QueenZone discussion #1093779

galashiels wrote: kiss his shoe lol.two diffrent singers,two diffrent styles,both gods in music.i think kiss his shoes is a bit much.

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: kiss his shoe lol.two diffrent singers,two diffrent styles,both gods in music.i think kiss his shoes is a bit much.

Not really, she is nothing compared to him and it isnt really 2 different styles as freddie could sing any style better than anyone, FACT :)

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

Mr Faron Hyte wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

Its a shame he was cremated, otherwise you could have dug him up and fucked him.

galashiels wrote: so logicaly in your mind.the queen of soul is only good for licking shoes.how old are you.do you even know who aretha franklin is.might as well say the spice girls are better than the supremes,or the beatles were semi famous for 5 mins.or what about the bay city rollers are better then led zep.in my mind there are three types of queen fans.people who like queen.people who love queen.and people who are obbsed by queen.i feel you fall in to the third section.try listening to more music my friend,there are better singers than fred,but many worse.

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so logicaly in your mind.the queen of soul is only good for licking shoes.how old are you.do you even know who aretha franklin is.might as well say the spice girls are better than the supremes,or the beatles were semi famous for 5 mins.or what about the bay city rollers are better then led zep.in my mind there are three types of queen fans.people who like queen.people who love queen.and people who are obbsed by queen.i feel you fall in to the third section.try listening to more music my friend,there are better singers than fred,but many worse.

"there are better singers than fred" you just lost ALL credibility there!!!!! there isnt ANYONE who is better and i repeat ANYONE who is even CLOSE to freddies godly voice and range and pure feeling and power!! how old are you? because you dont seem too bright? 15 years old? *sarcasm* ive heard aretha and as i said she is just good enough to kiss freddies shoes as he is on a totally different league, about 1 million times better in every way.

Micrówave wrote: Have you all seen Aretha's new shoes? Well, neither has she. (I thank you)

Treasure Moment wrote:

Mr Faron Hyte wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

Its a shame he was cremated, otherwise you could have dug him up and fucked him.

not really since im straight, im just saying how things are, its called logical thinking :)

<font color="sky blue">QueenMercury46 wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so logicaly in your mind.the queen of soul is only good for licking shoes.how old are you.do you even know who aretha franklin is.might as well say the spice girls are better than the supremes,or the beatles were semi famous for 5 mins.or what about the bay city rollers are better then led zep.in my mind there are three types of queen fans.people who like queen.people who love queen.and people who are obbsed by queen.i feel you fall in to the third section.try listening to more music my friend,there are better singers than fred,but many worse.

"there are better singers than fred" you just lost ALL credibility there!!!!! there isnt ANYONE who is better and i repeat ANYONE who is even CLOSE to freddies godly voice and range and pure feeling and power!! how old are you? because you dont seem too bright? 15 years old? *sarcasm* ive heard aretha and as i said she is just good enough to kiss freddies shoes as he is on a totally different league, about 1 million times better in every way.

Because Treasure Moment knows every singer on the face of this earth and is the one and only expert on music EVER and that is a FACT.

Treasure Moment wrote: ive heard aretha and as i said she is just good enough to kiss freddies shoes as he is on a totally different league, about 1 million times better in every way.

Mr Faron Hyte wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote: ive heard aretha and as i said she is just good enough to kiss freddies shoes as he is on a totally different league, about 1 million times better in every way.

Okay, well here's one way she's a million times better than Freddie - she's not dead. How about that, shortpants?

Mr Faron Hyte wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

Mr Faron Hyte wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

Its a shame he was cremated, otherwise you could have dug him up and fucked him.

not really since im straight, im just saying how things are, its called logical thinking :)

Seriously though its amazing that you can even talk with his dick in your mouth all the time.

LozlanTheMage wrote: TM - I would appreciate it if you would stop derailing innocent threads with the same tired non-arguments. -Sincerely, Lozlan

Treasure Moment wrote:

LozlanTheMage wrote: TM - I would appreciate it if you would stop derailing innocent threads with the same tired non-arguments. -Sincerely, Lozlan

Alright, sorry. I should have said first that they didnt meet and then what i thought about the collaboration. Its not my fault that people keep wanting to talk about what feel on that subject.

Zebonka12 wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

LozlanTheMage wrote: TM - I would appreciate it if you would stop derailing innocent threads with the same tired non-arguments. -Sincerely, Lozlan

Alright, sorry. I should have said first that they didnt meet and then what i thought about the collaboration. Its not my fault that people keep wanting to talk about what feel on that subject.

