una999 24.03.2008 17:47 |
Isn't it funny how you always hear john roger and brian talk about how great freddie was, but you never hear freddie talk about how good the others were...just shows everyone wants to hear about freddie. Also was just thinking how lucky freddie was. Saw a picture of him at an airport with him getting off the plane and a limo waiting for him...that's the life, he had it and now it's gone. Fuck did he realise just how lucky he was. Even if i was brian may i wouldn't feel half the star that freddie was. Just such an interesting person, everything about him. There has to be a film made about him...sad thing is that people like johnny cash and elvis seem to be more popular yet they hadn't half the talent or charisma as freddie. He was very photogenic, but wud he have looked as good if he had his mouth open in them all...see everyone has a bad point! Just think he was at the right time to be a rock star...something sexier about being a rock star in the 70's than say the 00's |
...assdude.... 39702 24.03.2008 18:28 |
yeah But the rest the boys didnt really talk up frieddie when he was alive either... |
Jazz 78 25.03.2008 10:21 |
No need to talk of how good Brian, Roger and John were/are. The music does it for them! |
john bodega 25.03.2008 11:37 |
Have you ever started a thread that wasn't as worthless as a warm pile of sailors cum? |
Micrówave 25.03.2008 12:57 |
una999 wrote: sad thing is that people like johnny cash and elvis seem to be more popular yet they hadn't half the talent or charisma as freddie.Slow down there, Uni-ball. On our planet, Earth, Elvis was just about as big as there has ever been. Freddie was great, but he was no Elvis. You speak of Charisma. Elvis was the epitomy of Charisma. Even bloated Elvis could still pull 'em in. Young and old, they ALL wanted Elvis. And if you're even suggesting that Logan Place could pull in the same crowds as Graceland does yearly, you're completly off you're rocker. Why not actually listen to what Elvis or Johnny did before making a unfounded and unsubstantiated claim? And don't say you have. If you had, you would have never posted this. |
Mr Faron Hyte 25.03.2008 14:50 |
una999 wrote: Isn't it funny how you always hear john roger and brian talk about how great freddie was, but you never hear freddie talk about how good the others were...just shows everyone wants to hear about freddie.*cue the psycho Freddie fan music* Of course everyone talks about Freddie now - he's dead! No one speaks ill of the dead and of course everyone's going to talk about how wonderful he was and what an overwhelming contribution he made. He's dead! And people always say good things about people after they're gone! For people who only know Queen since Freddie's death and think he was always universally revered and acclaimed, go back and read reviews of the band and their work from back in the day - from the 70s and 80s. A lot of it was elss than glowing and a lot of it was aimed squarely at Mister Mercury. Freddie Mercury was a great talent and his work and reputation stand for themselves. His memory certainly doesn't need you trying to build him up into some kind of cartoonish superman that he wasn't. |
Jazz 78 25.03.2008 16:30 |
I concur! Point very well taken. I grew up with Queen in the 70's and remember any review dealing with the band usually being negative. And Freddie was always a target. People that have become fans after his death really don't grasp the things that were written about them back then. But then again the fans are what put them at the top by buying the music. The critics got those records they were to review for free. |
dawson2 26.03.2008 17:31 |
I don't think you can say who was the best, as they all have their great characteristics. I think it would be boring if just one person could have the best place. I think Freddie is in with the best entertainers. Nobody will ever forget Live Aid in London, the best rock concert ever in the history of the world and the Queen performance was one of the best. As much as I admire the other members of Queen and their talent, I can't imagine they would be 1/4 as good without Freddie as the front man. I'm ignorant as I've never seen Queen without Freddie and I'm always in two minds if they should carry on with the same name without him. I know they put as much into Queen with their song writing and musical talent, but Freddie had the magic. I've never seen anybody else perform the same music and make it as special. Freddie was always very modest though and always said he wasn't the leader as they were all equal. I can always pick up that Roger Taylor was his longest friend, as he has a bit of magic about him too. Brian is a great guitarist and I have to say I'm ignorant about guitar players but he comes across as a bit nerdy to me. Maybe that's special about them, as they don't fit a mould and I shouldn't be judgemental. |
