I hate to be a damp squib, and I'm all for sharing, but surely if this is marked with 'Property of QP' all over, it's about as official as it gets and should be removed?!?!?
cmsdrums wrote: I hate to be a damp squib, and I'm all for sharing, but surely if this is marked with 'Property of QP' all over, it's about as official as it gets and should be removed?!?!?
cmsdrums wrote: I hate to be a damp squib, and I'm all for sharing, but surely if this is marked with 'Property of QP' all over, it's about as official as it gets and should be removed?!?!?
No. When we talk about "official", we don't mean something that comes from the Queen vaults. We mean something that's been officially released, something that the band has decided to sell at some point in their career. These takes were never released. Greg Brooks played them in a fan convention, and someone recorded it. As Greg was already expecting some people to bootleg it, he said (or used a recorded message...? I dunno) "Property of Queen Productions" several times while the stuff was being played, so that it would be on any bootleg recording made at the convention.
cmsdrums wrote: I hate to be a damp squib, and I'm all for sharing, but surely if this is marked with 'Property of QP' all over, it's about as official as it gets and should be removed?!?!?
smeghead
What can I possibly say in my defence to such a rapier like put down?
I was bored, thought I'd point this out, but the use of several exclamation marks clearly indicates that on a level of 1-10 of seriously asking for it to be removed, this is nothing past about a 3.
Well done, very well done.