Don't apologise for being a stupid cunt. We forgive you. Freddie is your favourite singer. Repeat after me, "Freddie is my favourite singer". You will never convince an objective thinker that he is 'the best' because that title does not exist. There were louder singers than Freddie, there were singers who could go higher (and lower). There were singers who could sing those notes cleaner, and singers who could do it a lot rougher. Again; if he has been 'topped' in those areas, how exactly are you to convince anyone that he's the 'best'? He's basically my favourite singer too, you know, but if you're a logical thinker as you claim to be, you'll understand that it really is only a matter of opinion. You just can't accept him for what he was; unique, talented and brilliant. Nope; you have to shit on every singer that gets mentioned on Queenzone because you're a knob-end. The world would be a boring fucking place if all we had on the radio was Queen and Treasure Moment. I'm glad you are mortal.

Treasure Moment wrote:

hahah..man...sure there are other good singer but they really cant compare and its not an opinion.

How the *fuck* can you ever back up a statement like that?
There are singers with more range, more durability in a live situation, more roughness or more smoothness.... singers with different (sometimes superior) qualities in MEASURABLE areas when compared to Freddie Mercury.
It *really* comes down to what you prefer. That's what we call an opinion. Why the fuck don't you go look in a dictionary sometime?

Treasure Moment wrote: No i dont but just for fun you tell me 1 singer who is better than freddie so i can laugh in your face..go ahead! :)

Champipple wrote: I'm sick of every thread becoming a "Treasure Moment versus the world" topic. It's now official. In my books anyone who argues with Treasure Moment is equally as annoying and ignorant.

Champipple wrote: I'm sick of every thread becoming a "Treasure Moment versus the world" topic. It's now official. In my books anyone who argues with Treasure Moment is equally as annoying and ignorant.

Zebonka12 wrote: "FACT", right?

Micrówave wrote: Have you all seen Aretha's new shoes? Well, neither has she. (I thank you)

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so logicaly in your mind.the queen of soul is only good for licking shoes.how old are you.do you even know who aretha franklin is.might as well say the spice girls are better than the supremes,or the beatles were semi famous for 5 mins.or what about the bay city rollers are better then led zep.in my mind there are three types of queen fans.people who like queen.people who love queen.and people who are obbsed by queen.i feel you fall in to the third section.try listening to more music my friend,there are better singers than fred,but many worse.

"there are better singers than fred" you just lost ALL credibility there!!!!! there isnt ANYONE who is better and i repeat ANYONE who is even CLOSE to freddies godly voice and range and pure feeling and power!! how old are you? because you dont seem too bright? 15 years old? *sarcasm* ive heard aretha and as i said she is just good enough to kiss freddies shoes as he is on a totally different league, about 1 million times better in every way.

Dusta wrote: TM, I think folks are just responding to your...passion for Freddie, which sometimes makes you sound a little...over the top. As I've said before, I share your admiration for Freddie, and, Queen...however, there are other musicians out there with real talent. There was a reason Freddie loved Aretha Franklin. Given he was such a fine musician, himself, wouldn't it be logical to deduce that he had a very good reason for admiring her?

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so logicaly in your mind.the queen of soul is only good for licking shoes.how old are you.do you even know who aretha franklin is.might as well say the spice girls are better than the supremes,or the beatles were semi famous for 5 mins.or what about the bay city rollers are better then led zep.in my mind there are three types of queen fans.people who like queen.people who love queen.and people who are obbsed by queen.i feel you fall in to the third section.try listening to more music my friend,there are better singers than fred,but many worse.

"there are better singers than fred" you just lost ALL credibility there!!!!! there isnt ANYONE who is better and i repeat ANYONE who is even CLOSE to freddies godly voice and range and pure feeling and power!! how old are you? because you dont seem too bright? 15 years old? *sarcasm* ive heard aretha and as i said she is just good enough to kiss freddies shoes as he is on a totally different league, about 1 million times better in every way.

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

Leaky Luke wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

For someone who is making music, You have really have no musical intelligence.

Leaky Luke wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

For someone who is making music, You have really have no musical intelligence.

Cwazy little thing wrote:

Leaky Luke wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

For someone who is making music, You have really have no musical intelligence.

Saying that shows how deep in denial you are :) Is it really music though? :S

Cwazy little thing wrote:

Leaky Luke wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

For someone who is making music, You have really have no musical intelligence.

Is it really music though? :S

Treasure Moment wrote:

Cwazy little thing wrote:

Leaky Luke wrote:

Treasure Moment wrote:

galashiels wrote: so someone who is nothing can amass,20 number 1 r&b singles,20 grammy awards,50 albums.and tens of millionss of record sales.

she is something yes BUT nothing compared to freddie

For someone who is making music, You have really have no musical intelligence.

Is it really music though? :S

Saying that shows how deep in denial you are. Its like saying that the earth isnt round.

Iamnotmarilynmonroe wrote: Dude, seriously! Even Freddie knew that aretha was better than him. He wanted to be like her! 1.Aretha 2.Freddie 3. Other dudes Aretha is better but just for a little, little, little bit. And you dont know perhaps theres another dude outthere that nobody knows thats better than him and her, Who knows?!