dawson2 26.03.2008 20:57 |
I was born in 1970 so sort of missed their very early stuff and Freddie had a solo career in the 1980s with great songs. When I was about 14 I saw I was born to love you, on TOTP and loved it, so I was a fan from then. Then I saw them on Live Aid in London the whole concert was an experience with so many great performers, but when Queen come on it was magic as Freddie had all those people in the palm of his hand. I bought the box set of Queen and the third disk had some things made after Freddie died and I liked it. I liked Brians song for the Ford advert. I don't really remember anything bad written about them as they seemed to be popular to me. I don't think it would be right to say who was the best performer in the world, as it would be boring if there just had to be one but as far as I'm concerned Freddie is a legend who will always be remembered. They will be one of the great classics from our age. |
Joeker 26.03.2008 21:12 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Have you ever started a thread that wasn't as worthless as a warm pile of sailors cum?actually sailors cum is used as a field source for some third world countries. There is quiet a market for it nowadays. |
john bodega 26.03.2008 22:49 |
You mean 'field sauce', right? |
Treasure Moment 26.03.2008 23:26 |
Micrówave wrote:WOW! you are ignorant arent you? freddie was no elvis?!?!?una999 wrote: sad thing is that people like johnny cash and elvis seem to be more popular yet they hadn't half the talent or charisma as freddie.Slow down there, Uni-ball. On our planet, Earth, Elvis was just about as big as there has ever been. Freddie was great, but he was no Elvis. You speak of Charisma. Elvis was the epitomy of Charisma. Even bloated Elvis could still pull 'em in. Young and old, they ALL wanted Elvis. And if you're even suggesting that Logan Place could pull in the same crowds as Graceland does yearly, you're completly off you're rocker. Why not actually listen to what Elvis or Johnny did before making a unfounded and unsubstantiated claim? And don't say you have. If you had, you would have never posted this. its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you? also elvis could never in his life write a song like bohemian rhapsody or sing like freddie, he is absolute NOBODY compared to freddie but stupid people cant understand that. Same with johnny cash. No one comes close to freddie, he is just on a super human level. |
Treasure Moment 26.03.2008 23:28 |
Jazz 78 wrote: I concur! Point very well taken. I grew up with Queen in the 70's and remember any review dealing with the band usually being negative. And Freddie was always a target. People that have become fans after his death really don't grasp the things that were written about them back then. But then again the fans are what put them at the top by buying the music. The critics got those records they were to review for free.FUCK those stupid retards who wrote the reviews, who the fuck are they to judge the god of music? they are his urine those worthless garbage humans. |
...assdude.... 39702 26.03.2008 23:39 |
Treasure Moment wrote:and as for charimsa.... Freddie had more, as it made up for its ugly looks... eheh Elvis was Like OMG, so good looking... Freddie had more character..Micrówave wrote:WOW! you are ignorant arent you? freddie was no elvis?!?!? its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you? also elvis could never in his life write a song like bohemian rhapsody or sing like freddie, he is absolute NOBODY compared to freddie but stupid people cant understand that. Same with johnny cash. No one comes close to freddie, he is just on a super human level.una999 wrote: sad thing is that people like johnny cash and elvis seem to be more popular yet they hadn't half the talent or charisma as freddie.Slow down there, Uni-ball. On our planet, Earth, Elvis was just about as big as there has ever been. Freddie was great, but he was no Elvis. You speak of Charisma. Elvis was the epitomy of Charisma. Even bloated Elvis could still pull 'em in. Young and old, they ALL wanted Elvis. And if you're even suggesting that Logan Place could pull in the same crowds as Graceland does yearly, you're completly off you're rocker. Why not actually listen to what Elvis or Johnny did before making a unfounded and unsubstantiated claim? And don't say you have. If you had, you would have never posted this. |
