He would have made it with or without the others in the band, he was just super talented.Let's not forget Brian Wilson's musical talent compared to Freddie's. Freddie had some great songs, but so did the other members of Queen. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:18 |
By the Way, Mr. Treasure Moment, I'm not a big fan of Queen + Paul Rodgers, but I actually do believe Freddie was a fan of Paul. Remember, Freddie sang blues before he sang rock music. Also, I enjoy listening to Queen + Paul Rodger's new songs... you should too, especially Say It's Not True which is basically influenced by Freddie to be honest. There's people in this world DYING of AIDS, in all countries around the world. I guarantee, Roger and Brian wouldn't donate and help out with charities and people dying of AIDS or helping put a stop to it, if Freddie hadn't died. I am very sure that Freddie is very happy that they are doing this. If you were in Heaven, and you died of AIDS, and your band recruited someone to play with them and write songs about finding a cure, wouldn't you think great things about them? I'm really fucking sick of your lame hatred against Paul Rodgers in the Queen section. Why don't you discuss it on a Paul Rodger's forum, or in the Queen + PR section? I don't get it. We've heard what you've said, now quit crying because what you are saying will NEVER make a difference and I guarantee Brian May could care less about what you say, and I could guarantee even more, he'll never hear about what you say. If you think you'll convince any of us, you're wrong. You sound perverted. You sound like one of those guys that would fuck Freddie, even if he was alive and did have AIDS still. You sound like you want to be him. You even called me gay, yet you're biggest idol is so girlish, it's rediculous. PS - if you don't think you can be banned from this site, just you wait, I've been banned from this site NUMEROUS times, and I bet you will be as well, within the next couple of months. You seem to be spamming this site with the same old god damn message of "I'm Mr. Treasure Moment, I am the next Freddie Mercury, to Hell with Paul Rodgers" crap. PPS - Have a nice night. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 00:27 |
OH YEAH, if you REALLY think your band is so great, Mr. Treasure Moment... ... then how about you create a poll on a website... and post an mp3 of your song, and an mp3 of a Cyndi Lauper or Paris Hilton song, and see which song is voted best. You can't change the opinion of the people!!! |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 02:59 |
<Font color=Puce>Deakys |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote:you sound like a silly teen who doesnt know much about Queen so your opinion doesnt mean anythingTreasure Moment wrote: john was reasonable and quit because he knew it would be no point to continue without freddie. Freddie was the heart of Queen and Queen died when he died.You know that's a load of fucking shit, don't you? Queen can continue if they want, Freddie was only one member of Queen, Deaky may not want to come back, that's his choice but Brian and Roger have just rearranged the members, they're still Queen. |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 03:04 |
Jacob, you calling my band shit takes away any credibility that you had, simple as that. You could never write 1 of the songs on that page, try to compose something like "nothing lasts" if you can show me, GOOD LUCK! :D |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 04:07 |
Treasure Moment wrote: Jacob, you calling my band shit takes away any credibility that you had, simple as that. You could never write 1 of the songs on that page, try to compose something like "nothing lasts" if you can show me, GOOD LUCK! :DAnd you could never write lyrics as good as I can. Simple as that. GOOD LUCK! |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 04:30 |
Jacob Britt wrote:we are talking about musical talent here not poetry.Treasure Moment wrote: Jacob, you calling my band shit takes away any credibility that you had, simple as that. You could never write 1 of the songs on that page, try to compose something like "nothing lasts" if you can show me, GOOD LUCK! :DAnd you could never write lyrics as good as I can. Simple as that. GOOD LUCK! |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 04:34 |
Jacob Britt wrote:we are talking about musical talent here not poetry, kid.Treasure Moment wrote: Jacob, you calling my band shit takes away any credibility that you had, simple as that. You could never write 1 of the songs on that page, try to compose something like "nothing lasts" if you can show me, GOOD LUCK! :DAnd you could never write lyrics as good as I can. Simple as that. GOOD LUCK! |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 04:44 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Here's what Freddie said "Whoever wrote the lyrics, wrote the song!"Jacob Britt wrote:we are talking about musical talent here not poetry, kid.Treasure Moment wrote: Jacob, you calling my band shit takes away any credibility that you had, simple as that. You could never write 1 of the songs on that page, try to compose something like "nothing lasts" if you can show me, GOOD LUCK! :DAnd you could never write lyrics as good as I can. Simple as that. GOOD LUCK! |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 04:46 |
Besides, I'm not here to judge my musical talent. And actually, I know I could write a better song than you. I don't have to prove it though, because that's not what I'm talking about. ------------ IF you REALLY "think" your band is !so great!, Mr. Treasure Moment... ... then how about you create a poll on a website... and post an mp3 of your song, and an mp3 of a Cyndi Lauper or Paris Hilton song, and see which song is voted best??????? You can't change the opinion of the people!!! |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 05:09 |
Jacob Britt wrote: Besides, I'm not here to judge my musical talent. And actually, I know I could write a better song than you. I don't have to prove it though, because that's not what I'm talking about. ------------ IF you REALLY "think" your band is !so great!, Mr. Treasure Moment... ... then how about you create a poll on a website... and post an mp3 of your song, and an mp3 of a Cyndi Lauper or Paris Hilton song, and see which song is voted best??????? You can't change the opinion of the people!!!hahaha silly kid, you are funny :) |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 05:14 |