Poo, again 27.03.2008 06:58 |
Treasure Moment wrote:They're talking about charisma.Micrówave wrote:WOW! you are ignorant arent you? freddie was no elvis?!?!? its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you? also elvis could never in his life write a song like bohemian rhapsody or sing like freddie, he is absolute NOBODY compared to freddie but stupid people cant understand that. Same with johnny cash. No one comes close to freddie, he is just on a super human level.una999 wrote: sad thing is that people like johnny cash and elvis seem to be more popular yet they hadn't half the talent or charisma as freddie.Slow down there, Uni-ball. On our planet, Earth, Elvis was just about as big as there has ever been. Freddie was great, but he was no Elvis. You speak of Charisma. Elvis was the epitomy of Charisma. Even bloated Elvis could still pull 'em in. Young and old, they ALL wanted Elvis. And if you're even suggesting that Logan Place could pull in the same crowds as Graceland does yearly, you're completly off you're rocker. Why not actually listen to what Elvis or Johnny did before making a unfounded and unsubstantiated claim? And don't say you have. If you had, you would have never posted this. Retard. Sheep. Cattle. Barbara Bush. |
dawson2 27.03.2008 08:42 |
Why are we comparing Freddie with Elvis just because one person felt the need to compare? Elvis was good looking as some kind of teenage icon. You know the type that teenage girls with raging hormones have a crush on before they get a real boyfriend, and later on he sang more sophisticated songs, but it's in another league than Queen with Freddie, as they're like the Mozart of their day with their talent. I don't have anything against Elvis as he is in with the best, so why does that person feel one person has to fit into a top category? It would be a boring world if everybody was the same. |
dawson2 27.03.2008 08:58 |
I don't remember anybody taking any notice of music critics. They're just people who couldn't do it themselves so they need to make money writing about people who can. As far as I can remember, on the whole people have mostly said nice things about Queen. I don't think Queen have ever been in the 'Take That' type category where the fans have been mostly teenage girls with a crush. Their music has always fitted into the tastes of more sophisticated people. If I had to pinpoint times when Queen have been the most popular with the teenybopper type fans, it was when they first started with their glam rock type look, then late 70s and early 80s with punk and new romantics they died down a bit, then mid 80s they had a revival with their live performances and their songs such as Radio Ga Ga; We will Rock You; We are the Champions, were being played everywhere. Now we can look back and see it as a whole. |
dawson2 27.03.2008 09:22 |
I was about 15 for the Live Aid performance and Freddie was like some kind of supergod as everybody was talking about his performance. I mean it was a magical day as a whole with great performers such as Duran Duran, Elton, Eurythmics, Bryan Ferry with Pink Floyd, Ultravox, Spandau Ballet, Mick Jagger, Phill Collins, Sting, U2, to name just a few but I don't know anybody who didn't say Queen was the best on that day. I think that USA musical stars are the most popular as they have the biggest promoters and image makers who try to sell as much as quickly as possible to make as much money as quickly as possible, but I don't think they make as good quality music that lasts the test of time as British music or even Irish, Swedish and Australian. |
Micrówave 27.03.2008 12:49 |
Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
Treasure Moment 27.03.2008 12:52 |
Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
Poo, again 27.03.2008 13:17 |
Treasure Moment wrote:You must be severely dysfunctional in the real world.Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
andreas_mercury 27.03.2008 13:50 |
thats the reason we fired his ass |
Poo, again 27.03.2008 13:54 |
andreas_mercury wrote: thats the reason we fired his assTrust me, you're not much better than him. |
dawson2 27.03.2008 13:55 |
It shows how stupid you must be to think that somebody's teeth matters to how talented they are. Freddie was more of an individual anyway and that makes him more interesting. Most style in the UK is very individual and we're not into falseness. I'm glad he wasn't forced into getting false teeth. I think it's quite dumb to compare them and say who's the best when they're both good but in different ways. Like I said, it would be boring if only one person who fits a category can be called the best. |
dawson2 27.03.2008 14:01 |
Do you always make stupid comments in real life Microwave? Why does his estate matter anyway? Do you not even realise the cost of land in London compared to the middle of the USA? From what you say I wouldn't take what you say into consideration as to what talent it. A lot of money is made from rubbish being sold to as many idiots as possible, so I don't think money should matter. What's it to you what his lovers were like? Maybe they were nice people who he cared about and didn't care what other people thought? You sound like the kind of person who lives their life by celeb magazines and like people just because you spend your money on them to help them get rich and middle aged magazine executives tell you what's cool. I'll just take it that you're quite young and don't realise these things. |
dawson2 27.03.2008 14:40 |
I can't believe some of the things I have read. This is what our society is turning into. People who think anybody with money is better than those with less money. It's as if they're saying that wags and criminals are better than those who give money to charity or who help others for nothing. I'd hate it if he met god and god turned out to not have perfect teeth or not have a massive house in the backwoods. |
Poo, again 27.03.2008 17:58 |
^ This is Queenzone. You don't fit in. |
john bodega 28.03.2008 00:12 |
dawson2 wrote: I'd hate it if he met god and god turned out to not have perfect teeth or not have a massive house in the backwoods.I'm going to remember this at the Pearly Gates. |
Treasure Moment 28.03.2008 01:49 |
<font color=pink>Poo wrote:No, im just severly logical and im not dumb like the majority of stupid mindless sheep out there, like you and microwave.Treasure Moment wrote:You must be severely dysfunctional in the real world.Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
Treasure Moment 28.03.2008 01:53 |
<font color=pink>Poo wrote: ^ This is Queenzone. You don't fit in.he is right, you are not as dumb and ignorant as Poo or microwave, you can actually USE your mind and think logically which is something they cant. |
Treasure Moment 28.03.2008 01:54 |
dawson2 wrote: I can't believe some of the things I have read. This is what our society is turning into. People who think anybody with money is better than those with less money. It's as if they're saying that wags and criminals are better than those who give money to charity or who help others for nothing. I'd hate it if he met god and god turned out to not have perfect teeth or not have a massive house in the backwoods.I agree with you, some of the people here are THE dumbest people ive EVER talked to. Dont pay attention to them as their minds arent working. They cant think properly. |
LozlanTheMage 28.03.2008 12:11 |
AND THATS A FACT!&!)(@)($&)$y)o$*^)*%) Thanks for dancing for us, TM. You're a one-man black hole with a keyboard. By the by, the government is using galactic background radiation to harness the gravity of the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. They then use this gravity to make everyone fat and lazy. That's a FACT. ...well, not yet. I haven't quite finished my Youtube video. Stay tuned. |
Treasure Moment 28.03.2008 16:28 |
LozlanTheMage wrote: AND THATS A FACT!&!)(@)($&)$y)o$*^)*%) Thanks for dancing for us, TM. You're a one-man black hole with a keyboard. By the by, the government is using galactic background radiation to harness the gravity of the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. They then use this gravity to make everyone fat and lazy. That's a FACT. ...well, not yet. I haven't quite finished my Youtube video. Stay tuned.Silent you fool, your brain doesnt function well. |
Lester Burnham 28.03.2008 17:33 |
Treasure Moment wrote: My brain doesnt function well.And that's a FACT. |
Micrówave 28.03.2008 18:00 |
dawson2 wrote: I can't believe some of the things I have read. This is what our society is turning into. People who think anybody with money is better than those with less money. It's as if they're saying that wags and criminals are better than those who give money to charity or who help others for nothing. I'd hate it if he met god and god turned out to not have perfect teeth or not have a massive house in the backwoods.Look dipshit. People with money ARE better than people without. I don't want to hang out with a bunch of poor people... but you go ahead. I'm actually going to the Symphony tonight at the Myerson. Tickets? $51 a pop. Taking my daughter and two of her friends. Beats the hell out of the $1 theatre... but you enjoy. Also