I'm being serious. Are you too much of a pussy to do so? |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 05:14 |
Enable commenting on your songs on myspace, so we can see what people really think of your shit. You'd probably delete any comments that would somehow ruin your reputation. |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 05:45 |
Jacob Britt wrote: Enable commenting on your songs on myspace, so we can see what people really think of your shit. You'd probably delete any comments that would somehow ruin your reputation.havent you read the comments from the queen fans on the page? of course if i would enable you to write something there you would write bad stuff because you are stupid and dont know anything about music. Same goes for the poll here since the majority of the people here are stupid 15 year olds. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 14:37 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I was once on your myspace list and I tried to leave a comment of what I thought of your music and you didn't approve, so I deleted you.Jacob Britt wrote: Enable commenting on your songs on myspace, so we can see what people really think of your shit. You'd probably delete any comments that would somehow ruin your reputation.havent you read the comments from the queen fans on the page? of course if i would enable you to write something there you would write bad stuff because you are stupid and dont know anything about music. Same goes for the poll here since the majority of the people here are stupid 15 year olds. |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 16:20 |
Jacob Britt wrote:i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualTreasure Moment wrote:I was once on your myspace list and I tried to leave a comment of what I thought of your music and you didn't approve, so I deleted you.Jacob Britt wrote: Enable commenting on your songs on myspace, so we can see what people really think of your shit. You'd probably delete any comments that would somehow ruin your reputation.havent you read the comments from the queen fans on the page? of course if i would enable you to write something there you would write bad stuff because you are stupid and dont know anything about music. Same goes for the poll here since the majority of the people here are stupid 15 year olds. |
Mr Faron Hyte 28.04.2008 17:00 |
Treasure Moment wrote: i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualso if its negative its therefore unfair. brilliant. |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 17:23 |
Mr Faron Hyte wrote:yeah and thats a fact, nobody can say that the music on the site sucks, if they do they know shit about music :)Treasure Moment wrote: i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualso if its negative its therefore unfair. brilliant. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 18:11 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I'm a Queen fan, I must know shit about music.Mr Faron Hyte wrote:yeah and thats a fact, nobody can say that the music on the site sucks, if they do they know shit about music :)Treasure Moment wrote: i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualso if its negative its therefore unfair. brilliant. |
Treasure Moment 28.04.2008 18:34 |
Jacob Britt wrote:basically EVERYONE out there are Queen fans, its not often i meet someone who doesnt like at least 1 or 2 songs by queenTreasure Moment wrote:I'm a Queen fan, I must know shit about music.Mr Faron Hyte wrote:yeah and thats a fact, nobody can say that the music on the site sucks, if they do they know shit about music :)Treasure Moment wrote: i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualso if its negative its therefore unfair. brilliant. |
Winter Land Man 28.04.2008 20:18 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Yes, but I'm a big Queen fan. I've got all of their studio albums (live albums and a ton of their compilations, including the hard to get 1989 promo compilation 'Classic Queen'), a ton of Queen singles and promo singles (CD/7"/12"/Cassette), all of Freddie's solo albums (including the remixes and compilations), and a lot of Freddie singles and promo singles (CD/7"/12").Jacob Britt wrote:basically EVERYONE out there are Queen fans, its not often i meet someone who doesnt like at least 1 or 2 songs by queenTreasure Moment wrote:I'm a Queen fan, I must know shit about music.Mr Faron Hyte wrote:yeah and thats a fact, nobody can say that the music on the site sucks, if they do they know shit about music :)Treasure Moment wrote: i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualso if its negative its therefore unfair. brilliant. |
Treasure Moment 29.04.2008 05:45 |
Jacob Britt wrote:thats good!Treasure Moment wrote:Yes, but I'm a big Queen fan. I've got all of their studio albums (live albums and a ton of their compilations, including the hard to get 1989 promo compilation 'Classic Queen'), a ton of Queen singles and promo singles (CD/7"/12"/Cassette), all of Freddie's solo albums (including the remixes and compilations), and a lot of Freddie singles and promo singles (CD/7"/12").Jacob Britt wrote:basically EVERYONE out there are Queen fans, its not often i meet someone who doesnt like at least 1 or 2 songs by queenTreasure Moment wrote:I'm a Queen fan, I must know shit about music.Mr Faron Hyte wrote:yeah and thats a fact, nobody can say that the music on the site sucks, if they do they know shit about music :)Treasure Moment wrote: i dont log in often there but whatever comment you were going to leave most likely was negative and unfair as usualso if its negative its therefore unfair. brilliant. |
The Real Wizard 29.04.2008 12:11 |
Treasure Moment wrote: I respect music that deserves to be respected.That's rich coming from someone who doesn't know what the Real Book is, isn't familiar with Stevie Wonder's 70s output, and thinks his band's music is better than The Beatles and Mozart. Jacob Britt wrote: Go listen to Brian Wilson's 'Smile' and The Beach Boys 'Pet Sounds'. Those guys were great song writers and Freddie's 'Harmonies' were influenced by THEM, and they used more than Queen did in their lifetime. Say Thank You to Brian WilsonAmen. |