remember, poor people can't afford Queen tickets. Plus, you go ahead and hang out with people with bad teeth. I guess that's a sore spot in England, because we actually have dentists here in America, not drywall installers which you apparently use. (Damn, I'm rolling) And yes, it matters who you "do". Maybe that's why ol' "Hollywood" Mercury never got into that circle, like Roger did. I have given 10 perfect examples of how Elvis is better and all you and your new band mate (see how I tied that together?) is write stupid retorts. How bout: (1) actually addressing one of the points (2) actually listen to Elvis. (3) get a life I'm sure once you do that, things may become clearer, but until then do us all a favor. Take a vacation up your own arse. Bon Voyage! Micrówave (get the accent right!) |
Sweetie 28.03.2008 18:49 |
Treasure Moment wrote:You really have absolutely NO idea of what you're going on about, do you TM?Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
Sweetie 28.03.2008 18:52 |
Lester Burnham wrote:XDTreasure Moment wrote: My brain doesnt function well.And that's a FACT. XD |
Treasure Moment 28.03.2008 19:27 |
<Font color=Puce>Sweetie |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote:Actually it seems like im the ONLY one who has an idea as the rest of these peoples intelligence is like a monekeysTreasure Moment wrote:You really have absolutely NO idea of what you're going on about, do you TM?Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
Treasure Moment 28.03.2008 19:30 |
Micrówave wrote:wow! what a utter piece of shit so called human being you are! you materialistic ignorant stupid fuck! people like you arent worth anything. Money doesnt make someone a good person you idiot low intelligence being!dawson2 wrote: I can't believe some of the things I have read. This is what our society is turning into. People who think anybody with money is better than those with less money. It's as if they're saying that wags and criminals are better than those who give money to charity or who help others for nothing. I'd hate it if he met god and god turned out to not have perfect teeth or not have a massive house in the backwoods.Look dipshit. People with money ARE better than people without. I don't want to hang out with a bunch of poor people... but you go ahead. I'm actually going to the Symphony tonight at the Myerson. Tickets? $51 a pop. Taking my daughter and two of her friends. Beats the hell out of the $1 theatre... but you enjoy. Also remember, poor people can't afford Queen tickets. Plus, you go ahead and hang out with people with bad teeth. I guess that's a sore spot in England, because we actually have dentists here in America, not drywall installers which you apparently use. (Damn, I'm rolling) And yes, it matters who you "do". Maybe that's why ol' "Hollywood" Mercury never got into that circle, like Roger did. I have given 10 perfect examples of how Elvis is better and all you and your new band mate (see how I tied that together?) is write stupid retorts. How bout: (1) actually addressing one of the points (2) actually listen to Elvis. (3) get a life I'm sure once you do that, things may become clearer, but until then do us all a favor. Take a vacation up your own arse. Bon Voyage! Micrówave (get the accent right!) A good person is a good person no matter if he/she is homeless or has 100 million while a bad person can have 1 trillion dollars and he/she is still a bad worthless person. You really are a stupid idiot and that is a FACT. |
LozlanTheMage 28.03.2008 21:38 |
Treasure Moment wrote:'Silent you fool'? Sorry. That declaration only works if you are starring in a grainy black-and-white western epic. You also require a top hate, cape and Daliesque mustache to twirl at will.LozlanTheMage wrote: AND THATS A FACT!&!)(@)($&)$y)o$*^)*%) Thanks for dancing for us, TM. You're a one-man black hole with a keyboard. By the by, the government is using galactic background radiation to harness the gravity of the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. They then use this gravity to make everyone fat and lazy. That's a FACT. ...well, not yet. I haven't quite finished my Youtube video. Stay tuned.Silent you fool, your brain doesnt function well. You are an absolute imbecile. A tool, a moron, a braindead waste of humanity. I can almost convince myself that you are a prolonged gag, or an infuriating form of modern performance art. You may also be a half-assed text generator - as far as I can tell you regurgitate the same twenty-seven words in random sequences. The only true indications of your sentience are the occasional youtube videos you post, which confirm that yes, indeed, you are human. Albeit a delusional, arrogant and (in all likelihood) mentally ill human. Go put on your tinfoil hat. Richard Nixon's zombie has been secretly resurrected by the Masons and is coming to your house tonight. And that's a FACT. (Although I agree with you about Microwave. But hey, even a stopped clock is right twice a day, eh?) |
Sweetie 28.03.2008 22:32 |
Treasure Moment wrote:Somehow I think you've got it around the wrong way...<Font color=Puce>Sweetie |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote:Actually it seems like im the ONLY one who has an idea as the rest of these peoples intelligence is like a monekeysTreasure Moment wrote:You really have absolutely NO idea of what you're going on about, do you TM?Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. And what's a monekey? =P |
Treasure Moment 29.03.2008 00:37 |
LozlanTheMage wrote:You cant prove the things i say wrong. Its real and its happening but you are just blind to see it.Treasure Moment wrote:'Silent you fool'? Sorry. That declaration only works if you are starring in a grainy black-and-white western epic. You also require a top hate, cape and Daliesque mustache to twirl at will. You are an absolute imbecile. A tool, a moron, a braindead waste of humanity. I can almost convince myself that you are a prolonged gag, or an infuriating form of modern performance art. You may also be a half-assed text generator - as far as I can tell you regurgitate the same twenty-seven words in random sequences. The only true indications of your sentience are the occasional youtube videos you post, which confirm that yes, indeed, you are human. Albeit a delusional, arrogant and (in all likelihood) mentally ill human. Go put on your tinfoil hat. Richard Nixon's zombie has been secretly resurrected by the Masons and is coming to your house tonight. And that's a FACT. (Although I agree with you about Microwave. But hey, even a stopped clock is right twice a day, eh?)LozlanTheMage wrote: AND THATS A FACT!&!)(@)($&)$y)o$*^)*%) Thanks for dancing for us, TM. You're a one-man black hole with a keyboard. By the by, the government is using galactic background radiation to harness the gravity of the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. They then use this gravity to make everyone fat and lazy. That's a FACT. ...well, not yet. I haven't quite finished my Youtube video. Stay tuned.Silent you fool, your brain doesnt function well. |
Treasure Moment 29.03.2008 01:38 |
<Font color=Puce>Deakys |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote:I meant a monkeyTreasure Moment wrote:Somehow I think you've got it around the wrong way... And what's a monekey? =P<Font color=Puce>Sweetie |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote:Actually it seems like im the ONLY one who has an idea as the rest of these peoples intelligence is like a monekeysTreasure Moment wrote:You really have absolutely NO idea of what you're going on about, do you TM?Micrówave wrote:as i said, there is NO comparision between the two, Freddie is million times better in every aspect and thats a FACT.Treasure Moment wrote: its the other way around! elvis doenst have 1/10000000 the talent or voice or range of freddie but you are too stupid to figure that out arent you?1. Elvis sang to more people than Freddie... by millions. 2. Elvis had more albums than Freddie and his bands 3. Elvis had more #1s than Freddie and his bands 4. Elvis had better teeth 5. Elvis had a better wardrobe 6. Elvis had only the best shit, Freddie was a cokehead. 7. Elvis got Priscilla Barnes, and possibly Marilyn Monroe. Freddie got Mary Austin... and possibly Jim Hutton. 8. Elvis has a bigger estate. Much bigger. (Possible double meaning) 9. Elvis not only had his rock career, but was an accomplished gospel singer as well. Freddie did a pretty cheesy Opera album. 10. Elvis lives. Scoreboard Elvis, you TM'd sheep. No wonder your band outed you. And I thought it was just for being gay. |
Sweetie 29.03.2008 02:49 |
^ I appear to have won =) And that's a FACT. |
Treasure Moment 29.03.2008 03:38 |
<Font color=Puce>Deakys |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote: ^ I appear to have won =) And that's a FACT.that i happened to type wrong? yes you won |
Poo, again 29.03.2008 10:44 |
EVERYTHING IS A FACT THAT'S A FACT FACE THE FACTS FACT FACT FUCKER FFF FACT |
LozlanTheMage 29.03.2008 12:38 |
Treasure Moment wrote:I think the more important issue is that you seem incapable of proving me wrong, ie that you are a raving nutbar without a shred of intellect, coherence or respect for your fellow man/woman. You claim to care about the poor in abstract, but the second any homeless, helpless human being wandered into this site and made a comment you disagreed with in some minor and asinine fashion, you'd rip into them with your patent combination of fool, sheep and sleep. You don't give a rat's ass about anyone but yourself, save when the brainless or foolish are commending you for your atrocious music or agreeing with you that The Pentagon is actually a gateway to the fiery realm of Zule.LozlanTheMage wrote:You cant prove the things i say wrong. Its real and its happening but you are just blind to see it.Treasure Moment wrote:'Silent you fool'? Sorry. That declaration only works if you are starring in a grainy black-and-white western epic. You also require a top hate, cape and Daliesque mustache to twirl at will. You are an absolute imbecile. A tool, a moron, a braindead waste of humanity. I can almost convince myself that you are a prolonged gag, or an infuriating form of modern performance art. You may also be a half-assed text generator - as far as I can tell you regurgitate the same twenty-seven words in random sequences. The only true indications of your sentience are the occasional youtube videos you post, which confirm that yes, indeed, you are human. Albeit a delusional, arrogant and (in all likelihood) mentally ill human. Go put on your tinfoil hat. Richard Nixon's zombie has been secretly resurrected by the Masons and is coming to your house tonight. And that's a FACT. (Although I agree with you about Microwave. But hey, even a stopped clock is right twice a day, eh?)LozlanTheMage wrote: AND THATS A FACT!&!)(@)($&)$y)o$*^)*%) Thanks for dancing for us, TM. You're a one-man black hole with a keyboard. By the by, the government is using galactic background radiation to harness the gravity of the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. They then use this gravity to make everyone fat and lazy. That's a FACT. ...well, not yet. I haven't quite finished my Youtube video. Stay tuned.Silent you fool, your brain doesnt function well. You are blind as a log, deaf as a post, and dumb as a stump. In fact your resemblance to decaying wood is magnificently intense. And that is a FACT. (I must confess, it certainly is fun to type FACT. FACT FACT FACT...) |
Sweetie 29.03.2008 19:52 |
Treasure Moment wrote:No, because you had nothing else to say then "I meant monkey"<Font color=Puce>Deakys |©|<h6>Microwa? wrote: ^ I appear to have won =) And that's a FACT.that i happened to type wrong? yes you won See, if I hadn't won, you would be going on about something completely stupid that didn't make sense. So I suppose, technically, I won anyways =) (FACT) |
Winter Land Man 29.03.2008 21:42 |
Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME also elvis could never in his life write a song like bohemian rhapsody .That's TRUE, because Elvis couldn't write a song lol. |
Treasure Moment 29.03.2008 22:01 |
! Jake ! wrote:haha, actually i dont know much about elvis, i like a few of his songs but to compare him to a guy like freddie is just silly. Freddie was on a totally different level.Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME also elvis could never in his life write a song like bohemian rhapsody .That's TRUE, because Elvis couldn't write a song lol. |
john bodega 30.03.2008 01:59 |
Fucking hilarious. "I saw it on Youtube, it's real. FACT". Go bury your face in the snow. |
Treasure Moment 30.03.2008 06:06 |
Zebonka12 wrote: Fucking hilarious. "I saw it on Youtube, it's real. FACT". Go bury your face in the snow."i saw it on tv and in the newspaper, its real. FACT" Go and bury your face in the snow. |
Poo, again 30.03.2008 07:27 |
Treasure Moment wrote:He's never said that.Zebonka12 wrote: Fucking hilarious. "I saw it on Youtube, it's real. FACT". Go bury your face in the snow."i saw it on tv and in the newspaper, its real. FACT" Go and bury your face in the snow. Go bury yer face in the snow. |
mercury241191 31.03.2008 14:04 |
For those of us who were there,Freddie was always considered the ultimate star because he had a certain magic about him and didn't go to ridiculous premiers/partys to be 'seen',so he carried that mystique about him,very few interviews/articles appeared unless he requested them(gutter press rags excepted).The others were still hugely talented,and Freddie would have upped sticks and buggered off if he didn't think so.I once saw Brian in an arcade in 1989 munching on a bag of Beef crisps,had a little chat and then he went to Mcdonalds with his kids.Can you honestly imagine Freddie eating crisps in an arcade? I don't think so........ |